- Research article
- Open Access
Novel avian single-chain fragment variable (scFv) targets dietary gluten and related natural grain prolamins, toxic entities of celiac disease
© Stadlmann et al. 2015
- Received: 16 July 2015
- Accepted: 10 November 2015
- Published: 1 December 2015
Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic, small intestinal inflammatory disease mediated by dietary gluten and related prolamins. The only current therapeutic option is maintenance of a strict life-long gluten-free diet, which implies substantial burden for CD patients. Different treatment regimes might be feasible, including masking of toxic celiac peptides with blocking antibodies or fragments thereof. The objective of this study was therefore to select and produce a recombinant avian single-chain fragment variable (scFv) directed against peptic-tryptic digested gliadin (PT-Gliadin) and related celiac toxic entities.
Gluten-free raised chicken of same age were immunized with PT-Gliadin. Chicken splenic lymphocytes, selected with antigen-coated magnetic beads, served as RNA source for the generation of cDNA. Chicken VH and VL genes were amplified from the cDNA by PCR to generate full-length scFv constructs consisting of VH and VL fragments joined by a linker sequence. ScFv constructs were ligated in a prokaryotic expression vector, which provides a C-terminal hexahistidine tag.
ScFvs from several bacterial clones were expressed in soluble form and crude cell lysates screened for binding to PT-Gliadin by ELISA. We identified an enriched scFv motif, which showed reactivity to PT-Gliadin. One selected scFv candidate was expressed and purified to homogeneity. Polyclonal anti-PT-Gliadin IgY, purified from egg yolk of immunized chicken, served as control. ScFv binds in a dose-dependent manner to PT-Gliadin, comparable to IgY. Furthermore, IgY competitively displaces scFv from PT-Gliadin and natural wheat flour digest, indicating a common epitope of scFv and IgY. ScFv was tested for reactivity to different gastric digested dietary grain flours. ScFv detects common and khorasan wheat comparably with binding affinities in the high nanomolar range, while rye is detected to a lesser extent. Notably, barley and cereals which are part of the gluten-free diet, like corn and rice, are not detected by scFv. Similarly, the pseudo-grain amaranth, used as gluten-free alternative, is not targeted by scFv. This data indicate that scFv specifically recognizes toxic cereal peptides relevant in CD.
ScFv can be of benefit for future CD treatment regimes.
- Celiac disease
- Celiac disease treatment
- Dietary gluten
Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic, small intestinal, immune-mediated disease driven by dietary wheat gluten and related prolamins in rye and barley [1, 2]. Disease hallmarks are varying degrees of villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltrates and serum auto-antibodies . Although the hellenic physician Artaeus the Cappadocianin already described CD symptoms in the second century AD , it was not until the 1940s when the link to dietary prolamins was established by the Dutch pediatrician Dicke [5, 6]. The current definition of CD is based on the 14th International CD Symposium in 2011 which led to ’The Oslo definitions for celiac disease and related terms’, published by Ludvigsson et al. in 2013 . Despite all efforts to describe and understand disease mechanisms, there is still lack of appropriate treatment. A stringent, life-long gluten free diet (GFD) is the only option, favoring abatement of symptoms and improvement of intestinal barrier function in most CD patients. Some potential treatment agents are already in preclinical and clinical phases, for example glutenase ALV003 [7, 8] (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00959114, NCT01255696) or tight junction regulator larazotide acetate AT-1001  (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01396213, NCT00620451). Another potential approach for CD treatment could be the blocking of toxic dietary peptides by antibodies or fragments thereof, which was the objective of this study.
Wheat gluten peptides, subdivided dependent on solubility in watery alcohols into soluble gliadins and insoluble glutenins, represent a heterogeneous mix of proteins of different molecular weights . Peptic, tryptic digests of the gliadin fraction, termed PT-Gliadin, mimic the peptide fraction entering the duodenum after gastric digestion. PT-Gliadin is a commonly chosen model antigen for studying CD [11–13] and served therefore as immunogen for chicken in this study. We produced PT-Gliadin reactive chicken yolk antibodies (IgY) and used immunized chicken as source for the production of recombinant antibody fragments in the single-chain format. Chicken IgY represents the avian equivalent to mammalian IgG, though IgY has many advantages considering human applications: IgY exerts no mammalian complement activation, rheumatoid factor interaction or cross-reactivity with mammalian IgG . IgY can be easily purified from yolks of immunized chicken by precipitation  or chromatography methods . In principle, IgY can be administered orally in enteric coated form [17, 18]. Chicken IgY is described for different diagnostic and therapeutic applications [19–22], including anti-Gliadin IgY for CD treatment . However, we consider the use of yolk IgY inefficient for clinical large scale production. Thus our goal was to engineer IgY fragments in a recombinant format, which can be expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) in soluble form and offers a scalable production process. In this study we report the cloning and selection of an avian single-chain fragment variable (scFv) directed against PT-Gliadin. We present data demonstrating the in vitro potential of scFv in targeting PT-Gliadin and natural flour digests. We observed comparable binding characteristics for scFv and polyclonal yolk IgY.
Preparation of PT-Gliadin
PT-Gliadin was prepared from wheat gliadin (Sigma) according to previously described methods  with some adjustments. Briefly, 10 g gliadin (gliadin from wheat, Sigma-Aldrich) was subjected to 40 ml 20 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.5. 800 μl immobilized pepsin (Thermo Scientific), washed three times with sodium acetate buffer according to manufacturer’s instruction, was added to the gliadin-buffer mixture. Peptic digest was performed by overnight incubation at 37 °C with agitation at 350 rpm. Pepsin was separated by centrifugation at 4000 x g for 2 min and aspiration of the supernatant. Pepsin was regenerated and stored according to manufacturer’s instruction. The supernatant was adjusted to pH 8 with 1 N NaOH. 800 μl immobilized trypsin (Thermo Scientific), washed three times with 20 mM ammonium hydrogen carbonate according to manufacturer’s instruction, was added to the gliadin digest. Tryptic digest was performed by overnight incubation at 37 °C with agitation. The volume was adjusted with ammonium hydrogen carbonate to 45 ml and the mixture incubated for further 3 h at 37 °C. Trypsin was separated by centrifugation at 4000 x g for 2 min and aspiration of the supernatant. Trypsin was regenerated and stored according to manufacturer’s instruction. The supernatant (containing PT-Gliadin) was filtrated through fluted and subsequently through 0.45 μm syringe filters. Total protein content was measured by BCA test (Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit, Thermo Scientific) and PT-Gliadin was lyophilized to equal protein amounts (~8 mg/ml) and stored at 4 °C. When needed, PT-Gliadin was resuspended in 1 ml sterile Tris buffered saline (TBS, made from 10 x concentrate, Sigma) and total protein content was confirmed by BCA measurement. For the immunization of chicken, PT-Gliadin was resuspended in 10 % acetic acid.
Preparation of flour digests
100 mg NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich) and 160 mg pepsin were dissolved in 25 ml H2O, pH was adjusted to 1.2 with 1 M HCl and volume was adjusted to 50 ml with H2O. This solution mimics gastric digestion and is referred to as simulated gastric fluid (SGF) according to United States Pharmacopoeia (USP32-NF27).
Barley (Rollgerste Gerstengraupen, Alnatura) and amaranth (Bio Amaranth “Das Inka-Korn”, HOLO) grains were grinded with mortar and pestle and 1 g of the grist was subjected to 5 ml SGF according to the protocol for flours described below. Wheat flour (Bio Weizen Vollkornmehl, Ja! Natürlich), khorasan wheat flour (Bio Kamutmehl, Vollkraft), rye flour (Bio Roggen Vollkornmehl, Rosenfellner Mühle), rice flour (Bio Reismehl fein gemahlen, HOLO), and corn flour (Polenta, Fini’s Feinstes,) were subjected directly to SGF: 5 ml SGF was added to 1 g flour or grist and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with agitation at 350 rpm. Pepsin was separated by centrifugation at 14,800 x g for 4 min and aspiration of the supernatant. Pepsin was regenerated and stored according to manufacturer’s instructions. Supernatant (resembling the flour digest) was adjusted to pH 8 with 1 N NaOH and the end volume was adjusted to 8 ml.
Immunization of laying hens
Brown laying hens, Gallus gallus domesticus Tetra SL, were raised on a gluten free diet from day 1 after hatching. Hens were primary immunized at an age of eight weeks by injecting a mixture of 250 μg PT-Gliadin (dissolved in 10 % acetic acid) and adjuvant into the pectoral muscle. Booster immunizations were given in intervals of three to four weeks. Blood samples were drawn pre and in weekly intervals after immunization and stored in 10 % EDTA at – 20 °C until analysis. All animal procedures followed the institutional laboratory animal research guidelines and were approved by the State veterinary and food administration of the Slovak republic.
60 eggs collected from various immunized chicken housed in the same facility were pooled to an IgY batch. IgY fraction was precipitated from egg yolks according to a previously developed in-house method: Yolks were separated from egg white and mixed with the 9-fold amount of deionized H2O with respect to yolk weight. 3 ml caprylic acid, pH 4.0 (Merck), per egg yolk was added drop-wise and the solution stirred for 1 h. Solution was filtered through fluted filter and washed with 30 ml deionized-H2O per egg yolk. Filter cake was discarded and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.2 with 1 N NaOH. 20 % (v/v) pre-chilled ethanol (Ethanol absolute, Roth) was added slowly under constant stirring at 400 rpm (volume ethanol represent ¼ of volume caprylic acid precipitation). Solution was precipitated over night in centrifuge beakers at −10 °C, followed by a centrifugation step at 0 °C and 11,000 x g for 30 min. Supernatant was discarded, pellet was dissolved in 15 ml phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and stored at −20 °C until use. 12 ml of the resuspended solution was subjected to 12 ml 10 mM phosphate buffer supplemented with 100 mM NaCl. 3.5 % (w/v) polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG, Sigma-Aldrich) was added and mixture stirred at 400 rpm for 30 min at room temperature. Solution was centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 min and the supernatant was filtered through a fluted filter. 12 % (w/v) fresh PEG 6000 was added and the mixture stirred at 400 rpm for 1 h at room temperature. Solution was centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in a total volume of 12 ml 10 mM phosphate buffer supplemented with 100 mM NaCl. 12 % (w/v) fresh PEG 6000 was added and the mixture stirred at 400 rpm for 1 h at room temperature. Solution was centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the centrifugation step, discarding the supernatant, repeated twice. The pellet containing the purified IgY fraction was resuspended in TBS and stored at 4 °C until use.
Cloning strategy for the generation of chicken scFvs
10–14 days after the third immunization, chicken with confirmed blood titer were sacrificed. Spleens were harvested and merged through a 100 μm nylon cell strainer (BD Biosciences) with 10 ml sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS sterile, Life Technologies). 10 ml sterile ficoll solution (GE Healthcare) was pipetted underneath the cell suspension and tubes were centrifuged at 660 x g for 20 min for the formation of a density gradient. The interphase, containing mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and monocytes, respectively) was isolated, and the remaining gradient discarded. Mononuclear cells were washed with 1 ml fresh PBS, mixed be inverting the tube and centrifuged at 300 x g for 5 min. Supernatant was discarded and the washing step was repeated twice. Washed cells were diluted in PBS to a concentration of 1 x 10^7 cells/ml and afterward subjected to magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-450 Epoxy, Life Technologies), pre-coated with PT-Gliadin according to manufacturer’s instructions. 25 μl of pre-coated beads were washed according to protocol and added to 1 ml cell suspension. Suspension was incubated at 4 °C with end-over-end tilting for 20 min. Suspension was placed on a magnetic stand for 2 min, supernatant was discarded. Beads bound cells were washed six times with fresh, sterile PBS. PBS was discarded and beads bound cells were resuspended in 1 ml PBS. Beads bound cells were subjected immediately to total RNA extraction using ReliaPrep™ RNA Cell Miniprep System from Promega according to manufacturer’s instruction. Beads were separated magnetically prior to loading of the suspension on the RNA capturing mini column. RNA quantity was analyzed by NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Peqlab biotechnology GMBH). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from ~1 μg total RNA using random hexameric primers (Life technologies) and SuperScript®III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was amplified using a set of specific primers for chicken VH (forward: 5′-GCC GTG ACG TTG GAC GA-3′; reverse: 5′-GGA GGA GAC GAT GAC TTC GG-3′) and VL (forward: 5′-AGG CTG ACT CAG CCG T-3′; reverse: 5′-ACC TAG GAC GGT CAG GG-3′) gene regions. Gel purified PCR products were subjected to a second PCR reaction, to introduce a peptide linker (GSTSGSGKPGSGEGSTKG) sequence  and restriction sites:
VH gene products were amplified with primer sets to introduce NcoI/BamHI sites (forward: 5′-ATG TCT CTA TCC ATG GCC GTG ACG TTG GAC GA-3′; NcoI site in boldface; reverse:
5′-ATG ATG GGA TCC GGG CTT GCC GCT ACC GGA AGT AGA GCC GGA GGA GAC GAT GAC TTC GG-3′, BamHI site in boldface;). VL gene products were amplified with primer sets to insert BglII and NotI sites (forward: 5′- CAT CAT AGA TCT GGT GAA GGT AGC ACT AAA GGT GCG CTG ACT CAG CCG T-3′, BglII site in boldface; reverse: 5′- GTG GTG GTG CTC TCG AGT GCG GCC GCG GGA CCT AGG ACG GTC AGG G-3′, NotI site in boldface). VH and VL re-amplification products were directly used for cloning into pCR® 2.1 by TOPO cloning (TOPO®, Life technologies) according to manufacturer’s recommendation. 50 μl of chemically competent Escherichia coli (E. coli) One Shot® TOP10 (Life technologies) were transformed with 2.5 μl of TOPO VH or VL cloning products, respectively. Bacterial clones were grown overnight in 2 ml LB broth (Sigma) supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin at 225 rpm at room temperature. Plasmid DNA from overnight cultures was isolated using Pure Yield™ Plasmid Mini Prep System from Promega. Plasmid DNA was subjected to sequencing using M13_rev sequencing primer (5′-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG AC-3′) at Microsynth AG, Vienna, Austria. Sequencing analysis ensured the correct insertion of VH/VL cloning products; at least four clones per plate were analyzed. To generate separate chicken VH and VL libraries, TOPO VH or VL cultures were scraped off the plates and transferred to 100 ml fresh LB broth (supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin) each. Library cultures were incubated overnight at 225 rpm and 37 °C. Plasmid DNA of VH and VL library cultures was isolated with Pure Yield™ Plasmid Midiprep System from Promega. DNA concentration was quantified photometrical (BioPhotometer, dsDNA method, Eppendorf). VH Plasmid DNA (corresponding to 5–10 μg DNA) was subjected to digestion with NcoI and BamHI (New England BioLabs), while VL Plasmid DNA was digested with NotI and BglII (New England BioLabs). The plasmid vector pET28a(+)(Novagen) was digested with NcoI and NotI, followed by dephopsphorylation with alkaline phoshatase (Roche). Restriction digests were separated by preparative 1.2 % agarose gels and VH and VL bands isolated from the gel with sterile scalpels and purified using QIAEX II Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). A 3-way ligation of VH and VL fragments and pET28a(+) expression vector (carrying a His6-tag) was performed to generate full-length scFvs: E. coli One Shot® BL21(DE3) (Life technologies) were transformed with the ligation products. As quality control, at least four clones per plate were cultivated overnight as mentioned above and analyzed by sequencing with pET28a_seq forward (5′-GTC CGG CGT AGA GGA TCG-3′) and reverse (5′-ATC CGG ATA TAG TTC CTC CTT T-3′) primers, to ensure the insertion of correct full-length scFvs in-frame with the C-terminal hexahistidine tag.
Soluble expression of His6-tagged-scFvs in E. coli BL21 (DE3)
Individual bacterial clones were cultivated in LB supplemented with 25 μg/ml of kanamycin (kanamycin sulfate, Sigma-Aldrich) with agitation at 225 rpm over night at room temperature. The next day, fresh LB medium (supplemented with 25 μg/ml of kanamycin) was inoculated with 1/10 volume of overnight culture. Expression cultures were cultivated at room temperature with agitation at 225 rpm until optical density (OD)600 reached 0.4 – 0.5. Protein expression was induced by the addition of 1 mM sterile isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Sigma-Aldrich) to expression cultures. At selected time points pre- and post induction, cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 20 min. Supernatants were discarded and cell pellets stored frozen at −80 °C until cellular lysis. Cell pellets were lysed with Qproteome™ Bacterial Protein Prep Kit from Qiagen according to manufacturer’s instruction. The soluble supernatants, referred to as crude extracts, were stored at −20 °C.
Purification of anti-PT-Gliadin scFv
Small-scale purification of bacterial crude extracts was performed using Ni-NTA-spin columns (Thermo Scientific: 0.2 ml or 10 ml volumes respectively) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Eluates were buffer exchanged in TBS using Zeba Spin Desalting Columns (Thermo Scientific, 7 K MWCO, 0.5 ml or 10 ml volumes respectively) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Purified proteins were stored at −20 °C. For large scale expression, scFv was cultivated in LB supplemented with 25 μg/ml of kanamycin in lab fermenter scale (1–5 l culture volume respectively). Protein expression was induced with 1 mM IPTG and cell pellets were harvested 4–5 h post induction by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 20 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in 10 mM imidazole buffer (3–4 buffer excess in relation to wet biomass). Solution was treated three times for 30 s with an ultra-turaxx on ice. Solution was homogenized for 5 min 15 s at 100–150 MPa on ice (for 20 ml volumes respectively). Homogenizates, containing soluble ScFv, were purified by Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) with HiTrap TALON crude columns (1 or 25 ml size, Co2+) and imidazole (10 mM imidazole in application buffer, 500 mM imidazole in elution buffer) using an äkta purifier (Äkta pure, GE Healthcare). IMAC eluates were further purified by Size-Exclusion-Chromatography (Superdex 75 pg, Mr 3 000 to 70 000. 16/600, GE Healthcare) using an äkta purifier (Äkta pure, GE Healthcare). Pooled eluates were buffer exchanged into TBS via spin columns (Amicon® Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Units) and stored at −20 °C. ScFv of size-exclusion chromatography purity grade was used directly for ELISA and Western Blot characterization methods.
For comparison of PT-Gliadin and different grain digests, 96-well plates (biomat HB) were coated with 100 μl/well of PT-Gliadin dilution ranges (1000, 5000, 250, 125 ng/ml respectively); or digests of wheat, khorasan wheat (kamut), rye, barley, corn, rice and amaranth flours (15.0, 7.5, 3.8, 1.9 μg/ml respectively). For all other ELISA experiments, 96-well plates were coated with constant concentrations (1000 ng/ml PT-Gliadin or 15 μg/ml of wheat flour, respectively). Plates were coated with antigens diluted in 20 mM Na2CO3 buffer, pH 9.6 over night at 4 °C. Plates were blocked with 300 μl per well of 1 % (w/v) PEG 6000 in 20 mM Na2CO3 for 1 h. Control plates were treated in the same way with the exception that antigen was omitted. Plates were dried and stored at room temperature in a dry atmosphere.
All sample and antibody dilutions were performed in TBST buffer (TBS with 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20) supplemented with 1 % (v/v) BSA (Albumin solution from bovine serum, 30 % in 0.85 % sodium chloride, Sigma-Aldrich): EDTA-plasma samples of pre-immune and immunized chicken were diluted 1000-fold. IgY or scFv (size-exclusion chromatography purity grade) were diluted to 1000, 500, 250, 125, 63, 31 ng/ml.
Samples were added in triplicates (100 μl per well) to coated and control wells. Plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm. Plates were washed four times with 300 μl per well of TBST. 100 μl per well of goat anti-chicken-IgG (H + L)-HRP antibody (southern biotech) was added at a 1:3000 dilution. Plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm. Plates were washed four times with 300 μl per well of TBST. 100 μl pre-mixed tetramethybenzidine (TMB) substrate (Pierce) was added per well and developing color reaction was stopped with 50 μl of 2 N H2SO4. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm in a micro plate reader (GloMax-Multi Detection system, Promega).
For Screening of scFv candidates, bacterial crude extracts were diluted 10-fold and 50 μl per well was subjected to coated and control wells, respectively. Plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm. Mouse anti-penta-His antibody (Qiagen) was diluted 250-fold and 50 ng per well was added to the crude extract dilutions. Plates were incubated at 350 rpm for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were washed four times with TBST. Goat anti-mouse-IgG (H + L)-HRP antibody (southern-biotech) was diluted 1000-fold and 100 ng per well was added. Plates were incubated at 350 rpm for 1.5 h at room temperature. Plates were washed four times with 300 μl per well TBST and ELISA was developed as mentioned above.
All sample and antibody dilutions were performed in TBST buffer supplemented with 1 % (v/v) BSA.
50 μl per well of Anti-PT-Gliadin IgY at concentrations of ~ 100, 400, 800, 1600 and 3200 μg/ml were added in triplicates to coated or control wells. Plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm. 50 μl of scFv was added per well in a ~ 0.04 [μg/ml] concentration. Plates were incubated for 40 min at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm. Plates were washed four times with 300 μl per well TBST. 100 μl per well of mouse anti-penta-His antibody was added at a 1:500 dilution. Plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm and washed four times with 300 μl per well TBST. 100 μl per well of goat anti-mouse-IgG-HRP was added in a 1:1000 dilution and plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm. Plates were washed four times with TBST. ELISA was developed according to direct ELISA.
30 μg per lane crude bacterial extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE (NuPage 12 % Bis Tris Gel, Life technologies) using EI9001-XCELL II Mini-Cell (Life technologies). Proteins were electrophoretically transferred (Trans-Blot® SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell, Bio-Rad) to activated 0.45 μm PVDF membranes (Life Technologies). Unlike otherwise noted, all following incubation steps were performed at room temperature with agitation at 350 rpm: Membranes were blocked with 3 % (w/v) skim milk powder (Fluka) in TBS for 1 h. Membranes were incubated simultaneously with mouse-anti-penta-His antibody (Qiagen) at a 1:500 dilution and mouse-anti-HSP60 (Heat Shock Protein 60, Mouse monoclonal antibody, Thermo Scientific) at a 1:7500 dilution in TBST supplemented with 1 % milk powder for 1 h. Membranes were washed twice for 10 min with TBST, followed by incubation in anti-mouse-IgG-HRP (Amersham ECL Western Blotting Reagent Pack, GE healthcare) at a 1:2000 dilution in TBST supplemented with 1 % milk powder for 1 h. Membranes were washed once in TBST and once in TBS. Immunoreactivity was assessed by incubating membranes in Western Blot substrate (SuperSignal® West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate, Thermo Scientific) using the ECL chemiluminescence Western Blot system (Amersham Hyperfilm™ ECL, GE Healthcare).
10 μg per lane PT-Gliadin/ wheat flour digest or 50 μg per lane digests of wheat, khorasan wheat (kamut), rye, barley, corn rice and amaranth were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes and blotted as described above. Membranes were incubated over night at +4 °C with scFv (size-exclusion chromatography purity grade) at a 1:500 dilution (~15 μg/ml), or 1:3000 dilution (~2.5 μg/l) or IgY at a 1:100000 dilution (~1 μg/ml) in TBST supplemented with 1 % (w/v) milk powder. Membranes were washed twice for 10 min with TBST two times followed by an incubation in goat anti-chicken-IgG(H + L)-HRP antibody (southern biotech) at a 1:12000 dilution in TBST supplemented with 1 % milk powder for 1 h. Membranes were washed once in TBST and once in TBS. Western Blot was developed as described above.
Data evaluation & statistical analysis
ELISA data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 Software. Unlike otherwise noted, data represent mean values of triplicates with standard error of the mean (SEM) shown as error bars. For determination of mean affinity constants, direct ELISA data was analyzed by 3-parameter curve-fit nonlinear regression, OD50 values were derived for each particular antigen coating concentration. The final mean affinity constant represents the mean value (+/−SEM) of 4 different calculations: 3 calculated affinity constants at antigen coating ratio of 2; 1 calculated affinity constants at antigen coating ratio of 8. Each single calculation of affinity constant was performed according to the following equation: Kaff = (n − 1)/2 (n[AB′]t − [AB]t) [26, 27] for coating with two antigen concentrations [AG]t and [AG’]t and OD50 values at concentration [AB]t and [AB’]t; n = [AG]t/[AG’]t and corresponds to antigen coating ratio.
Production of PT-Gliadin reactive chicken IgY
Production and selection of PT-gliadin reactive scFv
Purified scFv candidate detects PT-Gliadin and peptic digested common whole wheat flour in vitro
Polyclonal anti-PT-Gliadin-IgY competitively displaces scFv - evidence of a common epitope
ScFv detects gluten-containing grain digests, including common wheat, khorasan wheat and rye
Equilibrium binding constants of scFv for PT-Gliadin and wheat digests
Kaff mean (+/− SEM) [M−1]
3.82 (+/− 1.93) x 107
Wheat flour digest
3.21 (+/− 2.14) x 107
Kamut flour digest
2.30 (+/− 1.49) x 107
Much research contributed in solving the puzzle of celiac disease, which is known today as a multi-factorial interplay of innate and adaptive immunity. In short, dietary derived prolamins termed ‘gluten’ break intestinal epithelial barrier and enter the lamina propria, where they provoke adverse reactions accomplished both by innate and adaptive immune cells. The only treatment option for CD remains the GFD which, though successful in most patients, is associated with substantial social burden, higher nutritional costs and compliance problems . In some patients, however, even after long-term adherence to GFD, CD symptoms and clinical manifestations remain [30–32]. Overall, there is urgent need for therapeutic regimes complementing or replacing the GFD.
In this study, we present an avian scFv, selected from a chicken gene library, which targets PT-Gliadin and natural flour digests of wheat and rye. ScFv was expressed successful in soluble form in E. coli, purified to homogeneity and characterized by biochemical methods. We could demonstrate concentration -dependent specific binding of scFv to PT-Gliadin with binding affinities in the high nanomolar range. ScFv showed similar binding patterns to PT-Gliadin and wheat flour digest compared to polyclonal IgY, purified from yolks of immunized chicken. We designed a competitive ELISA experiment to demonstrate displacement of scFv by IgY, which argues for a common epitope between scFv and IgY. CD is provoked by dietary prolamins of the triticeaen grass tribe, including wheat gliadin, rye secalin and barley hordein. Strictly speaking, gliadin denotes the prolamin fraction of wheat. When referring to toxic celiac entities, however, the term gluten is used synonymously for noxious prolamins of different grain origin. By subjecting equal amounts of different whole grain flours to gastric digestion (by the aid of SGF, as mentioned in the experimental section), we were able to directly compare binding of scFv to different cereal grains high or devoid of gluten. ScFv shows comparable binding to common wheat flour and khorasan wheat flour digests. Khorasan wheat (Triticum turgidum turanicum), traded as kamut, is considered an ancient relative of modern durum wheat (pasta wheat) . Previously, it was assumed that ancient wheat strains like khorasan are devoid or low of celiac toxicity compared to modern industrial strains. Recent studies demonstrate the lack of difference between the toxicity of traditional and modern strains and recommend the total exclusion of all wheat varieties [33, 34]. Our observation, that scFv targets both, common bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) and khorasan wheat (Triticum turgidum turanicum), supports this view. Triticum aestivum is the predominantly used wheat species in the modern industrialized world, especially since its high protein content favors baking properties. It harbors the most immunogenic celiac toxins , though homologous toxic peptides can be found in rye and barley. Accordingly, scFv detected rye to a lesser extent than common or khorasan wheat. Notably, scFv failed to detect barley digest in our setting. Most studies assessing celiac toxicity are focusing on wheat gluten or digests thereof [36, 37], though immune reactivity to rye and barley was readily demonstrated in the past  and is reflected by the susceptibility of CD patients to these grain species. A recent study investigated significant differences in hordein spectra of different barley varieties, rendering malting barleys (Hordeum vulgare) less immunogenic than wild barleys (Hordeum chilense) . In our experimental setting, six-rowed barley (Hordeum vulgare hexastichon), a representative of the H. vulgare species, was used. To our knowledge, degree of celiac toxicity has not been investigated explicitly for this barley subspecies so far. Overall, we assume that our scFv detects celiac noxious peptides present in substantial amounts in wheat and rye, but in quantities below the detection limit in barley. Another possibility is that the epitope targeted by scFv is present in wheat and rye digests, but absent or not accessible in barley digests. Rice and corn represent natural gluten-free grains and are essential part of the GFD . Conclusively, scFv shows no reactivity towards these grain species. Recently, pseudo grains like amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa have entered the stage . They resemble grains though they belong biologically to a distinct group, and therefore represent a welcome dietary alternative for CD patients. As expected, scFv showed no reactivity to amaranth digest. In summary, we were able to soluble express a scFv in E. coli, which exerts specific binding towards PT-Gliadin and gluten-containing wheat and rye digests, known to be noxious in terms of CD.
We have successfully cloned and selected a scFv specific for noxious CD peptides. It has shown in vitro binding potential to PT-Gliadin and digests of gluten-containing grains, but exerts no reactivity to gluten-free grains and pseudo grains. We think that scFv can be of benefit for future CD treatment regimes.
This work was supported by a grant from the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (TRBL 2013OSiN, FFG Project No. 840792 and 845760). Large-scale production and purification of scFv was performed by the project partner TU Vienna, Research Division of Biochemical Engineering. This project benefitted from a previous PhD project about an IgY based therapy for celiac disease. It was conducted at Sciotec Diagnostic Technologies by Roland Leitner, whom we would like to thank for laying the foundation stones for the recent project. Thank goes to the lab team of Sciotec Diagnostic Technologies GmbH, which supported this project by preparing PT-Gliadin batches, coating of plates and much more assistant work.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Jabri B, Kasarda DD, Green PHR. Innate and adaptive immunity: the yin and yang of celiac disease. Immunol Rev. 2005;206:219–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jabri B, Sollid LM. Mechanisms of disease: immunopathogenesis of celiac disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;3:516–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Green PHR, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1731–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paveley WF. From Aretaeus to Crosby: a history of coeliac disease. BMJ. 1988;297:1646–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Mulder CJ. Pioneer in the gluten free diet: Willem-Karel Dicke 1905–1962, over 50 years of gluten free diet. Gut. 1993;34:1473–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, Biagi F, Fasano A, Green PHR, et al. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut. 2013;62:43–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lähdeaho M, Kaukinen K, Laurila K, Vuotikka P, Koivurova O, Kärjä-Lahdensuu T, et al. Glutenase ALV003 attenuates gluten-induced mucosal injury in patients with celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1649–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crowe SE. Management of celiac disease: beyond the gluten-free diet. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1594–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paterson BM, Lammers KM, Arrieta MC, Fasano A, Meddings JB. The safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of AT-1001 in coeliac disease subjects: a proof of concept study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:757–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wieser H. Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:115–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Capozzi A, Vincentini O, Gizzi P, Porzia A, Longo A, Felli C, et al. Modulatory effect of gliadin peptide 10-mer on epithelial intestinal CACO-2 cell inflammatory response. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas KE, Sapone A, Fasano A, Vogel SN. Gliadin stimulation of murine macrophage inflammatory gene expression and intestinal permeability are MyD88-dependent: role of the innate immune response in Celiac disease. J Immunol. 2006;176:2512–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Troncone R, Gianfrani C, Mazzarella G, Greco L, Guardiola J, Auricchio S, et al. Majority of gliadin-specific T-cell clones from celiac small intestinal mucosa produce interferon-gamma and interleukin-4. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:156–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schade R, Calzado EG, Sarmiento R, Chacana PA, Porankiewicz-Asplund J, Terzolo HR. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY-technology): a review of progress in production and use in research and human and veterinary medicine. Altern Lab Anim. 2005;33:129–54.Google Scholar
- Polson A. Isolation of IgY from the yolks of eggs by a chloroform polyethylene glycol procedure. Immunol Invest. 1990;19:253–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hansen P, Scoble JA, Hanson B, Hoogenraad NJ. Isolation and purification of immunoglobulins from chicken eggs using thiophilic interaction chromatography. J Immunol Methods. 1998;215:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vega CG, Bok M, Vlasova AN, Chattha KS, Fernández FM, Wigdorovitz A, et al. IgY antibodies protect against human Rotavirus induced diarrhea in the neonatal gnotobiotic piglet disease model. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42788.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rahman S, Higo-Moriguchi K, Htun KW, Taniguchi K, Icatlo FC, Tsuji T, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of immunoglobulin Y as adjunct to standard supportive therapy for rotavirus-associated diarrhea among pediatric patients. Vaccine. 2012;30:4661–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dias da Silva W, Tambourgi DV. IgY: a promising antibody for use in immunodiagnostic and in immunotherapy. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010;135:173–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fu C, Huang H, Wang X, Liu Y, Wang Z, Cui S, et al. Preparation and evaluation of anti-SARS coronavirus IgY from yolks of immunized SPF chickens. J Virol Methods. 2006;133:112–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meenatchisundaram S, Shanmugam V, Anjali VM. Development of chicken egg yolk antibodies against streptococcus mitis - purification and neutralizing efficacy. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2011;2:109–14.Google Scholar
- Oliver C, Valenzuela K, Silva H, Haro RE, Cortés M, Sandoval R, et al. Effectiveness of egg yolk immunoglobulin (IgY) against the intracellular salmonid pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;119:365–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gujral N, Löbenberg R, Suresh M, Sunwoo H. In-vitro and in-vivo binding activity of chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin Y (IgY) against gliadin in food matrix. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:3166–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Ritis G, Occorsio P, Auricchio S, Gramenzi F, Morisi G, Silano V. Toxicity of wheat flour proteins and protein-derived peptides for in vitro developing intestine from rat fetus. Pediatr Res. 1979;13:1255–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitlow M, Bell BA, Feng SL, Filpula D, Hardman KD, Hubert SL, et al. An improved linker for single-chain Fv with reduced aggregation and enhanced proteolytic stability. Protein Eng. 1993;6:989–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loomans EE, Roelen AJ, van Damme HS, Bloemers HP, Gribnau TC, Schielen WJ. Assessment of the functional affinity constant of monoclonal antibodies using an improved enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Immunol Methods. 1995;184:207–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Safdari Y, Farajnia S, Asgharzadeh M, Khalili M, Jaliani HZ. Affinity measurement of single chain antibodies: a mathematical method facilitated by statistical software SigmaPlot. Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother. 2014;33:13–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lionetti E, Gatti S, Pulvirenti A, Catassi C. Celiac disease from a global perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29:365–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hall NJ, Rubin G, Charnock A. Systematic review: adherence to a gluten-free diet in adult patients with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:315–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Midhagen G, Hallert C. High rate of gastrointestinal symptoms in celiac patients living on a gluten-free diet: controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2023–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bardella MT, Velio P, Cesana BM, Prampolini L, Casella G, Di Bella C, et al. Coeliac disease: a histological follow-up study. Histopathology. 2007;50:465–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee SK, Lo W, Memeo L, Rotterdam H, Green PHR. Duodenal histology in patients with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:187–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Šuligoj T, Gregorini A, Colomba M, Ellis HJ, Ciclitira PJ. Evaluation of the safety of ancient strains of wheat in coeliac disease reveals heterogeneous small intestinal T cell responses suggestive of coeliac toxicity. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:1043–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gregorini A, Colomba M, Ellis HJ, Ciclitira PJ. Immunogenicity characterization of two ancient wheat α-gliadin peptides related to coeliac disease. Nutrients. 2009;1:276–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Comino I, Moreno ML, Real A, Rodríguez-Herrera A, Barro F, Sousa C. The gluten-free diet: testing alternative cereals tolerated by celiac patients. Nutrients. 2013;5:4250–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellis HJ, Rosen-Bronson S, O’Reilly N, Ciclitira PJ. Measurement of gluten using a monoclonal antibody to a coeliac toxic peptide of A-gliadin. Gut. 1998;43:190–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sturgess R, Day P, Ellis HJ, Lundin KE, Gjertsen HA, Kontakou M, et al. Wheat peptide challenge in coeliac disease. Lancet. 1994;343:758–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morón B, Bethune MT, Comino I, Manyani H, Ferragud M, López MC, et al. Toward the assessment of food toxicity for celiac patients: characterization of monoclonal antibodies to a main immunogenic gluten peptide. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Comino I, Real A, Gil-Humanes J, Pistón F, de Lorenzo L, Moreno ML, et al. Significant differences in coeliac immunotoxicity of barley varieties. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012;56:1697–707.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ludvigsson JF, Bai JC, Biagi F, Card TR, Ciacci C, Ciclitira PJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 2014;63:1210–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergamo P, Maurano F, Mazzarella G, Iaquinto G, Vocca I, Rivelli AR, et al. Immunological evaluation of the alcohol-soluble protein fraction from gluten-free grains in relation to celiac disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55:1266–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar