- Methodology article
- Open Access
AAV vector distribution in the mouse respiratory tract following four different methods of administration
- Lisa A. Santry†1,
- Joelle C. Ingrao†1,
- Darrick L. Yu1,
- Jondavid G. de Jong1,
- Laura P. van Lieshout1,
- Geoffrey A. Wood1 and
- Sarah K. Wootton1Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
- Received: 10 January 2017
- Accepted: 8 May 2017
- Published: 15 May 2017
Targeted delivery of gene therapy vectors to the mouse respiratory tract is often performed via intranasal or intratracheal administration; however, there can be a great deal of variability between these methods, which could potentially influence experimental results. Improving the accuracy and precision of lung delivery will not only reduce the number of animals required to detect statistically significant differences, but may reduce the variability of studies from different laboratories.
Here we evaluated three different methods of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector administration to the respiratory tract in mice (intranasal, intubation, and intratracheal injection) and discuss the advantages, challenges, and shortcomings of each. We also present a modified-intranasal delivery technique that is superior to passive administration of vector into the nares of anesthetized supine animals. Transgene expression was consistently visible in the nasal cavity, trachea, and proximal to middle aspect of all lung lobes for all four methods, whereas transgene expression was consistently observed in the most distal aspect of lung lobes only with the intubation and intratracheal injection techniques. AAV vector genome copy numbers in the lung were approximately four-fold lower in mice that received vector via intranasal administration in comparison to the other three methods of vector delivery. The modified intranasal, intubation and intratracheal injection methods of vector administration did not yield statistical differences in AAV vector genome copy numbers in the lung. With regard to reproducibility of vector distribution within and between animals, the modified-intranasal technique was superior.
Our results show that mode of AAV vector administration to the murine respiratory tract should be selected based on desired target site and skill of the researcher, and that appropriate technique selection may greatly influence experimental outcomes.
- Adeno-associated virus
- Vector instillation
- Transgene expression
- Respiratory tract
- Respiratory epithelium
Gene therapy is currently being evaluated for a wide range of acute and chronic lung diseases including those caused by single gene defects such as cystic fibrosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and surfactant protein B deficiency . While the lung provides a natural route of entry into the host and can be accessed in a comparatively easy and noninvasive manner, methods for consistent and efficient delivery of viral vectors to the respiratory tract are required. There have been a number of studies evaluating variables such as volume of inoculum, effect of diluent, nature of anesthesia (inhaled vs. injected), and position of mouse [2, 3] and how these affect intranasal delivery of therapeutic substances in mouse models, but a comparison of different delivery methods using viral vectors has not been done. Targeted delivery of viral vectors to the mouse respiratory tract can be performed by a variety of different methods, some of which require extensive skill and training. In this report, four different methods of delivering viral vectors to the mouse respiratory tract were evaluated for ease and consistency, vector distribution, and invasiveness of the procedure with the aim of identifying the most effective and consistent method of delivery requiring minimal skill development.
Here we show that the modified-intranasal technique resulted in a similar and consistent distribution of vector to the upper and lower respiratory tract, including all lung lobes, in all mice examined. While the intratracheal and intubation methods resulted in somewhat inconsistent distribution of vector, particularly to one lung lobe, the efficiency of lung gene delivery was similar to that of the modified intranasal technique. However, only the intubation method resulted in consistent vector transduction of the distal most aspect of the lung. Intranasal delivery efficiently targeted vector to the upper respiratory tract and as expected, led to robust transduction of the nasal epithelium with significantly less vector transduction in the lung relative to the other three methods of vector administration. In conclusion, the modified-intranasal technique proved to be the most efficient and consistent method of vector delivery requiring the least amount of skill. Use of the modified-intranasal technique for delivery of viral vectors to the mouse respiratory tract may improve the accuracy and precision of lung delivery, which may reduce variability between studies from different laboratories and can have animal welfare implications by reducing the number of animals required for detecting statistically significant differences.
Gross analysis of transgene expression
Histological analysis of AAV vector distribution in the mouse lung
Quantification of vector genome copy number in lungs
It has been shown that relative distribution of a substance between the upper, lower respiratory, and gastrointestinal tract in mice following intranasal administration is largely dependent on delivery volume and level of anesthesia [2, 3]. Studies have shown that small volumes, specifically those less than 10 μl, resulted in detection of the administered substance predominantly in the upper respiratory tract, whereas efficient detection in the lower respiratory tract required administration of volumes greater than 50 μl [2, 3]. In addition, intranasal installation was more efficient in anesthetized animals versus awake animals , and in animals anesthetized with inhalant anesthetic versus parenteral . Based on these findings, the current study evaluated transduction of the respiratory tract of mice following delivery of 1x1011 vg of an AAV serotype 6 vector expressing the human placental alkaline phosphatase (hPLAP) reporter gene in a fixed volume of 80 μl to animals that were anesthetized with isoflurane at deep plane in order to contrast and compare four different methods of administration.
The modified-intranasal technique resulted in a similar and consistent distribution of vector to the upper and lower respiratory tract, including all lung lobes, with vector seldom reaching the most distal aspect of the lung. Intratracheal and intubation methods resulted in less consistent vector transduction with a lack of localization to the right middle lung lobe; however, both methods resulted in vector transduction of the distal most part of the lung. The intranasal technique resulted in vector localization primarily within the upper respiratory tract and significantly less vector transduction in the lung compared to the other three methods. These results indicate that the method of vector administration should be chosen based on preferred target site and expertise of the researcher, and that appropriate technique selection may influence experimental outcomes.
Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the four delivery methods evaluated
- Nasal epithelium
- Tracheal epithelium
- Proximal aspect of lung lobes
- Relatively quick
- Little skill/training required
- Can be performed by one person
- Best option if wanting to target the upper respiratory tract
- Can administer multiple doses
- Frequent loss of vector due to swallowing
- Inefficient delivery to the
lower respiratory tract
- Nasal epithelium
- Tracheal epithelium
- Proximal to middle aspect of lung lobes
- Relatively quick
- Little skill/training required
- Least variable delivery method
- Can administer multiple doses
- Requires two people
- Does not reach the distal aspect of lung lobes
- Nasal epithelium
- Tracheal epithelium
- Proximal, middle and distal aspect of lung lobes
- Method that most
consistently reaches the distal aspect of the lung lobes
- Can be performed by one person
- Technically challenging
- Requires more equipment than the other methods
- Time consuming
- Possibility of losing
vector if esophagus is penetrated
- Excessive swelling prevents repeated attempts at intubation
- Nasal epithelium
- Tracheal epithelium
- Proximal to middle
aspect of lung lobes
- Possible to target distal aspect of lung lobes
- Primarily targets the lower
- Limited delivery to the nasal epithelium
- Can be performed by one person, but is easier with two people
- Technically challenging
- Requires surgical skills
- Requires analgesic
- Re-administration not advised if done more than 5 days after initial administration
Previous studies have shown that depth of anesthesia can influence the amount of administered substance lost to the gastrointestinal tract [2, 3]. For both the intranasal and the modified-intranasal technique, the mouse was briefly removed from the source of isoflurane anesthesia prior to vector administration. Therefore, quick recovery and a light plane of anesthesia may have resulted in an increased loss of vector to the gastrointestinal tract. According to our criteria, which were established based on previous experiments, swallowing was documented to have occurred if liquid was found pooling in the mouth of the mouse immediately following vector administration or if bubbles of liquid were released from the mouth during or immediately following vector administration. Unfortunately, because we did not harvest the esophagus and stomach from the animals used in this study, we cannot substantiate these observations. Nevertheless, pooling of liquid in the mouth and production of bubbles was commonly observed with the intranasal delivery method and may have contributed to significantly less vector particles being delivered to the lungs. However, modifying this technique such that the mouth was covered and the animal maintained upright at a 45 °C angle during vector administration resulted in no apparent loss of vector into the gastrointestinal tract.
Repeat-administration using the intratracheal injection technique may be challenging. The intratracheal injection technique requires a skin incision, which will begin to heal immediately following closure. If re-administration is required within a relatively short timeframe, the same incision site could be re-opened since healing would be minimal. Greater than seven days following closure will result in significant fibrosis of the incision site, which may make re-incision challenging. The second incision may need to be made slightly lateral to the first; however, this could impede proper visualization of the trachea. For this reason, if repeat administration is required, an alternate method of administration is recommended.
Additional studies are required to evaluate the extent and character of inflammation resulting from each technique. Control mice received saline in order to evaluate the effects of each technique at the tissue level. No changes consistent with trauma, inflammation or repair were observed (data not shown). However, histopathology at several time points immediately following each technique would need to be evaluated in order to properly characterize whether tissue damage or local inflammation resulted. The intratracheal injection technique likely resulted in the most inflammation locally, at the site of incision; however, evaluation of an acute immune response may be confounded by a local immune response at the site of the incision. When performing the intubation technique, considerable swelling of the tongue and throat may occur if repeated attempts at insertion of the catheter are required. This is more likely to occur if the individual performing the procedure does not practice on a regular basis. If extensive swelling does occur, the procedure must be halted until the swelling has subsided, usually within 24 to 48 hrs. The local and systemic effects of tissue inflammation should be taken into consideration when selection of method of administration is made.
Lastly, analgesia is required for the intratracheal injection technique. The use of certain analgesics may be contraindicated in a particular study. Examples include opioids in behavioural research  and NSAIDs in cancer research . However, this should not supersede the use of analgesics . If this is the case, it is recommended that an alternate mode of administration be chosen or a different class of analgesics be utilized.
In summary, we evaluated three methods of AAV vector administration to the upper and lower respiratory tract in mice: intranasal, intubation, and intratracheal injection. In addition, we presented a modified-intranasal delivery technique (modified-intranasal). All methods of viral vector administration resulted in transduction of the trachea and nasal epithelium, albeit to a lesser extent with the intubation and intratracheal methods of delivery. Intubation was the only method that resulted in transduction of alveoli in the distal most aspect of the lung. The modified-intranasal technique resulted in the most efficient distribution of vector to the upper and lower respiratory tract with the least amount of inter-animal variability and requiring the least amount of training. Technique selection may greatly influence experimental outcomes and should be selected based on a variety of factors including time, skill, and desired target site.
Six-week-old C57BL/6 male mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (St Constant, QC). Mice were housed in groups of four and food (Teklad Global 14% Protein Rodent Maintenance Diet, Indianapolis, USA) and water (tap) were provided ad libitum. Mice were acclimated to the environment for seven days prior to study initiation.
AAV vector production
Construction of a recombinant AAV vector expressing the reporter gene, human placental alkaline phosphatase (hPLAP), has been described . The packaging plasmid, pDGM6 , which encodes the AAV serotype 6 capsid, was kindly provided by Dr. David Russell (University of Washington). AAV vectors and packaging plasmids were propagated in the SURE 2 (Agilent) strain of Escherichia coli. AAV vectors were produced by co-transfection of HEK 293 cells with genome and packaging plasmid as described previously . AAV vector titers were determined by qPCR as described . Each animal was given 1 × 1011 vg of AJEU3CBA-AP, which expresses hPLAP under a composite promoter (Yu et al., manuscript submitted) comprised of the JE enhancer  and U3 promoter from Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) plus the beta-actin promoter, by one of the four delivery methods. Note that the study was performed using AJEU3CBA-AP vector from one production batch.
Mice were anesthetized (induced and maintained) individually inside a feline nose cone with 2.5% isoflurane (Aerrane, Baxter Corp, Mississauga, ON) delivered in O2 (1 L/min). Immediately prior to delivering the vector, the mouse was removed from the nose cone and placed in dorsal recumbency (Fig. 1a). A preliminary volume of 40 μl of vector was delivered drop wise over the nares and passively inhaled. The mice were permitted to recover from anesthesia for 10 min in a recovery cage and the procedure repeated (total of 80 μl of vector administered).
Mice were anesthetized (induced and maintained) with 2.5% isoflurane in O2 (1 L/min) as described for the intranasal technique. Immediately prior to delivering the vector, the mouse was removed from the nose cone and gently restrained by the scruff at a 45° angle using the right hand and the mouth gently pinched shut using the thumb and forefinger of the left hand so as to prevent mouth breathing. Once the mouse was restrained and the mouth properly covered, a second individual delivered a preliminary volume of 40 μl of vector drop wise over the nares and the drops passively inhaled (Fig. 1b). The mouth was uncovered once all of the liquid was inhaled. The mouse was maintained in this position for approximately 30 s after vector delivery to allow for passive distribution of vector into the lower respiratory tract. The mice were permitted to recover for approximately 10 min in a recovery cage and the procedure repeated (total of 80 μl of vector administered).
Mice were anesthetized (induced and maintained) with 2.5% isoflurane in O2 (1 L/min) and positioned in dorsal recumbency on a metal board oriented at a 45° angle with the rostral end towards the user (Fig. 1c). The upper incisor teeth were hooked under an elastic band attached to the metal board. Mice were exposed to isoflurane throughout the procedure via polyurethane connector tubing placed over the nares. A flexible, high-intensity light source (e.g. Fiber-Lite® high intensity fiber optic flexible illuminator, Dolan-Jenner Industries, MA United States) was positioned 1 cm from the ventral aspect of the sternum. The light shines rostrally through the trachea, allowing for differentiation of the lumen of the trachea from that of the esophagus. A set of serrated blunt nose curved (20° angle) stainless steep forceps (Fine Scientific Tools, item# 11051-10) were used to gently extend the mouse’s tongue out and to the side of the mouth allowing for direct visualization of the epiglottis and larynx. The tongue was held in this position throughout the procedure. Next, blunt stainless steel forceps bent at a 90° angle (Fine Scientific Tools, item# 11052-10) were inserted under the mouse’s tongue and carefully lifted dorsally to allow for greater visualization and access to the trachea. At this point, small adjustments were made to visualize the epiglottis. Using the dominant hand, a 22-gauge catheter was placed between the index and middle finger and stabilized with the thumb in order to direct the catheter through the mouth and larynx into the trachea, stopping just before the bifurcation of the trachea (Fig. 1c). The metal stylette was quickly removed and the polyurethane tubing attached to the catheter opening to allow for continued delivery of isoflurane. Once properly intubated, the polyurethane tube was briefly removed from the end of the catheter, and using a P200 pipette, 80 μl of vector was carefully injected into the catheter as the mouse inhaled. Note that approximately 100 μl of air was drawn up into the pipette tip prior to drawing up 80 μl of vector so as to prevent loss of vector and to promote delivery of the vector deep into the lungs. The mouse was left in this position for 5 min to allow for passive distribution of vector into the lower respiratory tract.
Intratracheal Injection Technique
Mice were anesthetized (induced and maintained) with 2.5% isoflurane in O2 (1 L/min) and positioned in dorsal recumbency on a metal board oriented at a 45° angle with the rostral end away from the user. A 0.5 cm incision was made through the skin, directly cranial to the manubrium. Subcutaneous tissue was carefully dissected away and tissue forceps were used to gently lateralize salivary glands to visualize the trachea (Fig. 1d). Note that applying gentle downward pressure with forceps onto either side of the trachea allows for better visualization of the tracheal rings, which is essential to confirming the appropriate injection location. Using a 29-gauge tuberculin syringe (BD, New Jersey USA) at a 30-45° angle, 80 μl of virus was injected into the trachea. The skin was then closed with 5-0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl, Ethicon, Sommerville, USA) in a single cruciate pattern.
Tissue Preparation and Staining
Mice were euthanized three weeks following vector administration. The lung, trachea, and nasal cavity were harvested and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 24 to 48 hr at room temperature. After washing three times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove the fixative, tissues were transferred to 65 °C PBS, incubated for 1 hr in a water bath at 65 °C to inactivate endogenous alkaline phosphatase and then stained for hPLAP expression as previously described . After gross images were obtained, tissues were paraffin embedded and sectioned at 4 μm.
Genomic DNA extraction and AAV copy number analysis
Five serial sections of 8-micrometer thickness each per sample were taken from each animal using a standard microtome with disposable DNA-RNA free blades. Tissue slices were obtained after trimming to remove tissue exposed to oxygen and to ensure that all five lung lobes were contained within the same plane in the tissue slices. The five tissue slices were placed into a sterile 1.5 ml microfuge tube and genomic DNA was isolated using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was quantified using the Qubit fluorometer and PicoGreen quantification reagents (Invitrogen). Vector genome copy number per ng of genomic DNA was determined by Taqman qPCR starting from 100 ng of mouse gDNA by amplifying the AAV ITRs and mouse beta actin (Actb) as a mouse housekeeping gene. The absolute amount of each gene was obtained by referring to a standard curve consisting of a 10-fold serial dilution of a plasmid containing two copies of the AAV ITR and one copy of the Actb gene sequence (six concentrations, ranging from 10-10−6 copies). Real-time PCR assays were conducted using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Ten μl reactions containing 5 μl 2 × Taqman Master Mix (PerFeCta FastMix II from Quanta BioScience (Cat. No. 95119-250), 1ul of PCR primer/probes (final concentration of primer was 500 nM and probe was 250 nM) and 4 μl of plasmid DNA in serial dilutions. The run conditions were as follows: 30 s at 95 °C polymerase activation step, followed by 35 to 40 cycles of a two-step qPCR (3 s of 95 °C denaturation, 30 s of 60 °C combined annealing/extension). Primers and probes were purchased from IDT and used as follows: AAV ITR, 5′-GGAACCCCTAGTGATGGAGTT-3′ (forward), 5′-CGGCCTCAGTGAGCGA-3′ (reverse), 56-FAM/CACTCCCTC/Zen/T CTGCGCGCTCG/3IABkFQ (probe) ; and mouse Actb PrimeTime Std® qPCR Assay from IDT (Mm.PT.39a.22214843.g).
Data were analyzed with Graphpad Prism version 5 (Graphpad Software) and expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical differences between mean values were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test. Differences between values were considered to be significant with: *P < 0.05.
We would like to acknowledge the technical assistance of Ms. Betty-Anne McBey and staff at the Animal Isolation Unit at the University of Guelph. LAS was the recipient of an Alexander Graham Bell NSERC PhD Scholarship. JCI and LPV were the recipients of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) and an Ontario Veterinary College Fellowship.
Funding for this study was provided by Cystic Fibrosis Canada and the Ontario Lung Association. CF Canada and Ontario Lung Association had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Availability of data and material
The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
SKW conceived of and designed the study. LAS, JCI, DLY, JGDJ, LPV, GAW, and SKW performed the study. JCI, LAS and SKW drafted/revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
The University of Guelph Animal Care Committee approved the animal use protocol, and the facility and procedures are in compliance with the Animals for Research Act of Ontario and the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Keeler AM, Flotte TR. Cell and gene therapy for genetic diseases: inherited disorders affecting the lung and those mimicking sudden infant death syndrome. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23(6):548–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Southam DS, Dolovich M, O’Byrne PM, Inman MD. Distribution of intranasal instillations in mice: effects of volume, time, body position, and anesthesia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;282(4):L833–839.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller MA, Stabenow JM, Parvathareddy J, Wodowski AJ, Fabrizio TP, Bina XR, Zalduondo L, Bina JE. Visualization of murine intranasal dosing efficiency using luminescent Francisella tularensis: effect of instillation volume and form of anesthesia. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halbert C, Lam S, Miller A. High-efficiency promoter-dependent transduction by adeno-associated virus type 6 vectors in mouse lung. Hum Gene Ther. 2007;18(4):344–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aurnhammer C, Haase M, Muether N, Hausl M, Rauschhuber C, Huber I, Nitschko H, Busch U, Sing A, Ehrhardt A, et al. Universal real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of adeno-associated virus serotype 2-derived inverted terminal repeat sequences. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2012;23(1):18–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berrocoso E, Ikeda K, Sora I, Uhl GR, Sánchez-Blázquez P, Mico JA. Active behaviours produced by antidepressants and opioids in the mouse tail suspension test. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16(1):151–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thun MJ, Henley SJ, Patrono C. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as anticancer agents: mechanistic, pharmacologic, and clinical issues. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(4):252–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. In., 8th edn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011.Google Scholar
- Yu DL, Linnerth-Petrik NM, Halbert CL, Walsh SR, Miller AD, Wootton SK. Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus and enzootic nasal tumor virus promoters drive gene expression in all airway epithelial cells of mice but only induce tumors in the alveolar region of the lungs. J Virol. 2011;85(15):7535–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gregorevic P, Blankinship MJ, Allen JM, Crawford RW, Meuse L, Miller DG, Russell DW, Chamberlain JS. Systemic delivery of genes to striated muscles using adeno-associated viral vectors. Nat Med. 2004;10(8):828–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halbert C, Allen J, Miller A. Efficient mouse airway transduction following recombination between AAV vectors carrying parts of a larger gene. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(7):697–701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar