Skip to main content
Download PDF

Physicochemical and biological characterization of 1E10 Anti-Idiotype vaccine

BMC Biotechnology volume 11, Article number: 112 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

1E10 monoclonal antibody is a murine anti-idiotypic antibody that mimics N-glycolyl-GM3 gangliosides. This antibody has been tested as an anti-idiotypic cancer vaccine, adjuvated in Al(OH)3, in several clinical trials for melanoma, breast, and lung cancer. During early clinical development this mAb was obtained in vivo from mice ascites fluid. Currently, the production process of 1E10 is being transferred from the in vivo to a bioreactor-based method.

Results

Here, we present a comprehensive molecular and immunological characterization of 1E10 produced by the two different production processes in order to determine the impact of the manufacturing process in vaccine performance. We observed differences in glycosylation pattern, charge heterogeneity and structural stability between in vivo-produced 1E10 and bioreactor-obtained 1E10. Interestingly, these modifications had no significant impact on the immune responses elicited in two different animal models.

Conclusions

Changes in 1E10 primary structure like glycosylation; asparagine deamidation and oxidation affected 1E10 structural stability but did not affect the immune response elicited in mice and chickens when compared to 1E10 produced in mice.

Background

Anti-idiotype vaccination represents an innovative approach to target tumor-associated antigen-expressing cells. This approach comes directly from Jerne's idiotypic network theory, which postulates that due to the huge potentiality for diversity of the immunoglobulin variable regions, the idiotype repertoire can mimic the universe of self and foreign epitopes [1].

NeuGc-containing gangliosides are attractive targets for cancer immunotherapy because these glycolipids are non-self antigens in humans [2, 3]. In contrast, they have been detected in different human tumors by antibodies and chemical analysis [4–6]. Recent experimental data suggest that N-glycolyl-GM3 ganglioside (NeuGcGM3) is relevant for tumor biology [7].

mAb-1E10 [8] is an IgG1 anti-idiotype (Ab2) mAb obtained by immunizing Balb/c mice with mAb-P3 (Ab1) [9] coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) in the presence of Freund's adjuvant. This Ab2 inhibited the binding of mAb-P3 to NeuGcGM3 ganglioside. mAb-1E10 induced an idiotype-positive antigen-negative (Id+Ag-) Ab3 response in syngeneic, allogeneic and xenogeneic models, where NeuGc-containing gangliosides are normally expressed [8, 10]. In contrast, in chicken, where like in humans NeuGc-containing gangliosides are not expressed in normal tissues, mAb-1E10 was capable of inducing a specific Ab3 antibody response against these gangliosides (Id+Ag+) [10]. Similar results have been obtained in cancer patients immunized with Al(OH)3-precipitated mAb-1E10 [11–14]. The results of these clinical trials evidenced that the vaccine was well-tolerated and immunologically active. In addition, Al(OH)3-precipitated mAb-1E10 immunization induced a pronounced anti-metastatic effect in different murine tumor models [15, 16].

For phase I and II clinical trials, mAb-1E10 was produced in mice ascites, a common practice in the 1990's for small scale antibody production.

We developed a new bioreactor-based method using protein-free media for the production of mAb-1E10. The mAb-1E10 produced from bioreactors (1E10-ST) has to be bioequivalent to ascites fluid-produced 1E10 (1E10-AF) in order to ensure the same effect in the patients. In this case, this bioequivalence has to be demonstrated by a set of physicochemical and biological methods as required by regulatory authorities for characterization of mAbs [17]. As mAb-1E10 is used as an adjuvated vaccine additional characteristics should be taken in to account.

Defining the molecular similarity of two mAbs can be difficult due to their inherent heterogeneity. Apart from the primary sequence, it has been established that glycosylation can be critical for the biological function of mAbs [18–21]. Product-related substances or impurities such as deamidated, isomerized, and oxidized forms, or protein aggregates [22–25] that may be introduced during cloning and production processes can affect, both, the mAbs' tertiary structure and antigen-binding properties. Therefore, a detailed characterization has special relevance for idiotypic vaccines, where the correct spatial atomic distribution in the Complementarity-Determining Regions (CDRs) is critical for their biological activity.

Here, we present the detailed molecular and immunological characterization of mAb-1E10 obtained by two different production methods in order to determine the impact of the manufacturing process in vaccine performance.

Results and Discussion

N-terminal pyroglutamic acid, Asn glycosylation and three deamidation sites common for 1E10-AF and ST, while oxidized methionine found only in 1E10-ST

Primary structure was determined by mass spectrometry using both MALDI-TOF2 and ESI-QTOF for MS2 measurements. The 1E10 amino acid sequence remained unaltered during stirred tank fermentation or production in ascites fluid. Post-translational modifications detected were heavy chain N-terminal pyroglutamic acid, N-glycosylation and the oxidation of methionine 396 (Figure 1), as summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Representative MALDI-TOF spectrum of 1E10 ST (upper panel) and 1E10 AF (lower panel). Sequences containing N-terminal pyroglutamic acid and methionine 396 are shown at their corresponding m/z. The 16 Da mass shifts corresponding to methionine oxidation is illustrated. Mass values corresponding to methionine oxidation were not detected in 1E10 LAM.

Full size image
Table 1 PTMs of mAb-1E10 detected by mass spectrometry.
Full size table

One common post-translational modification observed in mAbs is a cyclized N-terminal glutamine [24, 26–28] when either the heavy and/or light chain sequences begin with glutamine. This reaction involves the cyclization of the N-terminal amine and the subsequent loss of NH3 (17 Da). The gene sequence of the heavy and light chains of many mAbs codes for an N-terminal glutamine, but upon sequencing the N-terminal amino acid is predominantly found as the cyclized pyro-glutamic acid form [24, 27, 29]. Figure 2 shows the MS2 mass spectrum of the N-terminal peptide from heavy chain which bears the cyclized pyro-glutamic acid form of glutamine. Regardless the source, ascites or stirred tank, all the heavy chain N-terminal glutamines were found as pyro-glutamic acid, exclusively.

Figure 2
figure 2

Deconvoluted ms/ms spectrum of heavy chain N-terminal peptide containing pyroglutamic acid. y and b fragment ions assigned are shown in the table and spectrum.

Full size image

Methionine oxidation is a chemical modification known to change the stability and conformation of mAbs through altering CH2 and CH3 domain structure [30, 31]. Figure 1 shows the oxidation in residue Met396, which is a conserved residue located at CH3 of IgG1 antibodies, near to the region of interaction between CH2 and CH3 domains. This oxidation affects the overall charge and stability of the antibody [32].

Deamidation has been shown to be one of the major chemical degradation mechanisms in protein pharmaceuticals during production and storage [33] Three sites of Asn deamidation were found for mAb-1E10, two of these were found in the constant region of the light chain and the other one in the constant region of heavy chain, two of these sites were also observed by Harris et al. [25] studying MMA383 anti-idiotypic antibody.

Very low amounts of aggregates in 1E10-AF and ST, but low molecular weight fragments present only in 1E10-AF

Aggregation analysis (Figure 3) revealed one major peak corresponding to > 98% monomeric 1E10-ST eluting at a retention volume of 7.6 mL. Additionally, a small amount of dimers (< 2%) seemed to be present (vret = 6.9 mL). 1E10-AF showed two major peaks corresponding to > 91% monomeric 1E10 eluting at a vret of 7.7 mL and 7.9% of mAb fragments (vret = 8.6 ml) were determined. Dimers seemed to be < 1% (vret = 6.9 ml).

Figure 3
figure 3

Aggregation analysis of 1E10. HPSEC-TDA chromatograms of 1E10 ST (upper) and 1E10 AF (bottom). Refractive index (red), Log Molecular Weight (black), Right Angle Light Scattering (green) and Log Radius (pale green) signals are shown. 1E10 ST revealed one major peak corresponding to > 98% of monomers and a small amount of dimmers (< 2%). Two major peaks corresponding to > 91% monomeric 1E10 eluting and 7.9% of fragments with masses around 75 kDa were determined for 1E10 AF. Dimmers seemed to be < 1% for this mAb.

Full size image

Aggregates have been reported to cause immunogenicity in a T cell-independent pathway [34]. As aggregates comprise a large number of individual protein molecules, there is the potential for the surface to display a "repetitive" array of epitopes that may be seen by the immune system as resembling the external surfaces of pathogens, triggering the pattern recognition receptors (Toll-like receptors) on APCs. This T-cell-independent pathway leads to an IgM response. However, B cells activated by protein aggregates could function as APCs to recruit T cell help and thereby switch to an IgG response. Although B cells are relatively poor APCs, their presentation potential is enhanced following specific recognition of antigen, thus contributing to initiation of T cell responses [35].

Among the various product-related impurities and degradation products, aggregation is considered a strong risk factor for immunogenicity. It is also the attribute most difficult to control, because there are multiple factors that can lead to the formation of aggregates in a product [36].

Charge profile of 1E10-ST different from 1E10-AF even after C-terminal lysine removal

Cation-exchange chromatography has been introduced to measure charge heterogeneity, in particular caused by lysine variants, more than 15 years ago [37] and now is widely accepted in pharmaceutical analysis. We detected a complex charge variety for both molecules consisting of clusters of charged species (Figure 4). 1E10-AF remained unaltered after enzymatic removal of C-terminal lysine while in 1E10-ST the charged species changed dramatically. The shape of the WCX chromatograms and the changes observed after enzymatic treatment for both 1E10-AF and 1E10-ST suggested a complete processing of C-terminal lysine in 1E10-AF, while the 1E10 obtained from the stirred tank process was found to yield three charged populations of C-terminal lysine processing denoted in Figure 4 as 0 (mAb-1E10 with no C-terminal lysine), 1 (mAb-1E10 with C-terminal lysine partially removed), and 2 (intact mAb-1E10). Charged species present on each cluster (a to e in Figure 4) can result from posttranslational modifications like asparagine deamidation, N-teminal pyroglutamic acid and methionine oxidation determined by mass spectrometry. Harris et al [25] reported similar findings as potential sources for the significant charge heterogeneities in mAb-MMA383, an anti-idiotypic murine IgG1 mAb. In that study C-terminal lysine variants, proteolysis, and deamidation of light chain Asn161 and heavy chain Asn141 were identified to be responsible for mAb-MMA383 charge heterogeneity.

Figure 4
figure 4

WCX chromatograms of 1E10-ST (blue) and 1E10-AF (red). Gradient is represented in white (% A) and blue (% B), units are in the right axis. Inverted chromatograms were recorded after carboxypeptidase b treatment. Charged species are denoted with letters; prefix numbers indicate C-terminal lysine content for each peak. 1E10-ST gave rise to a continuous population of peaks due to the presence of terminal lysine while 1E10-AF showed almost no C-terminal lysine.

Full size image

Same sugar structures attached to Fc of 1E10-AF and ST but not their relative amount

Detailed N-glycosylation was investigated by N-glycan mapping of fluorescence-labeled oligosaccharides released from the mAbs. The 2-AB-labeled glycans, released from mAbs by PNGase F, were separated using hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) with fluorescence detection for quantification. The N-glycans identified were core-fucosylated biantennary-complex-type oligosaccharides. Using GU values [38], the most intense peaks were identified as agalactosylated core-fucosylated biantennary (G0F) and monogalactosylated core-fucosylated biantenary (G1F) structures, respectively. Minor peaks with higher retention times were determined to be core-fucosylated mono- and di-sialylated biantennary structures, respectively.

Oligosaccharide structures were determined to be similar for both mAb molecules. Six major glycans (G0F, G1Fa, G1Fb, G2F, G2FS1 and G2FS2) were identified and quantified. Figure 5a shows a relative quantification based on relative peak areas of 2AB-labeled HPLC chromatograms. As expected, G0F, G1F and G2 were the most highly represented glycoforms in both mAb-1E10, while sialylated glycoforms were less. Glycosylation patterns of 1E10-ST and AF were determined to be different in their ratios of glycan structures. However, they exhibited the same glycan structures attached to Asn297 of heavy chain. Compared to 1E10-AF, bioreactor-produced mAb contained more G0 and displayed a two-fold increase in sialylated forms. The glycan pattern of 1E10-AF can be a result from enzymatic trimming of oligosaccharides by glycosidases present in ascites fluid. However, the 1E10-ST glycan pattern may have resulted from differences in specific production rates of hybridoma cells during fermentation. At high production rates, mAb oligosaccharides result incomplete, while at low production rates, more complete structures are produced.

Figure 5
figure 5

Comparison of HPLC separation and quantification of 2-AB-labeled glycans released from 1E10 ST and AF. a) Relative contents of 2-AB-labeled glycans quantified by peak integration of HPLC-fluorescence signals.

Full size image

IgG glycosylation plays a crucial role in antibody effector functions like cell-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC), and FcγR recognition. As the intended use of mAb-1E10 is to be administered as a vaccine, adsorbed to alum, and injected subcutaneously, it is very unlikely that Fc-mediated effector functions plays a critical role in the biological activity of this mAb. However, conformation of IgG is affected by glycosylation [32]. On the other hand, it is well known that murine cells can attach highly immunogenic sugar epitopes like αGal-Gal and N-glycolyl sialic acid [21]. As the N-glycan structures of 1E10-AF and ST were identical, and so far none of these epitopes has been detected, differences in immunogenicity and safety between 1E10-AF and ST are not expected.

Reduced thermal stability of 1E10-ST as compared to 1E10-AF

Thermally induced structural transitions in the secondary structure monitored by infrared spectroscopy have been previously described [39–42] to analyze the unfolding behavior of proteins and to determine a melting temperature (TmFTIR). As structural transition to intermolecular β-sheets occur regardless of the initial secondary structure composition of the native protein, these bands can be used to monitor protein aggregation in aqueous solution and solid state [33]. The melting point can be determined by plotting the ratio of the intensities of characteristic amide I bands vs. temperature [43]. 1E10-AF and 1E10-ST displayed a different behavior under temperature stress (Figure 6). While 1E10-AF remained in solution, 1E10-ST started melting at approximately 73°C. One explanation for the lower thermal stability of 1E10-ST might be the oxidized Met396 in 1E10-ST, which was not detectable in 1E10-AF. This residue is located on CH3 domain, near to the interaction site of CH2 and CH3, therefore, it may be hypothesized that oxidation of this residue can affect the three dimensional structures of CH3 and CH2 and herewith the overall stability of the antibody. In summary, the thermal stability for mAb-1E10 obtained in stirred tank fermentation was lower than mAb-1E10 obtained in ascites fluid, supported by several factors including methionine oxidation, differences in glycan patterns, charge state heterogeneities, and protein conformation.

Figure 6
figure 6

Thermal transition curves of the 1E10-AF (dotted line) and 1E10-ST (solid line). Curves were obtained by plotting the ratio of the intensities of the increasing to the decreasing amide I band vs. temperature. 1E10-ST showed different thermal stability in respect to 1E10-AF.

Full size image

Similar Ab3 antibody responses elicited by 1E10-AF and ST vaccination in chicken

We compared the specificity of the antibodies generated in chicken by immunization with 1E10-AF and ST. Antibody responses were tested in the sera obtained from the animals after the immunization. All chicken developed a strong humoral response against the whole mAb-1E10 molecules. The titers of Ab3 responses were higher than 1/400,000, as measured by ELISA (Figure 7). The reactivity of animal sera with the murine isotype-matched mAb was also tested, and a higher binding to the immunizing mAb-1E10 was observed in the chicken sera independently of the source of anti-idiotype mAb (Figure 7) (p < 0:001, one way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons tests). This result demonstrated the immunodominance of the idiotype of both mAb-1E10 products in the antibody response induced in immunized chicken. Moreover, there was no difference in the serological antibody titers obtained when the animals were immunized with 1E10-AF or 1E10-ST (p > 0.05) (Figure 7), evidencing the same immunogenicity for these two mAb-1E10 molecules. Thus, the structural changes observed did neither affect overall immunogenicity nor the idiotypic immunodominance reported for this mAb [10].

Figure 7
figure 7

Specificity of Ab3 antibodies to 1E10-AF and 1E10-ST in sera from immunized chicken determined by ELISA. Chicken sera at different dilutions were bound to microtiter plates coated with 1E10-AF, 1E10-ST or isotype-matched control ior C5 mAb (10 μg/mL) and the reaction was developed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated rabbit anti-chicken IgY. Sera were obtained seven days after animals received the third dose of each 1E10 mAb preparation. The data represent mean ± SD of maximal titers in chicken sera of each group.(p < 0:001, one way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test). Similar letters means no difference (p > 0.05). Baseline serological antibodies were undetectable (< 100 titer).

Full size image

Co-administration of 1E10-AF/Alum or 1E10 ST/Alum with low-dose Cyclophosphamide induced anti-tumor effects in a mammary carcinoma model

As shown in Figure 8, no antitumor effect was observed when low-dose Cyclophosphamide or 1E10-ST/Alum was administered alone at the evaluated dose. Interestingly, when 1E10-AF/Alum or 1E10-ST/Alum was co-administered with low-dose Cyclophosphamide F3II mammary carcinoma growth was reduced significantly. No statistical differences in tumor growth between these groups of mice were determined and the observed anti-tumor responses were comparable with the effect upon co-administration of the standard high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer based on 60 mg/m2 of Doxorubicin and 600 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide.

Figure 8
figure 8

Antitumor effects of 1E10-AF/Alum and 1E10-ST/Alum co-administrated with low-dose Cyclophosphamide in a mammary carcinoma model. F3II tumor-bearing mice were immunized subcutaneously with 100 μg of 1E10-ST/Alum alone (open triangle); 1E10-AF/Alum (open circle) or 1E10-ST/Alum (open square) combined with 150 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide i.v. 7 days after the tumor inoculation. Both combinations reduced significantly the F3II mammary carcinoma growth. This response was comparable with the administration of high-dose chemotherapy based on 60 mg/m2 of Doxorubicin and 600 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide (full triangle). * Significant differences (P < 0.05) using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's multiple comparison tests.

Full size image

In vivo experiments resulted in similar immunogenicity, idiotypic dominance, and antitumor effects of 1E10-AF and 1E10-ST. Thus, the observed posttranslational modifications did most likely not affect the Fab structure, as the biological activity of 1E10 vaccine was not altered. Moreover, deamidation of asparagine and methionine oxidation were restricted to Fc regions in 1E10 mAb, far away from CDRs. Therefore, it remains unlikely that these amino acid modifications might affect the spatial conformation of the respective CDRs enabling structural mimicry as postulated for anti-idiotypic mAbs.

Conclusions

Effector functions of classic therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can be divided in Fab-dependent functions and Fc-dependent functions. The Fab region contains variable regions of light and heavy chains which are responsible for antigen recognition, while the Fc region mediates effector functions like CDC, ADCC and FcγR recognition. Therefore, any change in their physicochemical profile could eventually affect the efficacy of mAbs.

It is well known that physicochemical properties of recombinant proteins can be heavily affected during changes in the production process. Thus, it is mandatory to carefully investigate the similarities and differences of therapeutic mAbs when the production process has been changed. Comparability must be demonstrated by an array of physicochemical and biological methods as required by the regulatory authorities.

Regulatory aspects regarding physicochemical characteristics of idiotypic monoclonal antibodies used for idiotypic vaccination bear some differences from classic therapeutic mAbs. For idiotypic mAbs, Fc-related functions are not critical for the intended biological effect as they are administered adsorbed to alum and via intra-dermis. Antigen mimicry is restricted to variable region CDRs which are located in Fab.

Here, we demonstrate that change of 1E10 production from ascites to bioreactor generates a molecule with different physicochemical properties. Changes were observed in the degree of asparagine deamidation, C-terminal lysine processing, methionine oxidation, and glycosylation pattern. All these modifications had an impact on the charge profile and conformation of the 1E10 molecule, as revealed by an altered thermal stability of 1E10-ST. However, these changes did not affect its biological activity. The idiotypic dominance was not affected, which represents the intended effect for an idiotypic vaccine. Thus, the transfer in the production process of 1E10 idiotypic mAb from ascites to bioreactor improved product safety without affecting its biological activity. Furthermore, our study demonstrated a number of physicochemical properties that do not affect the biological activity of 1E10 idiotypic vaccine.

Methods

1E10-AF

Hybridoma cell line was cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 5% of fetal calf serum (Invitrogen, USA), 5 mM of glutamine (Invitrogen, USA), 2.546 g/L of HEPES (Sigma, USA), 2.18 g/L of sodium bicarbonate (Sigma, USA) and 1 mL/L of 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma, USA). Mouse ascites fluid from BALB/c mice was sterilized by depth filtration and 1E10 mAb was purified using the following chromatographic sequence: ion exchange by DEAE Sepharose, affinity chromatography using Protein A Sepharose, and Sepharose G-25 gel filtration chromatography (all from GE Heathcare, USA).

1E10-ST

Supernatant of 1E10-ST was obtained from the stirred tank bioreactors hybridoma cell culture using a proprietary protein free medium in perfusion mode. Clarified 1E10 supernatant was purified by protein A affinity chromatography using ProSep vA ultra matrix (Millipore, USA, followed by cation exchange chromatography (SP Sepharose FF, GE Healthcare, USA) and Sepharose G-25 size exclusion chromatography (GE Healthcare, USA).

Aluminum hydroxide-precipitated 1E10-AF and 1E10-ST mAb formulations

Purified mAb-1E10 molecules were aseptically mixed at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml with 5 mg/ml of aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant (Superfos Biosector, Frederikssund, Denmark). The mixture was gently stirred for 3 h at room temperature. The aluminum hydroxide-precipitated mAb was stored in aliquots at 4°C until use.

Amino acid sequence and posttranslational modifications (PTMs) analysis

Lyophilized mAbs (50 μg) obtained from each process were dissolved in 50 μL of 25 mM of Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.5 with 8 M Urea. After addition of DTT to a final concentration of 50 mM, the mixture was flushed with N2 and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. Following this step the sample was cooled to room temperature, acrylamide was added to a final concentration of 100 mM and the mixture incubated for 20 min in the dark at room temperature. The samples were diluted 8 times to a final concentration of 1 M Urea. After addition of 1 μg trypsin, the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The reaction was stopped by addition of 2% (v/v) TFA in water. The peptide mixture was analyzed directly by MALDI-MS and ESI-MS.

Analyses of peptides by MALDI-TOF2 MS were performed on an Axima Performance mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Biotech, Japan) equipped with a 337 nitrogen laser and a collision-induced dissociation (CID) chamber with helium gas. Analyses were carried out in reflector mode (Mr < 5000) with delayed extraction. The instrument was calibrated externally using ProteoMass Peptide Calibration kit (Sigma), low mass gate value of 700 was selected. Data analyses were performed using Shimadzu Biotech Launchpad software (Shimadzu Biotech, Japan)

Digested peptides were purified using CleanUp Pippet Tips C18 (Agilent, USA) as recommended by the manufacturer. Sample was deposited on the MALDI plate by the dried-droplet sample preparation method [44] using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), 10 μg uL-1, in TFA-water-acetonitrile (0.1:30:70, v/v).

ESI-MS and MS2 were performed in the positive ion mode on a Micromass Q-TOF II mass spectrometer (Manchester, UK) equipped with a Z-spray sample introduction system. Acquisition and analysis of the data was performed using MassLynx software v 4.0 (Micromass, Manchester, UK). For calibration, a sodium and cesium iodide mixture solution was used.

Aggregation analysis

High performance-size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) of 100 μl sample was performed as standard using a 7.8 × 300 mm TSKgel G2000SWXL column protected by a 6 × 40 mm guard column (Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart, Germany) on a HP1100 analytical chromatography system (Hewlett-Packard, San Jose, CA, USA) at 0.5 ml/min in 100 mM sodium phosphate pH 6.6, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% NaN3. Using a combination of the built-in UV detector measuring at 280 nm and a sequential refractive index (RI), intrinsic viscosity (IV), and right-angle light scattering detection (TDA 302, Viscotek Corp., Houston, TX, USA) the MW and hydrodynamic radius of eluting peaks were determined. Detector calibration was performed using bovine serum albumin from Sigma (A7638) weighed out at 1.0 mg/ml.

Thermal stability of mAb-1E10 by FTIR

Infrared spectra were recorded using a Tensor 27 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). Protein samples were prepared in a BioATR cell connected to a thermostat. For each spectrum, a 120 scan interferogram was collected in single beam mode at 4 cm-1 resolution. Reference spectra were recorded under identical conditions with only the reference buffer in the cell. To determine the melting temperature (TmFTIR), temperature-dependent spectra were acquired every 5°C in a ranging from 25 to 90°C. Recorded infrared spectra were analyzed by the Protein Dynamics software for Opus 4.2 (Bruker Optics) and displayed as vector-normalized second-derivative amide I spectra. Melting temperature was calculated by plotting the 1639 cm-1 to 1625 cm-1 signal ratio vs. temperature.

Analysis of charge heterogeneity

1E10-ST and 1E10-AF (approximately 100 μg each) were diluted five-fold with buffer A (10 mM sodium acetate pH 5) loaded onto a ProPac10 WCX column (Dionex, Houston, USA) and eluted with buffer B (10 mM sodium acetate, 1 M NaCl pH 5). The gradient was performed in two steps, from 8 to 13% B in 5 min and 13 to 20% B in 20 min. Protein elution was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm.

The mAb solutions (1.5 mg/ml in 15 mM sodium phosphate pH 7) were treated with carboxypeptidase B (Boehringer, Germany) at an enzyme-to-substrate ratio of 1:5000 (w/w) at 25°C. Reaction was stopped by adding 1 μl of acetic acid. Digested samples were analyzed by WCX HPLC as described above.

N-Glycosylation analysis

N-glycans were released by digestion with peptide-N4-(N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminyl) asparagine amidase F (PNGase F, BioLabs, Beverly, MA, USA), using the method described by the manufacturer. Briefly, mAbs-1E10 were denatured at 100°C for 10 min in 0.1% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol. Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) was added to a final concentration of 1% before enzyme addition. The digestion was carried out at a ratio of 5 U of PNGase F per milligram of glycoprotein at 37°C for 2 h. The protein was precipitated by adding three volumes of cold ethanol and the mixture was kept at -20°C for 30 min. The oligosaccharides were concentrated under vacuum and subjected to 2-aminobenzamide (2AB) labeling.

Oligosaccharides were fluorescently labeled with 2AB by reductive amination [45]. Briefly, oligosaccharides were dissolved in 5 μL DMSO-acetic acid (7:3) containing 2AB (0.35 M) and 1 M NaCNBH3 and incubated at 65°C for 2 h. Excess of fluorophore was removed by 2 h vertical chromatography on Whatman 3 MM paper using acetonitrile. The paper bearing the oligosaccharide signal (application point) was cut. The oligosaccharides were eluted from the paper by adding double-distilled water (2 × 500 μL). The eluate was filtrated in a syringe through a 0.45 μm PTFE filter (Millex-LCR, Millipore) and then concentrated under vacuum.

Normal-phase HPLC (NP-HPLC) of the labeled portion was performed using a TSK-Gel Amide-80 4.6 × 250 mm column (Tosoh BioSep, Japan) on a separation module (Merck-Hitachi, Japan) equipped with a fluorescence detector. Labeled N-glycans were separated by a linear gradient of 20-58% of 50 mM ammonium formiate pH 4.4 against acetonitrile over 152 min at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Samples were injected in 80% acetonitrile. The fluorescence detection was carried out using an excitation wavelength of 330 nm and an emission wavelength of 420 nm [46]. The elution positions of the N-glycans were determined in glucose units (GU) by comparison with a standard dextran hydrolysate 2AB labeled (dextran ladder) [47].

Animals

Female BALB/c/cenp mice (ten weeks old) and Leghorn chicken (10 weeks old) were purchased from the Center for Laboratory Animal Breeding (CENPALAB, Havana, Cuba). Animals were housed under conventional conditions with free access to water and food and maintained in accordance with the guidelines stipulated by the Animal Subject Committee Review Board of CENPALAB. Animal studies were performed with approval from CENPALAB's and CIM's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees.

Antitumor experiments

The sarcomatoid mammary carcinoma cell line F3II is a highly invasive and metastatic variant established from a clone of a spontaneous BALB/c mouse mammary tumor. F3II cells grow as spindle-cell carcinoma tumors with a high local invasiveness and a 90-100% incidence of lung metastases [48]. F3II cells were maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM 41500, Gibco, BRL) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 80 mg/ml Gentamycin, and 20 mg/ml tetracycline in monolayer culture.

All mice were injected subcutaneously with 2 × 105 F3II cells in the right flank. Seven days after tumor inoculation, the animals were separated in different groups and injected as follows: subcutaneously with normal saline; subcutaneously with 100 μg of 1E10-ST/Alum; intravenously with 150 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide (Cy-150); intravenously with 150 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide and subcutaneously with 100 μg of 1E10-AF/Alum; intravenously with 150 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide and subcutaneously with 100 μg of 1E10-ST/Alum or intravenously with 60 mg/m2 of Doxorubicin (Dox) and 600 mg/m2 of Cyclophosphamide (Cy-600). The time of appearance of local tumors was monitored by palpation and further confirmed by histopathology. In all cases, tumors were diagnosed as spindle-cell carcinomas. Tumor size was measured with a caliper twice a week.

Induction of anti-anti-idiotype antibody (Ab3) response

Chicken were immunized subcutaneously with 100 μg of 1E10 vaccine in the days 0, 7 and 21. Blood extractions were done before and one week after the last immunization (day 28).

The presence of anti-1E10 antibodies in chicken sera was determined in a solid-phase ELISA Polystyrene Maxisorp microtiter plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 50 μl of a solution of 10 μg/ml of mAb-1E10 in carbonate buffer pH 9.6 and incubated overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, the plates were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with PBS containing 1% BSA. Then, diluted serum samples were added to each well and the plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Chicken antibodies were detected with an AP-conjugated rabbit anti-chicken IgY (Sigma). The plates were washed four times and the reaction was developed with a substrate solution consisting of 1 mg/ml p-nitrophenylphosphate (Sigma) in diethanolamine buffer, pH 9.8. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm in an ELISA reader (Tekan, Salzburg, Austria).

The highest serum dilution giving OD values ≥0.2 and being at least three times the value corresponding to the preimmune serum at the same dilution was considered as titer. Assays were performed in triplicate for each sample and the coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 15%. The ODs of the blanks were less than 0.1.

References

  1. Jerne NK: Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann Immunol (Paris). 1974, 125C (1-2): 373-389.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olson MV, Varki A: Sequencing the chimpanzee genome: insights into human evolution and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4 (1): 20-28. 10.1038/nrg981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Irie A, Koyama S, Kozutsumi Y, Kawasaki T, Suzuki A: The molecular basis for the absence of N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (25): 15866-15871. 10.1074/jbc.273.25.15866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malykh YN, Schauer R, Shaw L: N-Glycolylneuraminic acid in human tumours. Biochimie. 2001, 83 (7): 623-634. 10.1016/S0300-9084(01)01303-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marquina G, Waki H, Fernandez LE, Kon K, Carr A, Valiente O, Perez R, Ando S: Gangliosides expressed in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1996, 56 (22): 5165-5171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miyake M, Hashimoto K, Ito M, Ogawa O, Arai E, Hitomi S, Kannagi R: The abnormal occurrence and the differentiation-dependent distribution of N-acetyl and N-glycolyl species of the ganglioside GM2 in human germ cell tumors. A study with specific monoclonal antibodies. Cancer. 1990, 65 (3): 499-505. 10.1002/1097-0142(19900201)65:3<499::AID-CNCR2820650321>3.0.CO;2-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Leon J, Fernandez A, Mesa C, Clavel M, Fernandez LE: Role of tumour-associated N-glycolylated variant of GM3 ganglioside in cancer progression: effect over CD4 expression on T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006, 55 (4): 443-450. 10.1007/s00262-005-0041-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vazquez AM, Perez A, Hernandez AM, Macias A, Alfonso M, Bombino G, Perez R: Syngeneic anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibodies to an anti-NeuGc-containing ganglioside monoclonal antibody. Hybridoma. 1998, 17 (6): 527-534. 10.1089/hyb.1998.17.527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vazquez AM, Alfonso M, Lanne B, Karlsson KA, Carr A, Barroso O, Fernandez LE, Rengifo E, Lanio ME, Alvarez C, et al: Generation of a murine monoclonal antibody specific for N-glycolylneuraminic acid-containing gangliosides that also recognizes sulfated glycolipids. Hybridoma. 1995, 14 (6): 551-556. 10.1089/hyb.1995.14.551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernandez AM, Rodriguez M, Lopez-Requena A, Beausoleil I, Perez R, Vazquez AM: Generation of anti-Neu-glycolyl-ganglioside antibodies by immunization with an anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody: A self versus non-self-matter. Immunobiology. 2005, 210 (1): 11-21. 10.1016/j.imbio.2005.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alfonso M, Diaz A, Hernandez AM, Perez A, Rodriguez E, Bitton R, Perez R, Vazquez AM: An anti-idiotype vaccine elicits a specific response to N-glycolyl sialic acid residues of glycoconjugates in melanoma patients. J Immunol. 2002, 168 (5): 2523-2529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diaz A, Alfonso M, Alonso R, Saurez G, Troche M, Catala M, Diaz RM, Perez R, Vazquez AM: Immune responses in breast cancer patients immunized with an anti-idiotype antibody mimicking NeuGc-containing gangliosides. Clin Immunol. 2003, 107 (2): 80-89. 10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00036-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neninger E, Diaz RM, de la Torre A, Rives R, Diaz A, Saurez G, Gabri MR, Alonso DF, Wilkinson B, Alfonso AM, et al: Active immunotherapy with 1E10 anti-idiotype vaccine in patients with small cell lung cancer: report of a phase I trial. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007, 6 (2): 145-150. 10.4161/cbt.6.2.3574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hernandez AM, Toledo D, Martinez D, Grinan T, Brito V, Macias A, Alfonso S, Rondon T, Suarez E, Vazquez AM, et al: Characterization of the antibody response against NeuGcGM3 ganglioside elicited in non-small cell lung cancer patients immunized with an anti-idiotype antibody. J Immunol. 2008, 181 (9): 6625-6634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diaz Y, Gonzalez A, Lopez A, Perez R, Vazquez AM, Montero E: Anti-ganglioside anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody-based cancer vaccine induces apoptosis and antiangiogenic effect in a metastatic lung carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009, 58 (7): 1117-1128. 10.1007/s00262-008-0634-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuentes D, Avellanet J, Garcia A, Iglesias N, Gabri MR, Alonso DF, Vazquez AM, Perez R, Montero E: Combined therapeutic effect of a monoclonal anti-idiotype tumor vaccine against NeuGc-containing gangliosides with chemotherapy in a breast carcinoma model. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009, 120 (2): 379-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reichert JM, Beck A, Iyer H: European Medicines Agency workshop on biosimilar monoclonal antibodies: July 2, 2009, London, UK. MAbs. 2009, 1 (5): 394-416. 10.4161/mabs.1.5.9630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jefferis R: Recombinant antibody therapeutics: the impact of glycosylation on mechanisms of action. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009, 30 (7): 356-362. 10.1016/j.tips.2009.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jefferis R: Glycosylation as a strategy to improve antibody-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009, 8 (3): 226-234. 10.1038/nrd2804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaneko Y, Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV: Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation. Science. 2006, 313 (5787): 670-673. 10.1126/science.1129594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung CH, Mirakhur B, Chan E, Le QT, Berlin J, Morse M, Murphy BA, Satinover SM, Hosen J, Mauro D, et al: Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358 (11): 1109-1117. 10.1056/NEJMoa074943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paborji M, Pochopin NL, Coppola WP, Bogardus JB: Chemical and physical stability of chimeric L6, a mouse-human monoclonal antibody. Pharm Res. 1994, 11 (5): 764-771. 10.1023/A:1018948901599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vlasak J, Bussat MC, Wang S, Wagner-Rousset E, Schaefer M, Klinguer-Hamour C, Kirchmeier M, Corvaia N, Ionescu R, Beck A: Identification and characterization of asparagine deamidation in the light chain CDR1 of a humanized IgG1 antibody. Anal Biochem. 2009, 392 (2): 145-154. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.05.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck A, Bussat MC, Zorn N, Robillard V, Klinguer-Hamour C, Chenu S, Goetsch L, Corvaia N, Van Dorsselaer A, Haeuw JF: Characterization by liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry of monoclonal anti-IGF-1 receptor antibodies produced in CHO and NS0 cells. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005, 819 (2): 203-218. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.06.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris RJ, Kabakoff B, Macchi FD, Shen FJ, Kwong M, Andya JD, Shire SJ, Bjork N, Totpal K, Chen AB: Identification of multiple sources of charge heterogeneity in a recombinant antibody. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001, 752 (2): 233-245. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00548-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gadgil HS, Pipes GD, Dillon TM, Treuheit MJ, Bondarenko PV: Improving mass accuracy of high performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of intact antibodies. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17 (6): 867-872. 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.02.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis DA, Guzzetta AW, Hancock WS, Costello M: Characterization of humanized anti-TAC, an antibody directed against the interleukin 2 receptor, using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry by direct infusion, LC/MS, and MS/MS. Anal Chem. 1994, 66 (5): 585-595. 10.1021/ac00077a003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Werner WE, Wu S, Mulkerrin M: The removal of pyroglutamic acid from monoclonal antibodies without denaturation of the protein chains. Anal Biochem. 2005, 342 (1): 120-125. 10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang S, Ionescu R, Peekhaus N, Leung JY, Ha S, Vlasak J: Separation of post-translational modifications in monoclonal antibodies by exploiting subtle conformational changes under mildly acidic conditions. J Chromatogr A. 2005, 1217 (42): 6496-6502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu D, Ren D, Huang H, Dankberg J, Rosenfeld R, Cocco MJ, Li L, Brems DN, Remmele RL: Structure and stability changes of human IgG1 Fc as a consequence of methionine oxidation. Biochemistry. 2008, 47 (18): 5088-5100. 10.1021/bi702238b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu H, Gaza-Bulseco G, Xiang T, Chumsae C: Structural effect of deglycosylation and methionine oxidation on a recombinant monoclonal antibody. Mol Immunol. 2008, 45 (3): 701-708. 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang S, Ionescu R, Peekhaus N, Leung JY, Ha S, Vlasak J: Separation of post-translational modifications in monoclonal antibodies by exploiting subtle conformational changes under mildly acidic conditions. J Chromatogr A. 2010, 1217 (42): 6496-6502. 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.08.044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manning MC, Patel K, Borchardt RT: Stability of protein pharmaceuticals. Pharm Res. 1989, 6 (11): 903-918. 10.1023/A:1015929109894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh SK: Impact of product-related factors on immunogenicity of biotherapeutics. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010, 100 (2): 354-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. De Groot AS, Scott DW: Immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Trends Immunol. 2007, 28 (11): 482-490. 10.1016/j.it.2007.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bee JS, Davis M, Freund E, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW: Aggregation of a monoclonal antibody induced by adsorption to stainless steel. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010, 105 (1): 121-129. 10.1002/bit.22525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris RJ: Processing of C-terminal lysine and arginine residues of proteins isolated from mammalian cell culture. J Chromatogr A. 1995, 705 (1): 129-134. 10.1016/0021-9673(94)01255-D.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quintero O, Montesino R, Cremata JA: Two-dimensional mapping of 8-amine-1,3,6-naphthalene trisulfonic acid derivatives of N-linked neutral and sialyloligosaccharides. Anal Biochem. 1998, 256 (1): 23-32. 10.1006/abio.1997.2420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dobson CM: Experimental investigation of protein folding and misfolding. Methods. 2004, 34 (1): 4-14. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Takeda N, Kato M, Taniguchi Y: Pressure- and thermally-induced reversible changes in the secondary structure of ribonuclease A studied by FT-IR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1995, 34 (17): 5980-5987. 10.1021/bi00017a027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. van de Weert M, Haris PI, Hennink WE, Crommelin DJ: Fourier transform infrared spectrometric analysis of protein conformation: effect of sampling method and stress factors. Anal Biochem. 2001, 297 (2): 160-169. 10.1006/abio.2001.5337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Becktel WJ, Schellman JA: Protein stability curves. Biopolymers. 1987, 26 (11): 1859-1877. 10.1002/bip.360261104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Matheus S, Friess W, Mahler HC: FTIR and nDSC as analytical tools for high-concentration protein formulations. Pharm Res. 2006, 23 (6): 1350-1363. 10.1007/s11095-006-0142-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Karas M, Hillenkamp F: Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal Chem. 1988, 60 (20): 2299-2301. 10.1021/ac00171a028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bigge JC, Patel TP, Bruce JA, Goulding PN, Charles SM, Parekh RB: Nonselective and efficient fluorescent labeling of glycans using 2-amino benzamide and anthranilic acid. Anal Biochem. 1995, 230 (2): 229-238. 10.1006/abio.1995.1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Guile GR, Wong SY, Dwek RA: Analytical and preparative separation of anionic oligosaccharides by weak anion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography on an inert polymer column. Anal Biochem. 1994, 222 (1): 231-235. 10.1006/abio.1994.1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Guile GR, Rudd PM, Wing DR, Prime SB, Dwek RA: A rapid high-resolution high-performance liquid chromatographic method for separating glycan mixtures and analyzing oligosaccharide profiles. Anal Biochem. 1996, 240 (2): 210-226. 10.1006/abio.1996.0351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Alonso DF, Farias EF, Urtreger A, Ladeda V, Vidal MC, Bal De Kier Joffe E: Characterization of F3II, a sarcomatoid mammary carcinoma cell line originated from a clonal subpopulation of a mouse adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1996, 62 (4): 288-297. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199608)62:4<288::AID-JSO14>3.0.CO;2-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and Funding

The authors like to thank Dr. Aniel Sánchez for his critical revision of the paper.

YJM's stay at Salzburg University for HPSEC-TDA and FTIR experiments was funded by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds Travel Grant.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Molecular Immunology, 216 St and 15th Ave., Atabey Siboney, Playa, P.O. Box 16040, Havana, 11600, Cuba

    Yoan J Machado, Yamilet Rabasa, Adolfo Castillo & Kathya R de la Luz

  2. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 31st Ave and 158 St, Playa, P.O. Box 6162, Havana, 10600, Cuba

    Raquel Montesinos, José Cremata & Vladimir Besada

  3. Centro Nacional Para la producción de Animales de Laboratorio, La Habana, Cuba

    Ana M Vázquez

  4. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Allergy Diagnosis and Therapy, University of Salzburg, Austria

    Dasha Fuentes & Martin Himly

Authors
  1. Yoan J Machado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yamilet Rabasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raquel Montesinos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. José Cremata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vladimir Besada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dasha Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adolfo Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kathya R de la Luz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ana M Vázquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Martin Himly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoan J Machado.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

YJM conceived the experiments, carried out the MALDI-MS and charge heterogeneity determinations, the FTIR experiments, the immunogenicity studies, performed the overall data treatments and has drafted the manuscript. YR performed the ELISA determinations for all the immunogenicity studies. RM and JC performed glycans structure analysis; VB performed ESI-QTOF determinations and supported YJM in mass spectrometry data analysis. DF performed antitumor experiments and supported YJM in experimental design of animal experiments. AMV, AC, KRL and MH has been involved in the experiments planning, the drafting of the manuscript and for revising it critically for content and general supervision of the project. MH performed HPSEC-TDA determinations. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Machado, Y.J., Rabasa, Y., Montesinos, R. et al. Physicochemical and biological characterization of 1E10 Anti-Idiotype vaccine. BMC Biotechnol 11, 112 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-112

Keywords

  • Charge Heterogeneity
  • Shimadzu Biotech
  • Chicken Seron
  • Idiotypic Vaccine
  • Glycan Pattern

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us