Skip to main content

Integrating vectors for genetic studies in the rare Actinomycete Amycolatopsis marina



Few natural product pathways from rare Actinomycetes have been studied due to the difficulty in applying molecular approaches in these genetically intractable organisms. In this study, we sought to identify more integrating vectors, using phage int/attP loci, that would efficiently integrate site-specifically in the rare Actinomycete, Amycolatopsis marina DSM45569.


Analysis of the genome of A. marina DSM45569 indicated the presence of attB-like sequences for TG1 and R4 integrases. The TG1 and R4 attBs were active in in vitro recombination assays with their cognate purified integrases and attP loci. Integrating vectors containing either the TG1 or R4 int/attP loci yielded exconjugants in conjugation assays from Escherichia coli to A. marina DSM45569. Site-specific recombination of the plasmids into the host TG1 or R4 attB sites was confirmed by sequencing.


The homologous TG1 and R4 attB sites within the genus Amycolatopsis have been identified. The results indicate that vectors based on TG1 and R4 integrases could be widely applicable in this genus.


Streptomyces bacteria are widely exploited for their abundant bioactive natural products [1]. However, after decades of exploitation, the rate of discovery of new Streptomyces-derived bioactive products has declined, and interest has grown in other potential non-Streptomycete sources, such as the rare Actinomycetes [2, 3].

Amongst rare Actinomycetes, the Amycolatopsis genus is of particular interest for its production of critically important antibiotics such as vancomycin [4] and rifamycin [5], as well as a diverse range of active natural products [6,7,8]. The publicly available NCBI database contains nearly 90 genomes of Amycolatopsis strains, covering more than 40 species from this genus. Similar to Streptomyces, the genome of each Amycolatopsis contains averagely over 20 secondary metabolic gene clusters [9]. The mining of these metabolic clusters offers excellent potential for novel antibiotic discovery.

Phage-encoded serine and tyrosine integrases catalyse site-specific integration of a circularised phage genome into the host chromosome as part of the process to establish a lysogen. DNA integration mediated by serine integrases occurs between short (approximately 50 bp) DNA substrates that are located on the phage genome (the phage attachment site attP), and the host genome (the bacterial attachment site attB). The product of attP x attB recombination is an integrated phage genome flanked by two new sites, attL and attR, each of which contains half-sites from attP and attB. During phage induction, integrase in the presence of a recombination directionality factor (RDF) again mediates site-specific recombination, but this time between attL and attR, to excise the phage genome, which can then be replicated during a lytic cycle. The mechanism of recombination and the factors that control integration versus excision have been elucidated in recent years [10,11,12].

Integrating vectors based on the Streptomyces phage ϕC31 integrase and attP locus are best known and most widely used in Actinomycete genome engineering [13,14,15,16], and in addition to the phage recombination machinery (int/attP), integrating vectors contain a replicon for maintenance in Escherichia coli, an oriT for conjugal transfer and a marker or markers for selection in E. coli and the recipient. They are powerful genome engineering tools that act in an efficient, highly controllable and predictable way [17].

Using serine integrase-mediated recombination, these integrating vectors require no additional phage or host functions for integration, which is an especially important feature when they are used in other organisms that cannot be infected by the phages. This property makes serine integrase-based vectors promising tools for use in various systems [10, 18]. However, the use of these integration vectors has not been fully explored in rare Actinomycetes, e.g. Amycolatopsis. There is one reported example of a conjugation system based on ϕC31 integrase in Amycolatopsis japonicum MG417-CF17 [19], and it has been reported that other Amycolatopsis species lack ϕC31 attB sites in their chromosomes [20]. The ϕBT1 attB sites have been more commonly identified in Amycolatopsis. A vector based on ϕBT1 int/attP has been successfully transferred into Amycolatopsis mediterranei [21]. Furthermore, electroporation remains the most widely applied method for transfer of integrative plasmids into this genus, rather than conjugation [20, 21].

In this paper, we chose to study A. marina DSM45569, a species isolated from an ocean-sediment sample collected in the South China Sea [22]. Since the marine environment has been assumed to offer an as yet mostly untapped treasure of chemical biodiversity [23], we are quite interested in natural product discovery from A. marina. We explored the application of bacterial genetic engineering using serine integrases and developed conjugative and integrating vectors for use in this species. We present evidence suggesting that these vectors could be applied to other species in this genus, thus opening up the prospect for versatile genetic manipulation of Amycolatopsis.


Identification of attB-like sequences from the genome of A. marina DSM45569

The primers used in this study were listed in Table 1. The sequences of attB sites recognised by a variety of integrases (φC31 [24], φJoe [25], Bxb1 [26], R4 [27], SPBc [28], SV1 [29], TG1 [30] and TP901 [31]) were used in BLAST searches of the genome sequence of A. marina DSM45569 (NCBI Genome Database NZ_FOKG00000000). The most significant hits for R4 and TG1 attB sites had the highest identities and lowest E-value (Table 2). The recognised R4 attB-like site is located within a gene predicted to encode a fatty-acyl-CoA synthase (SFB62308.1), and the TG1 attB site is located within a gene predicted to code for a putative succinyldiaminopimelate transaminase (WP_091671332.1). The BLAST analysis was extended to other species of Amycolatopsis to assess the conservation of these attB sites in the genus (Fig. 1). Both R4 and TG1 attB sites were highly conserved relative to the attB sites originally identified from Streptomyces parvulus [32] (84% for R4 integrase) and Streptomyces avermitilis [30] (62% for TG1 integrase).

Table 1 Oligonucleotides used in this study
Table 2 The original attB sites for integrases and results of BLAST search
Fig. 1

Alignment of R4 and TG1 attB sites in A. marina DSM45569 and other Amycolatopsis species. a) GenBank accession nos. of DNA sequences: Amycolatopsis balhimycina (ARBH01000005.1), Amycolatopsis japonica (NZ_CP008953.1), Amycolatopsis mediterranei (NC_022116.1), Amycolatopsis orientalis (NZ_CP016174.1), Amycolatopsis rifamycinica (NZ_JMQI01000006.1), Amycolatopsis rubida (NZ_FOWC01000001.1), Amycolatopsis tolypomycina (NZ_FNSO01000004.1), Amycolatopsis xylanica (NZ_FNON01000002.1), and S. parvulus (CP015866.1); b) GenBank accession nos. of DNA sequences: Amycolatopsis alba (NZ_KB913032.1), Amycolatopsis azurea (MUXN01000005.1), A. balhimycina (ARBH01000007.1), A. japonica (NZ_CP008953.1), Amycolatopsis lurida (FNTA01000004.1), A. mediterranei (NC_022116.1), A. orientalis (NZ_CP01674.1), Amycolatopsis thermoflava (AXBH01000004.1), and S. avermitilis (NC_003155.5)

A. marina attB-like sequences for TG1 and R4 are both active in in vitro recombination

In each recombination reaction, substrates containing attP and the putative attB site were mixed in cognate pairs with different concentrations of purified R4 or TG1 integrase in the corresponding buffer and incubated overnight at 30 °C, as described in Methods. The expected recombination events and the nature of the products are shown in Fig. 2a. TG1 catalysed recombination between the substrates more efficiently than R4 (Fig. 2b). As expected because neither phage is an Amycolatopsis phage, the recombination efficiencies for each integrase were observably better when the Streptomyces attB sites were used (Fig. 2c) compared to the A. marina attB sites (Fig. 2b), particularly for TG1 integrase. Nevertheless, the presence of recombination activity indicated that both A. marina attB sites were functional and were likely to be active integration sites for integrative conjugation vectors.

Fig. 2

In vitro recombination. (a) Recombination substrates and their expected products. (b) In vitro recombination between DNA fragments containing TG1 attBAm (1627 bp) and TG1 attP (2471 bp; left), and R4 attBAm (1854 bp) and R4 attP (990 bp; right). The expected products of the TG1 integrase-mediated reaction were a 4.1 kb DNA fragment containing the attRAm site, and a 53 bp fragment containing attLAm (not observed). For the R4 integrase recombination reaction, the expected products were a 2.8 kb fragment containing attRAm, and a 51 bp attLAm fragment (not observed). (c) In vitro recombination between DNA fragments containing TG1 attBSa (1035 bp) and TG1 attP (2471 bp; left), and R4 attBSp (1855 bp) and R4 attP (990 bp; right). The expected products were a 3.5 kb fragment containing attRSa for the TG1 reaction, and a 2.8 kb fragment containing attRSp for the R4 reaction. M: Fast DNA Ladder (NEB, USA)

In vivo integration

A. marina DSM45569 is unable to grow in the presence of apramycin, so integrating plasmids pHG4 and pJH1R4, containing the apramycin resistance determinant aac(3)IV, were constructed. Following the standard Streptomyces conjugation protocol (see Methods), a frequency of approximately 160 exconjugants/108 spores was obtained for the transfer of pHG4 (encoding TG1 integrase), while the conjugation efficiency of pJH1R4 (R4 integrase) was only 20 exconjugants/108 spores (Table 3). For each integration, six exconjugants were picked at random and streaked on SM (soya mannitol) agar containing apramycin. Genomic DNA was then prepared and used as the template in PCR reactions, in which the primer pairs of TG1-attL-Am-for/rev and R4-attL-Am-for/rev were used to test for the occurrence of recombination at the expected TG1 and R4 attB sites (Fig. 3). All PCR reactions using exconjugants as templates gave the expected band sizes. Sequencing (GATC, Germany) of the PCR products with the primers TG1-attL-Am-for and R4-attL-Am-for confirmed that the plasmids had integrated into the predicted attB sites for TG1 or R4 integrase within A. marina DSM45569 (Fig. 4).

Table 3 Conjugation efficiency of pHG4 and pJH1R4 in different species
Fig. 3

PCR confirmation of site-specific integration in the exconjugants. (a) Integration of pHG4 into the chromosome. (b) PCR (using primers TG1-attL-Am-for/rev) of the expected TG1 attL-containing fragment from A. marina DSM45569:pHG4. M: Fast DNA Ladder. Colonies 1 to 6 are independent exconjugants. (c) Integration of pJH1R4 into the chromosome. (d) PCR (using primers R4-attL-Am-for/rev) of the expected R4 attL-containing fragment from A. marina DSM45569:pJH1R4. M: Fast DNA Ladder. Colonies 1 to 6 are independent exconjugants

Fig. 4

The insertion sites of R4 (a) and TG1 (b) integration plasmids in A. marina DSM45569. Sequencing (using primers R4-attL-Am-for or TG1-attL-Am-for) of PCR products containing attL from exconjugants validated the site-specific recombination of the R4 and TG1 attB sites in A. marina DSM45569 after the introduction of pHG4 or pJH1R4, respectively


The lack of effective genetic engineering tools is considered one of the greatest hindrances in the search for new natural products from rare Actinomycetes [33,34,35]. Previous studies in rare Actinomycete species have focused mainly on the use of the well-characterised ϕC31-based integration vectors, and have mostly overlooked tools based on other phage integrases [36,37,38]. Additionally, the easy-handling conjugation methods used widely in Streptomyces gene transfer have shown little success in rare Actinomycetes, including species in the genus Amycolatopsis, so direct transformation with plasmids [39,40,41], or electroporation, has been the long-preferred method of gene transfer for species in this genus [5, 42,43,44]. However, the growing interest in the use of serine integrases for synthetic biology applications [10] has led to further research into expanding the pool of available enzymes and their potentials as genetic tools [45,46,47]. Therefore, within this study, we explored whether integrating vectors based on eight serine integrases could be employed for the genetic engineering of A. marina DSM45569. Sequence analysis of the A. marina DSM45569 genome identified close matches to the attB sites used by TG1 and R4 integrases. Although conjugation frequencies were relatively low, integrating plasmids based on the TG1 and R4 recombination systems have been successfully integrated into the expected attB sites in A. marina DSM45569. Conservation between the attB sites for TG1 and R4 in a number of Amycolatopsis species is high, suggesting that plasmids with the integration systems from these phages should be widely useful in this genus, including the species which have garnered much interest as natural product producers, such as Amycolatopsis balhimycina [40], Amycolatopsis orientalis [20], and A. mediterranei [39].

As is common with serine integrase-mediated recombination, the attB sites in A. marina are located within open reading frames and potentially disrupt the gene. The TG1 attBAm site is located within a gene predicted to encode a putative succinyldiaminopimelate transaminase (WP_091671332.1), and the R4 attBAm site is located within a gene predicted to code for a fatty-acyl-CoA synthase (SFB62308.1). Compared to the wild-type (unintegrated) strain, the strains with integrated pHG4 or pJH1R4 did not show any difference in growth. However, further study is required to investigate the effects of TG1 or R4 plasmid recombination on both primary and secondary metabolism as, for example, the integration of ϕC31 integrase-based plasmids has been shown to have pleiotropic effects on bacterial physiology [48].

Currently, the following methods have been used to establish a gene transfer system in Amycolatopsis species: protoplast transformation, direct transformation of mycelia, electroporation, electroduction, and conjugation [41]. Among them, direct transformation and electroporation are most popular. While for the conjugation methods which have been widely used in Streptomyces species, there are few publications on conjugative transfer of vectors based on serine integrases in Amycolatopsis: pSET152 based on ϕC31 into A. japonicum MG417-CF17 (conjugation frequency = 2.4 × 104 exconjugants/108 spores) [19] and pDZL802 based on ϕBT1 into A. mediterranei U32 (4 × 103 exconjugants/108 spores) [21]. In this study, we successfully integrated plasmids into the attB sites for TG1 and R4 integrases by conjugation, which supplements the potential gene transfer methods that could be used in the genus Amycolatopsis, broadens the applicability of gene transfer systems except for the ones based on ϕC31 and ϕBT1 in previous publications, and will definitely facilitate the genetic manipulation of Amycolatopsis. Although the recombination efficiencies were lower for TG1 and R4, the conjugation conditions could be further optimised to achieve better conjugation results, or the application of integration based vectors for direct transformation of mycelia could be explored since the integrative vectors, for example, pMEA100 [39] and pMEA300 [49], used in direct transformation are based on integrase and corresponding attP site as well.


In conclusion, we have identified highly conserved sequences of the attB sites for TG1 and R4 integrases within the genus Amycolatopsis and demonstrated their use in conjugative DNA transfer. The A. marina DSM45569 attB sites showed slightly lower recombination efficiencies in vitro than the previously identified attB sites from Streptomyces spp. However, this slight reduction is not enough by itself to explain the order of magnitude reductions in conjugation frequencies observed with A. marina compared to Streptomyces spp. (Table 3). Optimising conjugation conditions could increase the conjugation frequencies further. Alternatively, efficiently used attB sites for the widely used vectors, such as those based on ϕC31 int/attP could be incorporated into the Amylcolatopsis genome using TG1 or R4 integrating plasmids as described here. In short, this work shows that integrative vectors are viable and promising tools for the genetic engineering of rare Actinomycetes.


Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Plasmid propagation and subcloning was conducted using E. coli Top10 (F- mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) φ80lacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 nupG recA1 araD139 Δ(ara-leu)7697 galE15 galK16 rpsL(StrR) endA1 λ). Plasmid conjugations from E. coli to A. marina DSM45569 were carried out using E. coli ET12567(pUZ8002) containing the plasmid to be transferred as the donor [50, 51], and conjugations from E. coli to S. coelicolor and S. lividans were used as control. E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) or on LB agar at 37 °C.

A. marina DSM45569 was purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Germany), and maintained on SM agar plates at 30 °C. Harvested spores were maintained long-term in 20% glycerol at -80 °C. Conjugations were plated on SM agar plates containing 10 mM MgCl2, and ISP2 medium [52] was used for the preparation of genomic DNA [51].

DNA manipulation

E. coli transformation and gel electrophoresis were carried out as described previously [53]. Genomic DNA preparation from Streptomyces was performed following the salting out procedure in the Streptomyces manual [51]. Plasmids from E. coli were prepared using QIAprep® Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was carried out using Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. DNA samples were purified by the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany).

Plasmid construction

The integrating plasmid pHG4 contains the TG1 int/attP locus and the apramycin-resistance gene (aac(3)IV) for selection (Fig. 5a). The fragment containing oriT, aac(3)IV and TG1 int/attP was amplified from plasmid pBF20 [54] using the primer pair pHG4-for/pHG4-rev. The fragment was joined via In-Fusion cloning to the 3344 bp HindIII-PacI fragment from pBF22 [54] (containing the E. coli plasmid replication origin, the bla gene encoding resistance to ampicillin and the actII-orf4/act1p expression cassette) to form the plasmid pHG4.

Fig. 5

Plasmids used in this study. The primer binding sites are indicated. (a) Integrating plasmids pHG4 and pJH1R4; (b) DNA substrate attPs amplified from pHG4 and pJH1R4; (c) PCR template plasmid pHG1; (d) DNA substrate attBs amplified from pHG1

To construct the integrating plasmid pJH1R4 (Fig. 5a), pSET152 [55] was cut with AatII and PvuI to remove the ϕC31 attP site and integrase gene. R4 phage lysate was used as the template in a PCR with the primers pJH1R4-for and pJH1R4-rev to amplify the R4 attP site and integrase coding region. The PCR product was joined to the AatII-PvuI fragment from pSET152 via In-Fusion cloning.

The plasmid pHG1 (Fig. 5c) was used as the template in PCR to amplify attB-containing sequences (Fig. 5d) for in vitro recombination assays. This plasmid was initially constructed for the expression of EryF. The eryF gene was amplified from Saccharopolyspora erythraea BIOT-0666 genomic DNA using the primer pair pHG1A-for/pHG1A-rev, and inserted by In-Fusion cloning into pBF20 [54] cut with NheI and PacI to form the plasmid pHG1A. The 3785 bp fragment containing the ϕC31 int/attP and hygromycin resistance gene was amplified from plasmid pBF27C [54], using the primer pair pHG1-for and pHG1-rev. Plasmid pHG1A was digested with XbaI and NheI, and the 5668 bp fragment was ligated with the 3785 bp PCR fragment from pBF27C by In-Fusion cloning to give the plasmid pHG1.

In vitro recombination assays

In vitro recombination assays were performed using PCR-amplified DNA fragments containing the attB and attP attachment sites located at the ends. Recombination between the attP and attB sites joined the two fragments to give a product whose length was almost the sum of the substrates (Fig. 2a). To generate the attB-containing substrates, the forward primer, TG1-attB-Am-for, contained the closest match in the A. marina genome to the characterised TG1 attB site from S. avermitilis, TG1 attBSa [30] (Fig. 1). TG1-attB-Am-for also had a sequence identical to the 3′ end of the act1p element from plasmid pHG1, which was used as a template for PCR (Fig. 5c). Similarly, the forward primer R4-attB-Am-for contained the closest match in the A. marina genome to the characterised R4 attB site from S. parvulus, R4 attBSp [32] (Fig. 1). R4-attB-Am-for also had a sequence identical to the 3′ end of ActII-orf4 element from the template plasmid pHG1 (Fig. 5d). Forward primers TG1-attB-Sa-for and R4-attB-Sp-for were used to create positive control recombination substrates containing the TG1 and R4 attB sites originally found in S. avermitilis [30] and S. parvulus [32] respectively. The reverse primer used to generate all the attB-containing substrates (attB-rev) was located within the hyg gene of pHG1; the amplified products were 1627 bp (TG1 attBAm), 1035 bp (TG1 attBSa), 1854 bp (R4 attBAm) and 1855 bp (R4 attBSp). The DNA fragments containing the attP sites were prepared as follows; the TG1-attP fragment (2471 bp) was amplified using the primer pair TG1-attP-for/TG1-attP-rev with pHG4 as the template, and the R4-attP fragment (990 bp) was amplified using the primer pair R4-attP-for/R4-attP-rev with pJH1R4 as the template (Fig. 5b). Note that other than the attB and attP sites, none of the substrates contained any DNA that should interact specifically with the integrases. Moreover, each fragment was designed to be easily identifiable by molecular weight.

The integrases were purified as described previously [27, 56]. All recombination reactions were in 20 μl final volume. Recombination reactions of TG1 substrates were carried out in TG1 RxE buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 25 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 10 mM spermidine, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin [BSA]) [57], and recombination reactions of R4 substrates were carried out in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM spermidine, 5 mM CaCl2 and 50 mM DTT [27]. Integrase was added at the concentrations indicated. Recombination substrates were used at 50 ng each per reaction. Reactions were incubated at 30 °C overnight and then heated (10 min, 75 °C) to denature integrase. The reaction mixtures were loaded on a 0.8% agarose gel in Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer (90 mM Tris base, 90 mM boric acid and 2 mM EDTA) containing ethidium bromide for electrophoretic separation.



Bovine serum albumin


Polymerase chain reaction


Recombination directionality factor


Soya Mannitol




  1. 1.

    Jones SE, Ho L, Rees CA, Hill JE, Nodwell JR, Elliot MA. Streptomyces exploration is triggered by fungal interactions and volatile signals. Elife. 2017;6:e21738.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zarins-Tutt JS, Barberi TT, Gao H, Mearns-Spragg A, Zhang L, Newman DJ, Goss RJM. Prospecting for new bacterial metabolites: a glossary of approaches for inducing, activating and upregulating the biosynthesis of bacterial cryptic or silent natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2016;33(1):54–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jose PA, Jebakumar SRD. Non-streptomycete actinomycetes nourish the current microbial antibiotic drug discovery. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:240.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jung HM, Kim SY, Moon HJ, Oh DK, Lee JK. Optimization of culture conditions and scale-up to pilot and plant scales for vancomycin production by Amycolatopsis orientalis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77(4):789–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li C, Liu X, Lei C, Yan H, Shao Z, Wang Y, Zhao G, Wang J, Ding X. RifZ (AMED_0655) is a pathway-specific regulator for rifamycin biosynthesis in Amycolatopsis mediterranei. J Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(8):e03201–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Xu X, Han L, Zhao L, Chen X, Miao C, Hu L, Huang X, Chen Y, Li Y. Echinosporin antibiotics isolated from Amycolatopsis strain and their antifungal activity against root-rot pathogens of the Panax notoginseng. Folia Microbiol. 2018;64(2):171–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hashizume H, Iijima K, Yamashita K, Kimura T, S-i W, Sawa R, Igarashi M. Valgamicin C, a novel cyclic depsipeptide containing the unusual amino acid cleonine, and related valgamicins a, T and V produced by Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF4. J Antibiot. 2018;71(1):129–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li X, Wu X, Zhu J, Shen Y. Amexanthomycins A–J, pentangular polyphenols produced by Amycolatopsis mediterranei S699∆ rifA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(2):689–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Adamek M, Alanjary M, Sales-Ortells H, Goodfellow M, Bull AT, Winkler A, Wibberg D, Kalinowski J, Ziemert N. Comparative genomics reveals phylogenetic distribution patterns of secondary metabolites in Amycolatopsis species. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):426.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fogg PC, Colloms S, Rosser S, Stark M, Smith MC. New applications for phage integrases. J Mol Biol. 2014;426(15):2703–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Colloms SD, Merrick CA, Olorunniji FJ, Stark WM, Smith MC, Osbourn A, Keasling JD, Rosser SJ. Rapid metabolic pathway assembly and modification using serine integrase site-specific recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;42(4):e23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Smith MC. Phage-encoded serine integrases and other large serine recombinases. In: Craig NL, Chandler M, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM, Rice PA, Sandmeyer SB, editors. Mobile DNA III. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2015. p. 253–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Saha S, Zhang W, Zhang G, Zhu Y, Chen Y, Liu W, Yuan C, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Zhang L. Activation and characterization of a cryptic gene cluster reveals a cyclization cascade for polycyclic tetramate macrolactams. Chem Sci. 2017;8(2):1607–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sosio M, Giusino F, Cappellano C, Bossi E, Puglia AM, Donadio S. Artificial chromosomes for antibiotic-producing actinomycetes. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(3):343–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hong Y, Hondalus MK. Site-specific integration of Streptomyces ΦC31 integrase-based vectors in the chromosome of Rhodococcus equi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;287(1):63–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thorpe HM, Smith MC. In vitro site-specific integration of bacteriophage DNA catalyzed by a recombinase of the resolvase/invertase family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(10):5505–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rutherford K, Van Duyne GD. The ins and outs of serine integrase site-specific recombination. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;24:125–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baltz RH. Streptomyces temperate bacteriophage integration systems for stable genetic engineering of actinomycetes (and other organisms). J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39(5):661–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stegmann E, Pelzer S, Wilken K, Wohlleben W. Development of three different gene cloning systems for genetic investigation of the new species Amycolatopsis japonicum MG417-CF17, the ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid producer. J Biotechnol. 2001;92(2):195–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lei X, Zhang C, Jiang Z, Li X, Shi Y, Liu M, Xie Y, Wang L, Hong B. Complete genome sequence of Amycolatopsis orientalis CPCC200066, the producer of norvancomycin. J Biotechnol. 2017;247:6–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li C, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zhao G, Ding X. Conjugation of ϕBT1-derived integrative plasmid pDZL802 in Amycolatopsis mediterranei U32. Bioengineered. 2017;8(5):549–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bian J, Li Y, Wang J, Song FH, Liu M, Dai HQ, Ren B, Gao H, Hu X, Liu ZH. Amycolatopsis marina sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from an ocean sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59(3):477–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Romano S, Jackson S, Patry S, Dobson A. Extending the “one strain many compounds”(OSMAC) principle to marine microorganisms. Mar Drugs. 2018;16(7):244.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Combes P, Till R, Bee S, Smith MC. The Streptomyces genome contains multiple pseudo-attB sites for the φC31-encoded site-specific recombination system. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(20):5746–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fogg PC, Haley JA, Stark WM, Smith MC. Genome integration and excision by a new Streptomyces bacteriophage, ϕJoe. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;83(5):e02767–16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ghosh P, Pannunzio NR, Hatfull GF. Synapsis in phage Bxb1 integration: selection mechanism for the correct pair of recombination sites. J Mol Biol. 2005;349(2):331–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Takamasa M, Yayoi H, Yang YZ, Tomoyasu N, Munehiko A, Hideo T, Makoto S. In vivo and in vitro characterization of site-specific recombination of actinophage R4 integrase. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2011;57(1):45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lazarevic V, Düsterhöft A, Soldo B, Hilbert H, Mauel C, Karamata D. Nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus subtilis temperate bacteriophage SPβc2. Microbiology. 1999;145(5):1055–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fayed B, Younger E, Taylor G, Smith MC. A novel Streptomyces spp. integration vector derived from the S. venezuelae phage, SV1. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14(1):51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Morita K, Yamamoto T, Fusada N, Komatsu M, Ikeda H, Hirano N, Takahashi H. In vitro characterization of the site-specific recombination system based on actinophage TG1 integrase. Mol Gen Genomics. 2009;282:607–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Christiansen B, Johnsen M, Stenby E, Vogensen F, Hammer K. Characterization of the lactococcal temperate phage TP901-1 and its site-specific integration. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(4):1069–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shirai M, Nara H, Sato A, Aida T, Takahashi H. Site-specific integration of the actinophage R4 genome into the chromosome of Streptomyces parvulus upon lysogenization. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(13):4237–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li X, Zhou X, Deng Z. Vector systems allowing efficient autonomous or integrative gene cloning in Micromonospora sp. strain 40027. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(6):3144–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Marcone GL, Carrano L, Marinelli F, Beltrametti F. Protoplast preparation and reversion to the normal filamentous growth in antibiotic-producing uncommon actinomycetes. J Antibiot. 2010;63:83–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wolf T, Gren T, Thieme E, Wibberg D, Zemke T, Pühler A, Kalinowski J. Targeted genome editing in the rare actinomycete Actinoplanes sp. SE50/110 by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Biotechnol. 2016;231:122–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wagner N, Oßwald C, Biener R, Schwartz D. Comparative analysis of transcriptional activities of heterologous promoters in the rare actinomycete Actinoplanes friuliensis. J Biotechnol. 2009;142:200–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Anzai Y, Iizaka Y, Li W, Idemoto N, Tsukada SI, Koike K, Kinoshita K, Kato F. Production of rosamicin derivatives in Micromonospora rosaria by introduction of d-mycinose biosynthetic gene with ΦC31-derived integration vector pSET152. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;36:1013–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kim DY, Huang YI, Choi SU. Cloning of metK from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus ATCC31121 and effect of its high expression on antibiotic production. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21(12):1294–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Madoń J, Hütter R. Transformation system for Amycolatopsis (Nocardia) mediterranei: direct transformation of mycelium with plasmid DNA. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(20):6325–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kilian R, Frasch H-J, Kulik A, Wohlleben W, Stegmann E. The VanRS homologous two-component system VnlRSAb of the glycopeptide producer Amycolatopsis balhimycina activates transcription of the vanHAXSc genes in Streptomyces coelicolor, but not in A. balhimycina. Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22(6):499–509.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Malhotra S, Lal R. The genus Amycolatopsis: indigenous plasmids, cloning vectors and gene transfer systems. Indian J Microbiol. 2007;47(1):3–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kumari R, Singh P, Lal R. Genetics and genomics of the genus Amycolatopsis. Indian J Microbiol. 2016;56(3):233–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Shen Y, Huang H, Zhu L, Luo M, Chen D. Type II thioesterase gene (ECO-orf27) from Amycolatopsis orientalis influences production of the polyketide antibiotic, ECO-0501 (LW01). Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34(11):2087–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lee K, Lee B, Ryu J, Kim D, Kim Y, Lim S. Increased vancomycin production by overexpression of MbtH-like protein in Amycolatopsis orientalis KFCC 10990P. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016;63(3):222–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mandali S, Dhar G, Avliyakulov NK, Haykinson MJ, Johnson RC. The site-specific integration reaction of Listeria phage A118 integrase, a serine recombinase. Mob DNA. 2013;4(2).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yoon B, Kim I, Nam JA, Chang HI, Ha CH. In vivo and in vitro characterization of site-specific recombination of a novel serine integrase from the temperate phage EFC-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;473:336–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yang L, Nielsen AAK, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, McClune CJ, Laub MT, Lu TK, Voigt CA. Permanent genetic memory with> 1-byte capacity. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1261–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Talà A, Damiano F, Gallo G, Pinatel E, Calcagnile M, Testini M, Fico D, Rizzo D, Sutera A, Renzone G. Pirin: a novel redox-sensitive modulator of primary and secondary metabolism in Streptomyces. Metab Eng. 2018;48:254–68.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Vrijbloed J, Madoń J, Dijkhuizen L. Transformation of the methylotrophic actinomycete Amycolatopis methanolica with plasmid DNA: stimulatory effect of a pMEA300-encoded gene. Plasmid. 1995;34(2):96–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    MacNeil D. Characterization of a unique methyl-specific restriction system in Streptomyces avermitilis. J Bacteriol. 1988;170(12):5607–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kieser T, Bibb M, Buttner M, Chater K, Hopwood D. Practical Streptomyces genetics. Norwich: the John Innes Foundation; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Shirling E, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1966;16(3):313–40.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Fayed B, Ashford DA, Hashem AM, Amin MA, El Gazayerly ON, Gregory MA, Smith MC. Multiplexed integrating plasmids for engineering the erythromycin gene cluster for expression in Streptomyces and combinatorial biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(24):8402–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wilkinson CJ, Hughes-Thomas ZA, Martin CJ, Bohm I, Mironenko T, Deacon M, Wheatcroft M, Wirtz G, Staunton J, Leadlay PF. Increasing the efficiency of heterologous promoters in actinomycetes. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;4(4):417–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rowley P, Smith M, Younger E, Smith MC. A motif in the C-terminal domain of ϕC31 integrase controls the directionality of recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(12):3879–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Morita K, Morimura K, Fusada N, Komatsu M, Ikeda H, Hirano N, Takahashi H. Site-specific genome integration in alphaproteobacteria mediated by TG1 integrase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93(1):295–304.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council project grant BB/K003356/1, and Buvani Murugesan acknowledges the receipt of a summer studentship from the Department of Biology, University of York. These funding organisations were not involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Author information




HG designed the study, performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. BM participated in TG1 experiments. JH constructed pJH1R4 and purified R4 integrase. SKE purified TG1 integrase. WMS and MCMS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, H., Murugesan, B., Hoßbach, J. et al. Integrating vectors for genetic studies in the rare Actinomycete Amycolatopsis marina. BMC Biotechnol 19, 32 (2019).

Download citation


  • Rare Actinomycetes
  • Amycolatopsis
  • Integrating vectors
  • TG1 integrase
  • R4 integrase