- Research article
- Open Access
In planta production of ELPylated spidroin-based proteins results in non-cytotoxic biopolymers
© Hauptmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015
- Received: 9 October 2014
- Accepted: 6 February 2015
- Published: 19 February 2015
Spider silk is a tear-resistant and elastic biopolymer that has outstanding mechanical properties. Additionally, exiguous immunogenicity is anticipated for spider silks. Therefore, spider silk represents a potential ideal biomaterial for medical applications. All known spider silk proteins, so-called spidroins, reveal a composite nature of silk-specific units, allowing the recombinant production of individual and combined segments.
In this report, a miniaturized spidroin gene, named VSO1 that contains repetitive motifs of MaSp1 has been synthesized and combined to form multimers of distinct lengths, which were heterologously expressed as elastin-like peptide (ELP) fusion proteins in tobacco. The elastic penetration moduli of layered proteins were analyzed for different spidroin-based biopolymers. Moreover, we present the first immunological analysis of synthetic spidroin-based biopolymers. Characterization of the binding behavior of the sera after immunization by competitive ELISA suggested that the humoral immune response is mainly directed against the fusion partner ELP. In addition, cytocompatibility studies with murine embryonic fibroblasts indicated that recombinant spidroin-based biopolymers, in solution or as coated proteins, are well tolerated.
The results show that spidroin-based biopolymers can induce humoral immune responses that are dependent on the fusion partner and the overall protein structure. Furthermore, cytocompatibility assays gave no indication of spidroin-derived cytotoxicity, suggesting that recombinant produced biopolymers composed of spider silk-like repetitive elements are suitable for biomedical applications.
- Spider silk
- Synthetic spidroin
- Atomic force microscopy
Recent biomedical developments in the field of tissue engineering require protein-based biomaterials as scaffolds that have been optimized for substantial extensibility, long-term stability, self-assembly and low energy loss . Further important properties are biocompatibility and economical production, as well as purification systems, which could be provided by plant-based production of elastin-like peptide (ELP) fusion proteins, referred to as ELPylated proteins [2,3]. Since ancient times, spider silk has been known for its extraordinary properties. Bygone cultures used the secretory product of the spider spinning glands. For example, Ancient Greeks were aware of the boosting effect for wound healing and used spider webs to cover bleeding lesions . Today, spider silk is known to promote the regeneration of nerves , and supports the proliferation of fibroblasts and keratinocyte cell lines . In addition to these fascinating features, the lightweight and flexible biopolymer spider silk joins mechanical properties such as high toughness, tensile strength and stiffness that competes with man-made polymers .
Spider silks produced by orb-web-weaving spiders are composed of proteins that are commonly termed spidroins. An intensively investigated silk is the major ampullate silk, which is used by spiders as a structural element to build the web frame and the safety line; therefore, it is also called dragline silk. The well-known structure of major ampullate silk consists of two proteins called major ampullate spidroin 1 (MaSp1) and major ampullate spidroin 2 (MaSp2) . The first partial sequence information from MaSp1 of Nephila clavipes was published in 1990 and revealed a high repetitive primary structure . The protein consists of poly(A) blocks alternating with GGX (X = Y, L, Q) and (GA)n sequence motifs . Currently, the high number of repetitive peptide motifs in the core sequence is known as the key feature of spidroins. Clearly there is a strong relationship between the secondary structure, based on the unique motifs in the primary protein structure, and the outstanding properties of spider silks. The alanine-rich peptide regions form a β-sheet that provides remarkable strength to major ampullate silk . Conversely, the high toughness arises from the glycine-rich peptide motifs, which likely induce the formation of β-turns and 310 helices [7,12]. For the spidroin MaSp1, a molecular weight of up to 320 kDa is reported . It is assumed that the size of spider silk proteins is a key factor in defining their mechanical properties, because all characterized native spider silks consist of proteins with high molecular weights .
The usage of native spider silk on a larger scale is not economically profitable. Currently, heterologous spidroin production is the method of choice to satisfy the demand of recombinant spider silk for research. For this purpose, the most widely used host system is the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Here, spider silk protein modules of mainly a low molecular weight, approximately 50 kDa, were produced [14-17]. However, heterologous expression of recombinant spider silk proteins in E. coli was found to be rather inefficient owing to the low production rate and instability of the spider silk gene . Because of the highly repetitive nature of the proteins, DNA deletion in the spider silk gene, as well as transcription and translation errors were often observed during the reproduction of recombinant E. coli harboring the gene . Furthermore, translational errors of proteins were caused by a depletion of the t-RNA pool owing to the high alanine and glycine content. Recently, expression of high molecular weight spider silk derivatives up to 285 kDa has been achieved by optimizing the glycyl-tRNA amount and glycine synthesis . Other expression systems used for heterologous spidroin production are yeast , plants [22,23], insects  or mammalians .
The knowledge of the molecular structure of spider silk has inspired researchers to use the repeated modules of silks to develop synthetic spidroins. In addition, an approach using a synthetic gene can avoid the abovementioned difficulties during heterologous expression of spider silk proteins. The adaption of the codon usage to the t-RNA pool of the intended host system is a considerable advantage of synthetic genes. Furthermore, restriction sites necessary for cloning into expression vectors can be attached during gene synthesis and, therefore, prevent additional PCR reactions that often cause errors with highly repetitive genes. In previous studies, the synthetic spider silk protein SO1, which shows a 94% homology to MaSp1 of the golden silk spider, was successfully expressed in plants (Nicotiana tabacum, Solanum tuberosum) . For further investigations, this synthetic spidroin was fused to 100 repeats of ELP to facilitate the purification of plant-produced spider silk-like proteins . In addition, for other spider silk proteins ELPylation is a powerful technology for easy and economical purification .
In general, low immunogenicity is anticipated for highly repetitive proteins such as spider silk derivatives and ELP . Here, we designed various synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins consisting of several repetitive motifs of SO1 and accordingly MaSp1 termed (VSO1)n-100xELP. We have designed these artificial fusion proteins to produce material for tissue engineering with suitable mechanical properties, low immunogenicity and cytocompatibility. After heterologous expression in plants, the spidroin-based fusion proteins were purified by a scalable and economical downstream processing procedure. Furthermore, these synthetic spidroins were used to analyze their mechanical properties and immunogenicity. By producing recombinant spider silks in different formats, the main requirements for biomedical applications, including biocompatibility, sufficient mechanical properties in terms of elasticity, hardness and stiffness, and low or even no immunogenicity, are met. Biocompatibility is defined as the quality of the biomaterial as not being toxic or having injurious effects on biological systems . In the present paper we have measured the cytocompatibility with murine embryonic fibroblasts as an approach to estimate biocompatibility. Finally, we discuss the suitability of the different recombinant synthetic spider silk proteins for biomedical applications.
Recombinant production of synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins
The principal reason for fusion of the synthetic spidroins to 100 repeats of ELP was to enable the chromatography-free purification by inverse transition cycling (ITC) [26,33], a low cost method for recovery of biopolymers. Here, synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins were purified from tobacco leaves of transgenic plants via an advanced membrane based ITC , which was optimized for spider silks and performed according to Weichert et al. . A heat incubation step at the beginning of the purification procedure leads to denaturation of the majority of the proteins. In the following cooling step (4°C), all fusion proteins became soluble and were separated by centrifugation and enriched by filtration after several temperature shifts. For further investigations purified proteins were analyzed as casted layers or in solution.
Mechanical investigation of synthetic spidroin-based biopolymer layers
Surface roughness of various synthetic biopolymer layers
Mean surface roughness s a (nm)
Squared surface roughness s q (nm)
Elastic penetration moduli of recombinant spidroin-based fusion protein layers
Elastic penetration modulus E (GPa)
2.73 ± 0.02
3.85 ± 0.02
4.51 ± 0.03
0.172 ± 0.001
To study in greater detail the influence of the increasing spidroin content in these ELPylated recombinant proteins, analyses of immunogenicity and cytotoxicity were performed and related to their potential use as biomaterials.
Immunogenicity of synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins 1xVSO1-100xELP and 4xVSO1-100xELP
Overview of analyzed immune responses
mouse normal serum
1xVSO1-100xELP (56 kDa)
4xVSO1-100xELP (96 kDa)
anti-TNF-VHH (15 kDa)
anti-TNF-VHH-100xELP (57 kDa)
100xELP (42 kDa)
In vitro cytotoxicity assays of the synthetic spidroin-based biopolymers 1xVSO1-100xELP and 4xVSO1-100xELP
The high molecular weight of spider silk proteins is assumed to be a key factor that underpins their outstanding mechanical properties, because all characterized native spider silks consist of proteins with high molecular weights . In this study, we analyzed the relation of the spidroin content in recombinant spidroin-based biopolymers and the corresponding mechanical properties. The elastic penetration modulus E was found to range from 2.7 GPa for 1xVSO1-100xELP to 4.5 GPa for 4xVSO1-100xELP; the synthetic biopolymer with the highest molecular weight that was used in this study. The significant increase of the elastic penetration modulus E, which correlates in a first approximation with the Young’s modulus, appears to be due to the increase in the spidroin content. E values were also comparable to ELPylated MaSp1 derivatives, which were previously investigated . One must take into account that the recombinant spidroin-based biopolymers analyzed here has approximately one-third of the molecular weight of the native MaSp1 and that protein layers were examined. In comparison, for native dragline silk a Young’s modulus of approximately 12 GPa was determined . Additionally, the mechanical characterization of a fiber made from native-sized recombinant spider silk protein showed a Young’s modulus of 21 ± 4 GPa; however, in the same study it was also noted that proteins of lower molecular weight did not yield similar material properties . Therefore, for further intended projects the production of native-sized spidroin containing biopolymers is commendable and has already been successfully performed in planta with an intein-based post-translational protein multimerization technology .
Low immunogenicity is anticipated for natural spider silks; this feature was exemplarily proven for major ampullate dragline silk collected from Nephila clavipes . Here, we presented the first results of a specific antibody response to a spidroin-based biopolymer, which was enabled by a collection of various mouse sera that were prepared after immunization of mice with soluble spidroin-ELP fusion proteins. The spidroin-based proteins additionally contain the c-myc tag. An immune response against the c-myc-tag could not be detected by immunoblotting. All the antigens used in the immunological analyses were produced in plants to allow comparisons in all experiments. The data found by indirect ELISA showed a relative specific reaction against the immunogen, either 1xVSO1-100xELP or 4xVSO1-100xELP. This data provides no insight into whether these specific antibodies in the sera bind to ELP- or spidroin-based epitopes or new overall structures in the different fusion proteins. After denaturation of the antigens and SDS-PAGE, the specific reactions were not observed in the immunoblotting experiments. Competitive ELISA data showed clearly that binding is completely inhibited by 100xELP. We conclude that the humoral immune response against the spidroin-based polymers is directed against epitopes involving 100xELP. The sera raised against 1xVSO1-100xELP bind to 100xELP with a > 15-fold higher mean dissociation constant. These differences in the affinity against ELP support the view (see above) that 1xVSO1-100xELP and 4xVSO1-100xELP induced antibodies against different epitopes. These antibodies with higher mean affinity could be induced either by the higher ELP proportion in the fusion protein compared with 4xSO1-100xELP or by specific structures occurring in the 1xVSO1-100xELP fusion protein. We conclude that, in general, spidroin-based biopolymer variants have to be tested according their immunogenicity in each single case. The structure of fusion proteins could lead to the induction of several new immune responses even if standard basic sequences are used.
Cytocompatibility is a prerequisite for the biomedical application of a material. Therefore, in vitro cytotoxicity assays are typically one of the first assessments carried out in the biological evaluation of biopolymers. Recombinant spider silk proteins have been tested in a number of different settings. In previous studies, it was shown that a plant-produced synthetic spidroin derived from MaSp1 and fused with hundred repeats of elastin-like peptides (ELP) resulted in a non-cytotoxic biopolymer that supported the proliferation of mammalian cells . An example of a recombinant spider silk protein consisting of five glycine-rich segments alternating with four polyalanine stretches connected to a non-repetitive globular C-terminal domain by a serine- and alanine-rich linker produced in E. coli was tested with primary human fibroblasts. The cells attached to the material and grew on different matrices such as meshes and foams . 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to porous scaffolds of recombinant protein based on spidroin 1, even filling the deeper layers after 14 days . However, a recombinant protein based on the silk of the European garden spider prevented adhesion and cell proliferation of BALB/3 T3 fibroblasts when coated on silicone surfaces . Here, we found a positive stimulation of cellular metabolism, which indicates higher growth rates. This effect was dependent on the composition of the protein. Interestingly, we could even enhance the positive effect when the proteins were freely available in the medium. Although, we cannot rule out that this effect is based on the nutritive value of the proteins, this is rather unlikely owing to the negligible concentration of the protein present.
Biomaterials in contact with blood must show good hemocompatibility, which is often improved by coating. Sulfated silkworm fibroin has been used for this purpose in a study to enhance the hemocompatibility of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid vascular grafts . Nevertheless, it has been discussed that larvae from two pyralid moths express silk proteins in their guts, their fat body and their hemocytes. It is assumed that these proteins also take part in immunity and coagulation . We observed no hemolytic effect in the examined samples, indicating that they may serve as biocompatible coatings of blood-exposed implants.
Synthetic spidroins as biomaterials that are produced in biotechnology processes have potential use in a wide range of biomedical material applications. Prominent examples are scaffolds for tissue engineering (films, sponges, hydrogels) and drug delivery systems that trigger an effective immune response after vaccination with particle bound antigens [45,46]. In this study, we partially worked with casted proteins. Since the surface of the resulting films showed a very low roughness, applications as a coating or a wound dressing device is conceivable. Finally, the molecular weight of spidroin-based biopolymers did not influence the cytocompatibility of the casted films.
The main goal of the present study was the assessment of the immunological properties and cytotoxic effects of synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins expressed in planta. Considering the rising elastic penetration modulus determined by AFM-based nanoindentation with increasing spidroin content, we assume additionally a first relationship between spidroin size and mechanical properties. All available antibody detection systems were used to determine epitope regions, including detection of the c-myc tag, characterization of mouse sera after immunization with the synthetic spidroin-based biopolymers and performance of competitive ELISA with the competitor ELP. Furthermore, analyses of cross-reactivity experiments gave no hint of an immunogenic region in the synthetic spidroin part of the fusion constructs. In the end, cytocompatibility studies provided no indication of spidroin-derived cytotoxicity. This implies that these plant-derived synthetic biopolymers are suitable for use as biomaterials.
Design of plasmids
Synthetic 1xVSO1 was produced by Geneart (Life Technologies, CA, USA) and contained repetitive gene motives from Nephila clavipes cDNA [GenBank: M37137.2]. In the course of the synthesis, the codon usage of synthetic 1xVSO1 was adapted to N. tabacum. After restriction digest with BamHI and BglII the gene fragment was ligated into the vector 100xELP-pRTRA . Further insertion of synthetic genes was facilitated with an additional restriction digest of the vector (VSO1)n-100xELP-pRTRA with BamHI and ligation of a BamHI/BglII digested 1xVSO1 gene fragment. After ligation, a functional BamHI restriction site was retained at the 5′-prime end of the synthetic gene. The resulting plasmid (VSO1)n-100xELP-pRTRA contained a plant expression cassette consisting of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV) 35S promoter , the legumin B4 signal peptide (LeB4) , the synthetic gene (VSO1)n, a c-myc tag , 100 repeats of the fusion protein ELP  and the ER retention signal KDEL . The expression cassettes were excised with the restriction enzyme HindIII and inserted individually into the binary vector pCB301-Kan , resulting in the plant expression vectors (VSO1)n-100xELP-pCB301-Kan.
Production of plant-expressed synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins
The binary vectors were transformed into the A. tumefaciens strain C58C1 (pGV2260)  by electroporation. For stable transformation of tobacco (N. tabacum cv. SNN), the leaf disc transformation method reported by Horsch et al.  was performed. The transgenic plants were cultured on Murashige-Skoog agar containing 50 mg/L kanamycin and analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti-c-myc antibody . High expressing plants were cropped into soil and grown in a greenhouse for 4 to 6 weeks prior to harvesting the leaves. The fusion of the synthetic spider silks to 100xELP enabled protein purification via membrane-based inverse transition cycling (mITC) . Therefore, frozen leaf material (−80°C) was crushed, added to preheated (85°C) 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) and cooked for 1 hour. Further purification and desalting was performed as described . For determining protein weight and storage, the purified proteins (VSO1)n-100xELP were lyophilized (ALPHA2-4LSD; Christ, Osterode, Germany).
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis
For analysis of transgenic plants, leaf material was ground in liquid nitrogen. Sample buffer (72 mM Tris, 10% v/v glycerol, 2% w/v SDS, 5% w/v 2-mercaptoethanol and 0.0025 mM bromphenol blue, pH 6.8) was added and the homogenate was incubated for 10 min at 95°C. After centrifugation (30 min, 4°C, 12,000 rpm), the extract (supernatant) was kept and the protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Germany). Plant extracts or purified proteins, which were also analyzed by immunoblotting, were separated on reducing SDS-PAGE and electroblotted to a nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman GmbH, GE Healthcare, Germany) using 25 mM Tris, 0.1% w/v SDS, 192 mM glycine and 20% v/v methanol. For detection of the transgenic product, the membranes were blocked for 2 hours in 5% w/v fat-free dry milk dissolved in 180 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris, pH 7.8. The primary antibody was either an anti-c-myc (9E10) supernatant  or an anti-(VSO1)n-100xELP mouse serum. Therefore, two groups of four mice each (C57BL/6 J) were immunized with 1xVSO1-100xELP or 4xVSO1-100xELP. For the first immunization, 50 μg antigen and complete Freund’s adjuvants (Difco, USA) were used. In the following three immunizations animals were boosted with 20 μg antigen and incomplete Freund’s adjuvants (Difco, USA). Titers from blood samples were evaluated by ELISA and sera were collected one week after the fourth immunization. For immunoblotting analysis the secondary antibody used was a horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated anti-mouse IgG from sheep (GE Healthcare UK Ltd., UK). Synthetic spidroin-based fusion proteins were detected by ECL (Amersham ECL Plus TM, GE Healthcare UK Ltd., UK).
Mechanical Testing of (VSO1)n-100xELP
Protein layers for AFM imaging and AFM-based nanoindentation were casted by the drop to drop technique. Therefore, proteins were solubilized in water to a concentration of 1 mg/mL, successively dropped in 20 μL droplets onto glass slides and dried in a vacuum (Vacuum Concentrator 5301; Eppendorf, Germany) at room temperature until achieving layers of required thickness . Measurements of protein layer thicknesses and topographical imaging were performed by an atomic force microscope Nanowizard®II (JPK Instruments, Germany) using either the Contact Mode with an MLCT silicon nitride cantilever (Bruker Cooperation, USA) or silicon cantilevers PPP-NCHR (NANOSENSORS™, NanoWorld AG, Switzerland) with tip radii below 7 nm for the Intermittent Contact Mode. Based on topographical information, roughness data were evaluated. AFM-based nanoindentation was performed to assess the elastic penetration modulus E. For that reason, the same AFM instrument was used to record and evaluate load penetration curves according to an advanced Hertzian model for spherical indenter geometry [27,55] as a course of the load dependent on a penetration depth between 10 to 15 nm. E-values were calculated from a large series of 1225 indentations, which were performed for each protein layer with an orthogonal and lateral inter-sampling point distance of 715 nm and this enabled the statistically evident calculation of E for each material (Additional file 1). Elastic penetration moduli E were calculated from the recorded load penetration curves. Here, a diamond-coated cantilever DT-NCHR #1 (NanoWorld AG, Switzerland) calibrated by the Thermal Noise Method was used. The exact geometry of the diamond-coated cantilever tips was checked by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after indentation measurements.
Indirect and competitive ELISA
For evaluation of the antibody titer against the specific antigen and to examine the cross-reaction, an indirect ELISA was performed. Ninety-six-well plates (MaxiSorp™ Surface, Thermo Scientific Nunc A/S, Denmark) were coated overnight at room temperature with 500 ng of synthetic spidroin dissolved in 100 μL phosphate-buffered saline for phages (PPBS; 32 mM Na2HPO4 × 2 H2O, 17 mM NaH2PO4 × H2O, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.2). Bovine serum albumin (BSA, 3% w/v) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 8 mM Na2HPO4 × 2 H2O, 2 mM KH2PO4, 150 mM NaCl) supplemented with 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 (PBS-T) was used as the negative control. Blocking was done with 130 μL/well using 3% (w/v) BSA in PBS-T (pH 7.6) for 2 hours at room temperature. Mouse sera were diluted with 3% BSA in PBS-T as indicated in the results section and applied in triplicate using a volume of 100 μL/well on the coated plates for 1.5 hours at 25°C. After five washing steps with PBS-T, a goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, USA) was added in a dilution of 1:2,000 in 1% (w/v) BSA-PBS-T. Plates were incubated for 1 hour at 25°C followed by five washing cycles with PBS-T. Bound antibodies were detected after the addition of the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate (1 mg/mL in 0.1 M diethanolamine-HCl, pH 9.8). The reaction was incubated at 37°C and the absorbance was measured at 405 nm within of 1 hour of the reaction being initiated.
For the competitive ELISA, antigens were dissolved in PPBS and 50 ng/well (1xVSO1-100xELP) or 100 ng/well (4xVSO1-100xELP), respectively, were coated to the microtiter plates. Blocking and washing were performed as mentioned above. Various concentrations of the competitor 100xELP (1 nmol to 4 μmol and without ELP) were premixed for 30 min at room temperature with either a 1:7,500 dilution of mouse serum 1 (against 1xVSO1-100xELP) or a 1:4,000 dilution of mouse serum 5 (against 4xVSO1-100xELP). Both competition partners were diluted in 3% (w/v) BSA in PBS-T. This premix was added in quintuplicates to the coated plates followed by incubation at 25°C for 1.5 hours; 3% BSA in PBS-T was used as negative control. Further processing of the assay was performed as described above.
Coating of the cell culture material for cytotoxicity tests
The synthetic spidroin-based biopolymers were diluted to a concentration of 50 μg/mL with phosphate-buffered saline without calcium and magnesium (PBS, Life Technologies). Glass coverslips for direct hemolysis assay, coated on both sides, and black microtiter plates for the determination of cell metabolism were coated with the protein by applying the protein solution at 4°C overnight. The liquid was then removed and cell culture plates were dried at room temperature. The coated materials were kept at 4°C or used immediately. PBS without the biopolymer was used as a control.
Cell metabolism assay
Murine embryonic fibroblasts were obtained from the ATCC (ATCC® SCRC-1045™) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) high-glucose (Biochrom, Berlin Germany) with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom, Berlin Germany), 1% sodium pyruvate (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). The cultures were split thrice weekly and kept in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO2. For the measurements, the cells were diluted to 5 × 104 cells/mL and seeded onto microtiter plates. All test samples were done either on surface-coated wells as indicated above or the protein was added to a final concentration of 50 μg/mL to the culture medium. After the indicated time points, 20 μL of CellTiter-Blue® solution (Promega, USA) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. Fluorescent resorufin was measured by using 560 nm excitation and 590 nm emission filters. All tests were repeated at two independent times and performed at octuplicates. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Preparation of blood
The blood was obtained from the Institut für Transfusionsmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. The blood donors subscribed a declaration, that they agree that small amounts of their blood could be used for research proposals. Human blood was collected in S-Monovette tubes (Sarstedt, Germany) with citrate and used within 4 hours after collection by pooling equal amounts of blood. The Hb value of the pooled blood was measured and the blood was diluted with PBS to a total blood Hb concentration of 10 ± 1 mg/mL.
Direct hemolysis assay
The samples were covered with PBS resulting in a surface-to-PBS ratio of 3 cm2/mL in screw-cap polypropylene tubes. Subsequently, pooled blood was added at a ratio of 1:7 and incubated at 37°C for 3 hours. During this time, the tubes were inverted carefully twice every 30 minutes. A sample of 1.8 ml was removed from the test tubes and centrifuged at 700–800 g for 15 minutes. Drabkin’s solution (Sigma, Germany) was added to the samples at equal volumes and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. Two aliquots of each sample were transferred to a microtiter plate and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. All measurements were done in triplicates and catheters (ARROWg + ard Blue, Arrow international) and high density polyethylene films (RM-C, Hatano Research Institute) were used as hemolytic and non-hemolytic controls, respectively.
We kindly acknowledge the skillful technical support of Isolde Tillack, Christine Helmold and Ulrike Gresch. The authors are also grateful to Christina Reufsteck (BioMedImplant) for her support in the hemocompatibility tests and to Frank Rabenstein (JKI Quedlinburg) for his support on the immunization experiments. Further, we acknowledge all members of the International Society for Plant Molecular Farming for inspiring us and the exciting discussions about the production of spider silks. AFM analysis was financed by grant FKZ 22037511 of the Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e. V., supported by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Germany.
- Annabi N, Mithieux SM, Camci-Unal G, Dokmeci MR, Weiss AS, Khademhosseini A. Elastomeric Recombinant Protein-based Biomaterials. Biochem Eng J. 2013;77:110–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Floss DM, Schallau K, Rose-John S, Conrad U, Scheller J. Elastin-like polypeptides revolutionize recombinant protein expression and their biomedical application. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28(1):37–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Floss DM, Conrad U, Rose-John S, Scheller J. ELP fusion technology for biopharmaceuticals. In: Schmidt SR, editor. Fusion protein technologies for biopharmaceuticals: Applications and challenges. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell; 2013. p. 211–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gerritsen VB. The tiptoe of an airbus. In: Protein Spotlight. Swiss Prot. 2002. http://web.expasy.org/spotlight/back_issues/024. Accessed 8 Aug 2013.Google Scholar
- Radtke C, Allmeling C, Waldmann KH, Reimers K, Thies K, Schenk HC, et al. Spider silk constructs enhance axonal regeneration and remyelination in long nerve defects in sheep. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16990.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wendt H, Hillmer A, Reimers K, Kuhbier JW, Schafer-Nolte F, Allmeling C, et al. Artificial skin–culturing of different skin cell lines for generating an artificial skin substitute on cross-weaved spider silk fibres. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21833.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hinman MB, Jones JA, Lewis RV. Synthetic spider silk: a modular fiber. Trends Biotechnol. 2000;18(9):374–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sponner A, Schlott B, Vollrath F, Unger E, Grosse F, Weisshart K. Characterization of the protein components of Nephila clavipes dragline silk. Biochemistry. 2005;44(12):4727–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu M, Lewis RV. Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(18):7120–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewis RV. Spider silk: ancient ideas for new biomaterials. Chem Rev. 2006;106(9):3762–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simmons AH, Michal CA, Jelinski LW. Molecular orientation and two-component nature of the crystalline fraction of spider dragline silk. Science. 1996;271(5245):84–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayashi CY, Shipley NH, Lewis RV. Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. Int J Biol Macromol. 1999;24(2–3):271–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ayoub NA, Garb JE, Tinghitella RM, Collin MA, Hayashi CY. Blueprint for a high-performance biomaterial: full-length spider dragline silk genes. PLoS One. 2007;2(6):e514.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arcidiacono S, Mello C, Kaplan D, Cheley S, Bayley H. Purification and characterization of recombinant spider silk expressed in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;49(1):31–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huemmerich D, Helsen CW, Quedzuweit S, Oschmann J, Rudolph R, Scheibel T. Primary structure elements of spider dragline silks and their contribution to protein solubility. Biochemistry. 2004;43(42):13604–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dams-Kozlowska H, Majer A, Tomasiewicz P, Lozinska J, Kaplan DL, Mackiewicz A. Purification and cytotoxicity of tag-free bioengineered spider silk proteins. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2012;101(2):456–64.Google Scholar
- Winkler S, Szela S, Avtges P, Valluzzi R, Kirschner DA, Kaplan D. Designing recombinant spider silk proteins to control assembly. Int J Biol Macromol. 1999;24(2–3):265–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fahnestock SR, Irwin SL. Synthetic spider dragline silk proteins and their production in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;47(1):23–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chung H, Kim TY, Lee SY. Recent advances in production of recombinant spider silk proteins. Curr Opin Biotech. 2012;23(6):957–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia XX, Qian ZG, Ki CS, Park YH, Kaplan DL, Lee SY. Native-sized recombinant spider silk protein produced in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli results in a strong fiber. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14059–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bogush VG, Sokolova OS, Davydova LI, Klinov DV, Sidoruk KV, Esipova NG, et al. A novel model system for design of biomaterials based on recombinant analogs of spider silk proteins. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009;4(1):17–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheller J, Guhrs KH, Grosse F, Conrad U. Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(6):573–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Menassa R, Zhu H, Karatzas CN, Lazaris A, Richman A, Brandle J. Spider dragline silk proteins in transgenic tobacco leaves: accumulation and field production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2004;2(5):431–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wen H, Lan X, Zhang Y, Zhao T, Wang Y, Kajiura Z, et al. Transgenic silkworms (Bombyx mori) produce recombinant spider dragline silk in cocoons. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37(4):1815–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teule F, Miao YG, Sohn BH, Kim YS, Hull JJ, Fraser Jr MJ, et al. Silkworms transformed with chimeric silkworm/spider silk genes spin composite silk fibers with improved mechanical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(3):923–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheller J, Henggeler D, Viviani A, Conrad U. Purification of spider silk-elastin from transgenic plants and application for human chondrocyte proliferation. Transgenic Res. 2004;13(1):51–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weichert N, Hauptmann V, Menzel M, Schallau K, Gunkel P, Hertel TC, et al. Transglutamination allows production and characterization of native-sized ELPylated spider silk proteins from transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(2):265–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mackay JA, Chilkoti A. Temperature sensitive peptides: engineering hyperthermia-directed therapeutics. Int J Hyperthermia. 2008;24(6):483–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baumlein H, Wobus U, Pustell J, Kafatos FC. The legumin gene family - structure of a B type gene of Vicia faba and a possible legumin gene specific regulatory element. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14(6):2707–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fiedler U, Phillips J, Artsaenko O, Conrad U. Optimization of scFv antibody production in transgenic plants. Immunotechnology. 1997;3(3):205–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ge X, Trabbic-Carlson K, Chilkoti A, Filipe CD. Purification of an elastin-like fusion protein by microfiltration. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;95(3):424–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Floss DM, Mockey M, Zanello G, Brosson D, Diogon M, Frutos R, et al. Expression and immunogenicity of the mycobacterial Ag85B/ESAT-6 antigens produced in transgenic plants by elastin-like peptide fusion strategy. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:274346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyer DE, Chilkoti A. Purification of recombinant proteins by fusion with thermally-responsive polypeptides. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(11):1112–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phan HT, Conrad U. Membrane-based inverse transition cycling: an improved means for purifying plant-derived recombinant protein-elastin-like polypeptide fusions. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(5):2808–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noack S, Schulze G. Statistical evaluation of analytical measurements - approximation of the integral limits of the R-distribution, T-distribution, and F-distribution. Fresen Z Anal Chem. 1980;304:250–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allmeling C, Jokuszies A, Reimers K, Kall S, Choi CY, Brandes G, et al. Spider silk fibres in artificial nerve constructs promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Cell Prolif. 2008;41(3):408–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conrad U, Plagmann I, Malchow S, Sack M, Floss DM, Kruglov AA, et al. ELPylated anti-human TNF therapeutic single-domain antibodies for prevention of lethal septic shock. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(1):22–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hauptmann V, Weichert N, Menzel M, Knoch D, Paege N, Scheller J, et al. Native-sized spider silk proteins synthesized in planta via intein-based multimerization. Transgenic Res. 2013;22(2):369–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vollrath F, Barth P, Basedow A, Engstrom W, List H. Local tolerance to spider silks and protein polymers in vivo. In Vivo. 2002;16(4):229–34.Google Scholar
- Widhe M, Bysell H, Nystedt S, Schenning I, Malmsten M, Johansson J, et al. Recombinant spider silk as matrices for cell culture. Biomaterials. 2010;31(36):9575–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agapov II, Pustovalova OL, Moisenovich MM, Bogush VG, Sokolova OS, Sevastyanov VI, et al. Three-dimensional scaffold made from recombinant spider Silk protein for tissue engineering. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2009;426:127–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeplin PH, Maksimovikj NC, Jordan MC, Nickel J, Lang G, Leimer AH, et al. Spider Silk Coatings as a Bioshield to reduce Periprosthetic Fibrous Capsule Formation. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24:2658–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu H, Li X, Niu X, Zhou G, Li P, Fan Y. Improved hemocompatibility and endothelialization of vascular grafts by covalent immobilization of sulfated silk fibroin on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(8):2914–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korayem AM, Hauling T, Lesch C, Fabbri M, Lindgren M, Loseva O, et al. Evidence for an immune function of lepidopteran silk proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;352(2):317–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofer M, Winter G, Myschik J. Recombinant spider silk particles for controlled delivery of protein drugs. Biomaterials. 2012;33(5):1554–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiess K, Lammel A, Scheibel T. Recombinant spider silk proteins for applications in biomaterials. Macromol Biosci. 2010;10(9):998–1007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Floss DM, Sack M, Stadlmann J, Rademacher T, Scheller J, Stoger E, et al. Biochemical and functional characterization of anti-HIV antibody-ELP fusion proteins from transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6(4):379–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franck A, Guilley H, Jonard G, Richards K, Hirth L. Nucleotide sequence of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Cell. 1980;21(1):285–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Munro S, Pelham HR. A C-terminal signal prevents secretion of luminal ER proteins. Cell. 1987;48(5):899–907.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wandelt CI, Khan MR, Craig S, Schroeder HE, Spencer D, Higgins TJ. Vicilin with carboxy-terminal KDEL is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum and accumulates to high levels in the leaves of transgenic plants. Plant J. 1992;2(2):181–92.Google Scholar
- Gahrtz M, Conrad U. Immunomodulation of plant function by in vitro selected single-chain Fv intrabodies. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;483:289–312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deblaere R, Bytebier B, De Greve H, Deboeck F, Schell J, Van Montagu M, et al. Efficient octopine Ti plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13(13):4777–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985;227(4691):1229–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evan GI, Lewis GK, Ramsay G, Bishop JM. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product. Macromol Biosci. 1985;5(12):3610–6.Google Scholar
- Lin DC, Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F. Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis–I. Non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(3):430–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.