- Research article
- Open Access
Conditional gene expression in the mouse using a Sleeping Beautygene-trap transposon
© Geurts et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
- Received: 08 March 2006
- Accepted: 26 June 2006
- Published: 26 June 2006
Insertional mutagenesis techniques with transposable elements have been popular among geneticists studying model organisms from E. coli to Drosophila and, more recently, the mouse. One such element is the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon that has been shown in several studies to be an effective insertional mutagen in the mouse germline. SB transposon vector studies have employed different functional elements and reporter molecules to disrupt and report the expression of endogenous mouse genes. We sought to generate a transposon system that would be capable of reporting the expression pattern of a mouse gene while allowing for conditional expression of a gene of interest in a tissue- or temporal-specific pattern.
Here we report the systematic development and testing of a transposon-based gene-trap system incorporating the doxycycline-repressible Tet-Off (tTA) system that is capable of activating the expression of genes under control of a Tet response element (TRE) promoter. We demonstrate that the gene trap system is fully functional in vitro by introducing the "gene-trap tTA" vector into human cells by transposition and identifying clones that activate expression of a TRE-luciferase transgene in a doxycycline-dependent manner. In transgenic mice, we mobilize gene-trap tTA vectors, discover parameters that can affect germline mobilization rates, and identify candidate gene insertions to demonstrate the in vivo functionality of the vector system. We further demonstrate that the gene-trap can act as a reporter of endogenous gene expression and it can be coupled with bioluminescent imaging to identify genes with tissue-specific expression patterns.
Akin to the GAL4/UAS system used in the fly, we have made progress developing a tool for mutating and revealing the expression of mouse genes by generating the tTA transactivator in the presence of a secondary TRE-regulated reporter molecule. A vector like the gene-trap tTA could provide a means for both annotating mouse genes and creating a resource of mice that express a regulable transcription factor in temporally- and tissue-specific patterns for conditional gene expression studies. These mice would be a valuable resource to the mouse genetics community for purpose of dissecting mammalian gene function.
- Internal Ribosomal Entry Site
- Mouse Gene
- Gene Trap
- Sleep Beauty
- Internal Ribosomal Entry Site Element
Derived from ancient salmonid fish sequences , the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon is a member of the Tc1/mariner superfamily of cut-and-paste transposable elements  and has been developed as a vertebrate transformation tool  and germline insertional mutagen [4, 5]. We and others have shown that the SB transposon is highly active in the mouse germline and can generate heritable loss-of-function mutations that lead to detectable phenotypes [4–7].
Data accumulated from spontaneous and engineered mouse mutations suggests that a significant percentage of mouse genes are essential for early development. This has necessitated the creation of various genetic tools for conditional loss- or gain-of-function genetic studies. In Drosophila, the ability to regulate genes in a tissue- or temporally-specific manner has become one method to study the function of these genes. Likewise, the ability to control the expression of an essential mouse gene is one way to discover its function in tissues that are formed after lethal phenotypes are manifest. Temporal and spatial control of gene expression in mutant backgrounds can be used to determine when a gene product is required during a developmental process [8–10]. With this in mind, and taking lessons from the Drosophila literature on GAL4/UAS-based P-element transposon systems , we designed a SB transposon-based gene trap system that allows us to annotate the expression pattern and function of mouse genes.
Previous studies using the SB transposon system for generating insertional mutations in the germline of mice used various gene- and polyA-trap transposon vectors [4, 5]. These vectors were designed to truncate an endogenous mRNA, incorporate coding sequences for a visible reporter like β-Galactosidase or green fluorescent protein (GFP), and report the expression patterns of trapped genes. If a transcriptional transactivator, similar to GAL4, were used in place of a visible reporter molecule, a small amount of the molecule could lead to high levels of a secondary reporter transgene under control of a responsive promoter. Analogous to the GAL4/UAS system, the tetracycline-controlled transactivator (tTA) and Tet-response element promoter (TRE) were developed for mammalian systems .
Here we report the creation of a mutagenic SB-based, gene-trap transposon vector that can insert into a mouse gene and express the Tet-off transcriptional transactivator (tTA) in its tissue- and temporally-regulated manner. The "gene-trap tTA" can mutate genes and record their expression patterns for functional annotation as well as create a mechanism for driving the expression of transgenes in a regulable manner in vivo. We also report several general parameters that impact the application of the Sleeping Beauty transposon system to mouse functional genomics including analysis of transposon mobilization rates in several different transgenic lines and the rescue of a mutant phenotype by remobilization.
Creation of the gene-trap tTA system
Fig. 1B shows the method by which the gene-trap tTA can disrupt a mouse gene. When the gene-trap transposon lands in the intron of a gene, it will intercept splicing from an upstream exon and incorporate the IRES and tTA elements to form a bicistronic messenger RNA. Translation of the endogenous gene peptide is truncated at one of the stop codons incorporated just upstream of the IRES. The IRES element allows cap-independent translation initiation from the second open reading frame to produce tTA from the same mRNA. For the T2/GT2/tTA vector, an insertion into a gene in the opposite orientation is not predicted to mutate the gene, however, the T2/GT3/tTA would interrupt splicing with the HPRT splice acceptor, but will not express tTA.
Before making transgenic mice, we validated the functionality of the gene-trap tTA as a faithful activator of reporter gene expression in vitro. First, a G418-resistance cassette was cloned into the T2/GT2/tTA transposon vector to generate T2/GT2/tTA/SVNeo (Fig. 1C). We then generated a HeLa cell line harboring a TRE-regulated luciferase transgene. Upon co-transfection of the pT2/GT2/tTA/SVNeo transposon vector plasmid and a source of SB transposase, pCMV-SB , the gene-trap tTA transposes at random into the HeLa cell genome. The SVNeo cassette confers G418 resistance to cells that integrate and express the transposon vector, but the gene-trap tTA cassette can intercept splicing and express tTA only if the transposon lands in an expressed gene in the correct orientation. Fig. 1D shows the luciferase activation in sixty-two individual G418-resistant clone extracts. As a control, a transposon that contained the same G418 resistance cassette, but not the splice acceptor-IRES-tTA cassette, did not activate luciferase expression (Fig. 1D, white bars). As expected, only a subset of T2/GT2/tTA/SVNeo-transgenic clones, 17 out of 50, showed activation of TRE-luciferase above background levels.
The activity of tTA is regulable by administering the drug tetracycline or its analog doxycycline . We tested this sensitivity by administering doxycycline to three of the TRE-luciferase activated clones from Fig. 1D. Fig. 1E shows the doxycycline-dependent repression of TRE-luciferase activation in each clone. Luciferase activity was reduced approximately two orders of magnitude in clones, 43 and 44, and about one order of magnitude in clone 39. Finally, to assure that gene trap tTA activation was dependent on splicing from an upstream exon of an expressed gene, 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was performed with primers specific to the gene trap on mRNA extracts prepared from several clones. Additional file 1 shows the sequence tags, chromosomes and gene identification obtained for seven clones. In each case, an upstream exon of the gene is spliced into the gene-trap tTA at the predicted position (underlined). These data demonstrate that the tTA molecule can be expressed from the gene-trap tTA vector in the context of a trapped gene to activate a TRE-regulated transgene and that this activation is repressible by the addition of doxycycline. With the prospect of generating mouse strains with regulated gene-trap tTA activation, we set out to test the system in vivo.
Parameters affecting germline mobilization rates
Mobilization of gene-trap tTA transposons in the germlines of seed mice.
Copy No. a
Seed Mice (T2+/-;SB10+/-)
New Hits b
Rate/Copy No. c
F (pT2 +/+)
Table 1 also demonstrates that germline mobilization rates are lower in the female germline when compared to their male siblings (dashed boxes). Finally, the solid box shows the difference in transposition rates between two sibling male seed mice, one hemizygous and one homozygous for the transposase transgene. While the SB10+/+ seed male did not show increased transposition over other independently generated seed mice for the 4563 line, there was an increase over its sibling SB10+/- seed male, suggesting that we may be able to increase transposition rates by increasing the transposase dosage in future studies. The analysis of several transposon-transgenic lines has thus revealed parameters that affect transposition rates, and suggest careful line selection will be required for mutagenic programs.
Sleeping Beauty-mediated gene insertion in vivo
Molecular characterization of gene-trap tTA function
Insertion number 02A-0001 is in the first intron of the carbonic anhydrase-12 gene (Car12), while 02A-0002 is inserted into intron 8 of the predicted novel gene ENSMUSG00000066992 (Fig. 3A). The top panel in Fig. 3B shows the expression pattern of mouse Car12 by reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) on RNA extracts from several wild type tissues using primers in exons 1 and 5. If the gene trap is splicing properly, the IRES and tTA sequences should be fused to exon 1 of the Car12 mRNA. The second panel shows RT-PCR detection of endogenous Car12 and Car12-IRES-tTA bicistronic transcripts in RNA samples taken from a heterozygous carrier of insertion 02A-0001. Nested PCR was necessary to detect the fusion transcript in some tissues. Comparing the wild type expression pattern of Car12 mRNA and the fusion transcript, it is apparent that expression of the trapped mRNA is tissue specific as predicted. The fusion transcript can be detected in the heart of the carrier, but not wildtype heart RNA extracts. We attribute this to the extra sensitivity of the nested PCR and suspect that endogenous Car12 is expressed in the heart at a low level.
If the carp β-actin splice acceptor is efficient, it should truncate the endogenous gene mRNA after the nearest upstream exon. Total RNA extracts from wild type, and heterozygous or homozygous carriers of both insertions 02A-0001 and 02A-0002 were probed for expression of endogenous Car12 or ENSMUSG00000066992 transcripts respectively. Fig. 3C shows complete ablation of Car12 mRNA in the kidney and brain of a homozygous carrier of insertion 02A-0001. Expression of ENSMUSG00000066992, detectable by RT-PCR exclusively in mouse brain (data not shown), was not ablated in homozygous carriers of insertion 02-0002, however, suggesting that the carp β-actin splice acceptor does not work efficiently in each case.
Interestingly, Car12 mutant mice demonstrate reduced fitness, as an intercross of 02A-0001 carriers results in non-mendelian inheritance of the homozygous class (data not shown). The expression of the carbonic anhydrase (CA-XII) has been previously localized to the membranes of mouse kidney, colon, and testes . The CA-XII peptide has been previously reported to be 46 kDA . Fig. 3C shows the reduction of CA-XII expression in the heterozygous kidney and absence in the homozygous kidney. Antibody cross-reaction with a ~ 30-kDa peptide is consistent with cross-reactions previously seen in kidney extracts with this antibody , and serves as a loading control (arrowhead, Fig. 3C).
Tissue-specific activation of a TRE promoter-regulated transgene in vivo
In contrast, a striking pattern of luciferase expression was captured by imaging 03A-0241; Tg(tetL)1Bjd/J doubly transgenic mice (mouse 936) when compared to singly 03A-0241 transgenic (mouse 933) or Tg(tetL)1Bjd/J controls (Fig. 5A). Light emission patterns were detected from anatomical origins corresponding to the sternum, spleen, femurs and vertebrae, presumably reflecting luciferase activation in a component of the bone marrow and hematopoietic cells. The MacF1 gene has more than 100 exons and has been reported to be expressed in multiple isoforms in the mouse with high levels produced in the lung . Using primers in exons that flank the 03A-0241 insertion to amplify MacF1 transcripts, Fig. 5B demonstrates that at least two splice variants of different sizes are variably expressed in several tissues, but MacF1 is not normally expressed in the bone marrow of a wild-type mouse. This suggests that the 03A-0241 insertion into MacF1 may cause abnormal expression of the gene in the bone marrow and hematopoietic cells. However, multiple attempts to amplify the chimeric MacF1-IRES-tTA transcript from bone marrow extracts from carrier mice by RT-PCR were unsuccessful in identifying this spliced transcript.
To determine whether this pattern was linked only to insertion 03A-0241 and the mouse MacF1 gene, Southern blots and genotyping PCR were performed on mouse 936 (and siblings 931–935) and his offspring (mice 949–976) (Fig. 5C). Surprisingly, mice that inherited insertion 03A-0241 by PCR showed linkage to the concatemer donor site by Southern blot (Fig. 5A, arrowhead). This was unexpected because these mice were generated from T2/GT3/tTA line 6660 (Table 1), which has a transposon donor site on mouse chromosome 11. MacF1 is located on mouse chromosome 4 at 57.4 cM, thus the Southern data suggests that a large portion of the chromosome-11 concatemer had translocated by some mechanism to chromosome-4. Thus, the MacF1 insertion on chromosome 4 is still genetically linked to a translocated donor concatemer of multiple T2/GT3/tTA transposons in addition to other linked single-copy insertions (Fig. 5C, arrows). Repeated attempts to identify these other linked chromosome-4 insertions by our cloning techniques and 5'RACE for trapped sequences in bone marrow extracts were unsuccessful in identifying the origin of this tissue-specific gene-trap tTA expression. Nevertheless, the pattern seen in 03A-0241; Tg(tetL)1Bjd/J mice is unique to these mice, as it is not seen in carriers of other T2/GT2/tTA or T2/GT3/tTA insertions (with or without associated concatemers) when crossed to the Tg(tetL)1Bjd/J strain (above and data not shown).
The tissue-specific luciferase pattern in carriers of this insertion could be reproducibly transmitted through the germline to offspring (mice 962–964 and 971–973, Fig. 5D). The upper range of luciferase activation from each offsrpring, measured in photons/second/cm2, ranged approximately a thousand-fold (scale bars). We attribute these differences to differences in the levels of cap-independent translation of the tTA molecule from the IRES in each mouse. Finally, other groups have demonstrated in vivo sensitivity of tTA-dependent activation of gene expression to tetracycline, or its analog doxycycline [24, 28, 29]. We determined whether we could control gene-trap tTA activation of luciferase by administering doxycycline to the drinking water of the 03A-0241; Tg(tetL)1Bjd/J mice. Fig. 5E demonstrates absence of luciferase signal in the same animals from Fig. 5D, after six days of treatment, suggesting complete repression of the tTA-dependent luciferase activation.
We examined the utility of a SB transposon-base gene trap vector that expresses the Tet-off transcriptional transactivator in the patterns of trapped genes in vitro and in vivo. The gene-trap tTA demonstrated full utility in cultured cells, having the ability to insert in genes, trap the splicing of those genes to express the tTA transcription factor which, in turn, could activate a TRE-regulated transgene in a doxycycline-dependent manner. Likewise, analysis of gene-trap tTA transposon insertions into mouse genes revealed that the vector system can completely disrupt the expression of a mouse gene in some cases and can tissue-specifically activate expression of a TRE promoter-regulated transgene in a doxycycline-dependent manner in vivo. While ultimately this vector system can function as designed, several observations suggest we need a more optimal approach for creating a resource of mice that express tTA in developmentally-controlled patterns.
Germline SB transposon mobilization rates in the mouse germline are variable and ranged from less than one in twenty to nearly three events per gamete. An evaluation of several different transposon-transgenic lines has given us insight into the potential the SB system to perform regional mutagenesis throughout the genome. The genomic location of the transposon donor site, along with copy number, impacts the germline mobilization rate from any concatemer (see Table 1). This suggests that not all parts of the genome are equally accessible to SB transposition. Understanding the mechanisms behind this "mobilization position effect" will likely require an increased understanding about molecular regulators of SB transposition, but may include a well known director of position effect, heterochromatinization .
As demonstrated in previous studies and here, SB transposon-based gene trap vectors can function in vivo to disrupt the expression of mouse genes. The T2/GT2/tTA vector can completely ablate the expression of a mouse gene as demonstrated by the null mutation that was generated in the mouse Car12 gene. Not all gene insertions completely disrupt gene expression however, as in the case of insertion 02A-0002 into ENSMUSG00000066992. While hypomorphic mutations may be valuable to discover the function of an essential mouse gene, this has lead to ideas on how to improve the efficacy of future vectors. Splice acceptors derived from different genes, termination sequences (polyadenylation signals) and other functional sequences have been used in several ES cell plasmid- and retroviral-based gene-trapping studies with varying efficiencies [31–33]. Drawing data from other groups will lead to improved vectors for trapping mouse genes and perhaps lead to vectors to trap certain classes of genes .
The activation of luciferase by the tetracycline-controlled transactivator varied rougly 1000-fold (Fig. 5D) when expressed from the IRES in the gene-trap tTA. Once again, improvements to the functional components of the gene trap vector may lead to more reliable and greater expression of the transactivator. Alternative IRES elements like the 9-nucleotide IRES element from the murine Gtx homeodomain gene , or eliminating the IRES entirely, may allow for more consistent tTA expression.
The brilliant pattern of in vivo luciferase expression seen if Fig. 5 was initially thought to originate from insertion in the MacF1 gene. Published reports suggested that neither the bone marrow, nor hematopoietic cells are in the normal expression domain of this gene. Upon further molecular characterization, we discovered that this gene was not spliced into the gene-trap tTA, and by Southern blot, found it was tightly linked to other insertions as well as the concatemer. It seems more likely that the pattern of tTA-dependent luciferase activation seen in carriers of the 03A-0241 insertion comes from one of these linked transposons. Efforts to find the source of this expression by 5'RACE were unfortunately unsuccessful. We propose that in the case of insertion 03A-0241, the concatemer translocated to chromosome 4 first, then a single copy of T2/GT3/tTA hopped locally into MacF1. We have observed similar and other types of genomic rearrangements associated with transposition from the chromosome-11 donor site in other mice (A.M.G., manuscript in preparation). These observations would suggest that gene-trap tTA mobilization in the germline may not be the most efficient means of generating a resource of mice with tissue-specific tTA expression patterns. It is not clear, however, that these large donor site insertions are not rare events that could be tolerated. Independent insertions, unlinked to the concatemer or other transposons, are frequently recovered. By pre-selecting mice that do not inherit the concatemer by Southern blot or PCR analysis, a screen would largely avoid the complications of linked transposons.
An alternative and relatively facile approach would be to inject a linearized plasmid harboring the gene-trap tTA transposon, along with in vitro-transcribed transposase messenger RNA, into one-cell mouse embryos. In the one-cell embryo, the transposase mRNA is translated and transposase catalyzes integration into the mouse genome at rates that are two to three-fold higher than standard pronuclear injection of naked DNA . This method produces transgenic mice with insertions distributed randomly across the genome, and multiple linkage groups are frequently obtained from a single injection . This would be another method to avoid the complications of linked insertions and concatemers.
Finally, using the GAL4/UAS enhancer trap systems used in the fly, expression-based screening has been useful for identifying genes with similar or overlapping expression patterns  and for tissue-specific overexpression studies . As we have shown here, a transgenic mouse expressing firefly luciferase under the control of the tet-response enhancer/promoter (TRE) can be coupled with the gene-trap tTA system to identify in vivo patterns with an intensified CCD camera system. In a screen, this type of imaging could be used to identify gene trap insertions that lead to tTA expression in a particular tissue or developmental stage, even in utero [38, 39]. Alternatively, mouse strains for other TRE-regulated transgenes have been created, allowing for tTA-dependent expression of β-galactosidase  or GFP . If the efficiency of the gene-trap tTA transposon can be improved, these strains could be used by any lab to identify tissue-specific patterns.
As a tool for the mouse community, introducing a gene-trap tTA vector into mouse genes with different spatial and temporal expression patterns would create a valuable tool for the mouse genetic toolbox. Tissue-specific promoters can control the expression of transactivators like tTA and rtTA (reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator) in transgenic animals [42–44]. Having tissue-specific and temporal control of gene expression in any mouse tissue at any developmental stage could allow for the dissection of biological gene functions that were previously masked by a phenotype such as lethality. An SB-based transposon vector is well suited to accomplish this task by introducing precisely integrated functional reporter units into the mouse genome. In addition, an improved gene-trap tTA could provide more reliable expression of the transactivator than a transgene construct since transcription is regulated in the context of an endogenous gene and is thus less likely to be subject to the position effect variegation that can hinder the expression of transgenes.
Cloning gene-trap tTA transposon vectors
All primer/oligo sequences for PCR and cloning are provided in Additional file 4. All gene-trap tTA vectors are descendent of pGT/tTA, originally described in Clark et al . 2004 . An artificial exon (based on carp β-actin exon 2), with stop codons in each reading frame, was created by annealing four oligos (AMG049-AMG052), filling in the gaps with Klenow DNA polymerase, ligation with T4 DNA ligase, PCR amplifying with AMG049 and AMG051, and subcloning the AgeI fragment into the partially-digested SmaI-AgeI fragment of pGT/tTA to create pGT2/tTA. Subcloning the exonuclease-treated EcoRV-PstI fragment of pGT2/tTA into the Klenow-treated blunt HindIII fragment of pT2/HindIII  generated pT2/GT2/tTA. pT2/GT2/SVNeo was created by subcloning the Klenow-treated HindIII fragment of pT2/SVneo  into the EcoRV fragment of pT2/GT2/tTA.
The construction of pT2/GT3/tTA was a multi-step process to add additional features to the GT2 version. First, an NheI site was added to pT2/GT2/tTA by PCR amplifying the entire plasmid with primers AG023 and AG024, containing a 12-bp overlap containing the NheI site sequence, and transformation. E. coli repairs the plasmid by homologous recombination in the overlapped region, resulting in the plasmid pT2/GT2/tTA/NheI. A loxP site was made by annealing two oligos (AG025 and AG026) containing the 34-bp loxP sequence with overhanging 4-base cohesive ends to NheI and cloned into the NheI site of pT2/GT2/tTA/NheI, destroying the NheI site on one side, and adding the loxP sequence to make pT2/GT2/tTA/loxP. The NheI-SpeI fragment of pT2/GT2/tTA/loxP was subcloned into the XbaI fragment of the transposon vector pT2/HB, which has a multiple cloning site, to create pT2/GT2/tTA/loxP-2. 70-mer oligos (SA/V5-1 and SA/V5-2) containing the HPRT splice acceptor and V5 epitope tag with EagI compatible ends were annealed and cloned into the EagI site of pT2/GT2/tTA/loxP-2 to make pT2/GT2/tTA/loxp/SA-V5. In the process, one side of the EagI site was destroyed, leaving a single EagI site. A 32-bp transcriptional termination sequence from the human GASTRIN gene was created by overlapping oligos (Termin-1 and Termin-2) and cloned into this EagI site of pT2/GT2/tTA/loxp/SA-V5 to make pT2/GT2/tTA/loxp/SA-V5/Termin. This sequence was shown to enhance transcriptional termination in plasmid vectors when downstream of polyadenylation signals , and was included to increase the chances of mRNA truncation, and thus mutation, in the gene trap. Finally, a second loxP site was made by annealing the same oligos above and ligation into the SpeI site of pT2/GT2/tTA/loxp/SA-V5/Termin to make the final product, pT2/GT3/tTA.
Generation of Tre-Luciferase/Puro cell line and in vitro gene trap testing
pTRE-Luc was kindly provided by Dr. Perry Hackett's lab and was co-transfected with the plasmid pKO Select-Puro (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) into HeLa cells using Mirus TransIT-LT1 reagent (Promega, Madison, WI). After puromycin resistant clones were isolated, ten clones were tested for inducibility by pTet-off (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). One clone TLP-10 showed a four-log increase in luciferase expression over background in the presence of transfected pTet-off (data not shown), and was subsequently used for the in vitro studies presented here.
pT2/GT2/tTA/SVNeo was transfected into the TLP-10 cell line along with pCMV-SB , and clones were selected in 800 μg/mL G418. pT2/SVNeo  was used as a control. Fifty of these clones and twelve control clones were grown to confluency on 60 mm plates and cells harvested with Promega's Cell Culture Lysis Reagent for luciferase assays. Luciferase assays were performed on 20 μL of lysis extract using 100 μL of Promega's Luciferase Assay Substrate and a Lumat LB 9507 luminometer (Berthold, Bundoora, Australia) with a 15 second measuring time. Relative light unit (RLU) measurements were normalized to total protein concentration as determined by Bradford assay. Doxycycline (Sigma cat. #D-9891) was added to a final concentration of 2 mM to repress tTA-induction of TRE-Luciferase in clones 39, 43, and 44.
RT-PCR and 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)
All primer/oligo sequences for PCR are provided in Additional file 4. Total RNA from cultured cells or mouse tissues was extracted with Trizol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RT-PCR was performed using the one-step RobusT™ I RT-PCR Kit (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A template-switching reaction with Superscript III (Invitrogen) was used to make template for 5'RACE on cultured cell or mouse tissue RNA extract. 250 ng total RNA was mixed with 1 μM each of primers GT2-RT3 and RACE-1, along with 0.01 M dithiothreitol, 500 μM dNTPs, and 1 unit of Superscript III. The mixture was cycled six times at 52°C for 10', 50°C for 15', and then gradually cooled from 50°C to 37°C over two minutes before a final extension for 90" at 37°C. Template was diluted ten-fold in water and 2 μL was used for primary 5'RACE PCR. Briefly, the template was amplified in a 50 μL PCR reaction supplemented with primers GT2-RT3 (0.4 μM), KJC-002 (0.04 μM) and KJC-003 (0.1 μM), 200 μM dNTPS, 2 mM MgCl2, and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (CLP, San Diego, CA). The PCR machine was programmed for touchdown PCR at 95°C for 3', 10 cycles of 95°C for 30", 65°C for 30" (-0.5°C per cycle), 70°C for 2', and then 25 cycles of 95°C for 30", 60°C for 30", and 70°C for 2'. The primary RACE reaction was diluted 1:50 and 2 μL used in a nested PCR under the same exact conditions, except supplemented with 0.5 μM of each primer GT2-RT2 and KJC-004.
Generation of T2/GT2/tTA and T2/GT3/tTA mice by pronuclear injection, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and Southern blotting
The 3379-bp FspI -SapI fragment of pT2/GT2/tTA or the 3738-bp FspI -SapI fragment of pT2/GT3/tTA were gel-purified, ethanol precipitated twice, and resuspended in 5 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA for pronuclear injection into the FVB/N strain of mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). The pT2/GT3/tTA fragment was co-injected with the similarly-prepared HinP1I fragment of the plasmid pTYBS [Overbeek, 1991 #211], a tyrosinase minigene construct kindly provided by Dr. Paul Overbeek, in an attempt to coat-color mark animals that inherit the transposon/tyrosinase minigene transgenic insertion site. Expression of the tyrosinase, for unknown reasons, was not evident in any of the founders (data not shown). FISH on T2/GT3/tTA transgenic mouse lines was performed on splenic lymphocytes using standard techniques, and performing nick translation to label the pT2/GT3/tTA plasmid or whole BAC DNA from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute  were used as a probe. Standard Southern blotting techniques were used to analyze BamHI-digested genomic DNA from founders and subsequent generations using the 842-bp NcoI -SphI fragment of the tTA open reading frame as a probe. BamHI restricts each copy in any T2/GT2/tTA or T2/GT3/tTA concatemer to a single band at 2124-bp or 2236-bp respectively (see Fig. 1A). Transposons mobilized from the concatemer to a genomic site are detected as bands of variable size which are larger than the concatemer band, their size determined by the nearest genomic BamHI site (see Fig. 5C).
Western blotting for CA-XII expression
Whole kidney extracts were probed with a polyclonal CA-XII antibody kindly provided by the laboratory of Dr. William Sly. 50 μg total protein was run on a 10% SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF and probed with a 1:1000 dilution of anti-CAXII primary antibody followed by a 1:10000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Anti-rabbit IgG secondary (Amersham Biosciences) in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % Tween 20) supplemented with 1% dry milk.
In vivoluciferase imaging and analysis of luciferase expression, doxycycline treatment
Transgenic mice were imaged as described in Wilber, et al . (2005) , using luciferin from Xenogen Corporation (Alameda, CA). For luciferase assays on organ extracts, mice were sacrificed, and whole organs dissected and homogenized in Promega's Cell Culture Lysis Reagent. Extracts were analyzed as described above for the in vitro work. Drinking water was supplemented with 5 mg/mL Doxycycline and 0.1% sodium saccharine for 6 days to suppress tTA-induced activation.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Abdul Waheed (Saint Louis University) for providing the anti-CAXII antibody in addition to all members of the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center for Transposon Research for continuous dedication to stimulating discussion. The authors were supported by N.I.D.A. grant R01-DA014764 (AMG, DAL), N.I.H. grant T32 HD007480 (AMG), and N.I.G.M.S. grant T32 GM08347 (AW).
- Ivics Z, Hackett PB, Plasterk RH, Izsvak Z: Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like transposon from fish, and its transposition in human cells. Cell. 1997, 91 (4): 501-510. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80436-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plasterk RH, Izsvak Z, Ivics Z: Resident aliens: the Tc1/mariner superfamily of transposable elements. Trends Genet. 1999, 15 (8): 326-332. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01777-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy AJ, Clark K, Carlson CM, Fritz S, Davidson AE, Markley KM, Finley K, Fletcher CF, Ekker SC, Hackett PB, Horn S, Largaespada DA: Mammalian germ-line transgenesis by transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99 (7): 4495-4499. 10.1073/pnas.062630599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carlson CM, Dupuy AJ, Fritz S, Roberg-Perez KJ, Fletcher CF, Largaespada DA: Transposon mutagenesis of the mouse germline. Genetics. 2003, 165 (1): 243-256.Google Scholar
- Horie K, Yusa K, Yae K, Odajima J, Fischer SE, Keng VW, Hayakawa T, Mizuno S, Kondoh G, Ijiri T, Matsuda Y, Plasterk RH, Takeda J: Characterization of Sleeping Beauty transposition and its application to genetic screening in mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23 (24): 9189-9207. 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9189-9207.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horie K, Kuroiwa A, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Kondoh G, Matsuda Y, Takeda J: Efficient chromosomal transposition of a Tc1/mariner- like transposon Sleeping Beauty in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (16): 9191-9196. 10.1073/pnas.161071798.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keng VW, Yae K, Hayakawa T, Mizuno S, Uno Y, Yusa K, Kokubu C, Kinoshita T, Akagi K, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Horie K, Takeda J: Region-specific saturation germline mutagenesis in mice using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system. Nat Methods. 2005, 2 (10): 763-769. 10.1038/nmeth795.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heine HL, Leong HS, Rossi FM, McManus BM, Podor TJ: Strategies of conditional gene expression in myocardium: an overview. Methods Mol Med. 2005, 112: 109-154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewandoski M: Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2 (10): 743-755. 10.1038/35093537.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ristevski S: Making better transgenic models: conditional, temporal, and spatial approaches. Mol Biotechnol. 2005, 29 (2): 153-163. 10.1385/MB:29:2:153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duffy JB: GAL4 system in Drosophila: a fly geneticist's Swiss army knife. Genesis. 2002, 34 (1-2): 1-15. 10.1002/gene.10150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gossen M, Bujard H: Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89 (12): 5547-5551. 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark KJ, Geurts AM, Bell JB, Hackett PB: Transposon vectors for gene-trap insertional mutagenesis in vertebrates. Genesis. 2004, 39 (4): 225-233. 10.1002/gene.20049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cui Z, Geurts AM, Liu G, Kaufman CD, Hackett PB: Structure-function analysis of the inverted terminal repeats of the sleeping beauty transposon. J Mol Biol. 2002, 318 (5): 1221-1235. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00237-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gossen M, Freundlieb S, Bender G, Muller G, Hillen W, Bujard H: Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. Science. 1995, 268 (5218): 1766-1769.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy AJ, Fritz S, Largaespada DA: Transposition and gene disruption in the male germline of the mouse. Genesis. 2001, 30 (2): 82-88. 10.1002/gene.1037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fischer SE, Wienholds E, Plasterk RH: Regulated transposition of a fish transposon in the mouse germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (12): 6759-6764. 10.1073/pnas.121569298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gu H, Marth JD, Orban PC, Mossmann H, Rajewsky K: Deletion of a DNA polymerase beta gene segment in T cells using cell type-specific gene targeting. Science. 1994, 265 (5168): 103-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orban PC, Chui D, Marth JD: Tissue- and site-specific DNA recombination in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89 (15): 6861-6865. 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6861.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sauer B: Manipulation of transgenes by site-specific recombination: use of Cre recombinase. Methods Enzymol. 1993, 225: 890-900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Collier LS, Carlson CM, Ravimohan S, Dupuy AJ, Largaespada DA: Cancer gene discovery in solid tumours using transposon-based somatic mutagenesis in the mouse. Nature. 2005, 436 (7048): 272-276. 10.1038/nature03681.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halmi P, Lehtonen J, Waheed A, Sly WS, Parkkila S: Expression of hypoxia-inducible, membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase isozyme XII in mouse tissues. Anat Rec. 2004, 277A (1): 171-177. 10.1002/ar.a.20001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hynninen P, Hamalainen JM, Pastorekova S, Pastorek J, Waheed A, Sly WS, Tomas E, Kirkinen P, Parkkila S: Transmembrane carbonic anhydrase isozymes IX and XII in the female mouse reproductive organs. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004, 2 (1): 73-10.1186/1477-7827-2-73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kistner A, Gossen M, Zimmermann F, Jerecic J, Ullmer C, Lubbert H, Bujard H: Doxycycline-mediated quantitative and tissue-specific control of gene expression in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (20): 10933-10938. 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hasan MT, Schonig K, Berger S, Graewe W, Bujard H: Long-term, noninvasive imaging of regulated gene expression in living mice. Genesis. 2001, 29 (3): 116-122. 10.1002/gene.1014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pietri T, Thiery JP, Dufour S: Differential expression of beta3 integrin gene in chick and mouse cranial neural crest cells. Dev Dyn. 2003, 227 (2): 309-313. 10.1002/dvdy.10299.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin CM, Chen HJ, Leung CL, Parry DA, Liem RK: Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1b: a novel plakin that localizes to the Golgi complex. J Cell Sci. 2005, 118 (Pt 16): 3727-3738. 10.1242/jcs.02510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fedorov LM, Tyrsin OY, Krenn V, Chernigovskaya EV, Rapp UR: Tet-system for the regulation of gene expression during embryonic development. Transgenic Res. 2001, 10 (3): 247-258. 10.1023/A:1016632110931.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Furth PA, St Onge L, Boger H, Gruss P, Gossen M, Kistner A, Bujard H, Hennighausen L: Temporal control of gene expression in transgenic mice by a tetracycline-responsive promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91 (20): 9302-9306. 10.1073/pnas.91.20.9302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Henikoff S: Conspiracy of silence among repeated transgenes. Bioessays. 1998, 20 (7): 532-535. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199807)20:7<532::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen WV, Delrow J, Corrin PD, Frazier JP, Soriano P: Identification and validation of PDGF transcriptional targets by microarray-coupled gene-trap mutagenesis. Nat Genet. 2004, 36 (3): 304-312. 10.1038/ng1306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niwa H, Araki K, Kimura S, Taniguchi S, Wakasugi S, Yamamura K: An efficient gene-trap method using poly A trap vectors and characterization of gene-trap events. J Biochem (Tokyo). 1993, 113 (3): 343-349.Google Scholar
- Skarnes WC, Auerbach BA, Joyner AL: A gene trap approach in mouse embryonic stem cells: the lacZ reported is activated by splicing, reflects endogenous gene expression, and is mutagenic in mice. Genes Dev. 1992, 6 (6): 903-918.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skarnes WC: Gene trapping methods for the identification and functional analysis of cell surface proteins in mice. Methods Enzymol. 2000, 328: 592-615.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chappell SA, Edelman GM, Mauro VP: A 9-nt segment of a cellular mRNA can function as an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and when present in linked multiple copies greatly enhances IRES activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (4): 1536-1541. 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1536.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gerlitz O, Nellen D, Ottiger M, Basler K: A screen for genes expressed in Drosophila imaginal discs. Int J Dev Biol. 2002, 46 (1): 173-176.Google Scholar
- Martin JR, Keller A, Sweeney ST: Targeted expression of tetanus toxin: a new tool to study the neurobiology of behavior. Adv Genet. 2002, 47: 1-47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lemmen JG, Arends RJ, van der Saag PT, van der Burg B: In vivo imaging of activated estrogen receptors in utero by estrogens and bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect. 2004, 112 (15): 1544-1549.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lipshutz GS, Gruber CA, Cao Y, Hardy J, Contag CH, Gaensler KM: In utero delivery of adeno-associated viral vectors: intraperitoneal gene transfer produces long-term expression. Mol Ther. 2001, 3 (3): 284-292. 10.1006/mthe.2001.0267.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baron U, Freundlieb S, Gossen M, Bujard H: Co-regulation of two gene activities by tetracycline via a bidirectional promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23 (17): 3605-3606.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krestel HE, Mayford M, Seeburg PH, Sprengel R: A GFP-equipped bidirectional expression module well suited for monitoring tetracycline-regulated gene expression in mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (7): E39-10.1093/nar/29.7.e39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang CJ, Spinella F, Nazarian R, Lee MM, Dopp JM, de Vellis J: Expression of green fluorescent protein in oligodendrocytes in a time- and level-controllable fashion with a tetracycline-regulated system. Mol Med. 1999, 5 (2): 129-137.Google Scholar
- Saam JR, Gordon JI: Inducible gene knockouts in the small intestinal and colonic epithelium. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (53): 38071-38082. 10.1074/jbc.274.53.38071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ye L, Chan S, Chow YH, Tsui LC, Hu J: Regulated expression of the human CFTR gene in epithelial cells. Mol Ther. 2001, 3 (5 Pt 1): 723-733. 10.1006/mthe.2001.0314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noh MJ, Kim SJ, Kang YK, Yoo OJ: Sequences responsible for transcription termination of the mouse gastrin gene. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1995, 35 (6): 1205-1213.Google Scholar
- Adams DJ, Quail MA, Cox T, van der Weyden L, Gorick BD, Su Q, Chan WI, Davies R, Bonfield JK, Law F, Humphray S, Plumb B, Liu P, Rogers J, Bradley A: A genome-wide, end-sequenced 129Sv BAC library resource for targeting vector construction. Genomics. 2005, 86 (6): 753-758. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.08.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilber A, Frandsen JL, Wangensteen KJ, Ekker SC, Wang X, McIvor RS: Dynamic gene expression after systemic delivery of plasmid DNA as determined by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. Hum Gene Ther. 2005, 16 (11): 1325-1332. 10.1089/hum.2005.16.1325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.