Skip to main content

DNAzyme-mediated recovery of small recombinant RNAs from a 5S rRNA-derived chimera expressed in Escherichia coli



Manufacturing large quantities of recombinant RNAs by overexpression in a bacterial host is hampered by their instability in intracellular environment. To overcome this problem, an RNA of interest can be fused into a stable bacterial RNA for the resulting chimeric construct to accumulate in the cytoplasm to a sufficiently high level. Being supplemented with cost-effective procedures for isolation of the chimera from cells and recovery of the recombinant RNA from stabilizing scaffold, this strategy might become a viable alternative to the existing methods of chemical or enzymatic RNA synthesis.


Sequence encoding a 71-nucleotide recombinant RNA was inserted into a plasmid-borne deletion mutant of the Vibrio proteolyticus 5S rRNA gene in place of helix III - loop C segment of the original 5S rRNA. After transformation into Escherichia coli, the chimeric RNA (3×pen aRNA) was expressed constitutively from E. coli rrnB P1 and P2 promoters. The RNA chimera accumulated to levels that exceeded those of the host's 5S rRNA. A novel method relying on liquid-solid partitioning of cellular constituents was developed for isolation of total RNA from bacterial cells. This protocol avoids toxic chemicals, and is therefore more suitable for large scale RNA purification than traditional methods. A pair of biotinylated 8-17 DNAzymes was used to bring about the quantitative excision of the 71-nt recombinant RNA from the chimera. The recombinant RNA was isolated by sequence-specific capture on beads with immobilized complementary deoxyoligonucleotide, while DNAzymes were recovered by biotin affinity chromatography for reuse.


The feasibility of a fermentation-based approach for manufacturing large quantities of small RNAs in vivo using a "5S rRNA scaffold" strategy is demonstrated. The approach provides a route towards an economical method for the large-scale production of small RNAs including shRNAs, siRNAs and aptamers for use in clinical and biomedical research.


In recent years, small RNAs, including siRNAs (small interfering RNAs), shRNAs (small hairpin RNAs), aptamers, and ribozymes [19] have attracted increasing interest for their fundamental role in gene regulation, as well as for the potential of their use as novel diagnostic and therapeutic agents [1016]. Interfering RNAs have generated particular interest due to its ability to effectively silence genes. For example, large-scale RNAi screens have been conducted to identify important genes in various biological pathways [17]. Multiple siRNA-based therapies are currently under development and soon may be used in the treatment of diseases such as hepatitis virus infection, macular degeneration, leukemia, and acquired immune deficiency syndrome [1821]. Likewise, due to their high affinity and relatively low cost, aptamers have been used in numerous investigations seeking novel diagnostic tools or new drugs [7, 2225]. For example, an anticoagulant RNA aptamer that specifically binds and inactivates Factor IXa, is currently in Phase II clinical trials [23, 26]. With the expanding use of small RNAs in basic and applied biological research, the demand for large quantities of synthetic RNAs of high quality has dramatically increased. Traditional methods of chemical and enzymatic synthesis are effective but are currently very expensive when large amounts are needed. Thus, a cost-effective method to produce defined small RNAs in large quantities is urgently needed.

The in vivo expression of recombinant RNAs has been described for some time [2729]. However, the heterogeneity of the RNA products and their instability in the cytoplasm due to cleavage by cellular ribonucleases (RNases) have made the process inefficient. For example, mRNAs expressed in E. coli from T7 promoter exhibit a substantial heterogeneity due to ambiguous termination of the RNA transcripts [28, 29]. Attempts to obtain in vivo expression of aptamers also were not successful, apparently because the resulting transcripts were again heterogeneous and did not accumulate to any substantial level [30]. One way to overcome these limitations is by expressing RNA molecules of interest in a tRNA scaffold [30, 31]. In one such study, the epsilon sequence of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) was inserted into cloning sites surrounded by a tRNALys or tRNAMet scaffold under the control of E. coli lpp promoter. The tRNA scaffold formed a structure that protected the RNA insert from nucleolytic digestion. The tRNA-HBV chimera was shown to be successfully expressed in E. coli and could be extracted by affinity capture when the chimeric RNA contained in addition a sephadex or streptavidin aptamer module. The RNA insert was released from the tRNA scaffold using the enzyme RNase H and two unmodified guide deoxyoligonucleotides. However, the reported absolute positional specificity of RNA cleavage by RNase H is uncommon under the described conditions [3234], and cannot be regarded as a general case. In addition, it is not yet known if a large variety of RNAs can be successfully prepared with this system or how the presence of the construct may affect the host cell.

Herein, a fermentation-based system for expressing and purifying functional RNAs, especially RNAs of less than 100 nucleotides, is described. In this system, RNA sequences of interest are expressed under the strong P1 and P2 ribosomal promoters from the E. coli rrnB operon in the context of a carrier derived from 5S rRNA [35]. The resulting RNA product does not enter the ribosome but nevertheless accumulates to levels comparable to those of wild type 5S rRNA. In previous work with this system, various RNA insert sequences were incorporated into the plasmid-encoded 5S rRNA scaffold [36, 37]. In each case, the expressed RNA/insert chimeras accumulated to high levels in the cell. An examination of the transcriptome revealed that the presence of the insert had essentially no effect on gene expression in the host cell [38]. In order for this approach to be broadly applicable, however, it will be necessary to extract the RNA of interest from the 5S rRNA carrier. We demonstrate herein that this can be effectively accomplished using sequence-specific DNAzymes [3943]. An RNA substrate known as the 3×pen aRNA [37] (Figure 1) is used as a model system. The insert in this case is highly structured, as are many of the RNAs of interest and, at 71 nucleotides, illustrates that relatively large RNAs can be expressed in the 5S rRNA carrier system with good success.

Figure 1
figure 1

Sequence and predicted secondary structure of 3× pen aRNA (160 nt). Sequence outside the grey box is the 5S rRNA scaffold, Bst aRNA [35], and sequence inside the grey box is RNA insert (figure modified from [37]). DNAzymes Pen17zyme1, -1B, and -1C are expected to cut 3×pen aRNA after nucleotide 94, and Pen17zyme2 is expected to cut after nucleotide 23. The excision sites on 3×pen aRNA are marked by arrows, and the expected excision product is 71 nucleotides long.



Enzymes were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI) or New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). Synthetic deoxyoligonucleotides (Table 1) were obtained from Eurofins MWG (Huntsville, AL) and IDT (Coralville, IA). DNA markers were purchased from NEB and Bionexus (Oakland, CA). Chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ).

Table 1 Sequences and modifications of deoxyoligonucleotides used in this study

RNA expression scaffold

Plasmid pCP3×3 [37] was electroporated into E. coli JM109 (DE3) (Promega) and used as the RNA expression scaffold in this work. The core element of the plasmid is the truncated 5S rRNA gene from Vibrio proteolyticus with a 71-nt insertion sequence. Gene expression is controlled by the E. coli rrnB P1 and P2 promoters. 3×pen aRNA coding sequence is followed by the E. coli rrnB T1 and T2 transcription terminators.

Isolation of small RNAs from E. coli

Cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium with constant shaking (250 rpm). 100 μg/ml ampicillin was added to plasmid-carrying cells. Cell growth (OD600) was monitored using a Labomed Spectro SC spectrophometer. After incubation, cells were collected by centrifugation (30 min, 5000 × g, 4°C). The resulting (typically 200 mg) pellet was resuspended in 960 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Cells were lysed by adding 160 μl of 1 M Tris-Acetate with 0.1 M EDTA (pH 7.5), 160 μl of 10% SDS and 320 μl of pure formamide. After 20 min shaking at 37°C, 1.6 ml of 3 M potassium acetate (pH 4.8) was added, and the mixture was shaken gently for another 10 min. Cell debris and precipitated material were removed by centrifugation (20 min, 10000 × g, 4°C). The cleared supernatant was recovered and mixed with 8 ml of ethanol. After 1 h incubation at -80°C, the precipitated nucleic acids were collected by centrifugation (20 min, 10000 × g, 4°C). The pellet was then resuspended in 300 μl of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0), and was shaken at 37°C for 10 min to selectively solubilize the small RNAs. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation (20 min, 10000 × g, 4°C), and the supernatant was mixed with 750 μl of ethanol. Finally, the precipitate containing mostly small RNAs was collected by centrifugation (20 min, 10000 × g, 4°C), washed twice with 70% ethanol, and air dried for 15 min.

RNA samples were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and staining as previously described [44, 45]. Low Molecular Weight DNA Ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) was used as molecular weight standards. The ratio of 3×pen aRNA accumulation level to that of 5S rRNA was determined using the freely available software package, ImageJ [46].

Preparative PAGE

The 3×pen aRNA was purified to homogeneity by electrophoresis on an 8% preparative denaturing polyacrylamide gel. After separation, RNA bands were visualized by UV shadowing over Silica F254 TLC plates (Whatman), and excised using a sterile blade. RNA was eluted from gel slices by triple extraction with equal volumes of 50 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 19.2 M formamide. RNA was precipitated from the collected extracts by mixing with 0.1 vol. 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0) and 2.5 vol. ethanol. The sample was centrifuged (20 min, 10000 × g, 4°C), the collected precipitate was washed twice with 70% ethanol, and air dried for 15 min. Dry RNA pellets were dissolved in water, and their concentration was determined spectrophotometrically.

Cleavage with DNAzymes

The DNAzymes used for the excision of RNA fragments from the 5S rRNA scaffold are listed in Table 1. The reaction conditions screened during optimization of 3×pen aRNA cleavage are summarized in Table 2. DNAzymes were annealed to the 3×pen aRNA substrate in 50 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.2) containing additional components as specified in Table 2, at 90°C for 2 min, and then cooled to 23°C over 10 min in a thermal cycler (Eurofins-MWG). After annealing, the mixture of DNAzymes and aRNA was adjusted to contain 125 mM KCl, 500 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, MnCl2 (up to 45 mM), and 50 mM MOPS (pH 7.2) besides the indicated additional components, and incubated at 23°C or 40°C for up to 72 hours. In reaction 16 and 23, 50 and 6 additional cycles were introduced, respectively. After the incubation, the reaction was terminated by adding 0.1 vol. 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0). The reaction products were recovered by ethanol precipitation and analyzed by denaturing PAGE. The intensity of bands in these reactions was plotted using the 'profile' function of ImageJ [46], and the total cutting percentage was quantified as P = 1 - [intact 3×pen aRNA]/[total 3×pen aRNA]. Similarly, ImageJ was used to determine the yield of final product relative to the starting amount of chimeric aRNA per wet cell paste.

Table 2 Conditions of 3×pen aRNA cleavage evaluated during optimization of the reaction yield.

Isolation of 5'-biotinylated DNAzymes and RNA Fragments by Affinity Capture

Biotinylated DNAzymes were removed from the mixture of cleavage reaction products using streptavidin agarose beads (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in 3× NTE buffer (0.6 M NaCl, 15 mM Tris-HCl, 7.5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) [47]. The DNAzymes were recovered from the beads by heating in H2O at 65°C. The excised RNA fragments were isolated by affinity capture through hybridization to a complementary oligodeoxyribonucleotide, bioantiPEN (Table 1), immobilized on streptavidin agarose beads via streptavidin-biotin linkage [47].

Results and Discussion

Expression of 3×penaRNA in strain JM109 (DE3)

The 160-nt 3×pen aRNA was strongly expressed in E. coli (Figure 2 and Figure 3A, Lane 1). The ratio of 3×pen aRNA to 5S rRNA after 8 and 24 h of incubation was 1.07 and 0.46, respectively, as determined by electrophoresis and imaging as described above. Thus, the accumulation of 3×pen aRNA after an 8-hour incubation slightly exceeded that of native 5S rRNA but subsequently declined, suggesting selective degradation of the recombinant RNA over time. Isolation of 3×pen aRNA from 8-hour bacterial cultures routinely yielded 2.5 - 2.6 mg of the chimeric RNA from 1 g of wet cells.

Figure 2
figure 2

pen aRNA cleavage by Pen17zyme1, Pen17zyme1B or Pen17zyme1C. Cleavage reaction products were analyzed on denaturing 8% PAGE. The expected cleavage products are 94-nt 5' terminal and 66-nt 3' terminal halves of 160-nt 3×pen aRNA. Lane 1, 3×pen aRNA cleavage with Pen17zyme1; Lane 2, 3×pen aRNA cleavage with Pen17zyme1B; Lane 3, 3×pen aRNA cleavage with Pen17zyme 1C. Cleavage reactions were set up as follows: RNA substrate and indicated DNAzyme were annealed in 50 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.2), 500 μM spermine by incubating the mixture at 90°C for 2 min followed by cooling to 23°C within 10 min. After annealing, the composition of the mixture was adjusted to 125 mM KCl, 500 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 15 mM MnCl2, 150 μM spermine, and 50 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.2), with 3×pen aRNA: DNAzyme molar ratio 1: 5. The reaction was performed at 23°C for 16 hours, and stopped by ethanol precipitation of the products.

Figure 3
figure 3

pen aRNA cleavage by Pen17zyme1B and Pen17zyme2. Cleavage reaction products were analyzed on denaturing 8% PAGE. Incubation of 3×pen aRNA (160 nt) with the Pen17zyme1B and Pen17zyme2 resulted in accumulation of 71-nt final excision product and 137-nt semi-product. (A) Lane 1, total RNA from E. coli JM109(DE3)/pCP3×3 enriched for low molecular weight RNAs (total RNA); Lane 2, low molecular weight DNA ladder (LWM); Lane 3, 3×pen aRNA; Lanes 4-6, Cleavage products of 3×pen aRNA after 17 hours of incubation with 3×pen aRNA: Pen17zyme1B: Pen17zyme2 molar ratio 1:1:1, 1:10:1, and 1:10:2, respectively. (B) Lane 1, total RNA; Lane 2, LWM; Lane 3, 3×pen aRNA; Lane 4, Cleavage products of 3×pen aRNA after 40 hours of incubation with 3×pen aRNA: Pen17zyme1B: Pen17zyme2 molar ratio 1:10:1. (C): Lane 1, total RNA; Lane 2, LWM; Lane 3, 3×pen aRNA; Lane 4, Cleavage products of 3×pen aRNA after 40 hours of incubation with 3×pen aRNA: Pen17zyme1B: Pen17zyme2 molar ratio 1:10:10. (D): Lane 1, LWM; Lane 2, total RNA; Lane 3, equimolar mixture of Pen17zyme1B and Pen17zyme2; Lane 4, 3×pen aRNA; Lane 5, Cleavage products of 3×pen aRNA after 72 hours of incubation with 3×pen aRNA: Pen17zyme1B: Pen17zyme2 molar ratio 1:10:10. Cleavage reactions were performed under conditions described in legend to Figure 2 except for the incubation time and 3×pen aRNA: DNazymes molar ratio, which were as indicated above.

Excision of specific small RNA using DNAzymes

In order to optimize the cleavage reaction, multiple reaction conditions were examined (Table 2) by varying DNAzymes, RNA substrate to DNAzymes ratio, additives, Mn2+ concentration, reaction temperature, and incubation time. In some cases, alternating denaturation and renaturation cycles were introduced to examine whether this increased the overall yield of the desired RNA products. Equal amounts of 3×pen aRNA were used in each reaction condition, and the reaction products were analyzed by denaturing PAGE. Four DNAzymes (Pen17zyme1, -1B, -1C and -2) were investigated for their ability to excise small RNAs from the 5S rRNA expression scaffold. Their predicted excision sites on the 3×pen aRNA are shown in Figure 1, and cleavage at these two sites was expected to produce a 71-nt product. As revealed by electrophoresis, the overall yield of the desired RNA products was higher with Pen17zyme1B than with Pen17zyme1, while Pen17zyme1C was found to be inactive (Figure 2). Thus, Pen17zyme1B, which cleaves GA dinucleotides, and Pen17zyme2, which cleaves GG dinucleotides (Figure 1), were used in subsequent cleavage reactions. Additionally, the 5'-biotinylated DNAzymes were found to cleave with equal efficiency as their unmodified forms, and the expected 71-nt product was obtained likewise by cleavage reactions using 5'-biotinylated bioPen17zyme1B and bioPen17zyme2 (Figure 4, Lane 3). Intensity of the 3×pen aRNA band on the polyacrylamide gel (Figure 3) decreased when the concentration of Pen17zyme1B and Pen17zyme2 increased in the reaction mixtures, indicating that 3×pen aRNA was being efficiently cleaved by these DNAzymes. Complete excision was achieved after 72 h incubation at 23°C and a molar ratio of [3×pen aRNA]: [Pen17zyme1B]: [Pen17zyme2] of 1:10:10 (Table 3).

Figure 4
figure 4

Separation of the products of 3× pen aRNA cleavage using streptavidin agarose beads. Collected fractions were analyzed on denaturing 8% PAGE. Lane1, LWM; Lane 2, 3×pen aRNA; Lane 3, Original cleavage reaction mixture; Lanes 4-5: Isolation of biotinylated DNAzymes, first and second elutions from the beads, respectively; Lane 6: Isolation of 71-nt excision product on the beads saturated with biotinylated complementary deoxyoligonucleotide, bioantiPEN; Lane 7: Recovery of bioantiPEN from the beads. Cleavage reaction was performed for 72 hours under conditions described in legend to Figure 2, with 3×pen aRNA: bioPen17zyme1B: bioPen17zyme2 molar ratio 1:10:10.

Table 3 Quantitative analysis of total cleavage percentage P of 3×pen aRNA by Pen17zyme1B and Pen17zyme2

In most cases, the presence of additional components in the annealing buffer including ethanol, PEG 8000, potassium acetate, LiCl and increased concentrations of KCl or NaCl did not affect the overall yield of the desired RNA product. However, the addition of 500 μM spermine improved the total cutting percentage significantly. It is thought that the spermine may stabilize the DNAzyme/RNA hybrids [48]. Spermine-mediated stabilization of DNA helices [49] and DNA-RNA hybrids [50, 51] has been extensively reported in the literature. Previous studies of DNAzymes have shown that substrate cleavage required divalent metal cations such as Mg2+, Ca2+ or Mn2+ [5255]. Here, the effects of four different Mn2+ conditions (0, 7.5, 15 and 45 mM) were tested. We confirmed that in the absence of Mn2+, essentially no cleavage was seen and that the highest total cutting percentage was observed at 15 mM Mn2+. With respect to the reaction temperature, it was found that 23°C was superior to 40°C in producing efficient RNA processing (data not shown). Introducing denaturation/renaturation cycles into the reaction did not improve the overall yield of the desired RNA products. Perhaps not surprisingly, it was also found that longer incubation time greatly improved the total cutting percentage when the same concentration of DNAzymes was added in the reaction mixture (Table 3).

In summary, the best conditions among those tested were as follows: (i) a substrate to enzyme molar ratio ([3×pen aRNA]:[Pen17zyme1B]:[Pen17zyme2]) of 1:10:10, (ii) denaturation and annealing in 50 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.2), 500 μM spermine at 90°C for 2 min with subsequent cooling to 23°C over a period of 10 min, (iii) incubation in 125 mM KCl, 500 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 15 mM MnCl2, 150 μM spermine, and 50 mM MOPS-NaOH (pH 7.2), at 23°C for 72 h. As suggested by Table 3, longer incubation time is likely to further improve overall yield of the desired RNA fragment.

RNA and DNAzyme Recovery by Affinity Capture

It is desirable that the isolation of the RNA product and recovery of DNAzymes avoid labor-intensive procedures. Following the cleavage reaction, the 5'-biotinylated Pen17zymes 1B and -2 were successfully removed from the reaction mixture by affinity chromatography, heat eluted (Figure 4, lane 4 & 5) and could presumably be reused in new cleavage reactions. After removal of the DNAzymes, the reaction mixture was purified by hybridization affinity capture on an immobilized oligonucleotide bioantiPEN, which is complementary to the desired RNA product. Figure 4 illustrates that the RNA eluate from the affinity matrix contained the 71-nt excised RNA fragment, indicating the expected digestion of 3×pen aRNA. The RNA product was found to be 82% pure as determined by electrophoresis and imaging as described above. The overall yield of the purified RNA fragment was 0.72 mg from 1 g of cells. However, trace amounts of deoxyoligonucleotide bioantiPEN were found in the RNA elution fraction (Figure 4, lane 6). If desired, this contamination could be easily removed by DNase treatment of the excised RNA fraction. Alternatively, this contamination could be prevented by covalent immobilization of the capture oligo on rigid supports like glass or silica.


The feasibility of an E. coli based in vivo expression system capable of producing small RNAs using a 5S rRNA scaffold has been demonstrated. The DNA construct is recognized as essentially a normal RNA coding region and the resulting transcript is processed into a single RNA species of defined sequence and length. The strong expression of chimeric 3×pen aRNA here and in nearly twenty other 5S rRNA/insert chimeras examined in previous studies [36, 56] demonstrates that the 5S rRNA scaffold is robust and can accommodate many RNA inserts of diverse sizes.

Here, we have also described a new method for total RNA isolation. Compared to traditional RNA isolation methods such as Trizol™ [57, 58] or hot phenol extractions, the new method does not involve toxic chemicals. Thus, it is safer to the user, more environmentally friendly, and might be particularly advantageous for scale-up. The new method also displays some degree of desirable size selectivity, in that low molecular weight RNAs appeared to have been enriched, while the amount of larger RNAs had been reduced at the end of the RNA isolation procedure.

In addition, we demonstrated the successful excision of a 3×pen aRNA from the scaffold using 8-17 DNAzymes Pen17zyme1B and Pen17zyme2. Since DNAzymes can be readily obtained from various commercial sources, and the reaction preferentially occurs at room temperature (23°C), it constitutes an attractive method for the large scale preparation of small RNAs through fermentation of E. coli. Under best reaction conditions, nearly all the 3×pen aRNA was digested, and 90% of it was further processed to yield the desired 71-nt RNA product after 72 h. Depending on the requirements, the rate of cleavage can be manipulated by adjusting the DNAzyme-to-RNA ratio to either speed up the process or conserve DNAzymes. In an industrial environment, the priority might be given to reducing the costs of reagents vs. the reaction rate. Manufacturing processes usually involve continuous operations, and under such circumstances the time for individual reaction cycles may not be as important as the cost for labor, chemicals, and equipment.

In a further step towards improving the economical attractiveness of the method, we have shown recovery of both the RNA product and the DNAzymes through affinity chromatography. Although DNA oligomers can be chemically synthesized, the ability to readily recycle the DNAzymes will substantially reduce the cost of the whole procedure. In the present study, affinity chromatography of streptavidin agarose beads was employed to demonstrate the possibility of recovering DNAzymes. Future studies may include covalent immobilization of DNAzymes on more durable and less expensive supports such as glass or silica, which would be more compatible with industrial applications. In addition, it was shown that a longer incubation time greatly improved the overall yield of desired RNA product with equal concentration of DNAzymes in the reaction mixtures. Therefore, the cost of DNAzymes can be further reduced by trading off speed for cost.

In summary, a fermentation-based approach to large scale RNA production of functional RNAs using the 5S rRNA scaffold strategy is described. The approach combines high levels of in vivo expression, convenient purification of chimeric RNAs and cost-efficient excision of insert RNA from the chimera and therefore offers a promising alternative for large scale RNA manufacturing.



ribonucleic acid


deoxyribonucleic acid

5S rRNA:

5S ribosomal RNA


messenger RNA


transfer RNA




RNA interference


polyethylene glycol


polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis




thin-layer chromatography


ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid


N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid


3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid.


  1. Kaur G, Roy I: Therapeutic applications of aptamers. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008, 17: 43-60. 10.1517/13543784.17.1.43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pai SS, Ellington AD: Using RNA aptamers and the proximity ligation assay for the detection of cell surface antigens. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 504: 385-398. full_text.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee C, Dhillon J, Wang MY, Gao Y, Hu K, Park E, Astanehe A, Hung MC, Eirew P, Eaves CJ, Dunn SE: Targeting YB-1 in HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer cells induces apoptosis via the mTOR/STAT3 pathway and suppresses tumor growth in mice. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 8661-8666. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu TC, Twu KY, Ellington AD, Levy M: Aptamer mediated siRNA delivery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: e73-10.1093/nar/gkl388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalk AM, Warfinge RE, Georgii-Hemming P, Sonnhammer EL: siRNAdb: a database of siRNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, D131-134. 33 Database

  6. Sefah K, Phillips JA, Xiong X, Meng L, Van Simaeys D, Chen H, Martin J, Tan W: Nucleic acid aptamers for biosensors and bio-analytical applications. Analyst. 2009, 134: 1765-1775. 10.1039/b905609m.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dausse E, Da Rocha Gomes S, Toulme JJ: Aptamers: a new class of oligonucleotides in the drug discovery pipeline?. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009, 9: 602-607. 10.1016/j.coph.2009.07.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Winkler WC, Nahvi A, Roth A, Collins JA, Breaker RR: Control of gene expression by a natural metabolite-responsive ribozyme. Nature. 2004, 428: 281-286. 10.1038/nature02362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrick JE, Corbino KA, Winkler WC, Nahvi A, Mandal M, Collins J, Lee M, Roth A, Sudarsan N, Jona I, Wickiser JK, Breaker RR: New RNA motifs suggest an expanded scope for riboswitches in bacterial genetic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 6421-6426. 10.1073/pnas.0308014101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanzaki LI, Ornelas SS, Arganaraz ER: RNA interference and HIV-1 infection. Rev Med Virol. 2008, 18: 5-18. 10.1002/rmv.553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lea MA: Recently identified and potential targets for colon cancer treatment. Future Oncol. 2010, 6: 993-1002. 10.2217/fon.10.53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfeffer S, Baumert TF: Impact of microRNAs for pathogenesis and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterol Clin Biol.

  13. Thoma C, Bogner E: Short hairpin RNAs specific to human cytomegalovirus terminase subunit pUL89 prevent viral maturation. Antivir Ther. 2010, 15: 391-400. 10.3851/IMP1536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gebhardt K, Shokraei A, Babaie E, Lindqvist BH: RNA aptamers to S-adenosylhomocysteine: kinetic properties, divalent cation dependency, and comparison with anti-S-adenosylhomocysteine antibody. Biochemistry. 2000, 39: 7255-7265. 10.1021/bi000295t.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCauley TG, Hamaguchi N, Stanton M: Aptamer-based biosensor arrays for detection and quantification of biological macromolecules. Anal Biochem. 2003, 319: 244-250. 10.1016/S0003-2697(03)00297-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajendran M, Ellington AD: Selecting nucleic acids for biosensor applications. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2002, 5: 263-270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alekseev OM, Richardson RT, Alekseev O, O'Rand MG: Analysis of gene expression profiles in HeLa cells in response to overexpression or siRNA-mediated depletion of NASP. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009, 7: 45-10.1186/1477-7827-7-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Capodici J, Kariko K, Weissman D: Inhibition of HIV-1 infection by small interfering RNA-mediated RNA interference. J Immunol. 2002, 169: 5196-5201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Coemans B, Takahashi Y, Berberich T, Ito A, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Saitoh H, Tsuda S, Kamoun S, Sagi L, Swennen R, Terauchi R: High-throughput in planta expression screening identifies an ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF1) involved in non-host resistance and R gene-mediated resistance. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008, 9: 25-36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei L, Liu X, Cao C: [RNA interference and its application in inhibiting HIV-1 infection]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2005, 21: 516-519.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sagan SM, Nasheri N, Luebbert C, Pezacki JP: The efficacy of siRNAs against hepatitis C virus is strongly influenced by structure and target site accessibility. Chem Biol. 2010, 17: 515-527. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.04.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Majumder P, Gomes KN, Ulrich H: Aptamers: from bench side research towards patented molecules with therapeutic applications. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2009, 19: 1603-1613. 10.1517/13543770903313746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rusconi CP, Roberts JD, Pitoc GA, Nimjee SM, White RR, Quick G, Scardino E, Fay WP, Sullenger BA: Antidote-mediated control of an anticoagulant aptamer in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 1423-1428. 10.1038/nbt1023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mi J, Zhang X, Rabbani ZN, Liu Y, Reddy SK, Su Z, Salahuddin FK, Viles K, Giangrande PH, Dewhirst MW, Sullenger BA, Kontos CD, Clary BM: RNA aptamer-targeted inhibition of NF-kappa B suppresses non-small cell lung cancer resistance to doxorubicin. Mol Ther. 2008, 16: 66-73. 10.1038/

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarraf-Yazdi S, Mi J, Moeller BJ, Niu X, White RR, Kontos CD, Sullenger BA, Dewhirst MW, Clary BM: Inhibition of in vivo tumor angiogenesis and growth via systemic delivery of an angiopoietin 2-specific RNA aptamer. J Surg Res. 2008, 146: 16-23. 10.1016/j.jss.2007.04.028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan MY, Cohen MG, Dyke CK, Myles SK, Aberle LG, Lin M, Walder J, Steinhubl SR, Gilchrist IC, Kleiman NS, Vorchheimer DA, Chronos N, Melloni C, Alexander JH, Harrington RA, Tonkens RM, Becker RC, Rusconi CP: Phase 1b randomized study of antidote-controlled modulation of factor IXa activity in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2008, 117: 2865-2874. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.745687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lago BD, Birnbaum J, Demain AL: Fermentation process for double-stranded ribonucleic acid, an interferon inducer. Appl Microbiol. 1972, 24: 430-436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Studier FW, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Dubendorff JW: Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 185: 60-89. full_text.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lopez PJ, Dreyfus M: The lacZ mRNA can be stabilised by the T7 late mRNA leader in E. coli. Biochimie. 1996, 78: 408-415. 10.1016/0300-9084(96)84747-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ponchon L, Dardel F: Recombinant RNA technology: the tRNA scaffold. Nat Methods. 2007, 4: 571-576. 10.1038/nmeth1058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ponchon L, Beauvais G, Nonin-Lecomte S, Dardel F: A generic protocol for the expression and purification of recombinant RNA in Escherichia coli using a tRNA scaffold. Nat Protocols. 2009, 4: 947-959. 10.1038/nprot.2009.67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanaya S: Prokaryotic type 2 RNases H. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 341 (Pt A): 377-394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Inoue H, Hayase Y, Iwai S, Ohtsuka E: Sequence-dependent hydrolysis of RNA using modified oligonucleotide splints and RNase H. FEBS Lett. 1987, 215: 327-330. 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80171-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lima WF, Mohan V, Crooke ST: The influence of antisense oligonucleotide-induced RNA structure on Escherichia coli RNase H1 activity. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 18191-18199. 10.1074/jbc.272.29.18191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pitulle C, Hedenstierna KO, Fox GE: A novel approach for monitoring genetically engineered microorganisms by using artificial, stable RNAs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 3661-3666.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. D'Souza LM, Larios-Sanz M, Setterquist RA, Willson RC, Fox GE: Small RNA sequences are readily stabilized by inclusion in a carrier rRNA. Biotechnol Prog. 2003, 19: 734-738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pitulle C, D'Souza L, Fox GE: A low molecular weight artificial RNA of unique size with multiple probe target regions. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1997, 20: 133-136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tucker DL, Karouia F, Wang J, Luo Y, Li TB, Willson RC, Fofanov Y, Fox GE: Effect of an artificial RNA marker on gene expression in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 4156-4159. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4156-4159.2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Breaker RR: Natural and engineered nucleic acids as tools to explore biology. Nature. 2004, 432: 838-845. 10.1038/nature03195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Breaker RR: Making Catalytic DNAs. Science. 2000, 290: 2095-2096. 10.1126/science.290.5499.2095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Breaker RR, Joyce GF: A DNA enzyme with Mg(2+)-dependent RNA phosphoesterase activity. Chem Biol. 1995, 2: 655-660. 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90028-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Breaker RR, Joyce GF: A DNA enzyme that cleaves RNA. Chem Biol. 1994, 1: 223-229. 10.1016/1074-5521(94)90014-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Breaker RR: DNA enzymes. Nat Biotechnol. 1997, 15: 427-431. 10.1038/nbt0597-427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Blum H, Beier H, Gross H: Improved silver staining of plant-proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis. 1987, 8: 93-99. 10.1002/elps.1150080203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2

    Google Scholar 

  46. Girish V, Vijayalakshmi A: Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ImageJ. Indian J Cancer. 2004, 41: 47-

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rinehart J, Krett B, Rubio MA, Alfonzo JD, Soll D: Saccharomyces cerevisiae imports the cytosolic pathway for Gln-tRNA synthesis into the mitochondrion. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 583-592. 10.1101/gad.1269305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Antony T, Thomas T, Shirahata A, Thomas TJ: Selectivity of polyamines on the stability of RNA-DNA hybrids containing phosphodiester and phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 10775-10784. 10.1021/bi990180t.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Thomas T, Thomas TJ: Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001, 58: 244-258. 10.1007/PL00000852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Venkiteswaran S, Vijayanathan V, Shirahata A, Thomas T, Thomas TJ: Antisense recognition of the HER-2 mRNA: effects of phosphorothioate substitution and polyamines on DNA.RNA, RNA.RNA, and DNA.DNA duplex stability. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 303-312. 10.1021/bi0485272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Xaplanteri MA, Petropoulos AD, Dinos GP, Kalpaxis DL: Localization of spermine binding sites in 23S rRNA by photoaffinity labeling: parsing the spermine contribution to ribosomal 50S subunit functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 2792-2805. 10.1093/nar/gki557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bonaccio M, Credali A, Peracchi A: Kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of the RNA-cleaving 8-17 deoxyribozyme. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 916-925. 10.1093/nar/gkh250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cruz RP, Withers JB, Li Y: Dinucleotide junction cleavage versatility of 8-17 deoxyribozyme. Chem Biol. 2004, 11: 57-67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu Z, Mei SH, Brennan JD, Li Y: Assemblage of signaling DNA enzymes with intriguing metal-ion specificities and pH dependences. J Am Chem Soc. 2003, 125: 7539-7545. 10.1021/ja035208+.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schlosser K, Gu J, Lam JC, Li Y: In vitro selection of small RNA-cleaving deoxyribozymes that cleave pyrimidine-pyrimidine junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: 4768-4777. 10.1093/nar/gkn396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang X, Potty AS, Jackson GW, Stepanov V, Tang A, Liu Y, Kourentzi K, Strych U, Fox GE, Willson RC: Engineered 5S ribosomal RNAs displaying aptamers recognizing vascular endothelial growth factor and malachite green. J Mol Recognit. 2009, 22: 154-161. 10.1002/jmr.917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987, 162: 156-159. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat Protocols. 2006, 1: 581-585. 10.1038/nprot.2006.83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded in part by grants to GEF from the Georgia Institute of Technology Center for Ribosomal Evolution and Adaptation and the Center for Bionanotechnology and Environmental Research at Texas Southern University (NASA Cooperative Agreement NNX08B4A47A), to RCW from the Robert A. Welch Foundation (E-1264) and the STTR programs of the National Science Foundation (0738336) and National Institutes of Health (1R41ES016478-01) to GWJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to George E Fox.

Additional information

Competing interests

GEF, VGS, GWJ, and YL have one or more pending patent applications on the described technology. This intellectual property has been licensed to BioTex, Inc.

Authors' contributions

GEF, VGS and GWJ conceived the study. YL and VGS designed and performed the experiments. US, RCW, and GWJ participated in data analysis. All authors contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Stepanov, V.G., Strych, U. et al. DNAzyme-mediated recovery of small recombinant RNAs from a 5S rRNA-derived chimera expressed in Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnol 10, 85 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Small RNAs
  • Cleavage Reaction
  • Longe Incubation Time
  • Affinity Capture
  • Streptavidin Agarose Bead