Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

Research article
Open Access

Development of an EGFRvIII specific recombinant antibody

  • Puja Gupta1,
  • Shuang-Yin Han1, 2,
  • Marina Holgado-Madruga1,
  • Siddhartha S Mitra1,
  • Gordon Li1,
  • Ryan T Nitta1 and
  • Albert J Wong1Email author
BMC Biotechnology201010:72

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-10-72

©  Gupta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

Received: 9 June 2010

Accepted: 7 October 2010

Published: 7 October 2010

Abstract

Background

EGF receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is the most common variant of the EGF receptor observed in human tumors. It results from the in frame deletion of exons 2-7 and the generation of a novel glycine residue at the junction of exons 1 and 8. This novel juxtaposition of amino acids within the extra-cellular domain of the EGF receptor creates a tumor specific and immunogenic epitope. EGFRvIII expression has been seen in many tumor types including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), breast adenocarcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, ovarian adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer, but has been rarely observed in normal tissue. Because this variant is tumor specific and highly immunogenic, it can be used for both a diagnostic marker as well as a target for immunotherapy. Unfortunately many of the monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies directed against EGFRvIII have cross reactivity to wild type EGFR or other non-specific proteins. Furthermore, a monoclonal antibody to EGFRvIII is not readily available to the scientific community.

Results

In this study, we have developed a recombinant antibody that is specific for EGFRvIII, has little cross reactivity for the wild type receptor, and which can be easily produced. We initially designed a recombinant antibody with two anti-EGFRvIII single chain Fv's linked together and a human IgG1 Fc component. To enhance the specificity of this antibody for EGFRvIII, we mutated tyrosine H59 of the CDRH2 domain and tyrosine H105 of the CDRH3 domain to phenylalanine for both the anti-EGFRvIII sequence inserts. This mutated recombinant antibody, called RAbDMvIII, specifically detects EGFRvIII expression in EGFRvIII expressing cell lines as well as in EGFRvIII expressing GBM primary tissue by western blot, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) and FACS analysis. It does not recognize wild type EGFR in any of these assays. The affinity of this antibody for EGFRvIII peptide is 1.7 × 107 M-1 as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Conclusion

This recombinant antibody thus holds great potential to be used as a research reagent and diagnostic tool in research laboratories and clinics because of its high quality, easy viability and unique versatility. This antibody is also a strong candidate to be investigated for further in vivo therapeutic studies.

Keywords

A431 CellRecombinant AntibodyBioCare MedicalEGFRvIII ExpressionA431 Cell Lysate

Background

According to Global Health Council despite advances in the understanding of cancer biology, malignant neoplasms remain the second leading cause of mortality in United States. Novel therapies are needed and over the past two decades new immunotherapy strategies have emerged as a promising approach. The success of these immunotherapeutic strategies is highly dependent on finding an ideal antigen to target. One such target is the EGF receptor which is over or aberrantly expressed in a variety of human cancers [1–12]. However, the fact that the EGF receptor is present on normal tissue could lead to possible deleterious side effects or immune tolerance when treating patients with reagents solely targeting the EGF receptor. A tumor specific antigen would be more ideal. Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is the most common variant of the EGF receptor and is expressed in a number of solid tumors including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), breast adenocarcinoma, medulloblastoma and ovarian adenocarcinoma, but has only rarely been observed in normal tissue [13–15]. This variant receptor results from an in-frame deletion of exons 2-7 of the wild type EGF receptor. This causes a deletion of a large portion of the extracellular domain and the generation of a novel glycine at the fusion junction between exon 1 and exon 8 [16–18]. EGFRvIII is ligand independent yet constitutively active and when expressed in cells it leads to unregulated growth, survival, invasion, and angiogenesis [19]. EGFRvIII is an ideal target for immunotherapy because the juxtaposition of exon 1 and 8 sequences plus the novel glycine creates a highly immunogenic tumor specific antigen, and the receptor itself leads to a cancer phenotype due to its constitutive activity [1, 20–22].

There are a number of immune approaches that specifically target EGFRvIII. For example, a peptide vaccine targeting this mutant receptor is currently being tested in clinical trials for GBM patients [23, 24]. Another approach is the development of antibodies that recognize EGFRvIII which can be used for diagnostic/laboratory purposes or for therapeutic purposes either alone or attached to a cytotoxic or radiolabeled adjunct [25, 26]. Many of the monoclonal antibodies that target EGFRvIII, however, have cross reactivity with the wild type EGF receptor or other non-specific proteins [27] or comparatively have low affinity. While polyclonal antibodies are apparently highly sensitive and of high affinity, it is difficult to produce them in mass quantities. An additional complicating factor is that the rights to the antibody for EGFRvIII are patented and have not been made widely available for either scientific or medical use.

To generate a highly specific and cost effective antibody that could be used for scientific and clinical purposes, we developed a recombinant antibody. Recombinant antibody technology has gained popularity in recent years because of its many advantages when compared with the production of monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. First, no animals are needed and the manufacturing time is relatively short compared with conventional methods. Moreover, the quality and quantity of the final product is superior when compared to conventional antibody production. Recombinant antibodies are formed by combining single-chain Fv antibodies, consisting of VH and VL chains, by a flexible linker [28]. In this report, we describe how we created a recombinant antibody that specifically recognizes EGFRvIII and demonstrate its specificity by western blot analysis, immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry analysis (FACS). This easily produced and highly specific recombinant antibody holds great potential to be used as a diagnostic and a therapeutic tool.

Results

Western Analysis

We constructed the first recombinant EGFRvIII antibody, RAbvIII, using the sequence of MR1-1, an scFv developed against EGFRvIII (Figure 1) [29]. To determine the specificity of RAbvIII antibody for EGFRvIII, we used it for western blot analysis. Consistent with previously published data, the RAbvIII antibody recognizes the 145 kDa EGFRvIII protein band in U87-vIII cells stably expressing EGFRvIII (U87-vIII) compared to the U87-MG untransfected cells (Figure 2A) [30]. The RAbvIII antibody also faintly recognized the endogenous 170 kDa wild type EGF receptor and it strongly recognize a 45 kDa protein band in both U87-vIII and U87-MG control cells. We speculated that the 45 kDa protein was cross-reaction with another EGF receptor variant that we have recently identified, called mLEEK. MiniLEEK (mLEEK) is the result of the fusion of exon 1 to exon 23 and is predicted to be 45 kDa in size (Piccione et al., submitted). This also creates a glycine at the junction and the fusion junction (LEEKKGVTVWEL) bears some resemblance to the EGFRvIII sequence.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic of the RAb DMvIII antibody. The genes for the anti-EGFRvIII scFvs were cloned into the pBudCE4.1 dicistronic vector. The Ig k-chain signal sequence at the 5' end of each sequence allowed the secretion of the molecule in the culture media. "Knobs-into-holes" configuration and the two cysteine residues at the 3' end of each CH3 domain stabilize the construct. Sequence corresponding to a V5 epitope was cloned at the 3' end of one anti-EGFR scFvs and the other anti-EGFR scFv has Myc as well as a 6xHis tag at 3'end.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Western Blot analysis of RAb DMvIII antibody. A) 30 ug of U87vIII and U87 wild type cell lysate loaded under reducing conditions on 4-20% SDS-PAGE. A) RAbvIII recognizes 145 kDa band which corresponds to the EGFRvIII and 45 kDa unspecific protein band. A) RAbDMvIII recognizes only 145 kDa protein band. B) RAbDMvIII recognizes 170 KDa protein band in 30 ug of A431 cell lysate (cells overexpressing EGFR) and 145 kDa band in 30 ug of HC2 cell lysate under reducing conditions. B) EGFR antibody recognizes equal amount of protein in both HC2 and A431 cell lysate under reducing conditions. C) RAbDMvIII under non reducing conditions detect only 145 kDa protein band whereas RAbvIII still recognizes 145 kDa and 170 kDa protein bands in non reducing conditions. C) Actin antibody under reducing condition shows equal amount of protein loaded in the wells.

The crystal structure of MR1-1 in complex with the EGFRvIII peptide has been done by Landry et al.[31] This shows the valine at P9 position of the EGFRvIII peptide forms a hydrogen bond with tyrosine at H59 and H105 on MR1-1. The mLEEK peptide has a valine at the identical position. Since RAbvIII potentially cross reacted with mLEEK, to eliminate the non-specific 45 kDa band we mutated the tyrosines at H59 and H105 to phenylalanine.

To determine if the mutated RAbDMvIII has improved specificity towards EGFRvIII, we conducted another western analysis. We found that RAbDMvIII now specifically recognizes only the EGFRvIII 145 kDa protein band and not the EGFR variant 45 kDa band (Figure 2A). We also more rigorously tested cross-reaction with wt EGF receptor by performing Western blots using lysates from A431 cells, which express 1 × 106 receptors per cell. When we studied the specificity of RAbDMvIII towards the overexpressed wild type EGFR present in A431 cells we discovered that the RAbDMvIII antibody did cross-react with the 170 kDa wild type protein (Figure 2B).

Consequently, to further study the specificity of the RAbDMvIII under these conditions we expanded our analysis to include HC2 cells which expresses EGFRvIII at a level comparable to that of EGFR expressed by A431 (Figure 2B). Western analysis using anti-EGFR antibody E3138 from Sigma shows that there are similar amounts of wild type EGFR and EGFRvIII protein expressed in A431 and HC2 cells (Figure 2B).

Based on the study done by Johns et al. which showed that monoclonal antibody 806 recognizes overexpressed EGFR in A431 cells only under reducing conditions, we further analyzed both HC2 and A431 cell lysates under non-reducing western conditions [32]. Western analysis under these conditions shows that recombinant RAbDMvIII recognizes only the EGFRvIII 145 kDa band and not the wild type EGFR 170 kDa band (Figure 2C) suggesting that under reducing conditions the EGFR epitope is somewhat more exposed and accessible to RAbDMvIII [32]. On the other hand, the non mutated RAbvIII consistently recognizes the 170 kDa wild type EGFR band even under non-reducing western conditions clearly illustrating that RAbDMvIII is a more specific EGFRvIII antibody than RAbvIII.

Antibody Affinity

To determine the affinity constant of the antibody, we used the method described by Friguet et al. (1984) [33]. It is necessary that the concentration of the antibody used in the ELISA should be equal to or less than the value of dissociation constant of the antibody. Thus a preliminary ELISA was performed to deduce the dissociation constant of the antibody. From the preliminary ELISA, the dissociation constant of RAbvIII and RAbDMvIII is calculated to be approximately 1.7 μM and 886 nM, respectively, against EGFRvIII peptide (Figure 3A). This result suggests that RAbDMvIII did not lose its affinity after mutation as RAbDMvIII has a lower dissociation constant than RAbvIII.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Affinity determination of RAb DMvIII by Saturation ELISA. Calibration curve of the binding of RAbDMvIII and RAbvIII recombinant antibodies to coated EGFRvIII in the ELISA. A) The concentration range for RAbDMvIII and RAbvIII was 20 to 0.02 ug/ml (x axis) and the absorbance was read at 450 nm (Y axis). The assay was analyzed twice. B) Saturation ELISA shows the Scatchard plot of the binding of RAbDMvIII to EGFRvIII. The resulting data is plotted as ratio of α/c (y axis) as function of alpha (x axis) where α is the fraction of bound antibody sites and c is the concentration of free antigen. The slope is -K which is the affinity constant of antibody and that is 1.7 × 107 liters/mole (M-1).

The indirect ELISA was performed with RAbDMvIII using a concentration of 117 nM, which is lower than its dissociation constant value of 886 nM. The OD values from this ELISA were placed in a Scatchard plot equation where the fraction of bound antibody sites α (determined from the OD values) is plotted on the X axis and the ratio of the fraction of bound antibody sites α to free antigen sites c, (α/c) is plotted on the Y axis. The slope gives the value of -K, the affinity constant of the antibody, which is 1.7 × 107 M-1 (Figure 3B).

Immunoprecipitation

Immunoprecipitation of HC2 and A431 cell lysates was performed using RAbDMvIII and G100 an anti-EGFRvIII monoclonal antibody (no longer commercially available). As a negative recombinant antibody control for EGFR wt and EGFRvIII, we also used RAbCD133, which utilizes the same expression vector as RAbDMvIII but is directed against CD133 and recognizes neither EGFR wt nor EGFRvIII. HC2 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with RAbDMvIII and G100 antibody and then further immunoblotted with E3138 antibody showed the expected 145 kDa band corresponding to EGFRvIII in the pellet whereas RAbCD133 did not show the 145 kDa band in the pellet as it does not bind to EGFRvIII (Figure 4A) On the contrary, when A431 cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with either RAbDMvIII, G100 or RAbCD133 and then immunoblotted with the E3138 antibody, the170 kDa bands corresponding to wt EGFR was found in the supernatant (Figure 4B). This suggested that even when abundant amounts of wt EGFR protein is present RAbDMvIII did not bind to any wild type EGFR.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Immunoprecipitation of EGFRvIII by RAb DMvIII . Immunoprecipitation was performed with RAbDMvIII, Monoclonal EGFRvIII antibody and RAbCD133 (negative control for our recombinant antibody) on HC2 and A431 cell lysates. A) HC2 lysates immunoprecipitated by Monoclonal EGFRvIII antibody, RAbDMvIII showed 145 kda band corresponding to EGFRvIII in the pellet whereas 145 kda band is seen in the sup of RAbCD133 when immunoblotted with E3138 antibody from sigma. B) On the other hand A431 cell lysate showed 170 kda protein band corresponding to EGFR in the supernatant of Monoclonal EGFRvIII antibody, RAbDMvII1 and RAbCD133samples.

Immunofluorescence

Since the specificity of RAbDMvIII is greatly enhanced under native conditions, we decided to test the recombinant antibody specificity under in vivo conditions. To this end, indirect immunofluorescence was performed on HC2 and A431 cells with RAbDMvIII at a concentration of 0.25 μg/μl. Images were taken using a Leica SP2 AOBS confocal microscope. Consistent with previous findings, the RAbDMvIII shows that the EGFRvIII protein is both membrane bound and has an intracellular localization (Figure 5A) [1, 6, 34]. To verify the specificity of the RAbDMvIII antibody we conducted a peptide competition using the EGFRvIII epitope (LEEKKGNYVVTDHC). The presence of the EGFRvIII epitope completely blocked RAbDMvIII from interacting with the EGFRvIII found in the HC2 cells (Figure 5C), as compared to the scramble epitope control which showed no decrease in detection of EGFRvIII (Figure 5B). Additionally, the A431 cells that over express wild type EGFR did not demonstrate any signal with RAbDMvIII (Figure 5D), whereas the anti-EGFR antibody recognizes a strong EGFR wild type signal demonstrating that the A431cells retain high expression of the wild type protein (Figure 5E). Together these findings indicate again that this recombinant antibody is highly specific towards EGFRvIII.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Detection of specificity of RAb DMvIII by Immunofluorescence. A) Immunofluorescence study shows that RAbDMvIII detects EGFRvIII protein in HC2 cells, B) Scrambled peptide competition shows detection of the EGFRvIII signal in HC2 cells by RAbDMvIII, C) Specific peptide (EGFRvIII) competition dampens the signal in HC2 cells, D) No signal is detected in A431 cells by RAbDMvIII, E) EGFR signal is detected in A431 cells by anti-EGFR antibody (sc-130, Santa Cruz).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is another sensitive biochemical test to monitor for the expression of EGFRvIII. To determine if the RAbDMvIII antibody could be used for IHC, we used mouse tumor xenografts from HC2 and A431 cells (Figure 6A-C) and GBM cases (Figure 6D-G). The tumor xenografts contain both HC2 tissue (top) and A431 tissue (bottom). RAbDMvIII shows strong positivity to the HC2 section which is comparable in intensity to slides stained with the positive control anti-EGFRvIII polyclonal antibody (Figure 6A &6B). In addition, the RAbDMvIII antibody did not stain the A431 tissue sections (Figure 6A). The recombinant antibody RAbCD133 was used as a negative antibody control (Figure 6C). We extended our findings to two GBM cases, one positive for EGFRvIII (08023) and one negative (04-34497). Consistent with the mouse tumor xenografts, the RAbDMvIII antibody only stained the GBM positive for EGFRvIII and had no cross reactivity to the negative GBM case (Figure 6D &6F). As a control, we also stained these sections with affinity purified polyclonal anti-EGFRvIII and observed similar results (Figure 6E and 6G).
Figure 6
Figure 6

Detection of EGFRvIII by RAb DMvIII Immunohistochemistry. (A-C) Immunohistochemical staining of U87vIII & A431 mouse tumor xenografts and (D-G) Glioblastoma section. A) Staining of A431 and U87vIII with polyclonal EGFRvIII antibody. B) RAbDMvIII antibody staining, C) RAbCD133antibody staining. D) Glioblastoma 08-023 staining with RAbDMvIII. E) Glioblastoma 08-023 staining with polyclonal EGFRvIII ab. F) Glioblastoma 04-34497 stained with polyclonal EGFRvIII antibody and G) RAbDMvIII staining of 04-34497.

Flow cytometry

Because RAbDMvIII efficiently detects surface EGFRvIII, we asked if it might be an effective reagent for flow cytometry experiments. Under native conditions we observed that RAbDMvIII binds to surface expressed EGFRvIII very efficiently. Figure 7A shows an overlay of plots from HC2 cells stained with increasing concentration of RAbDMvIII (0.1 μg, 1 μg and 2 μg per 106 cells). The dot blot and histogram in blue represents human-IgG1 isotype control and as low as 0.1 ug of RAbDMvIII shows a significant shift in fluorescence intensity. Higher concentration of RAbDMvIII (1 μg and 2 μg) show the presence of multiple peaks consistent with the immunofluorescence assay (Figure 5) which shows different levels of EGFRvIII expression. To look at the sensitivity of RAbDMvIII in identifying and isolating EGFRvIII expressing cells, we mixed NIH3T3 and HC2 cells at a 1:1 stoichiometry prior to staining with RAbDMvIII. RAbDMvIII was able to clearly identify and separate the HC2 cells from NIH3T3 cells.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Specificity of RAb DMvII1 by Flow cytometry. Flow cytometric analysis of surface expressed EGFRvIII. A) 1 × 106 cells HC2 cells were stained with increasing concentration of RAbDMvIII: 0.1 μg (purple), 1 μg (red) and 2 μg (green). The dot blot (left panel) and histogram in blue represents human-IgG1 isotype control. B) NIH3T3 and HC2 cells were mixed in a 1:1 ratio prior to staining with RAbDMvIII revealing distinct identification of an EGFRvIII cell population. C) Overlay of flow cytometric plots of A431 (black) cells and HC2 cells (blue) stained with RAbDMvIII, showing clear selectivity for EGFRvIII expression over EGFR expression. D) Freshly dissociated human GBM tumor stained with RAbDMvIII shows the presence of surface EGFRvIII on 13% of cells (right panel). The dot blot (left panel) represents human-IgG1 isotype control.

One of the earlier concerns in developing the recombinant EGFRvIII antibodies was the potential cross-reactivity towards wt EGFR under conditions where the receptor is over-expressed such as that in A431 cells. Flow cytometry allows quantitation of any potential cross-reaction under native conditions. Figure 7C is the overlap of plots of A431 (black) and HC2 (blue) cells with RAbDMvIII. There is very little reactivity of RAbDMvIII with A431 as compared to HC2 cells demonstrating that this reagent does not cross-react with wt EGFR. We further tested RAbDMvIII for surface staining of freshly primary tumor cells and observed about 14% of cells to be EGFRvIII positive over the isotype control.

Discussion

In this work, we have constructed a novel recombinant antibody, RAbDMvIII, which specifically recognizes EGFRvIII. Based upon a previously described scFv against EGFRvIII, we have performed further mutagenesis to eliminate cross reaction with a 50 kDa band. We have demonstrated the specificity of this antibody for EGFRvIII and not wt EGFR or any other protein by several methods. Unlike other monoclonal anti-EGFRvIII antibodies, this antibody is broadly useful because it recognizes the EGFRvIII epitope in several assays including ELISA, IF, IHC, western blot analysis, and flow cytometry.

A distinct advantage is that recombinantly produced antibodies require no animal for production but otherwise have the properties of conventional antibodies but with additional, improved properties. Indeed, the RAbDMvIII has been engineered to have an IgG Fc region, which confers long serum half life, and has selected to support secondary immune functions, such as antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) [35, 36]. Studies have demonstrated that Fc-containing BsAb and other fusion proteins do retain the full effector mechanisms of the Fc component [36, 37].

Effective tumor targeting requires that the antibody should have an affinity for its tumor antigen but extremely high affinity may in fact be detrimental [38]. Previous studies have shown that very high affinity interactions of 109 M-1 between antibodies and tumor antigens may actually impair efficient tumor penetration of the monoclonal antibodies and thus diminish effective in vivo targeting [39]. Fujimori et al. [40] and Van Osdol et al. [41] have also demonstrated that higher affinity monoclonal antibodies do not homogenously distribute and show less killing of the target cancer cells. According to Robinson et al., a high antibody affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of Fv antibody molecules [42]. In another study, Langmuir et al. [26] have shown that a lower affinity mAb of 5.2 × 10 7 M-1 was nearly as toxic as a mAb with an affinity of 1.9 × 109 M-1. Our antibody has an affinity of 1.7 × 107 M-1 as shown by saturation ELISA so it could be a reasonable candidate for therapeutic studies.

In separate studies, we have already begun to explore the effectiveness of the RAbDMvIII in targeting tumor spheres derived from glioblastoma tumors. These experiments have already shown that this reagent specifically lyse the cells expressing EGFRvIII and spare normal neural stem cells (Mitra et al., submitted). We performed cytotoxicity assays using a coupled luminescence method on various EGFRvIII transfected cell lines with human NK cells as effectors and found that this reagent significantly induces cell killing of EGFRvIII transfected cells. RAb DMvIII also remarkably reduces the sphere initiating frequency on GBM cells but not in normal cells as it has been shown that EGFRvIII is required for the maintenance of glioma growth in vivo [43]. To further investigate this reagent in mouse models, two GBM sphere lines were incubated with either RAbDMvIII, RAbCD133 or a non-specific human control antibody and orthotopically injected into the cortex of NOD-SCID mice. Tumor formation was analyzed after 26 weeks which revealed a higher incidence of human tumor cells engraftment with RAbCD133 and Hu-IgG1 as compared to RAbDMvIII (Mitra et al., submitted). In order to provide this reagent to other researchers and for future studies, we are planning to scale up antibody production using hollow fiber bioreactor system. Hence this antibody could be of great significance in the field of brain tumor research.

Conclusion

Despite significant advances in the field of neuro-oncology and immunology, there is no widely available EGFRvIII antibody for scientific or clinical use. Furthermore, there is no EGFRvIII antibody clinically proven to be used on patients because of cross reactions and other high risk allergic reactions due to murine Fc portion of the monoclonal antibodies. RAbDMvIII has shown high specificity towards EGFRvIII and thus holds great potential to be further investigated for therapeutic purposes.

Methods

Cell Culture

U87-MG, HEK293, A431, and HC2 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). U87-MGvIII, a human glioma cell line stably transfected with EGFRvIII, was generously donated by Dr Donald O'Rourke. Cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (glucose at 4.5 g/L) supplemented with either 10% fetal bovine serum or calf serum as per cell line requirement, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 μg/ml kanamycin sulfate. The U87-MGvIII cell lines were maintained in Geneticin (G418) selection at 500 μg/mL.

Tumor Sections for Immunohistochemistry

NOD-SCID mice were injected subcutaneously with either 1 × 106 U87-MGvIII or A431 cells in the right hind flank of athymic mice. After fourteen days, the mice were sacrificed and the flank tumors were dissected out and fixed in 10% formalin. Four micron tissue sections of both A431 and U87-MGvIII tumors were cut and mounted on the same slide. Cut and mounted primary human glioblastoma tumor sections were obtained from Stanford University brain bank under IRB approved protocols.

Plasmid Construction and Cloning

The pBudCE4:Her2/neu:CD16 bispecific minibody was a kind gift from Dr. Louis Weiner [44]. This construct has an IgG1 CH3 constant domain linked to one single chain variable fragment (scFv) against Her2/neu and one scFv against CD16 in a di-body format on the pBudCE4 vector backbone. The Her2/neu and CD16 variable fragments were replaced with MR1-1 [21] as described below. MR1-1 is a scFv against EGFRvIII selected from a phage display library which was derived from MR1 (scFv), an antibody Fv fragment that recognizes an epitope within the EGFRvIII-specific sequence. The MR1-1 scFv was artificially synthesized based on sequence available from Genbank (accession no. U76382).

The plasmid construct pBudCE4:Her2/neu: CD16 was digested with Not I and Bgl II to remove the Her2/neu scFv. The artificially synthesized MR1-1 was amplified using primers AAGGAAAAAAGCGGCCGCACCATGGAGACAGACACACTCCTGCTATGGGTACTGCTGCTCTGGGTTCCA

GGTTCCACTGGTGGTGACGACTACAAGGACGACGATGACAAGCAGGTGAAACTGCAGCAGTCT (scFvEGFRvIII-Not1-ATG/Igk (F)) and GGAAGATCTACCGCCACTGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCACTCGAGCCACCTTTGATTTCCAGCTTGGTGC (scFvEGFRvIII-Linker/BglII(R)) and ligated into the scFv Her2/neu position. The resulting recombinant antibody was then digested with Sfil and Xba1 to remove the scFv for CD16. Primers ACATTGGTGCCGAAACCTATTCACTGCTTACTCGCGGCCCAGCCGGCCCAGGTGAAACTGCAGCAGTCT (scFvLEEK-Sfil(F)) and GCTCTAGAACCGCCACTGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCACTCGAGCCACCTTTGATTTCCAGCTTGGTGC (scFvLEEK-XbI/linker(R)) were used to amplify the second EGFRvIII scFv and ligated into the scFv CD16 position. The plasmid pBudCE4(scfvEGFRvIII) has the CH3 gene with "knobs-into-holes" configuration [45]. Additionally the V5 epitope and His6 tag sequences are cloned at the 3'-end of one anti-EGFRvIII binding arm, whereas the MYC epitope and His6 tag sequences were cloned at the 3'-end of another anti-EGFRvIII binding arm (Figure 1). A construct with two scFvs against CD133 was created in a similar fashion as a control.

Site Directed Mutagenesis

Site directed mutagenesis was used to change tyrosine H59 of the CDRH2 domain and tyrosine H105 of the CDRH3 domain to phenylalanine for both the anti EGFRvIII scFv sequence inserts (200519-5, Stratagene). Primer CTATTCTCCTTACTCTTTTGCTATGGACTACTGGG (F) and primer CCCAGTAGTCCATAGCAAAAGAGTAAGGAGAATAG (R) were used for the H105 mutation while primer ACTGGCGGTTATAATACCTTCTATTCAGACAATGTAAAG (F) and primer CTTTACATTGTCTGAATAGAAGGTATTATAACCGCCAGT (R) were used for the H59 mutation. The resulting mutated vector is called pBudCE4(DMscfvEGFRvIII) and the antibody produced by this construct is called RAbDMvIII whereas the antibody produced by pBudCE4(scfvEGFRvIII) and pBudCE4(scfvCD133) are called RAbvIII and RAbCD133 respectively.

Transfection, Collection and Purification of Antibody

The pBudCE4scfvEGFRvIII, pBudCE4scfvCD133 and pBudCE4DMscfvEGFRvIII plasmids were stably transfected into HEK293 cells using calcium phosphate, and the positive clones were selected using zeocin at 400 μg/ml. Media was collected from the stably transfected cells and the His-tagged antibodies were isolated and purified using Ni-NTA agarose (R901-15, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The antibodies were eluted using 500 mM imidazole. The fractions containing the antibodies were identified through Coomassie staining of SDS PAGE. The fractions containing the antibody protein were combined and dialyzed against phosphate buffer solution (PBS). The protein concentration was determined by a Bio-Rad Dc protein assay.

Western Blot Analysis

Confluent HC2 and A431 cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed using a buffer containing 10 mM Na2HPO4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.2% sodium azide, 0.004% sodium fluoride, 1 mM NaVO4, 25 mM β-glycerophosphoric acid, 100 μg of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride/ml, 10 μg of aprotinin/ml, and 10 μg of leupeptin/ml (pH 7.35). Cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to clear out cell debris, and protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad DC protein assay. For gel electrophoresis under non-reducing conditions, forty micrograms of cell lysate was prepared in 6x Laemmli Sample Buffer lacking β-mercaptoethanol and the samples were not boiled. The proteins were resolved on 4-20% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for immunoblot analysis. The membranes were blocked with blocking buffer 5% Blotto (100 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 with 5% nonfat dry milk) and incubated with the following antibodies: RAbvIII, RAbDMvIII, mouse anti-actin (MAB1501R, Chemicon), and mouse anti-EGFR (E3138, Sigma Aldrich). Horse radish peroxidase (HRP) affinity pure Donkey anti-Human IgG (709-035-149, Jackson Immunoresearch) was used as the secondary for the recombinant antibodies. Proteins were detected with ECL reagents (#RPN2106V1 and #RPN2106V2, GE Health care).

Immunoprecipitation

HC2 (EGFRvIII transfected) and A431 (EGFR wt transfected) cell lysates were isolated as described in the western blot section and 300 μl of lysate was incubated with 12 μg of G100 antibody (formerly commercially available from Zymed lab, now discontinued), RAbCD133 and RAbDMvIII for 1 hr at 4°C. Forty μls of washed 50% slurry of protein Gammabind G Sepharose (17-0885-01, GE Healthcare) was added to each lysate/antibody mix and incubated overnight at 4C. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with the same lysis buffer and resuspended in sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol. Immunocomplexes were resolved on 4-20% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE gels under normal reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblot analysis by mouse anti-EGFR antibody (E3138, Sigma Aldrich).

Immunofluorescence

HC2 and A431 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X, and blocked with 5% goat serum (0060-01, Southern Biotech). The following antibodies were used for IF: RAbDMvIII, mouse anti-EGFR (EGFR (528): sc-120, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). FITC goat anti-human (A11013, Jackson Immunoresearch) and FITC goat anti-mouse (A11029, Jackson Immunoresearch) were used as secondary antibodies. Images were obtained using a Leica SP2 AOBS Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope. For peptide competition, ~20 times higher molar concentration of EGFRvIII peptide (LEEKKGNYVVTDH-C, Genscript) and scrambled peptide (WELKVNGTKDEYH-C, Genscript) was incubated with the primary antibody at 37°C for 1 hour and the mixture was centrifuged at 14000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was used at the primary antibody incubation step of immunofluorescence protocol.

Immunohistochemistry

Slides were deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated in decreasing percentages of ethanol. 3% hydrogen peroxide was used to block endogenous peroxidase and the slides were placed in Diva Decloaker (BioCare Medical) and microwaved for 13 minutes 10 seconds for antigen retrieval. After a cooling down period, the slides were treated with Sniper Universal serum (BioCare Medical) and then incubated with the following antibodies at 0.5 μg/ml overnight at 4°C: Rabbit anti-EGFR antibody, RAbCD133 (recombinant negative control) and RAbDMvIII. Each slide was then incubated with the appropriate secondary and/or tertiary antibody. The secondary antibodies used were: HRP-Anti Rabbit (BioCare Medical), anti-Human IgG rabbit (I9135, Sigma), HRP anti-rabbit antibody (BioCare Medical). Protein expression was detected by betazoid DAB (BioCare Medical). The slides were also counterstained with hematoxylin. Glioblastoma slides were analyzed in a similar fashion to the A431 and U87-MGvIII slides except that the slides for RAbDMvIII were blocked with equal volume of background sniper (BioCare Medical), 5% Blotto and normal human serum (31876, Fisher) and the secondary antibody for RAbDMvIII was rabbit anti-V5 (A00623, Genscript) followed by the tertiary antibody, which was HRP-anti-rabbit (BioCare medical).

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

To determine the affinity constant of the RAbDMvIII a preliminary ELISA was performed to find the concentration of the antibody. This preliminary ELISA was performed with both RAbDMvIII and RAbvIII antibodies to compare the dissociation constant of both the antibodies. A dilution series of antibodies RAbDMvIII and RAbvIII (20 μg/ml-0.01952 μg/ml) in 5% blotto was used. ELISA plates were first coated with 10 μg/ml of EGFRvIII peptide in coating solution in duplicate for each antibody overnight at 4C. The next day the plates were washed with 1× wash buffer (50-63-00, KpL) and 5% blotto was added for 1 hr at RT. Thereafter the respective plates were incubated with different dilutions of RAbDMvIII and RAbvIII ranging from 20 μg/ml to 0.02 μg/ml in 5% blotto for 1 hr at RT. The plates were washed 3 × 10 min each with 1× wash buffer, and then affinity pure Donkey anti-Human IgG (709-035-149, Jackson Immunoresearch) was applied at a 1: 5000 dilution in 5% Blotto for 1 hr at RT, and then the plates were washed 3 × 10 min each. 100 μl of 1× developing reagent was added to each reaction well, and after 10 min., 100 μl of stop solution 1N HCl was added and the absorbance was read at 450 nm. All curves reached a maximum value, which indicated that the reactions proceeded until saturation. The data was plotted as the absorbance at 450 nm versus different antibody concentrations. This gave an equilibrium dissociation constant, Kd, for RAbDMvIII of 886 nM and for RAbvIII of 1.7 μM.

Determination of Affinity Constant

Indirect ELISA was performed to determine the affinity constant of the recombinant antibody. This method developed by Friguet et al [33] uses a solid-phase assay for measuring the amount of free antibody present at equilibrium in an antigen-antibody reaction mixture. Since the RAbDMvIII has a lower dissociation constant than RAbvIII as shown by preliminary ELISA we decided to perform indirect ELISA with RAbDMvIII only.

Two ninety-six well ELISA plates (353279, BD Falcon) were coated overnight at 4°C with EGFRvIII peptide LEEKKGNYVVTDH-C at a decreasing concentration from 40 ug/ml to 2.5 μg/ml in coating solution (50-84-00, KpL). Wells were then blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 hr at room temperature. In parallel tubes, antibody at 234 nM is incubated with double the concentration of antigen used in the plates that is (80 μg/ml-5 μg/ml) in equal volume for final concentration of antibody to be 117 nM (less than the dissociation constant of RAbDMvIII ) and final antigen concentration of (40 μg/ml-2.5 μg/ml) for 30 min at RT, and then the antibody-antigen mixture is transferred to the wells of the first antigen coated microtiter plate and incubated for 15 min. After this incubation, the contents are then transferred to the second antigen coated plate and incubated for another 15 min. The plates were washed with wash buffer (50-63-00, KpL) and secondary donkey anti-Human antibody from Jackson ImmunoResearch was added for 1 hr incubation at RT. After further washes of 3 × 10 min each, 100 μl of substrate (53-00-02, KpL) is applied and 100 μl of stop solution (1 N HCl) is added after 10 min. The absorbance was read at 450 nm in an ELISA plate reader. The data is plotted as the fraction of bound antibody sites versus the ratio of (fraction of bound antibody/concentration of free antigen). The slope gives the value of K, which is the affinity constant.

Flowcytometry

Flowcytometric analysis was performed using RAbDMvIII for native cell surface expressed EGFRvIII. U87-MGwt, U87-MGvIII, A431, and HC2 cell lines were dissociated using TryplE® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were resuspended in flow cytometry buffer, consisting of 1× HBSS, pH 7.2, containing 1.55 g/l glucose and 0.1% fraction V of bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,). Cells were counted and diluted to a density of 106 cells per milliliter of buffer. 1 μg of RAbDMvIII was used per 106 cells unless otherwise specified. Cells were analyzed on a BD LSR-I flowcytometer (BD Biosciences). Unlabeled cells and cells labeled with isotype control (human IgG1) were used to set gating parameters between positive and negative cell populations. Cell aggregates and small debris were excluded from analysis or isolation on the basis of side scatter (measuring cell granularity) and forward scatter (measuring cell size); dead cells were excluded from analysis on the basis of viability dye fluorescence (propidium Iodide). Fluorescent intensities for cells in the population were point-plotted on two-axis graphs or histogram using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank C.D. Vecchio, S. Badal, T. Williams, and T. Lieu at Stanford University for their critical reviews of the manuscript. We would also like to thank B. Hoyte for formatting the figures. R.T. Nitta is supported by the Mark Linder/American Brain Tumor Association Fellowship. A.J. Wong is supported by National Institutes of Health grants CA69495, CA124832, CA148491 research grants from the National Brain Tumor Foundation, and the California Breast Cancer Research Program.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Brain Tumor Research Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, and Program in Cancer Biology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
(2)
Department of Gastroenterology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhenghou, P.R. China

References

  1. Garcia de Palazzo IE, Adams GP, Sundareshan P, Wong AJ, Testa JR, Bigner DD, Weiner LM: Expression of mutated epidermal growth factor receptor by non-small cell lung carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1993, 53 (14): 3217-3220.Google Scholar
  2. Olapade-Olaopa EO, Moscatello DK, MacKay EH, Ogunbiyi JO, Shittu OB, Terry TR, Okeke LI, Wong AJ, Habib FK: A variant epidermal growth factor receptor protein is similarly expressed in benign hyperplastic and carcinomatous prostatic tissues in black and white men. West Afr J Med. 2007, 26 (1): 42-47.Google Scholar
  3. Wong AJ, Bigner SH, Bigner DD, Kinzler KW, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B: Increased expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in malignant gliomas is invariably associated with gene amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84 (19): 6899-6903. 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6899.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Libermann TA, Nusbaum HR, Razon N, Kris R, Lax I, Soreq H, Whittle N, Waterfield MD, Ullrich A, Schlessinger J: Amplification, enhanced expression and possible rearrangement of EGF receptor gene in primary human brain tumours of glial origin. Nature. 1985, 313 (5998): 144-147. 10.1038/313144a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ekstrand AJ, Sugawa N, James CD, Collins VP: Amplified and rearranged epidermal growth factor receptor genes in human glioblastomas reveal deletions of sequences encoding portions of the N- and/or C-terminal tails. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (10): 4309-4313. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wikstrand CJ, Hale LP, Batra SK, Hill ML, Humphrey PA, Kurpad SN, McLendon RE, Moscatello D, Pegram CN, Reist CJ, et al: Monoclonal antibodies against EGFRvIII are tumor specific and react with breast and lung carcinomas and malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 1995, 55 (14): 3140-3148.Google Scholar
  7. Ge H, Gong X, Tang CK: Evidence of high incidence of EGFRvIII expression and coexpression with EGFR in human invasive breast cancer by laser capture microdissection and immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98 (3): 357-361. 10.1002/ijc.10224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo X, Gong X, Tang CK: Suppression of EGFRvIII-mediated proliferation and tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells by ribozyme. Int J Cancer. 2003, 104 (6): 716-721. 10.1002/ijc.11007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Okamoto I, Kenyon LC, Emlet DR, Mori T, Sasaki J, Hirosako S, Ichikawa Y, Kishi H, Godwin AK, Yoshioka M, et al: Expression of constitutively activated EGFRvIII in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94 (1): 50-56. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01351.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Aldape KD, Ballman K, Furth A, Buckner JC, Giannini C, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Jenkins RB, James CD: Immunohistochemical detection of EGFRvIII in high malignancy grade astrocytomas and evaluation of prognostic significance. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004, 63 (7): 700-707.Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham MP, Essapen S, Thomas H, Green M, Lovell DP, Topham C, Marks C, Modjtahedi H: Coexpression, prognostic significance and predictive value of EGFR, EGFRvIII and phosphorylated EGFR in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2005, 27 (2): 317-325.Google Scholar
  12. Heimberger AB, Crotty LE, Archer GE, Hess KR, Wikstrand CJ, Friedman AH, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, Sampson JH: Epidermal growth factor receptor VIII peptide vaccination is efficacious against established intracerebral tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (11): 4247-4254.Google Scholar
  13. Moscatello DK, Holgado-Madruga M, Godwin AK, Ramirez G, Gunn G, Zoltick PW, Biegel JA, Hayes RL, Wong AJ: Frequent expression of a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor in multiple human tumors. Cancer Res. 1995, 55 (23): 5536-5539.Google Scholar
  14. Sampson JH, Crotty LE, Lee S, Archer GE, Ashley DM, Wikstrand CJ, Hale LP, Small C, Dranoff G, Friedman AH, et al: Unarmed, tumor-specific monoclonal antibody effectively treats brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (13): 7503-7508. 10.1073/pnas.130166597.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Heimberger AB, Hlatky R, Suki D, Yang D, Weinberg J, Gilbert M, Sawaya R, Aldape K: Prognostic effect of epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma multiforme patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (4): 1462-1466. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1737.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sugawa N, Ekstrand AJ, James CD, Collins VP: Identical splicing of aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor transcripts from amplified rearranged genes in human glioblastomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87 (21): 8602-8606. 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Humphrey PA, Gangarosa LM, Wong AJ, Archer GE, Lund-Johansen M, Bjerkvig R, Laerum OD, Friedman HS, Bigner DD: Deletion-mutant epidermal growth factor receptor in human gliomas: effects of type II mutation on receptor function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991, 178 (3): 1413-1420. 10.1016/0006-291X(91)91051-D.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wong AJ, Ruppert JM, Bigner SH, Grzeschik CH, Humphrey PA, Bigner DS, Vogelstein B: Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (7): 2965-2969. 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2965.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Grandis JR, Sok JC: Signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor during the development of malignancy. Pharmacol Ther. 2004, 102 (1): 37-46. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.01.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Moscatello DK, Ramirez G, Wong AJ: A naturally occurring mutant human epidermal growth factor receptor as a target for peptide vaccine immunotherapy of tumors. Cancer Res. 1997, 57 (8): 1419-1424.Google Scholar
  21. Kuan CT, Srivastava N, McLendon RE, Marasco WA, Zalutsky MR, Bigner DD: Recombinant single-chain variable fragment antibodies against extracellular epitopes of human multidrug resistance protein MRP3 for targeting malignant gliomas. Int J Cancer. 2009Google Scholar
  22. Wikstrand CJ, Cokgor I, Sampson JH, Bigner DD: Monoclonal antibody therapy of human gliomas: current status and future approaches. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1999, 18 (4): 451-464. 10.1023/A:1006354102377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sampson JH, Archer GE, Mitchell DA, Heimberger AB, Bigner DD: Tumor-specific immunotherapy targeting the EGFRvIII mutation in patients with malignant glioma. Semin Immunol. 2008, 20 (5): 267-275. 10.1016/j.smim.2008.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmittling RJ, Archer GE, Mitchell DA, Heimberger A, Pegram C, Herndon JE, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, Sampson JH: Detection of humoral response in patients with glioblastoma receiving EGFRvIII-KLH vaccines. J Immunol Methods. 2008, 339 (1): 74-81. 10.1016/j.jim.2008.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Adams GP, Schier R, McCall AM, Simmons HH, Horak EM, Alpaugh RK, Marks JD, Weiner LM: High affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of single-chain fv antibody molecules. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (12): 4750-4755.Google Scholar
  26. Langmuir VK, Mendonca HL, Woo DV: Comparisons between two monoclonal antibodies that bind to the same antigen but have differing affinities: uptake kinetics and 125I-antibody therapy efficacy in multicell spheroids. Cancer Res. 1992, 52 (17): 4728-4734.Google Scholar
  27. Jungbluth AA, Stockert E, Huang HJ, Collins VP, Coplan K, Iversen K, Kolb D, Johns TJ, Scott AM, Gullick WJ, et al: A monoclonal antibody recognizing human cancers with amplification/overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (2): 639-644. 10.1073/pnas.232686499.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bird RE, Hardman KD, Jacobson JW, Johnson S, Kaufman BM, Lee SM, Lee T, Pope SH, Riordan GS, Whitlow M: Single-chain antigen-binding proteins. Science. 1988, 242 (4877): 423-426. 10.1126/science.3140379.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Beers R, Chowdhury P, Bigner D, Pastan I: Immunotoxins with increased activity against epidermal growth factor receptor vIII-expressing cells produced by antibody phage display. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6 (7): 2835-2843.Google Scholar
  30. Patel D, Lahiji A, Patel S, Franklin M, Jimenez X, Hicklin DJ, Kang X: Monoclonal antibody cetuximab binds to and down-regulates constitutively activated epidermal growth factor receptor vIII on the cell surface. Anticancer Res. 2007, 27 (5A): 3355-3366.Google Scholar
  31. Landry RC, Klimowicz AC, Lavictoire SJ, Borisova S, Kottachchi DT, Lorimer IA, Evans SV: Antibody recognition of a conformational epitope in a peptide antigen: Fv-peptide complex of an antibody fragment specific for the mutant EGF receptor, EGFRvIII. J Mol Biol. 2001, 308 (5): 883-893. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4628.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Johns TG, Adams TE, Cochran JR, Hall NE, Hoyne PA, Olsen MJ, Kim YS, Rothacker J, Nice EC, Walker F, et al: Identification of the epitope for the epidermal growth factor receptor-specific monoclonal antibody 806 reveals that it preferentially recognizes an untethered form of the receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (29): 30375-30384. 10.1074/jbc.M401218200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Friguet B, Chaffotte AF, Djavadi-Ohaniance L, Goldberg ME: Measurements of the true affinity constant in solution of antigen-antibody complexes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Immunol Methods. 1985, 77 (2): 305-319. 10.1016/0022-1759(85)90044-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wikstrand CJ, McLendon RE, Friedman AH, Bigner DD: Cell surface localization and density of the tumor-associated variant of the epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFRvIII. Cancer Res. 1997, 57 (18): 4130-4140.Google Scholar
  35. Coloma MJ, Morrison SL: Design and production of novel tetravalent bispecific antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 1997, 15 (2): 159-163. 10.1038/nbt0297-159.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Merchant AM, Zhu Z, Yuan JQ, Goddard A, Adams CW, Presta LG, Carter P: An efficient route to human bispecific IgG. Nat Biotechnol. 1998, 16 (7): 677-681. 10.1038/nbt0798-677.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ridgway JB, Presta LG, Carter P: 'Knobs-into-holes' engineering of antibody CH3 domains for heavy chain heterodimerization. Protein Eng. 1996, 9 (7): 617-621. 10.1093/protein/9.7.617.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson MK, Weiner LM, Adams GP: Improving Monoclonal Antibodies For Cancer Therapy. Drug Development research. 2004, 61: 172-187. 10.1002/ddr.10345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Fujimori K, Covell DG, Fletcher JE, Weinstein JN: A modeling analysis of monoclonal antibody percolation through tumors: a binding-site barrier. J Nucl Med. 1990, 31 (7): 1191-1198.Google Scholar
  40. Fujimori K, Covell DG, Fletcher JE, Weinstein JN: Modeling analysis of the global and microscopic distribution of immunoglobulin G, F(ab')2, and Fab in tumors. Cancer Res. 1989, 49 (20): 5656-5663.Google Scholar
  41. Van Osdol W, Fujimori K, Weinstein JN: An analysis of monoclonal antibody distribution in microscopic tumor nodules: consequences of a "binding site barrier". Cancer Res. 1991, 51 (18): 4776-4784.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson MK, Weiner LM, Adams GP: Improving Monoclonal Antibodies For Cancer Therapy. Drug Development research. 2004, 61: 172-187. 10.1002/ddr.10345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mukasa A, Wykosky J, Ligon KL, Chin L, Cavenee WK, Furnari F: Mutant EGFR is required for maintainenece of glioma growth in vivo, and its ablation leads to escape from receptor dependence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (6): 2616-21. 10.1073/pnas.0914356107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiner LM: Bispecific antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer J. 2000, 6 (Suppl 3): S265-271.Google Scholar
  45. Shahied LS, Tang Y, Alpaugh RK, Somer R, Greenspon D, Weiner LM: Bispecific minibodies targeting HER2/neu and CD16 exhibit improved tumor lysis when placed in a divalent tumor antigen binding format. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (52): 53907-53914. 10.1074/jbc.M407888200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gupta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us