Similarity of Recombinant Human Perlecan Domain 1 by Alternative Expression Systems Bioactive Heterogenous Recombinant Human Perlecan D1
© Ellis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 13 April 2010
Accepted: 9 September 2010
Published: 9 September 2010
Heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans are diverse components of certain proteoglycans and are known to interact with growth factors as a co-receptor necessary to induce signalling and growth factor activity. In this report we characterize heterogeneously glycosylated recombinant human perlecan domain 1 (HSPG2 abbreviated as rhPln.D1) synthesized in either HEK 293 cells or HUVECs by transient gene delivery using either adenoviral or expression plasmid technology.
By SDS-PAGE analysis following anion exchange chromatography, the recombinant proteoglycans appeared to possess glycosaminoglycan chains ranging, in total, from 6 kDa to >90 kDa per recombinant. Immunoblot analysis of enzyme-digested high Mr rhPln.D1 demonstrated that the rhPln.D1 was synthesized as either a chondroitin sulfate or heparan sulfate proteoglycan, in an approximately 2:1 ratio, with negligible hybrids. Secondary structure analysis suggested helices and sheets in both recombinant species. rhPln.D1 demonstrated binding to rhFGF-2 with an apparent kD of 2 ± 0.2 nM with almost complete susceptibility to digestion by heparinase III in ligand blot analysis but not to chondroitinase digestion. Additionally, we demonstrate HS-mediated binding of both rhPln.D1 species to several other GFs. Finally, we corroborate the augmentation of FGF-mediated cell activation by rhPln.D1 and demonstrate mitogenic signalling through the FGFR1c receptor.
With importance especially to the emerging field of DNA-based therapeutics, we have shown here that proteoglycan synthesis, in different cell lines where GAG profiles typically differ, can be directed by recombinant technology to produce populations of bioactive recombinants with highly similar GAG profiles.
Heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) that decorate proteoglycan core proteins vary in chain length, net charge, and charge distribution, making them quite heterogenous. This is due, in large part, to post-translational addition, then removal, of sulfate groups to various positions on the constituent monosaccharides, orchestrated by a battery of enzymes in a tissue- or cell-specific manner . This level of complexity and potential regulation afforded by the proteoglycan system can, therefore, be considered relatively high.
The GAG heparan sulfate has an important role in regulating cell function by serving as a co-factor, or co-receptor, in growth-factor (GF) interactions. Indeed, without available heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), growth factor activity would be limited; during development, heparan sulfate (HS) deficiency is lethal  while targeted disruption of normal HS post translational modification results in a structurally altered HS and lethality, with kidney, lung, and skeletal defects [3, 4].
The most highly studied and well-understood of the interactions between HSPGs and GFs is that between heparan sulfate and fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 (FGF-1, FGF-2), two closely related members of a large FGF family . FGFs are mitogenic for a variety of cell types, promoting differentiation and wound healing . The crystal structure of the ligand/receptor complex for FGF-2 and the FGF receptor (PDB 1FQ9) has been determined, clarifying the importance of heparin (or heparan sulfate) as a co-receptor in dimerization of the growth factors and their receptors leading to activation .
Native perlecan (HSPG2, abbreviated here as Pln) is an extracellular matrix proteoglycan with three HS side chains linked to a large core protein of approximately 450 kDa in 5 recognizable domains which, themselves, are comprised of subdomains [8, 9]. Domain 1 of perlecan (Pln.D1) comprises only a small fraction of the native perlecan encoding an approximately 21 kDa protein core with the primary sequence potential for three O-linked GAG chains. While the C-terminus of Pln.D1 is known to have sequence homology with an SEA module that is also found in a related HSPG, agrin, and in regions of other biomolecules receiving extensive O-linked glycosylation , the tertiary structure of Pln.D1 is not known.
The HS of Pln.D1 is reported to promote cell adhesion [11–14], to promote proliferation and/or differentiation , and to bind and deliver growth factors [11, 16–19]. Independently, there is strong scientific support and rationale for a role of perlecan in angiogenesis or neovascularization [17, 20, 21]. Interference between FGF or VEGF and perlecan HS binding has been shown to diminish the functional activity of these GF's [6, 22].
Numerous growth factors are being tested as therapeutic agents [23–29] and some are currently commercially available. It is reasonable, therefore, that increased levels of soluble HS proteoglycan delivered concomitantly with certain growth factors would lead to enhanced growth factor activity in a physiological manner and be of value in wound management and healing.
While recombinant mouse  and human [31–33] perlecan D1 have been partially characterized, here we provide characterization of two human Pln.D1 recombinants generated from adenovirus or plasmid DNA expression.
Construction of Pln.D1 transgene
Perlecan D1 (Pln.D1) was cloned by reverse-transcriptase extension of total human endothelial cell RNA using perlecan specific primers, then amplified by PCR and cloned into pcDNA 3.3+ (Invitrogen) incorporating amino acids 1-198 or 1-247 (to include the region between domains 1 and 2 up to and including the first amino acid of domain 2). In each clone a Kozac-like sequence (ccacc) was strengthened by inserting cca immediately 5' to the native ccatg at -2 relative to the start codon (atg). The native secretory leader sequence was not modified. A 6×-His tag was added to the C-terminus of each clone for identification. Sequence identity of the full-length domain 1 clone compared to the HSPG2 (reference NP_005520.4) was confirmed. DNA stocks were prepared with Qiagen endonuclease free MaxiPrep kits.
Construction of Pln.D1 adenovirus
Pln.198 or Pln.247 transgenes were subsequently cloned into an adenoviral expression construct with a CMV-5 promoter (Adenovator, Qbiogene). Adenovirus with a Pln.D1 transgene (Pln.198-Ad and Pln.247-Ad) were isolated using a ViraKit AdenoMini-24 system (ViraPur).
Synthesis of rhPln.D1
Hek 293 cells were grown on 100 mm culture dishes in Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM, Sigma Chemical Co.) with 44 mM NaHCO3, pH 7.2, and supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Pen/Strep) at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubation chamber. HEK 293 cells were cultured to 90% confluence then transfected with lipoplexes containing Pln.198-pcDNA3.3+ or Pln.247-pcDNA3.3+ and lipofectamine2000 (LF2K, Life Technologies) in 1:1.5 or 1:2 μg DNA: μg LF2K standard ratio and following the manufacturer's instructions in the presence of serum. Cells were incubated for 3 days following transfection and conditioned media containing secreted protein was collected.
Alternatively, HEK 293 cells cultured to 90% confluency were infected with Pln.198-Ad or Pln.247-Ad at TCID50 1 × 107/ml and incubated for 5 days to express protein.
Conditioned media containing secreted protein synthesized by either method was collected and separated from cellular debris by centrifugation for 10 min at 5K rpm and 4°C and then filtered through a 0.2 μm filter prior to anionic exchange chromatography.
Purification of high Mr rhPln.D1
Filtered media was diluted 10× into Binding Buffer (containing 20 mM Tris, 62.5 mM NaCl, 0.25% Tween-20, 15 mM sodium azide, pH 8.0) and bound to a Hitrap anion exchange column (Amersham) connected to an AktaPrime FPLC at 5 ml/min. The column was washed to a flat baseline, without Tween-20, and bound contaminants were removed by a continual wash with 10% Elution Buffer (20 mM Tris, 1 M NaCl, 15 mM sodium azide, pH 8.0) until a flat baseline was reached. Remaining bound rhPln.D1 was eluted from the column with a 50 ml gradient to 100% Elution Buffer at 2.5 ml/min collecting 1 ml fractions and monitoring absorbance at 280 nm.
Analyzing the fractions by techniques described below, fractions containing the high molecular weight (Mr), glycosylated protein were pooled and the buffer was exchanged to 50 mM HEPES, 250 mM NaCl, pH 8.0 by repeated dilution and concentration using 6 ml centricones (Vivascience, Sartouris Stedim) with 10 kDa MWCO. After anionic exchange chromatography and pooling of heterogeneous fractions, enriched high Mr rhPln.247 from 100 ml conditioned medium generated by adenovirus yielded 25 ml of 140 μg/ml protein as determined by Abs280 using a calculated extinction coefficient of 28795 M-1cm-1 for the recombinant. Enriched high Mr rhPln.198 from 100 ml conditioned medium yielded 10 ml of 140 ug/ml as determined by Abs280 and a calculated extinction coefficient of 25440 M-1 cm-1. Plasmid transfection generated approximately 3 fold less recombinant than adenoviral infection, per volume conditioned media. For storage, 1% glycerol was added to the protein stock and protein was stored at -20°C.
Proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel at 200 V and transferred to nitrocellulose utilizing a BioRad Mini Transblot system at 0.3 Amp for 90 mins. The blot was blocked in 1.3 mM KCl, 0.8 mM KH2PO4, 68 mM NaCl, and 4.1 mM Na2HPO4 (PBS) containing 15 mM sodium azide and 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-Tween) for 30 min at room temperature and with agitation. The blot was then incubated in primary antibody CSI 001-71 (Assay Designs, clone A71) overnight at 4°C with rocking, washed in PBS-Tween, and incubated in goat-anti-mouse AP conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam) for 2 hr at 4°C with rocking. After washing, the blot was developed with SigmaFast BCIP/NBT tablets dissolved in ddH2O and imaged on a Kodak GelLogic 1500 Imaging System.
Acidic and/or glycosylated Pln.D1 was visualized by SDS-PAGE and Stains-All staining enhanced by silver nitrate similar to the protocols of Goldberg and Warner . Proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, and the gel was washed for 30 mins in 100 ml of 25% isopropanol with 5 solution changes to remove the SDS. The gel was then incubated in 30 ml of Stains-All staining solution (0.025% Stains-All in 30 mM Tris, 7.5% formamide, 25% isopropanol, pH 8.0 from a stock of 0.25% Stains-All in formamide) overnight in a light-tight box at room temperature with agitation. The stain was removed, and the gel was destained in 100 ml of 25% isopropanol maintaining light tightness until the background was a light pink and protein bands could be discerned. The gel was imaged on a Kodak GelLogic 1500 with transmitted white light for 2.4 ms exposure with an f-stop of 5.6. After imaging, the gel was allowed to fade by light in 25% isopropanol intermittently exchanged with ddH2O to a clear background. The gel was then washed thrice with ddH2O and incubated in 60 ml of freshly prepared 12 mM AgNO3 for 30 mins, rinsed three times in ddH2O, and developed with 70 ml of 0.28 M Na2HCO3, 0.15% formaldehyde after rinsing the gel twice quickly with approximately 15 ml of the same solution. The development reaction was stopped with 10% acetic acid. The gel was again imaged using the GelLogic 1500.
Enzyme linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA) were performed in polystyrene microtiter wells. Proteins were coated overnight at 4°C onto the surfaces in PBS and 15 mM sodium azide (PBS-N3). All wells were then blocked and washed in PBS-Tween. Primary murine antibodies were applied in PBS-Tween at a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml overnight at 4°C. Secondary goat anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Abcam) were applied at a concentration of 1 μg/ml for 2 h then AP activity was monitored at 405 nm by hydrolysis of the substrate 4-Nitrophenylphosphate (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) in 10 mM Tris, pH 9.5 with 5 mM MgCl2 using a Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc. μQuant spectrophotometer (absorbance maximum of 3.0 ELISA units). Apparent dissociation constants (kD) were derived by solid-phase with ELISA as previously described  and presented with standard deviation.
Mass spectrometry analysis
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was performed after tryptic digestion of rhPln.198 and rhPln.247 purified protein. Enzymatic digestion with trypsin (12.5 ng/μl) (Promega Gold Trypsin Mass Spectrometry Grade) was carried out for sixteen hours at 37°C. Peptide solutions were then extracted using two washes of 100 μl of a 50/50 solution of 5% formic acid and acetonitrile for thirty minutes. Supernatants were collected and dried down in a Savant SpeedVac. Samples were resuspended in 40 μl of 0.1% formic acid. C18 ZipTips (Millipore) were used to desalt peptide mixtures before analysis. An aliquot (5-10 μl) of each digest was loaded onto a 5 mm × 100 μm i.d. C18 reverse-phase cartridge at 2 μl/min. After washing the cartridge for 5 min with 0.1% formic acid in ddH20, the bound peptides were flushed onto a 22 cm × 100 μm i.d. C18 reverse-phase analytical column with a 25 min linear 5-50% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% formic acid at 500 nl/min. The column was washed with 90% acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid for 15 min and then re-equilibrated with 5% acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid for 24 min. The eluted peptides were passed directly from the tip into a modified MicroIonSpray interface of an Applied Biosystems-MDS-Sciex (Concorde, Ontario, Canada) 4000 Qtrap mass spectrometer. Eluted peptides were subjected to a survey MS scan to determine the top three most intense ions. A second scan (the enhanced resolution scan) determined the charge state of the selected ions. Finally, enhanced product ion scans were carried out to obtain the tandem mass spectrum of the selected parent ions (with the declustering potential raised to 100 V) over the range from m/z 400-1500. Spectra were centroided and de-isotoped by Analyst Software, version 1.42 (Applied Biosystems). These tandem mass spectrometry data were processed to provide protein identifications using an in-house MASCOT search engine (Matrix Science) against the NCBInr Human Protein database.
Circular dichroism of rhPln.D1
CD was performed on 5.6 μM rhPln.198 or 8.4 μM rhPln.247 in 25 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 using a Jasco J-815 spectrometer at 20°C, 0.5 mm pathlength cell, 4 accumulations, 1 nm steps, and from 240 to 190 nm. Buffer was the baseline and was subtracted from the protein spectrum. All spectra were computationally smoothed and filtered (FFT) with the Jasco Spectra Analysis software. Estimations of helix and strand content were calculated with Raussens method http://perry.freeshell.org/raussens.html.
Growth factor ligand blot
rhPln.D1 samples were separated on a 12% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose for 1.5 hr at 0.3 Amp. After blocking, blots were incubated in 0.1 μg/ml rhFGF-2 (R&D Systems) in PBS-Tween overnight at 4°C with rocking. Blots were washed in PBS-Tween and incubated in 1 μg/ml anti-FGF-biotin antibody (R&D Systems) for 4 hr at 4°C with rocking, then washed in PBS-Tween, and incubated in 1 μg/ml streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (R&D Systems) for 2 hr at 4°C with rocking. Blots were then developed and imaged as described in the section Western blots above.
Enriched Pln.D1 was digested with heparinase I, II (Sigma or IBEX Technologies), and III (Seikagaku) and with chondroitinase ABC (Seikagaku) overnight at 37°C with 1 mU of enzyme/μg Pln.D1 in 50 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. Controls of undigested protein were also incubated in the same manner. Digested samples were examined by mAb 001-71 Western blot and Stains-All/Silver SDS-PAGE applying 2.8 μg protein/lane.
Ligand binding ELISA
The ligand binding assay was a variant of the ELISA in which dilutions of ligand (rhFGF-2) were allowed to bind to a ligand binding protein such as rhPln.D1 that had been coated onto the wells in PBS-N3. The bound ligand was then detected with biotin-conjugated mAb specific for hFGF-2 which was followed by a streptavidin-AP conjugate and developed as described for ELISA. Apparent kD were derived as previously described  in these assays using serial dilutions of ligand with even amounts of coated ligand binding protein. Results are accompanied by standard deviation.
Growth factor dot blots
Growth factors rhFGF-2, rhVEGF165, rhVEGF189, rhPDGF-BB, rhEGF, rhIGF, rhFGF-7, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-6, rhBMP-7, rhBMP-9, and rhBMP-14 were bound to nitrocellulose at 500 ng utilizing a BioRad dot blot apparatus. Blots were blocked in PBS-Tween and incubated in 1 μg/ml rhPln.198 or rhPln.247 (separate blots) in PBS-Tween overnight at 4°C with rocking. Alternatively, some blots were incubated in heparinise III digested rhPln.247 (also 1 μg/ml) overnight at 4°C with rocking. After washing, blots were incubated in 3 ug/ml rhPln.D1 primary antibody CSI 001-71 in PBS-Tween overnight at 4°C with rocking. Blots were then washed and incubated in 1 ug/ml goat-anti-mouse AP conjugated secondary antibody for 2 hr at 4°C with rocking. Blots were then developed and imaged as described.
Baf32 proliferation assays
Proliferation of FGFR1c-expressing Baf32 cells were monitored via MTS reagent and absorbance at 490 nm with the addition of 0.3 nM rhFGF-2 and titration of rhPln.247. Baf32 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% v/v FBS, 10% v/v WEHI-3BD conditioned medium and 1% v/v penicillin/streptomycin. For the mitogenic assays, the Baf32 cells were transferred into IL-3 depleted medium in low serum for 24 h prior to experimentation and seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well in the presence of FGF-2 (0.03 nM), heparin (30 nM) and either HCAEC perlecan (2 μg/ml) or rhPln.247 (1-20 μg/ml). Cells were incubated for 96 h in 5% CO2 at 37°C and the amount of cells present was assessed using the MTS reagent (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) by adding to the cell cultures for 6 h prior to measuring the absorbance at 490 nm.
HUVEC proliferation assays
HUVEC were purchased from Lifeline Cell Technologies, Inc. and cultured according to the manufacturer's instructions with LCT VascuLife EnGS medium including all supplied LifeFactors (2% serum, L-glutamine, Hydrocortisone, Heparin, Ascorbic acid, EGF, EnGs). For proliferation studies, low passage number cells (below P14) were seeded in 96 well plates directly into experimental medium at 104 cells/well in 200 μl Assay Medium, LCT VascuLife EnGs containing only selected LifeFactors (2% serum, L-glutamine, Hydrocortisone, EnGS). Experimental conditions included 5 ng/ml of growth factor (rhFGF-2, R&D Systems) in Assay Medium with dilutions of enriched rhPln.198 or rhPln.247. Cell count was measured after 48 hr incubation by conversion of Dojindo's CCK8 dye with 1 hr incubation on live cells. Resulting absorbance of the converted substrate was measured at 450 nm in a parallel microtiter plate. Measurements were adjusted for background with measurements taken from control media.
Anion exchange chromatographic separation of rhPln.D1 by GAG level
While it appeared by immunoblot with mAb 001-71 that the overwhelming majority of both rhPln.198 and rhPln.247 were poorly glycosylated, the use of protein staining in companion Stains-All gels (Figure 1D,E) or silver stain (not shown) demonstrated that the more extensively glycosylated species constituted the majority of recombinant in the eluant, suggesting that the CSI 001-71 mAb had been more reactive with rhPln.D1 species having undeveloped or shortened GAG chains.
Native Pln not detected in high Mr rhPln.D1 preparation
CS and HS decorate rhPln.D1 but not together
FGF-2 binding is mediated by rhPln.D1 HS but not CS
rhPln.D1 HS mediates binding to several growth factors
Mitogenic activity of rhPln.247 and rhPln.198
Graham et al had demonstrated that a human perlecan domain 1 recombinant from HEK 293 cells was 67% HS, but that a fusion of domain 1 with the large C-terminal globular protein EGFP resulted in a 100% HS recombinant, similar to what is typically found in the native perlecan . Also, Doege et al showed a predominately HS decoration of recombinant Pln.D1 when expressed with domains II and III in Cos-7 cells . It appears, therefore, that structural changes to the C-terminus of domain 1 of perlecan can have a qualitative role in the post-translational glycosaminoglycan decoration of the core, and it is all the more interesting that the rhPln.198 and the rhPln.247, which are different by 49 amino acids at the C-terminus, were similar in their CS/HS ratio of approximately 2:1. Further, by gel analysis of glycosidase-treated recombinants (both rhPln.198 and rhPln.247) using both western blot (Figure 5), silver stain and Stains-All (not shown), recombinant was shown to be predominately synthesized with either only HS glycosylation or only CS glycosylation, but not with both, similar to the two pools of rhPln.D1 previously demonstrated using the mouse perlecan, one having only HS and the other containing CS [30, 38].
It is postulated that the action of two separate enzymes dictates whether a beta-GalNAc or alpha-GlcNAc linkage is formed following the linker tetrasaccharide, hence initiating a CS or HS GAG, respectively (reviewed in ). In our work, separate pools of homogenous GAG types may have derived from variable, or more labile, tertiary structures of the truncated core proteins that favored either HS or CS enzymatic initiation. Alternatively, signals for specific HS or CS initiation, possibly relating to differential transit through the Golgi, were removed in truncation resulting in balanced populations of HS or CS species initiated in either the Golgi or trans-Golgi network, respectively . Interestingly, the relatively higher proportion of CS-Pln.D1 in our enriched pools may be due to lower intravesicular pH, where more acidic vesicles are more likely to result in relatively less HS and relatively more CS . Accordingly, the calculated pI of the rhPln.D1 is an acidic 4.5 as compared to a pI of 6.5 for the full length perlecan core.
These data demonstrated synthesis of recombinant Pln.D1 with highly heterogenous GAG chains contributing approximately 6-90 kDa to the rhPln.D1 core, consistent with the HS chain length previously estimated in rhPln.D1 characterized elsewhere  but greater than what had been estimated for recombinant mouse Pln.D1, also expressed in HEK 293 cells  or in CHO K1 cells . In anion exchange chromatography, we hypothesized that recombinant Pln.D1 would elute primarily by degree of sulfation, though what we found was that the species with the lower net apparent kDa (shorter GAGs) eluted earliest. With increasing salt eluted rhPln.D1 species with increasing GAG length and greater apparent kDa. This would also suggest an overall similarity throughout each of the synthesized recombinant populations with regard to net sulfation.
Not only does the primary sequence of Pln.D1 permit both HS and CS , but the cell type in which Pln is produced can influence the GAG composition; mixed forms have been seen in EHS tumor cells , and glomerular epithelial cells . Sulfation patterns on perlecan can also vary significantly depending on the cell type, and endothelial cells, including HUVEC, have previously been shown  to synthesize a perlecan with relatively less FGF-2 binding activity than other cell types, emphasizing the potential value of in situ post-translational modification with the use of recombinant biologics for therapy.
Typical interactions between FGF-2 and HS proteoglycans has been reported to range from kD = 0.5 nM for syndecan-3  to kD = 2 nM for the secondary phase of binding to HUAEC perlecan , to kD = 15 nM for HS recovered from mouse embryonic fibroblasts . Our estimated kD of 2 ± 0.2 nM for FGF-2 binding to both rhPln.198 and rhPln.247 synthesized by HEK 293 cells was similar in magnitude and virtually identical to the apparent net affinity of rhFGF-2 for a commercial HSPG. These data support the hypothesis that the quality of the HS decorating the rhPln.198 and rhPln.247 are quite similar.
While CS of rhPln.D1 has been shown to bind rhFGF-2 , in our system, chondroitinase ABC insignificantly affected the rhPln.198 or rhPln.247 binding to FGF-2. Our data suggested that HS participated in FGF-2 binding to the rhPln.D1 synthesized in HEK 293 cells while CS did not significantly contribute to the GF binding, similar to data reported for a pool of mouse Pln.D1 produced in a similar cell line . Baf32 cells are an IL-3 dependent and HSPG deficient myeloid B cell line which have been stably transfected with either FGFR1c or FGFR3c [46, 47]. The data presented here clearly demonstrated a strong co-receptor activity of the rhPln.247 with the rhFGF-2 signalling through the FGFR1c. Interestingly, mitogenic dose dependence of rhPln.247 in Baf32 cell culture supplemented with FGF-2 was also in the presence of low-level heparin. While the FGF-2/heparin combination provided no mitogenic effect, the FGF-2/rhPln.D1 combination in the presence of the heparin was highly mitogenic, highlighting the functional difference between the recombinant HSPG and heparin resulting from qualitative and quantitative differences in sulfation.
There is good evidence that the HS proteoglycans interact with several growth factors such as the VEGFs and BMPs via the HS chains [48–51]. Data presented support this potentially broad role of HS GAGs in mediating GF activities and support the possibility of enhanced growth factor function in wound healing through the use of recombinant HS proteoglycans.
Currently, no structural data exists for Pln.D1 and the limited sequence identity of Pln.D1 with other known structures causes difficulty in modelling of the full domain. The SEA domain, approximately 90 amino acids at the C-terminus of Pln.198, suggests a mixed α-helix and β-sheet configuration. The CD data presented for rhPln.198 and rhPln.247 confirm that hypothesis. rhPln.247 spectral analysis demonstrated a difference with rhPln.198 in the amount of helix vs. strand, which may be due to the 47 additional amino acids forming a C-terminal cysteine knot.
Assessment of the enriched recombinant pools using two different antibodies known to recognize domain 1 of perlecan (CSI 001-A71 and -A76) provided additional evidence that the proteoglycan pool was predominately recombinant D1 without detectable native D1. Support for this derives from published work showing mAb A76 to react relatively strongly with native perlecan D1, while reacting very weakly with a Pln.196-EGFP C-terminal fusion protein . Further support was obtained in our labs with immunoblots demonstrating a significantly reduced binding signal from the A76 mAb relative to the A71 mAb for various rhPln.D1 species (not shown) and ELISA data showing poor A76 reactivity against rhPln.247 and strong reactivity with full-length endothelial perlecan, while A71 reacted strongly to both the native full-length perlecan and the truncated recombinant (inset Figure 2). Therefore, contaminating levels of native perlecan within the enriched recombinant preparations would have also been detected with the A76 antibody, but were not.
Pln.D1 plasmid expression has been used to generate relatively high levels of small, soluble, stable recombinant HS proteoglycan. While the benefits of inserting an alternative leader sequence have been described , we found that use of the CMV promoter with the native leader sequence had the potential for excellent expression of rhPln.198 and rhPln.247 from both the adenoviral and plasmid expressions systems, by both HEK cells and HUVECs. While we did not test constructs with the minimal native Kozak-like sequence for ribosome binding, we suspect that improvement of the Kozak sequence also contributed to a relative high expression level for these recombinant proteoglycan constructs.
As more is presented and understood about proteoglycan synthetic pathways and their controlling factors, the applicability and usefulness of a secreted, functional, soluble, relatively small-sized recombinant HS proteoglycan should increase. With consistent synthesis and recovery of a HS-decorated rhPln.D1 pool that has the potential to bind and activate growth factors, the use of Pln.D1 as a research tool and therapeutic adjunct for a number of indications is possible and currently in testing.
We thank the University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics facility for mass spectrometry assistance, in particular Landon Shay Wilson. We also thank the Department of Chemistry, UAB for the use of the Jasco J-815 spectrometer. This publication was made possible by grant # DE016771 from the NIDCR, an NIH institute, and its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and Agenta Biotechnologies and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIDCR.
- Whitelock JM, Iozzo RV: Chem Rev. 2005, 105: 2745-2764. 10.1021/cr010213m.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin X, Wei G, Shi Z, Dryer L, Esko JD, Wells DE, Matzuk MM: Dev Biol. 2000, 224: 299-311. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9798.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li JP, Gong F, Hagner-McWhirter A, Forsberg E, Abrink M, Kisilevsky R, Zhang X, Lindahl U: J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 28363-28366. 10.1074/jbc.C300219200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ringvall M, Ledin J, Holmborn K, van Kuppevelt T, Ellin F, Eriksson I, Olofsson AM, Kjellen L, Forsberg E: J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 25926-25930. 10.1074/jbc.C000359200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Itoh N: Biol Pharm Bull. 2007, 30: 1819-1825. 10.1248/bpb.30.1819.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Richardson TP, Trinkaus-Randall V, Nugent MA: J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 13534-13540. 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13534.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schlessinger J, Plotnikov AN, Ibrahimi OA, Eliseenkova AV, Yeh BK, Yayon A, Linhardt RJ, Mohammadi M: Mol Cell. 2000, 6: 743-750. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00073-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noonan DM, Fulle A, Valente P, Cai S, Horigan E, Sasaki M, Yamada Y, Hassell JR: J Biol Chem. 1991, 266 (34): 22939-22947.Google Scholar
- Murdoch AD, Dodge GR, Cohen I, Tuan RS, Iozzo RV: J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 8544-8557.Google Scholar
- Akhavan A, Crivelli SN, Singh M, Lingappa VR, Muschler JL: Faseb J. 2008, 22: 612-621. 10.1096/fj.07-8354com.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klein G, Conzelmann S, Beck S, Timpl R, Muller CA: Matrix Biol. 1995, 14: 457-465. 10.1016/0945-053X(95)90003-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carson DD, Tang JP, Julian J: Dev. Biol. 1993, 155: 97-106. 10.1006/dbio.1993.1010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- SundarRaj N, Fite D, Ledbetter S, Chakravarti S, Hassell JR: Journal of Cell Science. 1995, 108 (Pt 7): 2663-2672.Google Scholar
- Whitelock JM, Graham LD, Melrose J, Murdoch AD, Iozzo RV, Underwood PA: Matrix Biology. 1999, 18: 163-178. 10.1016/S0945-053X(99)00014-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma B, Handler M, Eichstetter I, Whitelock JM, Nugent MA, Iozzo RV: J Clin Invest. 1998, 102: 1599-1608. 10.1172/JCI3793.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nugent MA, Iozzo RV: Int J Biochem Cell Bio. 2000, 32: 115-120. 10.1016/S1357-2725(99)00123-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aviezer D, Hecht D, Safran M, Eisinger M, David G, Yayon A: Cell. 1994, 79: 1005-1013. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90031-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitelock JM, Murdoch AD, Iozzo RV, Underwood PA: J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 10079-10086. 10.1074/jbc.271.17.10079.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mongiat M, Otto J, Oldershaw R, Ferrer F, Sato JD, Iozzo RV: J Biol Chem. 2001, 30: 10263-10271. 10.1074/jbc.M011493200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zoeller JJ, Whitelock JM, Iozzo RV: Matrix Biology. 2009Google Scholar
- Vischer P, Feitsma K, Schon P, Volker W: Eur J Cell Bio. 1997, 73: 332-343.Google Scholar
- D'souza S, Yang W, Marchetti D, Muir C, Farach-Carson M, Carson D: J Cell Biochem. 2008, 105: 1183-1193. 10.1002/jcb.21899.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schumacher B, Stegmann T, Pecher P: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1998, 39: 783-789.Google Scholar
- Comerota AJ, Throm RC, Miller KA, Henry T, Chronos N, Laird J, Sequeira R, Kent CK, Bacchetta M, Goldman C, Salenius JP, Schmieder FA, Pilsudski R: J Vasc Surg. 2002, 35: 930-936. 10.1067/mva.2002.123677.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hull MA, Knifton A, Filipowicz B, Brough JL, Vautier G, Hawkey CJ: Gut. 1997, 40: 204-210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Obara K, Ishihara M, Fujita M, Kanatani Y, Hattori H, Matsui T, Takase B, Ozeki Y, Nakamura S, Ishizuka T, Tominaga S, Hiroi S, Kawai T, Maehara T: Wound Repair Regen. 2005, 13: 390-397. 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130406.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rajagopalan S, Shah M, Luciano A, Crystal R, Nabel EG: Circulation. 2001, 104: 753-755. 10.1161/hc3201.095192.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tio RA, Tan ES, Jessurun GA, Veeger N, Jager PL, Slart RH, de Jong RM, Pruim J, Hospers GA, Willemsen AT, de Jongste MJ, van Boven AJ, van Veldhuisen DJ, Zijlstra F: J Nucl Med. 2004, 45: 1437-1443.Google Scholar
- Losordo DW, Vale PR, Hendel RC, Milliken CE, Fortuin FD, Cummings N, Schatz RA, Asahara T, Isner JM, Kuntz RE: Circulation. 2002, 105: 2012-2018. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000015982.70785.B7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costell M, Mann K, Yamada Y, Timpl R: Eur J Biochem. 1997, 243: 115-121. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00115.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graham LD, Whitelock JM, Underwood PA: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999, 256: 542-548. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang WD, Gomes RR, Alicknavitch M, Farach-Carson MC, Carson DD: Tissue Eng. 2005, 11: 76-89. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Groffen AJ, Buskens CA, Tryggvason K, Veerkamp JH, Monnens LA, van den Heuvel LP: Eur J Biochem. 1996, 241: 827-834. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00827.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg HA, Warner KJ: Anal Biochem. 1997, 251: 227-233. 10.1006/abio.1997.2252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qiu X, Schroeder P, Bridon D: J Immunol. 1996, 156: 3350-3356.Google Scholar
- van Kuppevelt TH, Dennissen MA, van Venrooij WJ, Hoet RM, Veerkamp JH: J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 12960-12966. 10.1074/jbc.273.21.12960.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doege K, Chen X, Cornuet PK, Hassell J: Matrix Biology. 1997, 16: 211-221. 10.1016/S0945-053X(97)90010-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kokenyesi R, Silbert JE: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995, 211: 262-267. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prydz K, Dalen KT: Journal of Cell Science. 2000, 113 (Pt 2): 193-205.Google Scholar
- Grøndahl F, Tveit H, Prydz K: Biochem J. 2009, 418: 517-528. 10.1042/BJ20081179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Danielson KG, Martinez-Hernandez A, Hassell JR, Iozzo RV: Matrix. 1992, 12: 22-35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Det NF, Van Den Born J, Tamsma JT, Verhagen NA, van den Heuvel LP, Berden JH, Bruijn JA, Daha MR, van der Woude FJ: Biochem J. 1995, 307 (Pt 3): 759-768.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knox S, Merry C, Stringer S, Melrose J, Whitelock J: J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 14657-14565.Google Scholar
- Chernousov MA, Carey DJ: J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 16810-16814.Google Scholar
- Sugaya N, Habuchi H, Nagai N, Ashikari-Hada S, Kimata K: J Biol Chem. 2008Google Scholar
- Ornitz DM, Leder P: J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 16305-16311.Google Scholar
- Ornitz DM, Xu J, Colvin JS, McEwen DG, MacArthur CA, Coulier F, Gao G, Goldfarb M: J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 15292-15297. 10.1074/jbc.271.25.15292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson CJ, Mulloy B, Gallagher JT, Stringer SE: J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 1731-1740. 10.1074/jbc.M510760200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cool S, Nurcombe V: J Cell Biochem. 2006, 99: 1040-1051. 10.1002/jcb.20936.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takada T: J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 43229-43235. 10.1074/jbc.M300937200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Irie A, Habuchi H, Kimata K, Sanai Y: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 308: 858-865. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01500-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitelock J, Ma JL, Davies N, Nielsen N, Chuang C, Rees M, Iozzo RV, Knox S, Lord M: J Chem Tech Biotech. 2008, 83: 496-504. 10.1002/jctb.1835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitelock J: Methods Mol. Biol. 2001, 171: 27-34.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.