Skip to main content

Process optimization and effect of thermal, alkaline, H2O2 oxidation and combination pretreatment of sewage sludge on solubilization and anaerobic digestion

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the feasibility of enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with triple, dual, and individual pretreatment of waste activated sludge with heat, alkalinity, and hydrogen peroxide. These pretreatments disrupt sludge flocs, organisms’ cell walls, extracellular polymeric substance, and intracellular organic matter, which increase biodegradability and hydrolysis rate of activate sludge. In addition, the influence of various variables on methane production was analyzed using the response surface methodology with the quadratic model. Eventually, an optimized temperature and chemical concentration for the highest methane production and lowest chemical usage is suggested.

Results

The highest amount of methane production was obtained from the sludge pretreated with triple pretreatment (heat (90 °C), alkaline (pH = 12), and hydrogen peroxide (30 mg H2O2/g TS)), which had better performance with 96% higher methane production than that of the control sample with temperature of 25 °C approximately and a pH = 8. Response surface methodology with a quadratic model was also used for analyzing the influence of temperature, pH, and hydrogen peroxide concentration on anaerobic digestion efficiency. It was revealed that the optimized temperature, pH, and hydrogen peroxide concentration for maximizing methane production and solubilization of sludge and minimizing thermal energy and chemical additives of the pretreatments are 83.2 °C, pH = 10.6 and 34.8 mg H2O2/g TS, respectively, has the desirability of 0.67.

Conclusion

This study reveals that triple pretreatment of waste activated sludge performed better than dual and individual pretreatment, respectively, in all desirable output parameters including increasing methane production as the most important output, increasing in COD solubilization, protein and polysaccharide, and decreasing in VSS solubilization.

Background

Energy supply is one of the most important challenges in today’s world. Nowadays, the most important source of energy production, especially in developing countries, is fossil fuels due to their easy availability and low cost. However, fossil fuels have many problems, including environmental problems and non-renewability. Therefore, the need for renewable and clean energy is rapidly increasing [1]. On the other hand, contamination caused by human activity has created numerous problems for the environment such as climate change, ozone depletion, plant and aquatic species extinction, and water contamination [2]. One way to address these issues is the use of wastewater treatment plants, in which wastewater is treated prior to being released into water streams. An important challenge associated with wastewater treatment plants is the management of sludge produced from the treatment process. This is important because sludge treatment units are the most cost-intensive parts of wastewater treatment plants, accounting for up to 60% of their total operating costs [3,4,5].

As a practical solution for simultaneous renewable energy production and contamination removal from the sludge treatment process, anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge has been used widely in wastewater treatment plants [6]. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge includes four predominant reactions, namely hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis. Hydrolysis reaction plays an important role in converting organic matter to readily biodegradable organic matter for organisms’ consumption, in which high molecular weight compounds such as protein, carbohydrates, and lipids are converted to a soluble phase. However, this stage is often restricted because of poor biodegradability of organic matter especially in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge [7]. To address this issue, recent researches have focused on different methods of enhancing the hydrolysis rate of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with the thermal, chemical, and mechanical treatment of the sludge prior to anaerobic digestion [8,9,10,11,12]. These pretreatments disrupt sludge flocs, organisms’ cell walls, extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), intracellular organic matter, and multivalent cations, which increase biodegradability and hydrolysis rate of organic matter [13, 14]. According to recent studies, thermal pretreatment at a low temperature, alkaline pretreatment, and hydrogen peroxide pretreatment of sewage sludge have been considered as high-performance pretreatments in enhancing anaerobic digestion [10, 15].

Alkaline pretreatment is an effective method known in pretreatment methods, which can lead to the solubility of lignin and the types of neutralized acids produced by lignocellulosic complexes. In addition, the presence of a small amount of remaining alkali after pretreatment may help to stabilize pH during the acidogenesis process [16]. In many cases, as a post-digestion measure, lime as alkaline agent is added to the sludge so as to increase pH and kill pathogens, which improves the applicability of the sludge for different purposes such as fertilization [16].

Heat pretreatment especially at temperature above 100 °C is initially used to improve sludge dewaterability by destroying the gel structure, which can destroy cell walls to release organic chemicals into the soluble phase, resulting in higher biodegradation and lower sludge viscosity [17]. Thermal pretreatment is divided into two cases: low temperature (lower than 100 °C) and high temperature (higher than 100 °C). The pretreatment method, in which a lower temperature is used, is considered more economically attractive and environmentally friendly.

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has been successfully used for disintegration of anaerobic biomass [18]; this is due to the production of free radicals such as NO•2 and HO• that disrupt cell walls, proteins, membrane phospholipids and EPS [19,20,21]. Interestingly, it has been revealed that H2O2 could be produced in situ from wastewater through a bio-electrochemical system [22]. Furthermore, Zhang et al. [23] reveal that H2O2 as a potential substance for combined pretreatments can increase methane production from waste activated sludge by 23%. Moreover, H2O2 causes the organic matter to enter the soluble phase and the microbial quality of sludge is slightly increased due to the lack of organic matter [14].

Therefore, thermal pretreatment was carried out in a warm water bath which was set at two specific temperatures. For alkaline pretreatment, by adding an adequate amount of the 1 N NaOH solution to the activated sludge which was filled in 1-l glasses, the pH of the containers was set at the particular numbers. In pretreatment with H2O2, values of 30 and 60 mg of H2O2/g TS were added to the activated sludge in the glasses. Moreover, in dual and triple pretreatments, the pretreatments were performed in a specific order in following with which was done for the single pretreatment.

This is the first study to analyze and optimize combined thermal, alkaline, and hydrogen peroxide pretreatment of waste activated sludge for enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. In addition, the influence of various variables on methane production was analyzed using the response surface methodology (RSM) with the quadratic model. Eventually, an optimized temperature and chemical concentration for the highest methane production and lowest chemical usage is suggested.

Results

Source and characterization of sludge

Primary sludge, activated sludge, and inoculum were collected from South Tehran’s wastewater treatment plant. This plant is the largest wastewater treatment plant in the Middle East with the capacity of 450,000 m3/day to receive and process a sewage flow. Primary sludge from gravitational sedimentation, activated sludge from a belt thickener, and inoculum from mesophilic anaerobic digesters were collected for subsequent use. Primary and waste activated sludge were maintained at 4 °C and inoculum at 37 °C before being used in the experiments. Table 1 lists the main characteristics of primary sludge, waste activated sludge, and inoculum.

Table 1 Characteristics of sludge used in the experiment

Pretreatment effect on organic matter solubilization

Considering the results of previous studies [4, 24, 25] and the effectiveness of the pre-tests performed in this study, the proposed input range, as shown in Table 2, was applied. For statistical analysis, variable levels were normalized to three levels low (0), medium (1), and high (2).

Table 2 Levels and code of variables

Table 3 shows the effects of different pretreatments on the solubility of organic matter in waste activated sludge. A significant increase in COD solubility in all treated samples was observed compared to the controls, varying from 3.65 to 30.37%. The highest increase in sCOD was due to the triple combination of A2 + B2 + C1 (19th test) pretreatment, which increased the sCOD to 19.29 g/L. Similar results are recorded in previous research [24, 26]. On the other hand, VSS variations are closely correlated with the sCOD. The highest VSS reduction, which was equal to 19.71 g/L, was also obtained from the combined pretreatment of A2 + B2 + C1. According to the ANOVA table for COD solubility (Additional file 1: Table S1), a second-order model with respect to R2 > 0.98 and p-value = 0.0003, which is smaller than the acceptable value of 0.05 has been suggested. According to the analysis and by eliminating the unwanted terms, the following equation is proposed for COD solubility:

$$ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{OD}\ \mathrm{solubilization}\left(\%\right)=\hbox{-} 67.011\hbox{-} 0.166\times \mathrm{A}+13.481\times \mathrm{B}+0.210\times \mathrm{C}\hbox{-} 0.017\times \mathrm{A}\times \mathrm{B}+0.004\times {\mathrm{A}}^2\hbox{-} 0.509\times {\mathrm{B}}^2\hbox{-} 0.003\times {\mathrm{C}}^2 $$
(1)
Table 3 Experimental design with response surface methodology and the results

According to the ANOVA table for VSS (Additional file 1: Table S1), each of the input variables had a significant effect on VSS solubility with R2 > 0.98 and p-value< 0.05. Interaction effects of B × C and C × A were removed because of their inappropriate p-value (> 0.05). According to the statistical analyses performed by the RSM and by eliminating the unwanted terms, the following equation is proposed for the VSS solubility:

$$ \mathrm{VSS}\ \mathrm{Solubilization}\left(\%\right)=-130.034-0.180\times \mathrm{A}+25.442\times \mathrm{B}+0.343\times \mathrm{C}-0.023\times \mathrm{A}\times \mathrm{B}+0.006\times {\mathrm{A}}^2-1.001\times {\mathrm{B}}^2-0.005\times {\mathrm{C}}^2 $$
(2)

In this study, the amount of soluble protein and soluble polysaccharide were measured before and after the treatments. According to the data obtained, the amount of soluble protein and soluble polysaccharide increased significantly when the pretreatments were applied to waste activated sludge. This enhancement was more considerable when a higher concentration of chemicals and higher temperature were used. The highest enhancement in soluble protein and soluble polysaccharide obtained from the bioreactor pre-treated with 20th test, in which they respectively reached to 3.91 g/L and 0.59 g/L. These values are considerably higher than those obtained from the control bioreactor with 0.52 g/L (soluble protein) and 0.01 g/L (soluble polysaccharide). The amount of soluble protein and soluble polysaccharide experienced a slight increase in the control bioreactor without any chemical addition or pH control, confirming a slight solubilization in the control due to natural activity of the organisms. A similar enhancement was observed in previous studies [12, 27]. For protein changes, the quadratic model is proposed with R2 > 0.97 and p-value = 0.0008 (Additional file 1: Table S1). The proposed model with the elimination of unwanted terminology is equal to:

$$ \mathrm{Increase}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{Protein}\ \left(\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{L}\right)=\hbox{-} 8.071\hbox{-} 0.042\times \mathrm{A}+1.728\times \mathrm{B}+0.012\times \mathrm{C}+0.002\times \mathrm{B}\times \mathrm{C}+0.001\times {\mathrm{A}}^2\hbox{-} 0.070\times {\mathrm{B}}^2\hbox{-} 0.0002\times {\mathrm{C}}^2 $$
(3)

Figure 1 shows the normal probability figures of COD and protein solubility. According to these forms, the less the dispersion of the existing data, the closer the results are to the normal line. In other words, when the R2 value tends to 1, the proposed model is stronger. Contour and 3D curves for COD and protein solubility at various concentrations of 0, 30, and 60 mg H2O2/g TS are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. According to Fig. 2, COD solubility is predicted to increase up to 32% in combined pretreatment of 60 mg H2O2/g TS, 90 °C, and pH = 12, while the highest solubility enhancement from experimental results was 30.4% (19th test). The highest predicted VSS solubility was 55% in combined pretreatment of 60 mg H2O2/g TS, pH = 12, and 90 °C, while the highest amount obtained from experimental results was 50% obtained from the 20th test (30 mg H2O2/g TS, pH = 12, and 90 °C). The addition of hydrogen peroxide to pretreatment demonstrated its function in breaking down the cell walls, as well as the EPS, caused by the release of radicals (hydroxyl radicals, hydroperoxyl radicals), converting organic matter to soluble phase [14].

Fig. 1
figure1

Normal plots of residuals for a COD solubilization b increase of protein

Fig. 2
figure2

Contour and 3D plots for COD solubilization at different concentration of H2O2a 0 b 30 and c 60 mg/g TS

Fig. 3
figure3

Contour and 3D plots for Increase of protein at different concentration of H2O2a 0 b 30 and c 60 mg/g TS

Daily biogas production

As shown in Figs. 4 and 5, the highest daily biogas production was obtained between third and fifth days through the bioreactors. During the first days of the digestion process (Additional file 1: Table S2), the amount of biogas production in the control bioreactor was higher than most of the pre-treated bioreactors. This can be either attributed to the presence of inhibitory factors of the pretreatment or due to the high organic loading available to anaerobic organisms and excessive volatile fatty acid [28].

Fig. 4
figure4

Daily specific biogas production

Fig. 5
figure5

Effect of pretreatments on cumulative methane production. Error bars represent standard errors gained from triplicate measurements

Cumulative methane production

The amount of methane production from different bioreactors was measured regularly during the anaerobic digestion process (Additional file 1: Table S3). For normalizing the data, the produced methane (mL) was divided by the added volatile solids (gram) to each bioreactor. The effects of different pretreatment types on the cumulative yield of biogas production are shown in Table 3. The amount of cumulative methane yield was considerably enhanced when combined pretreatment methods were used. The highest enhancement in methane production (97.77%), compared to the control, was obtained when the combination of A2 + B2 + C1 pretreatments was employed. This is 30.89% higher than the highest increase achieved from the bioreactors with dual treatments (A2 + C2), corroborating the effectiveness of triple pretreatment compared to individual and dual pretreatments. As in previous studies [13, 25, 29], the methane enhancement considering only the individual pretreatment used in this study was between 10 and 30%. In this study, the methane increase from individual pretreatment was between 14% in C2 and 33% in A2. Methane enhancement from dual pretreatments was between 28 and 66%, while in previous studies, it was around 20 to 70% [12, 24].

Analysing the results of cumulative biogas production in Table 3 using RSM, a quadratic model with R2 > 0.98 and p-value< 0.0001 was suggested (Additional file 1: Table S1). By eliminating unacceptable terms and incorporating acceptable terms, the following equation was achieved:

$$ \mathrm{Increase}\ \mathrm{MP}\ \left(\%\right)=\hbox{-} 39.897\hbox{-} 1.798\times \mathrm{A}+8.408\times \mathrm{B}+0.678\times \mathrm{C}+0.005\times \mathrm{A}\times \mathrm{C}+0.0181\times {\mathrm{A}}^2\hbox{-} 0.006\times {\mathrm{C}}^2 $$
(4)

Figure 6 shows contour and 3D graphs related to the increase of cumulative methane production in different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. According to these diagrams, the highest percentage of cumulative methane production is about 115%, which abstained from the bioreactors pre-treated with 90 °C, pH = 12, and 60 mg H2O2/g TS. It is important to note that the highest increase in cumulative biogas production, which was 98%, was observed in the 20th test.

Fig. 6
figure6

Contour and 3D plots for MP at different concentration of H2O2a 0 b 30 and c 60 mg/g TS

Optimum pretreatment condition

A scenario was written for achieving the optimum condition, whereby temperature, pH, and H2O2 were minimized and the methane production, sCOD, soluble protein, and soluble polysaccharide were maximized. In the scenario, methane production was allocated the highest importance factor (Table 4). The best-suggested desirability was 0.673. Desirability is an objective function that varies from zero outside the range to one in the goal. Numerical optimization finds a point that maximizes utility performance. The characteristics of a goal may be changed by adjusting the weight or importance. For several responses and factors, all goals fall into one desirable function [30]. Table 4 shows the information pertaining to the optimization process. Another test with the suggested inputs was carried out for verifying the predicted phenomena in the model, in which the methane enhancement of 71% was achieved in the pre-treated bioreactor (Table 5). The difference achieved can be attributed to different sludge characterizations in the verification test. Despite the important results this study represents, applying new systems to anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge entails precise economic and feasibility assessments. Thus, in prospective studies, economic assessments for full-scale application of the pretreatments are crucial, in addition to investigating possible side-effects of the pretreatments on microbial communities and behavior in long-term exposure.

Table 4 Constraints of optimum condition
Table 5 Predicted and actual observation data at the achieved optimum pretreatment

Discussion

The main objective of this research was to investigate the effect of combined and individual thermal, alkaline, and hydrogen peroxide pretreatment of waste activated sludge on anaerobic digestion efficiency.

The significant increase of COD solubility can be attributed to the breakdown of cellular and microbial walls and the release of organic materials such as polysaccharides and proteins to the soluble phase [31, 32]. All three input variables of temperature, pH, and H2O2 concentration individually affected the COD solubility significantly, whose p-values were less than < 0.0001. For determining the effects of interactions, the term A × B had a positive effect with p-value< 0.05 and appropriate F-value, but the effect of C × B and C × A was insignificant with p-value> 0.1 and the very low and inappropriate F-value, so they were deleted. For the second-order equation, A2, B2, and C2 had significant effects (p-value< 0.05). Also, according to ANOVA table (Additional file 1: Table S1), the model is very suitable because of the lack of fit p-value and fit F-value. Organic matter is generally divided into two parts: biodegradable organic matter, which is consumed by microbial community, and nonbiodegradable organic matter, which is not decomposed by organisms. Protein and polysaccharide, the two readily biodegradable components of COD, account for around 60% of organisms constituents in sludge [3]. Therefore, enhancement of soluble protein and polysaccharide means that a higher amount of nutrients is available to the anaerobic organisms. The increase in amount of soluble protein was considerably higher than that of soluble polysaccharide after treatments can be attributed to a higher proportion of protein in organisms constituents (around 50%) [3]. Thus, the pretreatments probably disrupted cell walls and EPS in waste activated sludge due to their biocidal effect, which affects protein much more than polysaccharide. This agrees with previous studies, in which a similar trend is observed [12, 33]. All three input variables, with p-value< 0.05, had a significant effect on the model, while the effect of the input parameters on each other will be ignored due to p-value> 0.05. Meanwhile, second-order semigroups of input parameters, due to p-value < 0.05 and high F-value, could have a positive effect on protein changes (Additional file 1: Table S1).

The enhanced methane is of paramount importance because not only does it enhance renewable energy generation in wastewater treatment plants, but it also reduces methane emission to the atmosphere, as a major greenhouse gas emission [34]. According to ANOVA table (Additional file 1: Table S1), all three input variables significantly affect methane production, yet their interactions did not affect the methane production substantially. The second-order effects of the terms A2 and C2 had a particular effect on the increase of methane production with p-value< 0.05, while B2 was eliminated from the model with p-value> 0.1.

Conclusion

This study investigated the possibility of enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with different pretreatments. It was revealed that the triple pretreatment of waste activated sludge with heat, alkalinity, and hydrogen peroxide increases soluble fractions of organic matter considerably more than dual and individual pretreatments. This led to significantly higher daily biogas and methane production from the anaerobic digestion, as a higher amount of biodegradable organic matter was available to the anaerobic microbial community. In addition, the effect of input variables and their interactions on methane production were analyzed with response surface methodology and optimized input variables were suggested in the end. Furthermore, harnessing a higher amount of methane in the anaerobic digestion stage decreases methane emission to the atmosphere in dewatering and landfilling stages and enhance the quality of digested sludge, bringing about environmentally friendly and economically attractive sewage sludge treatment process.

Methods

Statisical analyses and DOE

RSM was used to evaluate the independent, interactive, and quadratic input parameters (temperature, pH, and hydrogen peroxide concentration). The I-optimal method was also used for finding optimum points for the highest methane production and organic matter solubilization. In mixture experiments, the proportions of the components of a mixture are the studied factors. The special nature of the factors makes special kinds of regression models necessary and special kinds of experimental designs. Although mixture experiments usually are to foresee the response(s) for all potential formulations of the mixture and to recognize optimal amounts for each of the ingredients, little research has been done regarding their I-optimal design. That I-optimal designs decreases the average variance of prediction and, consequently, looks more suitable for mixture experiments than the commonly used D-optimal designs, focusing on an exact model estimation rather than exact predictions. Also, the I-optimal method gives the ability to consider all relevant points in the desired range regardless of the intermediate data, with three specific points [30].

Design-Expert® software (version 11.0.5.0) was used for statistical analysis and to find the optimal answer. The three considered factors and their interactions were analyzed using the ANOVA table. To determine the significance of differences in the parameters studied, one-way factor Analysis of Variance ANOVA was used with significance levels of p < 0.05. Data analysis and graph processing were carried out with Microsoft Excel software (2010).

Pretreatment methods

The different types of pretreatment methods such as thermal, alkaline and hydrogen peroxide pretreatments were applied individually and in combination with the experimental design shown in Table 3, in accordance with the previous studies as well as their performance. Thermal pretreatment was performed for 5 h in a warm water bath that was set at two temperatures of 75 °C and 90 °C. For this purpose, 1-l sealed glasses containing activated sludge were used. For alkaline pretreatment, since the pH of the primary activated sludge is about 7, 1 N NaOH solution, which represents a high impact alkalinity, as well as a reasonable price, was used to increase the pH of the activated sludge. Thus, by adding a sufficient amount of the solution to the activated sludge which was filled in 1-l glasses, the pH of the containers was adjusted to 8, 10 and 12. After adjusting the desired pH, each container was placed on the shaker at 150 rpm for a 24 h residence time to keep the sludge uniform over the retention time. In pretreatment with hydrogen peroxide 30% (w/w) merck, values of 30 and 60 mg of H2O2/g TS were added to the activated sludge in the 1-l glasses. Then, the glasses, which contain the specific amounts of hydrogen peroxide, were placed on a shaker at the 150 rpm for 24 h to keep the sludge uniform over the retention time. Also, in combined pretreatments, the pretreatments were performed in a specific order in accordance with what was done for the single pretreatment.

Anaerobic digestion

The designed biochemical methane potential test consisted of a 1-l glass reactor containing 600 ml of mixed primary and pre-treated waste activated sludge with a 70%:30% (w/w). The same ratio between primary and waste activated sludge is considered in the South Tehran wastewater treatment plant. Liquid displacement method was used for measuring the volume of biogas production [35]. Strict anaerobic conditions were provided for better organism performance. The reactors were kept in a mesophilic environment at 37 °C, using a hot water bath heated by automatic heaters. During anaerobic digestion, the mixture was stirred at 100 rpm using magnetic stirrers for retaining uniform temperature and nutrient distribution. All measurements were carried out in triplicate with standard error as dispersion measure. Anaerobic digestion process continued for 30 days when biogas production was negligible.

Analytical method

Chemical oxygen demand (COD), total solid (TS), total suspended solid (TSS), volatile solid (VS), and volatile suspended solid (VSS) were measured according to standard methods for examinations of water and wastewater [36]. The COD and VSS solubility after pretreatment were obtained through the following equation:

$$ \mathrm{COD}\ \mathrm{solubilization}=\frac{{\mathrm{sCOD}}_{\mathrm{t}}-{\mathrm{sCOD}}_0}{{\mathrm{TCOD}}_0}\times 100 $$
(5)
$$ \mathrm{VSS}\ \mathrm{solubilization}=\frac{{\mathrm{VSS}}_0-{\mathrm{VSS}}_{\mathrm{t}}}{{\mathrm{TSS}}_0}\times 100 $$
(6)

Where t represents the value after pretreatment and 0 indicates the initial state.

To separate soluble solids from suspensions, centrifuges were used at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 30 min, and filters with a porosity of 0.45 μm were used. Soluble proteins were analyzed with Folin Phenol in accordance with Lowry’s study [37], and soluble polysaccharides were analyzed with phenol and sulfuric acid based on the Dubois study [38]. The percentage of methane was measured using gas chromatography (GC) with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) at 100 °C and an oven at 60 °C. For the tests, 1 mL of the samples were injected into the GC device.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

EPS:

Extracellular polymeric substance

RSM:

Response surface methodology

PS:

Primary sludge

WAS:

Waste active sludge

TCOD:

Total chemical oxygen demand

sCOD:

Soluble chemical oxygen demand

TS:

Total solid

VS:

Volatile solid

TSS:

Total suspended solid

VSS:

Volatile suspended solid

MP:

Methane production

GC:

Gas chromatography

TCD:

Thermal conductivity detector

References

  1. 1.

    Alemán-Nava GS, Casiano-Flores VH, Cárdenas-Chávez DL, Díaz-Chavez R, Scarlat N, Mahlknecht J, Dallemand J-F, Parra R. Renewable energy research progress in Mexico: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;32:140–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Taherdanak M, Zilouei H. Improving biogas production from wheat plant using alkaline pretreatment. Fuel. 2014;115:714–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pilli S, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. Overview of Fenton pretreatment of sludge aiming to enhance anaerobic digestion. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2015;14(3):453–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kim J, Yu Y, Lee C. Thermo-alkaline pretreatment of waste activated sludge at low-temperatures: effects on sludge disintegration, methane production, and methanogen community structure. Bioresour Technol. 2013;144:194–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Grando RL, de Souza Antune AM, Da Fonseca FV, Sánchez A, Barrena R, Font X. Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: a European evaluation of research and development. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;80:44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kim J, Park C, Kim T-H, Lee M, Kim S, Kim S-W, Lee J. Effects of various pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. J Biosci Bioeng. 2003;95(3):271–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2008;34(6):755–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vlyssides A, Karlis P. Thermal-alkaline solubilization of waste activated sludge as a pretreatment stage for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2004;91(2):201–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhen G, Lu X, Li Y-Y, Zhao Y. Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy. 2014;128:93–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ariunbaatar J, Panico A, Esposito G, Pirozzi F, Lens PN. Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste. Appl Energy. 2014;123:143–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yan Y, Feng L, Zhang C, Wisniewski C, Zhou Q. Ultrasonic enhancement of waste activated sludge hydrolysis and volatile fatty acids accumulation at pH 10.0. Water Res. 2010;44(11):3329–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hallaji SM, Torabian A, Aminzadeh B, Zahedi S, Eshtiaghi N. Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sewage mixed sludge using free nitrous acid and Fenton pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11(1):233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xu J, Yuan H, Lin J. Evaluation of thermal, thermal-alkaline, alkaline and electrochemical pretreatments on sludge to enhance anaerobic biogas production. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014;45(5):2531–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Feki E, Khoufi S, Loukil S, Sayadi S. Improvement of anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge by using H 2 O 2 oxidation, electrolysis, electro-oxidation and thermo-alkaline pretreatments. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(19):14717–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Carrere H, Antonopoulou G, Affes R, Passos F, Battimelli A, Lyberatos G, Ferrer I. Review of feedstock pretreatment strategies for improved anaerobic digestion: from lab-scale research to full-scale application. Bioresour Technol. 2016;199:386–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li C, Wang X, Zhang G, Yu G, Lin J, Wang Y. Hydrothermal and alkaline hydrothermal pretreatments plus anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge for dewatering and biogas production: bench-scale research and pilot-scale verification. Water Res. 2017;117:49–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kondusamy D, Kalamdhad AS. Pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of food waste for high rate methane production–a review. J Env Chem Eng. 2014;2(3):1821–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jiang G, Yuan Z. Synergistic inactivation of anaerobic wastewater biofilm by free nitrous acid and hydrogen peroxide. J Hazard Mater. 2013;250:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    King P, Anderson V, Edwards J, Gustafson G, Plumb R, Suggs J. A stable solid that generates hydroxyl radical upon dissolution in aqueous solutions: reaction with proteins and nucleic acid. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(13):5430–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lobachev VL, Rudakov ES. The chemistry of peroxynitrite. Reaction mechanisms and kinetics. Russ Chem Rev. 2006;75(5):375–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Neyens E, Baeyens J, Dewil R. Advanced sludge treatment affects extracellular polymeric substances to improve activated sludge dewatering. J Hazard Mater. 2004;106(2–3):83–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rozendal RA, Leone E, Keller J, Rabaey K. Efficient hydrogen peroxide generation from organic matter in a bioelectrochemical system. Electrochem Commun. 2009;11(9):1752–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang T, Wang Q, Ye L, Batstone D, Yuan Z. Combined free nitrous acid and hydrogen peroxide pretreatment of waste activated sludge enhances methane production via organic molecule breakdown. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16631.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nazari L, Yuan Z, Santoro D, Sarathy S, Ho D, Batstone D, Xu CC, Ray MB. Low-temperature thermal pretreatment of municipal wastewater sludge: process optimization and effects on solubilization and anaerobic degradation. Water Res. 2017;113:111–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ennouri H, Miladi B, Diaz SZ, Güelfo LAF, Solera R, Hamdi M, Bouallagui H. Effect of thermal pretreatment on the biogas production and microbial communities balance during anaerobic digestion of urban and industrial waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2016;214:184–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rani RU, Kumar SA, Kaliappan S, Yeom I-T, Banu JR. Low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment of dairy waste activated sludge for anaerobic digestion process. Bioresour Technol. 2012;103(1):415–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang Q, Jiang G, Ye L, Yuan Z. Enhancing methane production from waste activated sludge using combined free nitrous acid and heat pretreatment. Water Res. 2014;63:71–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zahedi S. Energy efficiency: importance of indigenous microorganisms contained in the municipal solid wastes. Waste Manag. 2018;78:763–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wei W, Zhou X, Xie GJ, Duan H, Wang Q. A novel free ammonia based pretreatment technology to enhance anaerobic methane production from primary sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(10):2245–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Goos P, Jones B, Syafitri U. I-optimal design of mixture experiments. J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(514):899–911.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dhar BR, Nakhla G, Ray MB. Techno-economic evaluation of ultrasound and thermal pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion of municipal waste activated sludge. Waste Manag. 2012;32(3):542–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Appels L, Degrève J, Van der Bruggen B, Van Impe J, Dewil R. Influence of low temperature thermal pretreatment on sludge solubilisation, heavy metal release and anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(15):5743–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zahedi S, Icaran P, Yuan Z, Pijuan M. Enhancing sludge biodegradability through free nitrous acid pretreatment at low exposure time. Chem Eng J. 2017;321:139–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pilli S, More T, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. Fenton pretreatment of secondary sludge to enhance anaerobic digestion: energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions. Chem Eng J. 2016;283:285–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Walker M, Zhang Y, Heaven S, Banks C. Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(24):6339–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Apha A. WPCF, standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers P, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28(3):350–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS, BA, RK and SMH originated and planned the idea and experiments. SS, and SMH carried out the experiments. SS planned and carried out the simulations. BA, SMH and RK guided SS for better design and probable drawbacks. SS, SMH, BA and RK contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors provided critical feedback and assisted form the research, analysis and manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnoush Aminzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

ANOVA for Quadratic model of Increase MP, COD and VSS solubilization and Protein. Table S2. Daily biogas production (mL/g VS added) (average of triplicate tests). Table S3. Cumulative methane production (mL/g VS added).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siami, S., Aminzadeh, B., Karimi, R. et al. Process optimization and effect of thermal, alkaline, H2O2 oxidation and combination pretreatment of sewage sludge on solubilization and anaerobic digestion. BMC Biotechnol 20, 21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-020-00614-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anaerobic digestion
  • Sewage sludge
  • Pretreatment
  • Methane production
  • Response surface methodology