Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology article
  • Open Access

pXST, a novel vector for TA cloning and blunt-end cloning

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Biotechnology201818:44

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-018-0456-8

  • Received: 26 November 2017
  • Accepted: 9 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

With the rapid development of sequencing technologies, increasing amount of genomic information has been accumulated. To clone genes for further functional studies in large scale, a cheap, fast and efficient cloning vector is desired.

Results

A bifunctional vector pXST has been constructed. The pXST vector harbors a XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette and restriction site SmaI. Digestion the vector with XcmI generates a single thymidine (T) overhang at 3′ end which facilitates TA cloning, and SmaI gives blunt end that enables the blunt-end ligation. Multiple products with various sizes were amplified from cassava genome by PCR and each PCR fragment was separately cloned into a pXST using TA cloning and blunt-end ligation methods. In general, the TA cloning gave higher transformation efficiency than blunt-end ligation for inserts with all different sizes, and the transformation efficiency significantly decreased with increasing size of inserts. The highest transformation efficiency (8.6 × 106 transformants/μg) was achieved when cloning 517 bp DNA fragment using TA cloning. No significant difference observed in the positive cloning efficiency between two ligation methods and the positive cloning efficiency could reach as high as 100% especially for small inserts (e.g. 517 and 957 base pairs).

Conclusions

We describe a simple and general method to construct a novel pXST vector. We confirm the feasibility of using pXST vector to clone PCR products amplified from cassava genome with both TA cloning and blunt-end ligation methods. The pXST plasmid has several advantages over many currently available vectors in that (1) it possesses XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette and restriction site SmaI, enabling both TA cloning and blunt-end ligation. (2) it allows direct selection of positive recombinant plasmids in Escherichia coli through disruption of the ccdB gene. (3) it improves positive cloning efficiency by introducing the ccdB gene, reducing the possibility of self-ligation from insufficient digested plasmids. (4) it could be used by high performance and cost-effective cloning methods. Therefore, this dual function vector would offer flexible alternatives for gene cloning experiments to researchers.

Keywords

  • PCR product
  • Cloning
  • T-vector
  • Blunt-end ligation
  • High efficiency

Background

Amplification and cloning of genes are fundamental techniques in the field of molecular biology. DNA amplicons by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), require to be introduced into the plasmids for propagation, preservation, sequencing before transferred into expression vectors for the following functional characterization. The key step for cloning is to fuse the target DNA fragments into the linearized vectors, and many approaches have been developed to achieve this goal, including “TA” cloning, “blunt-end” cloning, TOPO, Gateway, etc. [15].

Generally, the currently available cloning methods can be divided into two categories, according to the critical enzymes catalyzed in the system: ligase-free methods and ligase-dependent methods. Most ligase-free methods achieved the DNA recombinant through DNA pairing and homologous recombination, which requires the whole corresponding systems, including the specific primers and enzymes, such as recombinase or topoisomerase I, thus, increasing the cost and complexity of the methods [6, 7]. Due to the high cost and complicated protocol, hardly can commercially available ligase-free methods meet the requirement for large scale cloning and be used in most laboratories. Comparatively, the ligase-dependent methods are more widely and robustly used, which include cohesive-end ligation, blunt-end ligation and TA cloning [8]. The cohesive-end ligation links the target DNA fragments (inserts) to plasmids through complementary between the inserts and plasmid vectors, resulting in high recombinant efficiency. However, chances are high that the inserts contain multiple cloning sites, increasing the difficulties to choose the appropriate restriction enzymes. The blunt-end cloning walks around such problems by avoiding the digestion of the insert fragments. However new problems arise for the blunt-end cloning because the blunt ends of vectors could be self-ligated, decreasing the available vectors for ligating inserts. TA cloning seems to solve the problem of self-ligation by using the benefit of Taq polymerase. The Taq polymerase could preferentially add a single adenosine (dA) to the 3′-end of a PCR product which is complimentary to the vectors with a single thymine overhang at 3′-end (T-vector) [9]. Therefore, TA cloning is the simplest and most efficient approach for cloning of PCR products, because the method avoid the requirement of digesting the insert fragments and also the self-ligation problem of vectors.

After the transformation of the recombinant plasmids, an efficient selection method is required for the screening of positive colonies that contain the target inserts. Different strategies, including the white-blue screening, fluorescent protein-based method and introduction of antibiotic resistance and lethal genes, have been described [1013]. The control of cell death B (ccdB) gene encodes a potent inhibitor of gyrase that induces DNA breaking and cell death in the absence of the antidote gene CcdA [14]. Such unique characteristic facilitates the positive selection of the recombinant plasmids, because only when the target DNA fragments were inserted into vectors that disrupt the ccdB genes, the cells could survive [15, 16].

In this study, we have constructed a novel cloning vector pXST by introducing the XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette and restriction enzyme site SmaI into the plasmid pMD-19 T. The pXST could be used by both TA cloning and blunt end ligation, providing more options when selection of cloning methods. In addition, introduction of ccdB genes allows the direct selection of positive colonies and also reduces the self-ligation of blunt-end vectors. Furthermore, the system to catalyze the ligation is cheap and fast. Therefore, this plasmid is expected to be widely used as a high performance and cost effective cloning vector.

Methods

Materials

Plasmids pMD-19 T (simple) (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and pDONOR221 (Invitrogen Corp., CA, USA) served as the backbone and ccdB donor vector, respectively. Escherichia coli DB3.1 (Invitrogen) was employed to hold the destination vector. E.coli strain DH5α was used for the plasmid transformation and cloning. The LA Taq polymerase with GC buffer (TaKaRa) and Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) was employed to DNA fragment amplification. The PCR products purification and plasmid extraction kits were bought from Omega (Omega, Doraville, USA). T4 ligase and restriction enzyme XcmI and SmaI were purchased from Thermo Fisher.

Primer design

All the primers used in this study were designed by the program Oligo7. The detail information of sequences and corresponding product lengths are listed in Table 1. Two XcmI restriction sites were created by adding sequence (5’ CCAATACTTGTATGG 3′) to the 5′ ends of primers to generate the XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette.
Table 1

Primer sequences used in this study

Name

Primer Sequences

Product size (bp)

ccdB-F

CCAATACTTGTATGGgcagactggctgtgtataaggg

487

ccdB-R

CCAATACTTGTATGGctccggtctggtaagcacaac

 

ccdBseq-F

TCTTTTGCTGACGAGAACAG

210 + (insert)

ccdBseq-R

CTTTCATCCCCGATATGCAC

 

M13F

GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT

126 + (insert)

M13R

CAGGAAACAGCTATGACC

 

F1

GGCACAGACAAGATTGAACC

517

R1

AACACTGCAATTCCACGATG

 

F2

TCCCGGTTGATTCTTTACGTCT

957

R2

CGCAGTTTCCCATTTGTAATCGTC

 

F3

TCCCGGTTGATTCTTTACGTCT

1515

R3

CAATCTTGTCTGTGCCCCGAA

 

F4

CTTTGCTTCCTATACCACGAGA

2343

R4

ACTAACACTGCAATTCCACGAT

 

The underlined sequence is the specific restriction site for XcmI and the small letters is the complementary sequence for the ccdB amplification

Obtaining the ccdB gene

The pDONR221 vector was used as a template for the ccdB amplification using ccdB-F and ccdB-R primers. The PCR reaction was performed in 50 μL mixture consisted of 1 ng pDONR221 vector, 0.4 μM of each primer, 0.5 μL TaKaRa LA Taq, 2.5 mM dNTP mixture, 10 × LA PCR Buffer I (Mg2+ Plus) and an appropriate amount of ddH2O. The thermic profile was set as follows: initial denaturing step at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 56°Cand 30 s extension step at 72 °C, followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was then purified by The E.Z.N.A.® Gel Extraction Kit (Omega, cat. no. D2501) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

pXST construction

The purified product was cloned into the pMD19-T (simple) vector to yield the pXST vector and the ligation was performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The ligation mixture was used to transform competent E. coli DB3.1 cells. After the overnight culture, several clones were selected to detect the orientation of the inserted ccdB fragment using the ccdB-F and M13R primers. The positive clone was cultured in liquid LB medium for overnight. Finally, the pXST plasmid was extracted using the Plasmid Mini Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, USA). The plasmid was digested with SmaI to generate the blunt-end fragments and XcmI to create T-vector.

The desired fragments were identified by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified by the Gel Extraction Kit (Omega). The pXST lethality was confirmed by transforming the vector into DB3.1 and DH5α competent cells simultaneously and observing the bacteria growth.

pXST transformation efficiency and positive cloning efficiency

The DNA fragments of different lengths were amplified from the cassava MeSTP7 genomic sequence (Phytozome accession: Manes.03G180400). All fragments were amplified with or without 3′ terminal A by using the LA taq and Phusion DNA polymerase respectively. After the PCR products were purified, the ligation reaction was performed in 10 μL volume using 50 ng linearized pXST, 50 ng purified fragment, 5 U T4 DNA ligase, 1 μL 10 × T4 buffer and 6 μL ddH2O. The mixture was incubated at 22 °C for 1 h and then added into 100 μL E. coli DH5α chemically competent cells, followed by incubation on ice for 30 min and heat shock at 42 °C for 50 s. All suspended cells were plated on a Luria-Bertani (LB)-agar plate with 100 μg/ml ampicillin. After an overnight culture the colonies were counted to calculate the transformation efficiency by using Calculator (http://www.sciencegateway.org/tools/transform.htm) and analyzed by colony PCR to examine the cloning efficiency. The mean values and standard deviation (SD) were calculated from the measurements of three independent experiments.

Results

The construction of the pXST cloning vector

The pXST vector was constructed followed the flow chart illustrated in Fig. 1. The XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette was amplified by using the pDONR221 vector as a template. The amplification was catalyzed by the polymerase TaKaRa LA Taq which could add an extra adenine to the 3′ end of the PCR fragments. The PCR products were examined by 1% agarose gel. As expected, and the electrophoresis showed a clear strap around the size of 500 bp. The target band was purified and then introduced into the commercial pMD19-T (simple) vector. The orientation of the insert fragment ccdB gene was examined by performing colony PCR using the primer pairs, ccdB-F and M13R. After the colony PCR, the products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2a). There were 6 out of 10 colonies showed a clear band, suggesting that the plasmids showing PCR amplification contain the ccdB gene with the expected orientation (pXST) whereas the rest four without amplification have the ccdB gene in the reverse orientation (pXST-R). The pXST and pXST-R were verified by sequencing. To examine if insertion of ccdB gene in the reverse orientation would also lead to cell lethality, both pXST and pXST-R were transformed into E. coli DB3.1 (ccdB resistant strain) and DH5α, and the transformants were grew on LB plates with ampicillin selection independently. As showed in Fig. 3, DH5α containing pXST can’t grow on the LB-Amp plates with or without adding IPTG (Fig. 3b, c), suggesting that ccdB gene can be well expressed driven by lac promoter even at basal level (without IPTG induction), and its expression caused the lethality. Whereas, DH5α with pXST-R can grow on the LB-Amp plate with adding IPTG (Fig. 3d), which indicated that the insertion of ccdB in the reverse orientation cannot be expressed, therefore, cannot result in lethality. These results also suggested that the ccdB gene fragment in pXST and pXST-R does not contain its own promoter, and its expression requires to be the driven of lac promoter. Together, the ccdB gene in the pXST is expressed under the control of lac promoter and caused cell death in DH5α but not in DB3.1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Diagrammatic presentation of the pXST construction. XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette is derived from the pDNOR221 vector. The recognition sites for XcmI and SmaI were indicated as italic. The lethal gene ccdB was marked in red color

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Gel electrophoretogram of colony PCR and restriction. a Lane 1–10 shows the results of colony PCR from ten random clones, which were selected for the detecting the insert orientation of XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette. The light bands indicate positive clones, in which the ccdB coding sequence is in the downstream of LAC promoter. b Plasmid vector pXST was digested with SmaI (lane 1) and XcmI (lane 2–3)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The lethality testing of pXST and pXST-R. a Vector pXST was transformed into E.coli DB3.1 strain. DH5α strain harboring pXST was grown on the plates with (b) or without (c) IPTG respectively. d Vector pXST-R was transformed into DH5α and the strain survived in LB-plate with IPTG

pXST transformation efficiency regarding PCR products

Next, we continued to examine the feasibility of using pXST as T-vector and blunt-end vector for conducting both TA cloning and blunt-end ligation. The plasmid pXST was digested with SmaI to form a blunt-end vector and with XcmI to generate the T-vector. The digested products were examined by electrophoresis, which showed the bands with the expected sizes (Fig. 2a). Target DNA fragments with different sizes (517, 957, 1515 and 2343 bp, respectively) were amplified from the cassava MeSTP7 genomic regions. In the PCR reaction, two different DNA polymerase was used, and one could add an additional adenine overhang at 3′ end of the PCR products, whereas the other could not. The two kinds of PCR products were cloned into T-vector and blunt end vectors generated from the pXST vector respectively. The transformation efficiency (TE) for different sized inserts were calculated for both TA cloning and blunt end ligation methods. The results showed that the TA cloning generally gives higher TE compared to blunt end ligation for the insert fragments with all different sizes, and the efficiency decreased with the insert size increased (Fig. 4). The highest TE (8.6 × 106 transformants/μg) was obtained when the insert was 517 bp in length. In addition, the positive cloning efficiency was calculated. For each condition, twenty random colonies were chosen to examine the positive insertion by PCR. The positive cloning efficiency was calculated by the ratio of recombinant versus the total number of selected colonies. Statistical analysis showed that the positive cloning efficiency for TA cloning and blunt-end cloning efficiency was both 100% for small inserts (517 bp and 957 bp) (Fig. 5). For the larger inserts, such as 1515 bp and 2343 bp PCR products, the positive cloning efficiency was decreased to 95%. Mean values did not show statistically significant differences between the two ligation methods. These findings highlighted the fact that the pXST cloning system exhibited a strict selection of positive colonies.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Bacteria transformation efficiency for different sized inserts. Histograms represent average values and error bars mean standard deviations for three individual experiments

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

The positive colony efficiency of pXST for different sized inserts. Cloning efficiency is calculated as the ratio of the number of PCR positive colonies to twenty random transformants

Discussion

Though many commercial kits for DNA cloning are available, the high cost makes it difficult to meet the growing demands for gene cloning in large-scale. In the past years, various strategies have been reported to construct the homemade cloning vectors in laboratories. Most vectors are designed as T-vectors or blunt-end vectors because of theirs convenience in practice.

T-vector could be constructed by either adding a single thymidine residue to a blunt-end plasmid by transferase [17] or by restriction endonucleases, such as HpbI [18], AbdI [19], BfuI [20] and XcmI [21], which can recognize restriction sites containing variables nucleotide sequences, which provide a feasible way to construct T-vectors. Among above enzymes, XcmI has been widely used, because pUC-based plasmids which are the most popular vector series do not contain the restriction sites recognized by XcmI. Therefore, addition of XcmI site to the pUC-based vectors would not disrupt their original features. However, T-vectors generated from restriction digestion would have self-ligation problems come from insufficiently digestion, especially when the size of the fragment between the two XcmI is too small [21]. Therefore, inserting a relative large DNA fragment within the two XcmI sites seems to be an alternative choice to solve the problems mentioned above when designing the vector [22]. In the present study, we constructed the XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette with length of 487-bp which is large enough for the XcmI digestion. Furthermore, the ccdB lethality can guarantee that the transformants containing self-ligation vector would not survive, adding an additional layer of selection.

The blunt-end vectors have been frequently used for cloning DNA fragments since the DNA polymerases used to amplify DNA fragments have the high-fidelity due to the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity and generate blunt-end fragments after the PCR reactions. Blunt-end vectors can be generated by PCR or enzymes digestion. EcoRV and SmaI are the most popular endonucleases utilized to digest vector and produce blunt-end. Since the linearized vector and DNA fragment are both blunt-end in the T4 ligation reaction mixture, it causes the problem of vector self-ligation, reducing the possibility of successful recombinant and bringing great inconvenience in the following positive colonies screening. Although the dephosphorylation can be performed to minimize self-ligation of the linearized vector [23], it is still not an ideal solution as it is time consuming and costly. In this study, we introduced the SmaI site within the ccdB gene. Therefore, if the vectors are self-ligated, the expression of ccdB genes will result in cell death, reducing the possibility of the colony containing the self-ligated empty vectors, thus increasing the positive colony efficiency.

The pXST vector transformation efficiency regarding different sized PCR products was calculated by two ligation methods, TA cloning and blunt-end cloning. Generally, transformation efficiency is determined by a variety of factors, including the quality of competent cells, the molar ratio between the insert fragment and plasmid, and the ligation efficiency of the reaction mixture, etc. [24]. As high efficiency of transformation is not critical for cloning and subcloning purposes, a simple strategy that that can meet the minimum requirement for transformation without complex computation for the ratio of vector versus insert is more desirable. In this study, the transformation efficiency ranging from 3.0 × 106 to 8.3 × 106 transformants/μg plasmid, was sufficient to meet the requirements of gene cloning and comparable to pELMO, which is a pUC18-based vector for TA cloning [25]. In addition, such efficiency could be reached even with equivalent amount of insert and pXST (50 ng for each, 1:1 ratio), increasing the convenience for practical experiments. The transformation efficiency of TA cloning is much higher than that of blunt-end ligation, which is due to the fact that T-A complement between the T-vector and the PCR fragment is easier for T4 ligation reaction to catalyze. For an ideal cloning vector, it should have a high positive cloning efficiency in addition to high transformation efficiency. The cloning efficiency of different size fragments between the two ligation methods was also tested in this study. The cloning efficiency was as high as 95% for both methods and there was no significant difference between the two methods. These results also supporting the idea that the introduction of ccdB can reduce the possibility of self-ligation of vector.

Researchers usually require different plasmids to meet cloning requirements. In the present study, we constructed a bifunctianal vector pXST by combining XcmI, SmaI and ccdB genes, which can be digested into linearized T carrier or blunt end vector. The vector pXST utilizes the ccdB gene as a positive selection maker, saving the time in screening the positive colonies. For cloning vectors, they should have characteristics that allow the gene to be easily inserted into or removed. The pXST is designed without redundant cloning sites that would allow researchers to add any desired restriction enzyme sites to facilitate the subclone. In this study, the pXST was just designed for gene cloning, but the XcmI-ccdB-XcmI cassette within the vector, which is proved to be a useful element in vector modification and deserved to be further used in the design of expression vectors. It would be serviceable in the plasmid constructions for various purposes, including gene over-expression, sub-cellular location, protein expression, etc.

Conclusions

In conclusion, a novel cloning vector pXST with high efficiency and low background is constructed in this study. The mechanism is easy to understand, and technique is simple to carry out. It is suitable for any lab to build this dual functional vector in with low cost.

Abbreviations

Amp: 

Ampicillin

ccdB

Control of cell death B

dA: 

Adenosine

IPTG: 

β-D-1-Thiogalactopyranoside

LB: 

Luria–Bertani

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

TE: 

Transformation efficiency

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660412), Core Research Budget of the Non-profit Governmental Research Institution (1630032016008), Funds of the modern agricultural industry technology system (CARS-HNCYH) and the Comprehensive Strength Promotion Plan of College in the Western Regions (M8K3124001001003002).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

L-JL and QL designed the research. QL, H-JD, Y-HW, and ML. performed the experiments. QL, Y-HC, X-LN, K-ML, and L-JL. analyzed the data. All authors contributed to writing this manuscript and approved of its final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China
(2)
Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 570228, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Clark JM. Novel non-templated nucleotide addition reactions catalyzed by procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(20):9677–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranishi F, Okimoto T. Engineered XcmI cassette-containing vector for PCR-based phylogenetic analyses. J Genet. 2004;83(1):33–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu ZG, Schwartz LM. An efficient method for blunt-end ligation of PCR products. BioTechniques. 1992;12(1):28–30.Google Scholar
  4. Wu WY, Gillies AR, Hsii JF, Contreras L, Oak S, Perl MB, Wood DW. Self-cleaving purification tags re-engineered for rapid Topo® cloning. Biotechnol Prog. 2010;26(5):1205–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(2):462–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonsor D, Butz SF, Solomons J, Grant S, Fairlamb IJ, Fogg MJ, Grogan G. Ligation independent cloning (LIC) as a rapid route to families of recombinant biocatalysts from sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4(7):1252–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang Y, Werling U, Edelmann W. SLiCE: a novel bacterial cell extract-based DNA cloning method. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(8):e55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Yao S, Hart DJ, An Y. Recent advances in universal TA cloning methods for use in function studies. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2016;29(11):551–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckert KA, Kunkel TA. DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. Genome Res. 1991;1(1):17–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang J, Xu J, Zhong X, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Li W, Zhang X, Zhen P, Yang X, Chen L. An advanced blue–white screening method for construction of shRNA expression vectors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390(1):97–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kovach ME, Elzer PH, Hill DS, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop RM, Peterson KM. Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene. 1995;166(1):175–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Park HK, Zeng C. Construction of an XcmI-generated T vector bearing green fluorescent protein marker for direct cloning of PCR products. Anal Biochem. 2007;360(1):144–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang B, Zheng F, Quan J, Li X, Liu Y, Sun B, Zhang R, Guo G, Zhang J. A PCR-based technique to construct T-vectors for high-throughput cloning of PCR products. Anal Biochem. 2007;363(2):303–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernard P, Couturier M. Cell killing by the F plasmid CcdB protein involves poisoning of DNA-topoisomerase II complexes. J Mol Biol. 1992;226(3):735–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu C, Nerurkar VR, Yanagihara R, Lu Y. Effective modifications for improved homologous recombination and high-efficiency generation of recombinant adenovirus-based vectors. J Virol Methods. 2008;153(2):120–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mandi N, Kotwal P, Padmanabhan S. Construction of a novel zero background prokaryotic expression vector: potential advantages. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31(12):1905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Holton T, Graham M. A simple and efficient method for direct cloning of PCR products using ddT-tailed vectors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(5):1156.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mead DA, Pey NK, Herrnstadt C, Marcil RA, Smith LM. A universal method for the direct cloning of PCR amplified nucleic acid. Nat Biotechnol. 1991;9(7):657.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeung JU, Cho SK, Shim KS, Ok SH, Lim DS, Shin JS. Construction of two pGEM-7Zf(+) phagemid T-tail vectors using AhdI-restriction endonuclease sites for direct cloning of PCR products. Plasmid. 2002;48:160–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Janner CR, Brito ALP, Moraes LMP, Reis VC, Torres FA. pPCV, a versatile vector for cloning PCR products. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):441.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Jo C, Jo SA. A simple method to construct T-vectors using XcmI cassettes amplified by nonspecific PCR. Plasmid. 2001;45(1):37–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gu J, Ye C. pYEMF, a pUC18-derived XcmI T-vector for efficient cloning of PCR products. Mol Biotechnol. 2011;47(3):229–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovalic D, Kwak J-H, Weisblum B. General method for direct cloning of DNA fragments generated by the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(16):4560.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983;166(4):557–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramos AE, Munoz M, Moreno-Perez DA, Patarroyo MA. pELMO, an optimised in-house cloning vector. AMB Express. 2017;7(1):26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement