Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology article
  • Open Access

Adaptation of the GoldenBraid modular cloning system and creation of a toolkit for the expression of heterologous proteins in yeast mitochondria

  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Biotechnology201717:80

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0393-y

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 12 May 2017
  • Accepted: 30 October 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

There is a need for the development of synthetic biology methods and tools to facilitate rapid and efficient engineering of yeast that accommodates the needs of specific biotechnology projects. In particular, the manipulation of the mitochondrial proteome has interesting potential applications due to its compartmentalized nature. One of these advantages resides in the fact that metalation occurs after protein import into mitochondria, which contains pools of iron, zinc, copper and manganese ions that can be utilized in recombinant metalloprotein metalation reactions. Another advantage is that mitochondria are suitable organelles to host oxygen sensitive proteins as a low oxygen environment is created within the matrix during cellular respiration.

Results

Here we describe the adaptation of a modular cloning system, GoldenBraid2.0, for the integration of assembled transcriptional units into two different sites of the yeast genome, yielding a high expression level. We have also generated a toolkit comprising various promoters, terminators and selection markers that facilitate the generation of multigenic constructs and allow the reconstruction of biosynthetic pathways within Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To facilitate the specific expression of recombinant proteins within the mitochondrial matrix, we have also included in the toolkit an array of mitochondrial targeting signals and tested their efficiency at different growth conditions. As a proof of concept, we show here the integration and expression of 14 bacterial nitrogen fixation (nif) genes, some of which are known to require specific metallocluster cofactors that contribute to their stability yet make these proteins highly sensitive to oxygen. For one of these genes, nifU, we show that optimal production of this protein is achieved through the use of the Su9 mitochondrial targeting pre-sequence and glycerol as a carbon source to sustain aerobic respiration.

Conclusions

We present here an adapted GoldenBraid2.0 system for modular cloning, genome integration and expression of recombinant proteins in yeast. We have produced a toolkit that includes inducible and constitutive promoters, mitochondrial targeting signals, terminators and selection markers to guarantee versatility in the design of recombinant transcriptional units. By testing the efficiency of the system with nitrogenase Nif proteins and different mitochondrial targeting pre-sequences and growth conditions, we have paved the way for future studies addressing the expression of heterologous proteins in yeast mitochondria.

Keywords

  • Synthetic biology
  • GoldenBraid
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Mitochondria

Background

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a single celled yeast commonly used for biotechnological and synthetic biology applications that has the ability to either ferment or respire to grow depending on the available carbon source(s). Using yeast as a chassis for biotechnology is impactful as it serves as a starting point for more complicated engineering projects in higher eukaryotes that share many of its metabolic and cellular characteristics. Several modular cloning methods exist for engineering yeast, such as MoClo-YTK [1] and yeast GoldenGate (yGG) [2]. There is need, however, for the development of novel synthetic biology tools to accommodate the necessities of specific projects.

Mitochondria play a fundamental role in ATP generation through cellular respiration and execute critical biochemical functions for the synthesis of fatty acids, amino acids and nucleotides. Many proteins containing metallocluster cofactors are required for these essential physiological and biochemical processes. Zinc, iron, copper and manganese metal cofactors are required for normal mitochondrial function and are relatively abundant within the matrix [3]. One strategy to benefit from the manipulation of yeast mitochondria is the targeting of recombinant metalloproteins into the organelle. Once imported, these metalloproteins can be properly folded and incorporate their required metal cofactors, taking advantage of the specific metal availability within the matrix.

Another strategy consists of benefitting from the respiratory activity of mitochondria. Respiration is used in many diazotrophic bacteria during the synthesis of enzymes involved in nitrogen fixation. This is hypothesized to decrease oxygen tension on the oxygen-sensitive nitrogenase enzymes─the so-called “respiratory protection” of nitrogenase hypothesis [3]. According to this hypothesis, the respiratory electron transport system performs an O2-scavenging function preventing the diffusion of O2 into the cells, keeping the interior of the cells anoxic even with high ambient O2 concentrations. In fact, the convenience of using yeast mitochondria to host nitrogenase components was recently shown. There have been previous efforts to express nif genes in eukaryotic organisms such as S. cerevisiae [4–8], Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [9] and even plants [10–12]. Frequently, these efforts resulted in producing inactive or nearly inactive nitrogenase enzymes. However, the expression of nifH and nifM in S. cerevisiae mitochondria using mitochondrial targeting was successful in obtaining active enzymes under aerobic growth conditions [13].

In this report we describe the adaptation of a modular cloning method originally designed for plants, GoldenBraid2.0 [14], for S. cerevisiae genome integration and gene expression. It is a modular cloning system that relies on the use of type IIS restriction enzymes for DNA assembly and that generates fully exchangeable genetic elements for multigene engineering, comparable with existing MoClo-YTG and yGG strategies.

We have also generated a synthetic biology toolkit that includes promoters of various strengths, an array of mitochondrial targeting signals, terminators and selection markers to use in the reconstruction of biosynthetic pathways in the mitochondrial matrix of S. cerevisiae. This new method has been tested for several Nif proteins and different growth conditions were compared to obtain optimal results.

Methods

Generation of GoldenBraid plasmids adapted for yeast genome integration

To generate new integration constructs compatible with the GoldenBraid2.0 standard, the backbone of GoldenBraid (GB) vectors pDGB2α1 and pDGB2Ω1 were amplified using primers 1826/1827 and 1827/1828, respectively, and new synthetic GoldenBraid cloning cassettes adapted for S. cerevisiae genome integration were ligated within. These S. cerevisiae-specific synthetic cassettes were synthetized by Genscript and consisted of recombination arms of homology for integration at the YPRCΔ15 or YORWΔ22 solo long terminal repeat (LTR) loci described in [14]. Integration at these loci conferred a high level of expression of a reporter gene using two different promoters (TEF1p and ACT1p). These integrative arms of homology flanked the regular GB module (BsmBI-BsaI-lacZ-BsaI-BsmBI for α1 or BsaI-BsmBI-lacZ-BsmBI-BsaI for Ω1 vectors [15]) and the entire cassette was flanked by I-SceI restriction sites. This resulted in the construction of 4 plasmids, YPRCΔ15α1, YPRCΔ15Ω1, YORWΔ22α1 and YORWΔ22Ω1. Subsequently, the α1 vectors were mutagenized to become α2 and the Ω1 vectors were mutagenized to become Ω2, generating 8 total plasmids (Genscript).

Molecular biology enzymes

Enzymes used for molecular biology were the following: restriction enzymes BsmBI/Esp3I (Fermentas), BsaI and BtgZI (NEB), T4 DNA ligase (Promega), Phusion DNA Polymerase (Agilent) and KAPA2G (KAPA Biosystems).

Domestication of parts

GB parts were amplified by PCR from plasmid or genomic DNA templates with primers designed by using the Domesticator tool of www.GBcloning.org as described in Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Table S2. Domestication of GB parts is the process by which the internal restriction sites BsmBI/Esp3I, BsaI and BtgZI are removed and appropriate 4 nucleotide flanking overhangs are added to provide specificity to the part type. The sequence of each part is listed in Additional file 3: Figure S1. The DNA sequence encoding the 8xHis tag and the codon-optimized versions of the nif genes were synthetized by Genscript or Proteogenix, as described in Additional file 1: Table S1. The protocol used for the domestication reactions consists of adding 40 ng of each DNA patch, 75 ng of pUPD plasmid, 10 units of BsmBI, 3 units of T4 DNA ligase and 1 μL of 10× ligase buffer in a final volume of 10 μL. Reactions were carried out in a thermocycler, 25 cycles of 37 °C 2 min, 16 °C 5 min [15].

Cloning into destination plasmids

After domestication of all GB parts in the universal domesticator plasmid, pUPD, the desired transcriptional units (TUs) were generated in the α1 destination plasmids. The kanMX (G418R) or the hphMX (HygroR) resistance selection markers were digested from pUPD and subcloned into the α2 plasmids. α1-TUs and α2-selection markers were then combined into Ω1 plasmids. The protocol for the TU assembly reaction in α destination plasmids consists on adding 75 ng of each part, 75 ng of the α destination plasmid, 10 units of BsaI, 3 units of T4 DNA ligase and 1 μL of 10× ligase buffer in a final volume of 10 μL. Reactions were carried out in a thermocycler, 25 cycles of 37 °C 2 min, 16 °C 5 min [15]. The protocol for the piling up of the TUs cloned in the two α plasmids into an Ω plasmid consists on adding 75 ng of each α plasmid, 75 ng of the Ω plasmid, 10 units of BsmBI, 3 units of T4 DNA ligase and 1 μL of 10× ligase buffer in a final volume of 10 μL. Reactions were carried out in a thermocycler, 25 cycles of 37 °C 2 min, 16 °C 5 min [15].

Verification of the final constructs was performed by Sanger sequencing using a promoter forward primer, a terminator reverse primer and an internal primer when needed for longer length parts.

Strains and growth media

The S. cerevisiae strains W303–1A (ura3–1; trp1–1; leu2–3112; his3–11; ade2–1; can1–100) (ATCC 208352) and CEN.PK2–1D (ura3–52; trp1–289; leu2–3112; his3Δ 1; MAL2-8C; SUC2) were used as indicated in the text and figures. Cells were grown in YPAU media (1% yeast extract (Conda), 2% bactopeptone (Pronadisa), 0.2 mg/ml adenine sulfate (Formedium) and 0.27 mg/ml uracil (Amresco)) with 2% glucose (Sigma), 2% galactose (Formedium) or 3% glycerol (GPR Rectapur VWR) as described in each case.

S. cerevisiae Transformation

The final plasmids containing the GB-assembled TU constructs were digested with I-SceI (NEB) to generate a linear DNA fragment that was used for S. cerevisiae transformation and genome integration, as described in reference [16].

G418 (200 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Hygromycin B (200μg/ml, Formedium) were used for selection. Transformants were purified by restreaking on YPAUD plates containing 2% glucose and the appropriate antibiotic, and only colonies growing with normal morphology were selected for further experimentation.

Verification of genomic integration was performed for each strain by extracting genomic DNA using the Bust n’ Grab Genomic DNA Isolation Protocol [17] and by carrying out PCR reactions for the YPRC∆15 or YORW∆22 integration loci using primers specific to sequences flanking the integration arms of homology together with internal primers specific to each construct. To confirm integration at the YPRC∆15 locus, we used the 5′ flanking forward primer 1833 and a reverse primer internal to the promoter of the nif transcription unit. To confirm YPRC∆15 3′ integration, we used a kanMX internal forward primer 1551 and 3′ flanking reverse primer 1836. To confirm YORW∆22 5′ integration, we used 5′ flanking forward primer 1829 and a reverse primer internal to the promoter of the nif transcription unit. To confirm YORW∆22 3′ integration, we used a kanMX or hphMX internal forward primer 1551 or 1556 and 3′ flanking reverse primer 1832. Primer sequences are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Preparation of yeast extracts and immunoblotting

Cell pellets corresponding to OD600 5–10 were protein extracted using the alkali extraction protocol described in [18], and samples corresponding to OD600 0.5–1 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting (WB). Monoclonal mouse anti-His primary antibody (Sigma H1029-2ML, 1:5000 dilution) and anti-mouse-HRP secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-2060, 1:10,000 to 1:20,000 dilution), or polyclonal rabbit anti-NifU ([13], 1:5000 dilution), polyclonal rabbit anti-NifS ([13], 1:200 dilution), polyclonal rabbit anti-NifM (1:4000 dilution), and anti-rabbit-HRP secondary antibody (Sigma A0545-1ML, 1:10,000 dilution) were used.

After the immunodetection of proteins, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were stained with Coomassie to determine the total protein loaded and the blotting efficiency, as described in [19].

Representative expression results are shown throughout the manuscript. For every figure, at least two transformant colonies were analyzed for each strain and the results were obtained from at least two biologically independent experiments.

Preparation of mitochondria enriched extracts

The preparation of a crude mitochondrial fraction was performed following the protocol described in [20] with 5 g of cells collected from cultures grown in YPAU media with 2% glucose to a final OD600 of 4–6.

Western blots were carried out using polyclonal rabbit anti-NifU ([13], 1:5000 dilution), monoclonal mouse anti-HSP60 (Novus biologicals, NBP2–34671H, 1:2000 dilution), monoclonal rat anti-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-69,971, 1:1000 dilution), anti-rabbit-HRP secondary antibody (Sigma A0545-1ML, 1:10,000 dilution), anti-mouse-HRP secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-2060, 1:20,000 dilution) and anti-rat-HRP secondary antibody (Amersham NA 935, 1:10,000 dilution).

Glucose determination in culture media

Glucose presence in the media was estimated using a Glucocard G+ meter sensor.

Results

Adaptation of the GoldenBraid system for yeast

We sought to develop a reliable and modular system to integrate TUs of heterologous genes into the genome of S. cerevisiae. To meet this end, we adopted the GoldenBraid2.0 cloning system, a system that was originally developed for plants. GoldenBraid modular cloning plasmids were adapted to integrate by homologous recombination at two different positions of the S. cerevisiae chromosome that have been validated as suitable for heterologous gene expression: YPRCΔ15 in chromosome XVI and YORWΔ22 in chromosome XV [14] (Fig. 1a). Both integration sites are solo long terminal repeats (solo LTRs) and are distal to neighboring coding genetic features, with the nearest being a tRNA gene 831 bp downstream of YPRCΔ15 and an open reading frame 719 bp upstream of YORWΔ22. The adaptation of the GoldenBraid plasmids consisted of a modification to the acceptor plasmids to include arms of homology that allow recombination into these specific locations in the yeast genome, but does not otherwise alter the GoldenBraid cloning mechanism.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Adaptation of GoldenBraid2.0 system for integration of constructs in S. cerevisiae genome. a Schematic representation of the GoldenBraid2.0 plasmids adapted for integration of constructs into the genome of S. cerevisiae. b Diagram of the two transcriptional units constructs used in (c-e) (AOH, arms of homology; goi, gene of interest; G418R, kanMX G418 resistance cassette, for (c-d), MTS: Su9, for (e), MTS: MAM33). c Comparison of NifU expression in two transformants after integration in the YPRCΔ15 and YORWΔ22 loci of S. cerevisiae strain W303. Anti-NifU western blot of alkaline whole cell extracts from saturated cultures containing glucose as the carbon source were used. Control refers to non-transformed cells. The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control. d Mitochondrial fractionation with lanes corresponding to total cell extract, pelleted cell debris after centrifugation, cytoplasmic and mitochondrial-enriched fractions from cells in (c) (transformant colony one). Anti-NifU WB is shown in the upper panel, anti-HSP60 WB (mitochondrial matrix marker) is the middle panel and anti-tubulin WB (cytoplasmic marker) is the lower panel. e Comparison of NifU expression in two transformants after integration into the YPRCΔ15 and YORWΔ22 sites of W303 and CEN.PK S. cerevisiae strains. Saturated cultures containing glucose as the carbon source were used. Control refers to non-transformed cells. The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control

As a proof of principle to test the ability to successfully assemble TUs for expression in yeast, constructs were generated containing two TUs. The first TU contained a nitrogenase-specific [Fe–S] cluster biosynthetic protein nifU from A. vinelandii targeted to the mitochondrial matrix and driven by the constitutive promoter of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (TDH3p). NifU was chosen for this proof of concept as it was shown to be stable and accumulate in its functional form in the mitochondrial matrix of S. cerevisiae when expressed fused to the Su9 mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS) from Neurospora crassa [13]. The second TU is an antibiotic resistance cassette for the selection of integrants. This construct containing two TUs was assembled in both GoldenBraid adapted plasmids containing YPRCΔ15 or YORWΔ22 arms of homology and integrated in the two regions of the genome (Fig. 1b). A consistently high expression level of NifU was achieved from two different transformant colonies after integration into either genomic solo LTR region (nifU-YPRCΔ15 and nifU-YORWΔ22, Fig. 1c). Moreover, production of NifU driven by the TDH3 promoter was similar at both integration sties, as assessed by WB.

Nuclear encoded mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol as precursor polypeptides carrying N-terminal MTSs. When transported across the mitochondrial membranes, most proteins are processed from the primary translation product with MTSs being removed by specific processing endopeptidases [21]. NifU proteins were detected as single bands by WB analysis (Fig. 1c), suggesting good expression, mitochondrial targeting and processing. To verify the specific targeting of NifU into the mitochondrial matrix compartment, we prepared mitochondrial extracts from culture-grown cells. NifU was detected in the mitochondria-enriched fraction by WB. The mitochondria-enriched fraction was validated as containing mitochondrial proteins by confirming the presence of the mitochondrial soluble matrix protein HSP60 by WB. In contrast, the mitochondria-enriched fraction was shown to lack the cytoplasmic protein tubulin by anti-tubulin WB (Fig. 1d).

The arm of homology sequences used for integrative recombination perfectly match the corresponding genome sequence of S. cerevisiae strain W303. They also have very high homology with the corresponding loci of other strains used for biotechnological applications, such as CEN.PK (95.5% and 99.5% identity for YPRCΔ15 and YORWΔ22, respectively; Additional file 4: Figure S2). We tested the ability of the nifU-YPRCΔ15 and nifU-YORWΔ22 constructs to integrate into the genome of CEN.PK yeast and observed similar expression levels of NifU by WB for both constructs as was seen in W303 (Fig. 1e).

High dynamic range promoter library

We aimed for our system to be sufficiently versatile in its design to be useful for a variety of synthetic biology projects. To meet that end, we generated a library of promoters, eight constitutive and one inducible, covering a wide range of expression level and tested them for their ability to drive nifU expression (Additional file 5: Figure S3) [22]. The GAL1p was used for inducible nifU expression after addition of galactose to the growth media (Fig. 2a). The constitutive promoters PGK1p, TDH3p, TEF2p, TPI1p, PYK1p, PGI1p, TDH2p and HXT7p were tested in cells grown with either glucose (Fig. 2b) or glycerol (Fig. 2c) as the carbon source. Six of these promoters (PGK1p, TDH3p, TPI1p, PYK1p, PGI1p and TDH2p) correspond to yeast glycolytic pathway genes and have been widely used to drive high gene expression when provided with glucose as a carbon source. An abundance of glucose in the media is catabolized by yeast mainly by fermentation, whereas cells assimilating glycerol respire as its catabolism provides electrons to the mitochondrial respiratory chain [23]. Our constitutive promoter library proved to drive expression across a high dynamic range with both carbon sources as assessed by anti-NifU WB of alkaline cell extracts. In particular, the promoters PGK1p, TDH3p and TEF2p drove very high expression of NifU in both glucose and glycerol. The promoters TPI1p, PYK1p, PGI1p, TDH2p and HXT7p, however, drove several-fold higher levels of expression of NifU with glycerol as the carbon source. The most dramatic difference was observed with HXT7p, which increased considerably in the case of cells that were respiring on glycerol, consistent with its role as a high-affinity hexose transporter and previously known to be induced at low glucose concentrations [24].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Nine toolkit promoters drive nifU expression in different carbon sources. a Anti-NifU WB analysis of inducible nifU expression driven by the GAL1p in exponentially growing cultures containing glucose or galactose as carbon source (CS) as indicated (constructs inserted into YORWΔ22 locus of strain W303). The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control. b-c Anti-NifU WB analysis of nifU expression driven by different promoters (constructs inserted into YPRCΔ15 locus of strain W303) in exponentially growing cultures containing glucose (b) or glycerol (c) as the carbon source. The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control

Mitochondrial targeting signal library

A library of MTSs was also included in the toolkit (Additional file 5: Figure S2) to avoid excessive repetition when expressing and targeting multiple genes to mitochondria. Apart from the two MTSs formerly demonstrated to target homologous proteins to the yeast mitochondrial matrix from the N. crassa Su9 protein [25] and from S. cerevisiae MAM33 [26] (Fig. 1c), we tested the mitochondrial import of NifU fused to a plant MTS (MTS2, from the β subunit of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia F1 ATPase, [27]) and five additional MTSs from S. cerevisiae proteins identified as part of the yeast mitochondrial proteome (GLRX2, ATPA, ODPA, ODPB and SOD2) [28]. Targeting of the tested MTSs into their proteolytically cleaved, higher mobility processed form was used as an indicator of import into the mitochondrial matrix as tested by anti-NifU WB. The sizes of the MTSs range from 8.5 to 22.5 kDa (for ODPA/ODPB and MTS2, respectively) and a higher mobility band detected by WB corresponding to a loss of the MTS is suggestive of import of the NifU protein into the mitochondrial matrix (Fig. 3a). For MTSs SOD2, ODPA and ODPB the cleavage was not complete and two bands were clearly visible, the lower mobility band corresponding to the size of the NifU protein plus the MTS used in each case. In the case of MTS2 and GLRX2 fused to NifU, we observed only a single lower mobility band corresponding to a failure in the cleavage of the targeting peptide and/or a failure of import into the mitochondrial matrix. The other three MTSs tested, Su9, MAM33 and ATPA, yielded a single higher mobility band suggestive of correct matrix import and cleavage. Mitochondrial extracts were prepared for these strains and targeting of NifU into the mitochondrial matrix compartment was confirmed (Additional file 6: Figure S4).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Processing of different mitochondrial targeting sequences fused to NifU in different culture conditions and analysis of nif-related gene expression. a Anti-NifU WB showing the processing of the different mitochondrial targeting signals of NifU (W303 strains with constructs inserted into YPRCΔ15) in exponentially growing cultures containing glucose as carbon source. The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control. b Anti-His WB analysis of nif-related gene expression in W303 exponentially growing cultures (two left panels) or saturated cultures (OD600 ~ 10, right panel) using glucose as the carbon source. All strains carried the nif genes inserted into the YPRCΔ15 locus. The lower panels show the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control. c Same as (a), but using glycerol as the carbon source. d Growth curve of a S. cerevisiae W303 culture growing with glucose as the carbon source (upper panel) and glucose determination in the media (lower panel). Note the growth lag that coincides with the exhaustion of glucose and with a probable adaptation of the culture to ethanol respiration. e Processing of different mitochondrial targeting signals of NifU in W303 cultures containing glucose as carbon source at an OD600 of 12 (post-glucose exhaustion). The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control

Expression of a variety of Nif proteins

To demonstrate the ability of our yeast-adapted GoldenBraid system to assemble and successfully express a variety of TUs, we separately expressed 14 different His-tagged nitrogenase-related proteins and assessed their production by anti-His tag WB (Fig. 3b). A subset of structural proteins included: the MoFe protein (encoded by nifD and nifK), which is the catalytic component of nitrogenase containing the active-site FeMo-cofactor and the P-cluster, and the Fe protein (encoded by nifH), which acts as obligate electron donor to the MoFe protein. NifH is also required for P-cluster formation and FeMo-co biosynthesis [29]. Also included is NifM, a protein with similarity to prolyl isomerases, which is required for the maturation of NifH. A second subset of proteins required for the biosynthesis of the cofactors embedded in the structural proteins included: the Nif-specific [Fe–S] cluster biosynthetic proteins NifU and NifS; the FeMo-co biosynthetic proteins NifB [30], NifEN [31], and NifX [32], the homocitrate synthase NifV [33], and the molybdenum donor NifQ [34]. A third subset included the NifF flavodoxin that acts as electron donor to NifH and the NifJ pyruvate-flavodoxin oxidoreductase.

Yeast optimized codon usage versions of the 13 Azotobacter vinelandii nif genes and Klebsiella oxytoca nifJ were assembled into TUs (Additional file 5: Figure S2), inserted into the YPRCΔ15 locus of S. cerevisiae and expressed under the same conditions shown in Fig. 1c for nifU (i.e. using the TDH3 constitutive promoter and the Su9 MTS). Nif proteins NifU, NifS, NifB, NifE, NifN, NifH NifM, NifD, NifK, NifV, NifQ and NifJ were detected as single bands in anti-His tag WB analysis (Fig. 3b), indicating good expression, mitochondrial targeting and MTS cleavage. Importantly, the produced proteins were stable enough to accumulate in cells of aerobically-grown cultures despite these proteins being oxygen sensitive. Nif proteins NifX and NifF were detected as two bands by WB, suggestive of incomplete MTS processing. Expression levels varied slightly among the different Nif proteins as determined by WB band intensity, and NifF and NifJ were only detected in the stationary growth phase.

Mitochondrial morphology and activity in S. cerevisiae is closely linked to the metabolic activity of yeast [35]. We wondered if a respiratory state in which cells have many small and very active mitochondria would increase the efficiency of the MTSs. Figure 3c shows that this was indeed the case, since growth in media with glycerol as the carbon source generally improved MTS processing. The ODPA and ODPB MTSs were completely processed, and processing of SOD2 was very much enhanced. In fact, longer term cultures grown in media containing glucose, where it had been exhausted and respiration of ethanol is probably taking place (Fig. 3d), showed a similar behavior (Fig. 3e).

To validate the potential of the GoldenBraid adapted system for the easy and rapid generation of S. cerevisiae strains with engineered pathways, we proceeded to generate more complex constructs containing three transcriptional units each and to generate a recombinant strain with insertions into both of the target sites. A construct containing the nifU, nifS, and the hphMX transcription units was generated and successfully inserted into the YPRCΔ22 locus. Next, this strain was transformed with a construct containing transcriptional units for nifH, nifM, and kanMX for insertion into the YORWΔ15 locus (Fig. 4a). Following the second integration in the genome, two doubly resistant colonies were tested and showed comparable levels of accumulation of the recombinant proteins (Fig. 4b-d) (note that NifS fails to accumulate since its expression is driven by the HXT7p that is not induced during growth in glucose, data not shown).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Example of the capabilities to generate genome-integrated multiple TU constructs using the GoldenBraid2.0 yeast-adapted system. a Diagram of the construct containing multiple TUs used for the simultaneous expression of nifH, nifM, nifU and nifS. WB analysis of NifH (b), NifM (c) and NifU (d) accumulation in exponentially growing cultures of the W303 strain containing glucose as the carbon source. The lower panel shows the corresponding membrane Coomassie stained as a loading control

Discussion

We describe the development and validation of a synthetic biology toolkit for modular assembly of TUs and their expression in yeast. This toolkit has a number of features that make it beneficial. We show the ability to assemble and genome integrate constructs containing multiple TUs with ease in a workflow that takes approximately 2 weeks (with an additional week if new GB parts are required). Our results are predominantly focused on the proof-of-principle expression of the [Fe–S] cluster biosynthetic protein NifU, which is fundamental to the synthesis of metallocluster cofactors of nitrogenase enzymes. We demonstrate consistent expression of nifU across individual transformants with no variation in expression as assessed by WB. Our system has recombination arms of homology for single copy integration at two solo LTR loci (YPRCΔ15 and YORWΔ22) that we show support integration into two yeast strains, W303 and CEN.PK. It is expected that our system could also be used for integration in other strains of S. cerevisiae and even into other members of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto clade, given that they also contain these solo LTR loci (which can be highly divergent) and that the degree of homology at these loci are sufficient to support double recombination. Both integration target loci appear to yield similar levels of expression of nifU driven by the constitutive TDH3 promoter. This could be advantageous as the expression level of a given integrated TU could solely be driven by the strength of its promoter, not by differences in the integration locus or copy number. Thus, in situations where the stoichiometry of proteins expressed from two separate TU assemblies is paramount, using the same promoter at both integrative sites would be expected to produce similar levels of protein. In contrast to this, promoters of different strengths are expected to have the same relative difference in strength regardless of insertion at either loci.

Our library of promoter parts for driving transgene expression give the option for induced expression via the GAL1 promoter or constitutive expression using eight promoters that span a high dynamic range. A subset of these constitutive promoters showed different expression profiles during fermentative versus respiration growth. The promoters TPI1p, PYK1p, PGI1p, TDH2p and HXT7p resulted in higher expression in cultures with glycerol provided as the carbon source, facilitating respiration (Fig. 2b versus 2C). Most dramatically, the high affinity hexose transporter promoter, HXT7p, only drove detectable accumulation of NifU protein in glycerol-grown cells, a result that is likely related to this promoter being most active in hexose deprived conditions.

Taken together, our toolkit provides users with a wide flexibility of promoters to choose from that drive expression across a range of strengths and have differences in expression dependent on carbon source. This is especially significant in our case where we desire the import and accumulation of heterologous nitrogenase proteins specifically within the mitochondrial compartment and gives us additional promoter options to choose from in glycerol-grown respiring conditions. Of final note, it has been shown that yeast promoters are highly orthogonal since their relative strengths are largely independent of the downstream coding sequence [36]. The results observed for nifU are consistent with this, since the chosen promoters cover a range of expression similar to that shown in previous work with reporter genes [22]. The same expression behavior can thus be expected for other transgenes.

Our toolkit also contains a library of validated MTSs for targeting of heterologous proteins to the mitochondrial matrix. We observed an overall enhancement of mitochondrial import during respiring growth in the cultures, as assessed by a general increase in the cleaved, higher mobility protein bands on WBs. This suggests the favorable growth conditions for future attempts at expressing and assaying oxygen sensitive-recombinant protein function in yeast mitochondria. For two of the MTSs, SOD2 and MAM33, we confirmed that they function similarly for mitochondrial import independent of their cargo protein as the higher mobility MTS cleaved form of their cargo protein was consistently detected in cargo protein-specific WBs. For SOD2, compare the NifU doublet band pattern in the Fig. 3a WB versus the doublet seen in the NifM WB in Fig. 4b. Similarly for MAM33, compare the NifU single cleaved band pattern in the Fig. 3a WB versus the single band seen in the NifU WB in Fig. 4b. The consistency of import/cleavage conferred by any MTS upon a cargo protein should be confirmed for every protein fusion as it was established that the nature of the cargo protein can influence the efficiency of protein delivery and translocation across the mitochondrial membrane [37].

Comparison with other modular assembly toolkits

We developed our yeast adapted GoldenBraid toolkit based on the GB2.0 standard. The current GoldenBraid standard is GB3.0 and incorporates new bioinformatics tools through the GoldenBraid website (www.gbcloning.org). Functionally, both of these GoldenBraid standards are fully compatible, with GB3.0 introducing a few new structural elements. GB3.0 includes a new set of destination vectors with increased in planta transformation efficiency and a CamR domestication vector, all of which work seamlessly with GB2.0 and our toolkit. In contrast to other cloning methods such as Gibson assembly, GoldenBraid requires the removal of specific Type IIS restriction sites from the parts in order for the GB reaction to proceed (termed “domestication”). Thus, the creation of a library of interchangeable and shareable parts is a key component of GB assembly, in contrast to Gibson assembly. Our toolkit has similar advantages to other modular assembly cloning toolkits used for yeast, such as MoClo-YTK and yGG [1, 2]. Unfortunately, the 4 nucleotide flanking overhangs that determine part type are different in all three systems, thus making parts incompatible between them. However, our choice of overhangs correspond with the agreed upon international standard for MoClo and GoldenBraid designs [38], making it possible to use any future part designed for these systems. In our system, the solo LTR-targeting arms of homology are fixed, allowing integration into two genomic loci. This is similar to the strategies employed by other toolkits, such as the MoClo-YTK toolkit that integrates constructs as a single copy into a landing pad at the URA3 locus [1] or the yGG toolkit that allows for single copy integrations into the URA3, LEU2, TRP1, and/or HIS3 loci [2]. Our choice to integrate into these two solo LTR loci was motivated by these sites being reported to support a high level of transgene expression, a finding verified by our results [14]. A design consideration that is not included in our system would be to include new recombination arms of homology as separate TU cassettes flanking the transgene-containing TUs. This design would be a way to allow the use of an assembly toolkit to build constructs that could be integrated into the genome of any organism that supports transformation and recombination of linear DNA fragments.

Conclusions

We have validated the utility of the GoldenBraid modular assembly cloning system for heterologous gene expression in yeast by the integration of multiple TU-containing constructs into two genome loci. The assembly of such constructs in the yeast adapted system was rapid and produced consistent and repeatable results. Our goal was to create a system for mitochondrial targeting of heterologous proteins throughout a range of expression levels. Our evaluation of promoter and MTS parts demonstrated that several of each were effective in mediating a broad range of expression and for the import of recombinant proteins into the yeast mitochondrial matrix. By establishing the validity of this toolkit, further studies can now proceed towards the expression of active assemblies of nitrogenase enzymes in yeast mitochondria.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Technical help from Cristina Vaca, Diana Coroian and José María Buesa is greatly appreciated.

Funding

This work was supported by Ramón y Cajal Grant from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad de España RYC-2012–10,367 and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Grants OPP1042444 and OPP1143172.

Availability of data and materials

Data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional information files. Plasmids are available from the corresponding author on request and from Addgene (for ID numbers see Additional file 7: Figure S5).

Authors’ contributions

APG performed and analyzed the experiments. RK and HKV designed the GoldenBraid toolkit parts. RK designed and validated the GoldenBraid vectors adapted for yeast genome integration. HKV domesticated parts in the pUPD vector. MV cloned most of the constructs. MNR cloned nifQ in pUPD vector. LMR and EC designed the study and analyzed the experiments. EC, LMR and RK wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
(2)
Present Address: Department of Environmental Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CIB-CSIC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
(3)
Present Address: Mankind Research Centre, IMT Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122050, India

References

  1. Lee ME, DeLoache WC, Cervantes B, Dueber JEA. Highly characterized yeast toolkit for modular, multipart assembly. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:975–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Agmon N, Mitchell LA, Cai Y, Ikushima S, Chuang J, Zheng A, et al. Yeast golden gate (yGG) for the efficient assembly of S. cerevisiae transcription units. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:853–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pierrel F, Cobine PA, Winge DR. Metal ion availability in mitochondria. Biometals. 2007;20(3-4):675.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman J, Gershoni JM, Zamir A. Expression of nitrogen fixation genes in foreign hosts. Assembly of nitrogenase Fe protein in Escherichia Coli and in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:5240–3.Google Scholar
  5. Berman J, Zilberstein A, Salomon D, Zamir A. Expression of a nitrogen-fixation gene encoding a nitrogenase subunit in yeast. Gene. 1985;35:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zamir A, Maina CV, Fink GR, Szalay AA. Stable chromosomal integration of the entire nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella Pneumoniae in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:3496–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Holland D, Zilberstein A, Govezensky D, Salomon D, Zamir A. Nitrogenase MoFe protein subunits from Klebsiella Pneumoniae expressed in foreign hosts. Characteristics and interactions. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:8814–20.Google Scholar
  8. Burén S, Young EM, Sweeny EA, Lopez-Torrejón G, Veldhuizen M, Voigt CA, et al. Formation of Nitrogenase NifDK tetramers in the mitochondria of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6(6):1043–55. acssynbio.6b00371View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng Q, Day A, Dowson-Day M, Shen G-F, Dixon R. The Klebsiella Pneumoniae nitrogenase Fe protein gene (nifH) functionally substitutes for the chlL gene in Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329:966–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ivleva NB, Groat J, Staub JM, Stephens M, Ritchie J, Singh U, et al. Expression of active subunit of Nitrogenase via integration into plant organelle genome. PLoS One. 2016;11:e016e0951.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixon R, Cheng Q, Shen G-F, Day A, Dowson-Day M. Nif gene transfer and expression in chloroplasts: prospects and problems. Plant Soil. 1997;194(1/2):193–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Allen RS, Tilbrook K, Warden AC, Campbell PC, Rolland V, Singh SP, et al. Expression of 16 Nitrogenase proteins within the plant mitochondrial matrix. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:287.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. López-Torrejón G, Jiménez-Vicente E, Buesa JM, Hernandez JA, Verma HK, Rubio LM. Expression of a functional oxygen-labile nitrogenase component in the mitochondrial matrix of aerobically grown yeast. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Flagfeldt DB, Siewers V, Huang L, Nielsen J. Characterization of chromosomal integration sites for heterologous gene expression in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Yeast. 2009;26:545–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarrion-Perdigones A, Vazquez-Vilar M, Palací J, Castelijns B, Forment J, Ziarsolo P, et al. GoldenBraid 2.0: a comprehensive DNA assembly framework for plant synthetic biology. Plant Physiol. 2013;162:1618–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunham MJ, Gartenberg MR, Brown GW. Methods in yeast genetics and genomics, 2015 edition: a CSHL course manual. Cold Spring Harbor: CSHL; 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Harju S, Fedosyuk H, Peterson KR. Rapid isolation of yeast genomic DNA: bust n’ grab. BMC Biotechnol. 2004;4:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kushnirov VV. Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast. 2000;16:857–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Welinder C, Ekblad L. Coomassie staining as loading control in western blot analysis. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:1416–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Diekert K, de Kroon AI, Kispal G, Lill R. Isolation and subfractionation of mitochondria from the yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Methods Cell Biol. 2001;65:37–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gakh O, Cavadini P, Isaya G. Mitochondrial processing peptidases. Biochim biophys Acta - Mol. Cell Res. 2002;1592:63–77.Google Scholar
  22. Partow S, Siewers V, Bjørn S, Nielsen J, Maury J. Characterization of different promoters for designing a new expression vector in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Yeast. 2010;27:955–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Entian KD, Barnett JA. Regulation of sugar utilization by Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992;17:506–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Reifenberger E, Freidel K, Ciriacy M. Identification of novel HXT genes in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae reveals the impact of individual hexose transporters on qlycolytic flux. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16:157–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Viebrock A, Perz A, Sebald W. The imported preprotein of the proteolipid subunit of the mitochondrial ATP synthase from Neurospora crassa. Molecular cloning and sequencing of the mRNA. EMBO J. 1982;1:565–71.Google Scholar
  26. Seytter T, Lottspeich F, Neupert W, Schwarz E. Mam33p, an oligomeric, acidic protein in the mitochondrial matrix ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the human complement receptor gC1q-R. Yeast. 1998;14:303–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Boutry M, Chua NHA. Nuclear gene encoding the beta subunit of the mitochondrial ATP synthase in Nicotiana Plumbaginifolia. EMBO J. 1985;4:2159–65.Google Scholar
  28. Reinders J, Zahedi RP, Pfanner N, Meisinger C, Sickmann A. Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2006;5:1543–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Curatti L, Rubio LM. Challenges to develop nitrogen-fixing cereals by direct nif-gene transfer. Plant Sci. 2014;225:130–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Curatti L, Ludden PW, Rubio LM. NifB-dependent in vitro synthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5297–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Goodwin PJ, Agar JN, Roll JT, Roberts GP, Johnson MK, Dean DR. The Azotobacter vinelandii NifEN complex contains two identical [4Fe-4S] clusters. Biochemistry. 1998;37:10420–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hernandez JA, Igarashi RY, Soboh B, Curatti L, Dean DR, Ludden PW, et al. NifX and NifEN exchange NifB cofactor and the VK-cluster, a newly isolated intermediate of the iron-molybdenum cofactor biosynthetic pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:177–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoover TR, Robertson AD, Cerny RL, Hayes RN, Imperial J, Shah VK, et al. Identification of the V factor needed for synthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase as homocitrate. Nature. 1987;329:855–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Imperial J, Ugalde RA, Shah VK, Brill WJ. Role of the nifQ gene product in the incorporation of molybdenum into nitrogenase in Klebsiella Pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 1984;158:187–94.Google Scholar
  35. Visser W, van Spronsen EA, Nanninga N, Pronk JT, Gijs Kuenen J, van Dijken JP. Effects of growth conditions on mitochondrial morphology in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1995;67:243–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee ME, Aswani A, Han AS, Tomlin CJ, Dueber JE. Expression-level optimization of a multi-enzyme pathway in the absence of a high-throughput assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:10668–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Steeg H, Oudshoorn P, Van Hell B, Polman JE, Grivell LA. Targeting efficiency of a mitochondrial pre-sequence is dependent on the passenger protein. EMBO J. 1986;5:3643–50.Google Scholar
  38. Patron NJ, Orzaez D, Marillonnet S, Warzecha H, Matthewman C, Youles M, et al. Standards for plant synthetic biology: a common syntax for exchange of DNA parts. New Phytol. 2015;208:13–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us