Open Access

Reliable handling of highly A/T-rich genomic DNA for efficient generation of knockin strains of Dictyostelium discoideum

BMC Biotechnology201616:37

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0267-8

Received: 14 January 2016

Accepted: 7 April 2016

Published: 14 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, is a well-established model organism for studying cellular physiology and developmental pattern formation. Its haploid genome facilitates functional analysis of genes by a single round of mutagenesis including targeted disruption. Although the efficient generation of knockout strains based on an intrinsically high homologous recombination rate has been demonstrated, successful reports for knockin strains have been limited. As social amoeba has an exceptionally high adenine and thymine (A/T)-content, conventional plasmid-based vector construction has been constrained due to deleterious deletion in E. coli.

Results

We describe here a simple and efficient strategy to construct GFP-knockin cassettes by using a linear DNA cloning vector derived from N15 bacteriophage. This allows reliable handling of DNA fragments whose A/T-content may be as high as 85 %, and which cannot be cloned into a circular plasmid. By optimizing the length of recombination arms, we successfully generate GFP-knockin strains for five genes involved in cAMP signalling, including a triple-colour knockin strain.

Conclusions

This robust strategy would be useful in handling DNA fragments with biased A/T-contents such as the genome of lower organisms and the promoter/terminator regions of higher organisms.

Keywords

A/T-rich genome Linear DNA cloning Knockin Dictyostelium discoideum

Background

The eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum (D. discoideum), also called social amoeba, is an excellent model to study the principles of unicellular physiology and multicellular development. In addition to the small genome size (34 Mb encoding ~13,500 genes) [1], its haploidy is highly compatible with the functional analysis of genes by mutational approaches. Genome-wide mutations have been randomly introduced by chemical mutagenesis and semi-randomly by restriction enzyme mediated integration mutagenesis (REMI) [2, 3]. Homologous recombination has also been effective for introducing site-specific mutations, or for the targeted disruption of genes of interest (GOI). As with other model organisms, gene targeting has been performed by introducing a DNA cassette consisting of a selection marker flanked by 5′ and 3′ recombination arms. For D. discoideum, up to a few kb of homology arm was sufficient to obtain knockout strains with high efficiency (>20 %) [4, 5].

Knockin, while also utilizing homologous recombination, would be a powerful strategy. 5′- or 3′-terminal tagging of genes with fluorescent proteins (FPs) at the endogenous locus is highly useful for quantitative analysis of protein abundance and cellular localization [6, 7]. Replacing the endogenous promoter with a synthetic one such as the tetracycline-inducible system (Tet-system) is another application which allows efficient control of the gene expression level [810]. In spite of potential applicability, successful generation of knockin strains has been limited to a few loci, while knockout strains have been routinely generated [612].

One possible explanation for this constraint is the technical difficulty in constructing knockin DNA cassettes compared with knockout DNA cassettes. The DNA cassette for gene tagging and promoter replacement must harbour terminator or promoter sequences from the endogenous targeted gene. The genome of D. discoideum has an intrinsically high A/T-content, with the promoter, terminator and intron sequences often showing >85 % A/T-content while that of exons is more moderate (~70 % of A/T) [1]. As has been widely accepted, A/T-rich or repetitive DNA fragments are notoriously unstable in circular plasmids due to secondary structures and the functional interference with transcription and replication systems of the host E. coli [1316].

Cloning of unstable DNA has been enhanced by the use of modified plasmid vectors and host E. coli [14]. Low-copy number and transcription-free plasmids have been utilized for cloning small A/T-rich fragments. Recombinase-deficient E. coli strains have been developed to increase the stability of cloned DNAs containing repetitive sequences. However, construction of tagging vectors by using a circular plasmid was unsuccessful in our trial. We routinely experienced difficulties in the cloning of promoter or 3′ UTR/terminator sequences whose A/T-contents exceeded 75 %. Once a knockin cassette was successfully constructed, we often experienced serious instability during its maintenance in E. coli even when we utilized the improved materials described above.

To circumvent these issues, we employed a recently developed linear DNA cloning system that allows robust handling of large and A/T-rich DNA fragments [1719]. We first demonstrated the efficient construction of 3′-tagging vectors by a simple restriction-ligation method. We then optimized the size of recombination arms for efficient knockin, and identified that the critical arm length differs depending on the target locus. Robustness of our strategy was finally demonstrated by multiple labelling of a gene with three different fluorescent proteins. These results suggest that our simple strategy would facilitate genomic manipulations which had previously been hampered by the inability to clone DNA fragments with biased A/T-contents for a variety of model organisms.

Methods

General molecular biology

For the preparation of genomic DNA, amoeba cells were suspended in quick lysis solution (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.45 % NP40, 0.45 % Tween 20 and 1 μg/μl of proteinase K) to ~50 cells/μl. Cells were lysed at 55 °C for 10 min, then heat denatured at 95 °C for 5 min. 1 μl of cell lysate was analysed by PCR. PCR for DNA cloning and genome analysis was performed by using KODplus (TOYOBO) and EmeraldAmp (TAKARA), respectively. PCR was performed according to the touch-down protocol as follows: (94°C_1 min, 60 °C_30 s, 60 °C_1 min/kb) × 5 cycles; followed by (94°C_1 min, 53°C_30 s, 60 °C_1 min/kb) × 5 cycles; (94 °C_1 min, 46°C_30 s, 60 °C_1 min/kb) × 5 cycles; and (94°C_1 min, 40°C_30 s, 60 °C_1 min/kb) × 25 cycles. Transcripts from knockin loci were RT-PCR amplified using an oligo-dT primer. Sequence verified cDNAs were subcloned into pDM304, the extra-chromosomal plasmid vector for D. discoideum, to establish cells over-expressing tagged proteins [20]. Southern blotting was performed as described in Additional file 1.

Handling A/T-rich DNA

Extension of PCR was carried out at 60 °C as A/T-rich fragments are often poorly amplified at higher temperatures [21]. DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis were stained with Gel-Red (Biotium) then were visualized by a blue light illuminator instead of UV to minimise photo-induced DNA damage. DNA fragments were collected by mechanical filtration by using a GenElute Agarose spin column kit (SigmaAldrich: G2291-70EA). Note that the chemical elution kit was not appropriate as A/T-rich DNAs are irreversibly denatured in the presence of chaotropic agents such as guanidinium and iodide ions [22].

Universal knockin module

To create universal knockin modules encoding fusion-ready fluorescent proteins followed by the excisable selection marker (Additional file 2: Figure S1), three amplicon units were sequentially cloned between the BamHI and ApaI site of pBluescript SK. Unit 1: cDNA of FPs sandwiched between a fusion linker (encoding 26 amino acids, Additional file 2: Figure S1) and the 1st LoxP site (BamHI > HindIII). Unit 2: Terminator of myosin heavy chain A (HindIII > SalI). Unit 3: BsR-selection marker with the 2nd LoxP site amplified from pLPBLP [23] (SalI > ApaI). To allow efficient expression of fluorescent proteins in D.d cells, cDNA from Aequorea victoria (a.v.) was utilized. To generate a.v._mEGFP, F64L, S65T, Y100F, S108T, M141L, A206K and I219V mutations were introduced into the original GFP by site directed mutagenesis. To generate a.v._Turquoise2 [24], F64L, Y66W, S72A, Y100F, S108T, M141L, N146F, H148D, M153T, V163A, S175G, I219V and H231L were introduced to the original GFP. mRFPmars whose codon usage was optimised for D. discoideum, was PCR amplified from pmRFPmars-LimΔcoil (Dicty Stock Center ID_475) [25]. Resulting plasmids, pUniv_CKI_mEGFP, _Turq2 and _mRFPmars whose GenBank Accession numbers are KU163138, KU163139 and KU163140, respectively, were deposited in the Dicty stock center.

Construction of knockin vectors by using linear cloning system

DNA fragments for the knockin vector were assembled by using the pJAZZ linear DNA cloning system (Lucigen, #43036 and 43042). We first PCR amplified the 3′ recombination arm (i.e., 3′ UTR/terminator) and cloned it into the pJAZZ-OK_blunt vector according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 10–30 μg of pJAZZ vector harbouring the 3′ recombination arm in the correct orientation was digested with ApaI and the resulting shorter fragment was separated by gel electrophoresis. The fragment was filter-eluted and concentrated to >100 ng/μl after desalting by ethanol precipitation. Similarly, a long arm of NotI digested pJAZZ control vector, NotI/BamHI digested 5′ recombination arm of GOI and BamHI/ApaI digested knockin module were prepared. 100 ng each of these four fragments were directionally ligated by single tube reaction and electroporated into TSA E. coli. Colonies were isolated from a YT-agar plate containing 30 μg/ml of kanamycin and screened by PCR and restriction enzyme digestion. For a large-scale preparation of the knockin vector, transformed TSA E. coli were cultured in 100 ml of TB medium. Approximately 100 μg of knockin vector was routinely obtained using the NucleoBond Xtra Midi kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL). To prepare the transformation-ready knockin cassette, 100 μg of knockin vectors were digested with NotI for 10 h then were cleaned-up by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation without DNA-size fractionation. The knockin DNA cassettes were suspended in sterile water (2 μg/μl) and were stored at -30 °C until use.

Cell culture

Axenic strain Ax2 was cultured and transformed as described elsewhere [4, 23, 26]. For knockin transformation, cells were washed and suspended with ice-cold EP buffer (6.6 mM KH2PO4, 2.8 mM Na2HPO4, 50 mM sucrose, pH 6.4) to 1 × 107 cells/ml. 800 μl of cell suspension mixed with 10–40 μg of NotI digested knockin vector in a 4-mm width cuvette was subjected to electroporation (5 s separated two pluses with 1.0 kV and 1.0 ms of the time constant) by using a MicroPulser (Bio-Rad). These cells were plated on 4–6 pieces of 10 cm-petri dishes with HL5 medium and incubated at 22 °C for 18 h under the non-selective condition, then were cultured in the presence of 12.5 μg/ml Blasticidin S (Wako). After 4–7 days, colonies of candidate recombinants were manually picked and were transferred into 96-well plates, then subjected for the genome check by PCR and Southern blotting analysis. Cre-recombinase mediated removal of the selection cassette was performed as described previously [23]. Briefly, NLS-Cre was transiently expressed by introducing pDEX_NLS-Cre. Candidate clones were selected in the presence of 5 μg/ml of G418 for 2–5 days followed by an additional few days’ culture in the absence of G418 (LifeTechnologies). Optionally, single cell sorting of isolated clones was performed by a JSAN cell sorter equipped with a CloneMate module (Bay Bioscience).

Immunoblotting

Cells starved for 8 h were lysed with SDS sample buffer. Proteins (3.6 × 105 cells/lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (5–15 % gradient gel, BIO CRAFT) and blotted on the PVDF membrane. GFP/Turquoise2- or mRFPmars-tagged proteins were detected with a rabbit monoclonal antibody to GFP (Abcam, ab183735) and a rat monoclonal antibody to RFP (ChromoTek, 5 F8), respectively.

Imaging

Triple-colour knockin cells on a 10-cm petri dish (8 × 106 cells/dish) were starved for 8–10 h in Development Buffer (5 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2). These cells were re-plated on a 35 mm-glass bottomed dish (Iwaki) and were left at 22 °C for 30 min allowing them to establish the aggregation stream. Live cell images were captured on an inverted confocal microscope (Nikon A1R, Nikon) equipped with PlanApoVC 60xWI (NA 1.2), multi Argon gas laser (457, 488 nm, Melles Griot) and 561 nm DPSS laser (Melles Griot).

Results

Construction of A/T-rich knockin vector by a linear cloning system

To construct >4 kb of A/T-rich GFP knockin cassette consisting of 5′ and 3′ recombination arms (~1.0 kb each) centred by the knockin module encoding the fusion ready GFP and the selection marker (BsR; blasticidin resistance), we designed a simple experimental scheme that utilizes a linear DNA cloning system which allows robust handling of large and A/T-rich DNA (Fig. 1a). To facilitate vector construction, a universal knockin module was independently prepared as pUniv_CKI_mEGFP (Fig. 1a and Additional file 2: Figure S1). In brief, it contains cDNA encoding mEGFP followed by a generic terminator from myosin heavy chain A (MHC), which allows the expression of a GFP-fusion protein just after the knockin event. Two LoxP sites were introduced for Cre-mediated excision of the MHC terminator and BsR expression unit, which is needed for recycling the BsR marker and for restoring appropriate genomic organization to allow normal gene expression under the control of the endogenous 3′ UTR/terminator of the GOI.
Fig. 1

Knockin vector construction by a linear DNA cloning system. a 3-step construction of the 3′-tagging vector. Step 1: Preparation of pJAZZ vector harbouring A/T-rich 3′ recombination. Step 2: Assembly of the knockin vector by 4-piece ligation. Step 3: Release of knockin cassette by NotI digestion. b Design of GFP knockin vector for DDB_G0273397/carA-1 harbouring 1.0 kb each of 5′ and 3′ recombination arms. c, d Stable cloning of A/T-rich 3′ UTR/terminator of carA-1 by linear cloning system. 1 kb of 3′ UTR/terminator of carA-1 were blunt cloned into pBluescript (c) and pJAZZ vector (d). Release of the insert in randomly selected 6 DNA clones was checked by restriction enzyme digestion with XhoI and SpeI for pBluescript and with NotI for pJAZZ (these are the multiple cloning sites on each vector). Variable size of released fragments in C indicates deletions of circular plasmids. Appropriate size of inserts (arrow in d) were released from all the 6 clones of pJAZZ vector. The lane for negative control (Vector) was loaded with NotI-digested pJAZZ vector carrying no insert. Arrow heads represent the long and short arm of NotI-digested pJAZZ vector. e Four DNA fragments as depicted in B were subjected to directional ligation. f DNAs from randomly selected TSA E. coli clones were digested with NotI to excise the 4.5 kb of assembled knockin cassette (arrow). g Appropriate DNA assembly in 4 clones (same as in f) was detected by PCR for fragment ligation between 2 and 3 (upper column, 2 + 3) or fragment 3 and 4 (bottom column, 3 + 4). Primer position was depicted in (b). All the molecular marker was1 kb DNA ladder

To validate this set-up, we created a GFP-knockin cassette for carA-1(DDB_G0273397), encoding cAMP receptor during aggregation (Fig. 1b). We cloned PCR amplified 3′ UTR/terminator (1.0 kb) of carA-1 into pJAZZ-OK_blunt vector [17]. Although it was not possible to clone this 1.0 kb fragment with 85 % A/T content into a circular plasmid due to the occurrence of deletions (Fig. 1c), pJAZZ vector allowed robust cloning without any signs of deletions and rearrangements (Fig. 1d) which was separately confirmed by nucleotide sequencing (data not shown). The unique ApaI site at the cloning site was utilized to prepare the shorter arm of pJAZZ vector harbouring a 3′ recombination arm of carA-1 and the kanamyicin resistance unit. Other DNA fragments corresponding to the longer arm of the pJAZZ vector (a NotI-digested 10.5 kb fragment including the replication origin), PCR amplified and NotI/BamHI digested 5′ recombination arm (72 % A/T), and BamHI/ApaI digested universal knockin module (72 % of A/T) were similarly prepared (Fig. 1e and Table 1). These four DNA fragments were directionally ligated in vitro and were transformed into TSA competent cells, which is the optimized host E. coli for pJAZZ vector [17]. Assembly of these fragments was efficient as 75 % of checked clones were identified as carrying an appropriately ligated 4.5 kb knockin cassette for the carA-1 gene (Fig. 1f-g). We also successfully constructed knockin vectors for other genes involved in cAMP signalling, containing a range of different recombination arm lengths (100–50 % efficiency, Table 1), demonstrating the robustness and general applicability of this strategy to construct the large and A/T-rich knockin DNA cassette.
Table 1

Efficiency of knockin vector construction by using a linear DNA cloning system

  

Arm length

A/T-content

  

Gene

Vector name

5′ arn

3′ arm

5′ arm

3′ arm

Knockin cassette Total

Positive clone

Efficiency

carA-1

DDB_G0273397

pJ_carA1_GFP

1.0 kb

1.0 kb

72 %

85 %

75 % (4.6 kb)

12/16

75 %

acaA

DDB_G0281545

pJ_acaA_GFP

0.6 kb

0.5 kb

74 %

83 %

72 % (3.7 kb)

8/8

100 %

regA

DDB_G0284331

pJ_regA_GFP_0.3

0.3 kb

1.0 kb

69 %

79 %

73 % (3.8 kb)

8/8

100 %

 

pJ_regA_GFP_0.5

0.5 kb

1.0 kb

69 %

79 %

73 % (4.0 kb)

7/8

88 %

 

pJ_regA_GFP_1.3

1.3 kb

1.0 kb

76 %

79 %

74 % (4.8 kb)

7/8

88 %

dagA/crac

DDB_G0285161

pJ_crac_GFP_0.3

0.3 kb

0.6 kb

69 %

80 %

72 % (3.7 kb)

8/8

100 %

 

pJ_crac_GFP_1.9

1.9 kb

0.6 kb

70 %

80 %

72 % (5.0 kb)

11/16

69 %

erkB

DDB_G0283903

pJ_erkB_GFP_0.5/0.6

0.5 kb

0.6 kb

64 %

66 %

70 % (3.6 kb)

8/8

100 %

 

pJ_erkB_GFP_1.0/0.6

1.0 kb

0.6 kb

72 %

66 %

71 % (4.1 kb)

7/8

88 %

 

pJ_erkB_GFP_1.0/1.7

1.0 kb

1.7 kb

72 %

77 %

74 % (5.2 kb)

4/8

50 %

 

pJ_erkB_GFP_0.5/1.7

0.5 kb

1.7 kb

64 %

77 %

73 % (4.7 kb)

4/8

50 %

Optimized conditions for GFP knockin

The amount of targeting cassette and the length of recombination arms have been shown to control the homologous recombination rate. To determine the minimum amount of DNA vector for 3′-terminal knockin, 10, 20 or 40 μg of NotI-digested knockin vector for carA-1 was electroporated into wildtype cells (Ax2). While none or few blasticidin resistant (BsR) colonies were obtained from cells transformed with 10 and 20 μg of linearized vector, more than 500 candidate clones grew under the selective culture conditions when 40 μg of total DNA was introduced. PCR analysis specifically detecting the homologous recombination event at both the 5′ and 3′ arms identified that 28 % of cells transformed with 40 μg of vector were positive clones whose carA-1 locus was replaced by the knockin cassette (Fig. 2a-b and Table 2). Southern blotting (Additional file 3: Figure S2), genomic sequencing (data not shown) and immunoblotting analysis (Fig. 2c) confirmed the specific expression of cARA-1-GFP protein that is not the result of random integration of knockin vector. We concluded that 40 μg of total DNA, which corresponds to ~10 μg of knockin cassette, is optimal to obtain knockin cells.
Fig. 2

Generation of GFP knockin strain for carA-1. a Genomic organization of wild-type (WT) and GFP knockin locus for DDB_G0273397/carA-1. b WT and knockin locus before and after the removal of BsR cassette was detected by PCR. The primer set fw1/rev1, both located outside the homology arms, detects WT and knockin locus (pre_Cre) as 2.0 and 4.5 kb, respectively. BsR-removal was detected as the decrease in the size of target locus from 4.5 kb (pre-Cre) to 2.7 kb (post-Cre). Primer combination of rev2 for GFP and fw1 confirms specific recombination at the 5′ arm by yielding a 1.0 kb fragment. c Expression of GFP-tagged cARA-1 protein of the knockin strain detected by western blotting. Lysate of cells over-expressing cARA-1-GFP from extrachromosomal plasmid were loaded as the detection control (1/10 volume, cARA-1-GFP O.E)

Table 2

Effect of the arm length variation on knockin efficiency

Gene

Chromosome

Vector name

5′ arm length

3′ arm length

Total amount of knockin vector

aBsR clone

bPositive clone

Efficiency

carA-1

DDB_G0273397

2

pJ_cAR1_GFP

1.0 kb

1.0 kb

10 μg

0

-

0 %

     

20 μg

3

0/3

0 %

0/0

-

     

40 μg

>500

27/96

28 %

3/16

19 %

acaA

DDB_G0281545

3

pJ_acaA_GFP

0.6 kb

0.5 kb

40 μg

>200

5/11

46 %

3/8

38 %

regA

DDB_G0284331

4

pJ_regA_GFP_0.3

0.3 kb

1.0 kb

40 μg

124

0/96

0 %

0/28

0 %

  

pJ_regA_GFP_0.5

0.5 kb

1.0 kb

40 μg

138

0/96

0 %

0/48

0 %

  

pJ_regA_GFP_1.3

1.3 kb

1.0 kb

40 μg

180

56/96

58 %

9/16

56 %

dagA/crac

DDB_G0285161

4

pJ_crac_GFP_0.3

0.3 kb

0.6 kb

40 μg

>500

0/96

0 %

0/96

0 %

  

pJ_crac_GFP_1.9

1.9 kb

0.6 kb

40 μg

>500

10/16

63 %

8/51

16 %

erkB

DDB_G0283903

4

pJ_erkB_GFP_0.5/0.6

0.5 kb

0.6 kb

40 μg

>500

0/96

0 %

0/96

0 %

  

pJ_erkB_GFP_1.0/0.6

1.0 kb

0.6 kb

40 μg

>500

0/288c

0 %

0/96

0 %

  

pJ_erkB_GFP_1.0/1.7

1.0 kb

1.7 kb

40 μg

>500

16/30

53 %

4/16

25 %

  

pJ_erkB_GFP_0.5/1.7

0.5 kb

1.7 kb

40 μg

>500

14/30

47 %

5/16

31 %

aTotal number of BsR clones from two experiments by using independently prepared materials

bThe number of homologous recombinants obtained from two independent experiments was separately provided

cOne clone with single cross-over at 5′ arm obtained from 288 of BsR colonies

We next investigated how the length of the recombination arm affects knockin efficiency. It has been demonstrated that the minimum length of homology arms differs significantly among eukaryotic species. For knockout, as short a length as 20 nucleotides is sufficient for budding yeast, S. cerevisiae [27]. Much longer arms up to 10 kb are needed for mice and malaria parasites [18, 28], while less than a few kb are sufficient for D. discoideum [23]. By using knockin vectors with distinct lengths of recombination arms, we tried to generate knockin strains for an additional four genes involved in cAMP signalling, as the recombination efficacy was expected to differ depending on the genomic locus. When cells were transformed with a knockin vector harbouring short recombination arms (0.5 kb each for 5′ and 3′) for the acaA gene, encoding adenylate cyclase during aggregation, appropriate recombinants were efficiently obtained (46 %), suggesting that homology arms as short as a few hundred base-pairs would be sufficient. For the regA gene, encoding cAMP specific intracellular phosphodiesterase, three constructs with 0.3, 0.5 and 1.3 kb of 5′ arm in combination with 1.0 kb of 3′ arm were examined. Although the vector with 0.3 or 0.5 kb of 5′ arm yielded no recombinants, that with 1.3 kb of 5′ arm yielded 58 % of positive colonies, indicating that a longer 5′ arm is needed for regA locus. This is also the case for the crac gene (DDB_G0285161); encoding cytoplasmic regulator of ac aA, such that 1.9 kb, but not 0.3 kb of 5′ recombination arm was needed for successful knockin. In the case of MAP kinase gene, erkB, a longer 3′ arm rather than 5′ arm was required. Vectors with 0.5 kb of each of homology arm yielded no recombinants from 96 screened colonies. Extending the 5′ arm to 1.0 kb was not effective, although one clone with a single cross-over at the 5′ arm (i.e., integration) was obtained from 288 BsR-clones. We then tested a knockin cassette whose 3′ arm was extended to 1.7 kb, reaching into the 2nd exon of the inversely located neighbouring gene, pigA (DDB_G0283965), while the 5′ arm was kept short (0.5 kb). In this case, 48 % of screened clones were identified to be knockin cells (14/30). The efficiency was comparable to the targeting vector harbouring long homology arms both for 5′ and 3′ arms (1.0 and 1.7 kb, respectively, 53 %). Although we did not examine much longer recombination arm, these results suggest that the efficiency of homologous recombination in D. discoideum was not linearly enhanced by longer arm, rather it was simply controlled in all-or-none fashion (Table 2). All together, these results demonstrate that the length of recombination arm up to 3 kb would be sufficient for 3′-tagging, in which downsizing was possible depending on the genomic loci.

Multicolour labelling by iterative knockin

To assess the applicability of the developed strategy, we tried to generate a knockin strain in which multiple genes were labelled with three different coloured fluorescent proteins. For this, we constructed universal knockin modules carrying fusion ready cyan and red fluorescent proteins in addition to GFP (Additional file 2: Figure S1B). To overcome the limited availability of the selectable marker in dicty cells, Cre-mediated recycling of BsR gene was utilized [23]. BsR-selection marker of acaA-GFP strain was removed by the transient expression of NLS-Cre (Fig. 3a left column). Restored sensitivity to blasticidin allowed the selection of secondary knockin of regA-mRFPmars (Fig. 3a middle column). High knockin efficiency of regA-mRFPmars (48 %) was reproduced as in the case for regA-GFP. Similarly, removal of BsR gene was repeated before and after introduction of carA-1-Turq2 (Fig. 3a right column). PCR and immunoblotting analysis confirmed successful labelling of regA and carA-1 with red and cyan fluorescent protein, respectively, yielding a triple-colour knockin strain (Fig. 3b). Live imaging of starved cells allowed simultaneous detection of subcellular localization of endogenously expressed ACAA, REGA and cARA-1 (Fig. 3c). As expected, REGA-mRFPmars was distributed throughout the cytoplasm, except for the nucleus. cARA-1-Turq2 was evenly presented at the cell membrane [29, 30]. ACA-GFP was also detected at the cell periphery like cARA-1, and there were no signs for the polarized accumulation at the rear end of chemotacting cells as reported for over-expressed ACAA-YFP [30, 31]. It is not clear the reasons for this, but the different experimental conditions such as the expression level, genetic backgrounds, linkers connecting ACA with FP or imaging conditions might explain mechanisms which should be carefully analyzed in future studies.
Fig. 3

Triple-colour knockin for ACAA-GFP, REGA_mRFPmars and cARA-1-Turq2. a Genomic organization of wild-type (WT) and knockin locus (KI) for DDB_G0281545/acaA (left column), DDB_G0284331/regA (middle column) and DDB_G0273397/carA-1 (right column) tagged with green, red and cyan fluorescent proteins, respectively. Serial knockin in this order was performed, each followed by Cre-mediated BsR-recycling. Specific recombination was detected by PCR as in Fig. 2b. Primer fw1/rev1 detects a knockin event (WT to knockin_pre-Cre) and removal of BsR cassette (knockin_pre-Cre to post-Cre) as a 2.5 kb increase and 1.7 kb decrease of the amplified band, respectively. The fw1/rev2 set detects specific recombination at the 5′ recombination arm. b Protein expression of triple-colour knockin strain. Lysate from over-expressing cells (1/10 volume) with ACAA-GFP, REGA-mRFPmars and cARA-1-GFP were loaded as the positive control. c Live confocal images of the triple-colour knockin strain developed for 8 h. ACAA-GFP and cARA-1-Turq2 were localized at the cell surface. REGA-mRFPmars was detected in the cytoplasm excluded from the nucleus. Bar: 10 μm

Discussion

We demonstrate here a simple and reliable strategy to establish knockin strains of Dictyostelium discoidium, which had been hampered by the difficulty in cloning A/T-rich DNA into circular plasmids. To our knowledge, the pJAZZ system is the unique solution allowing robust handling of unstable DNAs including genomic sequences of D. discoideum [17]. As has been recently reported, this enabled development of high quality genomic libraries for the malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei (P. berghei) and D. discoideum; both are characterized by exceptionally high A/T-contents [18, 19]. The unbiased coverage and increased stability with no limitation for the insert size suggest promising applicability for cloning A/T-rich sequences, including promoters and introns of D. discoideum which are required for 5′-tagging or promoter replacement.

The linear DNA cloning platform also allows the secondary modification of the cloned insert. As demonstrated here, simple restriction-ligation is feasible to assemble multiple pieces of A/T-rich DNA fragments without any special requisites. Compatibility with other technologies such as recombineering, utilizing lambda Red/ET-recombination, and the Gateway system yielded a scalable pipeline that can convert the pJAZZ-based genomic library to thousands of reverse genetic vectors for P. berghei). [18]. Its utility has been further strengthened by locus specific barcoding providing a versatile community resource named PlasmoGEM [32, 33]. Building the analogous pipeline based on the pJAZZ vector would no doubt accelerate the research activity of dicty community.

Another emphasis of our demonstration is in providing practical guidelines in designing a knockin vector for D. discoideum. While increasing the length of the homology arm up to 10 kb linearly boosts the recombination efficiency in P. berghei). and mice [18, 28], this is not the case for D. discoideum. Rather, the critical arm length estimated to be ~3 kb simply controls the knockin event in an almost all-or-none fashion (Table 2). Previously, poor targeting frequency was reported for some loci in which the single cross-over dominated over the double recombination event [34, 35]. erkB locus is one such example, as one insertion clone at the 5′ arm was obtained even after extensive screening. In our trial, this was simply overcome by a slightly longer recombination arm, which had not been testable under the constraints of conventional circular plasmid. As the critical length differs depending on the genomic locus, it would be cost and time saving to start with a total of 3 kb of homology arms for the manual construction of reverse genetic vectors.

Conclusion

The linear DNA cloning system is milestone technology allowing reliable handling of A/T-rich genomic DNAs needed for the reverse genetic analysis of D. discoideum. Promoter exchange, site-directed mutagenesis and functional tagging of endogenous proteins will bring new insights into the molecular mechanisms of intercellular communication, self-recognition and kin-discrimination, all of which are involved in social behaviour, one of the most popular research targets of D. discoideum. [11, 36, 37].

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

pUniv_CKI_mEGFP, _Turq2 and _mRFPmars (GenBank Accession numbers are KU163138, KU163139 and KU163140, respectively) were deposited in the Dicty stock center.

Abbreviations

A/T: 

adenine and thymine

GFP: 

green fluorescent protein

RFP: 

red fluorescent protein

cAMP: 

3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Urushibara at Tsukuba University for helpful discussion, Y. Okamura and M. Kitamura at the Support Center for Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University for cell-sorting. We also acknowledge the Dicty Stock Center for providing pLPBLP, pDEX_NLS-Cre, pDM304 and pmRFPmars-LimΔcoil. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (15 K14491), by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Spying minority in biological phenomena (No. 3306)” from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (23115003) to KH. Funding for open access charge: [MEXT/23115003].

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Bioimaging, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School

References

  1. Eichinger L, Pachebat JA, Glockner G, Rajandream MA, Sucgang R, Berriman M, Song J, Olsen R, Szafranski K, Xu Q et al. The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature. 2005;435(7038):43–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuspa A, Loomis WF. Tagging developmental genes in Dictyostelium by restriction enzyme-mediated integration of plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(18):8803–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yanagisawa K, Loomis Jr WF, Sussman M. Developmental regulation of the enzyme UDP-galactose polysaccharide transferase. Exp Cell Res. 1967;46(2):328–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaudet P, Pilcher KE, Fey P, Chisholm RL. Transformation of Dictyostelium discoideum with plasmid DNA. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(6):1317–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wiegand S, Kruse J, Gronemann S, Hammann C. Efficient generation of gene knockout plasmids for Dictyostelium discoideum using one-step cloning. Genomics. 2011;97(5):321–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bukharova T, Weijer G, Bosgraaf L, Dormann D, van Haastert PJ, Weijer CJ. Paxillin is required for cell-substrate adhesion, cell sorting and slug migration during Dictyostelium development. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 18):4295–310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang XY, Langenick J, Traynor D, Babu MM, Kay RR, Patel KJ. Xpf and not the Fanconi anaemia proteins or Rev3 accounts for the extreme resistance to cisplatin in Dictyostelium discoideum. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(9):e1000645.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Blaauw M, Linskens MH, van Haastert PJ. Efficient control of gene expression by a tetracycline-dependent transactivator in single Dictyostelium discoideum cells. Gene. 2000;252(1–2):71–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Funamoto S, Meili R, Lee S, Parry L, Firtel RA. Spatial and temporal regulation of 3-phosphoinositides by PI 3-kinase and PTEN mediates chemotaxis. Cell. 2002;109(5):611–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Myers SA, Han JW, Lee Y, Firtel RA, Chung CY. A Dictyostelium homologue of WASP is required for polarized F-actin assembly during chemotaxis. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(5):2191–206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirose S, Benabentos R, Ho HI, Kuspa A, Shaulsky G. Self-recognition in social amoebae is mediated by allelic pairs of tiger genes. Science. 2011;333(6041):467–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Thompson CR, Bretscher MS. Cell polarity and locomotion, as well as endocytosis, depend on NSF. Development. 2002;129(18):4185–92.Google Scholar
  13. Pan W, Ravot E, Tolle R, Frank R, Mosbach R, Turbachova I, Bujard H. Vaccine candidate MSP-1 from Plasmodium falciparum: a redesigned 4917 bp polynucleotide enables synthesis and isolation of full-length protein from Escherichia coli and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(4):1094–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Godiska RPM, Schoenfeld T, Mead DA. Beyond pUC: vectors for cloning unstable DNA. In: Kieleczawa J, editor. Optimization of the DNA Sequencing Process. vol. 36. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2005. p. 55–75.Google Scholar
  15. Inagaki H, Ohye T, Kogo H, Yamada K, Kowa H, Shaikh TH, Emanuel BS, Kurahashi H. Palindromic AT-rich repeat in the NF1 gene is hypervariable in humans and evolutionarily conserved in primates. Hum Mutat. 2005;26(4):332–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Burrow AA, Marullo A, Holder LR, Wang YH. Secondary structure formation and DNA instability at fragile site FRA16B. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(9):2865–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Godiska R, Mead D, Dhodda V, Wu C, Hochstein R, Karsi A, Usdin K, Entezam A, Ravin N. Linear plasmid vector for cloning of repetitive or unstable sequences in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(6):e88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pfander C, Anar B, Schwach F, Otto TD, Brochet M, Volkmann K, Quail MA, Pain A, Rosen B, Skarnes W et al. A scalable pipeline for highly effective genetic modification of a malaria parasite. Nat Methods. 2011;8(12):1078–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosengarten RD, Beltran PR, Shaulsky G. A deep coverage Dictyostelium discoideum genomic DNA library replicates stably in Escherichia coli. Genomics. 2015;106(4):249–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Veltman DM, Akar G, Bosgraaf L, Van Haastert PJ. A new set of small, extrachromosomal expression vectors for Dictyostelium discoideum. Plasmid. 2009;61(2):110–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Su XZ, Wu Y, Sifri CD, Wellems TE. Reduced extension temperatures required for PCR amplification of extremely A + T-rich DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(8):1574–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Prevorovsky M, Puta F. A/T-rich inverted DNA repeats are destabilized by chaotrope-containing buffer during purification using silica gel membrane technology. Biotechniques. 2003;35(4):698–700. 702.Google Scholar
  23. Faix J, Kreppel L, Shaulsky G, Schleicher M, Kimmel AR. A rapid and efficient method to generate multiple gene disruptions in Dictyostelium discoideum using a single selectable marker and the Cre-loxP system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(19):e143.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Goedhart J, von Stetten D, Noirclerc-Savoye M, Lelimousin M, Joosen L, Hink MA, van Weeren L, Gadella TW, Jr., Royant A. Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93 %. Nat Commun. 2012;3:751.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer M, Haase I, Simmeth E, Gerisch G, Muller-Taubenberger A. A brilliant monomeric red fluorescent protein to visualize cytoskeleton dynamics in Dictyostelium. FEBS Lett. 2004;577(1–2):227–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Fey P, Kowal AS, Gaudet P, Pilcher KE, Chisholm RL. Protocols for growth and development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(6):1307–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Eason RG, Pourmand N, Tongprasit W, Herman ZS, Anthony K, Jejelowo O, Davis RW, Stolc V. Characterization of synthetic DNA bar codes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-deletion strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(30):11046–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Manis JP. Knock out, knock in, knock down--genetically manipulated mice and the Nobel Prize. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(24):2426–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao Z, Zhang N, Murphy DB, Devreotes PN. Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation. J Cell Biol. 1997;139(2):365–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kriebel PW, Barr VA, Rericha EC, Zhang G, Parent CA. Collective cell migration requires vesicular trafficking for chemoattractant delivery at the trailing edge. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(5):949–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kriebel PW, Barr VA, Parent CA. Adenylyl cyclase localization regulates streaming during chemotaxis. Cell. 2003;112(4):549–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomes AR, Bushell E, Schwach F, Girling G, Anar B, Quail MA, Herd C, Pfander C, Modrzynska K, Rayner JC et al. A genome-scale vector resource enables high-throughput reverse genetic screening in a malaria parasite. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(3):404–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwach F, Bushell E, Gomes AR, Anar B, Girling G, Herd C, Rayner JC, Billker O. PlasmoGEM, a database supporting a community resource for large-scale experimental genetics in malaria parasites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D1176–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Charette SJ, Cornillon S, Cosson P. Identification of low frequency knockout mutants in Dictyostelium discoideum created by single or double homologous recombination. J Biotechnol. 2006;122(1):1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Calvo-Garrido J, Carilla-Latorre S, Lazaro-Dieguez F, Egea G, Escalante R. Vacuole membrane protein 1 is an endoplasmic reticulum protein required for organelle biogenesis, protein secretion, and development. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(8):3442–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Li SI, Purugganan MD. The cooperative amoeba: Dictyostelium as a model for social evolution. Trends Genet. 2011;27(2):48–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Strassmann JE, Queller DC. How social evolution theory impacts our understanding of development in the social amoeba Dictyostelium. Dev Growth Differ. 2011;53(4):597–607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mukai et al. 2016