Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology article
  • Open Access

Targeted gene disruption by use of transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) in the water flea Daphnia pulex

  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 2Email author
BMC Biotechnology201414:95

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-014-0095-7

©  Hiruta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

  • Received: 26 July 2014
  • Accepted: 28 October 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The cosmopolitan microcrustacean Daphnia pulex provides a model system for both human health research and monitoring ecosystem integrity. It is the first crustacean to have its complete genome sequenced, an unprecedented ca. 36% of which has no known homologs with any other species. Moreover, D. pulex is ideally suited for experimental manipulation because of its short reproductive cycle, large numbers of offspring, synchronization of oocyte maturation, and other life history characteristics. However, existing gene manipulation techniques are insufficient to accurately define gene functions. Although our previous investigations developed an RNA interference (RNAi) system in D. pulex, the possible time period of functional analysis was limited because the effectiveness of RNAi is transient. Thus, in this study, we developed a genome editing system for D. pulex by first microinjecting transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) mRNAs into early embryos and then evaluating TALEN activity and mutation phenotypes.

Results

We assembled a TALEN construct specific to the Distal-less gene (Dll), which is a homeobox transcription factor essential for distal limb development in invertebrates and vertebrates, and evaluated its activity in vitro by single-strand annealing assay. Then, we injected TALEN mRNAs into eggs within 1 hour post-ovulation. Injected embryos presented with defects in the second antenna and altered appendage development, and indel mutations were detected in Dll loci, indicating that this technique successfully knocked out the target gene.

Conclusions

We succeeded, for the first time in D. pulex, in targeted mutagenesis by use of Platinum TALENs. This genome editing technique makes it possible to conduct reverse genetic analysis in D. pulex, making this species an even more appropriate model organism for environmental, evolutionary, and developmental genomics.

Keywords

  • Daphnia pulex
  • Distal-less
  • Platinum TALEN
  • Gene disruption
  • Knock-out
  • Targeted mutagenesis
  • Gene manipulation
  • Genome editing

Background

Environmental cues constantly influence gene expression; hence interactions among them are indispensable for animal adaptations against changing environments. The water flea Daphnia pulex shows a striking ability to contend with environmental changes, resulting in various adaptive phenotypes involving traits such as body size, longevity, behavior, and morphology [1]. It is well known that daphnids occupy a key position as the intermediate link between primary productivity and top predators in the aquatic food chain, and they also serve as an environmental indicator organism because of their high sensitivity to water quality [2]. These characteristics, in addition to their short life cycle, large brood sizes, and synchronization of oocyte maturation, make them valuable for environmental, evolutionary, and developmental genomics studies. Furthermore, the D. pulex genome has been sequenced [3], which facilitates the identification of candidate genes involved in their unique biological attributes. The analysis of transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics also showed profiles of a large number of putative factors involved in their unique life history characteristics (cf. [4],[5]). The D. pulex genome possesses as many as about 31,000 genes; this large suite of genes may provide the arsenal responsible for the organism's responsiveness to environmental challenges [3]. So far, however, there are no effective methods for manipulating genes, and only transient analysis of gene function by the RNA interference (RNAi) method [6] is available. The RNAi system in D. pulex suffers from several weaknesses, including incomplete silencing, transient effects, and limited analyzable stages. Because of these situations, even in the post-genomic era, the establishment of a gene manipulation technique has been eagerly anticipated to address the characterization of gene function in D. pulex.

There are three main types of artificial sequence-specific nucleases based on the source mechanism of DNA binding that guides nuclease activity to a genomic target: zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) [7]. In this study, we chose TALEN to edit the D. pulex genome, although each method has both advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, sequence-specificity, off-target effects, and so on [8],[9]. The transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) were first discovered in the plant pathogen Xanthomonas sp., and are composed of a conserved central domain for site-specific DNA binding [10],[11]. The DNA-binding domain consists of varying numbers of tandem repeats of a 34-amino acid monomer, which specifies the DNA-binding sequence by its 12th and 13th amino acids, called repeat-variable di-residues (RVDs). RVDs specifically recognize a single nucleotide with the following codes: NG = T, HD = C, NI = A, NN = G or A [10],[12],[13]. Sakuma et al. [14] demonstrated that TALENs with periodically-patterned repeat variants harboring non-RVD variations, called Platinum TALENs, showed higher activities than TALENs without non-RVD variations (so-called Golden TALENs). TALENs are artificially generated by fusing TAL effector DNA-binding domains to a Fok I nuclease domain, and successfully harnessed to custom-designed sequence-specific nucleases [15],[16]. TALENs induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that can be repaired by the error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) system to cause insertion and/or deletion mutations at targeted genomic loci.

TALEN-mediated gene targeting has been applied in a great number of vertebrates and invertebrates [7],[9],[17]. In arthropods, it has been reported in insect species including flies [18], mosquitos [19],[20], crickets [21], and silkworms [22]. Very recently, mutagenesis of an eye development gene was achieved in one congener Daphnia magna using the CRISPR/Cas system [23]. However, the conditions developed in D. magna are not directly applicable to D. pulex, possibly because of the difference in egg size and contents, and developmental duration, as described in our previous study [6].

Distal-less (Dll) and its homologs, Dlx genes, which function as homeodomain transcription factors, play one of the major roles in distal limb development throughout the animal kingdom [24]. Reduction of Dll activity caused defects of distal appendage segments in arthropods, resulting in the production of an easily recognizable phenotype (cf. [25],[26]). In addition, the results of Dll RNAi in D. pulex [6] provide possible comparative data regarding phenotype, which is why this endogenous developmental gene was selected as a target for proof-of-principle TALEN in D. pulex.

The goal of this study was to develop a targeted gene disruption system by TALEN-mediated artificial DSBs in D. pulex. A TALEN target site was designed and assembled, and then TALEN mRNAs were microinjected into embryos to successfully induce insertion and/or deletion mutations.

Results and discussion

Construction and evaluation of DllTALENs

We first cloned and sequenced the partial sequence of the Dll gene in D. pulex, and then designed two pairs of TALENs, Dll_A and Dll_B, targeted to the first exon to induce a nonsense mutant protein (Figure 1). After constructing the TALENs by the Platinum Gate TALEN Kit, the activities of TALENs were evaluated by human cell-based single-strand annealing (SSA) assay [27] (Figure 2). Both Dll_A and Dll_B TALENs showed higher scores than the positive control ZFN [28], suggesting that both TALENs have DSB-inducing activities. We have evaluated the TALEN activities using human cells for various animal applications including sea urchin [29] and fruit fly [27],[30], suggesting that the activity score measured in human cells is, in principle, a good indication of the level of inducing DSBs in a wide range of animals. SSA assay can directly be performed with the constructed TALEN plasmids in human cells, so that we can easily know the quality of the constructed TALENs before making mRNAs and injecting them into the animals. We thus think the validation process with human cell-based SSA assay is beneficial to apply TALENs in animals including D. pulex.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The first exon nucleotide sequence of the D . pulex Dll gene. Two pairs of TALENs, Dll_A and Dll_B, were designed in the first exon (highlighted in gray). The spacer regions of Dll_A and Dll_B each contain 15 bp nucleotides. Underline indicates ATG start codon.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Activity evaluation of Dll _A and Dll _B TALENs by SSA assay. TALEN plasmids and the corresponding reporter plasmid, TALEN plasmids and unrelated reporter plasmid, or the reporter plasmid without TALEN plasmids were transfected into HEK293T cells. After the luciferase assay, fold activation scores against the positive control ZFN (pSTL-ZFA36 with the corresponding reporter) [28] were calculated. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3).

Detection of mutations and their sequences

Two pairs of Dll TALEN mRNAs were microinjected into eggs just after ovulation, and the genome modification efficiencies in vivo were evaluated by a T7 endonuclease I (T7EI) assay. We found that a signal intensity of undigested band in the TALEN-injected embryos was weaker than that in uninjected embryos (Figure 3A). Furthermore, multiple digested bands were detected in Dll_B-injected embryos, whereas only a slightly separated band was detected in Dll_A-injected embryos. We thus concluded that Dll_B exhibits higher genome modification efficiencies rather than Dll_A.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Detection of TALEN-induced mutations and their sequences. (A) Mutations in Dll were detected by T7EI assay. Arrowheads indicate the cleavage products generated in T7EI assay of F0 founders. (B) Sequence analysis of Dll mutant alleles in F0 founders induced by TALENs. The wild type (WT) sequence is shown at the top with the TALEN-binding sites (highlighted in gray). The number of nucleotides deleted (-) and inserted (+) is indicated in parentheses. (C) Sequence analysis of Dll mutant alleles in F2 embryos. Binding sites and insertions/deletions indicated as in (B).

To investigate the successful genome modifications of the F0 founder line, the genomic region surrounding the TALEN target was amplified and subcloned. Sequencing analysis revealed that TALENs predominantly induce small indel mutations ranging in size from 6-13 bp (Figure 3B), which is similar to results obtained in other arthropods [18]-[22]. In Dll_A-injected F0 founders, only two types of mutations, 6- and 9-nucleotide deletions, were detected. These mutations did not cause a frame shift and growth defect (see next section), suggesting that the gene function was not compromised. On the other hand, seven types of mutations were detected in Dll_B-injected F0 founders, five of which induced a frame shift leading to the appearance of a stop codon in the first exon. These mutations are predicted to result in a very short protein (83 amino acids) without a homeodomain, which is a functional DNA-binding domain and highly conserved among other arthropods. The variations of mutation patterns in Dll_B-injected F0 founders were higher than those in Dll_A-injected F0 founders, as expected from the T7EI assay. Based on these results, we conclude that the T7EI assay is a quick and easy method for estimating TALEN in vivo activity in F0 embryos of D. pulex.

To investigate whether these mutations were heritable, we then cloned and sequenced the target genomic region from F2 embryos. DNA sequencing revealed that inherited modifications existed in the two and one F2 lines injected with Dll_A and B, respectively (Figure 3C). Progeny from the same F0 founder had the same mutation genotype, indicating that the F0 founder carried a single germline mutation, not a mosaic germline mutation. Because cleavage proceeds without cytokinesis during injection period [31] and TALEN mRNAs can easily diffuse throughout the egg, it is considered that this method is able to induce mutation at very early developmental stages and easily establish mutant lines having a single germline mutation, without a need for complicated screening. In other words, mutation analysis can be carried out in a mere generation.

Phenotype of Dll TALEN in D. pulex

Results from TALEN experiments are summarized in Table 1. Compared to uninjected embryos, the low viability of the embryos injected with Dll TALEN mRNAs may be partly attributed to damage due to microinjection and/or toxicity of TALEN mRNAs, as well as the embryonic lethality of Dll knock-out mutants. The difference of viability and/or morphological phenotype among embryos injected with Dll_A or Dll_B might depend on their genetic phenotype, such as non-mosaic/mosaic, monoallelic/biallelic, and non-frame shift/frame shift mutations. When a half concentration of Dll_B (250 ng/μl) was injected, viability of injected embryos increased by 7.5% and two individuals did not have any prominent altered phenotypes, suggesting dose dependency of the TALENs on viability and phenotypes.
Table 1

Summary of TALEN results

Platinum TALENs

mRNAs concentration (ng/μl)

Injected embryos

Juveniles

Viability (%)

Shortened 2 ndantennae

Dll _A

500

88

36

40.9

0

Dll _B

500

206

63

30.6

63

 

250

134

51

38.1

49

Uninjected

-

130

107

82.3

0

Morphologically, the Dll_A injected embryos did not show any prominent altered phenotypes, and both homozygous and heterozygous non-frame shift mutations were detected in Dll loci. Hence, we assessed the phenotype of Dll_B-injected F0 founders hereafter. Similar to the RNAi knockdown phenotype of Dll [6], Dll_B-injected F0 founders displayed various degrees of defects in second antennae, appendages, ocellus, abdominal claw, and abdominal setae, all tissues in which Dll is normally expressed (Figure 4 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). In the second antennae, the degree of the segment truncation was variably detected, ranging from severe (peduncle alone, lacking dorsal and ventral rami) to mild (peduncle and deficient rami). The first to fifth thoracic appendages, including each exopodite, were shortened. Moreover, a loss of the ocellus and abdominal setae, and minimized abdominal claw, were observed in Dll_B-injected embryos. We found that the mutants with severe defects in the second antenna and appendage development have biallelic mutations, failed to molt, and died before becoming adults. The lethality of Dll knock-out mutants was in accordance with previous studies on insects [25],[32]. This easy and efficient induction of biallelic mutations by TALENs provides a valuable tool for parthenogenetic animals, including Daphnia, which are unable or poorly suited for conducting crossing experiments. In cases where monoallelic mutants are obtained, it is possible that the mutant line could be maintained and embryos reinjected with TALEN mRNAs to induce biallelic mutations.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Major Dll _B TALEN phenotypes. The left and right columns show representative phenotypes of uninjected controls and individuals injected with Dll_B mRNAs, respectively. (A, B) Lateral view of first instar juvenile. (C, D) Lateral view of the second antennae. (E, F) Second thoracic limb (T2). Dr, dorsal ramus; Ep, epipodite; En, endopodite; Ex, exopodite; Gn, gnathobase; Pe, peduncle; Vr, ventral ramus. Scale bars =200 μm in A, B; 100 μm in C, D and E, F.

Our results demonstrated that TALENs worked in D. pulex to induce heritable mutations into the endogenous genes. Moreover, TALENs can be used to induce more complicated mutagenesis other than micro-deletions or insertions. For example, Ma et al. [22] showed that simultaneous expression of two pairs of TALENs generates heritable large chromosomal deletions. Furthermore, Bedell et al. [33] and Zu et al. [34] demonstrated that co-injection of TALEN mRNAs and single-stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotides or donor vectors induced knock-in of small and large DNA fragments, respectively, into target loci via homologous recombination. All these technique based on TALENs will enable us to accurately define gene functions in D. pulex in future investigations.

Conclusions

We developed a TALEN-mediated gene targeting model in D. pulex. Targeted mutagenesis can be attained in early embryos by injecting the right and left TALEN mRNAs into eggs within 1 hour post-ovulation. The genome editing by Platinum TALENs presented here, together with the full-genome sequence and other developed molecular tools, may significantly promote the genetic tractability of D. pulex as an important model for environmental, evolutionary, and developmental genomics.

Methods

Daphniastrain and culture conditions

The D. pulex strain [West Trenton (WTN6), collected in May 2006 by Sarah Schaak] was obtained from the Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics (Indiana University, USA). The strains were maintained in dechlorinated tap water, which was aerated and filtered through activated carbon for 2 weeks, at 18°C under artificial light conditions of 14 h light and 10 h dark to maintain reproduction. A 0.01-ml suspension of 109 cells/ml Chlorella vulgaris was added every day to each culture (20-25 individuals/L). For rearing embryos, M4 culture medium (M4) was prepared using MilliQ water [35].

Cloning of Distal-less

Total RNA was extracted using an ISOGEN kit (NIPPON GENE, Tokyo, Japan), and converted to cDNA using Superscript III and random primers (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The Dll fragment was PCR amplified from the cDNA using a set of primers designed from the Dll sequence retrieved from wFleaBase http://wfleabase.org/ (Additional file 2: Table S1). Subsequently, the cDNA fragments were cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmids were sequenced using Sanger techniques that included the Big Dye terminator Ver. 3.1 (Life Technologies) on an ABI 3100 Avant or ABI 3130 Genetic Analyser DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems Japan Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).

TALEN target site design and assembly

The first exon sequences of Dll gene were scanned for potential TALEN target sites, which were identified using the TALEN Targeter program at https://tale-nt.cac.cornell.edu/node/add/talen. The following parameters were used: 1) spacer length: 12-16; 2) repeat array length of 15-20; 3) G substitute: NN; 4) Filter Options: Show all TALEN pairs (include redundant TALENs); 5) Streubel et al. guidelines: On. The Platinum Gate TALEN construction system described in Sakuma et al. [14] was used to assemble two pairs of TALENs, Dll_ A and Dll_ B (Figure 1), using the Platinum Gate TALEN Kit (Addgene, cat#1000000043). Assembled RVD repeats were as follows: HD NN NI HD NN NI HD NN HD HD HD NI NI NG NG HD for the left Dll_A TALEN, NN NG NG NN NG NG NN HD NG NN NN NG HD NN HD NI NI for the right Dll_A TALEN, HD NI NG HD HD NN NN NI HD NI NN HD NI NN HD NI NN for the left Dll_B TALEN, and NN HD NN NN HD NN NN HD HD NN HD NG NN HD NI NN HD for the right Dll_B TALEN. ptCMV-153/47-VR vectors (Addgene, included in the Platinum Gate TALEN Kit) were used as destination vectors.

Single-strand annealing (SSA) assay in human cells

Construction of the reporter plasmids and the SSA assay was performed as previously reported [27]. Briefly, the oligonucleotides listed in Additional file 3: Table S2 were annealed and inserted into pGL4-SSA vector (Addgene, Plasmid 42962) to construct the reporter plasmids. The TALEN plasmids and/or reporter plasmids were transfected into HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine LTX (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. At 24 hours post-transfection, a luciferase assay was performed using Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) and intensity of luminescence was measured with TriStar LB 941 plate reader (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany).

Injection of TALEN mRNAs into embryos

TALEN plasmid templates were linearized with Sma I (TaKaRa Bio, Shiga, Japan) and then transcribed in vitro using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Ultra kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resultant mRNAs were purified using a NucAway Spin Columns (Ambion) and extracted with water-saturated phenol/chloroform, and finally resuspended in RNase-free water. Equal amounts of the right and left TALEN mRNAs were mixed to a final concentration of 500 and 250 ng/μl for microinjection and stored at -80°C until use. TALEN mRNAs were injected into the embryos as described previously [6].

T7 endonuclease I (T7EI) assay

T7EI is a mismatch-resolving enzyme that can recognize heteroduplex DNAs and cleave DNA at single base pair mismatches. Thus TALEN-induced indel mutations can be detected. A pool of thirteen embryos collected at 48 h following injection with Dll_ A or Dll_B was used. Genomic DNA was isolated from TALEN-injected and uninjected embryos using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Additional file 2: Table S1 shows primers used to amplify the region containing the Dll target site from genomic DNA for T7EI assay and mutation analysis. PCR was performed using TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa Bio). Amplification conditions were: 98°C for 10 s, 56°C for 30 s, 72°C for 20 s, 45 cycles. T7 endonuclease I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) was added to PCR fragments and incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The samples were electrophoresed using 2% agarose gels.

Mutation analysis

To confirm the presence of TALEN-mediated mutations, genomic DNA of each individual was isolated separately from twelve F0 embryos and nine F2 embryos injected with Dll _A or Dll _B as described above. The target genomic region was amplified with TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa Bio). Amplification conditions were: 98°C for 1 min; 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 56°C for 30 s, 72°C for 20 s; 72°C for 1 min. The resulting fragments were subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) and then sequenced as described above. For observation of morphological changes, first instar animals were examined under a stereomicroscope (M165 FC; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and then fixed in ethanol and dissected with a pair of needles. The specimens were mounted in glycerin, observed by Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy (Axioplan 2; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and recorded by digital camera (DP72; Olympus). The terminology used herein for morphology follows the usage of Stachowitsch [36].

Additional files

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Daphnia pulex genomic sequence data were produced by The Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics at Indiana University and distributed via wFleaBase in collaboration with the Daphnia Genomics Consortium https://wiki.cgb.indiana.edu/display/DGC/Home. We thank Brenna Doheny for reviewing and editing the manuscript; members of the Iguchi laboratory for helpful advice and discussions; members of Yamamoto’s laboratory for assistance in TALEN construction. This work was supported by a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists to CH (No.12J04065), KT (No.12J05579), JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26840115 to CH, a grant from Ministry of the Environment, Japan and MEXT KAKENHI Grant Numbers 24657022, 24370029 to TI. Our work benefits from, and contributes to, the Daphnia Genomics Consortium.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Okazaki Institute for Integrative Bioscience, National Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Higashiyama 5-1, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8787 Aichi, Japan
(2)
Faculty of Life Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 5-1 Higashiyama, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8787 Aichi, Japan
(3)
Department of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan

References

  1. Tollrian R, Harvell CD: The Ecology And Evolution Of Inducible Defences. 1999, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Dodson SI, Hanazato T: Commentary on effects of anthropogenic and natural organic chemicals on development, swimming behavior, and reproduction of Daphnia, a key member of aquatic ecosystems. Environ Health Perspect. 1995, 103: 7-11. 10.1289/ehp.95103s47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Colbourne JK, Pfrender ME, Gilbert D, Thomas WK, Tucker A, Oakley TH, Tokishita S, Aerts A, Arnold GJ, Basu MK, Bauer DJ, Cáceres CE, Carmel L, Casola C, Choi J-H, Detter JC, Dong Q, Dusheyko S, Eads BD, Fröhlich T, Geiler-Samerotte KA, Gerlach D, Hatcher P, Jogdeo S, Krijgsveld J, Kriventseva EV, Kültz D, Laforsch C, Lindquist E, Lopez J, et al: The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex . Science. 2011, 331: 555-561. 10.1126/science.1197761.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gard AL, Lenz PH, Shaw JR, Christie AE: Identification of putative peptide paracrines/hormones in the water flea Daphnia pulex (Crustacea; Branchiopoda; Cladocera) using transcriptomics and immunohistochemistry. Gen Comp Endocr. 2009, 160: 271-287. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.12.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dircksen H, Neupert S, Predel R, Verleyen P, Huybrechts J, Strauss J, Hauser F, Stafflinger E, Schneider M, Pauwels K, Schoofs L, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP: Genomics, transcriptomics, and peptidomics of Daphnia pulex neuropeptides and protein hormones. J Proteome Res. 2011, 10: 4478-4504. 10.1021/pr200284e.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hiruta C, Toyota K, Miyakawa H, Ogino Y, Miyagawa S, Tatarazako N, Shaw JR, Iguchi T: Development of a microinjection system for RNA interference in the water flea Daphnia pulex . BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13: 96-10.1186/1472-6750-13-96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sakuma T, Woltjen K: Nuclease-mediated genome editing: At the front-line of functional genomics technology. Develop Growth Differ. 2014, 56: 2-13. 10.1111/dgd.12111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. DeFrancesco L: Move over ZFNs. Nat Biotechnol. 2011, 29: 681-684. 10.1038/nbt.1935.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF: ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31: 397-405. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, Landgraf A, Hahn S, Kay S, Lahaye T, Nickstadt A, Bonas U: Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-Type III effectors. Science. 2009, 326: 1509-1512. 10.1126/science.1178811.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Boch J, Bonas U: Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: discovery and function. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010, 48: 419-436. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081936.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Moscou MJ, Bogdanove AJ: A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors. Science. 2009, 326: 1501-10.1126/science.1178817.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF: TAL effectors: Customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science. 2011, 333: 1843-1846. 10.1126/science.1204094.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sakuma T, Ochiai H, Kaneko T, Mashimo T, Tokumasu D, Sakane Y, Suzuki K, Miyamoto T, Sakamoto N, Matsuura S, Yamamoto T: Repeating pattern of non-RVD variations in DNA-binding modules enhances TALEN activity. Sci Rep. 2013, 3: 3379-10.1038/srep03379.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, Wang J, Xia DF, Meng X, Paschon DE, Leung E, Hinkley SJ, Dulay GP, Hua KL, Ankoudinova I, Cost GJ, Urnov FD, Zhang HS, Holmes MC, Zhang L, Gregory PD, Rebar EJ: A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011, 29: 143-148. 10.1038/nbt.1755.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cermak T, Doyle EL, Christian M, Wang L, Zhang Y, Schmidt C, Baller JA, Somia NV, Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF: Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: e82-10.1093/nar/gkr218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Joung JK, Sander JD: TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013, 14: 49-55. 10.1038/nrm3486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu J, Li C, Yu Z, Huang P, Wu H, Wei C, Zhu N, Shen Y, Chen Y, Zhang B, Dend WM, Jiao R: Efficient and specific modifications of the Drosophila genome by means of an easy TALEN strategy. J Genet Genomics. 2012, 39: 209-215. 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.04.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Aryan A, Anderson MA, Myles KM, Adelman ZN: TALEN-based gene disruption in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti . PLoS One. 2013, 8: e60082-10.1371/journal.pone.0060082.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Smidler AL, Terenzi O, Soichot J, Levashina EA, Marois E: Targeted mutagenesis in the malaria mosquito using TALE nucleases. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e74511-10.1371/journal.pone.0074511.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Watanabe T, Ochiai H, Sakuma T, Horch HW, Hamaguchi N, Nakamura T, Bando T, Ohuchi H, Yamamoto T, Noji S, Mito T: Non-transgenic genome modifications in a hemimetabolous insect using zinc-finger and TAL effector nucleases. Nat Commun. 2012, 3: 1017-10.1038/ncomms2020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma S, Zhang S, Wang F, Liu Y, Liu Y, Xu H, Liu C, Lin Y, Zhao P, Xia Q: Highly efficient and specific genome editing in silkworm using custom TALENs. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e45035-10.1371/journal.pone.0045035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakanishi T, Kato Y, Matsuura T, Watanabe H: CRISPR/Cas-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Daphnia magna . PLoS One. 2014, 5: e98363-10.1371/journal.pone.0098363.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Panganiban G, Rubenstein JLR: Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes. Development. 2002, 129: 4371-4386.Google Scholar
  25. Beermann A, Jay DG, Beeman RW, Hulskamp M, Tautz D, Jurgens G: The Short antennae gene of Tribolium is required for limb development and encodes the orthologue of the Drosophila Distal-less protein. Development. 2001, 128: 287-297.Google Scholar
  26. Liubicich DM, Serano JM, Pavlopoulos A, Kontarakis Z, Protas ME, Kwan E, Chatterjee S, Tran KD, Averof M, Patel NH: Knockdown of Parhyale Ultrabithorax recapitulates evolutionary changes in crustacean appendage morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 13892-13896. 10.1073/pnas.0903105106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sakuma T, Hosoi S, Woltjen K, Suzuki K, Kashiwagi K, Wada H, Ochiai H, Miyamoto T, Kawai N, Sasakura Y, Matsuura S, Okada Y, Kawahara A, Hayashi S, Yamamoto T: Efficient TALEN construction and evaluation methods for human cell and animal applications. Genes Cells. 2013, 18: 315-326. 10.1111/gtc.12037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ochiai H, Fujita K, Suzuki K, Nishikawa M, Shibata T, Sakamoto N, Yamamoto T: Targeted mutagenesis in the sea urchin embryo using zinc-finger nucleases. Genes Cells. 2010, 15: 875-885.Google Scholar
  29. Hosoi S, Sakuma T, Sakamoto N, Yamamoto T: Targeted mutagenesis in sea urchin embryos using TALENs. Dev Growth Differ. 2014, 56: 92-97. 10.1111/dgd.12099.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kondo T, Sakuma T, Wada H, Akimoto-Kato A, Yamamoto T, Hayashi S: TALEN-induced gene knock out in Drosophila . Dev Growth Differ. 2014, 56: 86-91. 10.1111/dgd.12097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hiruta C, Nishida C, Tochinai S: Abortive meiosis in the oogenesis of parthenogenetic Daphnia pulex . Chromosome Res. 2010, 18: 833-840. 10.1007/s10577-010-9159-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Cohen SM, Jurgens G: Proximal-distal pattern formation in Drosophila: cell autonomous requirement for Distal-less gene activity in limb development. EMBO J. 1989, 8: 2045-2055.Google Scholar
  33. Bedell V, Wang Y, Campbell JM, Poshusta TL, Starker CG, Krug RG, Tan W, Penheiter SG, Ma AC, Leung AYH, Fahrenkrug SC, Carlson DF, Voytas DF, Clark KJ, Essner JJ, Ekker SC: In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature. 2012, 491: 114-118. 10.1038/nature11537.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zu Y, Tong X, Wang Z, Liu D, Pan R, Li Z, Hu Y, Luo Z, Huang P, Wu Q, Zhu Z, Zhang B, Lin S: TALEN-mediated precise genome modification by homologous recombination in zebrafish. Nat Methods. 2013, 10: 329-331. 10.1038/nmeth.2374.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Elendt BP, Bias WR: Trace nutrient deficiency in Daphnia magna cultured in standard medium for toxity testing: effects of the optimization of culture conditions on life history parameters of D. magna . Water Res. 1990, 24: 1157-1167. 10.1016/0043-1354(90)90180-E.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Stachowitsch M: The Invertebrates: An Illustrated Glossary. 1992, Wiley-Liss Division, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hiruta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us