- Methodology article
- Open access
- Published:
The Flp double cross system a simple efficient procedure for cloning DNA fragments
BMC Biotechnology volume 3, Article number: 9 (2003)
Abstract
Background
While conventional cloning methods using restriction enzymes and polynucleotide ligase are adequate for most DNAs, fragments made by the polymerase chain reaction are difficult to clone because the amplifying DNA polymerase tends to add untemplated nucleotides to the 3'-termini of the amplified strands. Conservative site-specific recombinases offer an efficient alternative to conventional cloning methods.
Results
In this paper I describe the use of the Flp site-specific recombinase for cloning PCR-amplified fragments. A DNA fragment is amplified with primers that contain at their ends inverted target sequences for Flp. Flp readily recombines these fragments in vitro into a vector that also contains two inverted Flp target sequences surrounding the α-complementing region of the lacZ gene of E. coli. The recombinants are conveniently detected as white colonies by the familiar blue/white screening test for lacZ activity. A useful feature of the system is that both orientations of the inserted DNA are usually obtained. If the recipient vector is cut between the two inverted Flp targets, Flp "heals" the double-strand break by inserting a linear fragment flanked by Flp targets.
Conclusion
This system ("The Flp Double Cross System") should be useful for cloning multiple PCR fragments into many sites in several vectors. It has certain advantages over other available recombinase-based cloning procedures.
Background
Cloning of DNA fragments is usually done by cleaving DNA and a vector with restriction enzymes, ligating the DNA molecules together and screening transformed bacteria for the desired recombinants [1]. The advent of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has facilitated the amplification of any piece of DNA whose sequence is at least partly known [2]. It is often desirable to clone directly a PCR fragment but because the amplifying DNA polymerase frequently adds extra residues to the 3' termini [3, 4], one must commonly cut the fragment with a restriction enzyme or clone it into a special vector that contains protrusions that are complementary to the extended termini on the PCR fragment.
Conservative site-specific recombinases catalyze rearrangements of DNA at specific sequences [5–7]. They cleave and covalently attach to their target sites (for example, the Flp recognition target, FRT site, see Fig. 1a) and they are able to recombine DNA with exquisite fidelity and very high efficiency.
Members of the integrase family of recombinases such as Cre of phage P1 and Flp of the yeast 2 μM plasmid have been extensively used in vivo to engineer the genomes of several organisms [8, 9]. Such tools have been powerful adjuncts to the study of development. Recently, members of the Integrase family have also been used for cloning DNA fragments in vitro [10, 11]. While efficient, these systems require the prior construction of vectors and genetic selections to remove undesired products.
I describe here an in vitro system in which PCR fragments bearing two inverted targets of the Flp recombinase (FRT sites) are recombined by the Flp protein into a vector that also contains two inverted FRT sites. Bacterial colonies containing the desired recombinants can be readily identified using the familiar blue/ white screening technique for the presence or absence of β-galactosidase [12, 13].
Results
Rationale of the cloning system
I sought to develop a procedure that would facilitate the cloning of many PCR fragments into any vector. Commercially available systems [14] depend upon the availability of the particular vector from the supplier.
The present system (Fig. 1b) requires only that the user clones into the desired target site a receptor cassette that consists of the lac operator/promoter region and the alpha-complementing N-terminus of the beta galactosidase gene surrounded by two inversely oriented FRT sites. Bacterial colonies containing the receptor vector stain blue in the presence of X-Gal dye [12, 15]. One then amplifies the desired fragment with primers that contain terminal inversely oriented FRT sites. Flp catalyzes an efficient double crossover event between the PCR fragment and the receptor lacZ cassette causing replacement of the latter with the PCR fragment. The DNA is used to transform a suitable host and the colonies containing the recombinant clones are white when plated in the presence of X-Gal. A secondary benefit of this procedure derives from the fact that the FRT sites are in inverse orientation; once the fragment is inserted, Flp cannot cut it out again although it can readily invert it so that one will usually obtain the desired fragment cloned in both orientations [7]. This is in contrast to several cloning systems that rely upon the (reversible) formation of recombinase-catalyzed replicon fusions.
Cloning of the lacZFRT cassette into plasmid pBA128
In order to create a test plasmid, I used PCR primers 1 and 2 (Table 1) to amplify a 398 bp sequence of the E. coli lac operon. In addition to the lac sequences, the primers contained two inversely oriented, 48 bp FRT sites as well as 23 nucleotides of 'buffer' sequence at their 5' termini. These buffer sequences contained three restriction enzyme recognition sequences (AscI, SalI and NdeI) to facilitate conventional cloning into other vectors although they were not used here. Primers 1 and 2 also contained a BamHI and an EcoRI recognition site, respectively located 3' to the FRT sites to facilitate the determination of the orientation of the insert. This 592 bp fragment is called the "lacZ(FRT)2 cassette".
To create a test receptor plasmid molecule I used Flp itself to recombine the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette into plasmid pBA128 (Fig. 2a). This pUC9-based plasmid contains two inversely oriented FRT sites 667 bp apart (Brenda J. Andrews, unpublished). I incubated pBA128 DNA (100–1000 ng, 15–150 nM of symmetry elements), the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette (100 ng, 100 nM symmetry elements) and purified Flp protein (140 ng, 200 nM) together. The recombinant plasmids changed the color of the colonies containing them from white to blue. Flp catalyzed the appearance of blue colonies that was dependent upon the presence of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette. No blue colonies were obtained in the absence of the cassette or in the absence of Flp (data not shown). The frequency of blue colonies varied between 1 and 10%, depending on the relative concentrations of the vector and the fragment. One μg of vector yielded 42 blue colonies (2790 colonies total; 1.5%) whereas 100 ng of vector gave 55 blue out of 570 total colonies (9.6%). Restriction analysis showed that DNA isolated from blue colonies had the pattern expected of a Flp-mediated insertion of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette, creating plasmid "p128lacZ" (data not shown). Furthermore the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette was inserted in both orientations with equal frequency. The plasmid DNA isolated from white colonies was the expected parental pBA128 DNA.
Although I used Flp to clone the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette into the pBA128 vector, the cassette can also readily be cloned into any suitable restriction site in any vector by conventional techniques. After transformation of a suitable host, the desired blue colonies are easily identified.
Use of p128-lacZ plasmid for cloning of other PCR fragments
In order to show that the p128lacZ plasmid could serve as a receptor for other PCR fragments, I amplified a 1.5 Kb fragment of human DNA from the intron 10 of the KCNQ1 gene on chromosome 11. Recombination of this fragment into p128lacZ was expected to create the two isoforms (See Fig. 3a). The primers also contained the same FRT sites and buffer sequences as those on the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette (primers 3 and 4, Table 1).
Analysis of the DNA from 8 white colonies obtained from the incubation with the KCNQ1 fragment showed that 6 of them contained an insert of the expected 1.6 Kb size when the DNA was cut with XbaI, an enzyme that cuts within the FRT sites (Fig. 3b, lanes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9). The frequency of white colonies for this fragment was about 1%. Furthermore I confirmed by digestion with EcoRI that the experiment yielded approximately equal numbers of each orientation of the insertions (2 'A' isolates {Fig. 3c, lanes 3 and 6} and 4 'B' isolates {Fig. 3c, lanes 2, 4, 5, 7}. These experiments show that Flp can recombine a PCR fragment containing inverted FRT sites into a receptor vector containing an indicator lacZ(FRT)2 cassette. A simple and familiar color screen yields a high frequency of recombinants in both orientations.
Use of linear receptor vector containing inverted FRT sites
It is well known that linearizing a circular DNA plasmid markedly reduces its efficiency of transformation of bacteria. It seemed possible that a linear plasmid containing two inverted FRT sites, one at each end, might be "healed" by a double crossover between the plasmid and a linear fragment catalyzed by Flp. The result would be a circular plasmid containing the insert identical to the fragment. I therefore linearized plasmid pBA128 by cutting it between the two inverted FRT sites with PstI (Fig. 4a). The plasmid was then incubated in the presence of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette and Flp and the DNA was used to transform XL1-Blue competent E. coli cells. There was a large increase in the proportion of blue colonies that was dependent upon Flp and the presence of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette (Table 2). Linearization of the plasmid caused a 30-fold decrease in the transformation efficiency. Flp significantly reduced the transformation efficiency further, an effect that was mitigated by inclusion of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette in the reaction. This may have been due to the presence of exonuclease in the Flp preparation although the reactions were done in the absence of divalent metal. Furthermore, highly purified homogeneous Flp gave the same results. Importantly inclusion of the lacZ cassette in the reaction with Flp caused the appearance of greater than 50% of blue colonies. The appearance of blue colonies was dependent on inclusion of the lacZ cassette in the reaction (Table 2) and on the inclusion of Flp in the reaction (data not shown). The latter experiment excludes the possibility that the recombinants are being formed in E. coli in vivo.
To confirm that the transformants contained plasmids with the expected structure, I isolated DNA from 5 blue colonies and subjected it to digestion with XbaI and EcoRI. The results showed that all 5 of 5 blue colonies assayed contained DNA that gave the expected patterns of digestion for insertion of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette (Figure 4a). As seen in Fig. 4b, all 5 isolates showed the expected 500 bp band upon digestion with XbaI (lanes 4–8). Furthermore the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette was inserted in both orientations (Fig 4c, 'A' orientation lanes 4, 7; 'B' orientation, lanes 5, 6, 8). Similar results were obtained with two other linear plasmids that contained a cloned KCNQ1 cassette (data not shown).
Discussion
Advantages of Flp Double cross System
In this paper I describe a simple cloning procedure that uses Flp to recombine fragments of DNA that contain inverted FRT sites into a receptor vector that contains similarly oriented FRT targets. These FRT sites flank a cassette that imparts a color to transformant colonies, in this case the alpha-complementing fragment of lacZ that imparts a blue color. The system has several advantages over present cloning strategies, especially for the cloning of multiple PCR fragments into the same site of a vector. Firstly, because of the high specificity and simple requirements of Flp, the reaction is highly efficient. Since conservative site-specific recombinases like Flp attach covalently to their DNA substrate via a hydoxylated amino acid (tyrosine for members of the integrase family) no high-energy cofactor such as ATP is required. Furthermore Flp performs its reactions without the need for accessory factors such as those required by the lambda integrase (the host-coded IHF and the phage-coded Xis [6].
Secondly, Flp catalyzes intramolecular excision or inversion reactions on DNA molecules containing two FRT sites as well as intermolecular reactions between molecules containing FRT sites [7]. The system described here uses the ability of Flp to catalyze two intermolecular reactions (or perhaps one intermolecular reaction followed by an intramolecular reaction) and thereby to insert a fragment into the receptor plasmid. Once the double crossover has occurred, Flp cannot excise the insert from the plasmid because the FRT sites are in inverted orientation. A useful feature of this system is that Flp efficiently will invert the insert between the FRT sites with the result that one almost always obtains both orientations of the insertion. This can be very helpful in examining the orientation-dependence of a cis-acting sequence or in generating sense and antisense RNA probes.
Thirdly, the Flp double cross system is simple in concept and in execution. It uses the familiar blue-white screening technique to identify the desired recombinant clones. It is therefore adaptable to the cloning of any fragments into any site in any vector. The prerequisites are the construction of a single vector that contains the PCR-amplified lacZ(FRT)2 cassette by conventional cloning and a source of Flp. The receptor vector can be used to clone many fragments that have been amplified using primers containing terminal FRT sites. Although Flp is not available commercially and is not produced abundantly in E. coli when histidine-tagged (A. Shaikh and P.D. Sadowski, unpublished), nevertheless, ample amounts for the cloning method described here can be made in a 2-column procedure [16]. A two-column procedure for purifying His-tagged mutant Flpe protein was recently described [17].
Comparison with Other Recombinase-based Cloning Systems
The Flp double cross system has advantages over currently available cloning systems that use site-specific recombinases or topoisomerase. The Gateway™ cloning system of Invitrogen [10] uses the lambda integrase reaction to transfer a gene of interest flanked by attL sites from an "entry clone" into a "destination vector". While elegant in its design, this system may be conceptually difficult for the non-expert to understand. Furthermore it requires the prior construction of the entry clone by the user and depends on the availability of the appropriate destination vector from the vendor. The Flp system is simple to understand and to execute and requires only the construction of a single receptor vector by the user.
Invitrogen and Clontech also sell a Cre-based cloning system (The Echo™ Cloning System and the Creator™ Gene Cloning and Expression System, respectively). Both require the construction of donor vectors, the purchase of acceptor vectors and genetic selections because of the ready reversibility of the Cre reactions. The Flp double cross system circumvents the reversibility problem by using two inverted FRT sites. Because of the high efficiency, a simple color screen suffices to detect the desired recombinants. Invitrogen also markets the TOPO® Cloning System [14] that uses a vector containing topoisomerase that is covalently attached to ligate the PCR fragment to the vector. While highly efficient, it depends on the availability of the appropriate topoisomerase-containing vectors from the vendor.
Improvements to the System
In the present experiments I used primers that contained the full 48 bp sequence of the FRT site flanked by 23 nucleotides of 'buffer' sequence. Thus the PCR primers are rather long and hence expensive. It is likely that the primers could be substantially shortened by deleting the buffer sequences and/or the 'c' symmetry element. It is well known that the third 13 bp symmetry element ('c', See Fig. 1a) is not needed for efficient recombination by Flp in vivo and in vitro [18, 19]. The FRT site contains a near-perfect 13 bp palindrome, (the a and b symmetry elements, Figure 1a) which may cause unpredicted effects when the vector is used. Control experiments are needed to exclude such effects that may be attributable to the FRT sites. A detailed study of the importance of each position in the symmetry elements to the Flp recombination reaction has been carried out [20]. It should be possible using these studies as well as the recent co-crystal structure of Flp and the FRT site [21] to design FRT sites that would be functional and yet not interfere with translation or other processes. Likewise it should be possible to design a functional FRT site that is not palindromic. A selection system for Flp variants with altered FRT site specificity has recently been described [22]. Directional insertions could also be achieved using directly oriented FRT sites that have non-homologous spacer regions.
Although I chose the lacZ α-complementation system as the indicator because of its familiarity and convenience, other indicator systems are possible. For example, I amplified a PCR fragment containing the green fluorescent protein [23] driven by the lac promoter and flanked by inverted FRT sites. Flp recombined this fragment into the pBA128 vector. The recombinants were easily detected as green fluorescent colonies under long-wavelength ultraviolet light. However the green fluorescent protein expressed from the lac promoter seemed to be toxic to the E. coli cells. Further experiments are being done with this system. In developing the test system I made extensive use of the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette that functioned rather efficiently. It is my experience that different PCR fragments recombined with different efficiencies. For example the KCNQ1 fragment, which is a part of CpG island from human DNA did not recombine as efficiently as the lacZ(FRT)2 cassette. The reasons for the variability in cloning efficiencies are being investigated.
Conclusion
The present paper describes a simple and efficient cloning strategy using the Flp recombinase. The method has certain advantages over currently available commercial procedures and may be extended to other recombinases; it could be applied in vivo. The vectors and Flp protein used in this paper are available from the author.
Methods
Media and growth conditions
Bacteria were grown in LB medium supplemented with 100 μg per ml of ampicillin according to standard methods [1]. Competent E. coli XL1-Blue cells (recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac [F' proAB lacIq ZΔM15 Tn10 (Tetr)]) were purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA, USA, cat. # 200249). Transformation and staining colonies for beta galactosidase with X-Gal were done according to the manufacturer's instructions.
DNA isolation
Plasmid pBA128 is a derivative of plasmid pBA 112 [24] into which a 912 bp Hind III fragment of the 2 μM plasmid (nt #s105-1017) was inserted into the HindIII site. The two FRT sites are in inverted orientation with respect to one another. The plasmid DNA was isolated as described previously [25]. Small-scale preparations of plasmid DNAs were done using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (QIAGEN Inc, Valencia, CA, USA) or the alkaline-iodine lysis procedure [26]. PCR fragments were purified from agarose gels using the QIAGEN QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit. PAC DJ74K15 DNA (Accession no.90095) was isolated from E. coli DH10B (Δ(mrr-hsd RMS-mcrBC)mcrA recA1) containing PAC DJ74K15 DNA by the alkaline lysis method followed by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation [27]. E. coli DNA was isolated from strain N99 (galk2, strepr) [28] and was the gift of Dr. Barbara Funnell.
Enzymes
Flp (70% pure) was purified as described [16] up to the Sephacryl S300 step. Restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverley, MA, USA) and were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Taq DNA polymerase, PCRx enhancer and PCRx enhancer buffer solution, MgSO4, deoxynucleoside triphosphates and oligodeoxynulcleotide primers (see table 1) were purchased from GibcoBRL(now Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The primers were desalted and used without further purification.
PCR amplification conditions
i) LacZ. The reaction mixtures (50 μl) contained 1xPCRx Enhancer buffer, 3 mM MgSO4, 0.25 mM of each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 4 μM of each of primers 1 and 2, see Table 1), 100 ng of E. coli DNA and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase. The cycling conditions were: 95°, 2 min, {95°, 45 sec, 55°, 50 sec, 72°, 2 min} repeated 30 times, 72°, 10 min, cool to 4°.
ii) KCNQ1. The reaction mixtures (50 μl) were the same as above except contained 4 μM of each of primers 3 and 4, (Table 1) and 20 ng of PAC DJ74K15 DNA. The cycling conditions were: 95°, 2 min, {95°, 45 sec, 60°, 45 sec, 72°, 2 min} repeated 30 times, 72°, 10 min, cool to 4°.
Agarose gel electrophoresis
Agarose gels (1.5%, w/v) were run in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 [13] and stained with ethidium bromide.
Flp double cross reactions
The reaction mixtures (10 μl) contained 50 mM Tris-Cl buffer, pH 7.4, 33 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 100 ng (~0.15 pmol {15 nM} of symmetry elements), or 1000 ng (1.5 pmol {150 nM} symmetry elements) of plasmid substrate and ~100 ng of PCR fragment (1.0 pmol {100 nM} of symmetry elements for LacZ cassette; 0.375 pmol {37.5 nM} of symmetry elements for the KCNQ1 fragment) and 140 ng of S300 Flp preparation, (2 pmol of protein, 200 nM). Reactions were incubated for 30 min at 30°, heated at 65° for 5 min and then chilled on ice. One μl aliquots were used to transform 2-mercaptoethanol-treated competent XL1-Blue cells (Stratagene).
Abbreviations
- Bp:
-
base pair(s)
- IPTG:
-
isopropylthio-β-D-galactoside
- nt (s):
-
nucleotide(s)
- PCR:
-
polymerase chain reaction
- X-Gal:
-
5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-β-D-Galactoside.
References
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, eds: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2
Mullis K, Faloona F, Scharf S, Saiki R, Horn G, Erlich H: Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1986, 51: 263-73.
Hu G: DNA polymerase-catalyzed addition of nontemplated extra nucleotides to the 3' end of a DNA fragment. DNA Cell Biol. 1993, 12: 763-70.
Clark JM: Novel non-templated nucleotide addition reactions catalyzed by procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 9677-86.
Craig NL: The mechanism of conservative site-specific recombination. Annual Review of Genetics. 1988, 22: 77-105. 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.000453.
Landy A: Dynamic, structural, and regulatory aspects of lambda site-specific recombination. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1989, 58: 913-49.
Sadowski PD: The Flp recombinase of the 2-micron plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Progress in Nucleic Acid Research & Molecular Biology. 1995, 51: 53-91.
Sauer B, Henderson N: Targeted insertion of exogenous DNA into the eukaryotic genome by the Cre recombinase. New Biologist. 1990, 2: 441-9.
Golic KG, Golic MM: Engineering the Drosophila genome: chromosome rearrangements by design. Genetics. 1996, 144: 1693-711.
Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA: DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 1788-95. 10.1101/gr.143000.
Walhout AJ, Temple GF, Brasch MA, Hartley JL, Lorson MA, van den Heuvel S, Vidal M: GATEWAY recombinational cloning: application to the cloning of large numbers of open reading frames or ORFeomes. Methods Enzymol. 2000, 328: 575-92.
Ullmann A, Jacob F, Monod J: Characterization by in vitro complementation of a peptide corresponding to an operator-proximal segment of the beta-galactosidase structural gene of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1967, 24: 339-43. 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90341-5.
Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press, Third
Shuman S: Novel approach to molecular cloning and polynucleotide synthesis using vaccinia DNA topoisomerase. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 32678-84.
Davies J, Jacob F: Genetic mapping of the regulator and operator genes of the lac operon. J Mol Biol. 1968, 36: 413-7. 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90165-4.
Pan H, Clary D, Sadowski PD: Identification of the DNA-binding domain of the FLP recombinase. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 11347-54.
Chen Y, Rice PA: The Role of the Conserved Trp330 in Flp-mediated Recombination. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 24800-24807. 10.1074/jbc.M300853200.
Jayaram M: Two-micrometer circle site-specific recombination: the minimal substrate and the possible role of flanking sequences. PNAS. 1985, 82: 5875-9.
Proteau G, Sidenberg D, Sadowski P: The minimal duplex DNA sequence required for site-specific recombination promoted by the FLP protein of yeast in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986, 14: 4787-802.
Senecoff JF, Rossmeissl PJ, Cox MM: DNA recognition by the FLP recombinase of the yeast 2 mu plasmid. A mutational analysis of the FLP binding site. JMB. 1988, 201: 405-21. 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90147-7.
Chen Y, Narendra U, Iype LE, Cox MM, Rice PA: Crystal Structure of a Flp Recombinase-Holliday Junction Complex. Assembly of an Active Oligomer by Helix Swapping. Mol Cell. 2000, 6: 885-897.
Voziyanov Y, Stewart AF, Jayaram M: A dual reporter screening system identifies the amino acid at position 82 in Flp site-specific recombinase as a determinant for target specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 1656-63. 10.1093/nar/30.7.1656.
Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ: Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene. 1992, 111: 229-33. 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90691-H.
Andrews BJ, Proteau GA, Beatty LG, Sadowski PD: The FLP recombinase of the 2 micron circle DNA of yeast: interaction with its target sequences. Cell. 1985, 40: 795-803. 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90339-3.
Babineau D, Vetter D, Andrews BJ, Gronostajski RM, Proteau GA, Beatty LG, Sadowski PD: The FLP protein of the 2-micron plasmid of yeast. Purification of the protein from Escherichia coli cells expressing the cloned FLP gene. J Biol Chem. 1985, 260: 12313-9.
Pulleyblank DE: Method for nucleic acid purification using iodine. In: Book Method for nucleic acid purification using iodine. 2001, City
Birnboim HC, Doly J: A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979, 7: 1513-23.
Funnell BE, Gagnier L: Partition of P1 plasmids in Escherichia coli mukB chromosomal partition mutants. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 2381-6.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research. I thank Brenda Andrews for constructing the plasmid pBA128 and Bri Lavoie for suggesting the use of linear vectors for Flp cloning. I thank Barbara Funnell for helpful discussions and for the gift of E. coli DNA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author's contributions
I performed all the experiments described here. Flp protein was made by Donna Clary. See also Acknowledgements below.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadowski, P.D. The Flp double cross system a simple efficient procedure for cloning DNA fragments. BMC Biotechnol 3, 9 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-3-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-3-9