Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research article
  • Open Access

One single method to produce native and Tat-fused recombinant human α-synuclein in Escherichia coli

BMC Biotechnology201313:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-32

©  Caldinelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 19 September 2012
  • Accepted: 25 March 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Human α-synuclein is a small-sized, natively unfolded protein that in fibrillar form is the primary component of Lewy bodies, the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease. Experimental evidence suggests that α-synuclein aggregation is the key event that triggers neurotoxicity although additional findings have proposed a protective role of α-synuclein against oxidative stress. One way to address the mechanism of this protective action is to evaluate α-synuclein-mediated protection by delivering this protein inside cells using a chimeric protein fused with the Tat-transduction domain of HIV Tat, named TAT-α-synuclein.

Results

A reliable protocol was designed to efficiently express and purify two different forms of human α-synuclein. The synthetic cDNAs encoding for the native α-synuclein and the fusion protein with the transduction domain of Tat protein from HIV were overexpressed in a BL21(DE3) E. coli strain as His-tagged proteins. The recombinant proteins largely localized (≥ 85%) to the periplasmic space. By using a quick purification protocol, based on recovery of periplasmic space content and metal-chelating chromatography, the recombinant α-synuclein protein forms could be purified in a single step to ≥ 95% purity. Both α-synuclein recombinant proteins form fibrils and the TAT-α-synuclein is also cytotoxic in the micromolar concentration range.

Conclusions

To further characterize the molecular mechanisms of α-synuclein neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo and to evaluate the relevance of extracellular α-synuclein for the pathogenesis and progression of Parkinson’s disease, a suitable method to produce different high-quality forms of this pathological protein is required. Our optimized expression and purification procedure offers an easier and faster means of producing different forms (i.e., both the native and the TAT-fusion form) of soluble recombinant α-synuclein than previously described procedures.

Keywords

  • α-Synuclein
  • TAT-fusion protein
  • Recombinant proteins
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Oxidative stress
  • Protein aggregation

Background

Human α-synuclein (AS) is a 140-residue, natively unfolded protein that in fibrillar form is the primary component of Lewy bodies, the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1]. PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disease resulting from the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the brain: it affects ≈ 2% of the population over the age of 65.

A structural and physiological understanding of AS fibrils at the molecular level is critical for finding cures for PD. Some evidence suggests that AS aggregation is the key event that triggers AS-mediated neurotoxicity [2, 3]. However, other experimental data proposed a protective role of AS against oxidative stress (a major feature of PD) [4]. To investigate the exact mechanism underlying this protective action, as well as the role of AS pathogenetic mutations, different research groups developed in vitro models of oxidative stress based on the exposure of selected cells to stress (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, 6-hydroxydopamine, or serum deprivation) and evaluated AS-mediated protection by delivering AS inside cells using the fusion protein TAT-AS (for details, see below) [5]. These studies established that nanomolar amounts of TAT-AS protected against stress and increased Hsp70 protein levels, whereas micromolar amounts of the protein were intrinsically toxic to cells and decreased Hsp70 at the protein level.

Recombinant AS has been produced in Escherichia coli since 1994 [6] by different methods which employ whole-cells extract as the protein source [7], followed by ammonium sulfate or acid precipitation and successive chromatographic steps [8, 9]. Alternative strategies are based on the design of fusion proteins - for example, with the glutathione S-transferase or the chitin binding domain - and the use of specific enzymes for releasing the fused AS [10, 11]. Most recently, AS has been overexpressed within E. coli periplasm and from this compartment it was recovered in the native form by only two purification steps [12]. AS was also produced as recombinant protein fused with transduction domain of Tat protein from HIV. In fact, it was demonstrated that heterologous proteins chemically crosslinked to a domain of Tat protein from HIV were able to transduce into cells [13]: accordingly, this method become widely used because full-length proteins can be rapidly introduced into primary and immortalized cells. The fusion proteins can be directly added to cell culture [14, 15] or injected in vivo into mice [16]. Protein transduction occurs in a concentration-dependent manner, requires at least one hour to achieve maximum intracellular concentrations with nearly equal intracellular concentrations among all cells in the transduced population and the uptake does not depend on the cell type used [17, 18]. The technology requires the synthesis of a fusion protein, linking the transduction domain (the minimal transduction domain is represented by residues 47–57 of HIV Tat, named TAT) [16] to the molecule of interest by using a bacterial expression vector, followed by the purification of this fusion protein under either soluble or denaturing conditions. For a review, see [19, 20]. TAT-AS was previously produced by expressing pTAT/pTAT-HA in a BL21(DE3)pLysS E. coli strain [5]. It was purified from a washed bacterial pellet suspended in 8 M urea followed by metal affinity chromatography on a Ni-NTA chelating column because of the hexahistidine tag added during the cloning procedure, following the guidelines reported in [17].

To provide a tool to further characterize the molecular mechanisms of AS neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo and to evaluate the relevance for PD pathogenesis and progression of extracellular AS, we focused on setting up a fast, simple, and inexpensive method of producing high-quality AS, both the native and the TAT-fusion AS form.

Results and discussion

Expression of recombinant AS in E. coli

Synthetic cDNA encoding for native or TAT-AS (GenBank code KC609369 and KC609370, respectively) was subcloned into pET11a plasmid, giving a construct encoding for a protein that was 148- and 170-amino acids in length (AS or TAT-AS, of 15.5 or 17.8 kDa), both containing an N-terminal His-tag.

In order to optimize AS expression, several experimental parameters were modified at the flask scale using LB medium: IPTG concentration (0, 0.1, or 0.5 mM), growth phase at induction (OD600nm = 0.4 or 0.8), and time of cell harvest after adding IPTG (up to 24 hours). Varying incubation times after adding IPTG significantly affects expression of both AS recombinant forms obtaining maximum protein production after five hours interval; no AS production is observed before IPTG is added (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Comparatively slightly higher (≈ 1.3-fold) amounts of AS are produced if expression is induced at an OD600nm ≈ 0.4 than at the later exponential phase of growth. No increase in AS expression level was observed using a richer medium (i.e. YT and SB media) or decreasing the temperature of growth after IPTG addition. The latter observation agrees with previous studies that reported the highest production of recombinant AS at 37°C [12, 21]: the rationale for the lack of temperature dependence is probably an effect of the small size of the investigated protein [22]. Taken together, Western blot analysis shows that the highest production of both native AS and TAT-AS in E. coli (≈ 35 and 22 mg per liter of fermentation broth, respectively) is observed by growing the cells in LB medium to an OD600nm = 0.4, adding 0.1 mM IPTG, and growing for another 5 hours at 37°C. The best conditions set-up was then scaled up to a 2-L flask level containing 500 mL of LB broth.

The overexpressed native and TAT-AS are largely (≥ 85%) produced as soluble proteins, as demonstrated by SDS-PAGE of soluble and insoluble cell content following sonication (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). Indeed, recombinant AS is largely targeted to the periplasmic space where it represents ≈ 70% of the whole protein content (Additional file 1: Figure S2B). In fact, although no signal sequence is apparent for translocation into the periplasmic space, the C-terminal 99-to-140 portion of the protein plays a signal-like role, cooperating with the central 61-to-95 protein region [23].

Purification and characterization of recombinant AS

Starting from 2 L of fermentation broth, native AS was purified by employing only two steps: osmotic shock to recover the periplasmic space content followed by chromatography on a HiTrap chelating column. As shown in Figure 1A, following preliminary washing steps at 5-10% of elution buffer (i.e., 25–50 mM imidazole), the recombinant AS is eluted at 100% of elution buffer as a single, narrow peak. An overall yield of ≈ 16 mg native AS/L of fermentation broth is achieved with a > 95% purity of the final preparation as judged by SDS–PAGE (Figure 1B). Interestingly, TAT-AS could also be purified to a high degree under the same experimental conditions (> 95%, see Figure 1B) and gave a yield of up to 12 mg/L of fermentation broth (Table 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Representative purification of recombinant native AS on HiTrap chelating column (5 mL). A) An amount of periplasmic sample corresponding to 2 L of fermentation broth was loaded and eluted in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 1 M NaCl. Following two washing steps at 5 and 10% of elution buffer to remove proteins aspecifically bound to the column, AS was eluted with 500 mM imidazole in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4 (elution buffer). B) SDS-PAGE analysis of fractions eluted from HiTrap chelating column. P and PS: cell pellet after osmotic shock and periplasmic space content (both corresponding to 0.2 mL of fermentation broth); 0%, 5% and 100%: fractions eluted at different percentage of elution buffer; M: molecular mass standard proteins (GE Healthcare). TAT-AS: purified TAT-AS recombinant protein eluted at 100% of elution buffer.

Table 1

Purification of native AS and TAT-AS from E. coli starting from 1 L culture (≈ 2.5 g cell paste)

Purification step

Total protein (mg)

AS (mg)

AS purity a(%)

Yield b(%)

Whole cell extract c

210 [185] d

35 [22.2]

16.7 [12.0]

100 [100]

Osmotic shock

40 [29] d

30 [20]

75 [69]

85 [90.1]

HiTrap chromatography

16 [11.8] e

16 [11.8]

> 95 [> 95]

53 [59]

The value obtained for the purification of TAT-AS is shown in brackets.

a The purity of AS at each step of purification was estimated by SDS–PAGE.

b Ratio of the amount of AS obtained at each step to the total amount of AS estimated in the whole cell extract.

c Supernatant of the cell lysate by sonication.

d Determined by Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

e Determined spectrophotometrically.

The endotoxins (lipopolysaccharides) were completely eliminated from the final protein preparation by treating it with Triton X-114 (see Methods section) as assessed by the E-TOXATE test. The absence of the detergent in the final AS sample was apparent from the absorbance spectrum, which showed a maximum at 276 nm (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Spectral properties of recombinant native AS. In 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride, after eliminating endotoxins. A) UV–vis Absorbance spectrum of AS, 3.2 mg/mL, 15°C. B) Protein fluorescence of AS; 0.1 mg/mL, excitation at 280 nm. C) Far-UV circular dichroism spectrum of AS; 0.1 mg/mL.

The intrinsic fluorescence spectrum of purified recombinant AS showed a maximum emission at 305 nm (Figure 2B), as reported previously [24]. The circular dichroism spectrum of both purified AS forms presented a strong negative peak at 202 nm and a small shoulder at around 222 nm (Figure 2C), indicating a random coil structure possibly with short, marginally stable α-helices; see also [25].

AS is known to be a monomer using nondissociating PAGE [8] but it elutes in size-exclusion chromatography as a symmetric peak at a position corresponding to a larger apparent molecular mass [26]. Gel-permeation chromatography of purified recombinant native AS and TAT-AS gave a main peak at 61.5 ± 5.4 kDa (expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4, Figure 3): the abnormal behavior of AS in size-exclusion chromatography has been ascribed to its natively unfolded conformation in physiological buffer [8]. Indeed, an additional minor peak (≈ 14% of the main peak) corresponding to an apparent molecular mass of 130 ± 8 kDa was also apparent: both peaks gave a single band at 18 kDa in SDS-PAGE analysis (inset of Figure 3). The peak at lower elution volume was previously demonstrated to correspond to a dimer of AS due to disulfide bond formation between cysteines at position 136 under non-reducing conditions [27]. Misincorporation of Cys instead of Tyr at position 136 was reported to happen in AS with a 20-25% frequency: because of the reducing environment of the final cellular destination, dimeric AS should convert into the monomeric form thus not affecting the cell assay.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Gel permeation analysis of recombinant TAT-AS. Peak 1 corresponds to an apparent molecular mass of 130 ± 8 kDa and peak 2 corresponds to an apparent molecular mass of 61.4 ± 5.4 kDa; both peaks gave a single band at 18 kDa in SDS-PAGE analysis (inset). Conditions: HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare) column; 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride as elution buffer.

Atomic force microscopy and functional evaluation of purified AS

AS is natively unfolded and prone to aggregation. To evaluate the fibrillogenic propensity of purified AS, we incubated AS (both native and TAT) for increasing time intervals (2 up to 7 days) at 37°C with sporadic mild agitation. Aliquots of the preparations were then analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Starting from day 2 and up to day 3, we observed AS aggregation with clearly detectable oligomers, while fibrils were formed after longer incubation times. Qualitatively, the TAT-fused AS form seems more fibrillogenic than the native counterpart (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Functional validation of purified AS. A) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of native AS and TAT-AS. AS was incubated as described in Methods to trigger aggregation and fibrillogenesis. At day 3, arrows highlight oligomeric species, while at day 7 they point to longer fibrils. B-C) Cell toxicity assay of purified AS. SHSY-5Y cells were exposed to increasing amounts of AS native (B) or TAT-AS (C) for 24 hours; then cell viability was measured by MTT colorimetric test. Each experimental condition was conducted in quadruplicate. CTRL: control; *p<0.05; **p<0.01, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test.

To functionally assess the purified AS, we performed a toxicity assay on SHSY-5Y cells. Cells were incubated with increasing amounts of AS (both native and TAT) for 24 hours; then viability was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTS) colorimetric assay (Figure 4B-C). We confirmed the toxicity of TAT-AS whereas the native form had no toxic effect in this kind of assay, as previously reported [5]. The basic toxicity of TAT-AS might be a starting point for experiments aimed at unraveling the relation between AS and other kind of cellular stressors, for instance oxidative stress, proteasome impairment or autophagy, all features potentially linked to PD etiopathogenesis [28–31].

Conclusions

Mammalian cells can be manipulated by transfecting expression vectors, microinjection, or diffusion of peptidyl mimetics: these approaches have been rather successful but are not easily regulated and can be laborious. One approach to circumvent these problems is to use HIV Tat-mediated protein transduction as initially described by [32, 33]. We report on the expression and purification of AS, a protein implicated in PD, which exists as a natively unfolded protein in physiological buffer. Here, a new protocol for preparing recombinant native AS and TAT-AS has been developed that involves two steps only: (1) osmotic shock for release of AS-containing periplasm fraction and (2) HiTrap chelating chromatography for further purification of AS. Previous methods used to produce recombinant native AS in E. coli required more steps, comprising at least one ammonium sulphate precipitation and two chromatographic separations [12, 21, 27]. Noteworthy, and differently from previously reported methods [17], TAT-AS was largely produced as soluble protein thus avoiding the need for a resolubilization step. This result is due to a controlled rate of protein synthesis – because of the low IPTG concentration added at the exponential phase of growth – and to the efficient targeting of TAT-AS to the periplasmic space. The latter is not an artifact of massive overproduction or of the experimental method of osmotic shock: AS in the periplasm of E. coli exists stably in (largely) disordered monomeric form [23]. The secondary, tertiary, and (apparent) quaternary structures of both native and TAT-fusion AS forms correspond to those of known protein. Indeed, both recombinant AS proteins form fibrils and TAT-AS only shows cytotoxic effects on SHSY-5Y cells.

This new protocol is a convenient, economical, and rapid procedure for preparing different forms of AS, which favourably compares to methods currently being used. About 12–16 mg AS (native and TAT-fusion protein) with 95% purity can be regularly prepared from a 1-L culture in 1 day. AS is also commercially available (at a cost > 600 $/mg protein) but its variant forms (such as the TAT-AS required for advanced studies) are not.

In conclusion, the recombinant AS forms produced here represent a useful tool for in vitro or in vivo experiments where a tight control of AS concentration and intracellular or extracellular localization is mandatory. Moreover, the capability of native AS and TAT-AS to aggregate and form oligomers or fibrils, though with different toxic effect on our cell model, is of pivotal importance in order to discriminate the real toxic intermediate and the relevance of cellular localization in the dynamics of AS aggregation, toxicity and cell-to-cell propagation, a still debated question in the field of PD pathophysiology.

Methods

Design and cloning of AS cDNAs

Two synthetic cDNAs for AS (one encoding for the native protein and the second containing the additional sequence encoding for the Tat transduction domain, GenBank code KC609369 and KC609370, respectively) were designed by in silico back translation of the amino acid sequence reported in the data bank (GenBank accession number NM_001146055.1, α-syn gene) and optimizing the codon usage for E. coli expression. In detail, all AAG codons (encoding for Lys) were converted into AAA; all CTT, CTC, and TTG codons (encoding for Leu) were converted into CTG; one GGA codon (encoding for Gly) was converted into GGT; and one GTG codon (encoding for Val) was converted into GTT. In order to facilitate the subcloning into pET11a plasmid (carrying the resistance to ampicillin, Novagen), NdeI (CATATG) and BamHI (GGATCC) sites were added at the 5’- and 3’-ends of the cDNA, respectively, and a sequence encoding for six additional histidines was added to the 5’-terminal end of both AS protein forms. The α-syn cDNAs were inserted in the pET11a vector using NdeI and BamHI sites, giving 6.088- and 6.154-kb constructs (pET11-AS and pET11-TAT-AS, respectively).

Strains and growth conditions

For protein expression, both recombinant plasmids were transferred to the E. coli host BL21(DE3) strain: starter cultures were prepared from a single recombinant E. coli clone in LB medium containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL final concentration). Expression trials were conducted using baffled (500 mL) Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of LB, SB or YT medium that was inoculated with the starter culture (initial OD600nm = 0.05); cells were grown at 37°C and shaken (180 rpm) until the protein expression was induced by adding IPTG. Crude extracts were prepared by sonication; see [34] for details. The insoluble fraction of the lysate was removed by centrifugation at 39,000 g for 1 hour at 4°C. Expression level of AS was assessed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis; see below.

For protein purification, periplasmic space content was recovered by adding 50 mL of osmotic shock buffer (30 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.2, 40% saccharose, 2 mM EDTA) to 2.5 g of cell paste (from 1 L of fermentation broth) and incubating for 10 min at room temperature; cells were collected by centrifugation at 17,200 g for 20 min and the pellet was quickly dissolved in 45 mL of cold 1 mM MgCl2. The protein content of the periplasmic space was released and after 3 min at 4°C collected by centrifugation at 17,200 g for 20 min. To the soluble extract 5 mL of 200 mM sodium phosphate was added, pH 7.4, containing 20 μg/mL leupeptin, 7 μg/mL pepstatin, and 1.9 μg/mL PMSF.

Purification of the recombinant AS

Both recombinant AS forms containing an N-terminal His-tag were purified from soluble extracts using Ni2+-affinity chromatography (HiTrap Chelating HP columns, GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 1 M NaCl. The bound protein was eluted with 500 mM imidazole in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4. Imidazole was then removed by overnight dialysis at 4°C against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride.

The amount of purified AS was determined using the extinction coefficient at 280 nm of 5960 M-1 cm-1 for native AS and of 7450 M-1 cm-1 for TAT-AS. The amount and purity degree of the final AS preparations were also estimated by SDS-PAGE and densitometric analysis using the software Quantity One (Biorad). Recombinant AS was analyzed by Western blot using anti-His-tag mouse monoclonal antibodies (His-probe, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and goat anti-mouse IgG HRP-conjugated antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) [34, 35]. Recognition was confirmed by employing a chemiluminescent test (ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System, GE Healthcare), using His-tagged D-amino acid oxidase as positive control [36].

Safety precautions during production and managing of TAT-AS were as detailed in [17].

Endotoxins were removed from the final AS preparation according to the procedure suggested by [37]. Briefly, 1% Triton X-114 was added to the protein sample, which was incubated at 4°C for 30 min and then at 37°C for 10 min, and finally centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min. The aqueous fraction was recovered and the incubation at 37°C, the centrifugation step, and recovery of aqueous fraction were repeated until Triton X-114 was completely eliminated. The removal of endotoxins was assessed by the E-TOXATE test (Sigma-Aldrich).

Biochemical characterization of recombinant AS

UV-Visible absorption spectra were recorded with a Jasco V-560 spectrophotometer (Jasco Co., Cremello Italy). Circular dichroism spectra were recorded on a J-810 Jasco spectropolarimeter and analyzed by means of Jasco software; cell pathlength was 0.1 cm for measurements in the 190- to 250-nm region (0.1 mg protein/mL) [38]. All measurements were carried out at 15°C in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride. Baseline was corrected to account for the buffer content. Circular dichroism spectra were analyzed by K2d software [39].

Size-exclusion chromatography was performed at room temperature on a Superdex 200 or HiLoad Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare) column by means of an Äkta chromatographic system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), using 20 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride, as elution buffer. The column was calibrated with suitable standard proteins.

Atomic force microscopy

AS 130 μM was incubated at 37°C for increasing time intervals (2, 3 and 7 days). Each sample was diluted to 50 μM with 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and incubated for 0.5 min on a freshly cleaved Muscovite mica disk. After the incubation period, the disk was washed with H2O and dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The sample was mounted onto a Multimode AFM with a NanoScope V system operating in Tapping Mode using standard phosphorus-doped silicon probes (T: 3.5–4.5 lm, L: 115–135 lm, W: 30–40 lm, K: 20–80 N/m) (Veeco Instruments, Plainview, NY, USA).

AS cell toxicity assay

SHSY-5Y cells were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 in D-MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Then, 3 x 104 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate and incubated overnight. The next day, the medium was changed and the toxicity of AS was assessed by adding increasing amounts at the μM scale of the purified protein (both native and TAT) for 24 hours. Then, cell viability was measured by a MTT-based assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA).

Abbreviations

AFM: 

Atomic force microscopy

AS: 

α-synuclein

MTT: 

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

TAT-AS: 

chimeric α-synuclein protein fused with the Tat-transduction domain of HIV Tat.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Regione Lombardia Progetto “Nepente” (SAL-09 CUP D11D1100003009) and Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca (University of Insubria) to L. Pollegioni. We thank Serena Rodilossi and Laura Colombo for their technical support, Flavia Marinelli and Gianluca Molla for helpful discussion, and the support from Centro Grandi Attrezzature of University of Insubria.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie e Scienze della Vita, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via J.H. Dunant 3, Varese, Italy
(2)
The Protein Factory, Centro Interuniversitario di Biotecnologie Proteiche, Politecnico di Milano, ICRM – CNR Milano, and Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Mancinelli 7, Milano, Italy
(3)
Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Unità di Genetica delle Malattie Neurodegenerative, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, via La Masa 19, Milano, Italy

References

  1. Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R, Goedert M: α-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature. 1997, 388: 839-840. 10.1038/42166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lee MK, Stirling W, Xu Y, Xu X, Qui D, Mandir AS, Dawson TM, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Price DL: Human alpha-synuclein-harboring familial Parkinson's disease-linked Ala-53→Thr mutation causes neurodegenerative disease with alpha-synuclein aggregation in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 8968-8973. 10.1073/pnas.132197599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Periquet M, Fulga T, Myllykangas L, Schlossmacher MG, Feany MB: Aggregated alpha-synuclein mediates dopaminergic neurotoxicity in vivo. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 3338-3346. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0285-07.2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Quilty MC, King AE, Gai WP, Pountney DL, West AK, Vickers JC, Dickson TC: Alpha-synuclein is upregulated in neurones in response to chronic oxidative stress and is associated with neuroprotection. Exp Neurol. 2006, 199: 249-256. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.10.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Albani D, Peverelli E, Rametta R, Batelli S, Veschini L, Negro A, Forloni G: Protective effect of TAT-delivered α-synuclein: relevance of the C-terminal domain and involvement of HSP70. FASEB J. 2004, 18: 1713-1715.Google Scholar
  6. Jakes R, Spillantini MG, Goedert M: Identification of two distinct synucleins from human brain. FEBS Lett. 1994, 345: 27-32. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00395-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Giasson BI, Uryu K, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM: Mutant and wild type human α-synucleins assemble into elongated filaments with distinct morphologies in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 7619-7622. 10.1074/jbc.274.12.7619.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Weinreb PH, Zhen W, Poon AW, Conway KA, Lansbury PT: NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry. 1996, 35: 13709-13715. 10.1021/bi961799n.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Narhi L, Wood SJ, Steavenson S, Jiang Y, Wu GM, Anafi D, Kaufman SA, Martin F, Sitney K, Denis P, Louis JC, Wypych J, Biere AL, Citron M: Both familial Parkinson’s disease mutations accelerate α-synuclein aggregation. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 9843-9846. 10.1074/jbc.274.14.9843.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Uversky VN, Li J, Fink AL: Evidence for a partially folded intermediate in α-synuclein fibril formation. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 10737-10744. 10.1074/jbc.M010907200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi JY, Sung YM, Park HJ, Hur EH, Lee SJ, Hahn C, Min BR, Kim IK, Kang S, Rhim H: Rapid purification and analysis of α-synuclein proteins: C-terminal truncation promotes the conversion of α-synuclein into a protease-sensitive form in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2002, 36: 33-40. 10.1042/BA20020004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang C, Ren G, Zhou H, Wang CC: A new method for purification of recombinant human α-synuclein in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2005, 42: 173-177. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.02.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fawell S, Seery J, Daikh Y, Moore C, Chen LL, Pepinsky B, Barsoum J: Tat-mediated delivery of heterologous proteins into cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 664-668. 10.1073/pnas.91.2.664.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Barsoum J, Moore C, Seery J, Daikh Y, Chen LL, Corina K, Moy P, Brown R, Shapiro R, Taylor F, Androphy E, Pepinsky B, Fawell S: Tat-mediated delivery of heterologous macromolecules into living cells. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1995, 8: 11-12.Google Scholar
  15. Nagahara H, Vocero-Akbani AM, Snyder EL, Ho A, Latham DG, Lissy NA, Becker-Hapak M, Ezhevsky SA, Dowdy SF: Transduction of full-length TAT fusion proteins into mammalian cells: TAT-p27Kip1 induces cell migration. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 1449-1452. 10.1038/4042.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwarze SR, Dowdy SF: In vivo protein transduction: intracellular delivery of biologically active proteins, compounds and DNA. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000, 21: 45-48. 10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01429-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Becker-Hapak M, McAllister SS, Dowdy SF: TAT-mediated protein transduction into mammalian cells. Methods. 2001, 24: 247-256. 10.1006/meth.2001.1186.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones SW, Christison R, Bundell K, Voyce CJ, Brockbank SM, Newham P, Lindsay MA: Characterisation of cell-penetrating peptide-mediated peptide delivery. Br J Pharmacol. 2005, 145: 1093-1102. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706279.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gustafsson AB, Gottlieb RA, Granville DJ: TAT-mediated protein transduction: delivering biologically active proteins to the heart. Methods Mol Med. 2005, 112: 81-90.Google Scholar
  20. Fittipaldi A, Giacca M: Transcellular protein transduction using the Tat protein of HIV-1. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005, 57: 597-608. 10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kloepper KD, Woods WS, Winter KA, George JM, Rienstra CM: Preparation of alpha-synuclein fibrils for solid-state NMR: expression, purification, and incubation of wild-type and mutant forms. Protein Expr Purif. 2006, 48: 112-117. 10.1016/j.pep.2006.02.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammarström M, Hellgren N, van Den Berg S, Berglund H, Härd T: Rapid screening for improved solubility of small human proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 2002, 11: 313-321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ren G, Wang X, Hao S, Hu H, Wang CC: Translocation of alpha-synuclein expressed in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 2777-2786. 10.1128/JB.01406-06.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Uversky VN, Li J, Fink AL: Metal-triggered structural transformations, aggregation, and fibrillation of human α-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 44284-44296. 10.1074/jbc.M105343200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu HY, Li Q, Cheng HC, Du HN: β-Sheet structure formation of protein in solid state as revealed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. Biopolymers. 2001, 62: 15-21. 10.1002/1097-0282(2001)62:1<15::AID-BIP30>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lashuel HA, Petre BM, Wall J, Simon M, Nowak RJ, Walz T, Lansbury PT: α-Synuclein, especially the Parkinson’s disease-associated mutants, forms pore-like annular and tubular protofibrils. J Mol Biol. 2002, 322: 1089-1102. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00735-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Masuda M, Dohmae N, Nonaka T, Oikawa T, Hisanaga S, Goedert M, Hasegawa M: Cysteine misincorporation in bacterially expressed human alpha-synuclein. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580: 1775-1779. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Xie W, Li X, Li C, Zhu W, Jankovic J, Le W: Proteasome inhibition modeling nigral neuron degeneration in Parkinson's disease. J Neurochem. 2010, 115: 188-199. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06914.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Batelli S, Peverelli E, Rodilossi S, Forloni G, Albani D: Macroautophagy and the proteasome are differently involved in the degradation of alpha-synuclein wild type and mutated A30P in an in vitro inducible model (PC12/TetOn). Neuroscience. 2011, 195: 128-137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sampaio-Marques B, Felgueiras C, Silva A, Rodrigues M, Tenreiro S, Franssens V, Reichert AS, Outeiro TF, Winderickx J, Ludovico P: SNCA (α-synuclein)-induced toxicity in yeast cells is dependent on sirtuin 2 (Sir2)-mediated mitophagy. Autophagy. 2012, 8: 1494-1509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Cristóvão AC, Guhathakurta S, Bok E, Je G, Yoo SD, Choi DH, Kim YS: NADPH oxidase 1 mediates α-synucleinopathy in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. 2012, 32: 14465-14477. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2246-12.2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Green M, Loewenstein PM: Autonomous functional domains of chemically synthesized human immunodeficiency virus tat trans-activator protein. Cell. 1988, 55: 1179-1188. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90262-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Frankel AD, Pabo CO: Cellular uptake of the tat protein from human immunodeficiency virus. Cell. 1988, 55: 1189-1193. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90263-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Volontè F, Pollegioni L, Molla G, Frattini L, Marinelli F, Piubelli L: Production of recombinant cholesterol oxidase containing covalent-bound FAD in Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnol. 2010, 10: 33-10.1186/1472-6750-10-33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Volontè F, Marinelli F, Gastaldo L, Sacchi S, Pilone MS, Pollegioni L, Molla G: Optimization of glutaryl-7-aminocephalosporanic acid acylase expression in E. coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2008, 61: 131-137. 10.1016/j.pep.2008.05.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fantinato S, Pollegioni L, Pilone MS: Engineering, expression and purification of a His-tagged chimeric D-amino acid oxidase from Rhodotorula gracilis. Enz Microb Technol. 2001, 29: 407-412. 10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00400-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu S, Tobias R, McClure S, Styba G, Shi Q, Jackovski G: Removal of endotoxin from recombinant protein preparations. Clin Biochem. 1997, 30: 455-463. 10.1016/S0009-9120(97)00049-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Caldinelli L, Iametti S, Barbiroli A, Bonomi F, Fessas D, Molla G, Pilone MS, Pollegioni L: Dissecting the structural determinants of the stability of cholesterol oxidase containing covalently bound flavin. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 22572-22581. 10.1074/jbc.M500549200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Andrade MA, Chacón P, Merelo JJ, Morán F: Evaluation of secondary structure of proteins from UV circular dichroism spectra using an unsupervised learning neural network. Protein Eng. 1993, 6: 383-390. 10.1093/protein/6.4.383.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Caldinelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us