Skip to main content

Isolation and characterization of novel bacterial strains exhibiting ligninolytic potential



To expand on the range of products which can be obtained from lignocellulosic biomass, the lignin component should be utilized as feedstock for value-added chemicals such as substituted aromatics, instead of being incinerated for heat and energy. Enzymes could provide an effective means for lignin depolymerization into products of interest. In this study, soil bacteria were isolated by enrichment on Kraft lignin and evaluated for their ligninolytic potential as a source of novel enzymes for waste lignin valorization.


Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phenotypic characterization, the organisms were identified as Pandoraea norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp LD002 and Bacillus sp LD003. The ligninolytic capability of each of these isolates was assessed by growth on high-molecular weight and low-molecular weight lignin fractions, utilization of lignin-associated aromatic monomers and degradation of ligninolytic indicator dyes. Pandoraea norimbergensis LD001 and Pseudomonas sp. LD002 exhibited best growth on lignin fractions, but limited dye-decolourizing capacity. Bacillus sp. LD003, however, showed least efficient growth on lignin fractions but extensive dye-decolourizing capacity, with a particular preference for the recalcitrant phenothiazine dye class (Azure B, Methylene Blue and Toluidene Blue O).


Bacillus sp. LD003 was selected as a promising source of novel types of ligninolytic enzymes. Our observations suggested that lignin mineralization and depolymerization are separate events which place additional challenges on the screening of ligninolytic microorganisms for specific ligninolytic enzymes.


Lignin is a complex, three-dimensional aromatic polymer consisting of dimethoxylated, monomethoxylated and non-methoxylated phenylpropanoid subunits [1]. It is found in the secondary cell wall of plants, where it fills the spaces between the cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin components, making the cell wall more rigid and hydrophobic. Lignin provides plants with compressive strength and protection from pathogens [2, 3]. Presently, millions of tons of lignin and lignin-related compounds are produced as waste effluent from the pulping and paper industries [4]. These amounts are expected to further increase in the near future as a result of the recent developments aimed at replacing fossil feedstocks with lignocellulosic biomass for the production of fuels and chemicals. Generally, biorefinery processes only employ the (hemi-) cellulosic part; the lignin component remains as a low-value waste stream [5] that is commonly incinerated to generate heat and power [68]. To date, less than 100 000 t a-1 of lignin obtained from the Kraft pulping process is commercially exploited [9].

Much more value may be obtained if lignin could be utilized as feedstock for value-added chemicals such as substituted aromatics [7, 8]. Such valorization would require controlled depolymerization of lignin, which is hampered by its high resistance towards chemical and biological degradation [1]. Lignin can be depolymerized by thermochemical methods such as pyrolysis (thermolysis), chemical oxidation, hydrogenolysis, gasification, and hydrolysis under supercritical conditions [10]. However, many of these processes are environmentally harsh and occur under severe conditions requiring large amounts of energy [11], therefore these processes are not adequate for efficient lignin valorization.

Enzymes could provide a more specific and effective alternative for lignin depolymerization. Furthermore, biocatalytic processes generally take place under mild conditions, which lowers the energy input and reduces the environmental impact [12, 13]. A complicating factor for biocatalytic lignin degradation, however, are the structural modifications that lignin undergoes during lignocellulose processing [14, 15]. Thus, "industrial" waste lignin may differ considerably from natural lignin, and "natural" ligninolytic enzyme systems may not be the most effective for controlled depolymerization of industrial lignin waste.

The white rot basidiomycetes are the most extensively studied natural lignin degrading microorganisms [16]. These fungi produce an array of powerful ligninolytic enzymes such as laccases, lignin peroxidases (LiP's) and manganese peroxidases (MnP's) [17, 18]. These oxidative enzyme systems commonly require low-molecular weight co-factors and mediators, such as manganese, organic acids, veratryl alcohol and substituted aromatics (e.g. 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, aniline, 4-hydroxybenzioc acid) [12, 19]. These mediators are the actual oxidants responsible for lignin degradation, and can penetrate deeply into the lignocellulosic matrix thanks to their limited size. Fungal lignin depolymerization usually results in a variety of low molecular weight aromatic compounds such as guaiacol, coniferyl alcohol, p-coumarate, ferulate, protocatechuate, p-hydroxybenzoate and vanillate [20, 21].

Ligninolytic bacteria are less well studied, but several examples have been found among α-proteobacteria (e.g., Sphingomonas sp. [2224]), γ-proteobacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas sp. [25],) and actinomycetes (Rhodococcus, Nocardia and Streptomyces sp. [26, 27]). The enzymes reported to be involved in bacterial lignin degradation are laccases, glutathione S-transferases, ring cleaving dioxygenases [23, 28], monooxygenases and phenol oxidases [29]. Such enzymes are also involved in degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which show similar structural properties and resistance to microbial degradation as lignin [28, 30].

Thus, the bacterial ligninolytic potential is still largely unexplored and many novel ligninolytic enzymes may await discovery. These bacterial enzymes may be superior to their fungal counterparts with regard to specificity, thermostability and mediator dependency [2, 21, 31]. They may also have specific advantages for the depolymerization of the modified lignin residues typically encountered in waste streams from the pulping or 2nd generation biofuel/biobased chemicals industry. In the present study, we describe the isolation and identification of three novel ligninolytic bacterial strains, using a model industrial lignin residue from the Kraft process, which at present is the predominant process in the pulping industry.


Enrichment and identification of novel lignin-utilizing bacterial strains

Lignin-degrading microorganisms were enriched in liquid medium with undialysed Kraft lignin (see Methods) as the sole carbon source, using a suspension of soil from beneath rotting logs as the inoculum. After seven successive transfers to fresh lignin medium, individual colonies were obtained on LB agar plates. Seven individual colonies were selected and tentatively identified by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The isolated colonies represented three different species: Pandoraea norimbergensis, Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. (Table 1). In addition, various standard biochemical tests and cellular fatty acids analysis was performed by the German Resource Centre for Biological Material (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany; Additional file 1, Table S1 presents general phenotypic properties of the three isolates and their ability to utilize a selection of substrates.

Table 1 Preliminary identification of isolated strains from enrichment cultures by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Isolate LD001 - Pandoraea norimbergensis

Isolate LD001 was putatively identified as Pandoraea norimbergensis by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Similarities to other members of this genus were lower. The identity of this strain was confirmed by cellular fatty acid profiles (Additional file 2, Table S2) which were typical for the genus Burkholderia and related genera such as Pandoraea. The general strain characteristics are stated in Additional file 1, Table S1. Interestingly, this strain was unable to metabolize a variety of sugars such as glucose, mannose, arabinose, ribose, maltose, trehalose or cellobiose. It was, however, capable of utilizing fructose as well as a variety of organic acids (citrate, malate, gluconate, mesaconate).

Isolate LD002 - Pseudomonassp

The partial 16S rRNA gene sequence of isolate LD002 showed highest similarity to Pseudomonas sp. NZ099 and Pseudomonas jessenii PS06 (Table 1). The cellular fatty acid profile was typical for the genus Pseudomonas (Additional file 2, Table S2). Due to the high similarities between different species in this group, both genetically and physiologically, it was not possible to identify this isolate LD002 to the species level. The general characteristics of isolate LD002, designated as Pseudomonas sp. LD002, are stated in Additional file 1, Table S1.

Isolate LD003 - Bacillussp

The partial 16S rRNA gene sequence of isolate LD003 showed 99% similarity to various members of the Bacillus genus, such as B. cereus and B. thuringiensis. The fatty acids profile (Additional file 2, Table S2) of isolate LD003 was typical for that of the Bacillus cereus group, which includes B. cereus, B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis. Due to the high degree of biochemical and morphological similarity between these species, positive species differentiation is difficult [32]. However, B. anthracis could be excluded since isolate LD003 exhibited motility, hemolysis and growth on penicillin, which is uncharacteristic of B. anthracis [33]. B. thuringiensis has commonly been differentiated from B. cereus through the presence of plasmid-associated genes that encode insecticidal toxins. These are usually visible as parasporal crystals. However, as such plasmids may be lost or transferred horizontally between the two species, B. thuringiensis and B. cereus are basically indistinguishable [34]. Thus, although no parasporal crystals were observed with isolate LD003, no definitive identification as either B. thuringiensis or B. cereus was made, and the isolate was designated Bacillus sp. LD003.

Lignin degrading capacities of the bacterial isolates

The ligninolytic potential of the isolated strains was assessed by their ability to utilize the LMW and HMW fractions of Kraft lignin. The ability to utilize aromatic lignin-monomers as sole carbon source was assessed. In addition, their capacity to decolourize ligninolytic indicator dyes was determined, which is a common method to demonstrate lignin-degrading ability in fungi [35, 36].

Growth on lignin

Mineral salts medium (MM) containing either the HMW or LMW lignin fraction and additional supplements (see Methods) were inoculated with washed cells from overnight cultures of the three bacterial isolates. The inoculum density was kept between 10,000 and 100,000 CFUs/ml and growth was monitored daily by CFU counts (see Methods). If growth was observed, 1% (v/v) of the culture was transferred to fresh medium to verify that growth occurred on the lignin fractions and not as result of carry-over of medium components that may have escaped the washing step.

All the bacterial isolates showed an obvious increase of the number of CFUs in the lignin media (Figure 1). Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and P. norimbergensis LD001 showed most extensive growth, whereas the CFU increase for Bacillus sp. LD003 was relatively modest. Furthermore, Bacillus sp. LD003 required supplementation of CuSO4 and yeast extract for growth on lignin; without these components, no growth at all was observed (not shown). For all three isolates, the observed growth was similar on the LMW and HMW lignin fractions.

Figure 1

Growth of bacterial isolates on lignin. Growth of P. norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003 on a) HMW lignin fraction and b) LMW lignin fraction. Experiments were performed in 4-fold; mean values of CFUs are shown with error bars indicating the maximum deviation from the mean. * Last CFU count for Bacillus sp. LD003 was performed at 96 h instead of 120 h.

Utilization of aromatic monomers

Lignin degrading capacity does not necessarily correlate with efficient growth on lignin, as the released lignin degradation products may not be efficiently metabolized. Particularly actinomycetes have been reported to solubilize and modify lignin, despite exhibiting a limited ability to mineralize lignin [37]. Similarly, the relatively inefficient growth on lignin by Bacillus sp. LD003 may indicate a low capacity to depolymerize lignin, but alternatively a low capacity to utilize lignin degradation products. Therefore, the isolated strains were assessed for the capability to utilize monomeric aromatic compounds that are typically associated with lignin degradation.

The spectrum of lignin monomers that could be utilized for growth was relatively limited for all isolates, although P. norimbergensis LD001 appeared to have a slightly broader substrate range (Table 2). Remarkably, the alcoholic forms of the aromatic monomers (4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, vanillyl alcohol, veratryl alcohol, syringol, guaiacol) were not metabolized by any of the isolates. Also the aromatic aldehydes were utilized to a limited extent: vanillin was not degraded by Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and syringaldehyde was not utilized by Bacillus sp. LD003. In contrast, each isolate consumed all the aromatic acids tested (4-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid and vanillic acid) within 1-2 days. This observation suggests that the isolated strains have a fairly extensive capability for aromatics degradation. However, they appear to lack the alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities required to oxidize the aromatic alcohols and aldehydes to the carboxylic acid form.

Table 2 Growth of bacterial isolates on lignin monomers.

Decolourization of ligninolytic indicator dyes

As indicated above, growth on polymeric lignin or lignin monomers is not necessarily a good measure of the ligninolytic potential of a bacterial isolate. In order to study ligninolytic potential independently from lignin utilization, the decolourization of synthetic lignin-like dyes may be monitored [38]. This approach was followed for the three isolates, employing a range of lignin-mimicking dyes (Additional file 3, Table S3 for dye structures). Dye decolourization was assessed in liquid assays with growing cultures (Figure 2), as well as in solid phase plate assays (see Figure 3 for an example). Cell pellets and colonies were inspected for dye adsorption and cell-free incubations were assayed as control for abiotic dye decolourization.

Figure 2

Decolourization of ligninolytic indicator dyes. Decolourization (% of initial value) of ligninolytic indicator dyes in LB medium, 25 h after dye addition to exponentially growing cultures of P. norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003. Error bars indicate the maximum deviation from the mean of duplicate experiments. * indicates that dye adsorption to the cell pellet was observed after centrifugation. Dyes: Azure B (AB), Methylene blue (MB), Toluidene Blue O (TB), Malachite Green (MG), Congo red (CR), Xylidine ponceau (XP), Indigo Carmine (IC) and Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR).

Figure 3

Decolourization zones in dye-containing plates. Decolourization zones in dye-containing plates after 72 h of incubation. a) LB with 25 mg/L Methylene Blue (MB); b) LB with 25 mg/L Azure B (AB); c) LB with 25 mg/L Toluidine Blue O (TB); d). MM + 20 mM citrate + 0,5 g/L YE with 25 mg/L Methylene Blue; e) MM + 20 mM citrate + 0,5 g/L YE with 25 mg/L Azure B; f) MM + 20 mM citrate + 0,5 g/L YE with 25 mg/L Toluidine Blue O; 1 - P. norimbergensis LD001, 2 - Pseudomonas sp. LD002, 3 - Bacillus sp. LD003. Experiment performed in duplicate.

P. norimbergensis LD001 appeared to decolourize a broad range of dyes in the liquid assays, among which the triarylmethane dye Malachite green (MG) and the indigoid dye Indigo Carmine (IC). However, the abiotic controls of these dyes also showed significant decolourization, indicating that MG and IC were not stable under the conditions tested. Still, P. norimbergensis LD001 was found to decolourize IC as well as MG to a larger extent than the abiotic controls (25%, respectively, 24%), suggesting that at least part of the decolourization was biogenic. Upon inspection of the cell pellets Congo Red (CR), Toluidine Blue (TB), Azure B (AB) and Methylene Blue (MB) were found to adsorb to the cells rather than being degraded. Also in plate assays, the decolourization zones for TB and MB were very small and always accompanied by dye adsorption to the colonies (not shown). In contrast to the liquid assays, no decolourization of AB or CR was observed at all in the plate assays. It was therefore concluded that the actual capacity of P. norimbergensis LD001 to degrade lignin-mimicking dyes was rather limited, and that the decolourization observed should be attributed mostly to dye adsorption.

Pseudomonas sp. LD002 decolourized AB, TB, MB and the azo dye Xylidine Ponceau (XP) by 7-15% in the liquid assays (Figure 2). Of these dyes, only XP was found to adsorb to the cell pellet. Also in the plate assays AB, MB, TB, and XP were decolourized, however, these dyes were also found to adsorb to the colonies (not shown). Therefore, it is unclear to which extent Pseudomonas sp. LD002 was truly capable of degrading these dyes, or to which extent decolourization is affected by the growth conditions. IC was not found to be decolourized more than in the abiotic control, whereas MG was decolourized to 21% over the abiotic control.

Bacillus sp. LD003 decolourized the thiazine dyes Methylene blue (MB), Azure B (AB) and Toluidene Blue O (TB) to 53, 47 and 8% of their initial value within 25 h in the liquid assays (Figure 2). Similarly, distinct decolourization zones were visible on the solid phase assays within 24 h (Figure 3). Also Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) appeared to be decolourized by 15% and Congo red (CR) by 52%. However, in solid phase assays, RBBR and CR appeared to adsorb to the cells rather than being degraded. Like Pseudomonas sp. LD002, Bacillus sp. LD003 did not decolourize IC more than the abiotic control, but MG was decolourized to 18% over the abiotic control. Bacillus sp. LD003 did not grow on plates containing MG (not shown), which can probably be attributed to its antimicrobial properties that are particularly effective against Gram-positive microorganisms [39]. As observed for lignin utilization, addition of YE was necessary for dye decolourization by Bacillus sp. LD003; however, supplementation with CuSO4 could be omitted.

Thus, several lignin-mimicking dyes were decolourized to varying extents by the different bacterial isolates. Especially the dye-decolourizing potential of Bacillus sp. LD003 appeared to be substantial, in contrast to its relatively poor growth on lignin (-monomers). This strain decolourized more dyes, and decolourized the dyes more completely, under various conditions, than the other isolates. In order to assess whether the dye-decolourizing activities were extracellular or rather cell-associated, the dyes were also incubated with culture supernatants of P. norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003. These cultures were performed in the presence of lignin or dye to induce the lignin/dye-degrading enzymes. However, none of the culture supernatants showed any dye-degrading capacity, suggesting that the dye-decolourizing activities were cell-associated (not shown).


Three microbial soil inhabitants identified as Pandoraea norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003 were isolated as potential lignin depolymerizing bacteria. The isolated strains showed growth on both high and low-molecular weight lignin fractions, although growth of Bacillus sp. LD003 was relatively poor. Typical lignin-associated monomers were utilized to a rather limited extent by all three isolates. Remarkably, the isolated strains appeared to lack the ability to oxidize aromatic alcohols or aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acid form.

The ligninolytic potential of the isolates was furthermore assessed by establishing their ability to decolourize synthetic, lignin-like dyes. The recalcitrant thiazine dye Azure B (AB) is particularly suited for this purpose. This dye is decolourized by high redox potential agents, specifically LiP's [17, 40, 41], whereas it cannot be oxidized by nonperoxidase alcohol oxidases, MnP's or laccases alone [40, 42]. In contrast to the other two isolates, Bacillus sp. LD003 readily decolourized AB as well as most of the other lignin-mimicking dyes tested. Also other Bacillus species as well as members of the Streptomyces genus have been reported to degrade AB within 4 - 6 days. These bacteria were isolated from wooden objects, and decolourization of AB was measured to demonstrate lignin peroxidase activity [43]. AB closely resembles methylene blue (MB) and toluidine blue O that were also readily degraded by Bacillus sp. LD003. MB has previously been found to be oxidized by lignin peroxidase [44, 45].

The seemingly contradictory finding that the highest ligninolytic potential appeared to be associated with the strain that showed poorest growth on lignin may be understood from an ecological perspective. Often, recalcitrant compounds such as lignin are degraded by microbial consortia in which the individual strains have specialized roles: some attack the complex substrate whereas others provide essential nutrients [46]. Ligninolytic bacterial consortia can be found, e.g., in the gut of wood-feeding termites[47]. Bacteria like Rhodococcus erythropolis, Burkholderia sp., Citrobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. have been isolated from the guts of wood-feeding termites and beetles. These bacteria typically degrade aromatic compounds [25, 48, 49], which suggests that they feed on the aromatic compounds liberated by the lignin degrading species of the gut microflora. However, lignin-degrading activity has also been reported for certain aromatic compound degraders such as Pseudomonas sp. and Burkholderia sp. Furthermore, genera such as Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Bacillus and Pandoraea have been reported to degrade the structurally crucial biphenyl component of lignin, which composes up to 10% of the structure, depending on the lignin type [27, 50, 51].

Like in other lignin preparations, trace amounts of (hemi)-cellulose may be present in Kraft lignin. This however, is not likely to account for the observed growth on lignin, although the cellulolytic capacity of the isolated strains has not been investigated in detail. Many if not most soil bacteria have incomplete cellulolytic systems [52]. Especially Pandoraea norimbergensis is unlikely to utilize cellulose, since it was unable to utilize glucose or cellobiose, both comprising cellulose [53]. Indeed, several Bacillus sp. are able to utilize cellulose [54]. The limited growth observed however, on both the high and low molecular weight lignin fractions, in combination with the ability to utilize certain lignin-model dyes clearly indicate the ligninolytic potential of this strain. Other Bacillus sp. have accordingly been reported to degrade Kraft lignin [5557]. In addition, several Pseudomonas sp. are able to degrade various lignin preparations such as milled wood lignin, dioxane lignin and lignin from poplar wood [58], further supporting our findings.

In a ligninolytic consortium, Bacillus sp. LD003 may fulfill the role of lignin degrader that has to rely on other microbes for specific nutrients, as suggested by its requirement for yeast extract. The other isolates in this study, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and P. norimbergensis LD001, showed lesser ligninolytic capacities, but utilized a somewhat wider range of aromatics and did not depend on additional nutrients. Thus, such strains may fulfill the role of nutrient-provider.

The bacterial isolates in this study appear to have an alternative type of ligninolytic system. The enzymes are presumably cell-surface associated, in view of the large size of lignin, whereas fungal lignin degradation occurs via extracellular enzymes and secreted secondary metabolites [5962]. Thus, a new and presumably vast source may be tapped for novel ligninolytic enzyme activities. A few considerations, however, must be taken into account when hunting for novel ligninolytic activities for lignin valorization. First, the type of lignin to be valorized is a key factor, since the process by which it is obtained will result in structural modifications [15, 63, 64]. Thus, "natural" ligninolytic systems like those associated with white-rot fungi may not be the most efficient to valorize "industrial" lignin streams such as the Kraft lignin employed in this study. Furthermore, the most efficient lignin mineralizing strains may not be the most efficient lignin depolymerizers. Therefore, lignin degradation should be monitored as directly as possible. Ideally, the actual substrate should be used in degradation assays, but the heterogeneous nature of lignin severely complicates the analytics. Alternatively, synthetic dyes may be used to mimic lignin as we did in the present study. However, the ligninolytic activities obtained by this approach should be evaluated for their utility on the proper type of lignin.


Microorganisms capable of growing on the complex lignin substrate may be a source of novel enzymes which can be of use for the valorization of waste lignin. Three soil isolates, namely Pandoraea norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003 were identified as potential lignin depolymerizing bacteria, confirming that ligninolytic microorganisms can be found outside the fungal kingdom. All three strains demonstrated growth on both high molecular weight and low-molecular weight lignin fractions, although growth was generally slow and rather poor. The ability to utilize lignin monomers was also relatively limited for all three isolates. The best lignin-like dye decolourizing capacity was observed for the Bacillus sp. LD003 and the ligninolytic enzymes and their potential for biocatalytic Kraft lignin depolymerization, are currently under investigation.


Lignin preparation

Commercially available Kraft lignin (Sigma) was used throughout this study. According to the suppliers' specifications, the lignin was water-soluble, contained 4% sulfur impurities, and had an average Mw of 10.000 Da. Sterile stock solutions of 50 g/L in 15 mM potassium phosphate (KPi) buffer (pH 7.6) were prepared by autoclaving.

HPLC analysis of diluted lignin solution (0.5 g/L) showed that low-molecular weight (LMW) aromatic compounds were present (not shown). In order to remove the LMW compounds, a 50-ml aliquot of the lignin stock solution was dialyzed overnight against 500 ml of KPi buffer at 2°C using benzoylated dialysis tubing with a 2000-Da MW cut-off (Sigma-Aldrich). The dialysis buffer contained approximately 90% of the LMW lignin fraction, and was stored at -20°C for further testing. Three additional buffer changes (5 L/change) were performed over a 96-h period until no further release of LMW compounds was observed (Additional file 4, Figure S1). The retentate containing the HMW lignin fraction was stored at 2°C until further use.

Isolation and identification of lignin degrading bacteria

A phosphate buffered mineral salts medium, pH 7, (MM) [65] supplemented with 5 g/L of non-dialysed Kraft lignin, 0.5 mg/L copper sulfate and 0.1 g/L yeast extract (MML), was used for enrichment of lignin-degrading bacteria. As inoculum material, soil collected from beneath decomposing wood logs in a forest near Austerlitz (The Netherlands) was used. The inoculum was prepared by suspending 5 g of soil in 100 ml of sterile 0.9% (w/v) NaCl. After incubating for 1 h at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm, 5-ml aliquots were used to inoculate four 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml of MML. The cultures were grown at 30°C in a shaking incubator and after 48 h, 1-ml aliquots were transferred to fresh MML. Over a period of 24 d, seven successive transfers were performed after which the cultures were streaked onto Luria Broth (LB) agar to obtain pure cultures.

Total DNA was isolated from the pure cultures using a Fast-DNA kit (Q-Biogene). Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers FD1/2: AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG and RP1/2: ACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT [66] using Pfu DNA polymerase (Fermentas). The resulting PCR products were sequenced by MWG Biotech AG and a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis was performed on these sequences to determine the identity of the bacterial isolates [67]. The isolates were further characterized at the German Resource Centre for Biological Material (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany), including cellular fatty acid analysis, API, BIOLOG and classical physiological tests. The isolates, Pandoraea norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003 were deposited at the German Resource Centre for Biological Material (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) under the following numbers: [DSMZ: DSM 24563], [DSMZ: DSM 24571] and [DSMZ: DSM 24559], respectively.

Cultivation of lignin degrading bacteria

The bacteria isolated from the enrichment cultures (Pandoraea norimbergensis LD001, Pseudomonas sp. LD002 and Bacillus sp. LD003) were routinely cultured on Luria broth (LB; 5 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, pH 7). Alternatively, the strains were cultured on mineral salts medium, i.e., MM supplemented with 40 mM of glycerol, 20 mM of glucose, or 20 mM of citrate.

For monitoring growth on lignin, MM was supplemented with either the LMW or HMW lignin preparations, to a final concentration of 5 g/L. For Bacillus sp. LD003, MM was furthermore supplemented with yeast extract (0.1 g/L) and CuSO4 (0.5 mg/L). The strains were precultured overnight on mineral salts medium and centrifuged. The cell pellet was washed (in 0.9% NaCl), resuspended, and used to inoculate amber Boston bottles (250 ml) containing 10 ml of lignin medium. The cultures were incubated at 30°C, with shaking, and samples were drawn at regular intervals to monitor growth.

The lignin concentrations employed prevented accurate optical density measurements. Therefore, growth was monitored by colony-forming unit (CFU) counts. For CFU-counts, the cultures were serially diluted in 0.9% (w/v) NaCl and plated on LB agar plates. Daily CFU determinations were made until no further CFU increase occurred. Subsequently, cultures were transferred to fresh media, followed by daily CFU determinations over a period of 5 d (120 h) to exclude that growth was due to the presence of residual carbon from the precultures.

Dye decolourization assays

Decolourization of lignin-mimicking dyes was assessed both in liquid and in solid-phase assays. The following dyes were selected: Azure B (AB), Indigo Carmine (IC), Malachite Green (MG), Congo Red (CR), Xylidine ponceau (XP), Methylene Blue (MB), Toluidene Blue O (TB) and Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) (Additional file 3, Table S3). For liquid assays, the individual strains were grown in LB to an OD600 of approximately 0.7 - 0.9 (mid-exponential growth). Dyes were added to 25 mg/L (RBBR: 50 mg/L) and cultivation was continued for another 48 h in 250-ml amber Boston bottles at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Cultures without inoculum were included as controls for spontaneous dye decolourization. Samples were drawn at various time intervals and centrifuged for 2.5 min at 15,000 × g. The decolourization of a specific dye was calculated as a percentage of the initial absorbance at λmax [46]. The colour of the pellet was also visually inspected to establish whether the dye had adsorbed to the cells rather than being degraded.

For solid phase dye decolourization assays, bacteria were streaked onto dye-containing agar plates with various media. Either LB or mineral salts medium (MM) was used, supplemented with a carbon source (glycerol (40 mM) or citrate (20 mM)) and YE (0.5 g/L). Dyes were added to 50 mg/L (IC, MG, CR, XP and RBBR) or 25 mg/L (AB, MB and TB). The plates were monitored daily over a period of 120 h for growth and the development of decolourization zones.

Analytical methods

For spectrophotometric analysis of the various dyes, a μQuant MQX200 universal microplate spectrophotometer (Bio-tek) was used. The absorbance spectra of the dyes between 200 nm to 800 nm were measured to establish λmax for each dye (AB, 650 nm; MB, 665 nm; TB, 635 nm; IC, 615 nm; XP, 505 nm; MG, 615 nm; CR, 470 nm; RBBR, 595 nm). Cell density was measured at 600 nm (OD600) using flat-bottom 96-well microplates (Greiner). Cell dry weight (CDW) was calculated from the OD600 value. It was established that an OD600 of 1 corresponded to 0.42 g/L CDW for the Bacillus sp. LB003 and P. norimbergensis LB001, respectively, 0.39 g/L CDW for Pseudomonas sp LB002. Aromatic compounds were analyzed on an Agilent 1100 HPLC system equipped with a diode array detector set at 254 nm and a 3.5 μM Zorbax SB-C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm). 20 mM KH2PO4 (pH 2) was used as the eluent at a flow of 1.5 ml/min, with a 0 - 20% acetonitrile gradient developing between 0 - 6 min, followed by 20% acetonitrile for a further minute, after which the gradient was decreased to 0% within the final minute.


All dyes, aromatic compounds and lignin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.


  1. 1.

    Martinez AT, Speranza M, Ruiz-Duenas FJ, Ferreira P, Camarero S, Guillen F, Martinez MJ, Gutierrez A, del Rio JC: Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int Microbiol. 2005, 8 (3): 195-204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV: Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology. 2008, 35 (5): 377-391. 10.1007/s10295-008-0327-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rubin EM: Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature. 2008, 454 (7206): 841-845. 10.1038/nature07190.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    De los Santos Ramos W, Poznyak T, Chairez I, Cordova RI: Remediation of lignin and its derivatives from pulp and paper industry wastewater by the combination of chemical precipitation and ozonation. Journal of hazardous materials. 2009, 169 (1-3): 428-434. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.152.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Stewart D: Lignin as a base material for materials applications: Chemistry, application and economics. Ind Crops Prod. 2008, 27: 202-207. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.07.008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD: Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science (New York, NY. 2007, 315 (5813): 804-807. 10.1126/science.1137016.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T: The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science (New York, NY. 2006, 311 (5760): 484-489. 10.1126/science.1114736.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zaldivar J, Nielsen J, Olsson L: Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2001, 56 (1-2): 17-34. 10.1007/s002530100624.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gosselink RJA, de Jong E, Guran B, Abächerli A: Co-ordination network for lignin--standardisation, production and applications adapted to market requirements (EUROLIGNIN). Ind Crops Prod. 2004, 20: 121-129. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.015.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pandey MP, Kim CS: Lignin Depolymerization and Conversion: A Review of Thermochemical Methods. Chem Engin Technol. 2011, 34 (1): 29-41. 10.1002/ceat.201000270.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ward PO, Singh A: Bioethanol technology: developments and perspectives. Advan Appl Microbiol. 2002, 51: 53-80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Perez J, Munoz-Dorado J, de la Rubia T, Martinez J: Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol. 2002, 5 (2): 53-63. 10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sun Y, Cheng J: Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource technology. 2002, 83 (1): 1-11. 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Emmel A, Mathias AL, Wypych F, Ramos LP: Fractionation of Eucalyptus grandis chips by dilute acid-catalysed steam explosion. Bioresource technology. 2003, 86 (2): 105-115. 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00165-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Crawford RL: Lignin Biodegradation and Transformation.: Wiley-Interscience; 1981.

  16. 16.

    Ahmad M, Taylor CR, Pink D, Burton K, Eastwood D, Bending GD, Bugg TD: Development of novel assays for lignin degradation: comparative analysis of bacterial and fungal lignin degraders. Molecular bioSystems. 6 (5): 815-821.

  17. 17.

    Arantes V, Ferreira Milagres AM: The synergistic action of ligninolytic enzymes (MnP and Laccase) and Fe3+-reducing activity from white-rot fungi for degradation of Azure B. Enzyme and microbial technology. 2007, 42: 17-22. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.07.017.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shary S, Kapich AN, Panisko EA, Magnuson JK, Cullen D, Hammel KE: Differential expression in Phanerochaete chrysosporium of membrane-associated proteins relevant to lignin degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (23): 7252-7257. 10.1128/AEM.01997-08.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kunamneni A, Camarero S, Garcia-Burgos C, Plou FJ, Ballesteros A, Alcalde M: Engineering and Applications of fungal laccases for organic synthesis. Microbial cell factories. 2008, 7: 32-10.1186/1475-2859-7-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Harwood CS, Parales RE: The beta-ketoadipate pathway and the biology of self-identity. Annual review of microbiology. 1996, 50: 553-590. 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.553.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Masai E, Katayama Y, Fukuda M: Genetic and biochemical investigations on bacterial catabolic pathways for lignin-derived aromatic compounds. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry. 2007, 71 (1): 1-15. 10.1271/bbb.60437.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wenzel M, Schonig I, Berchtold M, Kampfer P, Konig H: Aerobic and facultatively anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis. Journal of applied microbiology. 2002, 92 (1): 32-40. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01502.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Masai E, Ichimura A, Sato Y, Miyauchi K, Katayama Y, Fukuda M: Roles of the enantioselective glutathione S-transferases in cleavage of beta-aryl ether. Journal of bacteriology. 2003, 185 (6): 1768-1775. 10.1128/JB.185.6.1768-1775.2003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Masai E, Katayama Y, Nishikawa S, Fukuda M: Characterization of Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 genes involved in degradation of lignin-related compounds. Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology. 1999, 23 (4-5): 364-373. 10.1038/sj.jim.2900747.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Delalibera I, Vasanthakumar A, Burwitz BJ, Schloss PD, Klepzig KD, Handelsman J, Raffa KF: Composition of the bacterial community in the gut of the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera) colonizing red pine. Symbiosis. 2007, 43: 97-104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zimmermann W: Degradation of lignin by bacteria. Journal of biotechnology. 1990, 13: 119-130. 10.1016/0168-1656(90)90098-V.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bugg TD, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Singh R: The emerging role for bacteria in lignin degradation and bio-product formation. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2010, 22: 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Allocati N, Federici L, Masulli M, Di Ilio C: Glutathione transferases in bacteria. The FEBS journal. 2009, 276 (1): 58-75. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06743.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Perestelo F, Falcon MA, Perez ML, Roig EC, de la Fuente Martin G: Bioalteration of Kraft Pine Lignin by Bacillus rnegaterium Isolated from Compost Piles. J Fermen Bioeng. 1989, 68 (2): 151-153. 10.1016/0922-338X(89)90066-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Canas AI, Alcalde M, Plou F, Martinez MJ, Martinez AT, Camarero S: Transformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by laccase is strongly enhanced by phenolic compounds present in soil. Environmental science & technology. 2007, 41 (8): 2964-2971. 10.1021/es062328j.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ruijssenaars HJ, Hartmans S: A cloned Bacillus halodurans multicopper oxidase exhibiting alkaline laccase activity. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2004, 65 (2): 177-182.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhong W, Shou Y, Yoshida TM, Marrone BL: Differentiation of Bacillus anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73 (10): 3446-3449. 10.1128/AEM.02478-06.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Henderson I, Duggleby CJ, Turnbull PC: Differentiation of Bacillus anthracis from other Bacillus cereus group bacteria with the PCR. International journal of systematic bacteriology. 1994, 44 (1): 99-105. 10.1099/00207713-44-1-99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Helgason E, Okstad OA, Caugant DA, Johansen HA, Fouet A, Mock M, Hegna I, Kolsto AB: Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis--one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66 (6): 2627-2630. 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2627-2630.2000.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kiiskinen LL, Ratto M, Kruus K: Screening for novel laccase-producing microbes. Journal of applied microbiology. 2004, 97 (3): 640-646. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02348.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Field JA, de Jong E, Feijoo-Costa G, de Bont JM: Screening for ligninolytic fungi applicable to the biodegradation of xenobiotics. Trends in biotechnology. 1993, 11: 44-49. 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90121-O.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vikman M, Karjomaa S, Kapanen A, Wallenius K, Itavaara M: The influence of lignin content and temperature on the biodegradation of lignocellulose in composting conditions. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2002, 59 (4-5): 591-598. 10.1007/s00253-002-1029-1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Husain Q: Potential applications of the oxidoreductive enzymes in the decolorization and detoxification of textile and other synthetic dyes from polluted water: a review. Critical reviews in biotechnology. 2006, 26 (4): 201-221. 10.1080/07388550600969936.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    van Schothorst M, Renaud AM: Malachite green pre-enrichment medium for improved salmonella isolation from heavily contaminated samples. The Journal of applied bacteriology. 1985, 59 (3): 223-230. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb01783.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Archibald FS: A new assay for lignin-type peroxidases employing the dye azure B. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992, 58 (9): 3110-3116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Aguiar A, Ferraz A: Fe(3+)- and Cu(2+)-reduction by phenol derivatives associated with Azure B degradation in Fenton-like reactions. Chemosphere. 2007, 66 (5): 947-954. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.067.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Arora DS, Gill PK: Comparison of two assay procedures for lignin peroxidase. Enzyme and microbial technology. 2001, 28 (7-8): 602-605. 10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00302-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Pangallo D, Chovanova K, Simonovicova A, Ferianc P: Investigation of microbial community isolated from indoor artworks and air environment: identification, biodegradative abilities, and DNA typing. Canadian journal of microbiology. 2009, 55 (3): 277-287. 10.1139/w08-136.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Demidova TN, Hamblin MR: Photodynamic inactivation of Bacillus spores, mediated by phenothiazinium dyes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71 (11): 6918-6925. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6918-6925.2005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ferreira-Leitao VS, Godinho da Silva J, Bon EPS: Methylene blue and azure B oxidation by horseradish peroxidase:a comparative evaluation of class II and class III peroxidases. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2003, 42: 213-221. 10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00238-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Kalyani DC, Chang JS, Govindwar SP: Enhanced decolorization and biodegradation of textile azo dye Scarlet R by using developed microbial consortium-GR. Bioresource technology. 2009, 100 (9): 2493-2500. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Geib SM, Filley TR, Hatcher PG, Hoover K, Carlson JE, Jimenez-Gasco Mdel M, Nakagawa-Izumi A, Sleighter RL, Tien M: Lignin degradation in wood-feeding insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008, 105 (35): 12932-12937. 10.1073/pnas.0805257105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Chung SY, Maeda M, Song E, Horikoshi K, Kudo T: A Gram-positive Polychlorinated Biphenyl-degrading Bacterium, Rhodococcus erythropolis Strain TA421, Isolated from a Termite Ecosystem. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry. 1994, 58: 2111-2113. 10.1271/bbb.58.2111.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Harazono K, Yamashita N, Shinzato N, Watanabe Y, Fukatsu T, Kurane R: Isolation and Characterization of Aromatics-degrading Microorganisms from the Gut of the Lower Termite Coptotermes formosanus. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry. 2003, 67 (4): 889-892. 10.1271/bbb.67.889.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gomez-Gil L, Kumar P, Barriault D, Bolin JT, Sylvestre M, Eltis LD: Characterization of biphenyl dioxygenase of Pandoraea pnomenusa B-356 as a potent polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading enzyme. Journal of bacteriology. 2007, 189 (15): 5705-5715. 10.1128/JB.01476-06.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pieper DH: Aerobic degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2005, 67 (2): 170-191. 10.1007/s00253-004-1810-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rabinovich ML, Melnik MS, Bolobova AV: Microbial cellulases. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2002, 38: 305-321. 10.1023/A:1016264219885.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Beguin P, Aubert JP: The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS microbiology reviews. 1994, 13 (1): 25-58. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00033.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS: Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002, 66 (3): 506-577. 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002. table of contents.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Chandra R, Raj A, Purohit HJ, Kapley A: Characterisation and optimisation of three potential aerobic bacterial strains for kraft lignin degradation from pulp paper waste. Chemosphere. 2007, 67 (4): 839-846. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.011.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Raj A, Reddy MM, Chandra R, Purohit HJ, Kapley A: Biodegradation of kraft-lignin by Bacillus sp. isolated from sludge of pulp and paper mill. Biodegradation. 2007, 18 (6): 783-792. 10.1007/s10532-007-9107-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Raj A, Reddy MMK, Chandra R: Identification of low molecular weight aromatic compounds by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) from kraft lignin degradation by three Bacillus sp. Int Biodeter Biodeg. 2007, 59: 292-296. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.09.006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Odier E, Janin G, Monties B: Poplar Lignin Decomposition by Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981, 41 (2): 337-341.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Eriksson KE, Blanchette RA, Ander P: Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Wood and Wood Components. 1990, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Hammel KE, Cullen D: Role of fungal peroxidases in biological ligninolysis. Current opinion in plant biology. 2008, 11 (3): 349-355. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.02.003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hammel KE, Kapich AN, Jensen KA, Ryan ZC: Reactive oxygen species as agents of wood decay by fungi. Enzyme and microbial technology. 2002, 30: 445-453. 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00011-X.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kersten P, Cullen D: Extracellular oxidative systems of the lignin-degrading Basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007, 44 (2): 77-87. 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.07.007.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Biermann CJ: Essentials of pulping and papermaking. 1993, New york: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Gierer J: The Reactions of Lignin during Pulping. A Description and Comparison of Conventional Pulping Processes. Sven Papperstidn. 1970, 73: 571-596.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hartmans S, Smits JP, van der Werf MJ, Volkering F, de Bont JA: Metabolism of Styrene Oxide and 2-Phenylethanol in the Styrene-Degrading Xanthobacter Strain 124X. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989, 55 (11): 2850-2855.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Weisberg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ: 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. Journal of bacteriology. 1991, 173 (2): 697-703.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of molecular biology. 1990, 215 (3): 403-410.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Coenye T, Falsen E, Hoste B, Ohlen M, Goris J, Govan JR, Gillis M, Vandamme P: Description of Pandoraea gen. nov. with Pandoraea apista sp. nov., Pandoraea pulmonicola sp. nov., Pandoraea pnomenusa sp. nov., Pandoraea sputorum sp. nov. and Pandoraea norimbergensis comb. nov. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology. 2000, 50 (Pt 2): 887-899.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Godfrey SA, Harrow SA, Marshall JW, Klena JD: Characterization by 16S rRNA sequence analysis of pseudomonads causing blotch disease of cultivated Agaricus bisporus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67 (9): 4316-4323. 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4316-4323.2001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Valverde A, Burgos A, Fiscella T, Rivas R, Vela' zquez E, Rodrı' guez-Barrueco C, Cervantes E, Chamber M, Igual J: Differential effects of coinoculations with Pseudomonas jessenii PS06 (a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium) and Mesorhizobium ciceri C-2/2 strains on the growth and seed yield of chickpea under greenhouse and field conditions. Plant and soil. 2006, 287: 43-50. 10.1007/s11104-006-9057-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Banerjee A, Ghoshal AK: Isolation and characterization of hyper phenol tolerant Bacillus sp. from oil refinery and exploration sites. Journal of hazardous materials. 2010, 176 (1-3): 85-91. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Prakash NT, Sharma N, Prakash R, Acharya R: Removal of selenium from Se enriched natural soils by a consortium of Bacillus isolates. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2010, 85 (2): 214-218. 10.1007/s00128-010-0061-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Nishiwaki H, Ito K, Shimomura M, Nakashima K, Matsuda K: Insecticidal bacteria isolated from predatory larvae of the antlion species Myrmeleon bore (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Journal of invertebrate pathology. 2007, 96 (1): 80-88. 10.1016/j.jip.2007.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project is financially supported by the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs and the B-Basic partner organizations ( through B-Basic, a public-private NWO-ACTS programme (ACTS = Advanced Chemical Technologies for Sustainability). This project was carried out within the research programme of the Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation which is part of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. We would like to thank Rita Volkers for her advice and practical assistance.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes H de Winde.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LB participated in the experimental design, performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. NW participated in the experiments. HJR and JHdW conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft and approve the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Table S1. General characteristics of isolated strains. Table S1 presents general phenotypic properties of the three isolates and their ability to utilize a selection of substrates. (PDF 20 KB)

Additional file 2: Table S2. Fatty acid composition of strains studied. The identity of the three strains were confirmed by the cellular fatty acid profiles indicated in Table S2. (PDF 6 KB)

Additional file 3: Table S3. Dyes used in this study. The dye structures are represented in Table S3. (PDF 717 KB)

Additional file 4: Figure S1. Analysis of LMW and HMW lignin fractions. a) HPLC analysis of the LMW lignin fraction. Vanillin is indicated as a representative for the aromatic lignin monomers. Other peaks were not identified, but the absorption spectra spectra (not shown) suggested an aromatic structure; b) HPLC analysis of the high molecular weight lignin (HMW) fraction (diluted 10 times prior to HPLC measurement). Less LMW aromatic peaks were observed and vanillin was absent; c) Absorbance spectra of the dialysis buffer between 200 - 400 nm (absorption range for aromatic compounds). The absorption decreased with consecutive buffer changes, indicating that no further LMW aromatic compound were released from the HMW fraction. (PDF 354 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bandounas, L., Wierckx, N.J., de Winde, J.H. et al. Isolation and characterization of novel bacterial strains exhibiting ligninolytic potential. BMC Biotechnol 11, 94 (2011).

Download citation


  • Lignin
  • Methylene Blue
  • Malachite Green
  • Mineral Salt Medium
  • Luria Broth