Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Saccharification and hydrolytic enzyme production of alkali pre-treated wheat bran by Trichoderma virens under solid state fermentation

  • 1Email author,
  • 2Email author,
  • 1, 3,
  • 4,
  • 2 and
  • 2
BMC Biotechnology201515:37

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0158-4

©  El-Shishtawy et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

  • Received: 25 November 2014
  • Accepted: 1 May 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

In continuation of our previously interest in the saccharification of agriculture wastes by Bacillus megatherium in solid state fermentation (SSF), we wish to report an investigation and comparative evaluation among Trichoderma sp. for the saccharification of four alkali-pretreated agricultural residues and production of hydrolytic enzymes, carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase), filter paperase (FPase), pectinase (PGase) and xylanase (Xylase) in SSF. The optimization of the physiological conditions of production of hydrolytic enzymes and saccharification content from Trichoderma virens using alkali-pretreated wheat bran was the last goal.

Methods

The physico-chemical parameters of SSF include incubation time, incubation temperature, moisture content of the substrate, incubation pH, supplementation with carbon and nitrogen sources were optimized.

Results

Saccharification of different solid state fermentation sources wheat bran, date's seeds, grass and palm leaves, were tested for the production of fermentable sugar by Trichoderma sp. The maximum production of hydrolytic enzymes CMCase, FPase, PGase and Xylase and saccharification content were obtained on wheat bran. Time course, moisture content, optimum temperature, optimum pH, supplementation with carbon and nitrogen sources were optimized to achieve the maximum production of the hydrolytic enzymes, protein and total carbohydrate of T. virens using alkali pre-treated wheat bran. The maximum production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase, protein and carbohydrate content was recorded at 72 h of incubation, 50-70 % moisture, temperature 25-35 °C and pH 5. The influence of supplementary carbon and nitrogen sources was studied. While lactose and sucrose enhanced the activity of PGase from 79.2 to 582.9 and 632.6 U/g, starch inhibited all other enzymes. This was confirmed by maximum saccharification content. Among the nitrogen sources, yeast extract and urea enhanced the saccharification content and CMCase, PGase and Xylase.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that alkali pre-treated wheat bran was a better substrate for saccharification and production of hydrolytic enzymes CMCase, FPase, PGase and xylase by T. virens compared to other alkali-pretreated agricultural residues tested.

Keywords

  • Trichoderma sp
  • Saccharification
  • Hydrolytic enzymes
  • Agriculture wastes

Background

Agricultural residues, forests and agro industrial practices generally accumulated in the environment and caused pollution problem. Active efforts were being made to convert these organic waste resources into either glucose or alcohol, and use this either as fuel or as a valuable starting material for chemical synthesis [1]. Saccharification of polysaccharides to glucose by microbial hydrolytic enzymes which had attracted the attention of the researchers, as this was the first step of bioconversion of organic material into valuable products such as sugar, fine chemicals and biofuels [2]. As the cost of cellulosic substrates play the central role in determining the economy of the saccharification process, lot of emphasis had been given to the usage of low price substrates and therefore screening of the agricultural wastes for release of sugars as organic wastes from renewable forest and agricultural residues [3]. The saccharification of different agro-wastes had been reported by other workers employing enzymes from different organisms [4–6].

Recently, a significant interest raised in using solid state fermentation (SSF) instead of submerged fermentation (SmF). The advantages of SSF in comparison to traditional SmF were better yields, easier recovery of products, the absence of foam formation and smaller reactor volumes. Moreover, contamination risks were significantly reduced due to the low water contents and, consequently, the volume of effluents decreases [7]. Another very important advantage was that, it permits the use of agricultural and agro-industrial residues as substrates which were converted into products with high commercial value like secondary metabolites, organic acids, pesticides, aromatic compounds, fuels and enzymes [8]. Furthermore, the utilization of these compounds helps in solving pollution, which otherwise caused their disposal [9]. For enzyme production, the costs of these techniques were lower and the production higher than submerged cultures [10,11].

Structural properties of cellulose such as the degree of crystallinity, the degree of polymerization and the surface area, limit accessibility of substrate to enzyme and had been demonstrated [12] to affect the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Pretreatment methods, which disrupted the highly-ordered cellulose structure and the lignin-carbohydrate complex, remove lignin, and increase the surface area accessible to enzymes, promoted the hydrolysis, and increased the rate and extent of hydrolysis of cellulose in various lignocellulosic residues. The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials correlated with the level of cellulose crystallinity [13] complete enzymatic hydrolysis of the polysaccharides of lignocelluloses required a concerted action of a complex array of hydrolases including cellulase, xylanase, pectinase, and other side-group cleavage enzymes [14].

Several cell-decomposing microorganisms produce cellulases which were the most economic and available sources for fermentable sugar production, because these microorganisms could grow on inexpensive media. The genus Trichoderma, filamentous ascomycetes were widely used in industrial applications because of high secretary capacity and inducible promoting characteristics [15]. The structural complexity were often easily degraded by xylanases, mannanases etc. which were present in some cellulase preparations, so that their presence may actually lead to increased production of reducing sugars and greater susceptibility of the residual cellulose [16–18].

In continuation of our interest in the saccharification of agriculture wastes by SSF [19], we wished to report an investigation and comparative evaluation among Trichoderma sp., T. reesei, T. viride, T. harzianum and T. virens for the saccharification of four alkali-pretreated agricultural residues, wheat bran, date’s seeds, wild grass and palm’s leaves under solid state fermentation for the production of hydrolytic enzymes, carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase), filter paperase (FPase), pectinase (PGase) and xylanase (Xylase). The polysaccharide composition of these agricultural residues included different concentrations from cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin [20–22]. The optimization of the physiological conditions of production of hydrolytic enzymes and saccharification content from T. virens using alkali-pretreated wheat bran was the last goal.

Methods

Microorganisms

T. reesei, T. viride, T. harzianum and T. virens were obtained from National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt and maintained on potato dextrose agar. The slants were grown at 28 °C for seven days and stored at 4 °C.

Pretreatment of agricultural wastes

Wheat bran, date's seeds, grass and palm leaves were chosen as the sole nutrient source for solid-state fermentation (SSF). They dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. The dried substrates were then milled in a commercial mill and sieved. The mean diameter of the dried substrates was 1.0 mm. The substrates were pretreated with 1.0 M NaOH at 121 °C and 15 psi pressure for 1 hr at the ratio of 1:10 (w/v) [23,24]. The pretreated materials were washed with tap water until the pH of the filtrate reached 7.0. The washed materials were dried at 60 °C overnight to constant weight and stored at room temperature for further use.

Inoculum medium

The medium used for inoculum of Trichoderma sp. preparation contained (g l−1): KH2PO4, 28; (NH4)2SO4, 19.6; Urea, 4.2; MgSO4. 7H20, 4.2; CoCl2, 4.2; FeSO4. 7H20, 0.07; MnSO4. 7H20, 0.021; ZnSO4 7H20, 0.019; CaC12, 0.028; yeast extract, 7; and glucose, 15; pH 5.0 ± 0.2. The media were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C pressure of 15 psi for 15 min. The culture was incubated and shaken at 30 °C for 48 hr in an orbital shaking incubator at 150 rpm before transferring to the production medium [25].

Solid state fermentation

SSF was performed to study the effect of various physicochemical parameters required for the optimum production of enzymes and saccharification content by Trichoderm sp. prior to inoculation, the agriculture waste was sterilized in an autoclave for 20 min at 121 °C and 1.2 atmospheres. To each 50 ml Erlenmeyer flask, 5 g of sterilized agriculture waste, 5 × 105 spores/g, and appropriate amount of water (10 % moisture) were added. The physico-chemical parameters included incubation time, incubation temperature (20, 30, 35, 40, 45 °C), moisture content of the substrate (10 %, 20 %, 40 %, 60 %, 100 %) and incubation pH (4 to 8) were optimized. The pH was adjusted using 0.1 M NaOH or HCl. Studies were also performed to evaluate the influence of different carbon sources (glucose, maltose, starch, sucrose, lactose at 1 % w/v) and nitrogen sources (yeast extract, urea, sodium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, ammonium chloride at 1 % w/v) when added to the fermentation medium contained agriculture waste. Each experiment is done in 3 sets.

Enzyme extraction

Crude enzyme was extracted by mixing a 5 g of fermented matter with 50 ml distilled water on a rotary shaker (180 rpm/min) overnight. The suspension was then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was designated as a crude extract.

Enzyme assays

Carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase), filter paperase (FPase), pectinase (PGase) and xylanase (Xylase) activities were assayed by determining the liberated reducing end products using glucose, glucose, galacturonic acid and xylose as standards, respectively [26]. Substrates used were CM-cellulose, filter paper, polygalacturonic acid and birchwood xylan for CMCase, FPase, PGase and Xylase, respectively. The reaction mixture (0.5 ml) contained 1 % substrate, 0.05 M sodium acetate buffer pH 5.5 and 0.1 ml crude extract. Assays were carried out at 37 °C for 1 h. Then 0.5 ml dinitrosalicylic acid reagent was added to each tube. Then the reaction mixture was mixed well, and heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min. After cooling to room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 560 nm. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme which liberated one μmol of reducing sugar per min under standard assay conditions. All the experimental work was run in triplicates.

Protein determination

Protein concentration was determined according to the dye binding method of Bradford [27] with bovine serum albumin as standard.

Determination of total reducing sugars

Total reducing sugars were determined by the method of Miller [26]. The reaction mixture contained 0.5 ml of crude extract and 0.5 ml dinitrosalicylic acid reagent. The tubes were heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min. After cooling to room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 560 nm. Glucose served as the calibration standard for total reducing sugar determination.

Determination of total soluble carbohydrates

Total soluble carbohydrates were determined by the method of Dubois et al. [28]. The reaction mixture contained 25 μl of a 4:1 mixture of phenol and water, 0.8 ml of crude extract and 2 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid. Then mixed well, and heated in a boiling water bath for 30 min. The absorbance was determined at 480 nm. Glucose served as the calibration standard for total carbohydrate determination.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were statistically analyzed as a randomized complete block design with three replicates by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the statistical package software SAS (SAS Institute Inc., 2000, Cary, NC., USA). Comparisons between means were made by F-test and the least significant differences (LSD) at level P = 0.05. Correlations coefficient among the different parameters were also calculated by SAS.

Results and discussion

Production of CMCase, FPase, PGase and Xylase were tested using alkali pretreated wheat bran, date's seeds, wild grass and palm leaves as substrates by T. reesei, T. viride, T. harzianum and T. virens in solid state fermentation (SSF). Figure 1 showed that the maximum production of CMCase, FPase, Xylase were obtained by T. virens (123.26, 49.3 and 348 U/g solid, respectively) in SSF containing alkali pre-treated wheat bran, while maximum PGase activity was obtained by T. reesei (499.9 U/g solid) in SSF containing alkali pre-treated palm leaves. Among the different solid substrates screened, saccharification of alkali pre-treated wheat bran supported maximum yields of total carbohydrates and reducing sugars (45 and 38.92 mg/g solid, respectively) by T. virens compared with other Trichoderma sp. tested (Fig. 2). There was no relation between total carbohydrate/sugar and enzyme contents, except of wild grasses and wheat bran. This may be attributed to some fungi used the total carbohydrate and sugar as nutrients (produced by enzymes act on certain agricultural residues as palm leaves and date seeds) for growth of fungi, resulted in the depletion of the total carbohydrate and sugar. From these results, the optimization of the production of total carbohydrate, reducing sugar, CMCase, FPase, PGase and Xylase of T. virens using alkali pre-treated wheat bran in SSF was performed in the following studies.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Effect of different organic materials on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase and Xylase by Trichoderma sp. in SSF. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Effect of different organic materials on Saccharification content by Trichoderma sp. in SSF. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Figure 3 shows the time course experiments of CMCase, FPase, Xylase, PGase and protein production by T. virens grown on alkali pretreated wheat bran in SSF. All enzymes and protein exhibited their maximum activities 58.2, 65.6, 372.4, 474 U/g and 8.5 mg/g at 72 hours. However, time course of enzyme cellulase production by Trichoderma spp. was studied using steamed alkali-treated sugarcane bagasse at 30 °C for six days. CMCase biosynthesis was not detected up to 24 hours of incubation and then the enzyme activity increased sharply up to 72 hours and highest CMCase activity was found 1.31 U/ml at 144 hours. FPase production started after a large lag period (about 72 hours) and thereafter the enzyme synthesis increase sharply. The final FPase activity was 0.110 U/ml at 144 hours. Initially, Xylase production was low and at 96 hours a sharp increase in enzyme production was observed and after that the enzyme activity remained constant. The highest Xylase activity was found after 144 hours of incubation which was 13.250 U/ml [29]. Of all four strains of fungi, T. reesei and T. viride were the best cellulase-producing fungi after 72 h offer mutation. A co-culture of T. reesei and T. viride gave better results with wheat straw; the CMCase activities were 560.9 and 212.7 IU, respectively [30]. Another study reported that PGase and Xylase of T. virens, exhibited their maximum activity at day 4 (132 and 75 units/g solid, respectively) [31]. Similarly, Penicillium decumbens was grown on a mixture of corn straw (90 %) and wheat bran (10 %) the maximum activity of Xylase was measured after 4 days of fermentation [32]. Couri et al. [33] also studied the production of Xylase by A. niger using different agroindustrial residues – mango peel and wheat bran – as the solid substrate. The maximum of xylase activity was reached after 72 h and 24 h of fermentation using wheat brain and mango peel, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Effect of incubation time on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase and protein by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as a substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

The increase in glucose production depends on availability of cellulose in the medium and also due to the specific binding of the enzymes with substrates [34]. Saccharification of alkali pre-treated wheat bran in SSF was shown in Fig. 4 with a maximum yield 49.1 mg/g reducing sugars and 71.9 mg/g total carbohydrates obtained at 72 h by T. virens. Begum and Alimon [35] obtained the maximum amount of reducing sugar (4.15 mg/g) measured in sugarcane bagasse after alkali pre-treatment at 24 h by Aspergillus oryzae ITCC-4857.01. They also obtained the highest saccharification for alkali-reated sugarcane bagasse at 96 hrs when water hyacinth induced enzyme was used. They concluded that the saccharification rates of alkali pre-treated substrates were higher than those of enzymatic treated substrates. Similarly, Ja’afaru and Fagade [36] recorded the highest reducing sugar 5.55 mg/ml for alkali pre-treated corn cob at 48 hrs. Time course of enzymatic saccharification of alkali pre-treated bagasse showed rapid initial increase of reducing sugar concentration (up to 8 h) and the rate of this increase was substantially reduced at later stages by T. viride [37].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Effect of incubation time on the saccharification content by T. virenss in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran. Process conditions: initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

The moisture content was an important factor that influences the growth and product yield in SSF [38]. Moisture was reported to cause swelling of the substrates, thereby facilitating better utilization of the substrate by microorganisms [39,40]. The data presented in the Figs. 5 and 6, clearly indicated a maximum production of the enzymes CMCase, FPase, Xylase and PGase ranged from 50 to 70 % moisture. The highest level of protein production was detected at 50 % moisture. For CMCase production moisture level was optimized and found that 40 % moisture level was best for production by T. viridei [41]. Any further increase in the ratio resulted in the decrease of enzyme yields may be due to clumping of solid particles which results in the decrease of interparticle space leading to decreased diffusion of nutrients [40,42]. In contrast, the low moisture content leads to the decreased solubility of nutrients present in the wheat bran thereby decreases enzyme yields [43]. The optimum moisture contents for Xylase production by T. longibrachiatum and A. tereus were 55 and 75 %, respectively [44]. A high production of Xylase of Aspergillus species was detected at 40–50 % moisture using dry koji as substrate [45]. An initial moisture content of 40 % provided better conditions for production of PGase from A. niger than those of 25, 55, and 70 % [46].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Effect of moisture % on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase and protein by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as a substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Effect of moisture % on the saccharification content by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

The incubation temperature is very important in enzyme production [47]. The usual temperature maintained in SSF systems was in the range of 25-32 °C, depending on the growth kinetics of microorganism employed for fermentation purposes [48]. In the present study, the optimum temperature for maximum production of both CMCase and PGase was 30 °C; and 25 °C for FPase and xylase at 35 °C (Fig. 7). The protein content was ranged from 7 to 8 mg/g for all temperatures tested with high level at 35 °C. This was confirmed by maximum reducing sugar (49.2 mg/g) at 25 °C and total carbohydrates (55.5 mg/g) at 30 °C (Fig. 8). In contrast, maximum hydrolysis of substrates occurred at 50 °C [49]. Other studies had reported that 40 °C was found best for CMCase secretion by T. viride [41]. Optimal PGase and Xylase production (130 and 74 units/g solid, respectively) was obtained at 35 °C and 28 °C for T. harzianum, respectively [31]. On the contrary, the maximum activity of PGase and Xylase (120 and 55 units/g solid, respectively) of T. virens was detected at 28 °C and 35 °C, respectively. Similar optimal temperatures of production of PGase and xylanase from Penicillium decumbens [32], A. niger [33], A. oryzae [47], and A. awamori [50] were ranged from 28 °C to 32 °C. In the steady state operation for production of Xylase by A. niger the optimum temperature was 28 °C. Results showed that higher incubation temperature favors biomass growth and lower temperature favors the biosynthesis of xylanase [51]. The maximal PGase production by mixed culture of A. niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae was detected at 37 °C [52].
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Effect of incubation temperature on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase and protein by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as a substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h and initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass). The data presented were averages of three experiments

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Effect of incubation temperature on the saccharification content by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h and initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass).The data presented were averages of three experiments

Figure 9 showed a maximum activity of CMCase (110 U/g), FPase (95 U/g), Xylase (910 U/g), PGase (820 U/g) and protein (9 mg/g) for T. virens at pH 5.0. This was reinforced by a maximum saccharification at the same pH 5 (Fig. 10). Another study reported a maximum degree of saccharification at pH 5.0 by Trichoderma sp. [29]. Maximum CMCase activity (16.2 U/ml) was also obtained at pH 5.5 by T. viride [41]. Optimal PGase and Xylase production of T. harzianum was obtained at pH 7 and 6 with 120 and 70 units/g solid, respectively. On the contrary, the maximum activity of PGase and xylanase of T. virens was detected at pH 6.0 and 7.0 with 140 and 60 units/g solid, respectively [31]. At the medium pH (6.0), the maximal xylanase production by A. terreus under SSF using palm as substrate was reported [53]. Patil and Dayanand [54] reported that pH 5.0 was optimum for the maximum production of pectinases of A. niger using deseeded sunflower head in both submerged and solid state fermentation.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Effect of pH on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase and proein by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as a substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Fig. 10
Fig. 10

Effect of pH on the saccharification content by T. virens in SSF using alkali-pre-treated wheat bran. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

The influence of supplementary carbon sources such as starch, sucrose, maltose, lactose or glucose at 1 % (by mass) on production of CMCase, FPase, Xylase, PGase and protein was studied. The protein content was slightly increased in presences of the carbon sources. While lactose and sucrose enhanced the activity of PGase from 79.2 to 582.9 and 632.6 U/g solid, respectively, starch inhibited all other enzymes (Fig. 11). This was confirmed by maximum saccharification content of 54.9 and 63.4 mg/g reducing sugars respectively by lactose and sucrose, and minimum reducing sugars of 28.1 mg/g by starch (Fig. 12). However, starch and sucrose enhanced the Xylase activities from 40 to 55–60 units/g solid, while all carbon sources exhibited slightly effect on PGase activities for Trichoderma spp. using cantaloupe and watermelon rinds [31]. Botella et al. [50] reported that when 6 % glucose was added as extra carbon source, the production of Xylase and PGase by A. awamori using grape pomace as substrate increased significantly. However, at 8 % both enzyme activities declined. In contrast, when wheat bran was used as the solid substrate, Xylase by A. tamari was resistant to catabolic repression even at 10 % glucose [55]. Alternatively, D-glucose, D-mannose, maltose, sucrose and cellobiose significantly repressed CMCase formation in case of using rice straw and sugar cane bagasse as carbon sources [56].
Fig. 11
Fig. 11

Effect of carbon source (1 %) supplementation on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase and protein by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as a substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 hr, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Fig. 12
Fig. 12

Effect of carbon source (1 %) supplementation on the saccharification content by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Studies on supplementation of nitrogen sources such as ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, ammonium chloride, yeast extract or urea at 1 % concentration to the solid substrates showed various effects on CMCase, FPase, Xylase, PGase and protein production by T. virens (Fig. 13). All nitrogen sources enhanced the saccharification enzymes with significant enhancement for CMCase (from 86.9 to 204 U/g), PGase (from 491.1 to 939.4 U/g) and Xylase (from 455 to 1064 U/g) by yeast extract and urea. This was confirmed by maximum saccharification from 47.2 to 157.1 and 162.1 by yeast extract and urea respectively (Fig. 14). However, ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, yeast extract and urea increased PGase activities of T. harzianum from 90 to 110–113 units/g solid and decreased PGase activities of T. virens. The high level of protein was detected in presence of KNO3. However, urea increased Xylase activities of T. harzianum and T. virens [30]. Among nitrogen sources yeast extract was the best to enhance the enzyme activity FPase (0.281 ± 0.13 IU/g) and CMCase (3.66 ± 0.02 IU/g) by A. fumigatus grown on alkali-pretreated sawdust [57]. Another study reported the highest level of enzyme formation expressed in terms of specific activity with ammonium chloride with both rice straw and sugar cane bagasse by A. terreus DSM 826. Other nitrogen sources namely ammonium sulphate, potassium nitrate and ammonium oxalate gave also considerable amounts of CMCase with both wastes as compared with sodium nitrate [56].
Fig. 13
Fig. 13

Effect of nitrogen source (1 %) supplementation on the production of CMCase, FPase, PGase, Xylase and protein by T. virens in SSF using alkali pre-treated wheat bran as a substrate. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Fig. 14
Fig. 14

Effect of nitrogen source (1 %) supplementation on the saccharification content by T. virens in SSF using alkali-pre-treated wheat bran. Process conditions: incubation times 72 h, initial moisture content 50 % (by volume per mass) and temperature 30 °C. The data presented were averages of three experiments

Comparison of CMCase, FPase, PGase and xylase production pattern by T. virens used in this study and other microorganisms confirmed the potential of T. virens for economic hydrolytic enzymes production (Table 1). In fact, the present microorganism was better producer of FPase, CMCase, Xylase and PGase (approximately 49.3, 123.26, 348 and 499.9 units/g solid, respectively) compared to other microorganisms.
Table 1

Sacchrification enzyme activities of different fungal isolates grown on lignocellulosic substrates under solid state fermentation

Enzyme source

Carbon source

Enzyme activities (U/g dry substrate)

References

FPase

CMCase

Xylase

PGase

Aspergillus ustus

Rice straw

5.82

12.58

740

-

Shamala and Sreekantiah [58]

Wheat bran

3.78

11.84

615.26

-

Aspergillus soja

Crushed maize

-

-

-

30

Ustok et al. [59]

Aspergillus awamori

Grape pomace

-

-

40

25

Botella et al. [60]

Aspergillus terreus M11

Corn stover

243

581

-

-

Gao et al. [61]

Aspergillus niger KK2

Rice straw

19.5

129

5070

-

Kang et al. [62]

Aspergillus niger

Ordos Plateau

-

-

-

36

Debing et al. [63]

Aspergillus niger

Citrus peel

-

-

65

18

Rodriguez-fernandez et al. [64]

Aspergillus niger

Deseeded sunflower

-

-

-

34

Patil and Dayanand [54]

Myceliophthora sp. IMI 387099

Rice straw

2.44

32.9

900.2

-

Badhan et al. [65]

Wheat straw

1.37

30.8

656.6

-

Bagasse

0.7

6.62

620.1

-

Corn cob

0.31

11.38

411.6

-

Wheat bran

0.74

26.6

128.9

-

Thermoascus aurantiacus

Wheat straw

4.3

956

2973

-

Kalogeris et al. [66]

Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma virens

cantaloupe and watermelon

-

-

80

140

Mohamed et al. [31]

Trichoderma harzianum SNRS3

Rice straw

6.25

111.31

433.75

-

Rahnama et al. [67]

Trichoderma reesei MCG77

Rice bran

2.314

-

-

-

Latifan et al. [68]

Trichoderma virens

Wheat bran

49.3

123.26

348

499.9

Present study

Conclusion

The present study revealed the saccharification potential of T. virens on alkali pre-treated wheat bran as an agricultural waste in SSF. The optimal conditions for production of CMCase, FPase, PGase and xylase and sccharification content utilizing alkali pre-treated wheat bran as the solid substrate in SSF included incubation for 72 h, temperature at 25-35 °C, substrate moisture content of 50-70 % and pH at 5.0.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH) – King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology - the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – award number (11-ENE1527-03). The authors also, acknowledge with thanks Science and Technology Unit, King Abdulaziz University for technical support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
(2)
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
(3)
The Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
(4)
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

References

  1. Kumakura M, Kasai N, Tameda M, Kaetsu I. Method of pretreatment in saccharification and fermentation of waste cellulose resource. US Pat. 1988;4:769–082.Google Scholar
  2. Howard RL, Abotsi E, Jansen Van REL, Howard S. Lignocellulose biotechnology: issues of bioconversion and enzyme production. Afric J Biotechnol. 2003;2:602–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Heck JX, Hertz PF, Ayub MAZ. Cellulase and xylanase production by isolated Amazon Bacillus strains using soybean industrial residue based solid state cultivation. Braz J Microbiol. 2002;33:213–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Baig MMV, Baig MLB, Baig MIA, Yasmeen M. Saccharification of banana agro-waste by cellulolytic enzymes. Afric J Biotechnol. 2004;3:447–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Katzen R, Fowler DE. Ethanol of lignocellulosic waste with utilization of recombinant bacteria. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1994;45:697–707.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. van Wyk JPH, Leogale PB. Saccharification of wastepaper mixtures with cellulase from Penicillium funiculosum. Biotechnol Lett. 2001;23:1849–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Raimbault M. General and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. Elec J Biotech. 1998;1:1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Martins ES, Silva D, Da Silva R, Gomes E. Solid state production of thermostable pectinases from thermophilic Thermoascusurantiacus. Process Biochem. 2002;37:949–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Couto SR, Sanroman MA. Application of solid-state fermentation to food industry – a review. J Food Eng. 2005;22:211–9.Google Scholar
  10. Pandey A. Aspects of fermenter design for solid-state fermentations. Process Biochem. 1991;26:355–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Mathew GM, Pandey A. Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its applicationin lignocellulose saccharification for bio-ethanol production. Renew Energ. 2009;34:421–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan LT, Lee YH, Gharpuray MM. The nature of lignocellulosics and their pretreatments for enzymatic hydrolysis. Advan Biochem Eng. 1982;23:157–87.Google Scholar
  13. Weimer P, Weston W. Relationship between the fine structure of native cellulose and cellulose degradability by the cellulase complexes of Trichoderma reesei and Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985;27:1540–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Broda P, Birch PRJ, Brooks PR, Sims PFG. Lignocellulose degradation by Phanerochaete chrysosporium: gene families and gene expression for a complex process. Mol Microbiol. 1996;19:923–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mach RL, Zeilinger S. Regulation of gene expression in industrial fungi: Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;60:515–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tolan JS, Finn RK. Fermentation of D-xylose to ethanol by genetically modified Klebsiella planticola. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2039–44.Google Scholar
  17. Beck MJ. Fermentation of pentoses from wood hydrolysates. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1993.Google Scholar
  18. Hahn-Hgerdal B, Hallborn J, Jeppsson H, Olsson L, Skoog K, Walfridsson M. Pentose fermentation to alcohol. In: Saddler JN, editor. Bioconversion of forest and agricultural plant residues. Wallingford: CAB International; 1993. p. 231–90.Google Scholar
  19. El-Shishtawy RM, Mohamed SA, Asiri AM, Gomaa AM, Ibrahim IH, Al-Talhi HA. Solid fermentation of wheat bran for hydrolytic enzymes production and saccharification content by a local isolate Bacillus megatherium. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14:29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Brilluet JM, Mercier C. Fractionation of wheat bran carbohydrates. J Sci Food Agric. 1981;32:243–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hui YH. Fruit and fruit processing. Iowa: Black Publishing. Anes; 2006. p. 391–441.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Okia Y, Saito T, Isogai A. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of soft wood thermomechanical pulp. Holzforschung. 2009;63:529–35.Google Scholar
  23. Detroy RW, Cunningham RL, Bothast RJ, Bagby MO, Herman A. Bioconversion of wheat straw cellulose/hemicellulose to ethanol by Saccharomyces uvarum and Pachysolen tannophilus. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24:1105–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lynd LR, Wolkin RH, Grethlein HE. Continuous fermentation of pretreated hardwood and avicel by Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol Bioeng Symposium. 1987;17:265–74.Google Scholar
  25. Duenas R, Tengerdy RP, Correa MG. Cellulase production by mixed fungi in solid-substrate fermentation of bagasse. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995;11:333–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bradford MM. A rapid sensitive method of quantitation micro gram quantities of proteins utilizing the principles of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton J, Rebers P, Smith F. Colorimetric methodfor determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28:350–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahamudand MR, Gomes DJ. Enzymatic saccharification of sugar cane bagasse by the crude enzyme from indigenous fungi. J Sci Res. 2012;4:227–38.Google Scholar
  30. Zia-ullah Khokhar QS, Nadeem M, Irfan M, Wu J, Samra ZQ, Gul I, et al. Enhanced Production of Cellulase by Trichodermareesei Using Wheat Straw as a Carbon Source. World Appl Sci J. 2014;30:1095.Google Scholar
  31. Mohamed SA, Al-Malki AL, Khan JA, Kabli SA, Al-Garni SM. Solid state production of polygalacturonase and xylanase by Trichoderma species using cantaloupe and watermelon rinds. J Microbiol. 2013;51:605–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang X, Chen H, Gao H, Li Z. Bioconversion of corn straw by coupling ensiling and solid-state fermentation. Biores Technol. 2001;78:277–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Couri S, Terzi S, Pinto GS, Freitas S, Da Costa ACA. Hydrolytic enzyme production in solid state fermentation by Aspergillus niger 3T5B8. Process Biochem. 2000;36:255–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Omojasola PF, Jilani OP, Ibiyemi SA. Cellulase production by some fungi cultured on pineapple waste. Nature. 2008;6:64–79.Google Scholar
  35. Begum MF, Alimon AR: Bioconversion and saccharification of some lignocellulosic wastes by Aspergillus oryzae ITCC-4857.01 for fermentable sugar production. Elec J Biotechnol 2011;14(5). www.ejbiotechnology.info/index.php/ejbiotechnology/article/view/v14n53/1355.
  36. Ja’afaru MI, Fagade OE. Cellulase production and enzymatic hydrolysis of some selected local lignocellulosic substrates by a strain of Aspergillus niger. Res J Biol Sci. 2007;2:13–6.Google Scholar
  37. Ahmed FM, Rahman SR, Gomes DJ. Saccharification of sugarcane bagasse by enzymatic treatment for bioethanol production. Malays J Microbiol. 2012;8:97–103.Google Scholar
  38. Ramesh MV, Lonsane BK. Criticalimportance of moisture content of the medium in α-amylase by Bacillus licheniformis M27 in a solid-state fermentation system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;33:501–5.Google Scholar
  39. Kim JH, Hosobuchi M, Kishimoto M, Seki T, Ryu DDY. Cellulase production by a solidstateculture system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985;27:1445–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Nagendra PG, Chandrasekharan M. Lglutaminase production by marine Vibrio costicola under solid-state fermentation using different substrates. J Marine Biotechnol. 1996;4:176–9.Google Scholar
  41. Irfan M, Syed Q, Yousaf M, Nadeem M, Baig S, Jafri SA. Studies on the Pretreatment of wheat straw for improve production of Carboxymethyl Cellulase by Trichoderma viride FBL1 in Solid State fermentation. Acad Arena. 2010;2:18–30.Google Scholar
  42. Babu KR, Satyanarayana T. Production of bacterial enzymes by solid-state fermentation. J Sci Ind Res. 1996;55:464–7.Google Scholar
  43. Feniksova RV, Tikhomirova AS, Rakhleeva BE. Conditions for forming amylase andproteinase in surface culture of Bacillus subtilis. Mikrobiol. 1960;29:745–8.Google Scholar
  44. Gervais P, Molin P. The role of the water in solid state fermentation. Biochem Eng J. 2003;13:85–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Lu W, Li D, Wu Y. Influence of water activity and temperature on xylanase biosynthesis in pilot-scale solid state fermentation by Aspergillus sulphurous. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;32:305–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Castilho LR, Medronho RA, Alves TLM. Production and extraction of pectinases obtained by solid state fermentation of agroindustrial residues with Aspergillus niger. Biores Technol. 2000;71:45–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Smits JP, Rinzema A, Tramper J, van Sonsbeek HM, Knol W. Solid-state fermentation of wheat bran by Trichoderma reeseiQM9414: Substrate composition changes, C balance, enzyme production, growth and kinetics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;46:489–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Lonsane BK, Ghildyal NP, Budiatman S, Ramakrishna SV. Engineering aspects of solid state fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1985;7:258–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Yamane Y, Fujita J, Shimizu R, Hiyoshi A, Fukuda H, Kizaki Y, et al. Production of cellulose- and xylan-degrading enzymes by a koji mold, Aspergillus oryzae, and their contribution to the maceration of rice endosperm cell wall. J Biosci Bioeng. 2002;93:9–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Botella C, Diaz A, de Ory I, Webb C, Blandino A. Xylanase and pectinase production by Aspergillusawamoriongrape pomace in solid state fermentation. Process Biochem. 2007;42:98–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuan QP, Wang JD, Zhang H, Qian ZM. Effect of temperature shift on production of xylanase by Aspergillus niger. Process Biochem. 2005;40:3255–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhou JM, Ge XY, Zhang WG. Improvement of polygalacturonase production at high temperature by mixed culture of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biores Technol. 2011;102:10085–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Lakshmi GS, Rao CS, Rao RS, Hobbs PJ, Prakasham RS. Enhanced production of xylanase by a newly isolated Asperigullus terreus under solid state fermentation using palm industrial optimization. Biochem Eng J. 2009;48:51–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Patil SR, Dayanand A. Optimization of process for the production of fungal pectinases from deseeded sunflower head in submerged and solid-state conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97:2340–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Farani De Souza D, Marques De Souza CG, Peralta RM. Effect of easily metabolizable sugars in the production of xylanase by Aspergillus tamarii in solid state fermentation. Process Biochem. 2001;36:835–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Abdel-Fatah OM, Hassan MM, Elshafei AM, Haroun BM, Atta HM, Othman AM: Physiological studies on carboxymethyl cellulase formation by Aspergillus terreus DSM 826. Braz J Microbiol 2012;43:01–11.Google Scholar
  57. Gilna VV, Khaleel KM. Cellulase enzyme activity of aspergillus fumigatus from mangrove soil on lignocellulosic substrate. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2011;3:132–4.Google Scholar
  58. Shamala TR, Sreekantiah KR. Production of cellulases and D-xylanase by some selected fungal isolates. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1986;8:178–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Ustok FI, Canan TC, Gogus N. Solid-state production of polygalacturonase by Aspergillus sojae ATCC 20235. J Biotechnol. 2007;127:322–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Botella C, de Ory I, Webb C, Cantero D, Blandino A. Hydrolytic enzyme production by Aspergillus awamori on grape pomace. Biochem Eng J. 2005;26:100–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Gao J, Weng H, Zhu D, Yuan M, Guan F, Xi Y. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from thermoacidophilic fungal Aspergillus Terreus M11 under solid state cultivation of corn stover. Biores Technol. 2008;99:7623–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Kang SW, Park YS, Lee JS, Hong SI, Kim SW. Production of cellulose and hemicellulases by Aspergillus niger KK2 from lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol. 2004;91:151–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Debing J, Peijun L, Stagnitti F, Xianzhe X, Li L. Pectinase production by solid fermentation from Aspergillus niger by a new prescription experiment. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2006;64:244–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Rodriguez-Fernndez DE, Rodriguez-Len JA, de Carvalho JC, Sturm W, Soccol CR. The behavior of kinetic parameters in production of pectinaseand xylanase by solidstate fermentation. Biores Technol. 2011;102:10657–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Badhan AK, Chadha BS, Kaur Saini HS, Bhat MK. Production of multiple xylanolytic and cellulolytic enzymes by thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora sp. IMI 387099. Biores Technol. 2007;98:504–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Kalogeris E, Fountoukides G, Kekos D, Macris BJ. Design of a solid state bioreactor for thermophilic microorganisms. Biores Technol. 1999;67:313–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Nooshin R, Suhaila M, Kalsom MSU, Hooi LF, Nor Aini AR, Arbakariya AB. Effect of Alkali Pretreatment of Rice Straw on Cellulase and Xylanase Production By Local Trichoderma harzianum SNRS3 Under Solid State Fermentation. BioRes. 2013;8:2881–96.Google Scholar
  68. Latifian M, Hamidi-Esfahani Z, Barzegar M. Evaluation of culture conditions for cellulose production by two Trichoderma reesei mutants under solid state fermentation conditions. Biores Technol. 2007;9:3634–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© El-Shishtawy et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us