Open Access

The CD-loop of PAI-2 (SERPINB2) is redundant in the targeting, inhibition and clearance of cell surface uPA activity

  • Blake J Cochran1,
  • Lakshitha P Gunawardhana1, 2,
  • Kara L Vine1,
  • Jodi A Lee1,
  • Sergei Lobov1 and
  • Marie Ranson1Email author
BMC Biotechnology20099:43

Received: 29 December 2008

Accepted: 14 May 2009

Published: 14 May 2009



Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 (PAI-2, SERPINB2) is an irreversible, specific inhibitor of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA). Since overexpression of uPA at the surface of cancer cells is linked to malignancy, targeting of uPA by exogenous recombinant PAI-2 has been proposed as the basis of potential cancer therapies. To this end, reproducible yields of high purity protein that maintains this targeting ability is required. Herein we validate the use in vitro of recombinant 6 × His-tagged-PAI-2 lacking the intrahelical loop between C and D alpha-helices (PAI-2 ΔCD-loop) for these purposes.


We show that PAI-2 ΔCD-loop expressed and purified from the pQE9 vector system presents an easier purification target than the previously used pET15b system. Additionally, PAI-2 ΔCD-loop gave both higher yield and purity than wild-type PAI-2 expressed and purified under identical conditions. Importantly, absence of the CD-loop had no impact on the inhibition of both solution phase and cell surface uPA or on the clearance of receptor bound uPA from the cell surface. Furthermore, uPA:PAI-2 ΔCD-loop complexes had similar binding kinetics (KD ~5 nM) with the endocytosis receptor Very Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (VLDLR) to that previously published for uPA:PAI-2 complexes.


We demonstrate that the CD-loop is redundant for the purposes of cellular uPA inhibition and cell surface clearance (endocytosis) and is thus suitable for the development of anti-uPA targeted cancer therapeutics.


Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 (PAI-2) is a clade B serine protease inhibitor (SERPIN) that is found as both a 60 kDa glycoprotein and a non-glycosylated 47 kDa form [1]. Both forms efficiently inhibit soluble or receptor-bound urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) [1, 2] by the classical serpin inhibitory mechanism resulting in irreversible inhibition of the enzyme [3]. The majority of expressed PAI-2 is not secreted and this may be linked to an inefficient, mildly hydrophobic internal signal peptide [4, 5]. Thus, whilst PAI-2 levels in plasma are normally too low to be detected, in conditions such as pregnancy, some myelomonocytic leukemias and in inflammatory tissue, PAI-2 is consistently detected in plasma and other body fluids as both a glycoprotein and in the 47 kDa form [59]. This suggests a role for PAI-2 in extracellular protease inhibition in vivo.

We have previously shown that exogenous PAI-2 efficiently inhibits cell surface uPA receptor (uPAR)-bound uPA leading to the rapid clearance of the inhibited complex from the cell surface via receptor mediated endocytosis [2]. This involves interactions with endocytosis receptors of the Low Density Lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family leading to delivery of uPAR/uPA/PAI-2 to endosomes and lysosomes [2, 10, 11]. Tumour overexpression of uPA/uPAR and the related uPA inhibitor PAI-1 (SERPINE1) strongly correlates to metastatic potential [1216] and poor patient prognosis [1720], but the presence of PAI-2 is associated with benign tumours and increased, relapse-free survival [9]. As such, we proposed that the ability of PAI-2 to remove cell surface uPA and hence proteolytic activity, without activation of the pro-mitogenic/motogenic signalling pathways associated with PAI-1 [9, 11], accounts for the differential prognosis seen for PAI-2 versus PAI-1 [911].

Therefore, the ability of PAI-2 to specifically target uPA and hence tumour cells without interacting with components of the ECM or modifying other cellular behaviours that may promote tumour cell behaviour (unlike PAI-1) [11], supports the use of exogenous PAI-2 as the basis of uPA targeted cancer treatments. Promising results using bismuth-213 labelled PAI-2 have been obtained in a number of in vitro, in vivo and preclinical evaluations which show clear cell targeting specificity and tumour efficacy with minimal side effects in relevant animal models [2127]. These studies used full length wild-type PAI-2, but it may be possible to utilise smaller, more easily producible PAI-2 constructs. This would require validation in terms of its extracellular uPA inhibitory and clearance functions.

Previous studies have reported the purification of PAI-2 from placenta [28], cultured human monocytes [29], transfected CHO cells [30, 31], baculovirus infected insect larvae [32], yeast [33] and Escherichia coli [30, 3443]. Methods of PAI-2 expression in E. coli have generally utilised a one or two step purification procedure, usually involving metal affinity chromatography and/or ion exchange chromatography. The shift in the literature towards affinity tag based systems for the production of recombinant PAI-2 constructs [3439] allows for the purification of PAI-2 under milder, native conditions and avoidance of denaturation/renaturation [35] or extreme pH treatment [30] as used previously. The presence of an N-terminal 6 × His-tag has previously been shown to have no significant impact on the uPA inhibitory activity of PAI-2 [36]. Generally, His-tags are believed to have no effect on overall protein structure [44].

An issue associated with the purification of recombinant wild-type PAI-2 is that PAI-2 contains a 33 amino acid intrahelical loop between alpha helices C and D (known as the CD-loop) which is accessible for cleavage in both E. coli or mammalian expression systems [34]. This results in two fractions of recombinant PAI-2 which retain inhibitory activity but require additional purification steps such as ion-exchange chromatography [34]. Di Giusto et al. [38] showed that 6 × His-tagged PAI-2 lacking the CD-loop (termed PAI-2 ΔCD-loop) can be purified with a one-step procedure and exhibited identical soluble phase uPA inhibitory activity.

The functionality of the CD-loop has been described primarily in an intracellular context and remains somewhat controversial [9]. The CD-loop is involved in transglutaminase mediated cross-linking to cellular and ECM proteins [43, 45], although the functional significance of this cross-linking is unknown. Interestingly, cross-linked PAI-2 maintains uPA inhibitory activity. The CD-loop is believed to be highly mobile [34] and as such the crystal structure of PAI-2 has only been resolved for a CD-loop deletion mutant [42].

Altogether, this suggests that PAI-2 ΔCD-loop, being easy to produce and purify in addition to retaining uPA inhibitory activity, could be used as an exogenous uPA targeting substitute for wild-type PAI-2 in a therapeutic setting. To this end, we compared the expression and purification of 6 × His-tagged wild type PAI-2 and PAI-2 ΔCD-loop and show for the first time that the cell bound uPA inhibitory activity and rapid clearance of uPAR/uPA by PAI-2 is not compromised by the 6 × His-tagged form lacking the CD-loop.

Results and discussion

Expression and purification of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop

Expression and purification of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop from both the pET15b and pQE9 vector systems yielded a product migrating as a major band at 45 kDa (Figure 1). This corresponds to the expected molecular weight of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop and was confirmed via western blotting with a monoclonal antibody to PAI-2 (data not shown). The PAI-2 ΔCD-loop from the pQE9 system contained fewer impurities (seen as lower molecular weight bands; Figure 1) compared to PAI-2 ΔCD-loop from pET15b expressed and purified under similar conditions (Figure 1, compare lanes 1 and 2). The abundance of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop expressed and purified from the pQE9 versus the pET15b system was found to be ~95% pure compared to ~74%, respectively, as measured by densitometry. The purity of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop was confirmed via HPLC, with integration of the elution profile giving PAI-2 ΔCD-loop an abundance of ~95% (Figure 2). The expression and purification of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop using the pQE9 system regularly achieved yields between 10 and 15 mg/L of culture. Wild-type PAI-2 expressed and purified using the pQE9 system was less pure (Figure 1, compare lanes 1 and 3) and of lower yield (~5 mg/L) compared to PAI-2 ΔCD-loop. When visualised by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, wild-type PAI-2 yielded two bands that were identified as PAI-2 via western blotting (data not shown). This confirms our previous observation that a portion of wild-type PAI-2 is cleaved in the CD-loop [34], which would require further purification steps to obtain a homogenous protein population.
Figure 1

SDS-PAGE analysis of highly enriched recombinant PAI-2 proteins. 10 μg of total protein from PAI-2 ΔCD-loop purified from either pET15b (lane 1) or pQE9 (lane 2), or wild-type PAI-2 from pQE9 (lane 3) were fractionated by a 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The slight difference in size between PAI-2 ΔCD-loop from pET15b and pQE9 is due to differences in tag/linker length. * marks cleaved PAI-2 in wild-type population as mentioned in text.

Figure 2

Quantitative analysis of the purification of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop from pQE9. Protein (100 μL) was injected onto a cation exchange column and eluted using a linear NaCl gradient (0–1 M) at 1 mL/min. PAI-2 ΔCD-loop was detected at 280 nm with a RT of 42.606 min. Integration of the peak corresponding to PAI-2 ΔCD-loop measured the purity at 94.5%. The green line indicates the relative amount of buffer B (MES pH 5.0, 1 M NaCl) to buffer A (MES pH 5.0). Insert: Relative retention times hatand purity as calculated from AUC using Empower Pro V2 (Waters) software. RT = retention time.

Electrospray Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS)

The mass spectrometry data presented here is the first spectrum of any PAI-2 construct to be published. The ESI-MS spectrum of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop (Figure 3) shows a pattern of multiply charged ions (13+ to 16+) in the m/z range of 2700–3500 consistent for the 45 kDa monomeric species. The calculated molecular weight of 44496.72 Da is in agreement with the theoretical monoisotopic molecular weight of 44480.16 Da. In addition, five higher charge states (20+ to 24+) from m/z 3,700 – 4,500 representing an 89 kDa dimeric species were also observed. Lobov et al. [34] showed that whilst less polymergenic than wild-type PAI-2, PAI-2 ΔCD-loop was still able to form dimers and higher order aggregates.
Figure 3

A positive ion ESI-MS of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop from pQE9 in 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.8) containing 0.1% formic acid. The m/z spectrum shows a Gaussian-type distribution of multiply charged ions ranging from m/z 2700 – 4500. Charge states are indicated. The monomeric (A) and dimeric (B) forms of the protein gave a measured molecular mass of 44496 Da (± 0.89) and 88961 Da (± 0.84), respectively. Mass was calculated using MassLynx MS software (Waters) and caesium iodide was used for external calibration.

The absence of the CD-loop does not affect the solution phase or cell surface uPA activity inhibitory function of PAI-2

To ensure that the PAI-2 ΔCD-loop construct generated in this study retained uPA inhibitory activity, excess PAI-2 ΔCD-loop was incubated with uPA and analysed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Figure 4A). A band at ~95 kDa was observed corresponding to covalently complexed uPA:PAI-2 ΔCD-loop. Additionally, western blotting of this complex formation using a monoclonal antibody to uPA showed no free uPA remained after incubation (Figure 4B). PAI-2 ΔCD-loop and wild-type PAI-2 gave super-imposable kinetic inhibition curves for HMW-uPA in solution (Figure 4C), confirming that the absence of the CD-loop does not affect uPA inhibitory activity of PAI-2. Di Giusto et al. [38] showed that His-tagged PAI-2 ΔCD-loop had the same second order rate constant (2.40 × 106M-1 s-1) as the published wild-type non-recombinant form. Moreover, we show that the inhibitory activity of both variants was also identical towards cell surface receptor bound uPA as there were no significant differences seen between the two PAI-2 forms (Figure 4D). This indicates that the absence of the CD-loop is also redundant in the more physiological setting of the cell surface. This is to be expected as the majority of serpin sequence deviation occurs in the loops joining secondary structures [46]. Moreover, the intrahelical CD-loop is a unique feature of clade B serpins [47] which is absent (and hence not required for function) in inhibitory serpins of all other clades.
Figure 4

PAI-2 ΔCD-loop efficiently inhibits both solution phase and cell bound uPA activity. A. PAI-2 ΔCD-loop is able to form SDS stable complexes with uPA. PAI-2 ΔCD-loop was incubated in a 2:1 molar ratio with HMW-uPA for 30 min and analysed by a 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. B. Immunoblot analysis of complex formation between uPA and PAI-2 ΔCD-loop using a monoclonal antibody to the A-chain of uPA (~30 kDa), indicating that no residual uPA remains in the sample. C. Kinetic inhibition curves for wild-type PAI-2 (dark red) versus PAI-2 ΔCD-loop (bright pink) against HMW-uPA in solution. The uPA fluorogenic substrate was briefly pre-incubated with the PAI-2 forms or buffer alone (open circles) and the assays initiated by the addition of HMW-uPA. Fluorescence units were converted to a percentage of the maximal (uninhibited) uPA activity. Values shown are the means of triplicate determinations. Errors (<10%) are not shown for clarity of presentation. D. U937 cells were incubated with uPA fluorogenic substrate in the absence or presence of wild-type PAI-2 (filled bars) or PAI-2 ΔCD-loop (open bars) for 1 h at 37°C. Fluorescence units were converted to a percentage of the maximal (uninhibited) uPA activity. Values shown are means ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.001 compared to inhibited samples for both PAI-2 forms.

Removal of the CD-loop does not affect the clearance of uPA from the cell surface

Preliminary dot-blot analysis suggested that removal of the CD-loop of PAI-2 has no impact on the interaction between uPA complexed PAI-2 and members of the LDLR family [10]. Surface plasmon resonance was used to measure the affinity of uPA complexed with PAI-2 ΔCD-loop or wild-type PAI-2 for the endocytosis receptor VLDLR. The KD of both uPA:PAI-2 ΔCD-loop and uPA:wild-type PAI-2 for VLDLR was found to be ~5 nM (Table 1) and these interaction best fit a 1:1 binding model. Additionally, no interaction was observed between VLDLR and either PAI-2 ΔCD-loop or wild-type PAI-2 alone (Table 1). These findings are in agreement with those of Croucher et al. [11], which was determined using non-tagged, wild-type PAI-2. Additionally, when complexed with uPA, both wild-type PAI-2 and PAI-2 ΔCD-loop lead to an almost two-fold increase in the amount of uPA endocytosed by MCF-7 cells relative those treated with uPA alone (Figure 5). Importantly, there was no significant difference between cells treated with uPA:wild-type PAI-2 and uPA:PAI-2 ΔCD-loop. Pre-treatment of cells with the LDLR antagonist RAP significantly reduced the amount of uPA internalised in all treatments (Figure 5). This also confirms the role of VLDLR in endocytosis, as it is the only LDLR family member of relevance on MCF-7 cells [11].
Table 1

Kinetic parameters of the interaction between PAI-2 ΔCD-loop or wild-type PAI-2 and VLDLR, both alone and in complex with uPA.


Binding Model


(M-1 s-1)






PAI-2 wild-type

No binding





uPA:PAI-2 wild-type


3.75 × 105

(± 1.1 × 105)

1.44 × 10-3

(± 0.39 × 10-3)


(± 0.64)


PAI-2 ΔCD-loop

No binding





uPA:PAI-2 ΔCD-loop


4.16 × 105

(± 1.8 × 105)

1.36 × 10-3

(± 0.23 × 10-3)


(± 0.56)


Values were determined using surface plasmon resonance. Binding data was fitted using the BIAevaluation 4.0 software. The binding model chosen represents that with the lowest χ2 value. (Values are the average ± SEM, n = 3).

Figure 5

Cellular internalisation of uPA is equivalent between wild-type PAI-2 and PAI-2 ΔCD-loop as determined by flow cytometry. MCF-7 cells were incubated with 10 nM uPA:Alexa488, either alone or in complex with wild-type PAI-2 or PAI-2 ΔCD-loop for 1 h at 37°C. Any surface bound uPA:Alexa488 remaining was quenched by incubation with 4 μg/mL anti-Alexa488 polyclonal antibody for 30 min prior to analysis by dual colour flow cytometry. Values shown are means ± SEM (n = 3) as a percentage of uPA only treatment.*p < 0.005 compared to internalisation in the absence of RAP for each treatment.


This study shows that the CD-loop of PAI-2 plays no role in the inhibition and clearance of cell surface uPA in vitro. Additionally, we confirm previous findings indicating that the use of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop is advantageous compared to wild-type PAI-2 due to superior purity and yield of the recombinant protein under identical conditions. As such, PAI-2 ΔCD-loop appears to present a desirable basis for the development of PAI-2 based uPA targeted cancer therapies. Furthermore, tumour uptake increases as protein size is decreased [48], suggesting that this shortened but fully active form of PAI-2 may not only be simpler to express and purify than wild-type PAI-2, but also exhibit a favourable pharmacokinetic profile.



The expression vectors pET15b/PAI-2 wild-type and pET15b/PAI-2 ΔCD-loop were a kind gift from Prof. T Ny (Umea University, Sweden); pQE9 vector and M15 [pREP4] E. coli obtained from QIAgen; Oligonucleotides from Sigma-Genosys; phorbyl myristate acetate (PMA) from Sigma-Aldrich; Alexa488 labelling kit, Alexa488 polyclonal antibody and BL21 Star (DE3) E. coli from Invitrogen; IPTG from Applichem; Monoclonal antibodies against human uPA (#394) and human PAI-2 (#3750), and high molecular weight (HMW)-uPA from American Diagnostica; Ampicillin and kanamycin from Amresco; TALON metal affinity resin from Clontech; BamHI restriction enzyme, shrimp alkaline phosphatase and T4 DNA ligase from Fermentas; CM5 BIAcore chip and PD-10 desalting columns from GE BioSciences; Recombinant VLDLR ligand binding region was a gift from D Blaas (Medical University of Vienna, Austria); Z-Gly-Gly-Arg-AMC from Calbiochem; Wild-type PAI-2 from PAI-2 Pty Ltd; Pfu HS Fusion II DNA polymerase from Stratagene.

Generation of pQE9/PAI-2 constructs

Wild-type PAI-2 and PAI-2 ΔCD-loop cDNAs lacking the 3' untranslated region were amplified from pET15b using Pfu HS Fusion II DNA polymerase and the following primers: 5'-GCGCGGATCCCTCGAGGATCTTTGTGTGGC-3' (forward) and 5'-GCGCGGATCCTTAGGGTGAGGAAAATCTGCCG-3' (reverse). Primers contained BamHI sites to allow for ligation into pQE9. Both vector and insert were digested with BamHI, linear pQE9 de-phosphorylated using shrimp alkaline phosphatase and the insert ligated into the vector using T4 DNA ligase. Successful insertion and sequence integrity were confirmed using restriction digestion and DNA sequencing.

Expression and purification of PAI-2

Purified pET15b/PAI-2 ΔCD-loop, pQE9/PAI-2 ΔCD-loop and pQE9/PAI-2 wild-type vectors were transformed into chemically competent BL21 Star (DE3) and M15 [pREP4] cells, respectively, using standard methods. Cells were cultured overnight at 37°C with shaking in LB containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 25 μg/mL kanamycin (only for M15 [pREP4] cells). A 20 mL aliquot of this starter culture was added to 1 L Z-broth (LB with the addition of 1 g/L glucose and 0.49 g/L CaCl2.2H2O) and grown to an OD600 of ~0.6. Expression of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM IPTG and the culture incubated for a further 4 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 15 mL of ice-cold loading buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.0, containing 5 mM imidazole for pET15b expressed PAI-2 ΔCD-loop) and lysed using a French press (Thermo, USA). The cell lysate (~20 mL) was then incubated with 2.5 μg of DNase for 30 min on ice and cell debris pelleted by centrifugation at 17,000 g for 30 min. The supernatant was loaded onto equilibrated TALON metal affinity resin at a rate of 1 mL/min. Unbound proteins were removed using 10 column volumes of loading buffer followed by 10 column volumes of wash buffer containing optimised imidazole concentrations (data not shown) (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole for pQE9, 15 mM for pET15b, pH 7.0). Bound protein was eluted from the column using elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 150 mM imidazole, pH 7.0). Purification was analysed using SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and the successful isolation of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop determined by western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against PAI-2. Samples were buffer exchanged into phosphate buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.0) to remove imidazole for subsequent experiments.

Cation-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

The purity of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop expressed and purified from pQE9 was further determined by ion exchange chromatography on a BioSuite SP 10 μm, C × C (7.5 cm × 75 mm) cation exchange semi-preperative column (Waters, UK). The column was pre-equilibrated with approximately 10 column volumes of 20 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES, pH 5.0). PAI-2 ΔCD-loop (100 μL, ~1 mg/mL) was then loaded and eluted with a linear (curve 6) 0.5 M NaCl salt gradient at 1 mL/min. The data was collected on a photodiode array (PDA) at 280 nm and percent purity determined using Empower Pro V2 (Waters, UK) software.

Electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI-MS)

A positive ion mass spectrum of PAI-2 ΔCD-loop expressed and purified from pQE9 was acquired on a quadrupole time of flight spectrometer (Q-TOF-MS) (Micromass Q-TOF Ultima, Waters, UK) fitted with a Z-spray ionisation source. A sample of freshly prepared protein in PBS pH 7.4 was exchanged into 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 0.1% formic acid and made up to a final concentration of 10 μM. The protein was then injected into the Q-TOF Ultima mass spectrometer (20 μL) and the mass spectrum acquired with a capillary voltage of 2.6 kV, cone voltage of 50 V, source block temperature of 40°C, and a resolution power of 5000 Hz. Ceasium iodide was used for external calibration. The mass spectrum data is presented as raw data, on an m/z scale. Mass was calculated using MassLynx MS software (Waters).

Fluorogenic uPA activity assay

Several substrate and uPA concentrations were used to find the optimum range and to set the gain on a Fluorostar Optima fluorescence plate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany). PAI-2 ΔCD-loop or wild-type PAI-2 were diluted in reaction buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20) and mixed with fluorogenic substrate, Z-Gly-Gly-Arg-AMC in 180 μL reaction buffer. After a brief preincubation at 37°C, HMW-uPA (final concentration 0.675 nM) was added to start the reaction and fluorescence emission measured immediately at 37°C. All assays were performed in triplicate and values corrected by subtracting the background (reaction buffer plus substrate only). For cell based assays, PMA treated U937 cells (used to enhance the expression of unoccupied uPAR [49]) were washed and preincubated with 50 nM HMW-uPA in binding buffer (Phenol red free Hanks buffered salt solution, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% BSA) for 10 min to saturate uPAR. After 2 washes the cells were resuspended in binding buffer to give a final concentration of 5 × 105 cells/mL. To initiate the reaction 100 μL aliquots of the cell suspension were transferred to a 96-well fluor plate containing 100 μL of 0.5 mM substrate +/- PAI-2 in binding buffer pre-equilibrated to 37°C (final concentrations, 0.25 mM substrate, 12.5 or 50 nM PAI-2) and fluorescence emission measured. All assays were performed in triplicate and values corrected by subtracting background fluorescence [binding buffer plus substrate +/- PAI-2 (the presence of PAI-2 made no difference to background levels)]. Differences in uPA activity were tested for significance using an unpaired Student's t-test.

Surface plasmon resonance

Surface plasmon resonance was used to determine the impact of the removal of the CD-loop and presence of the 6 × His-tag on the affinity of uPA:PAI-2 complexes for VLDLR, essentially as described by Croucher et al. [11]. VLDLR was immobilised on a CM5 BIAcore chip, according to the manufacture's instructions. Briefly, the chip was activated with a 1:1 mixture of 0.2 M N-ethyl-N'-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodi-imide and 0.05 M N-hydroxysuccimide. VLDLR was coated onto the chip at 40 μg/mL in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 3) to a level of ~2,000 response units. Unoccupied binding sites were blocked using 1 M ethanolamine, pH 8.5. Ligands were diluted into running buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.005% Tween-20) before application to the BIAcore chip at 20 μL/min. Regeneration was achieved using 100 mM H3PO4. Data was analysed using BIAevaluation software (Version 4), using a blank cell as the reference cell.

Internalisation assays

Internalisation assays were conducted essentially as previously described [2, 10, 11], using the MCF-7 cell line. Briefly, cells were grown for 48 h in 6 well plates to subconfluency, washed with phenol red free hanks buffered salt solution (pH 7.4, containing 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% BSA), then incubated in binding buffer for 1 h at 37°C to allow for receptor recycling. To confirm LDLR specificity, cells were preincubated for 10 min with 200 nM RAP (receptor associated protein). Cells were incubated with 10 nM uPA:Alexa488, both alone and previously complexed with either wild-type PAI-2 or PAI-2 ΔCD-loop for 1 h at 37°C to allow for internalisation. After this incubation period, the cells were washed twice with ice cold binding buffer, harvested using 5 mM EDTA, washed again and resuspended in ice cold binding buffer containing 4 μg/mL Alexa488 quenching polyclonal antibody. After 30 min the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and analysed by dual colour flow cytometry with propidium iodide to exclude non-viable cells as previously described [2]. Differences in the amount of uPA internalised between treatments were tested for significance using the unpaired Student's t-test.



Area under the curve


Extracellular matrix


High molecular weight


High performance liquid chromatography


Low density lipoprotein receptor


Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2


Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1


Phorbyl myristate acetate


Receptor associated protein


Retention time


Urokinase plasminogen activator


Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor


Very low density lipoprotein receptor.



BC and JL are recipients of Australian Postgraduate Awards.

MR is a Cancer Institute NSW Fellow.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong
Current address: Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital


  1. Kruithof EKO, Baker MS, Bunn CL: Biological and clinical aspects of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2. Blood. 1995, 86: 4007-4024.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ejeh F, Croucher D, Ranson M: Kinetic analysis of plasminogen activation inhibitor type-2: urokinase complex formation and subsequent internalisation by carcinoma cell lines. Experimental Cell Research. 2004, 297: 259-271. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gettins PGW: Serpin structure, mechanism, and function. Chemical Reviews. 2002, 102: 4751-4803. 10.1021/cr010170+.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Belin D, Wohlwend A, Schleuning WD, Kruithof EKO, Vassalli JD: Facultative polypeptide translocation allows a single mRNA to encode the secreted and cytosolic forms of plasminogen activators inhibitor 2. EMBO Journal. 1989, 8: 3287-3294.Google Scholar
  5. von Heijne G, Liljeström P, Mikus P, Andersson H, Ny T: The efficiency of the uncleaved secretion signal in the plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 protein can be enhanced by point mutations that increased its hydrophobicity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991, 266: 15240-15243.Google Scholar
  6. Kawano T, Morimoto K, Uemura Y: Partial purification and properties of urokinase inhibitor from human placenta. Journal of Biological Chemistry (Tokyo). 1970, 67: 333-342.Google Scholar
  7. Brenner B: Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Thrombosis Research. 2004, 114: 409-414. 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Astedt B, Lecander I, Ny T: The placental type of plasminogen activator inhibitor, PAI-2. Fibrinolysis. 1987, 1: 203-208. 10.1016/0268-9499(87)90037-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Croucher DR, Saunders DN, Lobov S, Ranson M: Revisiting the biological roles of PAI2 (SERPINB2) in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2008, 8: 535-545. 10.1038/nrc2400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Croucher D, Saunders DN, Ranson M: The urokinase/PAI-2 complex: a new high affinity ligand for the endocytosis receptor low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 10206-10213. 10.1074/jbc.M513645200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Croucher DR, Saunders DN, Stillfried GE, Ranson M: Structural basis of differential signaling by PAI-1 and PAI-2 in breast cancer: Implications for metastatic potential. Biochemical Journal. 2007, 408: 203-210. 10.1042/BJ20070767.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Scherrer A, Wohlwend A, Kruithof EKO, Vassalli JD, Sappino AP: Plasminogen activation in human acute leukaemias. British Journal of Haematology. 1999, 105: 920-927. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01432.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Duffy MJ, Maguire TM, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N: Urokinase plasminogen activator: A prognostic marker in multiple types of cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 1999, 71: 130-135. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199906)71:2<130::AID-JSO14>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Look MP, van Putten WLJ, Duffy MJ, Harbeck N, Christensen IJ, Thomssen C, Kates R, Spyratos F, Fernö M, Eppenberger-Castori S, et al: Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002, 94: 116-128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmitt M, Wilhelm OG, Reuning U, Krüger A, Harbeck N, Lengyel E, Graeff H, Gänsbacher B, Kessler H, Bürgle M, et al: The urokinase plasminogen activator system as a novel target for tumour therapy. Fibrinolysis & Proteolysis. 2000, 14: 114-132. 10.1054/fipr.2000.0079.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van't Veer LJ: Breast cancer metastasis: Markers and Models. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2005, 5: 591-602. 10.1038/nrc1670.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Duffy MJ: The urokinase plasminogen activator system: role in malignancy. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2004, 10: 39-49. 10.2174/1381612043453559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Foekens JA, Peters HA, Look MP, Portengen H, Schmitt M, Kramer MD, Brunner N, Janicke F, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Henzen-Logmans SC, et al: The urokinase system of plasminogen activation and prognosis in 2780 breast cancer patients. Cancer Research. 2000, 60: 636-643.Google Scholar
  19. Ohba K, Miyata Y, Kanda S, Koga S, Hayashi T, Kanetake H: Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor and plasminogen activator inhibitors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: correlation with tumour associated macrophage and prognosis. Journal of Urology. 2005, 174: 461-465. 10.1097/01.ju.0000165150.46006.92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Choong PFM, Nadesapillai APW: Urokinase plasminogen activator system: A multifunction role in tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Orthopadedics and Related Research. 2003, 415S: S46-S58. 10.1097/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Qu CF, Song EY, Li Y, Rizvi SM, Raja C, Smith R, Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Allen BJ: Pre-clinical study of 213Bi labeled PAI2 for the control of micrometastatic pancreatic cancer. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 2005, 22: 575-586. 10.1007/s10585-005-5788-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Rizvi SM, Ranson M, Allen BJ: 213Bi-PAI2 conjugate selectively induces apoptosis in PC3 metastatic prostate cancer cell line and shows anti-cancer activity in a xenograft animal model. British Journal of Cancer. 2002, 86: 1197-1203. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Stutchbury TK, Al-Ejeh F, Stillfried GE, Croucher DR, Andrews J, Irving D, Links M, Ranson M: Preclinical evaluation of 213Bi-labeled plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 in an orthotopic murine xenogenic model of human breast carcinoma. Molecular Cancer Theraputics. 2007, 6: 203-212. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0264.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ranson M, Tian Z, NM A, Rizvi S, Allen BJ: In vitro cytotoxicity of bismuth-213 (213Bi)-labeled-plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (alpha-PAI-2) on human breast cancer cells. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2002, 71: 149-159. 10.1023/A:1013850107791.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Song YJ, Qu CF, Rizvi SM, Li Y, Robertson G, Raja C, Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Perkins AC, Allen BJ: Cytotoxicity of PAI2, C595 and Herceptin vectors labeled with the alpha-emitting radioisotope Bismuth-213 for ovarian cancer cell monolayers and clusters. Cancer Letters. 2006, 234: 176-183. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.03.060.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Abbas Rizvi SM, Li Y, Song EY, Qu CF, Raja C, Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Allen BJ: Preclinical studies of bismuth-213 labeled plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI2) in a prostate cancer nude mouse xenograft model. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 2006, 5: 386-393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Allen BJ, Tian Z, Rizvi SMA, Li Y, Ranson M: Preclinical studies of targeted α therapy for breast cancer using 213Bi-labelled-plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2. British Journal of Cancer. 2003, 88: 944-950. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600838.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wun TC, Reich E: An inhibitor of plasminogen activation from human placenta. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1987, 262: 3646-3653.Google Scholar
  29. Kruithof EK, Vassalli J-D, Schleuning W-D, Mattaliano RJ, Bachman F: Purification and characterization of a plasminogen activator inhibitor from the histiocytic lymphoma cell line U-937. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1986, 261: 11207-11213.Google Scholar
  30. Mikus P, Urano T, Liljestrom P, Ny T: Plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) is a spontaneously polymerising SERPIN. Biochemical characterisation of the recombinant intracellular and extracellular forms. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1993, 218: 1071-1082. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18467.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mikus P, Ny T: Intracellular polymerization of the serpin plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996, 271: 10048-10053. 10.1074/jbc.271.13.7820.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang XW, Sun T, Zhou XF, Zeng XY, Liu X, Gu DX: Expression of human PAI-2 in the baculovirus expression system. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 1998, 21: 175-177. 10.1038/sj.jim.2900559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Steven J, Cottingham IR, Berry SJ, Chinery SA, Goodey AR, Courtney M, Ballance DJ: Purification and characterisation of plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1991, 196: 431-438. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb15834.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lobov S, Wilczynska M, Bergstro F, Johansson LBA, Ny T: Structural bases of the redox-dependent conformational switch in the serpin PAI-2. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2004, 344: 1359-1368. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou A, Jiang X, Dou F, Zhu D, Xu X: Renaturation, purification, and characterization of human plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) accumulated at high level in Escherichia coli. The Journal of Biochemistry. 1997, 121: 930-934.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilczynska M, Lobov S, Ny T: The spontaneous polymerization of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 and Z-antitrypsin are due to different molecular aberrations. FEBS Letters. 2003, 537: 11-16. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00057-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilczynska M, Lobov S, Ohlsson P-I, Ny T: A redox-sensitive loop regulates plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) polymerization. The EMBO Journal. 2003, 22: 1753-1761. 10.1093/emboj/cdg178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Di Giusto DA, Sutherland APR, Jankova L, Harrop SJ, Curmi PMG, King GC: Plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 is highly tolerant to P8 residue substitution–Implications for serpin mechanistic model and prediction of nsSNP activities. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2005, 353: 1069-1080. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Muehlenweg B, Guthaus E, Arroyo De Prada N, Schmitt M, Schmiedeberg N, Kotzsch M, Creutzburg S, Kramer MD, Kessler H, Wilhelm OG, et al: Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies directed to PAI-1 using PAI-1/PAI-2 chimera and PAI-1-derived synthetic peptides. Thrombosis Research. 2000, 98: 73-81. 10.1016/S0049-3848(99)00238-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ye RD, Wun T-C, Sadler JE: cDNA cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of a plasminogen activator inhibitor from human placenta. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1987, 262: 3718-3752.Google Scholar
  41. Antalis TM, Clark MA, Barenes T, Lehrbach PR, Devine PL, Schevzov G, Goss NH, Stephens RW, Tolstoshev P: Cloning and expression of a cDNA coding for a human monocyte-derived plasminogen activator inhibitor. Proccedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1988, 85: 985-989. 10.1073/pnas.85.4.985.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Jankova L, Harrop SJ, Saunders DN, Andrews JL, Bertram KC, Gould AR, Baker MS, Curmi PM: Crystal structure of the complex of plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 with a peptide mimicking the reactive center loop. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001, 276: 43374-43382. 10.1074/jbc.M103021200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Jensen PH, Schuler E, Woodrow GC, Richardson M, Goss NH, Hojrup P, Petersen TE, Ranmussen LK: A unique interhelical insertion in plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 contains three glutamines, Gln83, Gln84, Gln86, essential for transglutaminase-mediated cross-linking. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994, 269: 15394-15398.Google Scholar
  44. Carson M, Johnson DH, McDonald H, Brouillette C, DeLucas LJ: His-tag impact on structure. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 2007, 63: 295-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Jensen PH, Jensen TG, Laug WE, Hager H, Gliemann J, Pepinsky B: The exon 3 encoded sequence of the intracellular serine proteinase inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 is a protein binding domain. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996, 271: 26892-26899. 10.1074/jbc.271.43.26892.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Irving JA, Pike RN, Lesk AM, Whisstock JC: Phylogeny of the serpin superfamily: implications of patterns of amino acid conservation for structure and function. Genome Research. 2000, 10: 1845-1864. 10.1101/gr.GR-1478R.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Silverman GA, Whisstock JC, Askew DJ, Pak SC, Luke CJ, Cataltepe S, Irving JA, Bird PI: Human clade B serpins (ov-serpins) belong to a cohort of evolutionarily dispersed intracellular proteinase inhibitor clades that protect cells from promiscuous proteolysis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2004, 61: 301-325. 10.1007/s00018-003-3240-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas GD, Chappell MJ, Dykes PW, Ramsden DB, Godfrey KR, Ellis JRM, Bradwell AR: Effect of dose, molecular size, affinity, and protein binding on tumor uptake of antibody or ligand: A biomathematical model. Cancer research. 1989, 49: 3290-3296.Google Scholar
  49. Picone R, Kajtaniak LS, Nielsen LS, Behrendt N, Mastronicola MR, Cubellis MV, Stoppelli MP, Pedersen S, Dano K, Blasi F: Regulation of urokinase receptors in monocytelike U937 cells by phorbol ester myristate acetate. Journal of Cell Biology. 1989, 108: 693-702. 10.1083/jcb.108.2.693.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Cochran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.