- Research article
- Open Access
Practical and reliable FRET/FLIM pair of fluorescent proteins
- Dmitry Shcherbo†1,
- Ekaterina A Souslova†1,
- Joachim Goedhart2,
- Tatyana V Chepurnykh3,
- Anna Gaintzeva3,
- Irina I Shemiakina1,
- Theodorus WJ Gadella2,
- Sergey Lukyanov1 and
- Dmitriy M Chudakov1Email author
© Shcherbo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 06 October 2008
- Accepted: 25 March 2009
- Published: 25 March 2009
In spite of a great number of monomeric fluorescent proteins developed in the recent years, the reported fluorescent protein-based FRET pairs are still characterized by a number of disadvantageous features, complicating their use as reporters in cell biology and for high-throughput cell-based screenings.
Here we screened some of the recently developed monomeric protein pairs to find the optimal combination, which would provide high dynamic range FRET changes, along with high pH- and photo-stability, fast maturation and bright fluorescence, and reliable detection in any fluorescent imaging system. Among generated FRET pairs, we have selected TagGFP-TagRFP, combining all the mentioned desirable characteristics. On the basis of this highly efficient FRET pair, we have generated a bright, high contrast, pH- and photo-stable apoptosis reporter, named CaspeR3 (Caspase 3 Reporter).
The combined advantages suggest that the TagGFP-TagRFP is one of the most efficient green/red couples available to date for FRET/FLIM analyses to monitor interaction of proteins of interest in living cells and to generate FRET-based sensors for various applications. CaspeR3 provides reliable detection of apoptosis, and should become a popular tool both for cell biology studies and high throughput screening assays.
- Fluorescence Lifetime
- High Dynamic Range
- Spectral Separation
- High Content Screening
- Fret Efficiency
During the last decade genetically-encoded sensors on the basis of FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) between fluorescent proteins have become popular instruments to study kinetics and localization of different pathways inside living cells [1, 2]. However, their application is limited by relatively low dynamic range (donor/acceptor emission ratio change), which is limited, in its turn, by FRET efficiency. In addition, spectral separation can be problematic due to pronounced cross-talks characteristic for the traditional cyan and yellow FRET partners.
Recent development of orange, red and far-red monomeric fluorescent proteins drastically enriched the palette of available genetically encoded FRET pairs [3–8]. Some of the novel combinations available can provide higher FRET efficiency and more reliable spectral separation of the donor and acceptor fluorescence. Shifting the wavelengths of FRET pairs towards the red part of the spectrum reduces input of cellular autofluorescence and generally increases the FRET efficiency due to increased R0 values [2, 9].
However, the choice of the best appropriate pair is not obvious, both due to the drawbacks found for some of the newly developed orange and red fluorescent proteins and due to unpredictable weak interactions between donor and acceptor, that can lead to enhanced or impaired FRET, depending on the resulting orientation of chromophores. Technical limitations of available microscopy software and hardware further complicate the choice. The lack of comparative information hampers development of FRET-based applications and development of high contrast (i.e., reliably reporting) fluorescent sensors, required for the sensitive studies of molecular biology of cell and for the reliable high throughput and high content screening assays .
Properties of the TagGFP-TagRFP pair
In order to identify the preferable FRET pair consisting of recently generated monomeric fluorescent proteins, we screened the palette of Tag proteins (Evrogen JSC). By directly comparing the amplitude of fluorescence before and after separation of fluorescent proteins (see Additional file 1), the TagGFP-TagRFP pair demonstrated the highest dynamic range among tested FRET pairs, and was further characterized in more detail.
The excitation wavelength required to visualize FRET changes of the TagGFP/TagRFP pair by ratio-imaging is provided by an ordinary FITC/GFP excitation filter or ubiquitous 488 nm laser line, and the two emission signals are acquired using a 500–530 nm (FITC/GFP emission filter) bandpass filter and a 560–600 nm bandpass filter (Cy3/DsRed emission filter) or a 560LP longpass filter, or the like. As can be inferred from Fig. 1A, the direct acceptor (TagRFP) excitation at 488 nm is marginal, giving rise to an almost pure donor (TagGFP) emission spectrum in the absence of FRET (see Fig. 1B, solid line).
Caspase 3 sensor
On the basis of this pair of fluorescent proteins we generated a bright, high contrast, pH- and photo-stable FRET-based apoptosis reporter, named CaspeR3 (Caspase 3 Reporter), constructed of TagRFP and TagGFP connected via 17 a.a. peptide linker containing caspase-3-cleavable motif DEVD  (see Additional file 1 for the construct scheme).
The construct was expressed in E. coli and demonstrated bright fluorescence after overnight growth at 37°C and purification. Further incubation of a sample did not led to essential changes of fluorescence spectra or brightness, indicating profound maturation of both proteins. The cleavage of a sensor by activated form of the caspase 3 resulted in separation of two fluorescent proteins and elimination of FRET. Direct monitoring of the donor/acceptor emission ratio demonstrated up to 5-fold ratio changes upon cleavage of CaspeR3 by recombinant caspase 3 (BioCat GmbH)in vitro (Fig. 1B and Additional file 1). The increase in donor fluorescence intensity was at least 2-fold corresponding to a FRET efficiency of at least 50%. Subsequently, we tested CaspeR3 responsiveness in transiently transfected HeLa cells. Living cells were monitored at 37°C with Leica SP2 confocal microscope (excitation using 488 nm laser line, emission collected at 500–530 nm and 560–650 nm). The fluorescence was evenly distributed in the cytosol and nucleus with no aggregation or non-specific localization observed. Importantly, both green and red signals were reliably stable upon blue excitation in various irradiation conditions for hours. No reversible or irreversible fluorescence bleaching or photoconversion were observed.
Apoptosis was induced by treatment with 2 μM staurosporine (Calbiochem) Approximately 40–50 min after staurosporine infusion (incubation at 37°C), cells demonstrated rapid (within 10 min) and pronounced changes in green-to-red fluorescence signal ratio, indicating activation of caspase 3. Later these cells demonstrated characteristic membrane blebbing. The average contrast in living cells (calculated as donor/acceptor emission ratio change for 5 cells, time point aligned to the median of ratio changes, individual for each cell) reached 3.8-fold (Fig. 1C).
FLIM measurements for the TagGFP and TagGFP-TagRFP pair
2.55 ± 0.05
2.64 ± 0.04
1.57 ± 0.07
1.98 ± 0.07
The FRET efficiency of the uncleaved CaspeR3 (38% based on the phase lifetime) is among the highest measured by FLIM and compares favorably to a red-to-green caspase sensor reported previously, with a FRET efficiency of 25% . Since the FRET efficiency of the cleaved substrate is zero, the dynamic range of the sensor is rather high, indicating that TagGFP-TagRFP FRET pair will be an excellent tool for the high content FLIM based screenings on living cells.
Most reported FRET indicators are based on historically first (BFP)CFP/YFP pairs [12–15]. However, these FRET pairs are not really the most convenient and effective. Indeed, spectral separation of overlapping cyan and yellow emission spectra can never be complete, and use of narrow band-pass filters results in dramatic loss of emission. Besides, the relative high levels of autofluorescence in blue-cyan region of visible spectrum and phototoxicity using near-UV excitation further complicates their application.
Reported FRET pairs containing red fluorescent acceptors suffer from tetramerization and demonstrate lower contrast [16, 17]. The closest competitor of CaspeR3 is a high contrasting caspase-3 indicator MiCy-mKO , However, it was observed that mKO converts from orange to green fluorescent form upon blue light illumination , that can hamper interpretation of FRET changes in this and other mKO-based techniques.
The high extinction coefficient of TagRFP makes it a preferable FRET acceptor for the green fluorescent proteins. It is of note that the actual FRET efficiency is an inverse 6th power distance dependency, leading to a quick drop of the detected FRET efficiency at donor-acceptor proximities above R0. For instance, under similar conditions, we expect that, given the Förster radii 5.28 nm and 5.74 nm for TagGFP-mCherry and TagGFP-TagRFP respectively, the latter would display 1.4-fold more FRET than a sensor comprised of the TagGFP-mCherry pair.
The superior Förster radius is caused by an 1.5-fold increased spectral overlap for the TagGFP-TagRFP pair as compared to the TagGFP-mCherry pair. While not contributing to the FRET efficiency, the significantly increased quantum yield of TagRFP is highly beneficial for acceptor-based ratiometric FRET studies.
Altogether, the combined advantages of the TagGFP-TagRFP make it the FRET pair of choice both for the ratiometric FRET analyses and FLIM assays to monitor interaction of proteins of interest in living cells, as well as to generate high contrast FRET-based genetically encoded sensors for various analites and protein activities.
Cloning and gene construction
For bacterial expression, corresponding PCR-amplified fluorescent proteins genes were sequentially cloned in frame into the pQE30 vector (Qiagen) using BamHI/KpnI and KpnI/HindIII restriction sites. For expression in eukaryotic cells, the CaspeR3 construct was swapped for TurboGFP within the pTurboGFP-N vector (Evrogen) using pre-introduced AgeI/NotI restriction sites.
Protein expression and in vitro spectroscopy
Proteins fused to the N-terminal polyhistidine tag were expressed in E. coli XL1 Blue strain (Invitrogen). The bacterial cultures were centrifuged and the cell pellets re-suspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 buffer and lysed by sonication. The recombinant proteins were purified using TALON metal-affinity resin (Clontech) followed by a desalting step over gel-filtration columns (Bio-Rad). A Varian Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer was used for measuring excitation-emission spectra.
Fluorescence lifetime imaging
Fluorescence lifetime imaging was performed using the wide-field frequency domain approach on a home-build instrument  using a RF-modulated image intensifier (Lambert Instruments II18MD) coupled to a CCD camera (Photometrics HQ) as detector. A 40× objective (Plan NeoFluar NA 1.3 oil) was used for all measurements. The modulation frequency was set to 75.1 MHz. Twelve phase images with an exposure time of 100–200 ms were acquired in a random recording order to minimize artifacts due to photobleaching . An argon-ion laser was used for excitation at 488 nm, passed onto the sample by a 495 nm dichroic mirror and emission light was filtered by a 515/30 nm emission filter. Every FLIM measurement was followed by a reference measurement. The reference was calibrated by averaging three to five FLIM measurements of a 1 mg/ml solution of erythrosine B (cat # 198269, Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) in H2O, which has a known short fluorescence lifetime of 0.08 ns [19, 20]. From the phase sequence an intensity (DC) image and the phase and modulation lifetime image was calculated using Matlab macros. From this data, the lifetime of individual cells was determined using ImageJ http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. Subsequently, average phase and modulation lifetimes ( ± standard deviation) were calculated. For the presentation of lifetime maps, a 3 × 3 smooth filter was applied to the lifetime data. The false-color lifetime maps and 1D and 2D histograms were generated by an ImageJ macro.
This work was supported by grants from Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55005618, from Molecular and Cell Biology Program RAS, from 07-04-12189-ofi, from Rosnauka 02.512.11.2216, program "State Support of the Leading Scientific Schools" NS-2395.2008.4. DMC is supported by Grant of the President of Russian Federation MK-6119.2008.4.
- Piston DW, Kremers GJ: Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007, 32: 407-414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kremers GJ, Goedhart J: Visible fluorescent proteins for FRET" in "Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. "FRET and FLIM Techniques". 2008, 33: 171-224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karasawa S, Araki T, Nagai T, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A: Cyan-emitting and orange-emitting fluorescent proteins as a donor/acceptor pair for fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biochem J. 2004, 381: 307-312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, Tsien RY: Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 1567-1572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Tsien RY: Evolving proteins in mammalian cells using somatic hypermutation. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 1346-1350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shcherbo D, Merzlyak EM, Chepurnykh TV, Fradkov AF, Ermakova GV, Solovieva EA, Lukyanov KA, Bogdanova EA, Zaraisky AG, Lukyanov S, Chudakov DM: Bright far-red fluorescent protein for whole-body imaging. Nat Methods. 2007, 4: 741-746.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merzlyak EM, Goedhart J, Shcherbo D, Bulina ME, Shcheglov AS, Fradkov AF, Gaintzeva A, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov S, Gadella TW, Chudakov DM: Bright monomeric red fluorescent protein with an extended fluorescence lifetime. Nat Methods. 2007, 4: 555-557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaner NC, Lin MZ, McKeown MR, Steinbach PA, Hazelwood KL, Davidson MW, Tsien RY: Improving the photostability of bright monomeric orange and red fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2008, 5: 545-551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goedhart J, Vermeer JE, Adjobo-Hermans MJ, van Weeren L, Gadella TW: Sensitive detection of p65 homodimers using red-shifted and fluorescent protein-based FRET couples. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e1011-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thornberry NA, Rosen A, Nicholson DW: Control of apoptosis by proteases. Adv Pharmacol. 1997, 41: 155-177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keese M, Offterdinger M, Tischer C, Girod A, Lommerse PH, Yagublu V, Magdeburg R, Bastiaens PI: Quantitative imaging of apoptosis commitment in colorectal tumor cells. Differentiation. 2007, 75: 809-818.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mahajan NP, Harrison-Shostak DC, Michaux J, Herman B: Novel mutant green fluorescent protein protease substrates reveal the activation of specific caspases during apoptosis. Chem Biol. 1999, 6: 401-409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tawa P, Tam J, Cassady R, Nicholson DW, Xanthoudakis S: Quantitative analysis of fluorescent caspase substrate cleavage in intact cells and identification of novel inhibitors of apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2001, 8: 30-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takemoto K, Nagai T, Miyawaki A, Miura M: Spatio-temporal activation of caspase revealed by indicator that is insensitive to environmental effects. J Cell Biol. 2003, 160: 235-243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiang JJ, Truong K: Computational modeling of a new fluorescent biosensor for caspase proteolytic activity improves dynamic range. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2006, 5: 41-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawai H, Suzuki T, Kobayashi T, Sakurai H, Ohata H, Honda K, Momose K, Namekata I, Tanaka H, Shigenobu K, et al: Simultaneous real-time detection of initiator- and effector-caspase activation by double fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. J Pharmacol Sci. 2005, 97: 361-368.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elphick LM, Meinander A, Mikhailov A, Richard M, Toms NJ, Eriksson JE, Kass GE: Live cell detection of caspase-3 activation by a Discosoma-red-fluorescent-protein-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer construct. Anal Biochem. 2006, 349: 148-155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Munster EB, Gadella TW: phiFLIM: a new method to avoid aliasing in frequency-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. J Microsc. 2004, 213: 29-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Munster EB, Gadella TW: Suppression of photobleaching-induced artifacts in frequency-domain FLIM by permutation of the recording order. Cytometry A. 2004, 58: 185-194.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bastiaens PI, van Hoek A, Wolkers WF, Brochon JC, Visser AJ: Comparison of the dynamical structures of lipoamide dehydrogenase and glutathione reductase by time-resolved polarized flavin fluorescence. Biochemistry. 1992, 31: 7050-7060.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.