Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Biotechnology

Open Access

High-throughput kinase assays with protein substrates using fluorescent polymer superquenching

  • Frauke Rininsland1Email author,
  • Casey Stankewicz1,
  • Wendy Weatherford1 and
  • Duncan McBranch1
BMC Biotechnology20055:16

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-5-16

Received: 01 March 2005

Accepted: 31 May 2005

Published: 31 May 2005

Abstract

Background

High-throughput screening is used by the pharmaceutical industry for identifying lead compounds that interact with targets of pharmacological interest. Because of the key role that aberrant regulation of protein phosphorylation plays in diseases such as cancer, diabetes and hypertension, kinases have become one of the main drug targets. With the exception of antibody-based assays, methods to screen for specific kinase activity are generally restricted to the use of small synthetic peptides as substrates. However, the use of natural protein substrates has the advantage that potential inhibitors can be detected that affect enzyme activity by binding to a site other than the catalytic site. We have previously reported a non-radioactive and non-antibody-based fluorescence quench assay for detection of phosphorylation or dephosphorylation using synthetic peptide substrates. The aim of this work is to develop an assay for detection of phosphorylation of chemically unmodified proteins based on this polymer superquenching platform.

Results

Using a modified QTL Lightspeed™ assay, phosphorylation of native protein was quantified by the interaction of the phosphorylated proteins with metal-ion coordinating groups co-located with fluorescent polymer deposited onto microspheres. The binding of phospho-protein inhibits a dye-labeled "tracer" peptide from associating to the phosphate-binding sites present on the fluorescent microspheres. The resulting inhibition of quench generates a "turn on" assay, in which the signal correlates with the phosphorylation of the substrate. The assay was tested on three different proteins: Myelin Basic Protein (MBP), Histone H1 and Phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein (PHAS-1). Phosphorylation of the proteins was detected by Protein Kinase Cα (PKCα) and by the Interleukin -1 Receptor-associated Kinase 4 (IRAK4). Enzyme inhibition yielded IC50 values that were comparable to those obtained using peptide substrates. Statistical parameters that are used in the high-throughput community to determine assay robustness (Z'-value) demonstrate the suitability of this format for high-throughput screening applications for detection of inhibitors of enzyme activity.

Conclusion

The QTL Lightspeed™ protein detection system provides a simple mix and measure "turn on" assay for the detection of kinase activity using natural protein substrates. The platform is robust and allows for identification of inhibitors of kinase activity.

Background

Approximately 75% of the drugs in clinical use elicit their pharmacological effects by interactions with receptor or enzyme targets, such as kinases [1, 2]. Methods to screen large chemical libraries for inhibitors of protein kinases include radiometric assays [3], ELISA [4], ATP consumption assays [5] and several fluorescence based assays such as time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) [6], fluorescence polarization (FP) [7, 8], fluorescence energy transfer (FRET) [9] or fluorescence quench assays [10]. Assays such as FRET, FP and fluorescence quench do not require antibodies or radioactive label, and are thus attractive for HTS. However non-antibody based FP and FRET assays are restricted to the use of small, synthetic peptide substrates to monitor kinase activity. While peptide substrates are convenient for HTS purposes, those that bind with high affinity are available for only a small percentage of the >500 kinases encoded by the human genome [11]. Additionally, peptide substrates may diminish the ability to detect inhibitors that bind to docking sites of a native protein substrate or that bind to unique conformational states induced by protein substrate binding [12]. Here we report the detection of phosphorylation of the natural protein substrates Myelin Basic Protein (MBP), Histone H1 and Phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein (PHAS-1) by PKCα and IRAK4 using a modified version of our original assay format [13, 14], which is based on superquenching of fluorescent polyelectrolytes [15, 16]. The assay principle is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Phosphorylated protein binds to the QTL Sensor via specific phosphate binding to metal coordinating ions and inhibits the association of the dye-labeled phosphopeptide (tracer; red "starburst"). The resulting increase in fluorescence signal correlates with the extent of protein phosphorylation.

Results

MBP, Histone H1 and and PHAS-1 proteins were phosphorylated with PKCα and IRAK4 as described in the Methods section. The proteins were used in their native form and were not chemically modified. An enzyme concentration-dependent increase in phosphorylation correlated with increasing fluorescence signal, demonstrating the efficacy of the QTL Lightspeed™ platform for detection of phosphorylated proteins (Figure 2). The detection of MBP phosphorylation worked equally well for protein substrates derived from either bovine or human (not shown). In order to explore the utility of the assay for screening inhibitors, the ATP competitor Staurosporine was used to inhibit enzyme activities using substrates Histone H1, PHAS-1 (Figure 3A) MBP (Figure 3B). For each protein, a concentration of Staurosporine which inhibited enzyme activity by 50% (IC50) was determined to be within the range of the reported value using a peptide substrate (9 nM) [17]: values of 3.8 nM, 1.6 nM and 0.6 nM were obtained for MBP, Histone H1 and PHAS-1, respectively (Figure 3). The IRAK4 protein assay was 3-fold more sensitive than a QTL Lightspeed™ assay performed on a peptide substrate (EC50 = 1.4 nM vs 5 nM). Using MBP as substrate, we were able to obtain IC50 values for Staurosporine of 11.5 nM, which were very similar to those obtained using a peptide substrate (19 nM, not shown).
Figure 2

Enzyme concentration curve using proteins as substrates. MBP (0.5 μg/well) was phosphorylated using various amounts of PKCα and IRAK4 (2A) and Histone H1 and PHAS-1 (0.5 μg/well) were phosphorylated using various amounts of PKCα (2B) for 1 hour at room temperature (~25°C) in a 384-well white Optiplate. Following reaction, QTL Sensor was added for 10 minutes at ~25°C. Then, dye-labeled phosphopeptide tracer was added with a final concentration of 0.5 μM for detection of phosphorylation of MBP or 125 nM for Histone H1 and PHAS-1. The plate was incubated for an additional 30 minutes at ~25°C and fluorescence measured.

Figure 3

Staurosporine inhibition of enzyme activity. A concentration of 8.6 nM PKCα was used to phosphorylated Histone H1 or PHAS-1 for 60 minutes at ~25°C using various concentrations of Staurosporine (3A). Inhibition of PKCα and IRAK4 activities using MBP as a substrate were performed using decreasing concentrations of Staurosproine (3B). Following incubation, QTL Sensor was added and incubated for 10 minutes at ~25°C. Subsequently dye-labeled phosphopeptide tracer was added with a final concentration of 0.5 μM for MBP or 125 nM for Histone H1 and PHAS-1. The plate was incubated for an additional 30 minutes at ~25°C and fluorescence measured.

The robustness of the assay (Z') was determined by performing 10 multiples of phosphorylation reactions using identical assay conditions. The Z' is a statistical parameter used in the drug screening community to evaluate and validate performance of assays [18]. An assay that delivers a Z' of higher than 0.5 is considered to be robust. The Z' was determined using the following equation:

For MBP, high Z' values of 0.84 and 0.8 were obtained for phosphorylation using PKCα and IRAK4, respectively. For PHAS-1 the values were 0.52 and for Histone H1 0.43. Table 1 summarizes the statistical values obtained for the three different substrates.
Table 1

QTL Lightspeed™ Protein Assay Statistical Data18. Statistics are shown for Z' Factor, signal/noise (S/N), signal/background (S/B), signal window (SW) and coefficient of variation (% CV) at maximal substrate phosphorylation. Z'Factor equal to or greater than 0.5 are an indication of a robust assay18. Ten replicate measurements were made to determine the assay statistics.

Protein

Enzyme

Z' Factor

S/N

S/B

SW

%CV

MBP

PKCα

0.84

20.7

2.6

33.4

2.2

MBP

IRAK4

0.80

23

2.6

31

4.3

PHAS-1

PKCα

0.52

9.6

0.7

9.6

2.8

Histone H1

PKCα

0.43

7.32

0.7

9.4

3.0

Discussion

Despite the existence of several different technologies to monitor phosphorylation reactions of kinases, the detection of protein substrate phosphorylation has been limited to antibody-based assays, radioactive assays or assays that measure ATP consumption rather than specific kinase activity. Antibody-based assays are restricted to available, purified antibodies, usually directed against phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues and may have low affinity and be specific to only a single kinase. Due to safety concerns over radioisotope handling as well as cost, drug screening efforts are rapidly moving toward non-radioactive and non-antibody-based assays. FP fulfills these criteria. However, since FP signal is correlated with changes in molecular rotation rates within the fluorescence life time and since only molecules smaller than approximately 20 kDa show significant rotation within this range most protein substrates are not directly measurable by FP [19]. A prompt fluorescence quench assay relies upon the binding of a phosphate coordinating metal ion to the phosphate group on a substrate, which is labeled with a dye [10]. Upon association of the metal ion, fluorescence is quenched. Similar to FRET assays, the rapid drop in signal with increasing distance between donor and acceptor molecules makes such assays unsuitable for the detection of protein phosphorylation, even if the proteins could be labeled with appropriate dyes [9]. The QTL Lightspeed™ protein assay is a novel non-radioactive and non-antibody-based assay that follows a simple mix and measure protocol for the quantitative detection of protein phosphorylation. Unmodified proteins can be used as substrates, thus allowing for the integrity of protein structure, which may be a requirement for successful recognition and phosphorylation by kinases. Our experiments utilized 0.5 μg MBP for phosphorylation by PKCα and IRAK4, thus moving the assay into the realm of HTS with regard to cost effectiveness. In this report, we describe the use of relatively small proteins MBP and PHAS-1 (18.9 kDa and 21 kDa respectively) and show feasibility for the larger protein Histone H1 (32 kDa) as well. Since our assay does not rely on site-specific antibodies, the phosphorylation of serine, threonine and tyrosine residues is possible.

Conclusion

We demonstrate that a modified version of our QTL Lightspeed™ platform provides a simple and robust assay for monitoring protein phosphorylation. The platform does not employ radioactive labels or antibodies, which makes it specific as well as time and cost-effective. We show that the assays for PKCα are suitable for drug compound screening by obtaining IC50 values of an ATP-analog which are very close to those reported in the literature for this compound. For IRAK4, reported values were not available. Thus, it is reasonable that our assay is also well-suited for the identification of inhibitors that are not ATP-site directed competitors. Further applications of the assay could be the detection of autophosphorylated kinases or other proteins that play a role in cell signaling. Finally, the QTL Lightspeed™ platform can be used to further identify novel protein substrates for specific kinases.

Methods

Fluorescent poly-phenylene ethyneylene was synthesized and coated onto microspheres as previously described [13, 14].

Bovine substrate MBP was purchased from Upstate (Charlottesville, VA). PHAS-1 was purchased from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA) and Histone H1 from Upstate. The phosphopeptide tracer was a 13 amino acid peptide, which was N-terminal labeled with a rhodamine derivative. The enzyme PKCα was purchased form Biomol and IRAK4 from Upstate. The inhibitor Staurosporine was from Sigma (St Louis, MO).

Kinase assays were performed using 384-well, white Optiplates (Perkin Elmer, Wellsley, MA) in a total volume of 15 μL. Protein Kinase Cα assays were performed in assay buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.4; 5 mM MgCl2; 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mg/ml 1-2-Dioleoyl-sn glycerol (Avanti, Alabaster, AL) and 0.02 mg/ml phosphatidylserine (Avanti) and 0.1% w/v NaN3) using 0.5 μg MBP as substrate for 1 hour at room temperature. The concentration of ATP (IDC, Livermore, CA) was 10 μM. IRAK4 phosphorylation was performed in assay buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM MnCl2; 0.1% BSA and 0.09% NaN3. The concentration of ATP was 50 μM for enzyme concentration curves and 10 μM for inhibition experiments. Following the enzymatic reaction, the phosphorylated protein was mixed with 15 μL of QTL Sensor for 10 minutes. Lastly, a rhodamine-labeled phosphorylated "tracer" peptide was added with a final concentration of 0.5 μM or 125 nM for detection of MBP or Histone H1 and PHAS-1 respectively for 30 minutes at ~25°C. The fluorescence of the reaction mixture was measured using a SpectraMax Gemini XS plate reader (Molecular Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) in well scan mode using excitation wavelength of 450 nm with a 475 nm cutoff filter and emission readout at 490 nm. Curve fitting was performed using GraphPad Prism® sigmoid dose-response (variable slope) software.

List of abbreviations

EC50

enzyme concentration at 50% of signal

ELISA: 

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

FP: 

Fluorescence polarization

FRET: 

fluorescence resonance energy transfer

IC50

Inhibitor concentration that produces 50% of signal.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Wensheng Xia, Komandoor Achyuthan and Harshini Mukundan for helpful discussions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
QTL Biosystems

References

  1. Drews J: Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science. 2000, 287: 1960-1964. 10.1126/science.287.5460.1960.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen P: Protein Kinases: the major drug targets of the twenty-first century?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002, 1: 309-315. 10.1038/nrd773.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook ND: Scintillation proximity assay: a versatile high-throughput screening technology. Drug Discov Today. 1996, 1: 287-294. 10.1016/1359-6446(96)10026-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Versteeg HH, Nijhuis E, van den Brink GR, Evertzen M, Pynaert GN, van Deventer SJ, Coffer PJ, Peppelenbosch MP: A new phosphosepcific cell-based ELISA for p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p38 MAPK, protein kinase B, and cAMP-response-element-binding-protein. Biochem J. 2000, 350: 717-722. 10.1042/0264-6021:3500717.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Koresawa M, Okabe T: High-throughput screening with quantitation of ATP consumption: a universal non-radioisotope, homogeneous assay for protein kinase. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2004, 2: 153-160. 10.1089/154065804323056495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Braunwalder AF, Yarwood DR, Sills MA, Lipson KE: Measurement of the protein tyrosine kinase activity of c-src using time-resolved fluorometry of europium chelates. Anal Biochem. 1996, 238: 159-164. 10.1006/abio.1996.0269.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Seethala R, Menzel R: A fluorescence polarization competition immunoassay for tyrosine kinases. Anal Biochem. 1998, 255: 257-262. 10.1006/abio.1997.2455.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sportsman JR, Gaudet EA, Boge A: Immobilized metal ion affinity-based fluorescence polarization (IMAP): advances in kinase screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2004, 2: 205-214. 10.1089/154065804323056549.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rodems SM, Hamman BD, Lin C, Zhao J, Shah S, Heidary D, Makings L, Stack JH, Pollok BA: A FRET-based assay platform for ultra-high density drug screening of protein kinases and phosphatases. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2002, 1: 9-19. 10.1089/154065802761001266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan AG, McCauley TJ, Stanaitis ML, Mathrubutham M, Millis SZ: Development and validation of a fluorescence technology for both primary and secondary screening of kinases that facilitates compound selectivity and site-specific inhibitor determination. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2004, 2: 171-181. 10.1089/154065804323056512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S: The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002, 298: 1912-1934. 10.1126/science.1075762.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Copeland R: Mechanistic Considerations in high-throughput screening. Anal Biochem. 2003, 320: 1-12. 10.1016/S0003-2697(03)00346-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Xia W, Rininsland F, Wittenburg SK, Shi X, Achyuthan KE, McBranch DW, Whitten DG: Applications of fluorescent polymer superquenching to high throughput screening assays for protein kinases. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2004, 2: 183-192. 10.1089/154065804323056521.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rininsland F, Xia W, Shi X, Wittenburg SK, Achyuthan KE, McBranch DW, Whitten DG: Metal ion mediated polymer superquenching for highly sensitive detection of protein kinase and phosphatase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 15295-15300. 10.1073/pnas.0406832101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen L, McBranch DW, Wang HL, Helgeson R, Wudl F, Whitten DG: Highly sensitive biological and chemical sensors based on reversible fluorescence quenching in a conjugated polymer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 12287-12292. 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12287.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones RM, Lu L, Helgeson R, Bergstedt TS, McBranch DW, Whitten DG: Building highly sensitive dye assemblies for biosensing from molecular building blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 14769-14772. 10.1073/pnas.251555298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hidaka H, Watanabe M, Kobayashi R: Properties and use of H-series compounds as protein kinase inhibitors. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 201: 328-339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang JH, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR: A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J Biomol Screen. 1999, 4: 67-73. 10.1177/108705719900400206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Owicki JC: Fluorescence polarization and anisotropy in high throughput screening:perspectives and primer. J Biomol Screen. 2000, 5: 297-306. 10.1177/108705710000500501.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rininsland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement