Open Access

Assessing the bioconfinement potential of a Nicotianahybrid platform for use in plant molecular farming applications

  • J Hollis Rice1,
  • Richard E Mundell2,
  • Reginald J Millwood1,
  • Orlando D Chambers2,
  • C Neal StewartJr1Email author and
  • H Maelor Davies3
BMC Biotechnology201313:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-63

Received: 21 March 2013

Accepted: 1 August 2013

Published: 6 August 2013

Abstract

Background

The introduction of pharmaceutical traits in tobacco for commercial production could benefit from the utilization of a transgene bioconfinement system. It has been observed that interspecific F1Nicotiana hybrids (Nicotiana tabacum × Nicotiana glauca) are sterile and thus proposed that hybrids could be suitable bioconfined hosts for biomanufacturing. We genetically tagged hybrids with green fluorescent protein (GFP), which was used as a visual marker to enable gene flow tracking and quantification for field and greenhouse studies. GFP was used as a useful proxy for pharmaceutical transgenes.

Results

Analysis of DNA content revealed significant genomic downsizing of the hybrid relative to that of N. tabacum. Hybrid pollen was capable of germination in vitro, albeit with a very low frequency and with significant differences between plants. In two field experiments, one each in Tennessee and Kentucky, we detected outcrossing at only one location (Tennessee) at 1.4%. Additionally, from 50 hybrid plants at each field site, formation of 84 and 16 seed was observed, respectively. Similar conclusions about hybrid fertility were drawn from greenhouse crosses. In terms of above-ground biomass, the hybrid yield was not significantly different than that of N. tabacum in the field.

Conclusion

N. tabacum × N. glauca hybrids show potential to contribute to a bioconfinement- and biomanufacturing host system. Hybrids exhibit extremely low fertility with no difference of green biomass yields relative to N. tabacum. In addition, hybrids are morphologically distinguishable from tobacco allowing for identity preservation. This hybrid system for biomanufacturing would optimally be used where N. glauca is not present and in physical isolation of N. tabacum production to provide total bioconfinement.

Keywords

Gene flow Male-sterility Pharming Bioconfinement Nicotiana Green fluorescent protein (GFP) Plant-made-pharmaceuticals (PMPs)

Background

Development of plants as biofactories has progressed since the advent of biotechnology and has rendered the concept of plant molecular farming into existence. Transgene-expression technologies that enable plants to produce large quantities of non-native proteins have useful properties in industrial or pharmaceutical applications, such as production of antibodies, vaccines, and enzymes [1, 2]. These technologies have formed the basis of several prospective commercial strategies for biomanufacturing these materials, with advantages of superior economics and ease of scale-up relative to the commonly used microbial and mammalian cell-based fermentation systems [3, 4]. Recently the first official clinical-use approval was made for transgenic carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus) cells expressing a human gene for treatment of Gaucher’s disease [5]. This development could be a stepping-stone to using field-grown plants for protein biomanufacturing. Open-field production renders low facilities costs and high scalability, but raises questions of field-based risks. The choice of production platforms (e.g. plant species) is a crucial decision; use of major commodities for plant-made pharmaceuticals (PMP) could warrant extra precaution [6]. Fortunately, there are alternative, non-food species in which the gene-expression technologies are effective. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) has been extensively explored as a PMP host [5, 7]. However, the possibility of transgene flow to commercial tobacco is a concern. As transgenic varieties of tobacco are not used in any traditional tobacco production, accidental co-mingling of seed or genetic outcrossing, which is low in tobacco (typically less than 5%; [8]), could cause regulatory, legal, or possibly health issues.

There have been several documented examples of unintended gene flow from transgenic plants. In creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.), for example, transgene escape to conspecific hosts via pollen and seed can occur over tens of kilometers [9]. ProdiGene, Inc., a former PMP company, was fined by regulatory authorities and was compelled to conduct an expensive clean-up effort for maize PMP volunteers that were detected in a former field site intermingled with soybeans [10]. Such incidents must be avoided if PMPs are to become a commercial reality. There are many possible solutions to the challenge of providing adequate transgene confinement [11]. Harvesting prior to flowering, or manual flower removal might seem obvious and attractive solutions, as this would simultaneously obviate gene flow to other plants via outcrossing and seed formation from the transgenic crop itself. However, the challenge of preventing any flowers from forming in large production acreage necessitates a more reliable system, e.g., bioconfinement.

In this regard, cultivated tobacco and other species in the Nicotiana genus provide some potentially useful attributes. Many uncultivated Nicotiana species, such as N. glauca used in this study, produce biomass yields required for economical leaf-based biomanufacturing. Morphologically, F1 hybrids between N. tabacum and N. glauca are readily distinguishable from cultivated tobacco, have high biomass, and have been reported to be sexually sterile [1215]. Our own preliminary results from reciprocal crosses between the F1 hybrid and its parent species, N. tabacum and N. glauca, indicated F1s were sterile; however when N. glauca was the sire, there was low fertility (data not shown). Collectively, these properties lead us to consider interspecific Nicotiana hybrids as a potential PMP production platform. PMP constructs could be introduced into the N. tabacum and N. glauca parents using existing methods. Hybrid seed for field production would then be generated by hybridizing N. tabacum with N. glauca, an efficient process, as seed yields per plant are very high in these species. Use of these hybrids would provide bioconfinement attributes of (1) production of little or no viable pollen that could transfer transgenes to tobacco production fields, and (2) production of little or no viable seed from the PMP field owing to the lack of viable pollen.

However, the constraints and limitations of F1 sterility and production of this system need further research using transgenes to place bioconfinement in the context of biosafety regulations in relevant field settings. A complicating factor is that no regulatory agency has declared specifications for any commercial crop/transgene with regards to field-level gene flow or bioconfinement, although thresholds for presence of transgenic material in conventional food or feed exist. That said, it is safe to assume that bioconfinement should be very high to be effective. Therefore, we set out to assay interspecific hybrid plant pollination of hybrid to tobacco as well as the reciprocal cross. To create a suitable N. tabacum ♀ × N. glauca ♂ hybrid line for these experiments, we transformed both parents with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker gene as a proxy for a PMP, providing a convenient way of monitoring transgene flow. DNA content and pollen germination were measured to assess possible differences among multiple hybrid lines and parents. The fertility of the hybrid was characterized by a field gene flow study and by manual crosses in a greenhouse. The productivity of the hybrid, in terms of aboveground green biomass was also determined.

Methods

Plants

A summary of plant genotypes used in our studies is listed in Table 1. N. glauca was obtained from the US National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) (plant introduction 307908, accession TW55 from Peru). The following N. tabacum lines were obtained from the Kentucky Tobacco Seed Improvement Association, Inc. in Lexington, KY, USA (38°8’N, 84°29’W): N. tabacum ‘TN 90’ was from foundation seed lot # 86-02-K-4A. N. tabacum ‘MS TN 90’ is a male sterile variety of TN 90 from seed lot # 86-03-KLC-15. N. tabacum ‘SN 2108’ is a “dark type” tobacco that is morphologically distinct from the TN 90 cultivar was from seed lot KT D4. Several F1 hybrids were used in our studies. The term ‘hybrid GFP’ is used to denote those F1s containing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker gene. The F1 amphihaploid hybrids we produced were the product of unidirectional fertilization of N. tabacum with N. glauca pollen.
Table 1

Plant genotypes used in the studies, including parentage, hybrid and transgene status

Genotype designation

Species or F1hybrid

Transgenic status

Marker gene

Maternal parent

Paternal parent

TN 90 GFP

Nicotiana tabacum

Transgenic

GFP

Nicotiana tabacum

Nicotiana tabacum

glauca GFP

Nicotiana glauca

Transgenic

GFP

Nicotiana glauca

Nicotiana glauca

hybrid GFP

Hybrid

Transgenic

GFP

TN 90 GFP

Glauca GFP

MS TN 90

Nicotiana tabacum

Non-transgenic

N/A

Nicotiana tabacum

Nicotiana tabacum

SN 2108

Nicotiana tabacum

Non-transgenic

N/A

Nicotiana tabacum

Nicotiana tabacum

HYB BC1F1

Hybrid

Transgenic

GFP

Hybrid GFP

SN 2108

MS BC1F1

Hybrid

Transgenic

GFP

MS TN 90

Hybrid GFP

NT-TN 90

Nicotiana tabacum

Non-transgenic

N/A

Nicotiana tabacum

Nicotiana tabacum

NT- glauca

Nicotiana glauca

Non-transgenic

N/A

Nicotiana glauca

Nicotiana glauca

NT- hybrid

Hybrid

Non-transgenic

N/A

Nicotiana tabacum

Nicotiana glauca

Not all genotypes were used in every experiment.

Plant transformation

N. tabacum ‘TN 90’ and N. glauca were transformed with the previously described vector, pBIN mGFP5-ER, which contains the mGFP5-ER gene under the control of the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter and an nptII kanamycin resistance gene [16]. mGFP5-ER, a GFP variant, emits green light (λmax = 509 nm) when excited by wavelengths of either ultraviolet (UV) (395 nm) or blue (465 nm) light, which is bright enough to be readily observed under UV excitation and quantifiable with appropriate instrumentation [17, 18].

Plants were transformed via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation [19]. Leaf explants were prepared by sterilizing young leaves with a mixture of 10% commercial bleach and 0.01% Tween 20, washed with sterile water, then excised into 6 mm2 segments. Explants were allowed to soak in a suspension of liquid MS salts containing B5 vitamin (DBI medium) and A. tumefaciens strain GV3850 harboring the constructs of interest for 30 minutes. Transformed explants were allowed to co-cultivate on solid DBI medium for 48 h prior to transfer to DBI containing Timentin® (400 mg/L) and kanamycin (200 mg/L). Shoots arising from callus were transferred to MS medium containing kanamycin (200 mg/L) for root development [20]. Shoot cultures were grown at 24°C under 16/8 h light/dark periods until rooting occurred. Shoots were then transferred to potting media and acclimated for two weeks. GFP-expressing plants were selected visually with a hand-held longwave UV light (UVP model B-100AP 100 W: 365 nm) as previously described [18]. For further confirmation of the presence of mGFP5-ER, genomic DNA was extracted [21] from leaf tissue, and PCR was performed according to Hudson et al. to amplify the full mGFP5-ER sequence [22].

T0 plants were grown to maturity in 4 L pots in a greenhouse under 16/8 h light/dark periods and corresponding 27°/20°C thermoperiods. Upon flowering, plants were bagged with breathable mesh pollination bags (DelStar Technologies, Inc., Middleton, DE, USA) and manually shaken to promote pollination. T1 seeds were collected at maturity and this process was repeated to obtain T2 generation seeds. Progeny from selfed T0 transgenic events were screened for antibiotic resistance and GFP fluorescence using published methods [23] to confirm transgene integration into hosts.

GFP Nicotianahybrid production

Our goal was to produce a Nicotiana hybrid with sufficient copies of mGFP5-ER for tracking purposes, whereby a copy of the mGFP5-ER transgene should be present in the genome of each pollen grain. Transformed parent lines were bred to homozygosity for mGFP5-ER to the T2 generation. Plants were screened for GFP using a handheld UV light to select the brightest GFP-expressing seedlings. GFP expression was then measured by a spectrofluorometer (Fluorolog®-3 HORIBA Jobin Yvon, Edison, NJ, USA) [18, 23] and analyzed with software (FluorEssence™ Version 2.5.2.0.HORIBA Jobin Yvon, Edison, NJ, USA) to measure GFP fluorescence. Two strategies were employed to assure homozygosity of each T2 line. First, lines were germinated in two flats each and screened with the handheld UV light to determine zygosity of each T2 line (using ratios of GFP to non-GFP plants) and inheritance of antibiotic resistance traits among T2 lines germination on MS medium containing kanamycin (200 mg/L). Selected T2 homozygous lines were designated as “TN 90 GFP” or “glauca GFP” and grown to maturity. These plants were then crossed (TN 90 GFP ♀ × glauca GFP ♂), to produce the sterile hybrid designated as “hybrid GFP” (see Table 1).

Estimation of nuclear DNA content

N. tabacum has twice as many chromosomes as N. glauca (2n = 48 vs 2n = 24), resulting in low likelihood of meiotic chromosome pairing in the F1 interspecific hybrid. The absolute DNA content of five hybrid GFP lines and each non-transgenic parental line was estimated by flow cytometry with five replicates each. Plant tissue samples were processed as previously described by Galbraith [24] and analyzed using an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (Accuri Cytometers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The known genome size of Solanum lycopersicum ‘Roma’, 2C = 1.96 pg [25] was used as an internal standard for estimating DNA content in N. tabacum (2C = 9.67), N. glauca (2C = 6.91), and the Nicotiana hybrid [26].

Pollen germination

In order to determine male fertility pollen germination rates of five hybrid GFP lines, wild-type N. tabacum (NT-TN 90), and wild-type N. glauca (NT-glauca) were compared with five replicates of each. Pollen grains were collected and germinated as previously described [27, 28]. Pollen was placed on a microscope slide for observation with an Olympus BX 51 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) at 100× magnification. A randomly sampled field of view was captured by a digital camera (Olympus Q Color 3) and imaging system. Between 722 and 993 pollen grains were counted for each hybrid line, 1678 grains were counted for non-transgenic (NT)-TN 90 and 1262 grains were counted for NT-glauca. Germination percentage was calculated by dividing the number of germinated pollen grains by the total number of observed pollen grains.

Field outcrossing

Natural outcrossing rates of fluorescently tagged hybrids were estimated in two field experiments conducted at Versailles, Kentucky, USA (38.075784, -84.740575) (KY) and Knoxville, Tennessee, USA (35.891769, -83.959786) (TN). A modified Nelder wheel design (Figure 1) [29] covered approximately 0.931 hectares and contained three plant types. GFP-tagged hybrids and non-transgenic SN 2108 plants were used as pollen donors in the center of the plot, and located along the spokes of the Nelder wheel MS TN 90 plants were used as pollen recipients (Figure 1). The pollen source plot measured approximately 15 m in diameter and contained 3 concentric circles consisting of 50 plants each of alternating hybrid GFP and SN 2108 spaced approximately 1 m apart; a honeybee hive was located at the center of the experiment to ensure pollinator presence. Honeybees were observed on plot flowers. Surrounding this central plot were sixteen blocks of five MS TN 90 plants, each used to detect outcrossing at 9, 23, 38, and 54 m from the center plot in each cardinal direction. Each block of MS TN 90 plants were 22.5° relative to the adjacent block with respect to the center plot in contrast to Nelder’s design where the outer plots are arranged in a linear fashion. This modification was made to take advantage of honeybee flight patterns [30], for flight to and from the center patch. Blocks of MS TN 90 plants and hybrid GFP flowers were monitored throughout the season for formation of pods, which were promptly collected at maturity. SN 2108 plants were used solely as a pollen source and seed set was not of interest because of high self-fertilization rates.
Figure 1

Design of field gene flow experiment. A modified Nelder wheel design was used evaluate the gene flow of hybrid GFP plants. Three plant types were used in the experiment: male sterile N. tabacum ‘MS TN 90’ were pollen ‘receptor’ plants, hybrid GFP was fluorescently tagged to enable gene flow tracking, and N. tabacum type SN 2108 was used as a pollen donor to assure pollen flow was occurring in the field by seed set on MS TN 90 and to test for female sterility of the hybrid GFP plants. A center pollen source patch contained 50 alternating hybrid GFP and fertile SN 2108 plants, spaced approximately 1 m apart. Sixteen 1 m2 blocks of male sterile MS TN 90 pollen receptor plants were placed at 9, 23, 38, and 54 m distances from the center and were used to detect pollen via seed formation. Each MS TN 90 plot was 22.5° relative to the adjacent plot as viewed from the center. A honeybee hive was placed at the center of the field site to vector pollen.

Seed pods were collected at maturity continuously throughout the growing season from both MS TN 90 and hybrid GFP plants and subsequently dried. In Kentucky seed pods were dried after being placed into coin envelopes which were placed into a wooden container with a perforated bottom and shelves. Room temperature air was continuously blown into the bottom of the container until pods were dry. In Tennessee, seeds pods were placed into envelopes and stored in a drying oven at 28°C for 48 hr. After drying, seeds were germinated on filter paper moistened with 0.2% KNO3 at alternating 25°C 16 h light: 20°C 8 h dark in accordance with the International Seed Testing Association standards [31]. After three weeks 100 μM GA 4 + 7 was applied to germinate any remaining seed. Seedlings were screened with a handheld UV light to detect GFP-expressing progeny, which were transplanted into potting media and analyzed with a spectrofluorometer as previously described.

Pollen tube growth

There could be competition between hybrid GFP and SN 2108 pollen for pollination of MS TN 90 plants in the field. Therefore, pollen tube growth rates were compared. Two plants per line were used, with three replicates per plant measured for 3 d. Pollen was germinated as described above, except 15 μl of BK + medium and pollen was taken every 15 min for 5 h to perform a time-series analysis. Micrographs of pollen tubes were captured and tube lengths were measured against a gridlines on a Hausser Scientific brightline hemacytometer (Horsham, PA, USA). A total of 8750 pollen grains were observed from SN 2108 plants and 7,524 grains were observed from hybrid GFP.

Manual crosses

Manual crosses were conducted in a greenhouse in Lexington, KY, and were performed to mirror the possible crosses expected in the field experiment. To determine the outcrossing capability of the hybrid, hybrid GFP plants were crossed with MS TN 90. To evaluate the seed setting capacity of the hybrid, SN 2108, the pollen source plant type used in the field experiment were crossed to hybrid GFP plants. Hybrid GFP plants were also intercrossed to determine any transgene event reproduction variability. In addition, both fertile plants, SN 2108 and MS TN 90, were crossed as controls. Pollen-recipient flowers were emasculated prior to crossing. A total of 96 crosses were performed for (hybrid GFP ♀ × SN 2108 ♂) crosses and 95 crosses were performed for (MS TN 90 ♀ × hybrid GFP ♂). Ten crosses were performed between a pair of MS TN 90 ♀ × SN 2108 ♂ plants and also for the pair of crossed hybrid GFP plants. Seeds derived from crosses containing GFP-tagged plants were germinated, transplanted to potting mix, and analyzed with a spectrofluorometer as previously described.

Aboveground biomass

Field study

Vegetative biomass of NT-TN 90 and NT-hybrid plants were measured. The study employed a complete randomized block design with three replications. Seeds were germinated in float trays and transplanted at a density of approximately 12,000 plants/hectare. Plots consisted of four 6 m rows containing 80 plants. Drip irrigation was employed for supplemental watering. Harvesting occurred during the budding stage by trimming rows to 4.6 m for standardization and measuring all green biomass above the 30 cm mark above the soil line. Subsequent harvests occurred every 28 to 35 days for a total of three harvests and the study was repeated in two consecutive years.

Greenhouse study

To determine the productivity of hybrid GFP relative to the parent lines NT-hybrids, five replicate plants from hybrid GFP, glauca GFP, TN 90 GFP, and NT-hybrid lines were grown. A completely randomized design was used to determine fresh biomass productivity. For each replicate, approximately 10 seedlings were germinated in a 4 L pot in a greenhouse, culled down to one plant 2 weeks post-germination and transplanted to a 12 L pot 2 months post-germination. Plants were grown under a 16/8 h light/dark periods and corresponding 27°/20°C thermoperiods and spaced at 1 m centers. Plant productivity was analyzed by measuring fresh weight harvested at the budding stage 30 cm above the soil line. Plants were allowed to re-grow to the budding stage for two measurements.

Statistical analysis

All analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression, contingency table analyses, and chi-squared tests were performed using SAS (Version 9.3 SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA) with a significance level of p < 0.05. Proc mixed was used for all ANOVA calculations. The least significant difference was used for mean separations if ANOVA results were found to be statistically significant. Log and rank transformations and were used when data did not meet the assumptions of a normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test [32] or equal variance by the Levene test [33].

Results

Transformation and characterization of parental lines and hybrids

Multiple transgenic events from N. tabacum ‘TN 90’ and N. glauca were generated. T1 plants that highly expressed GFP and were selected and self-pollinated. Homozygosity of T2 lines was confirmed by progeny analysis by antibiotic screening on media and GFP expression. The homozygous T2N. tabacum and N. glauca lines were crossed to produce hybrid GFP lines, where GFP was visible in the stems and leaves of the plants.

To assess the effectiveness of the sterile hybrid system as a bioconfinement platform, it was important to characterize hybrid-line variation in DNA content and male fertility. The absolute DNA content of the five hybrid GFP lines did not differ significantly from each other or the paternal line N. glauca, but differed from the maternal line N. tabacum (p = 0.010) (Figure 2A). Although pollen germination differed across hybrid and parent lines (p < 0.001), only one hybrid line differed from the other four with a higher percentage of germination (Figure 2B). Regression analysis revealed no association between pollen germination and DNA content at p = 0.05.
Figure 2

DNA content and pollen germination analysis. (A) DNA content was estimated by flow cytometry and (B) pollen viability was estimated by pollen germination. Hybrid GFP-plant lines: H1. H2, H3, H4, and H5 and non-transgenic parent lines NT-glauca (NG) and NT-TN 90 (NT) n = 5. Mean separation is by Fishers LSD and bars marked by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars are the standard error of the means.

Field outcrossing experiments

Preliminary hand-crosses resulted in extremely low fertility of the interspecific hybrid plants, which prompted us to assay natural outcrossing in the field. We observed no aberrations of pod formation and seed-set on the MS TN 90 plants in each field experiment. No GFP-positive seedlings were found after germination of 7,340 MS TN 90 seeds from the KY field site, however, one single GFP positive seedling (collected from a distance of 9 m from the field center) was found from 74 germinated seeds from the TN field site (a 1.4% outcrossing rate) (Table 2). The sole survivor died several weeks after germination. In the testing of our initial hypothesis that there would be no hybrid GFP outcrossing, a Pearson’s chi squared test indicated a nonsignificant deviation from the null hypothesis (p < 0.05) with p = 1.0 and p = 0.9 for KY and TN field sites, respectively. Whereas pollen movement occurred in these fields there was nearly no transgene ‘outflow’ from the hybrids.
Table 2

Summary of seed collection, germination, and analysis from hybrid GFP and MS TN 90 plant at the Kentucky and Tennessee field sites

Site

Kentucky

Tennessee

Plant

Hybrid GFP

MS TN 90

Hybrid GFP

MS TN 90

Total pods collected

73

155

263

118

Blocks setting seeda

N/A

15

N/A

9

Plants setting seed

5

N/A

11

N/A

Seeds collected

16

11170

84

5968

Seeds germinated

9

7340

38

74

Total surviving seedlings

5

7340

32

73

GFP positive seedlingsb

4

0

31

1

GFP negative seedlingsb

1

7340

1

74

Surviving GFP positive seedlings confirmed with spectrofluorometer

4

0

31

0

a N. tabacum ‘MS TN 90’ plants were planted and harvested in blocks of five plants.

bPresence of green fluorescent protein was confirmed visually with a handheld UV light.

All pods formed on the hybrid GFP plants were examined; only 16 seeds were derived from 5 plants at the KY site and 84 seeds formed from 11 plants at the TN field site. A total of 47 of these seeds from both sites germinated, yielding 37 seedlings and hence mature plants. Thirty-five seedlings were GFP-positive, both by observation under UV light and by spectrofluorometric analysis (Table 3). These observations suggest that while seeds containing the transgene can be formed on the hybrids in an open-pollination environment, the total seed-set on these plants is very small in comparison with that of conventional N. tabacum. Moreover, none of the progeny grown from the very limited hybrid GFP seed production in the field experiment produced any seed when self-pollination was attempted.
Table 3

Results of crosses made in the greenhouse to examine the sexual compatibility of hybrid GFP plants and the fertility of their progeny

Genotypesa

Plants crossedb

Total crossesc

Crosses resulting in seed production

Total seed count

Seeds that germinated

Surviving plants

(A) F1 crosses

(hybrid GFP × SN 2108)d

12:12

95

7

12

5

3

(MS TN 90 × hybrid GFP)e

12:12

96

9

445

2

2

(hybrid GFP × hybrid GFP)

1:1

10

0

0

0

0

(B) Backcrosses

(MS TN 90 × HYB BC1F1)

2:1

60

0

0

0

0

(MS BC1F1 × NT-glauca)

1:1

20

2

128

74

74

(MS BC1F1 × NT-TN 90)

1:1

20

0

0

0

0

(MS BC1F1 × hybrid GFP)

1:1

20

0

0

0

0

aCrosses listed by (female ♀ × male ♂).

bRefers to numbers of each plant used in crosses with respect to the plant order in the cross column.

cA ‘cross’ is constituted by a pollen transfer from one plant to the flower of another plant.

dProgeny of this cross formed the individuals named HYB BC1F1.

eProgeny of this cross formed the individuals named MS BC1F1.

Progeny generated from the initial hybrid GFP crosses were used in a subsequent set of crosses to test sexual compatibility of potential volunteers with other Nicotianas. The crosses shown in the top-most rows each for (A) F1 crosses and (B) Backcrosses, produced progeny that were subsequently used for additional crosses. See Table 1 for plant nomenclature.

Pollen tube growth: pollen competition experiment

To estimate the degree of competition from hybrid GFP and SN 2108 to pollinate MS TN 90 plants in the field experiments, pollen tube growth was measured. Simple linear regression of the SN 2108 pollen samples that germinated revealed that pollen tube length and time was positively correlated (R2 = 0.203) with an average growth rate of 0.043 ± 0.005 mm per 15 minutes. For hybrid GFP plants, linear- or polynomial regression models did not reveal any association of pollen tube length and time (p = 0.206), thus pollen competition might have occurred between plant types.

Manual crosses

Crosses were performed under greenhouse conditions among the transgenic hybrid GFP lines, MS TN 90, and SN 2108 (Table 3). We observed robust seed production from the MS TN 90 by SN 2108 cross (data not shown). However, the pollination of hybrid GFP plants by SN2108 resulted in few seeds from 7 of 96 crosses (Table 3). Five of these seeds germinated (71% viability) but only 3 plants survived to maturity. Testing the outcrossing potential of the hybrid GFP to MS TN 90 resulted in seed from 9 out of 96 crosses. Viability of this seed was extremely low (< 0.7%); just 3 out of 445 seeds germinated (Table 3), and one plant died shortly after germination. Attempted crosses between two hybrid GFP plants resulted in no seed.

Subsequently, crosses were performed to determine fertility of the progeny derived from the hybrid GFP ♀ × SN 2108 ♂ cross, designated as HYB BC1F1 and the MS TN 90 ♀ × hybrid GFP ♂ cross, designated as MS BC1F1 (Table 3). This germplasm, in effect, simulates the possible fates of volunteer plant populations as a result of comingling of genetic material from a hybrid GFP field and nearby Nicotianas. HYB BC1F1 pollen was crossed to MS TN 90 plants to test if a volunteer produced from seed set on hybrid F1 plants could pollinate a neighboring N. tabacum field; none of the 60 crosses set any seed. MS BC1F1 plants, the result of the few successful hybrid GFP outcrossing to MS TN 90, were pollinated with non-transgenic N. glauca and TN 90 pollen, and hybrid GFP pollen. Only the MS BC1F1 ♀ × NT-glauca crosses produced any seed, confirming earlier findings that N. glauca can successfully pollinate hybrids. No other crosses produced seed.

These results suggest that the small amount of viable seed formation that could occur in field production of the hybrids via pollen introduced from within (hybrid plants) or outside that field (conventional tobacco) would not result in the persistence of transgenic plants in that field beyond one generation. The only exception to this limited persistence would be if N. glauca plants grew inside or adjacent to a hybrid field site.

Above-ground biomass

For interspecific hybrid Nicotianas to have potential as production-host plants in biomanufacturing they should produce high biomass; e.g., comparable to commercial tobacco. There were not significant differences of biomass between hybrids and TN 90 in the field experiment (p = 0.738; Figure 3A). There were biomass differences among plant types in the greenhouse study (Figure 3B). We conclude that interspecific hybrid tobacco performed comparably to N. tabacum in biomass.
Figure 3

Fresh aboveground biomass productivity. (A) Productivity was measured for nontransgenic hybrid plants and nontransgenic TN 90 plants in a field experiment over two years with three measurements per year. (B) A greenhouse study was conducted during one year with two measurements of the hybrid GFP line, the transgenic parental lines of the aforementioned hybrid, and a nontransgenic hybrid line. Mean separation is by Fishers LSD and bars marked by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars are the standard error of the means.

Discussion

Tobacco has several qualities that make it suitable for use as a production platform for biomanufacturing. It is easily transformable to achieve a high content of soluble heterologous protein, and accommodates a range of alternative gene-expression systems including viral transfection, transient expression via Agrobacterium vectors, and stable nuclear and chloroplast transformation methods [34]. The tobacco system is very productive; the above-ground portion of the plants can be harvested several times per growing season, producing up to 25 tonnes ha-1 of biomass [35]. In addition, tobacco has a track record of experimental use as a bioreactor for producing vaccines, antibodies, and cytokines [3638], and its high biomass yields and prolific production of seed suggest efficiency and flexibility of scale-up. Tobacco is being used in biomanufacturing in the private sector currently. Planet Biotechnology has a dental caries product in Phase II clinical trials and Medicago, Inc. has an influenza vaccine in Phase I clinical trials. The interspecific hybrid (N. tabacum ♀ × N. glauca ♂) has been described as an effective production platform for an animal vaccine [36]. The ‘sterility’ of this hybrid has been cited as a distinct benefit for production in the environment over tobacco [36] contributing to the desired goal of complete bioconfinement of heterologous pharmaceutical genes and proteins in biomanufacturing applications, but until now this attribute has not been evaluated in detail.

Previous studies on the fertility of the Nicotiana interspecific F1 hybrids concluded that they were infertile [36]; Trojak-Goluch and Berbec described the F1 amphihaploids resulting from pollinating N. tabacum with N. glauca as “completely self- and cross-sterile” [12, 14, 36]. Al-Ahmad et al. observed their N. sylvestris × N. tabacum hybrids were incapable of self-pollination or of successfully generating any progeny when backcrossed to the female parent N. sylvestris[15]. The principal difference between our findings and those earlier studies is our observation of occasional, albeit very minimal, fertility of N. tabacum ♀ × N. glauca ♂ hybrid plants, both in the greenhouse and in the field. Similarly the germination rate of pollen formed on different (transgenic) hybrid individuals was very low but measurable and variable (Figure 2B), contrasting with the observation from Ling et. al. that the pollen from transgenic N. tabacum ♀ × N. glauca ♂ hybrids was non-viable [36]. This disparity is important in relation to the goal of obtaining optimum bioconfinement, as it cautions that the ‘sterility’ trait may not be sufficiently predictable for this hybrid host to be the sole strategy employed.

Differences in residual fertility among hybrid plants may have resulted from variation among transgenic events following fusion of the gametes owing to amphiploidy effects. Trojak-Goluch and Berbec concluded that meiosis in pollen mother cells was mostly asynaptic, based on the number of univalent chromosomes, which varied from cell to cell during metaphase I; they also noted that chromatid bridges, lagging chromosomes and a lack of one of the meiotic divisions were common observations during anaphase and telophase I [12]. Hence we were interested in variation of total DNA content among types, especially among hybrids. The absolute DNA content of NT-TN 90 was similar to previously reported values for N. tabacum[26, 39] (Figure 2A). Also, our estimations for N. glauca reflected a wide range of previously reported 2C values [26, 40]; Figure 2A). The additive 2C value of the parental lines of the hybrid was 18.72 pg, but the average 2C value of hybrid GFP ranged from 8.92 pg to 9.16 pg among five lines, indicating a substantial genome downsizing of 50% (Figure 2A). The DNA content of these hybrid GFP plants, which are amphiploid/tetraploid (3n = 2× = 36) [14], were not significantly different from that of NT-glauca (2n = 2× = 24). Polyploids within the genus Nicotiana have been reported to exhibit increased DNA content or to show additivity in DNA content relative to the sum of the diploid parents’ values, and genome downsizing is a common occurrence in many plant species [41]. One might be concerned that downsizing during the hybridization process could compromise subsequent transgene expression levels. However, we consistently observed that F1 hybrid GFP, which was produced from parent lines homozygous for mGFP5-ER, produced GFP-expressing progeny in subsequent crosses, and therefore apparently retained multiple copies of the mGFP5-ER transgene.

Even with the extremely limited fertility that we observed, the interspecific hybrid strategy does represent a bioconfinement improvement over expressing genes in N. tabacum in the context of bioconfinement. The manual plant crosses showed low production of viable seeds: from N. tabacum type SN 2108 to the hybrid, and from hybrid to N. tabacum MS TN 90 (Table 3). This finding was confirmed in the field setting, as evidence of GFP presence in the N. tabacum MS TN 90 progeny was found among thousands of seeds (Table 2). In contrast, a very small number of viable seeds were set on the hybrids in the field (Table 2). However, we note that the Tennessee field study data are very limited owing to very low seed germination; we cannot explain this finding.

The use of the interspecific hybrid host for biomanufacturing should not be considered to be a failsafe bioconfinement solution. A male-sterility trait could be employed in N. tabacum to improve bioconfinement. Although, cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) sometimes suffers from reversion of the phenotype [42, 43], CMS might also be useful for bioconfinement. However, if the hybrid is used in isolation from tobacco production fields (say, 10 km), AOSCA seed production regulations state only 0.40 km of isolation of different fertile tobacco cultivars the combination of partial bioconfinement in the hybrid system and physical isolation could be sufficient to mitigate risks.

Of the crosses that were attempted, the most productive was the pollination of the hybrid by N. glauca (data not shown). N. glauca is currently present in twelve U.S. states [44], including regions in which tobacco agriculture occurs (e.g. Ohio). A regulatory process examining the hybrid for use in outdoor production of recombinant proteins would need to evaluate wild N. glauca distribution and proximity to PMP-production fields. However, the pollination of N. glauca by the hybrid was consistently unsuccessful in our hands (data not shown), which is encouraging in relation to concerns about transgene transfer to the wild species in the environment.

Conclusions

The extremely low fertility of interspecific Nicotiana hybrid plants could contribute to an effectively bioconfined biomanufacturing platform, which would also likely require physical isolation from commercial tobacco production as well as from wild N. glauca. The hybrid progeny obtained from pollinating N. tabacum using the uncultivated species N. glauca represent a good candidate for a bioproduction host since it has extremely low fertility and sufficient above-ground biomass in the field.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Derek Green, Justin McDuffie, Ben Wolfe, Jonathan Branson, Sam Plank, James O’Daniel, Garrett Payne, Robin Ramsay and Doug Giles for assistance in planting, field maintenance and data collection. We would like to thank the staff of East Tennessee Research and Education Center in Knoxville and the Animal Research Center in Versailles, Kentucky for facilities and technical support. Additionally, we thank Dr. John Skinner, Michael Wilson, and Paul Rhoads for providing a beehive and Blake Joyce, Dr. Shigetoshi Eda, and Sujata Agarwal for assistance with flow cytometry. We also wish to thank Charleson Poovaiah and Christy Rose for assistance in plant transformation experiments and Dr. Arnold Saxton for providing SAS macros and advice. This study was funded by the NIFA Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant Program and all research was conducted in compliance of USDA-APHIS-BRS regulations.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee
(2)
Kentucky Tobacco Research & Development Center, University of Kentucky
(3)
Department of Plant & Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky

References

  1. Ma JK-C, Drake PMW, Christou P: The production of recombinant pharmaceutical proteins in plants. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4: 794-805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. He Y, Ning T, Xie T, Qiu Q, Zhang L, Sun Y, Jiang D, Fu K, Yin F, Zhang W: Large-scale production of functional human serum albumin from transgenic rice seeds. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 19078-19083. 10.1073/pnas.1109736108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ma JK-C, Chikwamba R, Sparrow P, Fischer R, Mahoney R, Twyman RM: Plant-derived pharmaceuticals–the road forward. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10: 580-585. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.10.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lienard D, Sourrouille C, Gomord V, Faye L: Pharming and transgenic plants. Biotechnol Annual Rev. 2007, 13: 115-147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Maxmen A: Drug-making plant blooms. Nature. 2012, 485: 160-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Stewart CN: Pharming in crop commodities. Nat Biotechnol. 2008, 26: 1222-1223. 10.1038/nbt1108-1222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sparrow PAC, Irwin JA, Dale PJ, Twyman RM, Ma JK-C: Pharma-planta: road testing the developing regulatory guidelines for plant-made pharmaceuticals. Transgenic Res. 2007, 16: 147-161. 10.1007/s11248-007-9074-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutchens TW: Tobacco seed. Tobacco production, chemistry and technology. Edited by: Davis DL, Nielsen MT. 1999, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 66-69.Google Scholar
  9. Reichman JR, Watrud LS, Lee EH, Burdick CA, Bollman MA, Storm MJ, King GA, Mallory-Smith C: Establishment of transgenic herbicide-resistant creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) in nonagronomic habitats. Mol Ecol. 2006, 15: 4243-4255. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03072.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ramessar K, Sabalza M, Capell T, Christou P: Maize plants: an ideal production platform for effective and safe molecular pharming. Plant Sci. 2008, 174: 409-419. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.02.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Breyer D, Goossens M, Herman P, Sneyers M: Biosafety considerations associated with molecular farming in genetically modified plants. J Med Plants Res. 2009, 3: 825-838.Google Scholar
  12. Trojak-Goluch A, Berbec A: Cytological investigations of the interspecific hybrids of Nicotiana tabacum L. × N. glauca Grah. J Applied Genetics. 2003, 44: 45-54.Google Scholar
  13. Zaitlin D, Chambers OD, Li B, Mundell RE, Davies HM: Correspondence 1: drugs in crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 507-507. 10.1038/nbt0504-507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Trojak-Goluch A, Berbeć A: Meiosis and fertility in interspecific hybrids of Nicotiana tabacum L. × N. glauca Grah. and their derivatives. Plant Breeding. 2007, 126: 201-206. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01341.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Al-Ahmad H, Galili S, Gressel J: Infertile interspecific hybrids between transgenically mitigated Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana sylvestris did not backcross to N. sylvestris. Plant Sci. 2006, 170 (5): 953-961. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.01.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Haseloff J, Siemering KR, Prasher DC, Hodge S: Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 2122-2127. 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Morise H, Shimomura O, Johnson FH, Winant J: Intermolecular energy transfer in the bioluminescent system of Aequorea. Biochemistry. 1974, 13: 2656-2662. 10.1021/bi00709a028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Millwood R, Halfhill M, Harkins D, Russotti R, Stewart CN: Instrumentation and methodology for quantifying GFP fluorescence in intact plant organs. Biotechniques. 2003, 34: 638-643.Google Scholar
  19. Horsch R, Fry J, Hoffmann N, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley R: A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985, 227: 1229-1231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. McCormick S, Niedermeyer J, Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch R, Fraley R: Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep. 1986, 5: 81-84. 10.1007/BF00269239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Stewart CN, Via LE: A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques. 1993, 14: 748-750.Google Scholar
  22. Hudson LC, Chamberlain D, Stewart CN: GFP-tagged pollen to monitor pollen flow of transgenic plants. Mol Ecol Notes. 2001, 1: 321-324. 10.1046/j.1471-8278.2001.00079.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Weissinger AK, Warwick SI, Stewart CN: Additive transgene expression and genetic introgression in multiple green-fluorescent protein transgenic crop × weed hybrid generations. Theoretical Applied Genetics. 2003, 107: 1533-1540. 10.1007/s00122-003-1397-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Galbraith DW: Simultaneous flow cytometric quantification of plant nuclear DNA contents over the full range of described angiosperm 2C values. Cytometry Part A. 2009, 75: 692-698.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Doležel J, Sgorbati S, Lucretti S: Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiol Plant. 1992, 85: 625-631. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb04764.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayers NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E: Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science. 1983, 220: 1049-1051. 10.1126/science.220.4601.1049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson LC, Stewart CN: Effects of pollen-synthesized green fluorescent protein on pollen grain fitness. Sexual Plant Reprod. 2004, 17: 49-53. 10.1007/s00497-004-0203-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH: The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Botany. 1963, 50: 859-865. 10.2307/2439772.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelder JA: New kinds of systematic designs for spacing experiments. Biometrics. 1962, 18: 283-307. 10.2307/2527473.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ginsberg H: Honey bee orientation behaviour and the influence of flower distribution on foraging movements. Ecol Entomol. 1986, 11: 173-179. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1986.tb00292.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Association IST: International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci Technol. 1999, 27 (Suppl): 333-Google Scholar
  32. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965, 52: 591-611.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Levene H: Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Edited by: Olkin I. 1960, Palto Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 278-291. vol. 2Google Scholar
  34. Tremblay R, Wang D, Jevnikar AM, Ma S: Tobacco, a highly efficient green bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2010, 28: 214-221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Daniell H, Streatfield SJ, Wycoff K: Medical molecular farming: production of antibodies, biopharmaceuticals and edible vaccines in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6: 219-226. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01922-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ling HY, Edwards AM, Gantier MP, DeBoer KD, Neale AD, Hamill JD, Walmsley AM: An interspecific Nicotiana hybrid as a useful and cost-effective platform for production of animal vaccines. PloS ONE. 2012, 7: e35688-10.1371/journal.pone.0035688.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Hiatt A, Caffferkey R, Bowdish K: Production of antibodies in transgenic plants. Nature. 1989, 342: 76-78. 10.1038/342076a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang DJ, Brandsma M, Yin Z, Wang A, Jevnikar AM, Ma S: A novel platform for biologically active recombinant human interleukin-13 production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008, 6: 504-515. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00337.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Arumuganathan K, Earle E: Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Reporter. 1991, 9: 208-218. 10.1007/BF02672069.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Narayan R: Nuclear DNA changes, genome differentiation and evolution in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Plant System Evol. 1987, 157: 161-180. 10.1007/BF00936195.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Leitch I, Bennett M: Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linnean Soc. 2004, 82: 651-663. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Laughnan JR, Gabay-Laughnan S: Cytoplasmic male sterility in maize. Annu Rev Genet. 1983, 17: 27-48. 10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.000331.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Janska H, Sarria R, Woloszynska M, Arrieta-Montiel M, Mackenzie SA: Stoichiometric shifts in the common bean mitochondrial genome leading to male sterility and spontaneous reversion to fertility. Plant Cell. 1998, 10: 1163-1180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. USDA: The PLANTS database. 2012, Greensboro, NC USA: National Plant Data TeamGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rice et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.