Skip to main content

Modeling and optimizing in vitro percentage and speed callus induction of carrot via Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete GA and radial basis function

Abstract

Background

Callus induction is the first step in optimizing plant regeneration. Fit embryogenesis and shooting rely on callus induction. In addition, using artificial intelligence models in combination with an algorithm can be helpful in the optimization of in vitro culture. The present study aimed to evaluate the percentage and speed of callus induction optimization in carrot with a Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete genetic algorithm (GA).

Materials and methods

In this study, the outputs included callus induction percentage and speed, while inputs were different types and concentrations of plant growth regulator (0. 5, 0.2 mg/l 2,4-D, 0.3, 0.2, 0.5 mg/l BAP, 1, 0.2 mg/l Kin, and 2 mg/l NAA), different explants (shoot, root, leaf, and nodal), a different concentration compound of MS medium (1 × MS, 4× MS, and 8× MS) and time of sampling. The data were obtained in the laboratory, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF), two well-known ANNs, were employed to model. Then, GA was used for optimization, and sensitivity analysis was performed to indicate the inputs’ importance.

Results

The results showed that MLP had better prediction efficiency than RBF. Based on the results, R2 in training and testing data was 95 and 95% for the percentage of callus induction, while it was 94 and 95% for the speed of callus induction, respectively. In addition, a concentration compound of MS had high sensitivity, while times of sampling had low sensitivity. Based on the MLP-Single point discrete GA, the best results were obtained for shoot explants, 1× MS media, and 0.5 mg/l 2, 4-D + 0.5 mg/l BAP. Further, a non-significant difference was observed between the test result and predicted MLP.

Conclusions

Generally, MLP-Single point discrete GA is considered a potent tool for predicting treatment and fit model results used in plant tissue culture and selecting the best medium for callus induction.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Today, genetic engineering is used for different goals in plants, including improving, modifying, or creating a new trait and producing vaccines by molecular farming [1]. For this purpose, optimizing plant tissue culture is crucial. The first step in tissue culture produces high and fit callus induction.

The carrot is a plant model for producing vaccines by molecular farming [1]. For this reason, optimizing the tissue culture of carrots is essential. The best callus is the first step for proper regeneration and healthy plantlets [2,3,4].

Many studies were conducted to improve callus induction [5, 6]. In this regard, different explants, plant growth regulators, and media cultures were used for callogenesis. Testing all of these treatments is costly and time-consuming.

Seemingly, new methods are required for modeling and optimizing callus induction, while traditional models may not be suitable. Several non-linear biological processes based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) can be used for this purpose since they have more flexibility in modeling in vitro culture [7,8,9]. Different types of ANNs are available such as Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), radial basis function (RBF), and Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) [10]. Many studies used the ANN model for modeling and optimizing plant tissue culture [7, 11, 12]. However, the ANN model has not formerly been used to optimize callus induction in carrot plant. Thus, the present study is considered the first report of in vitro callus induction model in the carrot.

MLP is a type of ANNs, applied for different purposes, such as clustering, predicting, and classifying complex systems [13]. MLP can identify the relationship between target and input variables and recognize the inherent knowledge in the datasets without previous physical considerations [14]. However, MLP does not present a neat mathematical formula that illustrates the relative relationship of each independent variable in the model. Hence, MLP is considered a “black box.” MLP consists of numerous highly interconnected processing neurons working parallel to solve a particular problem [14]. MLP is learned by example. The examples should be carefully chosen; otherwise, time is wasted, or even worse, the model might work inaccurately [14]. The main demerit point of MLP is that its operation can be unpredictable because MLP learns how to find the solutions by itself [14]. On the other hand, RBF is engaging, powerful, and easy-to-interpret ANNs with supervised learning [15]. However, most plant tissue culture studies have employed the individual ANN, and the comparison between these ANNs has rarely been studied in the tissue culture area [16].

Multi-objective functions can improve optimization problems in plant tissue culture and callus induction. In addition,many trials and errors to optimize the input data. Today, researchers have implemented a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to reduce the volumes of the calculations [7, 10, 11]. Many parameters should be considered for optimizing the callus induction. The GA is unsuitable for this purpose since it cannot check several factors simultaneously [17, 18]. Non-dominated Single point discrete GA was used for the first time to solve this problem, considered the first algorithm for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In addition, it can analyze multiple parameters simultaneously [19].

Different machine learning algorithms (e.g., ANNs, neuro-fuzzy logic systems, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest) have been recently used for modeling and predicting various in vitro culture systems such as explant sterilization [13, 20], in vitro seed germination [21], callogenesis [22,23,24], androgenesis [25], shoot proliferation [15, 26], rhizogenesis [27], in vitro secondary metabolite production [28,29,30], and gene transformation [31, 32]. Among machine learning algorithms, different types of ANNs, such as MLP, radial basis function (RBF), and generalized regression neural network (GRNN), have been widely employed to model and predict in vitro culture processes [16, 33, 34]. Patra et al. used an ANN-genetic algorithm and response surface methodology to optimize ultrasound-assisted extraction of ascorbic acid, protein, and total antioxidants from cashew apple bagasse using an ANN-genetic algorithm and response surface methodology [35]. The application of ANNs and GAs to predict and optimize greenhouse banana fruit yield through nitrogen, potassium, and magnesium was performed by Ramezanpour et al. [36]. Also, artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm used for optimization in food processing [37].

For the first time, the present study aims to find the best optimization for a type of callus induction of some parameters such as explants (nodal, root, leaf, and shoot), sampling day, and type and concentration of plant growth regulator. Besides, the concentration of Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium was performed using non-linear MLP-non-dominated Single point discrete GA and radial basis function modeling in carrot.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Seeds of carrot (Daucus carota L. cv. Nantaise) were prepared from Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (Karaj, Iran). Then, the seed surface was sterilized with a solution of 70% ethanol for 1 min, sodium hypochlorite (5%) for 20 min, and rinsed with sterile water three times [38].

Media and culture condition

The sterile seeds were cultured in ½ MS medium supplemented with 3% sucrose and solidified with 0.8% agar. Then, the pH of the medium was regulated to 5.7 by 1 N KOH or 1 N HCl before autoclaving, maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, and exposed to light for 16 h and dark for 8 h per day [38]. Ultimately, the seedling was prepared after two to three weeks of culturing sterile seeds [39].

Experimental design

Foremost, the explants were used, including root, shoot, nodal, and leaf. Then, they were excised in 3-mm pieces. The experiments were performed based on a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 24 replicates per treatment by three sub-sets. The data were analyzed using SPSS software, and different means were identified using Tukey’s test (P = 0.05).

The eight treatments were evaluated for callus induction in carrot. In this study, the type and concentration of plant growth regulators [2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D), 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP), Kinetin (Kin), and 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)], different concentrations of MS medium (1× MS, 4× MS, 8× MS) used for different explants (leaf, nodal, root, and shoot), different times of sampling (8 and 25 days) were analyzed. Table 1 shows the results of data analysis.

Table 1 Statistics of MLP models for the percentage of callus induction and speed of callus induction of carrot (training vs. testing values) in carrot

The reason for choosing 4× MS and 8× MS in this research was to investigate the effect of increasing minerals on the speed and percentage of callus induction.

In this research, hormonal compounds were used from previous studies, as well as new hormonal compounds with different concentrations, to determine the best hormonal combination to reach the highest speed and percentage of callus formation.

The effect of different treatments on callus induction was evaluated after 25 days of culture. The obtained data from laboratory tests were used for modeling and optimization using MLP-non-dominated Single point discrete GA (data not shown).

Calculatingthe speed of callus induction

Speed of callus induction obtained from sampling time divided by average callus diameter.

Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model

The type and concentration of plant growth regulators (2, 4-D, BAP, Kin, and NAA), different concentrations of MS medium (1× MS, 4× MS, 8× MS) used for different explants (leaf, nodal, root, and shoot), and different times of sampling (8 and 25 days) were considered the inputs. In addition, the speed and percentage of callus induction were considered the outputs in the MLP model (Fig. 1). In this study, 90% of the data were used for training and 10% for testing the data in the model. Different values of the parameters for a significant model were used to indicate the best construct of each model based on error analysis. Lastly, in each model, the results were obtained by considering the minimum estimation error based on Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2) as follows:

$${\text{RMSE}} = \sqrt {\mathop \sum \limits_{{{\text{i}} = 1}}^{{\text{n}}} (yi - \hat{y}i)^{2 } } /n$$
$${\text{R}}^{2} = 1 - \frac{{\mathop \sum \nolimits_{{{\text{i}} = 1 }}^{{\text{n}}} \left( {yi - \hat{y}} \right)2}}{{\mathop \sum \nolimits_{{{\text{i}} = 1 }}^{{\text{n}}} \left( {yi - \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{y} } \right)2}}$$
Fig. 1
figure 1

The schematic plan of the proposed MLP method

As shown above, the best fit for RMSE and R2 values is 0 and 1, respectively. The MLP includes an input layer, one or more hidden layers, and an output layer [40, 41]. In MLP, the number of hidden layers is shown along with the number of neurons in each layer [40].

In this study, Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete GA was used with 11 hidden layers by Error Back Propagation (EBP) algorithm with a Bayesian method to indicate the speed and percentage of callus induction. The proper response of this method in a nonlinear model and sustainability in the face of noisy data are considered the main reasons for using Multilayer Perceptron-Artificial Neural Network and Bayesian method [42,43,44].

Optimization process with MLP

Chromosome/population value should be first given for evaluating decision variables, mutation, selection, and cross-over to select the best solution by MLP. Finally, the members with the highest rank should be removed, and the new members as parents should be selected for producing the next generation.

Obtaining the best fitness was used to select the best population. One hundred initial populations and 1000 repeats were set.

The optimal input values included different concentrations of 2, 4-D, BAP, Kin, and NAA, different concentrations of MS, and various explants such as the leaf, nodal, root, and shoot. Different sampling times were determined to achieve the best output speed for callus induction based on the MLP Model.

Radial basis function (RBF)

RBF is a three-layer ANN consisting of an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer. This is the basis and principle for radial basis networks, which organize statistical ANNs. Statistical ANNs refer to networks that, in contrast to the traditional ANNs, implement regression-based approaches and have not been emulated by biological neural networks [45]. In an RBF model, the Euclidean distance between the center of each neuron and the input is considered the input of the transfer function for that neuron. The most well-known transfer function in RBF is the Gaussian function, which is determined based on the following equation:

$$f(X_{r} ,X_{b} ) = e^{{ - [||X_{r} - X_{b} ||*0.8326/h]^{2} }}$$

where \(X_{r}\), \(X_{b}\), and h are input with unknown output, observed inputs in time b, and spread, respectively. The function’s output was close to 1 when \(||X_{r} - X_{b} ||\) approached 0 and 0 when \(||X_{r} - X_{b} ||\) approached a significant value. Finally, the dependent variable (Yr) by predictor Xr was determined as follows:

$$Y_{r} = \sum\limits_{b = 1}^{m} {w_{b} *f(X_{r} ,X_{b} ) + w_{0} }$$

where w0 and \(w_{j}\) are the bias and weight of linkage between the bth hidden layer and the output layer, respectively.

Sensitivity analyses

Sensitivity analysis was used to determine which input parameters affected the output model most. In addition, it was used to determine which input parameters, including the type and concentration of 2, 4-D, BAP, Kin, and NAA, different concentrations of MS medium (1× MS, 4× MS, 8× MS), different explants such as the leaf, nodal, root, and shoot, as well as different times of sampling (8 and 25 days) were effective most in obtaining the highest speed and percentage of callus induction. The sensitivity of output vs. input variables was determined based on the variable sensitivity error (VSE) value, which indicates the performance of the developed MLP model when all data are unavailable. Further, it specified a relative indication between the MLP model error and the VSE when all variables are available. VSR ranks the variables, where the essential variable has a higher value of VSR. The analysis indicated which variable is more significant than the other parameters for callus induction.

Validation experiment

The obtained data and laboratory results, including the speed and percentage of callus induction, were used for optimization by MLP-Single point discrete GA and tested for evaluating the effects of the MLP-Single point discrete GA model. Then, the speed and percentage of callus induction were optimized as in vitro parameters.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA analysis was performed based on a CRD with three replications. Tukey's test identified significantly different means (P = 0.05).

Results

After analyzing the data obtained in the laboratory using SPSS software, the following results were obtained.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the results obtained in the laboratory with the results obtained from the ANN.

In MS medium (MS in natural concentration)

Regarding MS medium in natural concentration in Additional file 1, the highest callus induction was obtained at shoot explants in media 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7, as well as nodal explants in media 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. However, the lowest callus induction was reported in nodal explants in media 1, 7, and all explants in medium 8 (Fig. 2) (Fig. 6. A, B, C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of callus induction in MS medium in carrot

In addition, the maximum speed of the callus was observed in the leaf and root in medium 4. In contrast, the minimum speed of callus was reported in nodal explant in media 1 and 7 and all explants in medium 8 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Speed of callus induction in MS medium in carrot

In 4× MS medium (MS in 4× concentration)

In 4× MS medium (MS in 4× concentration in Additional file 2), the percentage of callus induction in media 5, 6, and 7 was 100%, while it was 0% in media 1, 2, 4, and 8 (Fig. 4) (Fig. 6D, E).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Percentage of callus induction in 4 MS medium in carrot

Further, the highest speed of callus was in root explants in treatment 5, while the lowest was in 1, 2, 4, and 8 media in all explants (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Speed of callus induction in 4 MS medium in carrot

In 8× MS medium (MS in 8× concentration)

Regarding 8× MS medium (MS in 8× concentration in Additional file 3), the callus induction and speed of callus in all treatments and four explants were 0% (Fig. 6F, G).

Fig. 6
figure 6

A Callus induction of root explant in MS medium of treatment 6. B Callus induction of leaf explant in MS medium of treatment 6. C Callus induction of shoot explant in MS medium of treatment 6. D Callus induction of leaf explant in 4 MS medium of treatment 6. E Callus induction of shoot explant in 4 MS medium of treatment 6. F Callus induction of shoot explant in 8 MS medium of treatment 6. G Callus induction of root explant in 8 MS medium of treatment 6

The results indicated the best medium for percentage and speed callus induction was MS medium in treatment six by shoot explant. In 8× MS medium by all explants and treatments, the percentage and speed of callus induction was 0%.

Based on the obtained results, the type and concentration of explants and plant growth regulator, kind of explants and concentration of the compound in MS medium, and sampling time should be optimized for obtaining the highest callus induction. Data were also analyzed with the MLP model to confirm obtained results in the laboratory.

Modeling and comparative analysis of MLP and RBF

MLP and RBF models were used to confirm the results obtained in the laboratory. In the current study, MLP and RBF models were used to model the speed and percentage of callus induction as an output on base input, including different types of explants and other kinds and concentrations of plant growth regulator, different concentrations of compounds in MS medium. Data modeling through machine learning algorithms can provide a reliable approach to improve detailed knowledge of carrot speed and the percentage of callus induction. Then, MLP Model was used to analyze the predicted and accurate data. R2 in training and testing data was over 95% and 95%, and 94% and 95% in the percentage and speed of callus induction by MLP model, respectively. By RBF model R2 in training and testing data were 88% and 83%, and 81% and 83% in the callus induction percentage and speed, respectively (Tables 1, 2).

Table 2 Statistics of RBF models for the percentage of callus induction and speed of callus induction of carrot (training vs. testing values) in carrot

Model accuracy was evaluated by RMSE and MBE, which found MLP to be more accurate than RBF (Tables 1, 2). Also, the regression lines revealed a good fit correlation between experimental and predicted values for embryogenic callus production rate in both the training and testing sets (Figs. 7, 8, 9). Also, the results obtained in the laboratory were confirmed by the MLP model.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The neural network output regression and the coefficient of multiple correlation (R) for the percentage of callus induction in carrot by MLP model

Fig. 8
figure 8

The neural network output regression and the coefficient of multiple correlation (R) for the speed of callus induction in carrot by MLP model

Fig. 9
figure 9

A The neural network performance based on MSE vs. epochs of percentage of callus induction in carrot. B The neural network performance based on MSE vs. epochs of speed of callus induction

Sensitivity analysis of the models

Sensitivity analysis was used to determine the sensitivity values of outputs and the effect of each input data on the percentage and speed of callus induction. The results showed that the highest sensitivity was related to the compound concentration in MS. At the same time, the lowest was related to the time of sampling in outputs, including the percentage and speed of callus induction (Figs. 10, 11 and 12).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Sensitivity analysis of callus induction based on type of explants in carrot

Fig. 11
figure 11

Sensitivity analysis of callus induction based on different concentrations of compound of MS in carrot

Fig. 12
figure 12

Sensitivity analysis of callus induction based on times of the sampling in carrot

Validation experiment

Based on the results of the validation experiment (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), the MLP model was considered an appropriate method to indicate the best explants, the best type of plant, the concentration of plant growth regulators, the time of sampling, and concentration of the compound of MS medium for percentage and speed callus induction. In addition, the MLP model was considered a robust method for predicting the results of in vitro experiments.

In this study, treatment 6 was the best treatment for the percentage and speed of callus induction (Table 3), including 0.5 mg/l 2, 4-D + 0.5 mg/l BAP in shoot explants in 1× MS media. This result was also obtained by laboratory testing and the MLP model.

Table 3 The plant growth regulatory used in this study in carrot

GA optimization process with MLP model

Results of optimizations with different fitness functions are shown in Figs. 13A, B, 14. Considering the speed and the percentage of callus induction, the single, together, and best explants for callus induction are different.

Fig. 13
figure 13

A Fitness function of speed of callus induction value vs number of optimization generations in carrot. B Fitness function of callus induction percentage value vs number of optimization generations in carrot

The best fitness function result of the speed of callus induction optimization alone obtain from leaf explants, 1× MS medium on the eighth day of sampling and in the sixth treatment (Fig. 13).

The highest fitness function of the percentage of callus induction optimization alone was obtained from shoot explants, 1× MS medium in 25 days of sampling the sixth treatment (Fig. 13).

Nevertheless, the best fitness function of speed and percentage of callus induction optimization were obtained together from shoot explants, 1× MS medium on the eighth day of sampling, and in the sixth treatment (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14
figure 14

Multi objective fitness function value vs number of optimization generations in carrot

Discussion

Optimizing tissue culture in plants is essential for manipulation using genetic engineering. The manipulation is used for creating or improving the plant traits and producing vaccines in the plant.

In this regard, callus induction is the first step in the tissue culture process [46], the efficiency of which can be obtained with different explants, types, and concentrations of various plant growth regulators and media. The best speed for each treatment is essential for acquiring the highest callus induction speed.

Testing all the treatments in the lab is complex, time-consuming, and costly. Therefore, it is appropriate to use genetic algorithms to solve these problems.

The results indicated the effect of treatments, including explants, types and concentration of plant growth regulator, time of sampling on concentration, and speed of callus induction via MLP and RBF.

Most plant tissue culture studies have employed MLP for modeling and predicting in vitro culture systems. According to these results, MLP had better performance than RBF for modeling and predicting carrot callus induction.

This study’s experimental results (data obtained from the laboratory) and MLP model results were similar. These results confirmed that the MLP model efficiently predicts tissue culture stages.

In addition, the high correlation between predicted and observed training and testing values indicated that this model is effective for the variables in the study.

One of the factors analyzed in this study was the type and concentration of plant growth regulators. The use of NAA in plant tissue culture was used in some studies [, 7,8,9,10, 47,48,49].

In the present study, analysis of percentage and speed callus induction in sensitivity analysis with MLP model indicates the highest effect in percentage, and speed callus induction was related to 0.5 mg/l 2, 4-D + 0.5 mg/l BAP in shoot explants in 1× MS media. However, a reduction occurred in the percentage and speed of callus induction at low concentrations of BAP and 2, 4-D [47]. These results were confirmed by the data obtained in the laboratory.

In general, 2, 4-D is a type of auxin necessary for inducing callus. Based on the results of the previous study, a high concentration of 2, 4-D can block normal callus induction [50] and disrupt natural genetic and physiological processes [51]. Hardegger et al. used 0.1 mg/l 2, 4-D for callus induction in carrot [52]. Also, Marquet-Blouin et al. and Yau et al. indicated 1 mg/l 2, 4-D as the most influential factor in callus induction in carrot [1, 51]. In another study, Rabiei et al. demonstrated 0.2 mg/l 2, 4-D as the highest callus induction [53].

6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) or benzyl adenine (BA) is a first-generation synthetic cytokinin, which plays a different role in the tissue culture of the plant, including eliciting plants, growth and development responses, setting blossoms, and stimulating fruit richness by stimulating cell division. The results of the present study are consistent with those of Pant et al. and Rabiei et al., which indicated 1 mg/l BAP needed for callus induction [12, 54, 55] and Heidegger et al., which used 0.5 mg/l BAP for callus induction. These results are similar to the results of this study [52].

Optimization analysis with the MLP model indicates that MS medium with 1× compound is considered the best medium for callus induction of 4× and 8× MS media. The callus induction in 8× MS media was 0%. Thus, the concentration compound of the medium is essential for the percentage and speed of inducing callus.

In addition, MgSO4, CaCl2, and MnSO4 are macroelement nutrients essential for growing explants in the tissue culture [8].

Magnesium is an essential component of the chlorophyll molecule, vital for the activity of several nonspecific enzymes, as well as for transferring phosphates. MgSO4, as a chlorophyll molecule, is considered the central atom in the porphyrin structure. A magnesium ion in plants is flexible and plays the role of cation, balancing, and neutralizing anions and organic acids. MgSO4 is often used as a unique source of both magnesium and sulfate ions [10].

The concentration of MgSO4 is 370 mg/l in MS media. Walker and Sato [56] observed a significant reduction in the callus induction formed from Medicago sativa when Mg2+ is omitted from the medium. It also indicated the highest level of magnesium in melon, which is effective in callus induction [56].

Additionally, calcium is a cofactor with different enzymes essential for synthesizing cell walls. Calcium deficiency causes shoot tip necrosis. Calcium chloride is the commonly used form of calcium in plant tissue culture. Finally, calcium plays a role in pH cellular, a regulator in the source, as well as the sinking translocation of carbohydrates [57]. In addition, they indicated that 9 mM has the highest effect on callus induction among five concentrations of CaCl2 (0.1, 1, 3, 6, and 9 mM). The concentration of CaCl2 is 400 mg/l in the MS culture medium.

Manganese (Mn) is a cofactor needed for some enzyme reactions, specifically in respiration and photosynthesis. In addition, manganese sulfate is usually considered the added form in plant medium.

In another study, Sarropoulou et al. [58] indicated that the callus induction is doubled at 200 μM MnSO4 compared to the control. Further, the concentration of MnSO4 is 22.3 mg/l in the MS culture medium.

Eventually, shoot explants, including 1× MS media and 0.5 mg/l 2, 4-D + 0.5 mg/l BAP have the highest effect in percentage and speed callus induction.

Conclusion

Multiple models should be used to solve the problems related to tissue culture. In this study, MLP-Single point discrete GA, as a new computational tool, was used to predict the percentage and speed callus induction in carrot. This model can be used quickly to identify the interaction between treatments compared to statistical analysis in many experiments. The results indicated that MLP-Single point discrete GA is considered a fit model for predicting the optimum multi-treatment of in vitro tissue culture.

This study used Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete GA to optimize in vitro percentage and speed callus induction of carrot for the first time. Accordingly, this is the innovation of this research.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Marquet-Blouin E, Bouche FB, Steinmetz A, Muller CP. Neutralizing immunogenicity of transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.)-derived measles virus hemagglutinin. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;51:459–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin DH, Kim JS, Kim IJJ, Yang Oh SK, Chung GC, Han KH. A shoot regeneration protocol effective on diverse genotpypes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2000;36:273–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Šuštar-Vozlič J, Javornik B, Bohanec B. Studies of somaclonal variation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Phyton (Austria). 1999;39:283–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shao CY, Russinova EA, Iantcheva A, Atanassov McCormac A, Chen DF, Elliott MC, Slater A. Rapid transformation and regeneration of alfalfa (Medicago falcata L.) via direct somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regul. 2000;31:155–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin Y, Li S, Chen Y, Guo H, Tian W, Chen Y, Li L. Fertile plants regenerated from suspension culture-derived protoplasts of an indica type rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1993;32:61–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang YS, Zheng YD, Chen YL, Jian YY. Improvement of plant regeneration from long-term cultured calluses of Taipei 309, a model rice variety in in vitro studies. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1999;57:199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arab MM, Yadollahi A, Eftekhari M, Ahmadi H, Akbari M, Khorami SS. Modeling and optimizing a new culture medium for in vitro rooting of G× N15 Prunus rootstock using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm. Sci Rep. 2018;8:e9977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27858-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alanagh EN, Garoosi GA, Haddad R, Maleki S, Landín M, Gallego PP. Design of tissue culture media for efficient Prunus rootstock micropropagation using artificial intelligence models. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014;117:349–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-014-0444-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamshidi S, Yadollahi A, Ahmadi H, Arab M, Eftekhari M. Predicting in vitro culture medium macro-nutrients composition for pear rootstocks using regression analysis and neural network models. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:e274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arab MM, Yadollahi A, Shojaeiyan A, Ahmadi H. Artificial neural network genetic algorithm as powerful tool to predict and optimize in vitro proliferation mineral medium for G× N15 rootstock. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:e1526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Araghinejad S, Hosseini-Moghari SM, Eslamian S. Application of data-driven models in drought forecasting. In: Eslamian S, editor. Handbook of drought and water scarcity. New York: CRC Press; 2017. p. 423–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hesami M, Naderi R, Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi M, Rahmati M. Data-driven modeling in plant tissue culture. J Appl Environ Biol Sci. 2017;7:37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hesami M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M. Modeling and optimizing in vitro sterilization of Chrysanthemum via multilayer perceptron-non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (MLP-NSGAII). Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hesami M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M, Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi M. Development of support vector machine-based model and comparative analysis with artificial neural network for modeling the plant tissue culture procedures: effect of plant growth regulators on somatic embryogenesis of chrysanthemum, as a case study. Plant Methods. 2020;16:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00655-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hesami M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M. Modeling and optimizing medium composition for shoot regeneration of Chrysanthemum via radial basis function-non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (RBF-NSGAII). Sci Rep. 2019;9:18237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54257-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hesami M, Jones AMP. Application of artificial intelligence models and optimization algorithms in plant cell and tissue culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:9449–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10888-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bozorg-Haddad O, Azarnivand A, Hosseini-Moghari SM, Loáiciga HA. Development of a comparative multiple criteria framework for ranking pareto optimal solutions of a multiobjective reservoir operation problem. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2016;142:e04016019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Wong KC. Multiobjective patient stratification using evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;22:1619–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2769711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Shen Y, Zhang X, Cui G, Sun J. An improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (INSGA-II) applied to the design of DNA codewords. Math Comput Simul. 2018;151:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2018.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ivashchuk OA, Fedorova V, Shcherbinina NV, Maslova EV, Shamraeva E. Microclonal propagation of plant process modeling and optimization of its parameters based on neural network. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10:3170–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hesami M, Pepe M, Monthony AS, Baiton A, Phineas Jones AM. Modeling and optimizing in vitro seed germination of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Ind Crops Prod. 2021;170:113753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hesami M, Jones AMP. Modeling and optimizing callus growth and development in Cannabis sativa using random forest and support vector machine in combination with a genetic algorithm. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:5201–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11375-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Niazian M, Sadat-Noori SA, Abdipour M, Tohidfar M, Mortazavian SMM. Image processing and artificial neural network-based models to measure and predict physical properties of embryogenic callus and number of somatic embryos in Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi (L.) Sprague). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2018;54:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-017-9877-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hesami M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M, Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi M. Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (ANFIS-NSGAII) for modeling and optimizing somatic embryogenesis of Chrysanthemum. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Niazian M, Shariatpanahi ME, Abdipour M, Oroojloo M. Modeling callus induction and regeneration in an anther culture of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) using image processing and artificial neural network method. Protoplasma. 2019;256:1317–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01379-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hesami M, Condori-Apfata JA, Valderrama Valencia M, Mohammadi M. Application of artificial neural network for modeling and studying in vitro genotype-independent shoot regeneration in wheat. Appl Sci. 2020;10:5370. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mridula MR, Nair AS, Kumar KS. Genetic programming based models in plant tissue culture: an addendum to traditional statistical approach. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1005976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Salehi M, Farhadi S, Moieni A, Safaie N, Hesami MA. hybrid model based on general regression neural network and fruit fly optimization algorithm for forecasting and optimizing paclitaxel biosynthesis in Corylus avellana cell culture. Plant Methods. 2021;17:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00714-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Salehi M, Farhadi S, Moieni A, Safaie N, Ahmadi H. Mathematical modeling of growth and paclitaxel biosynthesis in Corylus avellana cell culture responding to fungal elicitors using multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Farhadi S, Salehi M, Moieni A, Safaie N, Sabet MS. Modeling of paclitaxel biosynthesis elicitation in Corylus avellana cell culture using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-genetic algorithm (ANFIS-GA) and multiple regression methods. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0237478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hesami M, Alizadeh M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M. Forecasting and optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation via ensemble model- fruit fly optimization algorithm: a data mining approach using chrysanthemum databases. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0239901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Niazian M, Niedbała G, Sabbatini P. Modeling Agrobacterium -mediated gene transformation of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)—a model plant for gene transformation studies. Front Plant Sci. 2021;11:695110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.695110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fakhrzad F, Jowkar A, Hosseinzadeh J. Mathematical modeling and optimizing the in vitro shoot proliferation of wallflower using multilayer perceptron non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (MLP-NSGAII). PLoS ONE. 2022;17(9):e0273009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohsen H, Roohangiz N, Masoud T. Modeling and optimizing medium composition for shoot regeneration of Chrysanthemum via radial basis function-nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (RBF-NSGAII). Sci Rep. 2019;9:18237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54257-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Abhipriya P, Abdullah S, Rama CP. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of ascorbic acid, protein and total antioxidants from cashew apple bagasse using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm and response surface methodology. J Food Process Preserv. 2022;10:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03638-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahmoud Reza R, Mostafa F. Application of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm to predict and optimize greenhouse banana fruit yield through nitrogen, potassium and magnesium. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(2):e0264040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarkar T, Salauddin M, Mukherjee A, Shariati MA, Rebezov M, Tretyak L, Pateiro M, Lorenzo JM. Application of bio-inspired optimization algorithms in food processing. Curr Res Food Sci. 2022;5:432–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ana CT, Ligia RS, Jorge MC. In vitro propagation of the wild carrot Daucus carota L. subsp. Halophilus (Brot.) A. Pujadas for conservation purposes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2010;46:47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Murashige T, Skoog FA. Revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physol Plant. 1962;15:437–97.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 1982;2:359–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/08936080(89)90020-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Eslamian S, Abedi-Koupai J, Amiri M, Gohari S. Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration using support vector. Res J Environ Sci. 2009;3:439–47. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hecht-Nielsen R. Theory of the backpropagation neural network. Cambridge: Academic Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Karlik B, Olgac AV. Performance analysis of various activation functions in generalized MLP architectures of neural networks. Int J Artif Intell Expert Syst. 2011;1(4):111–22.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Suratgar AA, Tavakoli MB, Hoseinabadi A. Modified Levenberg–Marquardt method for neural networks training. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2005;6(1):46–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lin J, Zhao Y, Watson D, Chen C. The radial basis function differential quadrature method with ghost points. Math Comput Simul. 2020;173:105–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Elizabeth ME, Dania O, Govea A, Marisela H, Jacquelynne C, Jorge A, Salazar G, Andrea RM, Gabriela R, Teresa G, Gladis F, Edda S, Sergio RM. Towards the development of an oral vaccine against porcine cysticercosis: expression of the protective HP6/TSOL18 antigen in transgenic carrots cells. Planta. 2015;243:675–85.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gago J, Martínez-Núñez L, Landín M, Gallego P. Artificial neural networks as an alternative to the traditional statistical methodology in plant research. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167:23–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nezami-Alanagh E, Garoosi GA, Maleki S, Landín M, Gallego PP. Predicting optimal in vitro culture medium for Pistacia vera micropropagation using neural networks models. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2017;129:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1152-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gago J, Perez- Tornero O, Landin M, Burgos L, Gallego P. Improving knowledge of plant tissue culture and media formulation by neurofuzzy logic: a practical case of data mining using apricot databases. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168:1858–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zuzana V, Kateřina E, Lucie F, Martin V. The role of auxins in somatic embryogenesis of Abies alba. Cent Eur J Biol. 2011;6(4):587–96.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Malgorzata G. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis induction and plant regeneration with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Growth Regul. 2004;43(1):27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Markus H, Arnd S. Transformation and regeneration of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Mol Breed. 1988;4:119–27.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Keramat R, Aleksey P, Mahmood KH, Olga SH, Elena K, Saadollah H, Mansour O. Carrot (Daucus carota L.) in vitro regeneration. Veg Crops Res Bull. 2010;73:13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pant B, Manandhar S. In vitro propagation of carrot (Daucus carota) L. Sci World. 2007;5(5):51–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yuan-Yeu Y, Kevin YW. Increased regeneration ability of transgenic callus of carrot (Daucus carota L.) on B5-based regeneration medium. J Appl Hortic. 2010;14(1).

  56. Walker DA. Polarographic measurement of photosynthe photosynthetic oxygen evolution by leaf discs. New Photol. 1981;89:165–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Noor UA, Mateen K, Iftikhar A. Corm and cormel size of gladiolus greatly influenced growth and development of subsequent corm production. Pak J Bot. 2013;45(4):1407–9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sarropoulou E, Sundaram AY, Kaitetzidou E, Kotoulas G, Gilfillan GD, Papandroulakis N, Mylonas CC, Magoulas A. Full genome survey and dynamics of gene expression in the greater Amberjack Seriola dumerili. GigaScience. 2017;6(12):108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted in Shahid Beheshti University, faculty of life science and biotechnology, biotechnology laboratory and the equipment of this laboratory was used.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Masoumeh Fallah Ziarani], [Masoud Tohidfar] and [mohammad Navvabi]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Masoumeh Fallah Ziarani] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Tohidfar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study not used of wild plants. In this study seeds of carrot (Daucus carota L. cv. Nantaise) were prepared from Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (Karaj, Iran). After sterilization of seeds, seed cultured in ½MS medium. After two weeks were used of root, shoot, Leaf and nodal explants of plantlet. This study was conducted at shahid beheshti university, faculty of life science and biotechnology, biotechnology laboratory and all comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. In this study not used of wild plants. This study was conducted at Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Biotechnology Laboratory and all of them are in accordance with institutional, national and international guidelines and laws.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Row data in MS with 8 treatment by using 4 explants at 2 times.

Additional file 2.

Row data in 4xMS with 8 treatment by using 4 explants at 2 times.

Additional file 3.

Row data in 8xMS with 8 treatment by using 4 explants at 2 times.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fallah Ziarani, M., Tohidfar, M. & Navvabi, M. Modeling and optimizing in vitro percentage and speed callus induction of carrot via Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete GA and radial basis function. BMC Biotechnol 22, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-022-00764-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-022-00764-4

Keywords