Open Access

Novel strong promoter of antimicrobial peptides gene pro-SmAMP2 from chickweed (Stellaria media)

  • Roman A. Komakhin1Email author,
  • Denis A. Vysotskii1,
  • Rahim R. Shukurov2,
  • Vera D. Voblikova1,
  • Vera V. Komakhina1,
  • Svetlana R. Strelnikova1,
  • Ekaterina M. Vetchinkina1 and
  • Alexey V. Babakov1
BMC Biotechnology201616:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0273-x

Received: 16 November 2015

Accepted: 11 May 2016

Published: 18 May 2016

Abstract

Background

In a previous study we found that in chickweed the expression level of the pro-SmAMP2 gene was comparable or even higher to that of the β-actin gene. This high level of the gene expression has attracted our attention as an opportunity for the identification of novel strong promoters of plant origin, which could find its application in plant biotechnology. Therefore, in the present study we focused on the nucleotide sequence identification and the functional characteristics of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter in transgenic plants.

Results

In chickweed (Stellaria media), a 2120 bp promoter region of the pro-SmAMP2 gene encoding antifungal peptides was sequenced. Six 5′-deletion variants −2120, −1504, −1149, −822, −455, and −290 bp of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter were fused with the coding region of the reporter gene gusA in the plant expression vector pCambia1381Z. Independent transgenic plants of tobacco Nicotiana tabacum were obtained with each genetic structure. GUS protein activity assay in extracts from transgenic plants showed that all deletion variants of the promoter, except −290 bp, expressed the gusA gene. In most transgenic plants, the GUS activity level was comparable or higher than in plants with the viral promoter CaMV 35S. GUS activity remains high in progenies and its level correlates positively with the amount of gusA gene mRNA in T3 homozygous plants. The activity of the рro-SmAMP2 promoter was detected in all organs of the transgenic plants studied, during meiosis and in pollen as well.

Conclusion

Our results show that the рro-SmAMP2 promoter can be used for target genes expression control in transgenic plants.

Keywords

Stellaria media Nicotiana tabacum pro-SmAMP2 Promoter Expression control Transgenic plants

Background

Currently, promoters of many genes from a wide range of organisms are used in genetic engineering of plants. Promoters are traditionally divided into three types: constitutive, tissue-specific, and inducible [1]. In former times, virtually all transgenic plants contained two heterologous genes: one, a selection marker gene controlled by a constitutive promoter and the other a target gene controlled by a promoter of any type to change the plant phenotype. At present, multigene transformation allows the import of entire metabolic pathways into plants, including expression of protein complexes consisting of several target genes for the generation of transgenic plants producing multiple compounds simultaneously [2, 3]. Either a number of different promoters with similar level and profile of expression, or several copies of the same promoter must be used in one genetic construct for multigene transformation. Both approaches are complicated for a number of reasons. Firstly, there is a lack of available promoters with the necessary parameters. Secondly, the introduction of repetitive sequences in the same or different loci of a transgenic plant genome can have a negative effect on the expression and inheritance of heterologous genes due to the effect of homology-dependent gene silencing [46].

Up to now, the constitutive promoter CaMV 35S, created on the basis of shell protein 35S gene promoter region from cauliflower mosaic virus CaMV, is most widely used in vectors for genetic transformation of plants [1, 7, 8]. The CaMV 35S promoter usually provides a high expression level of heterologous genes in plants, but it has some significant drawbacks. The promoter originates from a virus and infection of transgenic plants with CaMV virus may lead to the silencing of a heterologous gene controlled by CaMV 35S [9]. In addition, the widespread use of the CaMV 35S promoter increases the probability to inactivate expression of heterologous genes under its control as a result of the homologous recombination [10, 11].

In addition to CaMV 35S, a number of other viral promoters are used for plant biotechnology (see the review by Porto et al. [8]). Recently, a highly efficient promoter was created from individual parts of different viral promoters [12, 13]. Such a widespread use of viral promoters is in part due to the lack of well-characterized strong plant gene promoters, particularly from dicotyledons.

For monocotyledonous plants, strong promoters are known, such as Act1 and ZmUbi, which are already used in crop plant genetic engineering for quite a long time [1416]. Recently, several strong and constitutive promoters APX, PGD1 and R1G1B from rice (Oryza sativa) were proposed for biotechnology of the same plant, which performed significantly better than the previously studied promoters Act1 and ZmUbi [17]. Strong and constitutive promoters of ubiquitin genes RUB2 from O. sativa and UBI10 from Brachypodium distachyon were characterized and demonstrated to exceed CaMV 35S in activity up to 35-fold in transgenic monocotyledonous plants [18, 19].

At the same time, a number of strong and constitutive promoters were cloned for genetic engineering of dicotyledonous plants, but they not perform as well as those from the monocots described above. The promoters of UBQ1 and UBQ6 genes from Arabidopsis thaliana are active in all tissues of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) at the level of viral CaMV 35S promoter [20]. Quantification of promoter strength using transient expression in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) cotyledonary tissue showed that Gmubi and GmScream promoters from soybean (Glycine max Merr.) yielded from 2 to 7-fold higher expression than a standard CaMV 35S promoter [21, 22]. The promoter of the acetolactate synthase ALS3 gene from cabbage (Brassica oleracea) is constitutive and comparable in efficiency to CaMV 35S [23]. Use of the strong constitutive promoter MtHP from Medicago truncatula to drive gus expression in Arabidopsis, showed around 50 % higher GUS activity as compared to the CaMV 35S promoter. The activity of this promoter in transgenic plants of clover (Trifolium repens) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) was 1.75 and 1.4 times higher than that of CaMV 35S, respectively [24]. The promoter of ACC-synthase VR-ACS1 gene from mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) demonstrated greater efficiency producing up to 6 times higher activity of the reporter proteins in transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis, compared to the CaMV 35S [25]. The apparent superiority of the VR-ACS1 promoter over the viral one was not only the result of transcriptional activation but also of more efficient translation.

Despite the abundance of literature on the use of plant promoters in plant biotechnology, the lack of effective promoters for high expression of target genes still exists.

In this study we focused on another group of plant genes that can be a source of effective promoters. When studying antifungal peptides of chickweed (Stellaria media), we found that the expression of their genes pro-SmAMP1 and pro-SmAMP2 is high and that it increases when S. media is treated by the elicitor methyl jasmonate or infected by pathogenic fungi [26]. The pro-SmAMP1 gene expression increased from 10 to 70 times reaching the level of the chickweed house-keeping gene β-actin. The expression of the other gene, pro-SmAMP2, is rather constitutive because its activity does not change so much under the influence of the above factors (2–5 times). At the same time its normal level of activity was unusually high in different organs (stem, leaves, roots, flowers), comparable or superior to the level of β-actin expression.

The high expression level of pro-SmAMP2 gene indicates that this gene has a strong promoter, which may be of interest for application in plant biotechnology. For that reason, we identified the promoter sequence and studied the properties of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter.

Results

Cloning the nucleotide sequence of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region and production of genetic constructs for plant transformation

As a result of “genome walking”, a 2400 bp target fragment of S. media genome was amplified. Its sequencing showed that the fragment includes part of the coding sequence of the pro-SmAMP2 gene and 2160 bp 5′-flanking region from the translation start site (ATG codon) including 40 bp of pro-SmAMP2 gene 5′-UTR. The nucleotide sequence including the expected promoter region was analyzed by programs PLACE [27, 28] and PlantCARE [29], which revealed some regulatory motifs previously found in most eukaryotic promoters (Fig. 1 and Table 1). For instance, the following sequence features were found: one W box, four TGACG motifs, one S box, four binding sites of MYB transcription factor, TC-rich repeat, one TGA-element involved in response to auxin and one ARE element involved in response to anaerobic conditions. In addition, motifs responsible for tissue-specific gene expression or expression that is invoked in response to the light conditions are present in the nucleotide sequence of the promoter region. Amongst these, were one GCN4 motif and four Skn-1 motifs, both of which are associated with increased expression in the endosperm of seeds, one AC-I motif associated with increased expression in the xylem, one I box, two GT1 motifs and two G box elements, all related to LRE elements responsible for expression in above-ground parts and regulated by light exposure. The presence of such motifs suggests that the activity of the pro-SmAMP2 gene in chickweed plant can be regulated by the interaction of different transcription factors with the corresponding cis-elements within the promoter. Moreover, the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter contains the conservative sequence of TATA-box CATTTCCACTATATATAG, CAAT-box motif and the transcription initiation site CAN(A/C)(A/C)(C/A)C(C/A)N2A(C/A). Altogether, this analysis suggests that pro-SmAMP2 promoter is strong and potentially regulated in response to stress, as for example, pathogen attack and/or light exposure.
Fig. 1

The nucleotide sequence of 5′-flanking promoter region of pro-SmAMP2 gene and location of cis-acting elements (color-coded and labeled). Vertical arrows mark the starting points of the 5′-deletion variant nucleotide sequences. TSS is the transcription start site at −40 bp from ATG codon behind the region highlighted in red. Translation initiation site ATG +41 is labeled in italics

Table 1

Motifs detected in pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter sequence (based on the results of analysis by PLACE and PlantCARE programs)

Motif

Description

5UTR Py-rich stretch

region in the 5primeUTR conferring high transcription levels without the need for other upstream cis-elements except for a TATA-box

GCN4_motif

cis-regulatory element involved in endosperm expression

TGACG-motif, CGTCA-motif

cis-acting regulatory element involved in the MeJA-responsiveness

GT1-motif

light responsive element

ARE (anaerobic responsive element)

cis-acting regulatory element essential for the anaerobic induction

MRE

MYB binding site involved in light responsiveness

ACE

cis-acting element involved in light responsiveness

TC-rich repeats

cis-acting element involved in defense and stress responsiveness

Skn-1_motif

cis-acting regulatory element required for endosperm expression

MBS

MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility

G-box

cis-acting regulatory element involved in light responsiveness

AC-I

element involved in negative regulation on phloem expression; and responsible for restricting the vascular expression to the xylem

TCA-element

cis-acting element involved in salicylic acid responsiveness

I box

part of a light responsive element

TGA-element

auxin-responsive element

W-box

wounding and pathogen elicitor response

S box

wounding and pathogen elicitor response

CAAT-box

common cis-acting element in promoter and enhancer regions

TATA-box

core promoter element around −30 of transcription start

The sequence of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter region shown in Fig. 1 also includes the 5′-UTR of pro-SmAMP2 gene, which was only 40 bp in the 5′ direction from the translation initiation site ATG.

In order to study the properties of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter related to the expression of genes in heterologous systems, six genetic constructs, containing various 5′-deletion variants of the promoter region with 5′UTR, were obtained (see Methods and Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

The scheme of constructs with deletion variants of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region designed on basis of plant expression vector pCambia 1381Z for analysis of gus reporter gene expression. Plant expression vector pMOG-35SintGUS containing CaMV 35S viral promoter was used as a control. The translated region of gus gene is colored black; Int - modified castor bean catalase intron within the translated region of gus gene; PIV2 - modified potato ST-LS1 gene intron within the translated region of gus gene. Promoters are depicted as arrows with the appropriate signatures

Deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter region were chosen in such a way that the location of cis-regulatory elements in the nucleotide sequence was taken into account. The plasmid pMOG-35SintGus, in which the gus gene is controlled by the CaMV 35S viral promoter, was used as a positive control. In the vectors, modified castor bean catalase intron or ST-LS1 gene intron was placed within the sequence of the gus gene (Fig. 2) to prevent the influence of Agrobacterium contamination on the results of GUS activity measurements in transformed plants.

Pro-smAMP2 promoter yields higher GUS activity in T0 transgenic tobacco plants than the CaMV 35S promoter

After Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, independent T0 tobacco plants, each taken from individual calli, were selected in the following number: T0p2120 - 10 plants, T0p1504 - 9 plants, T0p1149 - 12 plants, T0p822 - 13 plants, T0p455 - 8 plants, T0p290 - 22 plants, and control Т0pMOG-35SintGus - 15 plants. Estimation of the GUS activity in protein extracts from leaves of aseptic transgenic plants showed that all deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter except −290 bp (Additional file 1: Table S1) expressed the gus gene.

In most transgenic plants from groups T0p1504, T0p1149, T0p822 and T0p455, the GUS activity ranged from 2 to 20 nmol/mg · min. This was several times higher than the GUS activity measured in the control plants Т0pMOG-35SintGus, ranging from 0.2 to 1.8 nmol/mg · min (Fig. 3a). The level of GUS activity in T0p2120 plants was comparable to plants expressing gus under the control of CaMV 35S promoter, and did not exceed 1.8 nmol/mg · min (Fig. 3a). Differences in GUS activity levels amongst independent primary transformants of different constructs is most probably due to the integration of multiple T-DNA copies into their genome or chimerism.
Fig. 3

The GUS activity in tobacco transformants T0. a Plants were growing under aseptic conditions 1.5 months after rooting on the medium with a selective agent. The average values of activity from three mature leaves of each transformant ± SE (the standard error) are presented. b Plants were grown for six weeks in soil after being transplanted from aseptic conditions. The average activity values of three samples from one leaf of each transformant ± SE are presented

Similar to the measurements in aseptic plants, GUS enzymatic activity was analyzed in the tobacco leaves of T0 plants, grown in soil. First, Fig. 3b shows that the maximum levels of GUS activity in leaves of T0 transgenic tobacco plants grown in the soil were notably higher than the values obtained for the same plants under aseptic conditions. On average, GUS activity values of 180 nmol/mg · min in T0p2120, 150 nmol/mg · min in T0p1504, 70 nmol/mg · min in T0p1149, 84 nmol/mg · min in T0p822, and 31 nmol/mg · min in T0p455 were observed. However, a 5 to 10-fold difference was detected between some of the individual Т0p1504, Т0p1149 and Т0p822 plants. Secondly, unlike under aseptic conditions, in average, the highest GUS activity of plants grown in soil was observed in T0p2120 plants. Thirdly, decreasing the length of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter resulted in a decrease in GUS activity. In the CaMV 35S plants the average GUS activity was not higher than 1.2 nmol/mg . min. It should be noted that the GUS activity of the Т0pMOG-35SintGus plants grown in soil was also slightly (1.5 to 2-fold) higher than in the aseptically grown plants.

The highest levels of GUS activity was measured in leaves of tobacco plants Т0p2120 (5 transformants), Т0p1504 (2 transformants), Т0p1149 (2 transformants), Т0p822 (2 transformants) and Т0p455 (5 transformants) growing in soil (Fig. 3b). GUS activity in the adventitious roots and flowers of the same plants was less than 20 % of the activity in leaves and ranged 2 to 5-fold between samples of one transgene version. GUS activity in stems of individual primary transformants Т0p455 (young sprouts 8–10 cm long) could be at the level of activity in leaves but it varied 2 to 4-fold from plant to plant. GUS activity in stems of other transgenic lines Т0p2120, Т0p1504, Т0p1149 and Т0p822 was not higher than 25 % of activity in leaves and it also varied greatly from plant to plant (Additional file 2: Fig. S1).

Pro-SmAMP2 promoter retains its activity in the progeny of T1-T3 transgenic plants

The level of GUS activity in the progeny of T0 transgenic plants was studied to characterize the properties of pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants across the generations. For that, seeds of T1 from five transgenic tobacco plants of each group Т0p2120, Т0p1504, Т0p1149, Т0p822 and Т0p455 expressing gus gene were produced by self-pollination. At least 200 seeds from each T0 plant representing one population were aseptically planted on selective medium containing the antibioticum hygromycin. After 4 weeks of selection, segregation of plants into the subpopulations of transgenic T1 (green) and non-transgenic (whitened) was analyzed. In some populations from groups T1p2120, T1p1504, T1p1149, T1p822 and T1p455, a segregation ratio of 3:1 between green and white plants was confirmed using the Chi-square criterion which is consistent with the presence of T-DNA at a single locus of the genome. These results, however, do not allow an estimate of the number of T-DNA repeats at such insertion locus.

In some T1 populations the segregation ratio was different from monogenic being equal to 2:1, probably as a result of elimination of one transgenic class. There were also T1 populations with a segregation ratio of 15:1, which suggests the presence of T-DNA in two unlinked loci of the ancestral T0 plant genome.

Enzymatic activity of GUS protein was studied in T1 plants with all deletion variants T1p2120, T1p1504, T1p1149, T1p822 and T1p455 to determine the level of the reporter gene gus expression. As shown in Fig. 4a, high GUS activity was still present in T1 transgenic tobacco plants carrying all deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter. Two-fold difference in levels of GUS activity between individual transgenic plants from the same T1 population with monogenic segregation observed in all variants most probably resulted from their T-DNA locus being homo- or heterozygotic (Fig. 4a). The difference in GUS activity between different populations with monogenic inheritance of T1p1149, T1p822 and T1p455 T-DNA could result from the integration of two T-DNA copies into one chromosome locus or from the positional effect of T-DNA insertion (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4

The GUS activity in leaves of transgenic tobacco plants from three consecutive generations (T1, T2, T3) measured in six weeks of growth in soil after transplanting from aseptic conditions. The average activity values of three samples from one leaf of each transformant ± SE are presented. The average activity among the plants of one population ± confidence interval (p = 5 %) are shown as gray bars. a T1. b T2. c T3

The GUS activity level was significantly lower in all T1 transgenic plants compared to the progenitor T0 plants. The highest reduction (more than 25-fold) was observed in the Т1р2120 plants. The activity decreased 8- to 11-fold in T1p1504, T1p1149, T1p822, and 3 to 5-fold in Т1p455 plants. Thus, the longer the nucleotide sequence of the promoter deletion variant, the greater the reduction in GUS activity in T1 plants compared to the progenitor T0 plants.

Nevertheless, even the level of GUS activity in transgenic T1 plants of the efficient deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter region was equal to or several times higher than the activity achieved with the CaMV 35S promoter (0.9-3.3 nmol/mg . min in [12, 30] and 10 nmol/mg . min in [25]).

For T2 generation studies, only transgenic plants with the longest −2120 bp and the shortest −455 bp deletion variants of pro-SmAMP2 promoter were used. High GUS activity was preserved in transgenic tobacco plants of T2 generation with deletion variants −2120 and −455 bp of pro-SmAMP2 promoter (Fig. 4b). In two independent Т2p2120 populations, No. 8–2 and No. 19–1, all transgenic plants were resistant to the selective agent hygromycin and did not differ significantly in the level of GUS activity from each other, what indicates that they are homozygous for the T-DNA locus. The average GUS activity level in the population No. 19–1 and No. 8–2 was 9.0 ± 0.4 nmol/mg . min and 10.9 ± 1.7 nmol/mg . min respectively, which corresponds to the activity in their parent T1 plants (Fig. 4a).

Unlike transgenic plants Т2p455 No. 14–3, all of which were resistant to hygromycin, the plant population No. 10–8 segregated in the ratio of 3:1 for resistance to hygromycin (Fig. 4b). These results show that plants of Т2p455 population No. 10–8 were obtained from T1 generation plants hemizygous for T-DNA locus. The average level of activity in plants of the population No. 14–3 was about 17.4 ± 1.8 nmol/mg · min, that is about 1.3 times higher than the average level in the population Т2p455 No. 10–8, being 13.1 ± 2.7 nmol/mg · min (Fig. 4b). At the same time, activity levels were close in plants Т2p455 No. 14–3 and in two plants from populations No. 10–8 with the highest activity, which, as we assume, were homozygous for T-DNA loci. In order to confirm this we produced and analyzed T3 generation. Two plants with GUS activity 2-fold higher than the other plants from the population Т2p455 No. 10–8 were used to generate T3 (Fig. 4b).

High GUS activity was preserved in T3 generation transgenic tobacco plants on the level of their parent plants T2 with pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants −2120 and −455 bp (Fig. 4b and с). All transgenic plants were resistant to hygromycin and had comparable level of GUS activity in individual plants, which suggested their homozygous state for T-DNA loci. The average level of GUS activity in T3p455 populations was as high as 19.6 ± 1.6 nmol/mg · min in No. 14-3-3, 20.3 ± 2.4 in No. 14-3-7, 20.7 ± 3.0 in No. 10-8-9 and 21.1 ± 2.8 in No. 10-8-10. The average level of GUS activity in T3p2120 populations was 11.5 ± 1.2 nmol/mg · min in No. 8-2-2, 10.8 ± 1.2 in No. 8-2-3, 11.1 ± 0.8 in No. 19-1-2 and 9.9 ± 1.1 in No. 19-1-10.

Southern blotting analysis showed that Т3p2120 plants from population No. 8-2-2 and Т3p455 plants from population No. 14-3-3 contain T-DNA insertion at one genomic locus (Fig. 5). Consequently, GUS activity levels achieved in these plants was provided by a single locus T-DNA insertion.
Fig. 5

Southern blotting analysis of total DNA from leaves of two plants Т3p2120 No. 8-2-2 (lanes 1 and 2) and Т3p455 No. 14-3-3 (lanes 3 and 4) restricted with EcoRI. “C-“- total DNA from leaves of non-transgenic tobacco plants restricted with EcoRI. M - marker (Fermentas, #Sm333). “C+” - plasmid pMOG-35SintGus restricted with HindIII. The 740 bp fragment of gus gene was used as probe

GUS activity changes during vegetative period in homozygous T3 lines with pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants −2120 and −455 bp under different light conditions

In previous experiments, the level of GUS activity was measured in transgenic plants of T1-T3 generations at the age of approximately 70 days. However, the dynamics of GUS activity in leaves of homozygous transgenic plants during the growth season is not known. In addition, the effect of the length of the light period on pro-SmAMP2 promoter activity in heterologous plants was also not clear. As the pro-SmAMP2 promoter contains regulatory elements potentially able to change its activity in dependence of the light condition (Fig. 1 and Table 1), we studied GUS activity under different light regimes.

For this purpose, homozygous tobacco plants from transgenic lines Т3p2120 (No. 8-2-2 and No. 19-1-2) and Т3p455 (No. 14-3-3 and No. 10-8-9), were grown at short and long day, bypassing the selection stage on the medium with hygromycin. Data from Fig. 6 suggest that GUS activity was higher under long-day (16/8 h) than under short-day (12/12 h) condition on days 51, 58, 72 and 80 in Т3p2120 plants, and from day 51 to 65 in Т3p455 plants. However, these differences were not significant (p = 5 %), except for day 72 in Т3p2120.
Fig. 6

The GUS activity in the leaves of T3 generation homozygous transgenic tobacco plants grown in soil from seeds. Eight plants were studied under long day (16/8 h) and six plants under short day (12/12 h) conditions for both variants T3p2120 and T3p455. The average levels of GUS activity in adjacent leaves from medium tiers ± SE are presented

Under long-day condition, GUS activity level was at least 1.5 times higher (p = 5 %) in Т3p455 than in Т3p2120 plants for the entire observation period (Fig. 6). The same trend was detected under short-day condition, except days 37 and 65 when the differences between Т3p455 and Т3p2120 were not significant (p = 5 %).

Figure 6 also shows that a GUS activity of 9–11 nmol/mg · min in Т3p2120 and 16–19 nmol/mg · min in Т3p455 plants, grown in the soil directly from seed, was reached on day 51, but not on day 70 as was observed for those plants, selected on the medium with hygromycin (Fig. 4с). In the subsequent days, GUS activity increased and reached on day 80 22–29 nmol/mg · min in Т3p2120 and 53–54 nmol/mg · min in Т3p455 (Fig. 6). In plants with the pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variant −455 bp, GUS activity on day 80 was comparable to that previously measured in the primary transformants growing in soil (Fig. 3b). Measurements on day 87 showed that GUS activity decreased: more in Т3p2120 and less in Т3p455 plants (Fig. 6).

GUS activity correlates with the content of gus gene mRNA in transgenic plants T3p2120 and T3p455

The results of real-time PCR measurement of gus gene expression relative to the actin reference gene of tobacco are shown in Fig. 7a. It can be concluded from the data that: 1) gus expression was higher than actin gene expression in almost all transgenic plants, and 2) on average, gus gene mRNA content was two times higher in the samples from T3p455 than from T3p2120 plants.
Fig. 7

Gus gene expression in leaves of T3p2120 and T3p455 tobacco plants measured by real-time PCR. a Gus gene expression normalized to the expression of actin gene. Average values for individual transgenic plants ± SE are presented as gray bars. For transgenic variants, the average values ± confidence interval (p = 5 %) are presented as black bars. b The dependence of GUS activity level on gus gene expression. Correlation coefficients (r) and regression coefficients (b) ± SE are shown

Strong positive correlation (r = 0.9 ± 0.11) between GUS activity levels and gus gene mRNA expression was shown in the leaves of T3p455 and T3p2120 plant variants analyzed together as a pooled set (Fig. 7b). The correlation coefficient for T3p455 plants taken separately (r 455  = 0.76 ± 0.26) also supported the strong relationship between gus gene mRNA content and the activity of its protein product, while the correlation was not that strong in the T3p2120 variant (r 2120  = 0.44 ± 0.36).

When analyzed in a pooled group, activity of the GUS protein per unit of gus gene mRNA changed linearly with a regression coefficient of b = 2.37 ± 0.30 (Fig. 7b). This parameter did not differ significantly between separate T3p455 (b 455  = 2.44 ± 0.85) and T3p2120 (b 2120  = 1.0 ± 0.84) groups due to large statistical variation.

Pro-SmAMP2 promoter is active in different organs and at different stages of T3p2120 and T3p455 development

Staining showed that activity of both pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants is present in leaves, stems, roots, buds, anthers, microsporocytes and pollen. Particularly intense staining was noted in the hypocotyl of all transgenic plants, which indicates a higher activity of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter region in this part of a plant (Fig. 8a). The least intense staining of leaves present in transgenes was typical for the youngest apical ones.
Fig. 8

The GUS activity in different organs of Т3р2120 (line No. 8-2-2) and Т3p455 (line No. 10-8-9) transgenic tobacco plants at various stages of their development. a Roots, stems, and leaves at the age of 2 weeks after transplanting from aseptic conditions, (b) bud, (c) anthers, (d) microsporocytes, additionally stained by acetocarmine, (e) pollen

Histochemical analysis allowed us to conclude that the pro-SmAMP2 promoter is active not only in plant cells at the stage of sporophyte but also during meiosis and at the stage of gametophyte, as GUS activity was detected in the microsporocytes and pollen (Fig. 8d, f).

At the same time, a high level of GUS activity in all studied organs and cells of transgenic plants did not allow to visually identify differences between the T3p2120 and T3p455 variants. Moreover, in some transgenic plant samples subjected to the histochemical analysis, products of X-Gluc substrate hydrolysis stained not only the plants themselves but also the incubation solutions, that indicates that the levels of GUS protein in these samples is very high. It was also noted that if the plant tissue was damaged, solution staining was more intense.

Quantitative method of GUS activity assay using 4MUG substrate was used for comparative analysis of pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants activity in T3 seeds obtained from T2p2120 and T2p455 tobacco plants. The activity from 1.2 to 19.8 nmol/mg . min was detected in T3 seeds, but it varied strongly even between plants from the same line. This finding was quite surprising, because in chickweed plants, the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter ensures the accumulation of antifungal peptides SmAMP1.1a and SmAMP2.2a in seeds [26].

Discussion

In previous studies, we established that pro-SmAMP2 gene expression in chickweed was at a very high level comparable with the level of actin gene expression, and the highest values were observed in the roots and flowers of plants [26]. In addition, pro-SmAMP2 gene expression in aseptic chickweed plants increased from two to five times due to the contact with phytopathogenic fungi, as well as after methyl jasmonate treatment. The combination of these results suggests that the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter is strong, slightly inducible and organ-specific in chickweed. The properties of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region in chickweed plant are determined by two factors, namely, the presence of specific regulatory elements in its nucleotide sequence, as well as the presence and activity of respective transcription factors within the plant cells.

It is known that the promoters of PR-protein genes are usually strong [24], and the location of specific motifs such as CATTTCCACTATATATAG, CAAT-box, CATAAACATAAAC in the promoter core segment confirms this. Such motifs are found in promoters of plant genes with high expression level [31]. The nucleotide sequence of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region contains conserved elements of TATA-box, CAAT-box motif and the sequence of transcription initiation site (Fig. 1). In addition, the promoter also contains some less conserved elements which may serve to fine-tune gene expression in tissues, organs or in response to different stimuli (Table 1). Among the latter ones there are probably cis-regulatory elements that ensure the activation of pro-SmAMP2 gene expression in aseptic chickweed plant after fungal infection or methyl jasmonate treatment.

Analysis of gus reporter gene expression under the control of various deletion variants of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter in aseptic transgenic tobacco plants allowed to identify the minimum length of −455 bp retaining promoter activity. The shorter deletion variant −290 bp did not show any activity in heterologous plants, despite the fact that they contained a TATA-box and CAAT-box. The loss of activity may be associated with the deletion of the GT1 motif located in the area from −455 to 290 bp (Fig. 1) which is necessary for the initiation and stabilization of the transcription complex TFIIA-TBP-TATA [32]. It is unlikely that the loss of another cis-element Skn1 located in the same area of promoter sequence causes inactivation of the promoter transcriptional activity, because this regulatory element is associated with storage protein gene expression in the endosperm of a seed but not in leaves [33].

The present study was performed using the strong and constitutive viral promoter CaMV 35S as a control. With this promoter, the level of GUS activity was below 1.8 nmol/mg.min in individual transformants of tobacco cultivar Samsun NN (Fig. 3). In general, this activity level is comparable with the results of other studies which reported the GUS activities of 0.9–3.3 nmol/mg · min in individual transgenic lines of Samsun NN or Xanthi tobacco cultivars [12, 30]. Meanwhile, there are studies which provide experimental data demonstrating GUS activity as high as 10 nmol/mg · min under CaMV 35S promoter in some tobacco lines [25]. It is known that the level of GUS activity is highly variable in transgenic tobacco plants when using the CaMV 35S promoter which probably depends on the promoter version or measurement conditions. Anyway, GUS activity level with CaMV 35S promoter demonstrated in those studies that the CaMV 35S promoter can be used as a reference to compare our results with the data of other published research.

In aseptic tobacco plants, deletion variants of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region −1504, −1149 and −455 bp, but not −2120 bp, provided a significantly higher activity of the reporter protein than known viral CaMV 35S promoter (Fig. 3a). These results suggest that the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter will be strong in dicotyledonous plants in case of stable integration into the genome. It was surprising that the longest pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variant −2120 bp was inferior to the other deletion variants and did not differ from CaMV 35S promoter in efficiency. This suggests that in the segment from −2120 to 1504 bp of pro-SmAMP2 promoter region, there are regulatory elements acting negatively in aseptic tobacco plants. Likely candidates could be three TGACG motifs, which are responsible for gene expression effects of methyl jasmonate in barley Hordeum vulgare [34], and GT1 motif capable of affecting gene expression in both positive and negative way [35].

It was quite unexpected to observe an increase of GUS activity in transgenic T0 tobacco plants after their transplantation into soil (Fig. 3), and this effect was most prominent in the T0p2120 plants, but less pronounced and comparable in magnitude in T0p1504, T0p1149, and T0p822. In T0p455 plants, the increase in GUS activity was also noted, but compared to the other groups it was very small and only slightly higher than under viral promoter CaMV 35S. Based on these findings, we assume that the effect of expression induction could be mainly the result of the cumulative effect of TGACG elements [34], partly W box [36] and S box [37] cis-elements involved in the response to elicitors of pathogenic fungi. Association of soil microorganisms could act as inductor of pro-SmAMP2 promoter region in transgenic tobacco plants in the conditions of greenhouse.

Previously, we have shown that the pro-SmAMP2 gene has the highest expression level in roots and flowers in chickweed plants [26]. However, in transgenic tobacco T0p1504, T0p1149, T0p822, and T0p455, the highest GUS activity was observed in the leaves. This may be the result of formerly described cooperative interaction of cis-elements GT1 and I box (GATA-type light regulatory element), which are present in the core part of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter, in response to light [3841]. As tobacco plant leaves have larger surface area for light absorption than other organs, the maximum effect from GT1 and GATA motifs appeared, apparently, in them. Noteworthy, it has been demonstrated that the presence of GT element leads in some cases to the gene suppression in non-photosynthetic organs of plants [35], which correlates with our data, since GUS activity in roots of transgenic tobacco plants was significantly lower than in the above-ground parts.

The relatively high level of GUS activity was preserved in T1 transgenic tobacco plants with all deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter region (Fig. 4a). However, the absolute values of GUS activity were significantly reduced in all groups, except T1p455, and the values were closer to the level of GUS activity in T0 aseptic plants (compare Fig. 3b and 4a). The most dramatic decrease of activity was observed in variant T1p2120, whereas the reduction was less pronounced and comparable between T1p1504, T1p1149, and T1p822. The reason for the above activity changes is not clear; however, a certain similarity of this result with the above-described induction of gus expression in plants T0p2120, T0p1504, T0p1149, and T0p822 in the soil (Fig. 3b) suggests that the reduction in GUS activity may be associated with TGACG cis-elements involved in the response to methyl jasmonate [34].

Nevertheless, the pro-SmAMP2 promoter efficiency in the progeny of transgenic T1 tobacco plants was comparable to the efficiency of the viral promoter CaMV S35, which can induce GUS activity in transgenic tobacco plants as high as 0.9–10.0 nmol/mg · min according to published data [12, 25, 30].

High GUS activity was preserved on the level of their parent plants in transgenic tobacco plants of generations T2 and T3 transformed by pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants −2120 and −455 bp (Fig. 4b and с). Individual T3 transgenic plants did not segregate on the selective medium with hygromycin and had a comparable level of GUS activity within individual populations, which suggests their homozygosity by T-DNA loci. The average level of GUS activity in all populations of Т3p455 was about 20 nmol/mg · min which was approximately two times higher than the activity in Т3p2120 (Fig. 4b and с). These results imply the presence of cis-elements in the region from −455 to 2120 bp of pro-SmAMP2 promoter which reduce promoter activity in tobacco plants. At the same time, it is possible that these cis-elements may contribute to the induction of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter in response to certain inducers; however, we failed to identify the inducers.

In homozygous transgenic tobacco plants T3p2120 and T3p455 grown from seed in the soil, the pro-SmAMP2 promoter led to accumulation of the GUS reporter protein during the vegetative period from day 30 to 87 (Fig. 6). In T3p455 plants, but not in T3p2120, GUS activity on day 80 reached the level detected earlier in the primary transformants grown in the soil (Fig. 3b and 6). These results confirm the assumption that negatively acting cis-elements are present in the pro-SmAMP2 promoter sequence region from 2120 to 455 bp.

More daylight hours led to increased GUS accumulation in both T3p455 and T3p2120 plants, which implies that pro-SmAMP2 promoter activity positively depends on the duration of illumination. This was expected, since its nucleotide sequence contains cis-elements able to react to changes in the duration of the light period (Fig. 1 and Table 1). It should be noted that the CaMV 35S viral promoter in transgenic tobacco plants, on the contrary, had higher activity under short day condition (8/16 h) than under long day (16/8 h) [30].

Overall, we see that in successive generations, the T1-T3 GUS activity in transgenic tobacco plants with the shortest deletion variant −455 bp of pro-SmAMP2 promoter was approximately 1.5 to 2-fold higher than in plants with the longest deletion variant of the promoter.

Quantitative measurement of gus mRNA showed that its level is much higher than the expression of the tobacco actin gene in many lines of T3 transgenic plants. The shorter deletion variant −455 bp of pro-SmAMP2 promoter produced 2-fold higher expression level of gus mRNA than the longest deletion variant (Fig. 7a), what correlates with the GUS activity. This positive correlation between gus gene expression level and the activity of its protein product GUS (Fig. 7b) confirms that high GUS activity in transgenic tobacco plants T3p2120 and T3p455 is primarily related to the reporter gene transcription, but not to the translation of its mRNA, as was the case with VR-ACS1 gene promoter from Vigna radiata L. [25]. It should be noted that all deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter include its own 40 nucleotide long 5′UTR (Fig. 1). It is quite possible that it positively affects the stability of gus mRNA, but in order to make this assertion more research is needed.

The regression coefficient b = 2.37 ± 0.30 was obtained for GUS activity per mRNA level unit calculated for all the transgenic tobacco plants on day 58 when grown under long-day condition (Fig. 7b), that indicates the process of intensive accumulation of GUS reporter protein. This assumption is supported by the dynamics of GUS activity in transgenic plants which is also intensively increasing from day 42 to 80 (Fig. 6). The active form of the GUS protein in plants is characterized by a long half-life time [42]. Therefore, the process of high accumulation of GUS protein in transgenic plants T3p2120 and T3p455 may be explained not only by transcriptional activity of pro-SmAMP2 promoter but also by the integral effect of GUS accumulation.

In Fig. 8, it is demonstrated that the activity of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter deletion variants −2120 and −455 bp, which are most different in length, is present in leaves, stems, roots, buds, anthers, microsporocytes and pollen of T3 transgenic plants. Particularly intense staining by the products of substrate X-Gluc hydrolysis was noted in the region of hypocotyl (Fig. 8a), suggesting increased activity of the pro-SmAMP2 promoter in this part of the plant. These results can be helpful when creating transgenic plants resistant to pathogens that damage crops in the region of the hypocotyl (for example, tomatoes and flax).

GUS activity in seeds of the studied plants varied greatly, probably due to inactivation of GUS enzymatic activity during storage or due to seed dehydration. It should be noted that even in plants of the same line seeds were ripening with a 1 to 3 weeks difference.

Conclusion

From the results obtained with transgenic tobacco plants, we have concluded that the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter is strong, and its most promising deletion variant for target gene expression in plants is a variant of −455 bp length. Given the high level of gus expression in transgenic tobacco plants under control of this promoter and the high level of pro-SmAMP2 gene expression in S. media plants [26], it is expected that the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter will retain high activity in other dicotyledonous plants.

Methods

Cloning nucleotide sequence of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region from chickweed S. media

The seeds of S. media plant were collected in Central Russia. Genomic DNA extracted from leaves by GenElute Plant Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma, USA) was used as the source of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region.

The nucleotide sequence of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter was determined using the method of “genome walking”. This was done using Genome Walker Universal Kit (Clontech Laboratories Inc., USA) and two antisense primers 1 and 2 specific for pro-SmAMP2 gene sequence (Additional file 1: Table S2).

The target nucleotide sequence was amplified by two-step PCR according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The PCR product 2400 bp long was cloned in the vector pGEM-T (Promega, USA) and sequenced.

Producing genetic constructs for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation

The first nucleotide of the transcription start site (TSS) was designated as +1. Deletion variants of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region −2120, −1504, −1149, −822, −455 and −290 bp with 5′UTR (40 bp) were obtained (Fig. 1) using the reverse primer 3 and the corresponding direct primers 4–9 (Additional file 1: Table S2). For convenience of cloning, reverse primer 3 contained the sequence of the restriction site NcoI at its 5′-end, and direct primers 4–9 contained EcoRI site.

To prevent polymerase errors, PCR amplification was carried out with a mixture of Pfu (SibEnzyme, Russia) and Taq (Syntol, Russia) DNA polymerases in the ratio of 1:10 in the standard reaction buffer for thermostable polymerase (60 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5 at 25 °C); 1.5 mM MgCl2; 25 mM KCl; 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; 0.1 % Triton X-100) with dNTPs. The previously obtained 2400 bp fragment of the pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region was used as DNA template. Amplification profile: denaturation 94 °C, 30 s; primer annealing 60 °C, 40 s; elongation 72 °C, 2 min; 25 cycles.

Plasmid genetic constructs for plant transformation containing the reporter gene gus controlled by the deletion variants of pro-SmAMP2 gene promoter region were obtained by merging DNA fragments with the coding region of the reporter gene gusA in the plasmid pCambia1381Z (Cambia, Australia). For this purpose, PCR amplicons were purified, treated with the appropriate restriction enzymes and ligated into plasmid pCambia1381Z at the restriction sites NcoI and EcoRI. All genetic constructs obtained were verified by sequencing and designated, respectively, p2120, p1504, p1149, p822, p445 and p290. As a control, plasmid pMOG-35SintGus was used in which gus reporter gene is placed under control of the viral promoter CaMV 35S [43].

Agrobacterial strains for plant transformation

Plant expression vectors p2120, p1504, p1149, p822, p445, p290 and pMOG-35SintGus were introduced into cells of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL0 by electroporation. Agrobacterial transformants containing plant expression vectors were selected on agar LB medium with the addition of antibiotics kanamycin (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA) and rifampicin (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA) at a concentration of 100 mg/L each. For plant transformation, Agrobacterium strains were grown in LB liquid medium with rifampicin (100 mg/L) and kanamycin (100 mg/L) for 20 h at 27 °C and 180 rpm.

Obtaining T0 generation transgenic plants

Tobacco plants Nicotiana tabacum cultivar Samsun NN were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Regenerants were produced according to previously published methodology [26]. The antibiotic timentin (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA) was used at a concentration of 300 mg/L for elimination of agrobacteria. For selection of regenerants transformed by plant expression vectors p2120, p1504, p1149, p822, p445 and p290, hygromycin (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA) in a concentration of 50 mg/L was used; for those transformed by the plasmid pMOG-35SintGUS, kanamycin was used (100 mg/L). The regenerants were designated according to the genetic structure used for transformation. Aseptic tobacco plants were grown at 23 °C, illumination 7 klx and photoperiod 16/8 h, then they were adapted to the soil within 3 days and were grown in the greenhouse at 26 °C, illumination 11 klx and 16/8 h photoperiod, unless otherwise stated.

Obtaining T1–T3 generation transgenic plants

Seeds of T1-T3 were obtained by self-pollination of tobacco plants from preceding generations without obvious morphological abnormalities, demonstrating the expression of gus reporter gene and capability of seed formation. Seeds from each self-pollinated plant were collected separately, sterilized and selected on Murashige-Skoog medium [44] with hygromycin (50 mg/L) for 4 weeks. After selection was done, segregation analysis of plants into green and white phenotype was performed using Chi-square criterion. Green plants were adapted to the soil within 3 days, and were grown in the greenhouse at 26 °C, illumination 11 klx and the photoperiod 16/8 h.

To obtain homozygous plants of T2 generation, the T1 plants from populations with monogenic inheritance of transgenes were used to avoid the influence of the number of independent T-DNA insertions on GUS activity level. Plants with activity level approximately two times higher than in other plants of the same population were selected as the parent T1 plants, which suggested their homozygosity by T-DNA loci. The homozygous T3 plants were obtained on the same way.

Quantitation of the reporter protein beta-glucuronidase (GUS) activity

GUS activity was measured in extracts of tobacco plants according to the method by Jefferson et al. [45]. Three tissue samples were analyzed from each individual transgenic plant. To obtain protein extracts, plant tissue samples (about 10–20 mg) were homogenized in 150 μL of extraction buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 7.0); 10 mM EDTA; 0.1 % Triton X-100; 0.1 % (w/v) sodium laurylsarcosine; 10 mM beta-mercaptoethanol), centrifuged 10 min at 15.000 rpm, 4 °C. Next, 100 μL of supernatant was collected and re-centrifuged under the same conditions, and 70 μL of the supernatant was taken for analysis. The samples obtained were stored frozen at minus 70 °C.

GUS activity was measured for 30 min at 37 °C in 100 μL of extraction buffer with 4-methylumbelliferyl-D-glucuronide (4MUG) (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA) at a final concentration of 1 mM. The reaction was stopped by adding 900 μL of 0.2 M Na2CO3. Fluorescence was excited at 365 nm and measured at 455 nm (Perkin Elmer LS55, USA). Calibration of fluorescence was performed using a solution of 4-methylumbelliferone (4MU) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in 0.2 M Na2CO3. GUS activity was calculated after determining the concentration of protein in extracts by Bradford [46] using a solution of bovine serum albumin as standard. The results of GUS activity measurement from each individual transgenic plant are presented as average value from three tissue samples ± SE.

Each aseptic tobacco T0 regenerant was analyzed in 1.5 months after rooting the plant on the medium with a selective agent, immediately before planting in soil. Each T0-T3 transgenic tobacco plant was analyzed 6 weeks after transplanting from aseptic conditions into the soil. Mature leaves (about 20 cm) from medium level were used for the analysis. One 10–12 mg cutting was taken to measure GUS activity in the leaves. Fragments of sprout stems (8–10 cm) with a diameter of about 1 cm (15–20 mg) were used for GUS activity analysis in the stems of tobacco plants. GUS activity was analyzed in the flowers of tobacco plants during abundant flowering, entire flower was used for the analysis. Adventitious roots about 1 cm long (weight 15–20 mg) from 8 to 10 cm sprouts were used for GUS activity measurement in the roots of tobacco plants.

GUS activity level at different daylight duration was studied in the period from day 30 after T3 homozygous seeds germination until the first fruits ripening on day 87. The plants were grown directly from seed in the soil, bypassing selection stage on the selective medium with hygromycin, which had duration of 28 days in other experiments. Seven transgenic tobacco plants from each line were analyzed, three of them were grown under short-day (12/12 h) and the other four under long-day (16/8 h) condition.

Histochemical staining of T3 plants using X-Gluc

Five plants from each population were studied: populations No. 8-2-2 and 19-1-2 for Т3р2120 transgene; populations No. 10-8-9 and 14-3-3 for Т3p455 transgene (Fig. 5a). Expression of the gus reporter gene in different organs (root, stem, leaf, bud, anthers) and at different stages of plant development (gametophytic and sporophytic) was studied using histochemical staining of tissues with GUS substrate X-Gluc.

Whole transgenic tobacco plants grown in soil for 2 weeks after transplanting from aseptic condition, or buds, anthers, microsporocytes and pollen during flowering and fruiting were used for staining. For detection of GUS activity staining was performed according to the method by Jefferson et al. [42]. Whole plants or their organs were fully immersed in the staining solution (10 mM EDTA; 0.1 % Triton X-100; 1 mM K3Fe(CN)6; 1 mM K4Fe(CN)6; 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid, sodium salt (X-Gluc) (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA) 2 mM in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0). Samples were exposed to vacuum (80 kPa) for 30 min, then incubated at 37°С for 24 h and washed in 70 % ethanol.

RNA extraction and synthesis of first chain cDNA

Total RNA was extracted from plant leaves (100 mg) using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. To eliminate genomic DNA contamination, RNA was treated with DNase RQ1 RNase-Free (Promega, USA) and stored at minus 70 °C.

The first chain cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription using the oligonucleotide oligo-dT (Syntol, Russia) as a primer and RNA-dependent DNA polymerase of Malone mice leukemia virus (M-MLV). The final incubation mixture contained 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.2), 8 mM MgSO4, 10 mM DTT, 50 mM KСl, 0.4 mM each of dNTPs, 100 pmol oligo-dT primer, 5 units of RNase inhibitor, 25 units of reverse transcriptase and 1 μg of total RNA. The reaction was carried out for 1 h at 37 °C.

Real-time RT-PCR

Four transgenic plants of each population from each deletion variant Т3p2120 (No. 8-2-2 and No. 19-1-2) and Т3p455 (No. 14-3-3 and No. 10-8-9) at the age of 58 days from the moment of seed germination in the soil grown under long-day condition (16/8 h) were used to study correlation between GUS activity and gus gene mRNA content.

Evaluation of gus gene expression relative to the expression of actin gene was performed as triplicate using specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S3, except gus-1 and gus-2 primers). The primers were selected so that the length of the PCR product was less than 150 base pairs. Specificity of amplification was checked by electrophoresis in 1.5 % agarose gel; if single amplicon was observed, amplification was assumed to be specific. Additionally, to confirm the specificity of the primers used, amplification products were cloned in the vector pGEM-T and sequenced on an automated sequencing machine AhFexpress II (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, USA). Real-time PCR was performed on a cycler CFX96 (BioRad, USA) in the presence of the intercalating dye SYBR Green I in 25 μL of reaction mixture containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM each of dNTPs, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase, 5 μM specific primers, and 0.01 μL of the reverse transcription product.

Real-time PCR was performed under the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle 94 °C, 3 min; 40 cycles of (94 °C, 15 s; 60 °C, 15 s; 72 °C, 30 s). Specificity of amplification was checked after the last PCR cycle by analysis of the melting curve (from 55 to 95 °C). Reaction efficiency was determined by performing real-time PCR analysis with several dilution steps of cDNA. Statistical processing of PCR data was performed using the program qgene-96 [47]. For expression analysis, ΔΔCt method was applied [48].

To calculate the changes of gene expression in the test samples compared to control ones, the following equation was used: C = (1 + E)- ΔΔCt,where ΔΔCt = ΔCt (gus) - ΔCt (actin), Ct (gus) - threshold cycle difference between test and control samples for gus gene, ΔCt (actin) - threshold cycle difference between test and control samples for actin gene, E – reaction efficiency.

Southern blot hybridization

Tobacco genomic DNA (20 μg) was digested overnight at 37 °C with 60 U EcoRI which cut the T-DNA of p2120 and p455 at a single position (see Producing genetic constructs for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation). The fragments were separated on a 0.9 % agarose gel and transferred to a positive-charged nylon membrane Hybond N+ (GE Healthcare,UK) by capillary blotting following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA probe was constructed by PCR using plasmid p2120 as the template, and primers gus-1 and gus-2 (Additional file 1: Table S3). Probe DNA (740 bp) was labeled with alkaline phosphatase using Amersham Gene Image AlkPhos Direct Labelling and Detection System (GE Healthcare, UK). Prehybridization, hybridization (overnight at 60 °C) with alkaline phosphatase-labeled probe, and subsequent washings of the membrane were carried out according to the AlkPhos Direct Labeling System protocol. Detection was performed using CDP-Star detection reagent following the manufacturer’s directions (Amersham CDP-Star Detection reagent, GE Healthcare, UK).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the GenBank repository (accession number KX196447).

Abbreviations

4MU: 

4-methylumbelliferone

4MUG: 

4-methylumbelliferyl β-D-galactopyranoside

ARE: 

adenylate-uridylate-rich element

bp: 

base pair(s)

CaMV: 

cauliflower mosaic virus

dNTP: 

deoxynucleoside triphosphates

EDTA: 

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

GCN4: 

general control nonderepressible

GUS: 

β-glucuronidase

klx: 

kilolux

LB medium: 

Luria broth medium

LRE: 

light responsive element

mRNA: 

messenger ribonucleic acid

MYB: 

myeloblastosis

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

PR-protein: 

pathogenesis-related

SE: 

standard error

SmAMP: 

Stellaria media antimicrobial peptide

T-DNA: 

transfer deoxyribonucleic acid

UTR: 

untranslated region

X-Gluc: 

5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation, agreement No (RFMEFI60414X0028). The work was performed with the use of scientific equipment of Center for collective use “Biotechnology” at All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (Moscow, Russia).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology
(2)
IBC Generium LLC

References

  1. Potenza C, Aleman L, Sengupta-Gopalan C. Targeting transgene expression in research, agricultural, and environmental applications: Promoters used in plant transformation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2004;40(1):1–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhu C, Naqvi S, Gomez-Galera S, Pelacho AM, Capell T, Christou P. Transgenic strategies for the nutritional enhancement of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(12):548–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Naqvi S, Farre G, Sanahuja G, Capell T, Zhu C, Christou P. When more is better: multigene engineering in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(1):48–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mette MF, van der Winden J, Matzke MA, Matzke AJ. Production of aberrant promoter transcripts contributes to methylation and silencing of unlinked homologous promoters in trans. EMBO J. 1999;18(1):241–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lessard PA, Kulaveerasingam H, York GM, Strong A, Sinskey AJ. Manipulating gene expression for the metabolic engineering of plants. Metab Eng. 2002;4(1):67–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mourrain P, van Blokland R, Kooter JM, Vaucheret H. A single transgene locus triggers both transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing through double-stranded RNA production. Planta. 2007;225(2):365–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH. Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature. 1985;313(6005):810–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Porto MS, Pinheiro MP, Batista VG, dos Santos RC, Filho Pde A, de Lima LM. Plant promoters: an approach of structure and function. Mol Biotechnol. 2014;56(1):38–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Kaff NS, Kreike MM, Covey SN, Pitcher R, Page AM, Dale PJ. Plants rendered herbicide-susceptible by cauliflower mosaic virus-elicited suppression of a 35S promoter-regulated transgene. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(9):995–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Stam M, Mol JNM, Kooter JM. Review Article: The silence of genes in transgenic plants. Ann Bot. 1997;79(1):3–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jakowitsch J, Papp I, Moscone EA, van der Winden J, Matzke M, Matzke AJ. Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a transgene locus that induces silencing and methylation of homologous promoters in trans. Plant J. 1999;17(2):131–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar D, Patro S, Ranjan R, Sahoo DK, Maiti IB, Dey N. Development of useful recombinant promoter and its expression analysis in different plant cells using confocal laser scanning microscopy. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24627.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Patro S, Kumar D, Ranjan R, Maiti IB, Dey N. The development of efficient plant promoters for transgene expression employing plant virus promoters. Mol Plant. 2012;5(4):941–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. McElroy D, Zhang W, Cao J, Wu R. Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation. Plant Cell. 1990;2(2):163–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen AH, Sharrock RA, Quail PH. Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Mol Biol. 1992;18(4):675–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornejo MJ, Luth D, Blankenship KM, Anderson OD, Blechl AE. Activity of a maize ubiquitin promoter in transgenic rice. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;23(3):567–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Park SH, Yi N, Kim YS, Jeong MH, Bang SW, Choi YD, et al. Analysis of five novel putative constitutive gene promoters in transgenic rice plants. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(9):2459–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang J, Oard JH. Rice ubiquitin promoters: deletion analysis and potential usefulness in plant transformation systems. Plant Cell Rep. 2003;22(2):129–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Coussens G, Aesaert S, Verelst W, Demeulenaere M, De Buck S, Njuguna E, et al. Brachypodium distachyon promoters as efficient building blocks for transgenic research in maize. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(11):4263–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Callis J, Raasch JA, Vierstra RD. Ubiquitin extension proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana. Structure, localization, and expression of their promoters in transgenic tobacco. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(21):12486–93.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang N, McHale LK, Finer JJ. Isolation and characterization of “GmScream” promoters that regulate highly expressing soybean (Glycine max Merr.) genes. Plant Sci. 2015;241:189–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. De La Torre CM, Finer JJ. The intron and 5′ distal region of the soybean Gmubi promoter contribute to very high levels of gene expression in transiently and stably transformed tissues. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34(1):111–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Baszczynski C, Barbour E, Miki B, ALS3 promoter. US: Pioneer Hi-Bred International; 1997. US5659026 A.Google Scholar
  24. Xiao K, Zhang C, Harrison M, Wang Z-Y. Isolation and characterization of a novel plant promoter that directs strong constitutive expression of transgenes in plants. Mol Breeding. 2005;15(2):221–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cazzonelli CI, McCallum EJ, Lee R, Botella JR. Characterization of a strong, constitutive mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) promoter with a complex mode of regulation in planta. Transgenic Res. 2005;14(6):941–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shukurov RR, Voblikova VD, Nikonorova AK, Komakhin RR, Komakhina VV, Egorov TA, et al. Transformation of tobacco and Arabidopsis plants with Stellaria media genes encoding novel hevein-like peptides increases their resistance to fungal pathogens. Transgenic Res. 2012;21(2):313–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(1):297–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Prestridge DS. SIGNAL SCAN: a computer program that scans DNA sequences for eukaryotic transcriptional elements. Comput Appl Biosci. 1991;7(2):203–6.Google Scholar
  29. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Schnurr JA, Guerra DJ. The CaMV 35S promoter is sensitive to shortened photoperiod in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2000;19(3):279–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sawant S, Singh P, Gupta S, Madnala R, Tuli R. Conserved nucleotide sequences in highly expressed genes in plants. J Genet. 1999;78(2):123–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Gourrierec J, Li YF, Zhou DX. Transcriptional activation by Arabidopsis GT-1 may be through interaction with TFIIA-TBP-TATA complex. Plant J. 1999;18(6):663–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Washida H, Wu CY, Suzuki A, Yamanouchi U, Akihama T, Harada K, et al. Identification of cis-regulatory elements required for endosperm expression of the rice storage protein glutelin gene GluB-1. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40(1):1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rouster J, Leah R, Mundy J, Cameron-Mills V. Identification of a methyl jasmonate-responsive region in the promoter of a lipoxygenase 1 gene expressed in barley grain. Plant J. 1997;11(3):513–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou DX. Regulatory mechanism of plant gene transcription by GT-elements and GT-factors. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4(6):210–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rushton PJ, Torres JT, Parniske M, Wernert P, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE. Interaction of elicitor-induced DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J. 1996;15(20):5690–700.Google Scholar
  37. Kirsch C, Takamiya-Wik M, Schmelzer E, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE. A novel regulatory element involved in rapid activation of parsley ELI7 gene family members by fungal elicitor or pathogen infection. Mol Plant Pathol. 2000;1(4):243–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Puente P, Wei N, Deng XW. Combinatorial interplay of promoter elements constitutes the minimal determinants for light and developmental control of gene expression in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 1996;15(14):3732–43.Google Scholar
  39. Chattopadhyay S, Puente P, Deng XW, Wei N. Combinatorial interaction of light-responsive elements plays a critical role in determining the response characteristics of light-regulated promoters in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 1998;15(1):69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Terzaghi WB, Cashmore AR. Photomorphogenesis. Seeing the light in plant development. Curr Biol. 1995;5(5):466–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Escobar MA, Franklin KA, Svensson AS, Salter MG, Whitelam GC, Rasmusson AG. Light regulation of the Arabidopsis respiratory chain. Multiple discrete photoreceptor responses contribute to induction of type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenase genes. Plant Physiol. 2004;136(1):2710–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Quaedvlieg NM, Schlaman HM, Admiraal P, Wijting S, Stougaard J, Spaink H. Fusions between green fluorescent protein and β-glucuronidase as sensitive and vital bifunctional reporters in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1998;38(5):861–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Strelnikova SR, Voblikova VD, Shukurov RR, Babakov AV, Komakhin RA. Study of novel plant promoter of gene proSmAMP2 from Stellaria media by Agrobacterium infiltration of plants. Biotechnol Russ. 2014;3:8–17.Google Scholar
  44. Murashige T, Skoog F. A Revised Medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15(3):473–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Jefferson RA, Burgess SM, Hirsh D. beta-glucuronidase from Escherichia coli as a gene-fusion marker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(22):8447–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Muller PY, Janovjak H, Miserez AR, Dobbie Z. Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2002;32(6):1372. –4, 6, 8–9.Google Scholar
  48. Bustin SA. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000;25(2):169–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Komakhin et al. 2016

Advertisement