Open Access

Production of oleanane-type sapogenin in transgenic rice via expression of β-amyrin synthase gene from Panax japonicus C. A. Mey

  • Zhiwei Huang1, 2,
  • Juncheng Lin2,
  • Zuxin Cheng2,
  • Ming Xu2,
  • Mingshu Guo2,
  • Xinying Huang2,
  • Zhijian Yang2 and
  • Jingui Zheng2Email author
BMC Biotechnology201515:45

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0166-4

Received: 6 February 2015

Accepted: 15 May 2015

Published: 2 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Panax japonicus C. A. Mey. is a rare traditional Chinese herbal medicine that uses ginsenosides as its main active ingredient. Rice does not produce ginsenosides because it lacks a key rate-limiting enzyme (β-amyrin synthase, βAS); however, it produces a secondary metabolite, 2,3-oxidosqualene, which is a precursor for ginsenoside biosynthesis.

Results

In the present study, the P. japonicus βAS gene was transformed into the rice cultivar ‘Taijing 9’ using an Agrobacterium-mediated approach, resulting in 68 rice transgenic plants of the T0 generation. Transfer-DNA (T-DNA) insertion sites in homozygous lines of the T2 generation were determined by using high-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (hiTAIL-PCR) and were found to vary among the tested lines. Approximately 1–2 copies of the βAS gene were detected in transgenic rice plants. Real-time PCR and Western blotting analyses showed that the transformed βAS gene could be overexpressed and β-amyrin synthase could be expressed in rice. HPLC analysis showed that the concentration of oleanane-type sapogenin oleanolic acid in transgenic rice was 8.3–11.5 mg/100 g dw.

Conclusions

The current study is the first report on the transformation of P. japonicus βAS gene into rice. We have successfully produced a new rice germplasm, “ginseng rice”, which produces oleanane-type sapogenin.

Keywords

Ginsenosides Sapogenin β-amyrin synthase gene Rice Genetic transformation

Background

Rice is one of the world’s major food crops. It is the staple food for nearly half of the world’s population [1]. Traditional breeding techniques, especially hybrid rice technology, have contributed to the improvement of rice yield and quality. However, there are compounds that rice cannot synthesize or can only produce at very low levels, and traditional breeding techniques are apparently incapable of resolving these problems. Transgenic technology provides an efficient means of improving rice quality at the genetic level [24] based on the principle that creating a new rice germplasm that is capable of producing exogenous active ingredients through genetic engineering could improve the nutritional quality of rice. For example, Ye et al. [5] and Paine et al. [6] produced the first and second generations of “golden rice”, respectively, mainly by expressing exogenous key genes in the β-carotene biosynthesis pathway in the endosperm. The reported concentration of β-carotene was 1.6 μg/g and 37 μg/g in these two transgenic rice strains, respectively. Lee et al. [7] transformed the sesame 2S albumin gene into rice and produced “sesame nutrition rice”, and the methionine content of the seeds reached 0.40% in the T2 generation rice lines, which represented a 38% increase relative to that of the control rice lines.

P. japonicus is a rare traditional Chinese herbal medicine that uses ginseng saponin as its main active ingredient. Its health-protective effects include improving immunity, preventing tumors, and facilitating adaptation [8, 9]. The total saponin content in the roots of P. japonicus can reach 15%, which is 2- to 7-fold higher than that of P. ginseng and 3-fold higher than that of P. quinquefolius [8, 9]. Ginsenosides are triterpenoid saponins of plant secondary metabolites, i.e. the product of triterpenoid saponins biosynthesis branch in the isoprenoid pathway (Fig. 1) [1012].
Fig. 1

Biosynthetic pathway of triterpenoid saponin and sterols in plants [1012]. Intermediates: FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; SQS, squalene synthase; SQE, squalene epoxidase; CS, cycloartenol synthase; LS, lanosterol synthase; αAS, α-amyrin synthase; LUS, lupeol synthase; DS, dammarenediol-II synthase; βAS, β-amyrin synthase

Triterpenoid saponins are formed by different cyclization reactions of squalene. The synthesis of squalene is the branch point of the central isoprenoid pathway. It occurs at the triterpenoid saponin biosynthetic branch [11, 13, 14]. 2, 3-oxidosqualene cyclases (OSCs), the rate-limiting enzymes in triterpenoid saponins and sterols biosynthesis branches, catalyze 2,3-oxidosqualene, which results in the formation of the triterpenoid skeleton, cycloartenol, and other compounds. With further modifications, these compounds can form a variety of triterpenoid saponins, phytosterols, and other macromolecules.

The type and catalytic function of OSCs differ between ginseng plants and rice. The OSCs of ginseng plants are mainly β-amyrin synthase (βAS) and dammarenediol-II synthase (DS). These catalyze 2,3-oxidosqualene to produce oleanane-type and dammarane-type substances, namely, β-amyrin and dammarenediol-II, respectively. Rice OSC is a cycloartenol synthase (CS) that catalyzes 2,3-oxidosqualene to produce cycloartenol [6, 11, 14]. Zhao et al. [15] studied the expression of ginseng βAS and the regulation of ginsenosides biosynthesis by using antisense RNA technology. When antisense βAS was introduced into the hairy roots of ginseng, the transcription levels of the βAS gene significantly decreased compared to those of non-transgenic controls. In addition, βAS activity also decreased, and the concentration of oleanane-type ginsenosides Ro decreased by as much as 40%. DS activity increased in these βAS antisense lines, and the concentration of dammarane-type ginsenosides increased by up to 30%. These results proved that regulation of ginsenosides synthesis could be achieved by altering the gene expression pattern of βAS by using genetic engineering techniques.

The βAS gene has been cloned from Panax ginseng (GenBank Acc. Nos.: AB014057.1, AB009030.1) [10], Aralia elata (GenBank Acc. No.: HM219225.1), Betula platyphylla (GenBank Acc. No.: AB055512.1), Malus domestica (GenBank Acc. No.: FJ032007.1), Pisum sativum (GenBank Acc. No.: AB034802.1) [10], and Centella asiatica (GenBank Acc. No.: AY520818.1). The βAS gene has not been cloned from rice. However, rice OSC is a CS, which catalyzes 2,3-oxidosqualene to produce the sterol substrate, cycloartenol [10, 1618]. This indicates that although 2,3-oxidosqualene, the precursor of rice sterols synthesis, is also the precursor for ginsenosides synthesis [11, 13], rice cannot synthesize ginsenosides because rice lacks βAS and DS, which are the rate-limiting enzymes in the synthesis of ginsenosides.

In summary, genetic engineering of the secondary metabolic pathways allows rice to synthesize saponin. However, no report on the use of genetic engineering on rice to synthesize saponin currently exists. Previously, our research group isolated the full-length cDNA of βAS (GenBank Acc. No.: KP658156) from the roots of P. japonicus, cloned this into the pMD® 18-T Simple Vector (Takara, D103A), and named the construct as pMD-AS.

To create a new “ginseng rice” germplasm and to provide germplasm resources for further improvement of rice quality, the present study transformed the P. japonicus βAS gene into rice to synthesize oleanane-type sapogenin.

Methods

Experimental materials

Rice cultivar ‘Taijing 9’, Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain DH5α, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens) strain LBA4404, plasmids pMD-AS, pMD-Gt1-AmA1, pBlue-Ubi, and pCD-AMA1-hpt were maintained by the Agricultural Product Quality Institute of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.

Construction of a binary plant expression vector carrying the βAS gene

The construction of a binary plant expression vector harboring the βAS gene was as described elsewhere [19]. Briefly, double digestion of plasmids pMD-AS by SmaI and SacI was conducted to isolate a DNA fragment that included the βAS gene. The fragment was then recovered and ligated to SmaI and SacI double-digested pMD-Gt1-AmA1 vector to form pMD-Gt1-AS. The pBlue-Ubi plasmid was double-digested with HindIII and BamHI to release the Ubi promoter fragment. This fragment was then recovered and ligated to HindIII and BamHI double-digested pMD-Gt1-AS vector to form plasmid pMD-Ubi-AS. The pMD-Ubi-AS plasmid was double-digested with HindIII and SacI to release the Ubi-βAS fragment. This fragment was then recovered and ligated to HindIII and SacI double-digested plasmid pCD-AMA1-hpt to form binary plant expression vector, pCD-AS-hpt. The structure of pCD-AS-hpt is shown in Fig. 2. The recombinant vector pCD-AS-hpt was confirmed using HindIII/SacI and HindIII digestion, and the plasmid was sequenced to determine that no mutations in the target gene were present.
Fig. 2

T-DNA region of the plant expression vector pCD-AS-hpt. Intermediates: 35S polyA, terminator of CaMV 35S gene; HPT, hygromycin phosphotransferase gene; 35S P, 35S promoter; NOS T, terminator of nopaline synthase gene; Ubi P, Ubiquitin promoter; LB, left border; RB, right border

Transformation of binary βAS plant expression vector into rice

Inflorescences of rice ‘Taijing 9’ at 10–15 days after pollination were collected based on the method of Chen et al. [20] to induce embryogenic callus and subculture callus once every 15 days with fresh medium.

Using the freeze-thaw method [21], the binary expression vector pCD-AS-hpt was transformed into A. tumefaciens LBA4404, which was used to transform embryogenic calli. Co-culture of callus with Agrobacterium, screening of resistant calli and induction of differentiation of cultured calli, rooting of resistant seedlings, and other tests were conducted as described by Burkhardt et al. [22]. The medium used for Agrobacterium infection was AAM medium (pH 5.2). NB medium (pH 5.8) was used for genetic transformation of rice. To screen for resistant calli, a culture medium supplemented with 50 mg/L hygromycin B (Hyg) was used [22].

Identification of transgenic rice by PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of resistant seedlings of transgenic rice. Premix Taq® Version 2.0 (Takara, D334A) was used to detect the βAS and hygromycin resistance (HPT) genes in the transgenic rice plants. The primers used in the present study were as follows: ASF5 (5′-ATGCTTGCTTGTTGGGTTGAGG-3′), ASR2 (5′-GCCTGAATTGCTGATGAAGTGC-3′), Hpt-1 (5′-TACACAGCCATCGGTCCAGA-3′), and Hpt-2 (5′-TAGGAGGGCGTGGATATGT C-3′). The PCR reaction system included a 25-μL solution containing 12.5 μL Premix Taq® Version 2.0 (+dye), 0.5 μL of each of the forward and reverse primers (20 μM), 2.0 μL of DNA template, and 9.5 μL of ddH2O. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min; 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s/kb for 35 cycles; and 72°C for 10 min.

Analysis of T-DNA insertion sites by hiTAIL-PCR

High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (hiTAIL-PCR) is a convenient way of locating T-DNA insertion sites [23]. Leaf genomic DNA was extracted from rice homozygous lines of the T2 generation. Based on the methods described by Liu et al. [22], hiTAIL-PCR was conducted by using Premix Ex Taq® Version 2.0 (Takara, D335A) to amplify genomic sequences flanking the T-DNA insertion sites in transgenic rice. The clear bands that had good specificity and were > 200 bp in size for the third PCR product were recovered for sequencing. PCR verification of the T-DNA flanking sequences was conducted by using 2× Eco Taq PCR SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, AS151). The forward primer was RB-3b (5′-GATCGCCCTTCCC AACAGTTGC-3′), and the reverse primers were A30R (5′-CAACACCCACATCGCCATCTG C-3′), A37R (5′-GCCGAGACCATCGATTCCAATG-3′), A43R1 (5′-GGCGTATGTCTCATT GGAGGACTGC-3′), and A43R2 (5′-CCAAGTACAGCCAACACTGCTGGTC-3′). The PCR reaction system included a 50-μL solution containing 25.0 μL of 2× Eco Taq PCR SuperMix (+dye), 1.0 μL of each of the forward and reverse primers (20 μM), 2.0 μL of the DNA template, and 21.0 μL of ddH2O. PCR reaction conditions were 94 °C for 5 min; 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s/kb for 35 cycles; and 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were recovered for sequencing. The resulting DNA sequences were then aligned to the rice ‘Nipponbare’ genome sequence (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu) by using the BLASTN program to determine the insertion sites and copy number of T-DNA in transgenic rice.

Determination of βAS expression levels using real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from the leaves of homozygous rice lines of the T2 generation by using TRIzol™ (Invitrogen, 15596026). Residual DNA was removed from the RNA samples by DNase I treatment (Takara, D2215). The reaction of DNase I treatment was as follows: 20–50 μg of total RNA, 5 μL of 10 × DNase I Buffer, 2 μL (10 units) of DNase I (RNase-free), 20 units of an RNase inhibitor, and DEPC-treated water to make up a total volume of 50 μL. DNase I treatment was conducted at 37 °C for 30 min, and the subsequent steps were conducted as recommended by the manufacturer. A PrimeScript® RT Reagent Kit (Takara, DRR037A) was used to reverse-transcribe total RNA to synthesize the first-strand cDNA. The conditions for reverse transcription reaction were as follows: 37 °C for 15 min and 85 °C for 5 s. SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara, RR041A) and the ABI 7500 real-time PCR System were used for βAS real-time PCR. Primers were qASF (5′-TGCCAGAGCAAGAAAATGGA-3′), qASR (5′-CATAGGAAGGAAAGGAGGAAGGA-3′). ACTIN served as the reference gene, and the primers were qACTF (5′-CATCTTGGCATCTCTCAGCAC-3′) and qACTR (5′-AACTTTGTCCACGCTAATGAA-3′). The PCR reaction system was a 25-μL solution containing 12.5 μL of 2× SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II, 0.5 μL of each of the forward and reverse primers (20 μM), 0.5 μL of 50× ROX Reference Dye II, 5.0 μL of first strand cDNA (diluted 5 times), and 6.0 μL of ddH2O. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s; and 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 34 s for 40 cycles. The relative expression of the βAS gene was RQ = 2-ΔΔCt. Each sample was amplified in triplicate.

Western blot analysis of the βAS protein

Total protein was extracted from seeds of the T2 generation homozygous rice lines using RIPA lysis buffer (Beijing DingGuo Changsheng Biotechnology Company, Ltd., China), and total protein concentration was determined by using a total protein assay kit (Biuret Method, Shanghai Rongsheng Biotechnology Company, China). A 20–40 μg aliquot of the total protein solution was subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis by using a Mini-PRO TEAN® 3 Cell (BioRad). The Proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane by using a Trans-Blot SD semi-dry electrophoretic transfer cell (BioRad) and transmembrane buffer (48 mmol/L Tris base, 39 mmol/L glycine, 0.037% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 20% methanol). The PVDF membrane was transferred to the TBST buffer (10 mmol/L Tris–HCl, 100 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.2% Tween-20, pH7.4) containing 5% non-fat milk and incubated at 4 °C overnight. After incubation, the PVDF membrane was reacted with the primary antibody (antiserum of the rabbit immunized with the βAS gene product expressed in E. coli) diluted in TBST buffer containing 5% non-fat milk (v/v 1:500) and incubated at 4 °C overnight. The PVDF membrane was then washed with TBST buffer. The secondary antibody (HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG, Beijing DingGuo Changsheng Biotechnology Company, Ltd., China) was diluted with TBST buffer (v/v 1:5,000), and the PVDF membrane was transferred to the above solution and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The PVDF membrane was then washed with TBST buffer. The hybridization signal was developed by using the SuperSensitive ECL-solution (Pierce) and exposed for 1 min by using an X-ray film (Kodak) in a dark room [19]. Rabbit polyclonal antibody against βAS (primary antibody) was prepared by GL Biochem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Analysis of sapogenin content in transgenic rice by HPLC

The rice grains from the T2 generation homozygous rice lines were ground to powder and passed through an 80-mesh screen. Approximately 0.2 g of each sample was then transferred into a round flask to which 4 mL of methanol was added. The round flask was connected to a Dimroth’s condensing tube and reflux extraction was conducted in an 80 °C water bath for 12 h. Methanol was added to the extraction solution to a final volume of 5 mL. The solution was filtered through a 0.45-μm organic filter membrane and then subjected to HPLC analysis [24, 25].

The LC-20A high-performance liquid chromatography, SPD-M20A UV–vis detector and the software LC solution 1.24 SP1 (Shimadzu, Japan) were used to determine the concentration of sapogenin using oleanolic acid (Ole) as the standard. The column was a Hypersil ODS2 C18 column (250 nm × 4.6 nm, 5 μm; Dalian Elite Company, China), the chromatographic conditions were as follows: mobile phase was methanol - 0.05 mol/L NaH2PO4 (85:15), flow rate was 1.0 ml/min, column temperature was 30 °C, and the detection wavelength was 210 nm [2426]. Standard oleanolic acid (Batch No.: 110709–200505) was purchased from the Chinese Academy of Food and Drug Testing.

Results and discussion

Generation of transgenic rice

The digestion products of the binary plant expression vector pCD-AS-hpt were of the expected sizes. Sequencing of pCD-AS-hpt showed no mutations in the βAS gene. These findings were indicative of the successful construction of the binary plant expression vector pCD-AS-hpt.

The binary vector was transferred to rice ‘Taijing 9’, and 302 anti-Hyg rice plants of the T0 generation were generated. The PCR results of HPT and βAS (Fig. 3) indicated that all resistant seedlings contained the HPT gene, whereas 68 plants contained βAS (positive rate: 22.5%). No significant differences in agronomic traits or appearance between the offspring of transgenic rice and the receiver ‘Taijing 9’ were observed.
Fig. 3

PCR analysis of HPT (845 bp) and βAS (584 bp) in transgenic rice plants. M, DNA Marker DL 2000. (1–12) Transgenic rice plants. (13), positive control (vector carrying the βAS gene). (14) Negative control (rice cultivar ‘Taijing 9’)

Confirmation of T-DNA insertion sites by hiTAIL-PCR

hiTAIL-PCR analysis showed clear bands with good specificity in the third round of PCR products from three lines of the T2 generation homozygous rice lines, whereas that of the other lines were vague or smaller than 200 bp. Sequencing (GenBank Acc. Nos.: KP687751, KP687752, KP687753, and KP687754), PCR verification (Fig. 4), and alignment with the rice ‘Nipponbare’ genome sequence showed that the transgenic rice lines A30 and A37 both had one copy of the βAS gene-harboring T-DNA, whereas line A43 had two copies of the transgene. The insertion sites in these three lines were located at 9,533,306 bp in chromosome 5, 5,429,409 bp in chromosome 12, and 32,736,409 bp and 32,740,184 bp in chromosome 2, respectively.
Fig. 4

PCR analysis of T-DNA flanking sequences from transgenic rice plants. M, DNA Marker DL 2000. (1–4), PCR products of the T-DNA flanking sequences

Previous studies have shown that transgenic plants harbor a few copies of T-DNA insertions, with an average of 1.2–2.0 copies, and most have only a single copy [27, 28]. In the present study, various homozygous lines of the T2 generation harbored 1–2 copies of T-DNA, and the insertion sites of T-DNAs varied. This also confirms that T-DNA insertion is a relatively random event [29, 30].

Overexpression of exogenous βAS in transgenic rice

Real-time PCR analysis showed that the βAS gene was overexpressed in the T2 generation homozygous lines A10, A30, A37, and A43. The relative expression level was within the range of 5782.1–10957.8 (Fig. 5, A34 was a negative line).
Fig. 5

Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR analysis of βAS expression in transgenic rice plants

Western blot analysis of βAS protein

The rice positive samples of the T2 generation homozygous lines A10, A30, A37, and A43 and the positive control (prokaryotic expression product of βAS) showed the expected hybridization band of about 88 kDa in size. This specific band was not detected in the negative sample A34 line (Fig. 6). These results indicated that the seeds of the transgenic rice expressed βAS.
Fig. 6

Detection of the βAS protein (about 88 kDa) in transgenic rice by western blotting. PC, positive control (the products of prokaryotic expression of βAS). A34, negative rice control

Analysis of sapogenin content in transgenic rice by HPLC

HPLC analysis indicated that the seeds of the T2 generation homozygous lines A10, A30, A37, and A43 had an Ole content ranging from 8.3 to 11.5 mg/100 g dw (Figs. 7 and 8).
Fig. 7

HPLC chromatograms of oleanolic acid. a Ole standard. b HPLC chromatograms of Ole in transgenic rice plants. c non-transgenic control rice

Fig. 8

Oleanolic acid production as analyzed by HPLC. (ck), non-transgenic control rice

Transgenic yeast and rice as new sources of ginsenosides

Because supplies of wild ginseng have been depleted, ginsenosides are mainly extracted from cultivated ginseng. However, artificial cultivation is relatively time-consuming and does not allow continuous cropping, preventing ginsenoside production from meeting the increased demand of the community. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new sources of ginsenosides for medicinal use [8, 9]. Scientists utilize synthetic biology to synthesize ginsenosides. Cloning and characterization of a key enzyme in the synthesis of 20 (S)-protopanaxadiol (PPD) has resulted in the construction of a yeast cell capable of producing PPD [31]. Cytochrome P450 was found to catalyze PPD to produce 20 (S)–protopanaxatriol (PPT) [32]. A “ginseng yeast” capable of simultaneously producing three kinds of ginsenosides, Ole, PPD, and PPT has also been constructed, with yields of 21.4 mg/L, 17.2 mg/L, and 15.9 mg/L, respectively [33, 34]. The rare ginsenoside, compound K (CK), which has not been detected in ginsenosides, is the active metabolite that has been detected in the blood after oral administration of ginseng and other ginsenosides [35]. Yan et al. previously reported that ginseng UDP-glycosyltransferase (PgUGT1) could specifically catalyze glycosylation of the C-20S hydroxyl group in dammarane-type tetracyclic triterpenoids, and yeast cells synthesized CK from monosaccharides when PgUGT1 was co-expressed in the PPD synthesis pathway [36].

Adding the biosynthetic branch of new metabolites to rice by using genetic engineering facilitates the synthesis of new active ingredients. Modifying existing metabolic pathways in rice to increase the concentration of specific components to improve its nutritional value has become an important means of creating new germplasm. A number of important advances such as “golden rice” [5, 6], “high-iron rice” [37, 38], and “sesame nutrition rice” [7] can be attributed to this technique. In the present study, a new rice germplasm that produces oleanane-type sapogenin was produced by expressing the P. japonicus βAS gene. This germplasm can serve as a new resource for breeding “ginseng rice” varieties, as well as create new ginseng saponin donors. Because rice is a food crop that is simpler to cultivate than the ginseng genus plants, it is generally easier to produce saponins in modified strains, thus allowing more people to benefit from this novel production approach. Improvement in the standard of living has resulted higher production requirements for medicine and food. The saponins synthesized by plants might be safer and more efficient than those produced via cellular engineering. Therefore, the results of the present study will have a major impact on the genetic breeding of functional rice, as well as on research and development of sources of medical ginsenosides.

Conclusions

This is the first report on the transformation of the P. japonicus βAS gene into rice and the generation of a new “ginseng rice” germplasm that produces oleanane-type sapogenin. The concentration of Ole in transgenic rice was within the range of 8.3–11.5 mg/100 g dw. The current results indicate that it is feasible to breed new varieties of “ginseng rice” and create new ginsenoside donors by transforming key genes in the ginsenoside biosynthesis pathway.

Abbreviations

βAS: 

β-Amyrin synthase

T-DNA: 

Transfer-DNA

P. japonicus

Panax japonicus

P. ginseng

Panax ginseng

P. quinquefolius

Panax quinquefolius

FPP: 

Farnesyl pyrophosphate

SQS: 

Squalene synthase

SQE: 

Squalene epoxidase

CS: 

Cycloartenol synthase

LS: 

Lanosterol synthase

αAS: 

α-Amyrin synthase

LUS: 

Lupeol synthase

DS: 

Dammarenediol-II synthase

OSCs: 

2,3-Oxidosqualene cyclases

35S polyA: 

Terminator of CaMV 35S gene

HPT

Hygromycin phosphotransferase gene

35S P: 

35S promoter

NOS T: 

Terminator of the nopaline synthase gene

Ubi P: 

Ubiquitin promoter

LB: 

Left border

RB: 

Right border

E. coli

Escherichia coli

A. tumefaciens

Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Hyg: 

Hygromycin B

hiTAIL-PCR: 

High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR

HPLC: 

High-performance liquid chromatography

SDS-PAGE: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PC: 

Positive control

Ole: 

Oleanolic acid

PPD: 

20 (S)-Protopanaxadiol

PPT: 

20 (S)–Protopanaxatriol

CK: 

Compound K

PgUGT1: 

Panax ginseng UDP-glycosyltransferase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The National Transgenic Organism New Variety Culture Key Project (2009ZX08001-032B), the National Key Technology R&D Program (2013BAD01B05), and the Major Science and Technology Projects of Fujian Province (2013NZ0002-2) in China financially supported this research study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
(2)
Agricultural Product Quality Institute, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University

References

  1. Khush GS. What it will take to Feed 5.0 Billion Rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;59(1):1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Peng S, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Sanico AL, Cassman KG, Khush GS. Grain yield of rice culitvars and lines developed in Philippines since 1996. Crop Sci. 2000;40(2):307–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sofi P, Rather AG, Zargar MY. Breaking the yield barrier of rice: remodeling photosynthesis. Am J Plant Physiol. 2006;1(2):113–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M. Production of transgenic rice (Oryza Sativa L.) plants from agronomically important Indica and Japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bio/Technology. 1991;9(10):957–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ye XD, Al-Babili S, Klöti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beye P, et al. Engineering the provitamin A (beta-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science. 2000;287(5451):303–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, Vernon G, et al. Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(4):482–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee TTT, Chung M, Kao Y, Wang C, Chen L, Tzen JTC. Specific expression of a sesame storage protein in transgenic rice bran. J Cereal Sci. 2005;41(1):23–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li FY. Chinese Ginseng and American Ginseng. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press; 2002 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. Yun TK. Panax ginseng—a non-organ-specific cancer preventive? Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(1):49–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Haralampidis K, Trojanowska M, Osbourn AE. Biosynthesis of triterpenoid saponins in plants. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2002;75:31–49.Google Scholar
  11. Hao HL, Zhu XF, Zeng YZ. The biosynthesis and regulation of isoprenoids. J Zhejiang Agric Univ (Agric Life Sci). 2002;28(02):224–30 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. Liang YL, Zhao SJ. Progress in understanding of ginsenoside biosynthesis. Plant Biol. 2008;10(4):415–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chappell J. Biochemistry and molecular biology of the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1995;46:521–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen DH, Ye HC, Li GF, Liu Y. Advances in molecular biology of plant isoprenoid metabolic pathway. Acta Bot Sin. 2000;42(06):551–8 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. Zhao SJ, Hou CX, Xu LX, Liang YL, Qian YC, Yao S. Effects of suppressing oleanane-type ginsenoside biosynthesis on dammarane-type ginsenoside production. J Jilin Univ (Eng Tech Ed). 2011;41(3):865–8.Google Scholar
  16. Suzuki H, Achnine L, Xu R, Matsuda SPT, Dixon RA. A genomics approach to the early stages of triterpene saponin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2002;32(6):1033–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Haralampidis K, Bryan G, Qi X, Papadopoulou K, Bakht S, Melton R, et al. A new class of oxidosqualene cyclases directs synthesis of antimicrobial phytoprotectants in monocots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(23):13431–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Augustin JM, Kuzina V, Andersen SB, Bak S. Molecular activities, biosynthesis and evolution of triterpenoid saponins. Phytochemistry. 2011;72(6):435–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sambrook J, Russell DW, translated by Huang PT. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2002 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Chen L, Zhang S, Beachy RN, Fauquet CM. A protocol for consistent, largescale production of fertile transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;18:25–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofgen R, Willmitzer L. Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(20):9877.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Burkhardt PK, Beyer P, Wunn J, Kloti A, Armstrong GA, Schledz M, et al. Transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) endosperm expressing daffodil (Narcissus pseudonarcissus) phytoene synthase accumulates phytoene, a key intermediate of provitamin A biosynthesis. Plant J. 1997;11(5):1071–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu YG, Chen YL. High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences. Biotechniques. 2007;43(5):649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu W, Ding HJ. Determination of Ursolic Acid, Oleanolic Acid and Rosmarinic Acid in Prunella vulgaris L. by HPLC. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine. 2008;30(04):577–80.Google Scholar
  25. Wei JH, Li YH, Cai SF, Yang XM, Zhen HS. Determination of Oleanolic Acid and Ursolic Acid in Diospyros kaki by HPLC. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae. 2010;16(13):48–50.Google Scholar
  26. Wang HH, Wang ZZ, Guo WB. Comparative determination of ursolic acid and oleanolic acid of Macrocarpium officinalis (Sieb. et Zucc.) Nakai by RP-HPLC. Ind Crop Prod. 2008;28(3):328–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeon JS, Lee S, Jung KH, Jun SH, Jeong DH, Lee J, et al. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. Plant J. 2000;22(6):561–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Krishnan A, Guiderdoni E, An G, Hsing YC, Han CD, Lee MC, et al. Mutant resources in rice for functional genomics of the grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(1):165–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Azpiroz-Leehan R, Feldmann KA. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: going back and forth. Trends Genet. 1997;13(4):152–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR. T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1999;11(12):2283–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Han JY, Kim HJ, Kwon YS, Choi YE. The Cyt P450 enzyme CYP716A47 catalyzes the formation of protopanaxadiol from dammarenediol-II during ginsenoside biosynthesis in Panax ginseng. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(12):2062–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Han JY, Hwang HS, Choi SW, Kim HJ, Choi YE. Cytochrome P450 CYP716A53v2 catalyzes the formation of protopanaxatriol from protopanaxadiol during ginsenoside biosynthesis in Panax Ginseng. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53(9):1535–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Dai ZB, Liu Y, Zhang XN, Shi MY, Wang BB, Wang D, et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of ginsenosides. Metab Eng. 2013;20:146–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Dai ZB, Wang BB, Liu Y, Shi MY, Wang D, Zhang XN, et al. Producing aglycons of ginsenosides in bakers’ yeast. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3698.Google Scholar
  35. Hasegawa H. Proof of the mysterious efficacy of ginseng: basic and clinical trials: metabolic activation of ginsenoside: deglycosylation by intestinal bacteria and esterification with fatty acid. J Pharmacol Sci. 2004;95(2):153–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yan X, Fan Y, Wei W, Wang PP, Liu QF, Wei YJ, et al. Production of bioactive ginsenoside compound K in metabolically engineered yeast. Cell Res. 2014;24(6):770–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Goto F, Yoshihara T, Shigemoto N, Toki S, Takaiwa F. Iron fortification of rice seed by the soybean ferritin gene. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(3):282–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucca P, Hurrell R, Potrykus I. Genetic engineering approaches to improve the bioavailability and the level of iron in rice grains. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102(2–3):392–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement