Open Access

AC133+ progenitor cells as gene delivery vehicle and cellular probe in subcutaneous tumor models: a preliminary study

  • Ali M Rad1, 2,
  • ASM Iskander1,
  • Branislava Janic1,
  • Robert A Knight3,
  • Ali S Arbab1 and
  • Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh1, 4Email author
BMC Biotechnology20099:28

Received: 22 August 2008

Accepted: 27 March 2009

Published: 27 March 2009



Despite enormous progress in gene therapy for breast cancer, an optimal systemic vehicle for delivering gene products to the target tissue is still lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AC133+ progenitor cells (APC) can be used as both gene delivery vehicles and cellular probes for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, we used superparamagentic iron oxide (SPIO)-labeled APCs to carry the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) gene to the sites of implanted breast cancer in mouse model. In vivo real time tracking of these cells was performed by MRI and expression of hNIS was determined by Tc-99m pertechnetate (Tc-99m) scan.


Three million human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cells were subcutaneously implanted in the right flank of nude mice. APCs, isolated from fresh human cord blood, were genetically transformed to carry the hNIS gene using adenoviral vectors and magnetically labeled with ferumoxides-protamine sulfate (FePro) complexes. Magnetically labeled genetically transformed cells were administered intravenously in tumor bearing mice when tumors reached 0.5 cm in the largest dimension. MRI and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images were acquired 3 and 7 days after cell injection, with a 7 Tesla animal MRI system and a custom built micro-SPECT using Tc-99m, respectively. Expression of hNIS in accumulated cells was determined by staining with anti-hNIS antibody. APCs were efficiently labeled with ferumoxide-protamine sulfate (FePro) complexes and transduced with hNIS gene. Our study showed not only the accumulation of intravenously administered genetically transformed, magnetically labeled APCs in the implanted breast cancer, but also the expression of hNIS gene at the tumor site. Tc-99m activity ratio (tumor/non-tumor) was significantly different between animals that received non-transduced and transduced cells (P < 0.001).


This study indicates that genetically transformed, magnetically labeled APCs can be used both as delivery vehicles and cellular probes for detecting in vivo migration and homing of cells. Furthermore, they can potentially be used as a gene carrier system for the treatment of tumor or other diseases.


Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women [1, 2]. Against substantial research over the past decades, no definitive method for early detection and treatment of the breast cancer has been found. Gene therapy holds enormous therapeutic potential for breast cancer treatment [312]. In cancer gene therapy, viral vectors are administered locally or systematically [13]. Gene therapy using replication competent viral vectors could deliver their effects in two ways: 1) viral vectors can kill the tumor cells by infecting them and replicating inside cells (oncolysis); or 2) viral vectors can be used to insert therapeutic or suicidal genes, which can be targeted later [11, 14]. When administered locally, however, the infiltrative nature of the breast cancer poses a problem for the successful delivery of genes to the sites of invading tumor cells. In addition, several factors, including lack of an efficient vector and delivery system, limit the effectiveness of systemically delivered genes. Very recently, progenitor cells have been used as carriers for therapeutic genes and are considered as delivery vehicles for transferring exogenous genes to the cancer cells [15, 16]. In both cases, it is necessary to monitor the migration and homing of the genetically modified cells. However, current in vivo imaging techniques lack the ability to track the real time migration and homing of genetically altered cells to cancer tissue with acceptable resolution.

Labeling of cells with ferumoxides or other superparamagnetic iron oxides (SPIO) to track the migration of labeled cells is becoming routine in cellular MRI [1722]. Recently, we have been able to magnetically label different mammalian cells including hematopoietic stem cells using two Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved agents: ferumoxide and protamine sulfate. Ferumoxide is an incomplete dextran coated SPIO agent with an extremely high T2-relaxivity. It is used as contrast agent for liver diseases [23, 24]. We have shown a linear correlation between relaxivity and iron concentration in labeled cells [25]. Protamine sulfate is used clinically as antidode for heparin toxicity. It has been shown that viability, functionality, and differentiation capacity of labeled cells (including stem cells) do not change after labeling [19, 26].

AC133+ cells are a subpopulation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, which are believed to be more pluripotent, and incorporate into endothelial lining of neovessels in normal and pathological conditions [27]. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AC133+ progenitor cells (APCs) can be used as gene delivery/carrier vehicles and as cellular probes for MRI. We used superparamagentic iron oxide (SPIO)-labeled AC133+ progenitor cells (APCs) to carry the hNIS gene to sites of implanted breast cancer in a mouse model. In vivo real time tracking of cells was performed by MRI and expression of hNIS was determined by Tc-99m pertechnetate (Tc-99m) scan.


Our experiments and data from other published papers indicate that MDA-MB-231 is a slow growing breast cancer cell line. Tumor Xenografts will appear in nude mice 6 to 7 days after inoculation and grow to 0.5 to 0.7 cm in 14 days [28]. Our data showed that the tumor can have internal bleeding or surface ulceration when it grows to more than 1.2 cm in a short period of time. Our main focus was to track the administered APCs at the sites of active angiogenesis in xenoplanted breast cancer, which is not related to the presence or absence of estrogen receptor.

Efficiency of Iron Labeling

Labeling efficiency with FePro complexes was more than 90%, as determined by manual counting of PB-stained and unstained cells using a microscope.

Mean Iron Concentration

Mean intra-cellular iron concentration was measured based on a spectrophotometric method as described in the Method Section. The iron concentration was determined from three different batches of labeled cells, which were selected randomly during our experiments. The iron concentration was 8.4 ± 2.8 pg per cell.

Viability of Labeled Cells

Magnetically labeled genetically transduced APCs showed more than 75% viability compared to unlabeled non-transduced cells, whereas control unlabeled or labeled APCs were more than 90% viable.

Efficiency of Viral Transduction

Flowcytometric analysis indicated around 35% transduction efficiency using adenoviral vectors containing EGFP gene (Figure 1). Follow up fluorescent microscopic examination indicated substantial number of EGFP positive cells even after 12 days (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Transfection efficiency using adenoviral vectors containing EGFP as a reporter gene. Flowcytometric analysis shows 30% to 35% EGFP positive cells in both cell populations. Fluorescent microscopy also shows EGFP positive cells in culture even after 12 days of infection.

MRI Results

MR images clearly showed the presence of low signal intensity areas around and inside the tumors in mice that received iron labeled cells compared with the tumors that received PBS only or unlabeled AC133+ cells, indicating the accumulation of administered cells (Figures 2 and 3). The presence of iron labeled cells was also confirmed by PB staining (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 2

Accumulation of magnetically labeled, transgenic AC133+ progenitor cells (APCs) around the implanted tumor. MRI shows low signal intensity areas at the margin of the tumor (A, C), which are at the corresponding sites of iron positive cells detected by Prussian blue staining (E, F). The central low signal intensity areas are due to hemorrhagic foci within the tumor. B (trans-axial sections) and D (coronal sections) of SPECT studies indicate the accumulated transgenic APCs that are detected by T-99m (within the white dotted oval ROI). The SPECT study also proves the migration and homing of APCs at the margin of the tumors (seen on MRI). Immunohistochemistry shows the accumulation of NIS positive cells and CD31 positive cells at the corresponding sites, as detected by labeled secondary antibodies (G, H). The findings prove that APCs can carry reporter or therapeutic genes to the site of interest (here at the site of active angiogenesis) and magnetically labeled APCs will act as probe for cellular MRI. MRI and SPECT of control unlabeled non-transduced AC133+ progenitor cells (I, J)

Figure 3

Accumulation of magnetically labeled, non-transgenic APCs around the implanted tumor 7 days after IV administration. (A) Coronal sections of SPECT data indicating non-significant activity of Tc-99m at the tumor site (within the white circular ROI). MRI shows low signal intensity areas at the periphery of the tumor (B, C, arrows), which are at the corresponding sites of iron positive cells detected by Prussian blue staining (D, E).

Immunohistochemistry confirmed the accumulation of NIS positive cells at the corresponding sites, as detected by FITC labeled secondary antibodies (Figure 2G). These findings prove that APCs can carry reporter or therapeutic genes to the site of interest. In this case, they were found at the periphery of the tumors where active angiogenesis was observed. The accumulated cells also showed the expression of endothelial markers such as CD31 (Figure 2H).

SPECT Analysis

SPECT image analysis showed that the ratio of the total radioactivity (tumor/contralateral tissues) was significantly higher in animals that received transduced cells (Figures 2B, 2D) than those that received non-transduced cells (Figure 3A). A comparison of the ratio of radioactivity among the different groups of animals is shown in Figure 4. Significantly increased radioactivity ratios were observed in tumors of the animals that received magnetically labeled transgenic AC133+ cells compared to that of other groups both on days 3 and 7 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in radioactivity observed between days 3 and 7 in animals that received transgenic cells (p-value > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in the accumulated radioactivity in tumors observed among animals that received either labeled or unlabeled non-transgenic AC133+ cells. These findings indicate that the increased accumulation of radioactivity in tumors of animals that received transgenic cells is related to the expression of hNIS in the migrated and incorporated AC133+ cells. The hNIS bearing cells were also confirmed by immunohistochemistry.
Figure 4

Quantitative analysis of the ratio of total radioactivity of tumor and contra-lateral muscle. There was no significant difference between total radioactivity of mice tumors injected by AC133 labeled transduced cells in 3 or 7 days (p-value > 0.05). There was a significant difference between total radioactivity of the tumor with injected ed labeled cells and non-transduced cells for both AC133+ only and AC133+ labeled cells (p-value < 0.05).

Figure 4 reflects our observation of non-specific increased activity of Tc-99m at the site of tumors compared to the contralateral muscle in animals that received either only PBS or non-transduced unlabeled or labeled cells. This non-specific activity might be due to increased blood volume in the tumors and extravasations of Tc-99m. However, this non-specific activity was significantly lower than that found in tumors in animals that received transduced cells.


Experimental results confirmed our hypotheses that magnetically labeled transgenic APCs can be used as cellular probes for MRI and gene carrier systems for breast cancer. Gene delivery vehicle is a key tool in cancer gene therapy. Carrier vehicles are needed for the delivery of therapeutic genes to the target cancer cells. These vehicles should be specifically targeted to the cancer cells. Lack of an appropriate carrier in addition to the infiltrative nature of breast cancer is one of the main limitations of successful breast cancer gene therapy [29]. To control the release of administered viruses into circulation, genetically transformed cells are being considered for gene therapy for different tumors [3035]. Due to its unique property to migrate to the pathological lesions, stem cells are unique vehicles for delivering therapeutic genes to the tumors, especially for glioma [3639]. Rat neural stem cells expressing the cytosine deaminase gene, injected at a site distant from the primary tumor exhibit extensive migration and stable expression of the gene, indicating persistent ability to destroy tumor cells locally as well as distal from the main tumor mass or metastatic foci [40]. Mesenchymal stem cells, pluripotent bone marrow stromal cells, are also used to carry genes to glioma and are considered effective delivery vehicles [39, 4143]. APCs, which are a subpopulation of pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells showed active migration and incorporation into the neovasculatures of tumor when administered locally or systemically [17, 27, 44]. Ferrari et al. [45] have shown the migration and incorporation of HSV-tk transduced mouse APCs in subcutaneous tumor in a mouse model, however, they did not show incorporation of the transduced cells by in vivo imaging. Our results support the findings of previous reports that transgenic stem cells can migrate and accumulate at the sites of implanted tumors [46, 47]. However, the most important aspect of our study was that the transgenic cells were tracked by in vivo imaging (both by MRI and SPECT). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use different imaging modalities to show the migration and accumulation of administered transgenic stem cells. The findings of this proof-of-principle study pave the road for further studies in other tumor models.

In recent years, imaging techniques that enable efficient and non-invasive in vivo monitoring and tracking of transplanted cells have become central to the development of cell transplantation based therapeutic approaches. Recent studies using various disease models demonstrated that MRI can be used as a high resolution imaging technique for in vivo cell tracking [1720]. Furthermore, MRI has been successfully used to track the migration and incorporation of intravenously injected, magnetically labeled APCs into the blood vessels in rodent tumor model [17, 27]. MRI along with the adequate labeling reagent allow for monitoring of the entire time course of APC migration. They also can show possible accumulation of labeled cells in different tissues. In vivo detection and measuring of gene expression using reporter genes is another imaging ability. Reporter gene methods provide a unique opportunity to study biology in living subjects. They also allow for monitoring of physiological events in an intact environment. NIS is a membrane glycoprotein that mediates active iodide uptake in thyroid gland and some other tissues [48]. Human NIS (hNIS) gene expression has been shown with radioisotopes of iodine and Tc-99m-pertechnetate [49]. The hNIS has advantages over other reporter genes such as HSV1-tk and luciferase in that the hNIS gene product is innate and nonimmunogenic. It has limited endogenic tissue-specific expression and can mediate the uptake of chemically simple and available radiopharmaceuticals. We have shown that transduced APCs containing hNIS can easily be tracked and detected using Tc-99m and SPECT. This confirms that our cells are transduced by adenoviral vectors and hNIS is expressed in the APCs at the tumor sites. Tumor histology in addition to MRI analysis confirmed the presence of magnetically labeled and genetically transduced cells at the periphery of tumor where active angiogenesis was observed.

Limitations of this study are as follows. Viability of cells after viral transduction was one limitation, although our results were comparable to other published reports that used viral vectors for transduction of stem cells [50]. The overall transduction efficiency (we showed that 35% of our cells were transduced), even with higher ratio of viral particles, was low in our case using adenoviral vectors because of a limited presence of CAR receptors on hematopoetic cells [51]. However, the transduction was relatively stable for at least 12 days. The use of lentiviral or retroviral vectors would likely have produced more transduced APCs [52]. Future projects will utilize different effective viral vectors for relative stable transduction. We are currently optimizing the virus-to-cell ratio to get more viable cells after transduction and to get higher transduction efficiency. The timing of cell injection is another variable that should be optimized. Multiple injections at different time points in the same animal should also be considered to increase the delivery of genes to the tumor site.

Future Potential

The stem cell gene delivery system has the potential to open a new window to the clinical cancer gene therapy. APCs can be collected from patient's own peripheral blood and bone marrow to avoid the immune system reaction. An important application of our gene delivery system is the delivery of suicidal genes to the cancer cells. In this approach, genes such as HSV-TK/acyclovir (ACV), ganciclovir (GCV), or herpes simplex virus-1-thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) convert a non-toxic pro-drug into a toxic drug. The bystander effect, a main phenomenon in this treatment modality, occurs when neighboring cancer cells, not specifically targeted with the suicidal gene, are also destroyed. The cell-to-cell transfer of phosphorylated GCV via gap junctions between HSV-TK transduced cells and neighboring non-infected cells is the primary mechanism for the bystander effect [5355]. The efficacy of this protocol will be directly related to the gene/pro-drug combination and the target (cancer cells).


MRI and SPECT images showed accumulation of administered APCs in the implanted breast cancer and expression of hNIS gene, respectively. Our study indicates that APCs can carry therapeutic genes even after systemic administration. Genetically transformed, magnetically labeled APCs can be used both as delivery vehicles and cellular probes for detecting in vivo migration and homing of cells by MRI. This method can be used in the future development of gene therapy approaches where genetically modified cells can be tracked in real time and in vivo by MRI in different disease processes.


AC133+ progenitor cells (APCs)

Fresh whole blood was obtained from the cord blood under IRB approved protocol with proper informed consent. Blood was collected in heparinized tubes. The blood was diluted 1:2 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) plus 2 mM EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid), layered onto lymphocyte separation medium (Ficoll, density 1.077 g/ml, ICN Biomedicals, Aurora, OH) and centrifuged for 30 minutes at 1,900 RPM, and at a temperature of 20°C (35 ml blood was very gently added onto 15 ml lymphocyte separation medium in every 50 ml sterile tube). Then, the white ring fraction (mononuclear cell layer) was transferred to a new 50 ml tube using a sterile Pasteur pipette. PBS was added twice and the tubes were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 1500 RPM at room temperature. After discarding the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in 4 ml ACK lysine buffer to get rid of (for lysing) remaining erythrocytes. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were incubated in the ACK lysine buffer for no more than 3 minutes on ice. After 3 minutes, 20 ml PBS was added to the solution, the cells were washed twice (centrifuge at 1200 RPM) with PBS. MNCs were subjected to immunomagnetic separation using AC133 Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech; Auburn, CA;, according to manufacturer's instruction [56, 57]. Briefly, MNCs were incubated for 45 minutes on ice with an FcR-blocking reagent (human IgG) and AC133 MicroBeads. These microbeads are conjugated with monoclonal mouse anti-human antibodies against AC133. After washing with PBS plus 2 mM EDTA, the labeled cells were filtered through a 30-μm nylon mesh and loaded onto a column that was installed in a magnetic field. Trapped cells were eluted after the column was removed from the magnet. The collected cells were named AC133+ progenitor cells (APCs). APCs were grown in stemline II media (Sigma, St. Louise, MO) supplemented with 10 ng/ml of thrombopoietin (TPO), 40 ng/ml of FLT3 and 40 ng/ml of stem cell factor (SCF). Initially, the cells were suspended in media at 1 × 106 per ml and grown in 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C in a humidified incubator with fresh media added on every third day. The cells were propagated for 7–10 days. On the day of labeling, the cells were harvested and resuspended at a concentration of 4 × 106 cells per ml. Collected cells were analyzed at different days in culture for their phenotypical expression. There were gradual declines in the expression of CD133 and CD34, but the majority of cells were positive for CD31, CXCR4 and CD117. Markers of lymphocytic (CD3, CD19) and monocytic (CD14) lineages were absent.

Breast Cancer Cells (MDA-MB-231)

Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, ATCC, VA) were cultured in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 IU/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) until they were 80–90% confluent.

Tumor Implantation

All animal studies were approved by the institutional animal care and user committee at Henry Ford Health System. Female nude mice (total 48 mice) were used for implantation of tumor cells. Tumor cells (human breast cancer), cultured in-vitro were harvested by trypsinization and centrifugation, washed twice with PBS buffer, and then resuspended in cell culture serum free media at a concentration of 6 × 107 cells/ml. The animals received one subcutaneous injection of 50 μl of cell suspension (3 million cells) in the right hind flank. These tumor cells are efficient in making xenografted tumors with almost 90% efficiency and show marked vascularity with less central necrosis. Tumors were measured twice a week after implantation in two dimensions. All animals received intravenous injection of APCs when the tumor measured between 0.5 to 1 cm diameter in the largest dimension.

Transduction of APCs with Adenoviral Vector Containing HSV-tk and hNIS Genes

An adenoviral vector carrying either the hNIS or EGFP gene was used to transduce cells (Figure 5). Both vectors also contained the HSV-tk gene, which can be used as a suicidal gene for therapeutic purposes. hNIS and EGFP acted as reporter genes and their activities were determined by Tc-99m pertechnetate (Tc-99m) SPECT and flowcytometer, respectively. Cell to viral particle ratio was maintained at 1:1000. Cells were at a concentration of 10 million per ml for initial 1 hour and then diluted ×10 with complete culture media. Transduction efficiency was determined on day 3 by flowcytometric analysis (using EGFP as reporter gene) and fluorescent microscope. These transgenic cells were magnetically (FePro) labeled on day 4 after transduction.
Figure 5

Adenovirus design to detect transfected efficiency by flowcytometric (EGFP) and nuclear medicine (hNIS using Tc-99m) techniques. This figure is printed with the permission of Kenneth N Barton from the Radiation Oncology Department of Henry Ford Hospital.

Labeling of Cells with Ferumoxide-Protamine Sulfate (FePro) Complex

The commercially available, FDA-approved SPIO, ferumoxide suspension, (Feridex IV ®, Berlex Laboratories, Inc, Wayne, New Jersey) contains particles approximately 80–150 nm in size and has a total iron content of 11.2 mg/ml. Protamine sulfate (American Pharmaceuticals Partner Inc. Schaumburg, IL), supplied at 10 mg/ml, was prepared as a fresh stock solution of 1 mg/ml in distilled water at the time of use. Ferumoxide, at a concentration of 100 μg/ml, was put into a mixing flask or tube containing serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (Biosource, Camarillo, CA) containing non-essential amino acid, sodium pyruvate, and L-glutamine. Protamine sulfate was then added to the solution at a concentration of 3–4.5 μg/ml of mixing media. The solution containing ferumoxide and protamine sulfate was mixed for 30 seconds with intermittent hand shakings. After 30 seconds, the FePro complex was added directly to the cells, incubated for 2–3 hours, and then an equal volume of the complete medium was added to the cells, for a final concentration of 50 μg ferumoxide/ml of medium. The cell suspension was then incubated overnight. After overnight incubation, the cells were washed three times and then resuspended in PBS.

Measuring Intracellular Iron

Intracellular iron concentration was measured based on our previously published method by UV/VIS spectrophotometry [58]. In brief, cell suspensions with known cell density were demineralized in 1 ml of 5 Mol/L hydrochloric acid for 4 hours. Then, the color of the mixture was read with a UV/VIS spectrometer at 351 nm wave-length. The absorption value was normalized to a standard curve generated from a known solution of ferumoxide. To determine the very low concentration of iron in the sample, the iron concentration was measured using this method and is expressed as an average picogram of iron/cell. Currently, this method is used in our laboratory to determine the very low concentration of iron in the sample. The commercially available kit for measuring iron concentration was not sensitive enough to detect such low iron concentrations (< 1 μg/ml).

Determination of Labeling Efficiency

After incubation with FePro, the cells were washed 3 times in the presence of heparin sulfate to remove excess FePro and transferred to cytospin slides. Cells were fixed and stained with Perl's reagent for Prussian blue (PB) staining. FePro labeling efficiency was determined by manually counting PB stained and unstained cells using a microscope at 40× magnification. Cells were considered PB positive if intracytoplasmic blue granules were detected. The percentage of labeled cells was determined from the average of 5–10 high-powered fields.

Cellular viability of FE-Pro labeled cells

After labeling, the cells were washed at least twice with sterile PBS and then resuspended in PBS at a concentration of 3 × 107 cells/ml. A small aliquot of cells were mixed with trypan blue dye and checked under a microscope to determine cell viability.

Intravenous Administration of hNIS Transduced and FePro Labeled APCs

Either hNIS transduced and FePro labeled APCs or control APCs (without transduction and labeling) were administered intravenously into tail vein of mouse when the tumor grew to 0.5 cm in size (along the largest dimension). A total of three million APCs in 200 μl was administered intravenously. Following administration of APCs, mice underwent MRI and Tc-99m SPECT scanning to determine the migration and accumulation of FePro labeled and transgenic (containing hNIS) cells, respectively, on days 3 and 7 after cell administration.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study


Anesthesia was induced and maintained during all MRI studies using an inhalation mixture of isoflurane (3% for induction and 0.5–1.5% for maintenance) in a 2:1 N2O/O2 gas mixture, with the animal breathing spontaneously. After induction, the animal was placed in a custom made MRI compatible Plexiglas holder that was equipped a nose cone for the delivery of gasses and a heating pad. After securing the animal's nose inside the mask, the hindquarters of the animal were positioned and secured to the holder, a rectal probe was inserted for temperature monitoring, and the holder was placed inside the imaging coil. Next, the animal holder/imaging coil assembly was placed inside the magnet, isoflurane was reduced to 0.5–1.5%, and the animal's core temperature maintained at 37°C using a feedback controlled water bath.

MRI Systems

MRI experiments were conducted using either a 7 Tesla (7 T) or a 3 Tesla (3 T) MRI system. The 7 T system is a 12 cm (clear bore) magnet (Magnex Scientific, Inc., Abingdon, UK) interfaced to a Bruker console (Bruker Biospin MRI, Inc, Billerica, MA) with actively shielded gradients of 25 gauss/cm and 100 μs rise time. A 5 cm diameter quadrature birdcage RF coil tuned to 300 MHz is used for RF transmission and reception. The 3 T system is a whole body magnet (Signa Excite, GE health, Milwaukee, WI) that uses dedicated small animal coils (Doty scientific) for animal imaging. Once inside the magnet, the position of the animal was adjusted so that the central imaging slice coincided with the center of the tumor.

T2 Measurement using 7 T System

Multi-slice T2-weighted images were acquired using a multi-echo spin-echo sequence with a fixed repetition time (TR) and progressively incremented echo times (TE) [TR/TE = 3000/12, 24, 36, 48 ms]. Imaging parameters were as follows: FOV = 32 mm, matrix = 256 × 256, 17 slices (interleaved slice acquisition), slice thickness = 1 mm. The total scan time was approximately 13 minutes.

Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) using 7 T System

This is a specialized 3D gradient-echo sequence, very sensitive to the presence of iron and can detect iron labeled cells. The method uses TR/TE = 50 ms/6.7 ms, flip angle = 15 degrees, BW = 50 KHz, 32 × 32 × 16 mm3 FOV, 256 × 256 × 64 matrix (resolution of 125 × 125 × 250 mm3), 2 averages with flow compensation applied in all three directions. The total scan time for this 3D data set was approximately 27 minutes.

T2 Measurement using 3 T System

Multi-slice T2 images were acquired using a Carr, Purcell, Meiboom, and Gill (CPMG) multi-echo spin-echo sequence with a fixed repetition time (TR) and progressively incremented echo times (TE) [TR/TE = 2400/15, 30, 45, 60 ms]. The imaging parameters were as follows: FOV = 35 mm, matrix = 160 × 128, averages = 3, 15 slices, slice thickness = 1 mm. The total scan time was approximately 5 minutes.

T2* Measurements using 3 T System

Multi-slice T2* images were acquired using a multi-echo gradient-echo sequence with a fixed repetition time (TR) and progressively incremented echo times (TE) [TR/TE = 600/10, 15, 20, 30 ms]. The imaging parameters were as follows: FOV = 35 mm, matrix = 160 × 128, averages = 4, 15 slices, slice thickness = 1 mm. The total scan time was approximately 8 minutes.

FIESTA using 3 T System

This is a specialized 3D gradient-echo sequence, very sensitive to the presence of iron and can detect iron labeled cells. The method uses TR/TE = 11–15 ms/3–7 ms, flip angle = 40 degrees, BW = 10 kHz, 60 × 60 × 40 mm3 FOV, 300 × 300 × 200 matrix (resolution of 200 × 200 × 200 mm3), 2 averages. The total scan time for this 3D data set was approximately 15 minutes.


Within 24 hours after MRI, animals underwent SPECT studies using Tc-99m to determine the status of genetically transformed cells at the sites of tumors. Animals were anesthetized using ketamine/xylazine (100/15 mg/kg) and received 1 mCi of Tc-99m through tail vein injection in a volume of 200 μl. 60 minutes after Tc-99m injection, animals were wrapped with padded sheet to keep them warm and placed in the imaging holder under anesthesia. SPECT images were acquired with a dedicated PRISM 3000 gamma camera fitted with mutli-pinhole mouse collimator, 360 degree rotation with 36 degree increments, 180 sec per projection, using 256 × 256 matrices with a field of view of 4 × 6 cm. The total time required for acquiring SPECT images was about 31 minutes.

Euthanasia and Histological Analysis

Immediately after SPECT imaging, the animals were anesthetized using pentobarbital (100 mg/kg intravenous or intraperitoneal) and sacrificed. The tissues were fixed for histological analysis by perfusion with saline, for vascular washout, followed by paraformaldehyde. The radioactive fluids were collected and contained in a shielded area to decay. The animals were euthanized either with 100 mg/kg of pentobarbital administration (intravenous or intraperitoneal). The whole tumor and part of surrounding tissues (muscles and skin) were collected for histochemical determination of iron labeled cells using PB staining and markers of endothelial cells, such as CD31 and vWF using human specific antibodies (BD Pharmingen and DakoCytomation respectively). Expression of hNIS in accumulated cells was determined by staining with anti-hNIS antibody (Genetex, TX, USA).

Study Design

There were four groups of animals (n = 6/group) for each time point (days 3 and 7 after IV administration of cells): 1) controls injected with PBS: 2) tumors injected with unlabeled APCs; 3) tumors injected with magnetically labeled APCs; and 4) tumors injected with transduced and magnetically labeled APCs. The total number of animals used in the study was 48.

Image and Statistical Analysis

Eigentool image analysis software (Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA) was used to analyze MRI images. Eigentool has a comprehensive set of functions for displaying, restoring, enhancing, and analyzing images [5961]. Statistical analysis of SPECT images was performed with SPSS software (version 13; SPSS Institute Inc.) for Microsoft Windows. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and general linear models. The significance level was set at 0.05 and statistical analysis of the tumor-to-muscle ratio was performed with constructed SPECT images. ImageJ software was also used for SPECT analysis. Tumor volume was defined on the SPECT images by drawing ROIs around the tumor on each slice and the total activity was recorded. The same volume was used to compute the total activity from the contra-lateral muscle region.

The percentage of change in the total activity (ΔTa%) was calculated using:

ΔTa% = 100 × (TaT-TaM)/TaM

where TaT is the total activity of the tumor and TaM is the total activity of the contralateral muscle for the same volume as that of the tumor.



AC133+ progenitor cells


superparamagnetic iron oxide


Magnetic resonance imaging


human sodium iodide symporter


ferumoxides-protamine sulfate


single photon emission computed tomography


Food and Drug Administration


phosphate buffered saline


Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid


thrombopoietin, SCF: stem cell factor


Mononuclear cells


Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium


Prussian blue






herpes simplex virus-1-thymidine kinase


Enhanced Green Fluorescent Proteins.



This work was supported in part by the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program under grant number W81XWH-06-1-0576 and by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grant numbers EB002450, CA122031, and NS058589.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital
Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran


  1. Uray IP, Brown PH: Prevention of breast cancer: current state of the science and future opportunities. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2006, 15 (12): 1583-1600.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, CD001877-4Google Scholar
  3. Bergman I, Griffin JA, Gao Y, Whitaker-Dowling P: Treatment of implanted mammary tumors with recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus targeted to Her2/neu. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121 (2): 425-430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan T, Sami A, El-Gayed A, Guo X, Xiang J: HER-2/neu-gene engineered dendritic cell vaccine stimulates stronger HER-2/neu-specific immune responses compared to DNA vaccination. Gene therapy. 2006, 13 (19): 1391-1402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Israyelyan AH, Melancon JM, Lomax LG, Sehgal I, Leuschner C, Kearney MT, Chouljenko VN, Baghian A, Kousoulas KG: Effective treatment of human breast tumor in a mouse xenograft model with herpes simplex virus type 1 specifying the NV1020 genomic deletion and the gBsyn3 syncytial mutation enabling high viral replication and spread in breast cancer cells. Human gene therapy. 2007, 18 (5): 457-473.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kommareddy S, Amiji M: Antiangiogenic gene therapy with systemically administered sFlt-1 plasmid DNA in engineered gelatin-based nanovectors. Cancer gene therapy. 2007, 14 (5): 488-498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lim SJ, Paeng JC, Kim SJ, Kim SY, Lee H, Moon DH: Enhanced expression of adenovirus-mediated sodium iodide symporter gene in MCF-7 breast cancer cells with retinoic acid treatment. J Nucl Med. 2007, 48 (3): 398-404.Google Scholar
  8. Magnusson MK, Henning P, Myhre S, Wikman M, Uil TG, Friedman M, Andersson KM, Hong SS, Hoeben RC, Habib NA, et al: Adenovirus 5 vector genetically re-targeted by an Affibody molecule with specificity for tumor antigen HER2/neu. Cancer gene therapy. 2007, 14 (5): 468-479.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pastorakova A, Hlubinova K, Altaner C: Treatment of human tumor cells by combine gene therapy harnessing plasmids expressing human tumor necrosis factor alpha and bacterial cytosine deaminase suicide gene. Neoplasma. 2006, 53 (6): 478-484.Google Scholar
  10. Stoff-Khalili MA, Dall P, Curiel DT: Gene therapy for carcinoma of the breast. Cancer gene therapy. 2006, 13 (7): 633-647.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Takahashi S, Ito Y, Hatake K, Sugimoto Y: Gene therapy for breast cancer. – Review of clinical gene therapy trials for breast cancer and MDR1 gene therapy trial in Cancer Institute Hospital. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2006, 13 (1): 8-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Takahashi S, Sugimoto Y: [Gene therapy for breast cancer]. Nippon Rinsho. 2007, 65 (Suppl 6): 135-141.Google Scholar
  13. Ebert O, Harbaran S, Shinozaki K, Woo SL: Systemic therapy of experimental breast cancer metastases by mutant vesicular stomatitis virus in immune-competent mice. Cancer gene therapy. 2005, 12 (4): 350-358.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadal F, Bastias J, Wei MX, Crepin M: "Suicide" gene therapy of breast cancer cells is only cytostatic in vitro but anti-tumoral in vivo on breast MCF7-ras tumor. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2004, 18 (6): 813-818.Google Scholar
  15. Gomez-Navarro J, Contreras JL, Arafat W, Jiang XL, Krisky D, Oligino T, Marconi P, Hubbard B, Glorioso JC, Curiel DT, et al: Genetically modified CD34+ cells as cellular vehicles for gene delivery into areas of angiogenesis in a rhesus model. Gene therapy. 2000, 7 (1): 43-52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Morizono K, De Ugarte DA, Zhu M, Zuk P, Elbarbary A, Ashjian P, Benhaim P, Chen IS, Hedrick MH: Multilineage cells from adipose tissue as gene delivery vehicles. Human gene therapy. 2003, 14 (1): 59-66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Anderson SA, Glod J, Arbab AS, Noel M, Ashari P, Fine HA, Frank JA: Noninvasive MR imaging of magnetically labeled stem cells to directly identify neovasculature in a glioma model. Blood. 2005, 105 (1): 420-425.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Anderson SA, Shukaliak-Quandt J, Jordan EK, Arbab AS, Martin R, McFarland H, Frank JA: Magnetic resonance imaging of labeled T-cells in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2004, 55 (5): 654-659.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Arbab AS, Jordan EK, Wilson LB, Yocum GT, Lewis BK, Frank JA: In vivo trafficking and targeted delivery of magnetically labeled stem cells. Human gene therapy. 2004, 15 (4): 351-360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Arbab AS, Liu W, Frank JA: Cellular magnetic resonance imaging: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006, 3 (4): 427-439.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank JA, Anderson SA, Kalsih H, Jordan EK, Lewis BK, Yocum GT, Arbab AS: Methods for magnetically labeling stem and other cells for detection by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cytotherapy. 2004, 6 (6): 621-625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Frank JA, Miller BR, Arbab AS, Zywicke HA, Jordan EK, Lewis BK, Bryant LH, Bulte JW: Clinically applicable labeling of mammalian and stem cells by combining superparamagnetic iron oxides and transfection agents. Radiology. 2003, 228 (2): 480-487.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Stark DD, Weissleder R, Elizondo G, Hahn PF, Saini S, Todd LE, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT: Superparamagnetic iron oxide: clinical application as a contrast agent for MR imaging of the liver. Radiology. 1988, 168 (2): 297-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Weissleder R, Hahn PF, Stark DD, Elizondo G, Saini S, Todd LE, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT: Superparamagnetic iron oxide: enhanced detection of focal splenic tumors with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988, 169 (2): 399-403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Rad AM, Arbab AS, Iskander AS, Jiang Q, Soltanian-Zadeh H: Quantification of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-labeled cells using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007, 26 (2): 366-374.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Rad AM, Khakoo AY, Fellowes V, Read EJ, Frank JA: Labeling of cells with ferumoxides-protamine sulfate complexes does not inhibit function or differentiation capacity of hematopoietic or mesenchymal stem cells. NMR Biomed. 2005, 18 (8): 553-559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Arbab AS, Pandit SD, Anderson SA, Yocum GT, Bur M, Frenkel V, Khuu HM, Read EJ, Frank JA: Magnetic resonance imaging and confocal microscopy studies of magnetically labeled endothelial progenitor cells trafficking to sites of tumor angiogenesis. Stem Cells. 2006, 24 (3): 671-678.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yao C, Lin Y, Ye CS, Bi J, Zhu YF, Wang SM: Role of interleukin-8 in the progression of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Chinese medical journal. 2007, 120 (20): 1766-1772.Google Scholar
  29. Ogan D: GeneABAAN WEC: Therapy in Human Breast Cancer. Turk J Med Sci. 2002, 32: 283-291.Google Scholar
  30. Arafat WO, Casado E, Wang M, Alvarez RD, Siegal GP, Glorioso JC, Curiel DT, Gomez-Navarro J: Genetically modified CD34+ cells exert a cytotoxic bystander effect on human endothelial and cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6 (11): 4442-4448.Google Scholar
  31. Wei J, Blum S, Unger M, Jarmy G, Lamparter M, Geishauser A, Vlastos GA, Chan G, Fischer KD, Rattat D, et al: Embryonic endothelial progenitor cells armed with a suicide gene target hypoxic lung metastases after intravenous delivery. Cancer cell. 2004, 5 (5): 477-488.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Komarova S, Kawakami Y, Stoff-Khalili MA, Curiel DT, Pereboeva L: Mesenchymal progenitor cells as cellular vehicles for delivery of oncolytic adenoviruses. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2006, 5 (3): 755-766.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Muta M, Matsumoto G, Hiruma K, Nakashima E, Toi M: Study of cancer gene therapy using IL-12-secreting endothelial progenitor cells in a rat solid tumor model. Oncology reports. 2003, 10 (6): 1765-1769.Google Scholar
  34. Arap W, Pasqualini R: Engineered embryonic endothelial progenitor cells as therapeutic Trojan horses. Cancer cell. 2004, 5 (5): 406-408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Saxena A, Zheng C, Carlsen S, Xiang J: Combined alpha tumor necrosis factor gene therapy and engineered dendritic cell vaccine in combating well-established tumors. The journal of gene medicine. 2004, 6 (8): 857-868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Aboody KS, Brown A, Rainov NG, Bower KA, Liu S, Yang W, Small JE, Herrlinger U, Ourednik V, Black PM, et al: Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: evidence from intracranial gliomas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000, 97 (23): 12846-12851.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ourednik V, Ourednik J, Park KI, Teng YD, Aboody KA, Auguste KI, Taylor RM, Tate BA, Snyder EY: Neural stem cells are uniquely suited for cell replacement and gene therapy in the CNS. Novartis Foundation symposium. 2000, 231: 242-262. discussion 262-249, 302-246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Brown AB, Yang W, Schmidt NO, Carroll R, Leishear KK, Rainov NG, Black PM, Breakefield XO, Aboody KS: Intravascular delivery of neural stem cell lines to target intracranial and extracranial tumors of neural and non-neural origin. Human gene therapy. 2003, 14 (18): 1777-1785.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakamura K, Ito Y, Kawano Y, Kurozumi K, Kobune M, Tsuda H, Bizen A, Honmou O, Niitsu Y, Hamada H: Antitumor effect of genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells in a rat glioma model. Gene therapy. 2004, 11 (14): 1155-1164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Aboody KS, Najbauer J, Schmidt NO, Yang W, Wu JK, Zhuge Y, Przylecki W, Carroll R, Black PM, Perides G: Targeting of melanoma brain metastases using engineered neural stem/progenitor cells. Neuro-oncology. 2006, 8 (2): 119-126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamada H, Kobune M, Nakamura K, Kawano Y, Kato K, Honmou O, Houkin K, Matsunaga T, Niitsu Y: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) as therapeutic cytoreagents for gene therapy. Cancer science. 2005, 96 (3): 149-156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Schichor C, Birnbaum T, Etminan N, Schnell O, Grau S, Miebach S, Aboody K, Padovan C, Straube A, Tonn JC, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor A contributes to glioma-induced migration of human marrow stromal cells (hMSC). Experimental neurology. 2006, 199 (2): 301-310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakamizo A, Marini F, Amano T, Khan A, Studeny M, Gumin J, Chen J, Hentschel S, Vecil G, Dembinski J, et al: Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of gliomas. Cancer research. 2005, 65 (8): 3307-3318.Google Scholar
  44. Moore XL, Lu J, Sun L, Zhu CJ, Tan P, Wong MC: Endothelial progenitor cells' "homing" specificity to brain tumors. Gene therapy. 2004, 11 (10): 811-818.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ferrari N, Glod J, Lee J, Kobiler D, Fine HA: Bone marrow-derived, endothelial progenitor-like cells as angiogenesis-selective gene-targeting vectors. Gene therapy. 2003, 10 (8): 647-656.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sonabend AM, Ulasov IV, Tyler MA, Rivera AA, Mathis JM, Lesniak MS: Mesenchymal stem cells effectively deliver an oncolytic adenovirus to intracranial glioma. Stem Cells. 2008, 26 (3): 831-841.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Deng W, Jia J: Endothelial progenitor cells as cellular vehicles to deliver oncolytic virus therapies to metastatic tumors: the "Trojan horse" approach. Medical hypotheses. 2008, 70 (4): 842-844.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Dohan O, De la Vieja A, Paroder V, Riedel C, Artani M, Reed M, Ginter CS, Carrasco N: The sodium/iodide Symporter (NIS): characterization, regulation, and medical significance. Endocrine reviews. 2003, 24 (1): 48-77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Schipper ML, Riese CG, Seitz S, Weber A, Behe M, Schurrat T, Schramm N, Keil B, Alfke H, Behr TM: Efficacy of 99mTc pertechnetate and 131I radioisotope therapy in sodium/iodide symporter (NIS)-expressing neuroendocrine tumors in vivo. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2007, 34 (5): 638-650.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Lundqvist A, Noffz G, Pavlenko M, Saeboe-Larssen S, Fong T, Maitland N, Pisa P: Nonviral and viral gene transfer into different subsets of human dendritic cells yield comparable efficiency of transfection. J Immunother. 2002, 25 (6): 445-454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Shayakhmetov DM, Papayannopoulou T, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Lieber A: Efficient gene transfer into human CD34(+) cells by a retargeted adenovirus vector. Journal of virology. 2000, 74 (6): 2567-2583.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Kohn DB: Gene therapy using hematopoietic stem cells. Current opinion in molecular therapeutics. 1999, 1 (4): 437-442.Google Scholar
  53. Yamasaki H, Katoh F: Further evidence for the involvement of gap-junctional intercellular communication in induction and maintenance of transformed foci in BALB/c 3T3 cells. Cancer research. 1988, 48 (12): 3490-3495.Google Scholar
  54. Wu JK, Cano WG, Meylaerts SA, Qi P, Vrionis F, Cherington V: Bystander tumoricidal effect in the treatment of experimental brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 1994, 35 (6): 1094-1102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Freeman SM, Abboud CN, Whartenby KA, Packman CH, Koeplin DS, Moolten FL, Abraham GN: The "bystander effect": tumor regression when a fraction of the tumor mass is genetically modified. Cancer research. 1993, 53 (21): 5274-5283.Google Scholar
  56. Yasui K, Matsumoto K, Hirayama F, Tani Y, Nakano T: Differences between peripheral blood and cord blood in the kinetics of lineage-restricted hematopoietic cells: implications for delayed platelet recovery following cord blood transplantation. Stem Cells. 2003, 21 (2): 143-151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Matsumoto K, Yasui K, Yamashita N, Horie Y, Yamada T, Tani Y, Shibata H, Nakano T: In vitro proliferation potential of AC133 positive cells in peripheral blood. Stem Cells. 2000, 18 (3): 196-203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Rad AM, Janic B, Iskander AS, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Arbab AS: Measurement of quantity of iron in magnetically labeled cells: comparison among different UV/VIS spectrometric methods. BioTechniques. 2007, 43 (5): 627-628. 630, 632 passim.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham JP, Peck DJ: Optimal linear transformation for MRI feature extraction. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 1996, 15 (6): 749-767.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham JP, Peck DJ, Yagle AE: A comparative analysis of several transformations for enhancement and segmentation of magnetic resonance image scene sequences. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 1992, 11 (3): 302-318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Jacobs MA, Windham JP, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Peck DJ, Knight RA: Registration and warping of magnetic resonance images to histological sections. Medical physics. 1999, 26 (8): 1568-1578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Rad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.