A simple viability analysis for unicellular cyanobacteria using a new autofluorescence assay, automated microscopy, and ImageJ
© Schulze et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 27 September 2011
Accepted: 30 November 2011
Published: 30 November 2011
Currently established methods to identify viable and non-viable cells of cyanobacteria are either time-consuming (eg. plating) or preparation-intensive (eg. fluorescent staining). In this paper we present a new and fast viability assay for unicellular cyanobacteria, which uses red chlorophyll fluorescence and an unspecific green autofluorescence for the differentiation of viable and non-viable cells without the need of sample preparation.
The viability assay for unicellular cyanobacteria using red and green autofluorescence was established and validated for the model organism Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Both autofluorescence signals could be observed simultaneously allowing a direct classification of viable and non-viable cells. The results were confirmed by plating/colony count, absorption spectra and chlorophyll measurements. The use of an automated fluorescence microscope and a novel ImageJ based image analysis plugin allow a semi-automated analysis.
The new method simplifies the process of viability analysis and allows a quick and accurate analysis. Furthermore results indicate that a combination of the new assay with absorption spectra or chlorophyll concentration measurements allows the estimation of the vitality of cells.
The last couple of years have shown an increased research interest in microalgae and cyanobacteria, especially in the field of biofuels. Therefore simple and fast culture monitoring methods to determine the viability of the cells are needed.
As a simple method for the monitoring of fitness, absorption spectra give an overview of the amount of pigments and their distribution in the culture. Also the chlorophyll concentration (and the chlorophyll-concentration/OD750) can be used to analyze the culture condition . Nevertheless, both methods only allow the quantification of growth and viability on the culture level, giving an average over all cells, but not a quantification of the viable cells. A differentiation of viable and non-viable cells on a cell by cell level allows for a causal evaluation of cell viability in regard to changing conditions, such as stress, cell aging or respiration rate. The standard method for the determining of cell viability is plating of the culture and subsequent counting of the colonies. This method however, requires plate preparation and at least one week until colonies can be identified. An alternative method for the determination of cell viability is fluorescent staining. In a dual-fluorescence assay the autofluorescence of chlorophyll is used to identify viable cells, and the fluorescent dye SYTOX Green is used to identify non-viable cells . Although staining is faster than plating, it is vastly more expensive, and there is still need for culture preparation. For an automation of fluorescent staining, a flow cytometric approach for Microcystis has been previously reported . The automation of the viability analysis via flow cytometry has the advantage of being less time consuming and more reliable. Nevertheless staining of the sample is still required. In contrast, the method presented in this paper could be adapted for use with flow cytometry and would allow the differentiation of viable cells without any sample preparation.
The new method is a fast and simple alternative using red chlorophyll fluorescence and an unspecific green autofluorescence for the determination of cell viability. Red autofluorescence of chlorophyll is only present in viable cells. For higher plants and filamentous cyanobacteria it is known, that there is a steady state between the building and degradation of chlorophyll. Senescence or dying results in a switch from equilibrium (with high turnover) to a massive degradation of chlorophyll [4, 5]. Therefore the red autofluorescence fades and a green unspecific fluorescence, which can be observed at the same excitation wavelength but is superimposed by the red chlorophyll fluorescence in viable cells, becomes visible. This green fluorescence has mostly been described in higher plants and is caused by a variety of different molecules like flavonoids, flavins (e.g. FAD), cinnamic acids (e.g. ferulic acid), betaxanthine and pyridine nucleotides [e.g. NAD(P)H]. For algae this phenomenon has barely been analyzed and the molecules responsible for the green autofluorescence are mostly unidentified [6, 7].
Nevertheless this effect allows one to distinguish between viable and non-viable cells (For this method non-viable cells are defined as cells that still show an intact cell shape but have lost the ability for growth and/or division.) at the same excitation frequency. By the use of a long pass filter for the emission wavelength both fluorescent signals can be observed simultaneously. A direct determination of the number of viable and non-viable cells is now possible without any sample preparation.
By the use of an automated fluorescence microscope and subsequent analysis of the generated images, an automated procedure for the determination of cell viability was created. For the image analysis, a plugin was written for ImageJ, an Open Source project which allows easy expansion [8, 9]. The plugin enables the determination of the total cell concentration and the number of viable and non-viable cells by counting fluorescent cells and classing them by color.
We tested the red-green fluorescence assay for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, as it is a model for cyanobacteria and photoautotroph organisms in general . The results for the automated viability analysis via ImageJ were validated with values obtained by plating, chlorophyll-measurement, and the analysis of the absorption spectra. Furthermore a temperature stressed Synechocystis culture was analyzed with the fluorescence assay and absorption spectroscopy. Results were compared with those of the viable culture, to test the applicability for a vitality analysis. Additionally the automated determination of the cell concentration by the plugin was investigated and compared to the optical density at 750 nm, which is often used to determine cell concentration for unicellular cyanobacteria.
Samples with 5*107 cells per ml, but different ratios of viable to non-viable cells were created. The percentage of viable cells and the total cell count per ml was then determined with the presented fluorescence method. Additionally the viable cell count via plating, chlorophyll content, the absorption spectra, and OD750 were determined for every sample to compare them to the results obtained with the new method.
Fluorescence microscopy for viability analysis
The calculated concentration corresponded well to the adjusted cell count of 5*107 cells/ml for the mixed samples containing 25%, 50% and 75% of viable cells. Samples containing 0% and 100% viable cells showed a significant difference to the expected cell count of 5*107 cells/ml and were in a range between 5.57 * 107 - 6.65 * 107 cells/ml (Figure 2b).
Applied vitality analysis on a cell by cell basis
Absorption spectra give a good overview over the content of pigments in the culture and are therefore used to determine the vitality of cultures. Nevertheless there can be different conditions of a culture that would result in the same absorption spectra. For example a culture with only stressed but viable cells could result in the same spectra as a culture that consists of a heterogeneous mix of unstressed viable and non-viable cells. Therefore an experiment was performed to test if a combination of absorption spectra and the new viability assay can be used to determine how many cells are contributing to the total pigmentation measured trough absorption. Thus allowing an estimation of the average pigmentation of the viable cells.
In this paper a new cell-viability fluorescence assay, which uses chlorophyll autofluorescence of viable cells and an unspecific green autofluorescence of non-viable cells, is presented for Synechocystis. It is a very simple and fast method without sample preparation or long growing phase for an immediate and direct analysis at the cellular level. Compared to staining methods it allows a more accurate analysis since contaminants (e.g. heterotrophic bacteria) in different cultures (data not shown) showed no fluorescent signal at the used excitation wavelength and are therefore not included in the analysis.
To validate the new method, results were compared to plating, chlorophyll concentration and absorption spectra, which are common methods for the determination of culture or cell viability. The strong correlation (R2 = 0.995) between the percentage of viable cells as determined by the newly established autofluorescence method, and the number determined by plating confirm the results obtained with our method and show that an accurate viability analysis is possible.
The absorption spectra and chlorophyll concentration also matched the results of the viability analysis via fluorescence. The spectra for the culture, consisting only of non-viable cells, clearly shows that no photo pigments are present; therefore the green autofluorescence must be caused by other molecules. Additionally the sample consisting only of viable cells showed the highest peaks in the absorption spectra and concentration for chlorophyll.
These results seem to indicate that both, absorption spectra or chlorophyll concentration, can also be used for a quantification of viable cells. The measured values however are an average of all cells in the culture; therefore there is no distinction between part of the population dying or each cell reducing its pigment content while remaining viable. During cultivation there can be a number of different factors which lead to chlorophyll decrease within each cell . Possible reasons include environmental factors such as high light stress or dying of a part of the population because of aging. Therefore absorption spectra and chlorophyll concentration are not suited for the analysis of the number of viable cells. This can only be achieved by a cell based approach like the presented fluorescence assay.
As mentioned before, the absorption spectra and the chlorophyll concentration give a good quantitative overview over the total amount of pigments in the culture. A combination with the newly developed binary method seems sensible. A comparison between the absorption spectra of a temperature stressed and an unstressed culture shows a much higher pigmentation for the unstressed culture, although the new viability assay shows a difference of the number of viable cells of only 9%. This indicates that the second culture has much lower pigment content per viable cell and these viable cells are therefore less vital (In this work the vitality of a culture/cell is defined as pigment content per culture/cell, since cyanobacteria show bleaching effects when they are grown under stressful culture conditions.). These results show that a combination of the new developed method and absorption spectra allows a more accurate quantification of the level of vitality of the culture. The combination of both methods makes it possible to determine the average pigmentation of the viable cells, since one can estimate the number of cells which are contributing to the overall signal measured photometrically.
Additionally cell counting results were compared to OD750 values of the different samples. The optical density is often used to determine the cell concentration of the culture. Our results however showed that although all samples had the same cell concentration, the OD750 values decreased with a decreasing viability of the culture. For the culture containing only non-viable cells the total cell concentration was underestimated by about 30% when using only OD750. This is probably caused by the loss of pigmentation, which results in changed absorption and light scattering characteristics of the culture. These findings indicate that a direct determination of the concentration via cell counting should be used when exact values are needed, since the relation between optical density and concentration is limited by the pigmentation of the cells.
The analysis of the cell concentrations with the presented automated cell counting showed significant differences to the expected cell count for the samples containing only viable and non-viable cells. These discrepancies are probably due to errors in the initial cell counting used for the dilution to a cell count of 5 * 107 cells, as this counting was made by hand to allow validation of the automated method. The samples consisting of mixtures of the viable and non-viable samples, showed concentrations that corresponded well to the expected cell count.
In conclusion the newly developed method enables a quick and accurate quantification of viable and non-viable cells for Synechocystis. The method requires no staining and has virtually no costs in addition to the needed equipment. Results are obtained immediately, and match those obtained by (time consuming) plating. Beside the quantification of viable and non-viable cells, results indicate that one also can estimate the vitality of cells (e.g. via the course of a batch cultivation or before and after stressing conditions) by combining this method with absorption spectra or chlorophyll concentration measurements.
An adaptation of the auto fluorescence assay to a flow cytometer should also be possible. Beyond those of the possibility for an automated viability analysis of chlorophyll containing organisms without any staining, this would also allow the sorting in viable and non-viable cells (with a FACS). This could for example help to fasten the process of culture optimization.
Strain and culture conditions
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 was grown in BG11 medium (17,65 mM NaNO3, 0,18 mM K2HPO4 * 3H2O, 0,03 mM Citric acid, 0,003 mM EDTA (disodium magnesium), 0,19 mM Na2CO3, 0,03 mM Ferric ammonium citrate and trace metals) in a T75 tissue culture flask. Cultivation was in a Minitron shaker (INFORS HT) with photosynthesis lights at 35°C, 55 rpm and a continuous illumination of 20 μE/m2. The culture was kept in log growth phase by dilution.
Preparation of viable and non-viable cells
A viable Synechocystis culture was split in two samples of 20 ml and OD750 = 2. To obtain non-viable cells, one sample was incubated at 60°C on a heated magnetic stirrer. The incubation was performed for 5 days in a closed Schott flask. The second sample was cultivated as previously described. The viable and non-viable culture was then counted in a Helber counting chamber to adjust the cell concentration to 5*107cells per ml. Additionally the cultures were mixed in ratios of 1:0; 4:1; 2:1; 1:4 and 0:1.
Semiautomated fluorescence microscopy for viability analysis
Cells were analyzed using a Helber counting chamber. To reduce cell movement within the chamber, the culture was mixed 1:2 with glycerol (99.5%, p.a.). Pretests with glycerol showed no influence to the cells and the fluorescence signal (data not shown). For image acquisition the automated Keyence BZ 9000 microscope and a chlorophyll fluorescence filter set (excitation: 435/40 nm; beam splitter: 510 nm; emission: 515 nm long-pass) were used. To enable a robust automated cell analysis, images were taken outside of the counting grid. Using the automated scanning module of the Keyence BZ II Viewer software, pictures of viable and non-viable fluorescence and phase contrast were taken for a volume of 0.084 μl. Four predefined corners of a square were focused by hand; using the "AutoRangePhoto" function of the software the focal points for all positions within the square were then extrapolated and pictures taken automatically.
For the automated viability analysis and cell counting, a plugin for ImageJ was written which is available in Additional file 1. To segment all cells from the background the fluorescent images were converted in a RGB-image stack. Afterwards automated thresholding with the "MaxEntropy" method  was used separately for both the red and green channel. Both images were combined and the cells were registered using the "Particle Analyzer" method . Registered particles smaller then 35 μm2 were excluded from the analysis to eliminate the influence of artefacts, which occurred due to image noise during thresholding of the image backgrounds (especially in the green channel). To differentiate between red and green cells the mean green-intensity of the cell area was thresholded at an intensity value of 50. This value was estimated by empiric testing. After all pictures were analyzed, the percentage of red and green cells, as well as the concentration per ml was calculated. These experiments were performed three times for every sample.
OD750 measurement and absorption spectroscopy
The optical density of the samples was measured at 750 nm using the UV-Spectrophotometer UV-1800 (Shimadzu). For the analysis of the absorption, the cultures were adjusted to an optical density of 0.65, and spectra were recorded in the range of 300 - 800 nm.
The chlorophyll measurement was performed two times for every sample.
Viable cells per ml were determined by spreading 5*104 cells of the samples on agar plates (87 mm inner diameter; 60.1 cm2 growth area) containing BG-11 and 1% agar. The plates were incubated for one week at room temperature and 10 μE/m2s. Colonies were counted using the autofluorescence of phycocyanin. Fluorescence pictures of the plates were taken with the Keyence BZ9000 and a phycocyanin fluorescence filter set (excitation: 600/37 nm; beam splitter: 625 nm; emission: 655/40 nm). Using the automated scanning module of the Keyence Software, pictures of an area of 10.5 cm2 were taken. Automated counting was done by another self written ImageJ plugin which uses histogram thresholding for segmentation and the integrated "Analyze Particles" function. To calculate the viability of the cultures the colony count of all samples was normalized by the colony count of the control (only viable cells plated). The plating was performed in triplicates for every sample.
We thank B. Hense and K. Rodenacker (Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen) for their initial support in choosing proper fluorescence filters, D. Kramer (Cyano Biofuels GmbH, Berlin) for providing Synechocystis cultures and critiquing the manuscript and T. Dandekar (University of Wuerzburg, Dept. Bioinformatics) for fruitful discussions.
The work was funded by the Federal Ministriy for Education and Research (BMBF) of Germany in the program "IngenieurNachwuchs"/"Forschung an Fachhochschulen". This publication was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the University of Wuerzburg in the funding programme Open Access Publishing.
- Tandeau de Marsac N: Occurrence and nature of chromatic adaptation in cyanobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1977, 130: 82-91.Google Scholar
- Sato M, Murata Y, Mizusawa M: A Simple and Rapid Dual-fuorescence Viability Assay for Microalgea. Microbiol Cult Coll. 2004, 20 (2): 53-59.Google Scholar
- Lee TJ, Nakano K, Matsumura M: A new method for the rapid evaluation of gas vacuoles regeneration and viability of cyanobacteria by flow cytometry. Biotechnology Letters. 2000, 22: 1833-1838. 10.1023/A:1005653124437.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beck E, Scheibe R: Senescence and ageing in plants and cyanobacteria. Physiologia Plantarum. 2003, 119: 1-4. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00140.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hörtensteiner S: Chlorophyll degradation during senescence. Annual review of plant biology. 2006, 57: 55-77. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hense B, Gais P, Jutting U, Scherb H, Rodenacker K: Use of fluorescence information for automated phytoplankton investigation by image analysis. Journal of Plankton Research. 2008, 30 (5): 587-606. 10.1093/plankt/fbn024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang YZ, Dobbs FC: Green autofluorescence in dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other microalgae and its implications for vital staining and morphological study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 2306-2313. 10.1128/AEM.01741-06.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abramoff M, Magalhaes P, Ram S: Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004, 11 (7): 36-42.Google Scholar
- Rasband W: ImageJ. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 1997-2011. [http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/]
- Kaneko T, Sato S, Kotani H, Tanaka A, Asamizu E, Nakamura Y, Miyajima N, Hirosawa M, Sugiura M, Sasamoto S, Kimura T, Hosouchi T, Matsuno A, Muraki A, Nakazaki N, Naruo K, Okumura S, Shimpo S, Takeuchi C, Wada T, Watanabe A, Yamada M, Yasuda M, Tabata S: Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. II. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions. DNA research. 1996, 3 (3): 185-209. 10.1093/dnares/3.3.185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapur JN, Sahoo PK, Wong ACK: A New Method for Gray-Level Picture Thresholding Using the Entropy of the Histogram. Graphical Models and Image Processing. 1985, 29 (3): 273-285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Igathinathane C, Pordesimo LO, Columbus EP, Batchelor WD, Methuku SR: Shape identification and particles size distribution from basic shape parameters using ImageJ. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2008, 63 (2): 168-182. 10.1016/j.compag.2008.02.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.