Skip to main content

Table 2 The effects of the ‘line’, ‘transgene’ and ‘ontogeny’ factors on the fruit quality in the sweet orange lines

From: Field performance of transgenic citrus trees: Assessment of the long-term expression of uidA and nptIItransgenes and its impact on relevant agronomic and phenotypic characteristics

Source

Fruit quality parameter (dependent variable)

 

Weight

Volume

Caliber

Color Index

Juice content1

TA

TSS

MI

 

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

S1

S2

S3

Factor / ANOVA 2

                        

Line

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

*

NS

NS

*

NS

*

NS

NS

***

***

***

NS

NS

NS

*

*

***

Plant (Line)

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

*

*

NS

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

NS

Contrasts to test ‘transgene’ effect 3

                        

P3A vs PCA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

*

P4A vs PCA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

**

P5A vs PCA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

P6A vs PCA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

P7A vs PCA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

P8A vs PCA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Contrasts to test ‘ontogeny’ effect 4

                        

J vs A

NS

*

NS

NS

**

NS

NS

**

NS

NS

**

NS

NS

NS

NS

***

***

***

NS

NS

NS

**

**

***

PCJ vs PCA

NS

*

NS

NS

*

NS

NS

*

NS

NS

**

NS

NS

NS

NS

***

*

***

NS

NS

NS

**

NS

***

TJ vs TA

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

*

NS

NS

*

NS

NS

NS

NS

*

***

***

NS

NS

NS

NS

**

***

  1. 1The “juice content” variable was log-transformed prior to the analyses to fit the data to a normal distribution.
  2. 2ANOVA to test the effects of Line on each fruit quality variable. Independent statistical analyses were performed for each fruit quality parameter and season.
  3. 3Contrasts to test for significant differences between each adult transgenic line and their respective control line (PCA) using Dunnett’s test.
  4. 4Planned comparisons to test for significant differences between juvenile and adult lines. J, average of all juvenile lines; A, average of all adult lines; TJ, average of all juvenile and transgenic lines; TA, average of all adult and transgenic lines.
  5. TA, titratable acidity; TSS, total soluble solids; MI, maturity index (TSS/TA); S1, season 2004; S2, season 2005; S3, season 2006.
  6. *p < 0.01; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001; NS, not significant.