Overexpression of an isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene to enhance trans-polyisoprene production in Eucommia ulmoides Oliver
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 July 2011
Accepted: 22 October 2012
Published: 30 October 2012
Natural rubber produced by plants, known as polyisoprene, is the most widely used isoprenoid polymer. Plant polyisoprenes can be classified into two types; cis-polyisoprene and trans-polyisoprene, depending on the type of polymerization of the isoprene unit. More than 2000 species of higher plants produce latex consisting of cis-polyisoprene. Hevea brasiliensis (rubber tree) produces cis-polyisoprene, and is the key source of commercial rubber. In contrast, relatively few plant species produce trans-polyisoprene. Currently, trans-polyisoprene is mainly produced synthetically, and no plant species is used for its commercial production.
To develop a plant-based system suitable for large-scale production of trans-polyisoprene, we selected a trans-polyisoprene-producing plant, Eucommia ulmoides Oliver, as the target for genetic transformation. A full-length cDNA (designated as EuIPI, Accession No. AB041629) encoding isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IPI) was isolated from E. ulmoides. EuIPI consisted of 1028 bp with a 675-bp open reading frame encoding a protein with 224 amino acid residues. EuIPI shared high identity with other plant IPIs, and the recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli showed IPI enzymatic activity in vitro. EuIPI was introduced into E. ulmoides via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transgenic lines of E. ulmoides overexpressing EuIPI showed increased EuIPI expression (up to 19-fold that of the wild-type) and a 3- to 4-fold increase in the total content of trans-polyisoprenes, compared with the wild-type (non-transgenic root line) control.
Increasing the expression level of EuIPI by overexpression increased accumulation of trans-polyisoprenes in transgenic E. ulmoides. IPI catalyzes the conversion of isopentenyl diphosphate to its highly electrophilic isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate, which is the first step in the biosynthesis of all isoprenoids, including polyisoprene. Our results demonstrated that regulation of IPI expression is a key target for efficient production of trans-polyisoprene in E. ulmoides.
KeywordsIsopentenyl diphosphate isomerase Trans-polyisoprene Natural rubber Genetic transformation Eucommia ulmoides
To develop a suitable plant-based system for the large-scale production of trans-polyisoprene, we selected a trans-polyisoprene-producing plant, E. ulmoides Oliver, as the target for genetic transformation. E. ulmoides is a deciduous, dioecious woody plant that produces a trans-polyisoprene known as Eu-rubber in the leaves, root, bark, and pericarp [7, 8]. In this study, we isolated and overexpressed an isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IPI) gene in E. ulmoides to enhance its trans-polyisoprene production. IPI catalyzes the interconversion of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) to its highly electrophilic isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), which is an essential starter moiety for the first step in biosynthesis of all isoprenoids including polyisoprene (Figure 1). Previous studies reported that overexpression of the IPI gene caused accumulation of many related downstream isoprenoid metabolites, such as carotenoids and terpenoid indole alkaloids [11, 12]. All these reports suggested that IPI may be a target enzyme for regulating polyisoprene biosynthesis.
Cloning and characterization of EuIPIcDNA
Analysis of EuIPI enzymatic activity
Analysis of EuIPI enzymatic activity
Background (no enzyme)
EuIPI (5 μg)
[4-14C] IPP Incorporation (DPM)
65.92 ± 2.86
417.19 ± 4.86
Overexpression of EuIPI in E. ulmoidesroot lines
The cDNA of EuIPI was inserted into the pMSIsGFP vector, which was introduced into E. ulmoides roots via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Several kanamycin-resistant root lines with sGFP(S65T) (synthetic green-fluorescent protein with S65T mutation) fluorescence were obtained after selection and regeneration. PCR analysis confirmed that 25 root lines produced the predicted DNA fragment, indicating that the transgenes were present in these transgenic root lines. Some transgenic root lines showed defective phenotypes. Eight PCR-positive (PCR+) root lines showing strong growth were selected as representative EuIPI-overexpressing transgenic root lines for further analyses.
Trans-polyisoprene analysis of transgenic E. ulmoidesroot lines
We aimed to up-regulate IPI expression to enhance trans-polyisoprene production in E. ulmoides. In the plant isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway (Figure 1), the basic five-carbon unit IPP is synthesized in the cytoplasm via the mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway [19, 20] or in plastids via the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) pathway [9, 19–22]. IPP is interconverted to its highly electrophilic isomer, DMAPP, by the enzyme IPI at the first step. Then, IPP is sequentially condensed to DMAPP to yield the short-chain isoprenoid precursors geranyl diphosphate (GPP), farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP). These precursors are further metabolized for the biosynthesis of distinct sets of isoprenoids, such as monoterpenes (C10), sesquiterpenes (C15), diterpenes (C20), and polyisoprenes (C>5000) by various isoprenyl diphosphate synthases [20, 23, 24]. Therefore, IPP and DMAPP are starting materials at important regulatory branching points in the biosynthetic pathway of a variety of isoprenoids. IPI is thought to catalyze a regulatory step in isoprenoid biosynthesis . It functions in supplying both the electrophilic primer substrate and the condensation substrate for isoprenoid biosynthesis, and provides the precursor for biosyntheses of various meroterpenoids [11, 13, 25].
According to previous studies, IPIs can be classified into two types: type I and type II. Type I IPIs have been identified in various eukaryotic organisms including humans  and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and in some bacteria including E. coli and Rhodobacter capsulatus. The type II enzymes have been identified in archaea and some bacteria. These type II enzymes are FMN and NAD(P)H dependent . To date, no type II IPI has been identified in the plant kingdom. Type I IPIs have a conserved C residue in a TNTCCSHPL motif and a conserved E residue in a WGEHEXDY motif . Type II IPIs have a conserved motif that includes three G (glycine)-rich sequences, MTGG, GXGGT, and (A/G)SGG . These highly conserved residues are critical for the catalytic activity of the enzyme [15, 28–30]. Our phylogenetic analysis revealed that EuIPI shared a common evolutionary origin with other plant IPIs. EuIPI also contained the highly conserved C and E residues in the two motifs (Figure 2), suggesting that it belongs to the type I IPI family. The C and E residues are thought to face each other in the active site. The reaction is initiated by protonation of the double bond, a process that involves the E residue. The thiol moiety of C, presumably in the thiolate form, assists in removing the proton from the tertiary cation . Most plants have two type I IPI isozymes with distinct subcellular localizations. In tobacco, IPIs are localized in the cytosol and plastids , while in castor bean, IPIs are present in mitochondria and proplastids. Arabidopsis also has two IPI genes that may function in the plastids [20, 32, 33]. Multiple alignment analysis showed that EuIPI shared high homology with C. acuminata IPI2 (Figure 2), a plastid IPI that resembles other plant IPIs . At present, the subcellular localization of EuIPI is still unknown, and so further research is required to clarify its exact location within the cell.
Our results indicated that increasing the expression level of EuIPI increased synthesis of trans-polyisoprene in transgenic E. ulmoides. Overexpression of the IPI gene in E. ulmoides enhanced trans-polyisoprene production by 3- to 4-fold compared with that in the wild-type. Although the exact contribution of IPI to biosynthesis of trans-polyisoprene in transgenic E. ulmoides is unknown, our results demonstrated that regulation of IPI expression may be a key target for efficient production of trans-polyisoprene in E. ulmoides. A previous report on the prokaryote E. coli implied that maize IPI activity was critical for controlling the flux into the carotenoid pathway , and thus, represented an important step in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Similarly, in the green unicellular alga Haematococcus pluvialis, expressions of IPI and two enzymes specific to the carotenoid pathway (lycopene β-cyclase and β-carotene-C-4-oxygenase) resulted in a 3-to 6-fold increase in carotenoid accumulation after exposure to strong illumination . On the other hand, silencing of the tobacco IPI led to a depletion of photosynthetic pigments, suggesting that reduced IPI activity affected isoprenoid biosynthesis in the plastids of tobacco leaves . A site-directed specific inhibitor of IPI, 3,4-oxido-3-methyl-1-butyl diphosphate (OMBPP), inhibited incorporation of IPP into polyisoprene in an in vitro rubber assay . Together, these findings imply that IPI catalyzes a key step in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Consequently, IPI is an attractive target for metabolic engineering for efficient production of industrially useful isoprenoids, including polyisoprene.
The transgenic root line pOEB5-6 showed the highest expression level of EuIPI, but did not show the highest accumulation of trans-polyisoprene. This may be because EuIPI is a rate-limiting enzyme [11, 12, 14, 25, 36] whose catalysis is down-regulated by feedback inhibition . To increase accumulation of trans-polyisoprene via biochemical pathways, it may be necessary to manipulate regulatory genes such as kinases or transcription factors to up-regulate entire pathways .
Since a multi-branched metabolic pathway is responsible for the synthesis of distinct isoprenoids, overexpression of only the first-step enzyme, IPI, cannot enhance polyisoprene production to an extremely high level. Recently, we isolated a gene encoding trans-isoprenyl diphosphate synthase (EuTIDS, Accession No. AB041626) and its co-factors, which have roles in prenyl chain elongation and the formation of rubber particle proteins in E. ulmoides (data not shown). We anticipate that overexpression of these genes in addition to EuIPI will maximize the production of trans-polyisoprene in E. ulmoides.
E. ulmoides is a tertiary species that survives only in China , but it can be cultivated from tropical to temperate zones, and even in cold regions, whereas other species producing trans-polyisoprene (M. balata and P. gutta) grow only in the tropics. Hence, E. ulmoides shows greater promise as an industrial raw material for commercial use. The results of our study will be helpful to develop E. ulmoides for large-scale production of trans-polyisoprene by genetic engineering.
To develop a plant-based system suitable for large-scale production of trans-polyisoprene, we selected a trans-polyisoprene-producing plant, Eucommia ulmoides Oliver, as the target for genetic transformation. A full-length cDNA (designated as EuIPI, Accession No. AB041629) encoding isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IPI) was isolated from E. ulmoides. EuIPI consists of 1028 bp with a 675-bp open reading frame encoding a protein with 224 amino acid residues. EuIPI shared high identity with other plant IPIs, and the recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli showed IPI enzymatic activity in vitro. EuIPI was introduced into E. ulmoides via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transgenic lines of E. ulmoides overexpressing EuIPI showed increased EuIPI expression (up to 19-fold that of the wild-type) and a 3- to 4-fold increase in the total content of trans-polyisoprenes, compared with the wild-type (non-transgenic root line) control. IPI catalyzes the conversion of isopentenyl diphosphate to its highly electrophilic isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate, which is the first step in the biosynthesis of all isoprenoids, including polyisoprene. Our results demonstrated that regulation of IPI expression is a key target for efficient production of trans-polyisoprene.
cDNA library construction
Total RNA was extracted from leaves of a mature E. ulmoides tree using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method . The mRNA was purified from total RNA using Oligotex-dT30 Super (Takara Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) and was used to construct a cDNA library using a lambda ZAP II XR Library Construction kit (Stratagene Japan, Tokyo, Japan).
Cloning of full-length EuIPIcDNA
The total RNA was reverse-transcribed to synthesize first-strand cDNA using an AMV Reverse Transcriptase XL kit and Oligo dT adaptor primers (Takara Bio). To amplify the EuIPI cDNA fragment, one pair of degenerate primers (forward: 5′- TTI GTI TGG ACI AAY ACN TGY TG-3′ and reverse: 5′-AAA IAG IAG RTA RTC IAN YTC ATG YTC-3′, where N is A, C, G or T; Y is C or T; R is A or G, and I is inosine) was designed according to a region that is highly conserved among known plant IPIs (Figure 3). The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min at 94°C for preheating, 30 cycles of 1 min at 94°C for denaturation, 1 min at 54°C for annealing, 2 min at 74°C for synthesis, and 7 min at 74°C for final extension. The PCR product was labeled using the AlkPhos Direct Labeling and Detection System with CDP-STAR (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) and used as a probe to screen the cDNA library. Phage plaques were lifted onto a Hybond N+ membrane (GE Healthcare Japan) and hybridized with the labeled probe under the conditions specified by the manufacturer. The positive lambda ZAP II clones were excised in vivo with helper phage to generate subclones in the pBluescript SK(−) phagemid vector (using a lambda ZAP II XR Library Construction kit; Stratagene Japan) and transformed into E. coli SOLR cells (Stratagene Japan) for sequencing. One clone carrying a full-length cDNA insert was chosen and designated as EuIPI.
The deduced amino acid sequence of EuIPI was aligned against those of other IPIs from different organisms, including plants, bacteria, fungi, and animals, by the Clustal W method with default parameters (Slow-Accurate) using Lasergene® MegAlign (DNASTAR, Madison, USA). A phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the neighbor-joining method  using Treeview (Glasgow, Scotland, UK).
Analysis of EuIPI enzymatic activity
The EuIPI cDNA, spanning from the start codon (ATG) to the stop codon (TAG) (Figure 2), was amplified by PCR with the following primers: forward: 5′-TAT CTC GAG ATG GGT GAT ACC GCC GTC-3′ (XhoI site underlined) and reverse: 5′-TAT GCG GCC GCT AAG CAG ACT GAT TTT C-3′ (NotI site underlined). The PCR product was inserted into a XhoI- and NotI-digested pGEX-6P-1 vector (GE Healthcare Japan) to yield an expression plasmid with a GST-tagged fusion protein sequence. The plasmid was introduced into E. coli BL21. The recombinant proteins were harvested from the E. coli transformant cells after being induced by addition of 0.2 mM IPTG. The GST fusion protein was purified by affinity chromatography using a GSTrap FF column (GE Healthcare Japan), and the GST-tag was removed by enzymatic cleavage using PreScission Protease (GE Healthcare Japan). The purified protein was used for the EuIPI activity assay and 1H NMR analysis according to the methods described by Kaneda et al.  with some modifications according to the optimum conditions for enzyme activity. For the assay, 10 nmol [4-14C] IPP (37 GBq/mol) (PerkinElmer Japan, Yokohama, Japan) substrate and 5 μg purified protein (0.5 μg/μL) were incubated in a 50-μL reaction mixture containing 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.0), 5 mM MgCl2, 25 mM NaF, and 1 mM dithiothreitol at 30°C for 20 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 200 μL methano1:HCl (4:1, v/v) and 500 μL water. Lactonization of samples was then carried out at 37°C for 10 min. The incubation mixture was saturated with NaCl and the allylic products were extracted twice with 500 μL toluene. The supernatant toluene layer was collected and dried over Na2SO4. The toluene phase (500 μL) was mixed with 3 mL cocktail and the radioactivity of reacted products was measured with a Tri-Carb 2100 liquid scintillation counter (Packard Instrument, Connecticut, USA).
The purified protein (1 mg) was also reacted with unlabelled 5 mM IPP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a 1649-μL reaction mixture containing 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 25 mM NaF, and 1 mM dithiothreitol at 30°C for 16 h. After incubation, the reaction mixture was lyophilized, and the resulting residue was resuspended in 99.9% D2O. The reaction products were then analyzed using a 500 MHz 1H NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies Japan, Tokyo, Japan). As a control, a reaction mixture that did not contain purified protein was also analyzed.
Construction of plant overexpression vector
Overexpression of EuIPI gene in E. ulmoidesroot lines
For gene transformation, we used a proliferated root line from a 4-week-old germfree seedling of E. ulmoides. The root line was kept in suspension culture in a root proliferation liquid medium containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium (half-strength MS salts and vitamins), supplemented with 15 g/L sucrose and 1 μM naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). The A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harboring the pOEB5 vector was grown overnight at 28°C with shaking (150 rpm) in Luria-Bertani liquid medium containing 50 mg/L kanamycin. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended to a final OD550 of 0.25 in suspension solution containing MS basal medium supplemented with 30 g/L sucrose, 3 μM 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), and 3 μM 6-(γ,γ-dimethylallyl-amino)purine (2-iP) combined with 20 mg/L acetosyringone. The proliferated clonal roots of E. ulmoides were cut into 5–8 mm segments, sonicated for 20 min, and immersed in Agrobacterium suspensions for 3 min. Segments were then blotted dry with sterile filter paper to remove excess bacteria, and transferred into Petri dishes containing filter paper laid over co-cultivation medium (same composition as suspension solution, but solidified with 2.4 g/L Gelrite (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). After 3 days of co-cultivation at 22°C in the dark, segments were transferred to callus induction and selection medium (same composition as the co-cultivation medium, but with no acetosyringone, and containing 200 mg/L vancomycin and 25 mg/L kanamycin). They were subcultured twice over a 3-week interval, and then transferred to root induction medium (same composition as root proliferation liquid medium, but solidified with 2.4 g/L Gelrite, and containing 200 mg/L vancomycin and 25 mg/L kanamycin). After the calli regenerated adventitious roots, only one well-grown root from each transgenic callus was harvested and transferred to the root proliferation liquid medium containing 200 mg/L vancomycin and 5 mg/L kanamycin for proliferation. The roots proliferated from a transgenic callus were considered as an independent root line. All cultures were incubated at 25°C under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod with light supplied by a fluorescent cool-white light (50 μmol m-2s-1 photosynthetic photon flux density).
DNA and RNA analyses of transgenic roots
PCR analysis was conducted to screen transgenic roots for the presence of the transgenes. Total genomic DNA was isolated from the regenerated root lines using the DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen K.K., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To distinguish the endogenous EuIPI from the transgene, a pair of primers (forward: 5’-TCA TTT GGA GAG AAC ACG GGG GAC-3’ and reverse: 5’-TGC TCT TGG ACG TTG CAA ACG TAAG-3’) was designed based on the T-DNA sequence of pOEB5 (one from the sequence of the 35S promoter and one from that of the NOS terminator, located either side of the EuIPI cDNA overexpression construct). These primers were used to amplify the 820-bp fragment by PCR using 20 ng total isolated DNA as the template. The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min at 95°C for preheating, 30 cycles of 1 min at 95°C for denaturation, 1 min at 60°C for annealing, 2 min at 74°C for synthesis, and 7 min at 74°C for final extension. Eight PCR+ root lines showing strong growth were selected as the representative EuIPI-overexpressing transgenic root lines for further analyses.
Total RNA was isolated from the eight representative transgenic root lines using an RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen K. K, Tokyo, Japan). The expression level of EuIPI in these lines was determined by real-time RT-PCR as described previously . The primers used for RT-PCR analysis of the EuIPI gene were as follows: 5′-AAC GAT CAG GGA CAA AGG TAA CA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGA TGG CTG CAG CAT GTG-3′ (reverse). Gene expression was calibrated against that of an endogenous gene, elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1α), which was amplified using the primers 5′-CCG AGC GTG AAC GTG GTA T-3′ (forward) and 5′-TAG TAC TTG GTG GTT TCG AAT TTC C-3′ (reverse).
Analysis of trans-polyisoprenes in transgenic roots
The total content of trans-polyisoprenes in each transgenic root line and the distribution of their molecular weights (about 102–108 M) were determined using PyGC/MS and SEC, according to our previous reports . The Soxhlet extraction method was used before PyGC/MS and SEC analyses. Briefly, the sample was lyophilized and ground into a fine powder (150 mg) and then successively extracted by the Soxhlet method with ethanol (100 mL) at 120°C for 10 h and toluene (50 mL) at 150°C for 12 h. The residue obtained from toluene extraction was rinsed with methanol. The residue was dried with a centrifugal concentrator and then dissolved in toluene. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected as trans-polyisoprene fractions for PyGC/MS and SEC analyses. For PyGC/MS analysis, polybutadiene rubber (BR, 1 mg) was added as an internal standard. To quantify trans-polyisoprene, the ratio of the area of trans-polyisoprene to that of BR was compared using NIST MS Search 2.0 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara CA, USA). For SEC analysis, a calibration curve was generated using 1,4-polyisoprene standards with SIC-480II GPC software (System Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The molecular weight distribution was bimodal, and the relative areas of low- and high-molecular weight compounds were calculated.
This work was supported by funds from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan. We thank Prof. Atsuhiko Shinmyo (Nara Institute of Science and Technology) and Dr. Daisuke Shibata (Kazusa DNA Research Institute) for critical reading of the manuscript.
- Asawatreratanakul K, Zhang YW, Wititsuwannakul D, Wititsuwannakul R, Takahashi S, Rattanapittayaporn A, Koyama T: Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of cDNA encoding cis-prenyltransferases from Hevea brasiliensis. Eur J Biochem. 2003, 270: 4671-4680. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03863.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakazawa Y, Bamba T, Takeda T, Uefuji H, Harada Y, Li XH, Chen R, Inoue S, Tutumi M, Shimizu T, Su YQ, Gyokusen K, Fukusaki E, Kobayashi A: Production of Eucommia-rubber from Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. (hardy rubber tree). Plant Biot. 2009, 26: 71-79. 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.26.71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Backhaus RA: Rubber formation in plants. Israel J Bot. 1985, 34: 283-293.Google Scholar
- Archer BL, Audley BG: Rubber gutta percha and chicle. Phytochem. 1973, 2: 310-343.Google Scholar
- Schlesinger W, Leeper HM: Chicle - cis- and trans-polyisoprenes from a single plant species. Ind Eng Chem. 1951, 43: 398-403. 10.1021/ie50494a034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hendricks SB, Wildman SG, Jones EJ: Differentiation of rubber and gutta hydrocarbons in plant materials. Rubber Chem Technol. 1946, 19: 501-509. 10.5254/1.3546846.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tangpakdee J, Tanaka Y, Shiba K, Kawahara S, Sakurai K, Suzuki Y: Structure and biosynthesis of trans-polyisoprene from Eucommia ulmoides. Phytochem. 1997, 45: 75-80. 10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00806-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bamba T, Fukusaki E, Nakazawa Y, Kobayashi A: In-situ chemical analyses of trans-polyisoprene by histochemical staining and fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy in a rubber-producing plant, Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. Planta. 2002, 215: 934-939. 10.1007/s00425-002-0832-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang JH, Kai GY, Cao XY, Chen FM, He DN, Liu Q: Molecular cloning of a HMG-CoA reductase gene from Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. Biosci Rep. 2006, 26: 171-181. 10.1007/s10540-006-9010-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen R, Namimatsu S, Nakadozono Y, Bamba T, Nakazawa Y, Gyokusen K: Efficient regeneration of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver plant from hypocotyl explant. Biol Plant. 2008, 52: 713-717. 10.1007/s10535-008-0137-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kajiwara S, Fraser PD, Kondo K, Misawa N: Expression of an exogenous isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene enhances isoprenoid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1997, 324: 421-426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun ZR, Cunningham FX, Gantt E: Differential expression of two isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerases and enhanced carotenoid accumulation in a unicellular chlorophyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 11482-11488. 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11482.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang YC, Qiu CX, Zhang F, Guo BH, Miao ZQ, Sun XF, Tang KX: Molecular cloning, expression profiling and functional analyses of a cDNA encoding isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase from Gossypium barbadense. Biosci Rep. 2009, 29: 111-119. 10.1042/BSR20070052.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oh SK, Kang H, Shin DH, Yang J, Han KH: Molecular cloning and characterization of a functional cDNA clone encoding isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase from Hevea brasiliensis. J Plant Physiol. 2000, 157: 549-557. 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80111-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Street IP, Coffman HR, Baker JA, Poulter CD: Identification of Cys 139 and Glu207 as catalytically important groups in the active site of isopentenyl diphosphate: dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase. Biochem. 1994, 33: 4212-4217. 10.1021/bi00180a014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hahn FM, Hurlburt AP, Poulter CD: Escherichia coli open reading frame 696 is idi, a nonessential gene encoding isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 4499-4504.Google Scholar
- Kaneda K, Kuzuyama T, Takagi M, Hayakawa Y, Seto H: An unusual isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase found in the mevalonate pathway gene cluster from Streptomyces sp. strain CL190. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 932-937. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.932.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takeno S, Bamba T, Nakazawa Y, Fukusaki E, Okazawa A, Kobayashi A: Quantification of trans-1,4-polyisoprene in Eucommia ulmoides by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Biosci Bioeng. 2008, 105: 355-359. 10.1263/jbb.105.355.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mayer MP, Hahn FM, Stillman DJ, Poulter CD: Disruption and mapping of IDI1, the gene for isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1992, 8: 743-748. 10.1002/yea.320080907.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okada K, Kasahara H, Yamaguchi S, Kawaide H, Kamiya Y, Nojiri H, Yamane H: Genetic evidence for the role of isopentenyl diphosphate isomerases in the mevalonate pathway and plant development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49: 604-616. 10.1093/pcp/pcn032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lichtenthaler HK: The 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999, 50: 47-65. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rohmer M: The discovery of a mevalonate-independent pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria, algae and higher plants. Nat Prod Rep. 1999, 16: 565-574. 10.1039/a709175c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogura K, Koyama T: Enzymatic aspects of isoprenoid chain elongation. Chem Rev. 1998, 98: 1263-1276. 10.1021/cr9600464.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang K, Ohnuma S: Chain-length determination mechanism of isoprenyl diphosphate synthases and implications for molecular evolution. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999, 24: 445-451. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01464-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramos-Valdivia AC, van der Heijden R, Verpoorte R: Isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase: a core enzyme in isoprenoid biosynthesis. A review of its biochemistry and function. Nat Prod Rep. 1997, 14: 591-603. 10.1039/np9971400591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xuan JW, Kowalski J, Chambers AF, Denhardt DT: A human promyelocyte mRNA transiently induced by TPA is homologous to yeast IPP isomerase. Genomics. 1994, 20: 129-131. 10.1006/geno.1994.1139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hahn FM, Baker JA, Poulter CD: Open reading frame 176 in the photosynthesis gene cluster of Rhodobacter capsulatus encodes idi, a gene for isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 619-624.Google Scholar
- Durbecq V, Sainz G, Oudjama Y, Clantin B, Gilles CB, Tricot C, Caillet J, Stalon V, Droogmans L, Villeret V: Crystal structure of isopentenyl diphosphate: dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 1530-1537. 10.1093/emboj/20.7.1530.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wouters J, Oudjama Y, Barkley SJ, Tricot C, Stalon V, Droogmans L, CD: Catalytic mechanism of Escherichia coli isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase involves Cys-67, Glu-116, and Tyr-104 as suggested by crystal structures of complexes with transition state analogues and irreversible inhibitors. J Biol Biochem. 2003, 278: 11903-11908.Google Scholar
- Wouters J, Oudjama Y, Ghosh S, Stalon V, Droogmans L, Oldfield E: Structure and mechanism of action of isopentenylpyrophosphate-dimethylallylpyrophosphate isomerase. J Am Chem Soc. 2003, 125: 3198-3199. 10.1021/ja029171p.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura A, Shimada H, Masuda T, Ohta H, Takamiya K: Two distinct isopentenyl diphosphate isomerases in cytosol and plastid are differentially induced by environmental stresses in tobacco. FEBS Lett. 2001, 506: 61-64. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02870-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campbell M, Hahn FN, Poulter CD, Leustek T: Analysis of the isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1997, 36: 323-328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cunningham FX, Gantt E: Identification of multi-gene families encoding isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase in plants by heterologous complementation in Escherichia coli. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41: 119-123. 10.1093/pcp/41.1.119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pan XC, Chen M, Liu Y, Wang Q, Zeng LJ, Li LQ, Liao ZH: A new isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene from Camptotheca acuminata: Cloning, characterization and functional expression in Escherichia coli. DNA Seq. 2008, 19: 98-105. 10.1080/10425170701446509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Albrecht M, Sandmann G: Light-stimulated carotenoid biosynthesis during transformation of maize etioplasts is regulated by increased activity of isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase. Plant Physiol. 1994, 105: 529-534.Google Scholar
- Page JE, Hause G, Raschke M, Gao W, Schmidt J, Zenk MH, Kutchan TM: Functional analysis of the final steps of the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) pathway to isoprenoids in plants using virus-induced gene silencing. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134: 1401-1413. 10.1104/pp.103.038133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cornish K: The separate roles of plant cis- and trans-prenyl transferases in cis-1,4-polyisoprene biosynthesis. Eur J Biochem. 1993, 218: 267-271. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18374.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Broun P, Somerville C: Progress in plant metabolic engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 8925-8927. 10.1073/pnas.171310598.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JL, Liao XR, Zhang HM, Du JF, Chen PL: Accumulation of chlorogenic acid in cell suspension cultures of Eucommia ulmoides. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 2003, 74: 193-195. 10.1023/A:1023957129569.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamane H, Kashiwa Y, Kakehi E, Yonemori K, Mori H, Hayashi K, Iwamoto K, Tao R, Kataoka I: Differential expression of dehydrin in flower buds of two Japanese apricot cultivars requiring different chilling requirements for bud break. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26: 1559-1563. 10.1093/treephys/26.12.1559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ, Wolfinger RD: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acid Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawasaki T, Henmi K, Ono E, Hatakeyama S, Iwano M, Satoh H, Shimamoto K: The small GTP-binding protein rac is a regulator of cell death in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 10922-10926. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10922.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benfey PN, Chua NH: The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter: combinational regulation of transcription in plants. Science. 1990, 250: 959-966. 10.1126/science.250.4983.959.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niwa Y, Hirano T, Yoshimoto K, Shimizu M, Kobayashi H: Non-invasive quantitative detection and applications of non-toxic, S65T-type green fluorescent protein in living plants. Plant J. 1999, 18: 455-463. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00464.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kajiyama S, Inoue F, Yoshikawa Y, Shoji T, Fukusaki E, Kobayashi A: Novel plant transformation system by gene-coated gold particle introduction into specific cell using ArF excimer laser. Plant Biotechnol. 2007, 24: 315-320. 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.24.315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bevan M: Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984, 12: 8711-8721. 10.1093/nar/12.22.8711.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Nelson RS, Sherwood JL: Enhanced recovery of transformants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens after freeze-thaw transformation and drug selection. Biotechnol. 1994, 16: 664-670.Google Scholar
- Chen R, Gyokusen M, Nakazawa Y, Gyokusen K: Selection of housekeeping genes for transgene expression analysis in Eucommia ulmoides Oliver using real-time RT-PCR. J Bot. 2010, 10.1155/2010/230961.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.