Skip to main content

Table 6 Pairwise comparisons of transformation frequencies in groups of transformation experiments

From: Development of late blight resistant potatoes by cisgene stacking

Group 1    Group 2    Pearson analysis*
  Non transformed Transformed   Non transformed Transformed Chi square P (2-tailed)
Atlantic (MF) 497 12 Bintje (MF) 590 8 1.6 0.2
Atlantic (MF) 497 12 Potae9 (MF) 428 7 0.7 0.7
Potae9 (MF) 428 7 Bintje (MF) 590 8 0.1 0.7
Atlantic (MA) 15 35 Bintje (MA) 45 5 38 0
Atlantic (MA) 15 35 Potae9 (MA) 44 6 35 0
Potae 9 (MA) 44 6 Bintje (MA) 45 5 0.1 0.7
  1. Transformation frequencies in marker-free transformations (MF) are derived from the number of transformed shoots (transformed) and the total number of shoots minus the number of transformed shoots (non-transformed). Transformation frequencies in marker-assisted transformations (MA) are derived from the number of rooting shoots (transformed) and the number of explants used minus the number of rooting shoots (non-transformed).
  2. *null hypothesis: group 1 equals group 2.