Skip to main content
Download PDF

Trigger factor assisted soluble expression of recombinant spike protein of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Escherichia coli

BMC Biotechnology volume 16, Article number: 39 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a highly contagious enteric pathogen of swine. The spike glycoprotein (S) of PEDV is the major immunogenic determinant that plays a pivotal role in the induction of neutralizing antibodies against PEDV, which therefore is an ideal target for the development of subunit vaccine. In an attempt to develop a subunit vaccine for PEDV, we cloned two different fragments of S protein and expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged fusion proteins, namely rGST-COE and rGST-S1D, in E.coli. However, the expression of these recombinant protein antigens using a variety of expression vectors, strains, and induction conditions invariably resulted in inclusion bodies. To achieve the soluble expression of recombinant proteins, several chaperone co-expression systems were tested in this study.

Results

We firstly tested various chaperone co-expression systems and found that co-expression of trigger factor (TF) with recombinant proteins at 15 °C was most useful in soluble production of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D compared to GroEL-ES and DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE/GroEL-ES systems. The soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D were purified using glutathione Sepharose 4B with a yield of 7.5 mg/l and 5 mg/l, respectively. Purified proteins were detected by western blot using mouse anti-GST mAb and pig anti-PEDV immune sera. In an indirect ELISA, purified proteins showed immune reactivity with pig anti-PEDV immune sera. Finally, immunization of mice with 10 μg of purified proteins elicited highly potent serum IgG and serum neutralizing antibody titers.

Conclusions

In this study, soluble production of recombinant spike protein of PEDV, rGST-COE and rGST-S1D, were achieved by using TF chaperone co-expression system. Our results suggest that soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D produced by co-expressing chaperones may have the potential to be used as subunit vaccine antigens.

Background

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) is a highly infectious and contagious enteric disease of swine [1]. The disease is characterized by severe diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration and death, with a high mortality rate of more than 90 % in suckling piglets [2]. In the early 1970s, the first case of PED was reported in England [3]. Since then, the disease has spread to Europe and most of the Asian swine raising countries, and severely affected swine industry in Asia [4, 5]. In 2013, PED suddenly occurred in the United States and rapidly spread across the country [6], as well as neighboring countries [7, 8], and subsequently in Asian countries including South Korea [9], Japan and Taiwan [10], and led to significant economic losses in the global swine industry [11]. Thus, it is important to develop an effective vaccine for the prevention of PED.

A coronavirus named porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was identified as the causative agent of PED in the late 1970s [2]. The virus possesses four structural proteins including 150–220 kDa spike (S) glycoprotein, 7 kDa envelop (E) protein, 20–30 kDa membrane (M) protein and 58 kDa neucleocapsid (N) protein [12]. The S protein is a transmembrane glycoprotein localized on the virion surface, which can be divided into the S1 (aa 1–789) domain and S2 (aa 790–1383) domain [13, 14]. The S protein plays a pivotal role in the cellular receptor binding, viral fusion, and most importantly in the induction of neutralizing antibodies [15, 16]. A neutralizing epitope region, COE (aa 499–638), corresponds to the neutralizing epitope of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), was identified based on the nucleotide sequence homology analysis [17]. Subsequently, a novel neutralizing epitope region S1D (aa 636–789) on the S1 domain was reported to have the capacity to induce neutralizing antibodies against PEDV [13]. In addition, a B-cell epitope 2C10 (aa 1,368–1,374) on the S2 domain was also reported to induce neutralizing antibodies [18]. Therefore, spike protein is considered as a primary target for the development of subunit vaccine against PEDV.

Up to the present, a number of expression systems have been used to produce S protein of PEDV, such as mammalian cells [16], transgenic plant [19], yeast [20] and E.coli [13, 17]. Despite absence of post-translational modifications (such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and glycosylation), expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli has many significant benefits over other expression systems in terms of cost, ease-of-use, and scale [21]. However, recombinant protein overexpression in E.coli often leads to the misfolding of the protein of interest into biologically inactive aggregates known as inclusion bodies (IBs) [22]. Various expression approaches have been suggested to prevent IBs formation, including utilization of solubility enhancing tag, lowering induction temperature, modulating inducer concentration and changing specialized expression hosts [23]. Moreover, many refolding methods have also been explored for the recovery of soluble proteins from purified IBs [24, 25]. However, these approaches are not always effective, since even the most robust protocols only refold a small fraction of the input protein, and it is difficult to purify the refolded fraction [26]. As an alternative strategy, chaperone co-expression strategies have been proposed to facilitate soluble expression of recombinant proteins with success for many different types of proteins [27–29]. Chaperones are complex molecular machinery that assists the folding of newly synthesized proteins to the native state and provide a quality control system that refolds misfolded and aggregated proteins [30, 31]. In the E.coli cytosol, a ribosome-associated folding catalyst known as trigger factor and molecular chaperone teams such as the DanK-DnaJ-GrpE and the GroEL-GroES are profoundly involved in the folding and refolding process [32–35].

In the present study, we report the results of the chaperone-assisted production of soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D in E.coli as well as the evaluation of immunogenicity and efficacy of purified recombinant proteins as a subunit vaccine antigen.

Results and discussion

Chaperone assisted expression of soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D

Based on the sequence information of the spike protein of PEDV CV777 strain, we constructed pG-COE and pG-S1D expression plasmids, producing rGST-COE (containing 138 amino acids spanning the region of 499–636 amino acids) [17] and rGST-S1D (containing 153 amino acids spanning the region of 637–789 amino acids) [13], respectively. However, unlike the previous reports [13, 17], our initial attempts to produce rGST-COE and rGST-COE using a pGEX 6p-1 vector system with various induction conditions resulted in IBs (data not shown). Since, both of the COE and S1D regions contain 4 cysteine residues in the protein sequence, we also performed expression of these clones in E.coli Rosetta-gami™2 (DE3) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) strain known to enhance disulfide bond formation in the cytoplasm, although the yield of soluble proteins was negligible (data not shown).

Previously, chaperone co-expression system has been reported to improve the solubility of various aggregation-prone recombinant proteins, such as human interferon-gamma, mouse endostatin, human ORP150 and human lysozyme [27, 36]. Therefore, we decided to test the effect of chaperone systems, such as trigger factor (TF), GroEL-ES, DnaKJE/GroEL-ES and GroEL-ES/TF, on the production of soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D. The pG-COE and pG-S1D expression plasmids were transformed in to the E.coli BL21, BL21/pTF16, BL21/pGro7, BL21/pG-KJE8 and BL21/pG-Tf2 chaperone competent cells. As shown in Fig. 1, we found that co-expression of TF with recombinant proteins at 15 °C was most useful in soluble production of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D compared to other chaperone combinations (Fig. 1). Majority of the recombinant proteins were presented in insoluble fraction when expressed alone, while co-expression of recombinant proteins with TF resulted in up to 84 % soluble fraction for the rGST-COE, and 41 % for the rGST-S1D compared to 19 ~ 30 % of other chaperone systems. Total amount of recombinant proteins expressed were decreased to 40 ~ 50 % value of no chaperone induction. Interestingly, TF system is a cold shock chaperone, while the GroEL-ES and the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE systems belong to the heat shock chaperones and the ratios of chaperone combinations are critical in the folding or refolding process [30, 37]. In this study as we used commercial system, the ratios of chaperones or other conditions were not optimized for the PEDV antigen expression. Nonetheless, TF system is simple and most effective among the tested conditions for the soluble expression of PEDV antigens and do not require co-chaperones or ATP as compared to the GroEL-ES and the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE systems.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chaperone assisted expression of soluble rGST-COE (a) and rGST-S1D (b). Chaperone proteins were induced at 37 °C by adding L-arabinose (0.5 mg/ml) or tetracycline (10 ng/ml) prior to the expression of recombinant proteins. Target proteins were induced by adding 0.1 mM IPTG at 15 °C for 24 h. Soluble (S) and insoluble (I) fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The protein bands for rGST-COE, rGST-S1D and chaperone proteins are indicated on the right side of the gel. Lanes: control, no chaperone; +TF, co-expression with trigger factor; +Gro, co-expression with GroEL-GroES complex; +G-KJE: co-expression with DnaKJE/GroEL-GroES complex

Full size image

Furthermore, TF, a ribosome associated chaperone, is the first chaperone that interacts with nascent polypeptide chains and assists co-translational protein folding [38]. Thus, TF may be essential for the correct folding of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D during initial de novo folding steps [27, 39]. It was reported that formation of GroEL/TF complex can further enhance binding affinity of GroEL to unfolded protein and facilitate protein folding or denaturation. However, co-expression of GroES-GroEL/TF system (E.coli BL21/pG-Tf2) was not successful in our case due to the growth inhibition observed upon chaperone induction (data not shown).

As shown in Fig. 2, SDS–PAGE revealed the expression of TF (56 kDa) induced by L-arabinose and the expression of rGST-COE (Fig. 2a) and rGST-S1D (Fig. 2b) induced by IPTG. Recombinant proteins or chaperone TF was not produced without IPTG or L-arabinose induction, respectively. Insoluble recombinant proteins were produced with IPTG in the absence of L-arabinose. Soluble recombinant proteins were produced only in the presence of TF. As a result, it was confirmed that co-expression of TF highly improved the solubility of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of trigger factor (TF) on the solubility of rGST-COE (a) and rGST-S1D (b). TF was induced prior to the expression of recombinant proteins by adding L-arabinose (0.5 mg/ml) at 37 °C. Target proteins were induced by adding 0.1 mM IPTG at 15 °C for 24 h. Soluble (S) and insoluble (I) fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The protein bands for rGST-COE, rGST-S1D and TF are indicated. Lanes: −/−, no induction; A/-, induction with L-arabinose; −/I, induction with IPTG; A/I, induction with L-arabinose and IPTG

Full size image

Optimization of expression conditions for soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D production

To maximize the soluble expression of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D, expression conditions for E.coli BL21/pTf16/pG-COE and E.coli BL21/pTf16/pG-S1D were optimized by regulating induction temperature, IPTG concentration, OD at induction and harvest time. The rate of expression and culture temperature can affect the proper folding and IBs formation of most recombinant proteins [40–42]. In order to determine the optimal induction temperature, rGST-COE was induced at different temperatures (15, 21, 28 and 37 °C), while TF was induced with L-arabinose from the culture start. SDS-PAGE results showed that optimal temperature for soluble rGST-COE expression was 15 °C, as the solubility of rGST-COE was increased progressively as temperature decreased from 37 °C to 15 °C. (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Interestingly, the expression level of TF was also increased as the temperature decreased. Indeed, it has been reported that TF, unlike other chaperones in E.coli, is a cold-shock chaperone which was induced at low temperature [37]. Our data suggest that the improved solubility of rGST-COE at low temperature may be attributed to the elevated expression level of TF, but not duo to the reduction of expression rate at low temperature.

After determining the optimal expression temperature, the effect of IPTG concentration (0.1, 0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 mM), OD at induction (at OD600 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 and 1.5) and harvest time (12, 24, 36 and 48 h after induction) were examined on the efficiency of soluble expression. Optimal conditions for soluble expression were 0.1 mM IPTG concentration, induction start at OD600 0.6, and induction time of 24 h or 12 h for rGST-COE and rGST-S1D at 15 °C (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Optimization of IPTG concentration (a), OD at induction (b) and harvest time (c) for soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D expression. The amount of soluble (S) and insoluble (I) fractions were compared relatively with each starting condition (IPTG = 0.1 mM, OD = 0.6, Time = 12 h), respectively, according to the band intensities of SDS-PAGE. The experiment was conducted twice independently, and the data from a representative experiment are shown

Full size image

Purification and western blot confirmation of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D

The soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D fractions were purified by affinity column chromatography using glutathione Sepharose 4B. The soluble fraction obtained after cell lysis and centrifugation was loaded on the column pre-equilibrated with buffer A (140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.8 mM KH2PO4 at pH 7.3). The column was washed successively with buffer A. The bound proteins were eluted using buffer B (50 mM Tris–HCl and 10 mM glutathione at pH 8.0) and fractions containing purified proteins were collected and the purity of the protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Additional file 1: Figure S2). When determined by Bradford assay, the yield of purified soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D in flask culture were 7.5 mg/l and 5 mg/l, respectively. The purity of the pooled fractions was >90 % and we used them without further purification. 1 μg of purified proteins were separated in the SDS-PAGE (Additional file 1: Figure S3), and target proteins were detected using mouse anti-GST monoclonal antibody and pig anti-sera against commercial PEDV live attenuated vaccine in a western blot analysis (Fig. 4). The rGST protein was included as a control for the western blot analysis. No clear bands were detected with pre-immune sera used as a control in western blot (data not shown). Pig anti-PEDV immune sera showed weak signal, high background and some non-specific reactivity in western blot (Fig. 4b) compared to the ELISA result (Fig. 6). It seems that those two results are not matching to some extent. But, it may be possible to get those results, because the pig anti-PEDV sera was raised against live attenuated virus, which contained polyclonal antibodies recognizing both conformational and linear epitopes on the native PEDV spike protein. Therefore, the pig anti-PEDV sera could detect both conformational and linear epitopes on rGST-COE and rGST-S1D in an ELISA assay, while pig anti-PEDV sera could react only with linear epitopes on denatured rGST-COE and rGST-S1D in a western blot. In this context, it is possible that the reaction in ELISA was much stronger than in western blot.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Detection of purified rGST-COE and rGST-S1D proteins by western blot analysis using mouse anti-GST monoclonal antibody (a) and pig anti-PEDV immune sera (b). Lanes: 1, rGST-COE; 2, rGST-S1D; 3, rGST (Control)

Full size image

Neutralization antibody response of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D

To determine the immunogenicity of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D, mice were immunized subcutaneously with 10 μg of purified proteins for 3 times at 2-weeks intervals. Mouse anti-sera were collected before and at 14, 28, 42 days after immunization. The 96 well plates were coated with purified rGST-COE or rGST-S1D and reacted with corresponding mouse anti-sera diluted at 1:200 ~ 1:25600 for the detection of antigen specific serum IgG levels. Both rGST-COE and rGST-S1D strongly elicited antigen specific serum IgG production after third injection of antigens (Fig. 5). In the indirect ELISA, rGST-COE and rGST-S1D also showed significant reactions with pig anti-PEDV immune sera (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Detection of antigen specific serum IgG levels from mice immunized with rGST-COE (a) and rGST-S1D (b) by ELISA. Mice (n = 5) were immunized subcutaneously with 10 μg of purified proteins three times at 2-weeks intervals. Pre-immune sera and sera from two weeks following each injection were serially diluted and assayed by ELISA. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of the means

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Reactivity of purified rGST-COE and rGST-S1D with pig anti-PEDV immune sera in an indirect ELISA. The rGST was included as a negative control. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of the means. The asterisk indicates the p values that are less than 0.05

Full size image

To test whether immunization of mice with rGST-COE and rGST-S1D could elicit specific neutralizing antibodies against PEDV, terminal serum samples collected from immunized mice were subjected to the serum neutralization assay. As shown in Fig. 7, immunization of mice with rGST-COE and rGST-S1D showed significantly higher SN titer than control mice received PBS.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Serum neutralizing (SN) antibody titers from mice immunized with PBS, rGST-COE and rGST-S1D. Terminal serum samples were serially diluted and subjected to the serum neutralization assay. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of the means. The asterisk indicates the p values that were less than 0.05

Full size image

Even though Sun et al. [13] argued only S1D being effective for the induction of neutralizing antibodies, we confirmed through this study the previous report which showed COE and S1D fragments of PEDV spike protein working as neutralizing epitopes [17]. However, unlike the reports of soluble expression of theses antigens [13, 17], the expression of these recombinant antigens using a variety of expression vectors, strains, and induction conditions invariably resulted in inclusion bodies without proper chaperone co-expression such as TF. Even though we exactly matched the reports in terms of vector, amino acid sequence including GST fusion, E.coli strain, and optimization of induction conditions, we could not reproduce the soluble production without the chaperone support.

Conclusions

In this study, two recombinant fragments of PEDV spike protein, COE and S1D, were produced in soluble forms using a chaperone, TF co-expression system in E.coli. Without TF, these antigens invariably resulted in inclusion bodies in variety of expression vectors, host strains, and induction conditions tested. Co-expression of TF with recombinant proteins at 15 °C was most useful in soluble production of rGST-COE and rGST-S1D compared to GroEL-ES and DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE/GroEL-ES systems. The soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D were purified and detected by western blot using mouse anti-GST mAb and pig anti-PEDV immune sera, and showed dominant immune reactivity with pig anti-PEDV immune sera in an indirect ELISA assay. Finally, immunization of mice with 10 μg of purified proteins elicited highly potent serum IgG and serum neutralizing antibody titers. Our results suggest that soluble rGST-COE and rGST-S1D may have potential to be used as efficient subunit vaccine antigens for the PEDV prevention. Further studies will be followed to evaluate the efficacy of those recombinant antigens in target animals for the subunit vaccine development.

Materials and methods

Strains

The expression plasmids, pG-COE and pG-S1D were constructed by ligating pGEX-6p-1 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) with COE (aa 499–636) and S1D (aa 637–789) regions, respectively, in BamH1 and Xho1 sites. The COE and S1D fragments based on the nucleotide sequence of spike protein of PEDV CV777 strain (GenBank Acc. No. AF353511) were synthesized after codon-optimization by Genscript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). These expression plasmids produced recombinant spike proteins, rGST-COE and rGST-S1D, as glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged fusion proteins under the tac promoter (Ptac). Each plasmid was transformed into E.coli BL21, BL21/pTf16, BL21/pGro7, BL21/pG-KJE8 and BL21/pG-Tf2 competent cells (TaKaRa, Japan). E.coli BL21/pTf16 strain produced the trigger factor (TF) under the L-arabinose inducible promoter. On the other hand, E.coli BL21/pGro7 and BL21/pG-KJE8 strains produced GroEL-GroES and DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE/GroEL-GroES chaperone complex, respectively. E.coli BL21/pG-Tf2 strain produced GroEL-GroES/TF complex.

Recombinant protein expression

A seed culture was prepared by inoculating with a single colony of recombinant E.coli strains and grown overnight in 5 ml of LB broth containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin in a 50 ml sterile plastic tubes. For the expression of recombinant proteins, 1 % seed culture was routinely inoculated to 25 ml of LB broth containing 0.5 mg/ml of L-arabinose, 100 μg/ml of ampicillin and 20 μg/ml of chloramphenicol in 100 ml baffled flasks, followed by adding L-arabinose (0.5 mg/ml) and/or tetracycline (10 ng/ml) for the induction of chaperone proteins. Cells were cultured with shaking at 230 rpm and 37 °C. The growth was monitored by measuring the absorbance of optical density (OD) at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer. When the OD600 of the culture reaches set point, cultures were cooled to 4 °C for 30 min and induced by 0.1 mM IPTG at 15 °C for 24 h.

To check the chaperone effect of trigger factor, E.coli BL21/pTf16/pG-COE and E.coli BL21/pTf16/pG-S1D were shake-cultured in LB broth at 37 °C until OD600 reached 0.6, cooled to 4 °C for 30 min and induced at 15 °C for 24 h with or without IPTG (0.1 mM) and with or without L-arabinose (0.5 mg/ml) to detect the protein expression.

Cells were harvested and disrupted on ice by sonication (VCX 750, SONICS, Newtown, CT, USA) using a program (45 cycles of 2 sec On/5 s Off, amp 20 %) and centrifuged at 20,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellets and supernatants were separately stored at −20 °C until use. Protein concentration was measured by Bradford assay (BioRad, CA, USA) using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. Protein expression was evaluated using band intensities of recombinant protein on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) from independent and/or parallel induction samples.

Optimization of soluble recombinant protein expression

To find the optimal conditions for the soluble expression of recombinant proteins, the effect of various induction conditions for E.coli BL21/pTf16/pG-COE and E.coli BL21/pTf16/pG-S1D strains were optimized by regulating induction temperature (15 °C for 24 h, 21 °C for 16 h, 28 °C for 8 h and 37 °C for 4 h with 0.1 mM IPTG when OD600 reaches about 0.6), IPTG concentration (0.1, 0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 mM at 15 °C for 24 h shake culture starting at OD600 of 0.6), OD at induction (OD600 = 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 and 1.5 at 15 °C for 24 h shake culture with 0.1 mM IPTG) and harvest time (12, 24, 36 and 48 h after induction at 15 °C with 0.1 mM IPTG).

Protein purification and analysis

Soluble recombinant proteins were purified from the crude cell extracts by glutathione-affinity chromatography using a glutathione Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare, Sweden). The column was equilibrated with 5 column volume of binding buffer (140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.3) and crude soluble proteins were applied. The column was washed with 5 column volume of binding buffer and bound proteins were eluted with elution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl and 10 mM glutathione, pH 8.0).

Proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on pre-maid 12 % polyacrylamide mini-gels (KomaBiotech, Korea) run in a Mini-PROTEAN electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R250 and images were analyzed by image analysis software of a ChemiDoc™ MP System (BioRad, CA, USA). For the western blot assay, proteins after SDS-PAGE run were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman, USA) in a Mini Trans-Blot system (BioRad, USA). Then the membrane was blocked with Tris-buffered saline/0.1 % Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5 % skim milk (BD/Difco, NJ, USA) for 1 h and probed with mouse anti-GST monoclonal antibody (Genscript, USA) and pig anti-sera against PEDV in TBST at 1:1000 and 1:500 dilutions, respectively, for 1 h both at room temperature. HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (MerckMillipore, Germany) and goat anti-porcine IgG (KPL, USA) diluted at 1:5000 were used as secondary antibody. Detection was carried out using an ECL detection kit (GE Healthcare, Sweden).

Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The reactivity of purified proteins with pig anti-sera against PEDV was tested by an indirect ELISA. The 96 well Immuno-plate (SPL, South Korea) was coated with 5 μg/ml of purified proteins in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 4 °C overnight. Plates were blocked with 1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. Pre-immune and immune sera were obtained from pigs before and after immunization of commercial PEDV vaccine (Green Cross, South Korea). Sera diluted at 1:1000 were added to the corresponding wells and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. HRP conjugated goat anti-porcine IgG (KPL, USA) at 1:2500 dilution was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Plates were incubated with the TMB substrate solution (Sigma, USA) for 15 min in the dark and reaction was stopped by adding sulfuric acid. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured in an Infinite 200 PRO microplate reader (Tekan, Switzerland).

Mouse immunization and detection of antibody production

Six-week-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from Samtako (Osan, Korea). The experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals under the approval of animal ethics committee at Seoul National University (SNU-130415–1). The mice, maintained under standard pathogen-free conditions, were provided with free access to food and water during the experiments. Mice (n = 5) were immunized subcutaneously with 10 μg of purified proteins three times at 2-week intervals. Complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) were mixed with antigens for the priming and boosting of animals. Sera were collected from the mice at 0, 14, 28 and 42 days after first immunization for the antibody detection and serum neutralization assay.

The induction of antigen specific serum IgG level was measured by ELISA. Plates were coated and blocked using the same method described in the indirect ELISA section. After blocking, 2 fold serial diluted mouse sera were added to the wells and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody diluted at 1:5000 was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Other assay procedures are same as described in the indirect ELISA section.

Serum neutralization (SN) assay

The presence of PEDV specific neutralizing antibodies in the serum collected from immunized mice was determined by a serum neutralizing assay. Terminal serum samples were inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min, followed by 2 fold serial dilutions in a serum-free α-MEM containing 1 % antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Invitrogen, USA). PEDV SM98 isolate of 200 TCID50/0.1 ml was mixed with an equal volume of diluted sera. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C, 0.1 ml of each virus-serum mixture was inoculated onto Vero cell monolayers in the 96-well tissue culture plates. After adsorption for 1 h at 37 °C, virus-serum mixture was removed and plates were washed 3 times with PBS. Serum-free α-MEM medium containing trypsin (2.5 μg/ml) was then added into each well and incubated for 3 ~ 6 days at 37 °C. The SN titers were expressed as the highest serum dilution resulting in the inhibition of cytopathic effect.

Statistical analysis

The Student’s t test was used for all statistical analyses, and p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics approval

The animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals under the approval of animal ethics committee at Seoul National University (No.: SNU-130415–1).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

GST:

glutathione S-transferase

IPTG:

isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside

OD:

optical density.

PEDV:

porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

TF:

trigger factor

References

  1. Debouck P, Pensaert M. Experimental infection of pigs with a new porcine enteric coronavirus, CV 777. Am J Vet Res. 1980;41(2):219–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pensaert M, De Bouck P. A new coronavirus-like particle associated with diarrhea in swine. Arch Virol. 1978;58(3):243–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oldman J. Letter to the editor. Pig Farming. 1972;10(Oct suppl):72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi K, Okada K, Ohshima K. An outbreak of swine diarrhea of a new-type associated with coronavirus-like particles in Japan. The japanese journal of veterinary science. 1983;45(6):829–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Li H, Liu Y, Pan Y, Deng F, Song Y, et al. New variants of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, China, 2011. Emerging infectious diseases J. 2012;18(8):1350–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevenson GW, Hoang H, Schwartz KJ, Burrough ER, Sun D, Madson D, et al. Emergence of Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the United States: clinical signs, lesions, and viral genomic sequences. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2013;25(5):649–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ojkic D, Hazlett M, Fairles J, Marom A, Slavic D, Maxie G, et al. The first case of porcine epidemic diarrhea in Canada. Can Vet J. 2015;56(2):149–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vlasova AN, Marthaler D, Wang Q, Culhane MR, Rossow KD, Rovira A, et al. Distinct characteristics and complex evolution of PEDV strains, North America, May 2013-February 2014. Emerging infectious diseases journal. 2014;20(10):1620–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee S, Lee C. Outbreak-related porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strains similar to US strains, South Korea, 2013. Emerging infectious diseases journal. 2014;20(7):1223–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CN, Chung WB, Chang SW, Wen CC, Liu H, Chien CH, et al. US-like strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus outbreaks in Taiwan, 2013–2014. J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76(9):1297–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee C. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: an emerging and re-emerging epizootic swine virus. Virol J. 2015;12(1):193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Egberink HF, Ederveen J, Callebaut P, Horzinek MC. Characterization of the structural proteins of porcine epizootic diarrhea virus, strain CV777. Am J Vet Res. 1988;49(8):1320–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun D, Feng L, Shi H, Chen J, Liu S, Chen H, et al. Spike protein region (aa 636789) of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus is essential for induction of neutralizing antibodies. Acta Virol. 2006;51(3):149–56.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Follis KE, York J, Nunberg JH. Furin cleavage of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein enhances cell-cell fusion but does not affect virion entry. Virology. 2006;350(2):358–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Song D, Park B. Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: a comprehensive review of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccines. Virus Genes. 2012;44(2):167–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oh J, Lee KW, Choi HW, Lee C. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant S1 domain of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus spike protein. Arch Virol. 2014;159(11):2977–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang S-H, Bae J-L, Kang T-J, Kim J, Chung G-H, Lim C-W, et al. Identification of the epitope region capable of inducing neutralizing antibodies against the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Molecules and cells. 2002;14(2):295–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cruz DJM, Kim C-J, Shin H-J. The GPRLQPY motif located at the carboxy-terminal of the spike protein induces antibodies that neutralize porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Virus Res. 2008;132(1):192–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang TJ, Kang KH, Kim JA, Kwon TH, Jang YS, Yang MS. High-level expression of the neutralizing epitope of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus by a tobacco mosaic virus-based vector. Protein Expr Purif. 2004;38(1):129–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SM, Mo AY, Lim JG, Chang HJ, Kim TG, Kim KJ, et al. Surface displayed expression of a neutralizing epitope of spike protein from a Korean strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2007;12(6):690–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi H, Miyazaki M. Refolding techniques for recovering biologically active recombinant proteins from inclusion bodies. Biogeosciences. 2014;4(1):235–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sørensen HP, Mortensen KK. Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Factories. 2005;4(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Swartz JR. Advances in Escherichia coli production of therapeutic proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001;12(2):195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. García-Fruitós E. Insoluble Proteins: Methods and Protocols: Humana press; 2015.

  25. Singh A, Upadhyay V, Upadhyay AK, Singh SM, Panda AK. Protein recovery from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli using mild solubilization process. Microb Cell Factories. 2015;14(1):41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gräslund S, Nordlund P, Weigelt J, Bray J, Gileadi O, Knapp S, et al. Protein production and purification. Nat Methods. 2008;5(2):135–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishihara K, Kanemori M, Yanagi H, Yura T. Overexpression of trigger factor prevents aggregation of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(3):884–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. De Marco A, Deuerling E, Mogk A, Tomoyasu T, Bukau B. Chaperone-based procedure to increase yields of soluble recombinant proteins produced in E. coli. BMC Biotechnol. 2007;7(1):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nausch H, Huckauf J, Koslowski R, Meyer U, Broer I, Mikschofsky H. Recombinant production of human interleukin 6 in Escherichia coli. Plos one. 2013;8(1):e54933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. 2011;475(7356):324–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mashaghi A, Kramer GN, Lamb DC, Mayer MP, Tans SJ. Chaperone action at the single-molecule level. Chem Rev. 2013;114(1):660–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saibil H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(10):630–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mashaghi A, Kramer G, Bechtluft P, Zachmann-Brand B, Driessen AJ, Bukau B, et al. Reshaping of the conformational search of a protein by the chaperone trigger factor. Nature. 2013;500(7460):98–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Singhal K, Vreede J, Mashaghi A, Tans SJ, Bolhuis PG. The trigger factor chaperone encapsulates and stabilizes partial folds of substrate proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(10):e1004444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nunes JM, Mayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU, Müller DJ. Action of the Hsp70 chaperone system observed with single proteins. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan X, Hu S, Guan YX, Yao SJ. Coexpression of chaperonin GroEL/ES markedly enhanced soluble and functional expression of recombinant human interferon-gamma in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93(3):1065–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kandror O, Goldberg AL. Trigger factor is induced upon cold shock and enhances viability of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94(10):4978–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kramer G, Patzelt H, Rauch T, Kurz TA, Vorderwülbecke S, Bukau B, et al. Trigger factor peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase activity is not essential for the folding of cytosolic proteins in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(14):14165–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kandror O, Sherman M, Moerschell R, Goldberg AL. Trigger factor associates with GroEL in vivo and promotes its binding to certain polypeptides. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(3):1730–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kataeva I, Chang J, Xu H, Luan CH, Zhou J, Uversky VN, et al. Improving solubility of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Clostridium thermocellum JW-20 proteins expressed into Esherichia coli. J Proteome Res. 2005;4(6):1942–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shirano Y, Shibata D. Low temperature cultivation of Escherichia coli carrying a rice lipoxygenase L-2 cDNA produces a soluble and active enzyme at a high level. FEBS letter. 1990;271(1–2):128–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Volonte F, Marinelli F, Gastaldo L, Sacchi S, Pilone MS, Pollegioni L, et al. Optimization of glutaryl-7-aminocephalosporanic acid acylase expression in E. coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2008;61(2):131–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Animal Disease Management Technology Development (No. 313014–3), Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea. S. Maharjan is supported by Brain Korea 21 Program for Leading Universities & Students (BK21 PLUS), Republic of Korea. The article processing charge was funded by Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea

    Da-Chuan Piao, Do-Woon Shin, In-Seon Kim, Hui-Shan Li, Seo-Ho Oh, Bijay Singh, S. Maharjan, Chong-Su Cho & Yun-Jaie Choi

  2. Institute of Green-Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang-gun, 25354, Republic of Korea

    Yoon-Seok Lee, Jin-Duck Bok & Sang-Kee Kang

  3. Department of Animal Science, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, 300-384, People’s Republic of China

    Zhong-Shan Hong & Yun-Jaie Choi

Authors
  1. Da-Chuan Piao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Do-Woon Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. In-Seon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hui-Shan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seo-Ho Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bijay Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Maharjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yoon-Seok Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jin-Duck Bok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chong-Su Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhong-Shan Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sang-Kee Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yun-Jaie Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sang-Kee Kang or Yun-Jaie Choi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

DCP designed the research, performed the experiments and prepared the manuscript. DWS helped to do the experiments regarding optimization experiments. ISK, HSL, SHO, BS, SM and YSL helped to interpret data. JDB, ZSH, CSC, SKK and YJC helped to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

SDS-PAGE analysis of rGST-COE expression at various induction temperatures. S, soluble fraction; I, insoluble fraction. The solid arrows indicate rGST-COE. Figure S2. SDS-PAGE analysis of rGST-COE (A) and rGST-S1D (B) purified using glutathione Sepharose 4B. Dotted arrow indicates rGST-COE and rGST-S1D. M, size markers in kDa; Lanes: 1, soluble crude proteins; 2, unbound fractions; 3–4, washing fractions; 5–9, elution fractions. Figure S3. SDS-PAGE analysis of purified rGST-COE, rGST-S1D and rGST. 1 μg of purified rGST-COE, rGST-S1D and rGST were loaded on the SDS-PAGE. Lanes: 1, rGST-COE; 2, rGST-S1D; 3, rGST. (DOCX 456 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piao, DC., Shin, DW., Kim, IS. et al. Trigger factor assisted soluble expression of recombinant spike protein of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Escherichia coli . BMC Biotechnol 16, 39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0268-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0268-7

Keywords

BMC Biotechnology

ISSN: 1472-6750

Contact us