High efficiency electrotransformation of Lactococcus lactis spp. lactiscells pretreated with lithium acetate and dithiothreitol
© Papagianni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 29 September 2006
Accepted: 21 March 2007
Published: 21 March 2007
A goal for the food industry has always been to improve strains of Lactococcus lactis and stabilize beneficial traits. Genetic engineering is used extensively for manipulating this lactic acid bacterium, while electropolation is the most widely used technique for introducing foreign DNA into cells. The efficiency of electrotransformation depends on the level of electropermealization and pretreatment with chemicals which alter cell wall permeability, resulting in improved transformation efficiencies is rather common practice in bacteria as in yeasts and fungi. In the present study, treatment with lithium acetate (LiAc) and dithiothreitol (DTT) in various combinations was applied to L. lactis spp. lactis cells of the early-log phase prior to electroporation with plasmid pTRKH3 (a 7.8 kb shuttle vector, suitable for cloning into L. lactis). Two strains of L. lactis spp. lactis were used, L. lactis spp. lactis LM0230 and ATCC 11454. To the best of our knowledge these agents have never been used before with L. lactis or other bacteria.
Electrotransformation efficiencies of up to 105 transformants per μg DNA have been reported in the literature for L. lactis spp.lactis LM0230. We report here that treatment with LiAc and DDT before electroporation increased transformation efficiency to 225 ± 52.5 × 107 transformants per μg DNA, while with untreated cells or treated with LiAc alone transformation efficiency approximated 1.2 ± 0.5 × 105 transformants per μg DNA. Results of the same trend were obtained with L. lactis ATCC 11454, although transformation efficiency of this strain was significantly lower. No difference was found in the survival rate of pretreated cells after electroporation. Transformation efficiency was found to vary directly with cell density and that of 1010 cells/ml resulted in the highest efficiencies. Following electrotransformation of pretreated cells with LiAc and DDT, pTRKH3 stability was examined. Both host-vector systems proved to be reproducible and highly efficient.
This investigation sought to improve still further transformation efficiencies and to provide a reliable high efficiency transformation system for L. lactis spp. lactis. The applied methodology, tested in two well-known strains, allows the production of large numbers of transformants and the construction of large recombinant libraries.
Lactococcus lactis is the model lactic acid bacterium extensively used in the manufacture of fermented foods of animal origin. A goal for the food industry has always been to improve L. lactis strains and to stabilize important traits of this bacterium. Today, genetic engineering is used extensively for manipulating L. lactis. Important contributions to the evolution of genetic technology of this organism include the development of transformation techniques and the construction of powerful plasmids for gene cloning and for general mutagenesis [1, 2]. In the past years, electroporation has become the widest used method for introducing DNA in L. lactis cells. Transformation by electroporation involves the application of a brief, high voltage electrical pulse to a suspension of cells and DNA. Although the molecular mechanism of electrotransformation is not completely understood, the electrical pulse is though to result in a rearrangement of the components of the cell wall and membrane to generate transient pores through which the DNA can pass into the cell .
Harlander  was the first to employ electroporation in L. lactis. Later, McIntyre and Harlander [5, 6] improved electroporation efficiency of intact L. lactis cells by adjusting a number of parameters like the growth phase and final concentration of cells, the growth medium, the concentration of plasmid DNA and the amplitude and duration of the pulse. Since then, numerous papers describing the transformation of lactic acid bacteria have been published . The efficiency of electrotransformation is strongly correlated to the level of electropermeabilization . As the physical barrier of the cell wall has to be weakened enough in order that an adequate amount of DNA will enter the cell, pretreatment with chemicals that increase cell wall permeability, and subsequently improve the transformation rate, has often been proposed. Pretreatment with lysozyme has been proposed by Powel et al. , threonine, by Van der Lelie et al.  and Dornan and Collins  and glycine, by Holo and Nes  and Le Bourgeois et al. . The effect of cell wall weakening agents, however, is not universal as they were found to be either highly strain-specific  or completely ineffective with some microorganisms .
Chemical treatment prior to electroporation tends to be common practice today with bacteria and fungi and various chemicals are proposed in electrotransformation protocols, while their mechanism of action is not always known. CaCl2 for example, is used successfully with Escherichia coli  and what makes the treatment successful is still unknown. Similarly, thiol compounds and lithium acetate are used successfully with yeasts while the way they act and increase transformation efficiencies remains unknown .
In the present work, the transformation efficiency of L. lactis spp.lactis LM0230 and L. lactis spp.lactis ATCC 11454 cells, treated with various combinations of LiAc and DTT before electroporation was examined. According to literature information, pretreatment with these chemicals has never been applied before with L. lactis or other bacteria. A tremendous improvement of transformation efficiency was observed in cells of both tested strains treated with both LiAc and DDT. The effect of cell density on transformation efficiency of pretreated cells was also studied.
Results and discussion
McIntyre and Harlander [5, 6] studied the influence of the growth phase of cells and cell density on transformation efficiency of L. lactis LM0230. Transformation efficiencies were significantly higher (up to 1 × 103 transformants/μg of DNA for 9.8 kb plasmid pGB301) using late stationary phase cells (OD600 = 1.2) at high cell concentrations (5 × 1010 CFU/ml) when subjected to high voltage electric pulses. However, improved transformation efficiencies of approximately 105 transformants/μg DNA with the same system of host/vector were achieved by Dornan and Collins  by altering the conditions under which the bacteria were grown prior to electroporation, e.g. by incorporating threonine in the medium, while cells of the early-log phase were used. Le Bourgeois et al.  reported transformation efficiencies of 1–2 × 107 transformants/μg of DNA for L. lactis spp.cremoris MG1363 using pIL253 as plasmid DNA, and a medium containing glycine (20% w/v) and 0.5 M sucrose, as osmotic stabilizer.
In the present study, the conditions applied by Dornan and Collins  were mostly adopted and transformation efficiencies were determined for cells without and following pretreatment with various combinations of LiAc and DTT with L. lactis LM0230 and L. lactis ATCC 11454 and plasmid pTRKH3, a 7.8 kb plasmid which is a shuttle vector with a wide host range of Gram-positive bacterial strains including L. lactis . LiAc is used widely in yeast transformation , while pretreatment with thiol compounds has also been applied . Thomson et al.  pretreated Saccharomyces cerevisiae with LiAc and DTT and reported enhanced transformation efficiency. Wu and Lechworth  also used a combination of LiAc and DTT and achieved high efficiency transformation of Pichia pastoris, otherwise known for its lower transformation efficiencies compared to other yeasts. While the mechanism for these effects is unclear, treatment of S. cerevisiae with a combination of LiAc and a reducing agent has been shown to modify cell wall porosity and increase their permeability. To the best of our knowledge, the successfully applied to various yeasts treatments with LiAc and DTT, have never been tested before with bacteria.
DNA transformation efficiency of L. lactis spp. lactis cells with and without pretreatment with LiAc and DTT. Results are the mean (± SD) of 6 replications
L. lactis LM0230
L. lactis ATCC 11454
1.20 ± 0.50 × 105
1.00 ± 0.48 × 104
1.10 ± 0.52 × 105
1.20 ± 0.50 × 104
13.00 ± 8.02 × 106
7.00 ± 5.01 × 105
225.00 ± 52.51 × 107
117.00 ± 42.55 × 106
Effect of cell density on transformation efficiency of L. lactis spp. lactis LM0230. Results are the mean (± SD) of 6 replications
Cells × 109/ml
5.00 ± 0.75 × 107
22.00 ± 13.00 × 107
53.60 ± 27.12 × 107
162.00 ± 75.40 × 107
221.00± 50.00 × 107
Following treatment with LiAc and DDT and electrotransformation, vector stability was examined in transformants of both tested strains containing pTRKH3. Transformants were cultivated for 25 generations in medium without erythromycin and subsequently plated on solidified medium with and without erythromycin. The vector was stably maintained since a loss of ≤ 4% after 25 generations without selection was observed. Structural stability of the plasmid was also examined by cultivation in selective medium for 25 generations, plating on solid medium and analysis of plasmid DNA from a number of colonies. Sequencing revealed no deletions indicating that pTRKH3 was also structurally stably maintained.
Treatment of L. lactis spp. lactis LM0230 and L. lactis spp. lactis ATCC 11454 cells with LiAc and DDT prior to electrotransformation with plasmid pTRKH3, resulted in a tremendous improvement in transformation efficiency without affecting their survival rate. The developed methodology applied to high cell density suspensions (1010 cells/ml) allows the production of large numbers of transformants. The described host-vector systems are reproducible and highly efficient.
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
L. lactis spp.lactis LM0230, a plasmid-free derivative of L. lactis C2 , and L. lactis spp.lactis ATCC 11454, a known nisin producer , were used in this study. L. lactis was grown on GM17 agar (Sharlau, Spain, in which lactose was replaced with 1% w/v glucose) at 30°C under 5% CO2. Escherichia coli K12JM110 harbouring the shuttle vector pTRKH3 (7766 bp; conferring tetracycline and erythromycin resistance) was propagated at 37°C on LB medium (Sharlau, Spain) containing 8 μg/ml tetracycline (Sigma) and 50 μg/ml erythromycin (Sigma).
Plasmid vector pTRKH3
Plasmid DNA preparation
Plasmid DNA was extracted using the alkaline lysis procedure . Extracted DNA was purified by cesium chloride-ethidium bromide density centrifugation . DNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm. Plasmid separation was done by agarose gel electrophoresis (SCIE-PLAS, UK), using Agarose Multi Purpose (MP) gels from Roche Applied Science (Germany) and 50 × TAE buffer (0.04 mol/l Tris-acetate, 0.002 mol/l EDTA, pH 8.0). Agarose gels were dried with a vacuum dryer (SCIE-PLAS Gel drier, GD4534) at 60°C for 40 min. Gels were viewed with tabletop UV emitter and photography of stained gels was carried out with a Vilber Lourmat (France) photodocumentation system (DD-001-FDC). DNA recovery from agarose was done using proprietary kits from Qiagen (Qiagen, CA, USA).
The nucleotide sequence of pTRKH3, linearized by AvaI was determined by the primer walking strategy, starting from both ends. To cover the complete 7.766 bp, 35 primers were designed and each nucleotide was read at least two times in each direction. Sequencing was accomplished by using an Applied Biosystems model 373A automatic sequencer according to procedures provided by the supplier and fluorescent-dye-labeled dideoxyribonucleotides.
Electroporation of Lactococcus lactis
Electroporation was done according to a modification of the method of Van der Lelie , proposed by Dornan and Collins . Overnight cultures of L. lactis of both strains grown at 30°C under 5% CO2 in GM17 broth supplemented with 40 mmol/l threonine (Sigma) were diluted 1:12.5 in 25 ml of GM17. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min when the optical density at 660 nm was between 0.26 and 0.38, according to Dornan and Collins . Cell number was calculated according to McIntyre and Harlander [5, 6]. The cells were washed sequentially with the following ice-cold solutions by alternate centrifugation and resuspension: bidistilled water 2.0 ml, bidistilled water 1 ml, 50 mmol/l EDTA 1 ml, bidistilled water 1 ml, 0.3 mol/l sucrose 1 ml, 0.3 mol/l sucrose 0.3 ml. After the final suspension, the cells were immediately electroporated at a concentration of 1010 cells/ml, using an electroporator with pulse controller (Electro Cell Manipulator™ 600, BTX, USA). Electroporation was performed by a single pulse at 2.5 kV (E = 12.4 kV/cm), 200 Ω, and 25 μF (corresponding to pulse length of 4.6 ms), in 2 mm disposable electroporation cuvettes (CE-0002, Eurogentec, Belgium), using 1 μg of purified plasmid DNA. The cell suspension was diluted immediately by the addition of 5 ml GSM17 (GM17 containing 1% w/v sucrose) broth supplemented with 10 μg/ml erythromycin [5, 6] and incubated for 2 h at 30°C under 5% CO2 before being placed on GSM17 agar supplemented with erythromycin (10 μg/ml). Appropriate controls confirmed the absence of transformants if either the electric pulse or the plasmid DNA was omitted. Transformation was confirmed by selection in erythromycin containing medium and plasmid analysis.
Statistical analysis were done by Student's t-test and regression analysis.
Pretreatment of cells with LiAc and DTT
Pretreatment of L. lactis with lithium acetate and/or dithiothreitol was as follows: 109 cells were suspended at room temperature for 30 min in 8 ml of 100 mM LiAc, 10 mM DTT, 0.6 M sucrose, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Following treatment, the cells were pelleted, resuspended in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube, and washed as described above.
This work was financed within the framework of the Cell Factory Programme of the Commission of the European Communities. Framework Programme 5, RTD, Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources. ANTICO: QLK3-CT-2002-02038.
- Gasson MJ, Fitzerald GF: Gene transfer systems and transposition. Genetics and biotechnology of lactic acid bacteria. Edited by: Gasson MJ, de Vos WM. 1994, London: Blackie Academic & Professional, 1-51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wood BJB, Warner PJ: Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. 2003, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum PublishersView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rixon J, Warner PJ: Background, relevant genetic techniques and terms. Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. Edited by: Wood BJB, Warner PJ. 2003, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1-24.Google Scholar
- Harlander SK: Transformation of Streptococcus lactis by electroporation. Streptococcal genetics. Edited by: Ferretti JJ, Curtiss R. 1987, Washington D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 229-233.Google Scholar
- McIntyre DA, Harlander SK: Genetic transformation of intact Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis by high-voltage lectroporation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989, 55: 604-610.Google Scholar
- McIntyre DA, Harlander SK: Improved electroporation efficiency of intact Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis cells grown in defined media. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989, 55: 2621-2626.Google Scholar
- Sixou S, Eynard N, Escoubas JM, Werner E, Teissie J: Optimized conditions for electrotransformation of bacteria are related to the extend of electropermealization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991, 1088: 135-138.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Powel IB, Achen MG, Hillier AJ, Davidson BE: A simple and rapid method for genetic transformation of lactic streptococci by electroporation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988, 54: 655-660.Google Scholar
- Van der Lelie D, Bron S, Venema G, Oskam L: Similarity of minus origin of replication and flanking region open reading frames of plasmids pUB110, pTb913 and pMV158. Nucleic Acids Research. 1989, 17: 7283-7294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dornan S, Collins MA: High efficiency eletroporation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis LM0230 with plasmid pGB301. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1990, 11: 62-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holo H, Nes IF: High frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown in glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988, 55: 3119-3123.Google Scholar
- Le Bourgeois P, Langella P, Ritzenthaler P: Electrotransformation of Lactococcus lactis. Electrotransformation of bacteria. Edited by: Eynard N, Teissie J. 2000, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 56-65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eynard N, Teissie J: General principles of bacteria electrotransformation: key steps. Electrotransformation of bacteria. Edited by: Eynard N, Teissie J. 2000, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berthier F, Zagorec M, Champomier-Verges M, Ehrich SD, Morel-Deville F: Efficient transformation of Lactobacillus sake by electroporation. Microbiology. 1996, 142: 1273-1279.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown TA: Essential molecular biology. 2000, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Wu S, Letchworth GJ: High efficiency transformation by electroporation of Pichia pastoris pretreated with lithium acetate and dithiothreitol. BioTechniques. 2004, 36: 152-154.Google Scholar
- O'Sullivan DJ, Klaenhammer TR: High- and low-copy-number Lactococcus shuttle cloning vectors with features for clone screening. Gene. 1993, 137: 227-231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cregg JM, Russell KA: Transformation. Pichia protocols. Edited by: Higgins D, Cregg J. 1998, Totawa: Humana Press, 27-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suga M, Hatakeyama T: High efficiency transformation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe pretreated with thiol compounds by electroporation. Yeast. 2001, 18: 1015-1021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomson JE, Register E, Curotto J, Kurtz M, Kelly R: An improved protocol for the preparation of yeast cells for transformation by electroporation. Yeast. 1998, 14: 565-571.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook JE, Russel DW: Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 2001, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.