Open Access

Production and characterization of in planta transiently produced polygalacturanase from Aspergillus nigerand its fusions with hydrophobin or ELP tags

  • Eridan Orlando Pereira1, 2, 4,
  • Igor Kolotilin1,
  • Andrew Jonathan Conley3 and
  • Rima Menassa1, 2Email author
BMC Biotechnology201414:59

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-59

Received: 7 February 2014

Accepted: 18 June 2014

Published: 27 June 2014



Pectinases play an important role in plant cell wall deconstruction and have potential in diverse industries such as food, wine, animal feed, textile, paper, fuel, and others. The demand for such enzymes is increasing exponentially, as are the efforts to improve their production and to implement their use in several industrial processes. The goal of this study was to examine the potential of producing polygalacturonase I from Aspergillus niger in plants and to investigate the effects of subcellular compartmentalization and protein fusions on its accumulation and activity.


Polygalacturonase I from Aspergillus niger (AnPGI) was transiently produced in Nicotiana benthamiana by targeting it to five different cellular compartments: apoplast, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), vacuole, chloroplast and cytosol. Accumulation levels of 2.5%, 3.0%, and 1.9% of total soluble protein (TSP) were observed in the apoplast, ER, and vacuole, respectively, and specific activity was significantly higher in vacuole-targeted AnPGI compared to the same enzyme targeted to the ER or apoplast. No accumulation was found for AnPGI when targeted to the chloroplast or cytosol. Analysis of AnPGI fused with elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) revealed a significant increase in the protein accumulation level, especially when targeted to the vacuole where the protein doubles its accumulation to 3.6% of TSP, while the hydrophobin (HFBI) fusion impaired AnPGI accumulation and both tags impaired activity, albeit to different extents. The recombinant protein showed activity against polygalacturonic acid with optimum conditions at pH 5.0 and temperature from 30 to 50°C, depending on its fusion. In vivo analysis of reducing sugar content revealed a higher release of reducing sugars in plant tissue expressing recombinant AnPGI compared to wild type N. benthamiana leaves.


Our results demonstrate that subcellular compartmentalization of enzymes has an impact on both the target protein accumulation and its activity, especially in the case of proteins that undergo post-translational modifications, and should be taken into consideration when protein production strategies are designed. Using plants to produce heterologous enzymes for the degradation of a key component of the plant cell wall could reduce the cost of biomass pretreatment for the production of cellulosic biofuels.


Polygalacturonase Aspergillus niger Nicotiana benthamiana Elastin-like polypeptide Hydrophobin I Cellulosic biofuels


The rising demand for sustainable energy in the world and the availability of abundant biomass have attracted an increasing interest in bioconversion of plant cell walls into ethanol and other biofuels [1]. There are many challenges to developing the capability for producing ethanol in an effective and economical fashion. After years of research on the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, one of the key impediments in this field is the recalcitrance of the plant cell wall to breakdown. The digestibility of cellulose present in lignocellulosic biomass is hindered by many physicochemical, structural, and compositional factors [2] and current pretreatments rely on thermochemical technologies using high temperatures, toxic acids, peroxides, and ammonia. The goal of pretreatment is to break down the physical structure of the cell wall and make the crystalline structure of cellulose more accessible to cellulases. This pretreatment process may account for up to 30% of the cost of biofuel production [1]. Enzymatic pretreatment represents a more promising and environmentally friendly technology.

The plant cell wall is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin and smaller amounts of several other inorganic materials [3]. A cell wall component that, particularly in dicots, is critical for tissue integrity and accessibility to cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) is the cohesive pectin matrix embedding the cellulose-hemicellulose network that confers rigidity to the cell wall [4]. Pectin is the most complex class of plant cell wall polysaccharides comprised mainly of three pectic polysaccharides named homogalacturonan (HG), rhamnogalacturonan I and rhamnogalacturonan II [5]. Complete pectin degradation requires a battery of pectinases, including pectate lyases, polygalacturonases (PGs) and rhamogalacturonases, pectin methylesterases and pectin acetylesterases. However polygalacturonases, the enzymes responsible for catalyzing hydrolysis of α-1,4-glycosidic linkage in the α-(1,4)-linked D-galactopyranosyluronic acid (Galp A) residues of HG, are considered a key factor in plant tissue maceration, especially during phytopathogen infection [6]. It has been observed that the addition of a pectinase cocktail, which has PG as a component, to cellulase cocktails increases the yields of glucose by 7.5% [7]. However, due to the different degree of acetylation of the Galp A units in the HG region it is essential that the candidate enzyme presents a certain degree of flexibility for efficient hydrolysis. In silico models in agreement with mass spectrometry studies using 3 different PGs demonstrated that PG I from Aspergillus niger (AnPGI) has a higher tolerance towards acetylated pectin [8].

The cost of biomass degrading enzymes is widely considered an important factor in the commercialization of lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol processes and the use of microorganisms in the production of enzymes is the main platform currently available. One of the reasons for high enzyme cost is the need for high volume bioreactors which substantially increase the cost of production. The use of plants represents an alternative for enzyme production [9]. Transient expression of recombinant proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana constitutes an ideal system for screening and analysis of recombinant enzymes due to its low cost and short time of production, where from cloning to expression data can be achieved in only two weeks. The most promising enzymes and constructs are then usually stably transformed into plants, which offer an almost unlimited scale-up potential. Nonetheless, depending on the purpose, large scale protein production using transient expression systems has been reported [10], where 450–750 kg of N. benthamiana biomass can be infiltrated in 8 hours, producing 1–10 g of recombinant protein/kg of fresh weight within 7–14 days [11].

Although the expression of CWDEs in plants has been demonstrated, accumulation levels in nuclear transformed plants were low [12] and due to the complexity of the plant cell wall, other enzymes remain to be explored using this system. Several strategies have been proposed to improve protein production in plants. Among them, protein fusions can address issues of stability and aid in purification [13]. Targeting heterologous proteins to the appropriate subcellular compartment can be critical for obtaining high levels of accumulation, since the structure and stability of the recombinant protein is affected by its route and final destination in the cell. In plant leaves, heterologous proteins have been typically targeted to the apoplast, ER, vacuole, chloroplasts and cytosol [14] by including a combination of targeting and retention signal sequences in the expression construct.

In the case of protein fusions, elastin-like polypeptide (ELP), a pentapeptide repeat polymer (Val-Pro-Gly-Xaa-Gly) that forms an aggregate above its transition temperature and hydrophobin (HFBI), a small and surface-active protein derived from filamentous fungi have proven valuable for improving recombinant protein accumulation in plants. Despite the fact that these peptides were originally designed for purification, they have also been shown to increase recombinant protein accumulation in plants [1517].

Using a series of constructs targeting the polygalacturonase I from Aspergillus niger (AnPGI) to different subcellular compartments, we report here the effects of subcellular targeting on the accumulation and activity of AnPGI in leaves of N. benthamiana. We also analyze the effects of ELP and HBFI on protein accumulation in the ER and vacuole. Lastly we show through self-hydrolysis analysis that leaves producing AnPGI have a higher content of reducing sugars (up to 20 fold more) in comparison with wild type leaves. These results provide an important step towards inexpensive production of cell wall degrading enzymes for the bioconversion of biomass into fermentable sugars.


Analysis of heterologous polygalacturonase I transiently expressed in N. benthamiana

Several factors need to be taken into consideration for achieving high levels of recombinant protein accumulation in plants, including high transcript levels, correct post translational modifications, and protein turnover. To maintain high levels of transcripts, the double enhanced cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S constitutive promoter was used in a series of AnpgI gene expression vectors that were designed to target the recombinant protein to five different subcellular compartments: apoplast, ER, vacuole, chloroplasts and cytosol (Figure 1A). Agrobacterium cultures containing each of these vectors were transiently co-infiltrated in N. benthamiana with an Agrobacterium culture containing a p19-encoding construct. P19 is a suppressor of post-transcriptional gene silencing from Cymbidium ringspot virus [18]. Leaves infiltrated only with p19 were used as the negative control.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the diverse An PGI heterologous expression constructs evaluated in this study: A) constructs used for protein targeting experiments and B) constructs used to analyze the effect of fusion tags on protein expression. p35S, double enhanced 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S gene; tCUP, translation enhancer from the tobacco cryptic upstream promoter; nos, nopaline synthase transcription terminator; Pr1b, tobacco pathogenesis related 1b protein secretory signal peptide; C-myc, detection/purification tag; KDEL, endoplasmic reticulum retrieval tetrapeptide; CTPP, vacuole sorting peptide; RuBisCo T.P., rubisco small subunit transit peptide; HFBI, hydrophobin I; ELP, elastin-like polypeptide. Schematic not drawn to scale.

Overexpression of recombinant proteins tends to result sometimes in chlorosis or even necrosis of the infiltrated leaf sectors [15]. Although pectic enzymes targeted to the apoplast in transgenic plants have been shown to impair plant growth and fitness [19], leaves infiltrated with the AnPGI constructs did not show any chlorotic or necrotic phenotype by harvest time.

Analysis of transiently expressed protein in N. benthamiana was performed by western blot analysis of leaf total soluble protein extracts, using a monoclonal antibody against the c-Myc tag to determine AnPGI accumulation.

Densitometry analysis showed high accumulation of AnPGI at 2.5%, 3.0% and 1.9% of total soluble protein (TSP) in the apoplast, ER and vacuole respectively (Figure 2A). These analyses also demonstrated that the AnPGI recombinant protein does not accumulate to detectable levels when targeted to the chloroplasts or cytosol of N. benthamiana leaves. Accumulation of AnPGI only occurred in the secretory pathway, and the fact that AnPGI has two N-glycosylation sites led us to ask if glycosylation may be related to stability of the protein.
Figure 2

Accumulation and activity of An PGI in different subcellular compartiments. A) Accumulation of AnPGI in different subcellular compartments. B) A N. benthamiana agroinfiltrated leaf disc was incubated in 50 mM sodium acetate at 50°C for 24 h and used to analyze self hydrolysis and release of reducing sugars using the dinitro salicylic acid (DNS) method. C) Purified AnPGI was used to confirm the difference in polygalacturonase activities when targeted to different subcellular compartments using polygalacturonic acid as the substrate. Accumulation results represent the average of AnPGI levels in five different plants, and the release of reducing sugars and protein activity were determined in triplicate. Reducing sugar concentration was normalized using the assay results for wild-type plants. Error bars represent ± standard error.

Recombinant AnPGI glycosylation analysis

To determine the presence of glycans, a deglycosylation experiment on purified proteins was performed by digesting AnPGI with Endoglycosidase H (Endo H) followed by SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis. After deglycosylation with Endo H, the downshift in the band size indicates that N-glycans were incorporated in the protein (Figure 3). Since N-glycosylation does not occur in the cytosol or chloroplast, this data suggests that glycosylation could be essential for the in vivo stability of AnPGI. A similar effect was observed for the expression of Acidothermus cellulolyticus E1 endo-β-1,4-glucanase in tobacco leaves [20]. Although in that case, the protein was observed in the cytosol and chloroplasts but with average levels of 0.004 and 0.0003% of TSP respectively, which was more than 100 fold lower than its accumulation in the secretory pathway.
Figure 3

Deglycosylation analysis of plant-expressed An PGI targeted to different compartments. Purified AnPGI was incubated for 3 h in denaturing conditions in the absence (-) or presence (+) of EndoH, analysed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-C-myc antibody.

Results of western blot analysis showed that plant-produced AnPGI has a molecular mass of about 60 kDa (Figure 3). This molecular mass is substantially larger than the predicted molecular weight of AnPGI constructs of 41.9 kDa (36.4 kDa of AnPGI plus 5.5 kDa of the added tags). This result is in accordance with previous results reported in the literature, where a 55 kDa molecular mass was determined for AnPGI by SDS-PAGE [21]. This difference may reflect the acidic nature of AnPGI protein, which has an estimated pI of 4.0.

The influence of subcellular targeting on AnPGI activity

N. benthamiana leaves producing AnPGI were analyzed for self-hydrolysis by incubating leaf discs at 50°C for 24 h and using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay. As expected, no significant difference in the release of reducing sugars was observed in leaves infiltrated with constructs targeting the chloroplasts or cytosol, compared with the negative control infiltrated with p19 alone. However, reducing sugars were released from tissues accumulating AnPGI in the apoplast, ER and vacuole. Also, a higher amount of reducing sugars was released when AnPGI was targeted to the vacuole, despite the lower amount of accumulated protein compared with the apoplast and ER (Figure 2A and B). This result could mean that post-translational modifications specific to the vacuole might affect the activity of the enzyme, or that the acidic environment in the vacuole is more conducive to proper folding of AnPGI, and led to a more active enzyme. This led us to determine the specific activity of purified AnPGI targeted to the three compartments.

Transiently produced AnPGI was purified by affinity chromatography using the c-Myc tag fused at the C-terminus of the protein, and purified protein was used for a comparative analysis of AnPGI catalytic activity when localized to the apoplast, ER or vacuole. The results showed that indeed the specific activity of AnPGI against polygalacturonic acid is 30% higher when the protein is targeted to the vacuole (Figure 2C) than when it is targeted to the apoplast or ER.

The effect of ELP and HFBI fusions on AnPGI accumulation

Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) are pentapeptide repeat polymers of Val-Pro-Gly-Xaa-Gly, where the guest residue Xaa can be any amino acid except proline [22], that aggregate above a transition temperature, Tt. Due to this property, ELPs have been explored as fusion partners for an inexpensive non-chromatographic method for protein purification [16]. Besides their utility for purification, ELP fusions have been shown to increase accumulation levels of several heterologous proteins by 2- to 100-fold when expressed in plants [16, 17].

Hydrophobins are small fungal proteins with a size of approximately 10 kDa, which contain a large proportion of hydrophobic residues and eight cysteines connected by disulfide bonds [23]. Due to their propensity to self-assemble into an amphipathic protein membrane at hydrophilic-hydrophobic interfaces, and their ability to alter the hydrophobicity of their fusion partners, hydrophobins have been explored for purification purposes [23]. Hydrophobins were also demonstrated to be useful in improving the accumulation of fusion partners [24]. For example, a hydrophobin I (HFBI) gene from Trichoderma reesei was used as a green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion which led to an increase of GFP accumulation in N. benthamiana leaves from 18% to 38% of TSP [15].

To analyze the effects of ELP and HFBI fusions on AnPGI accumulation, fusion constructs (Figure 1B) were transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana with p19. All proteins were produced, and although some degradation was observed with the ELP-ER and HFBI-ER constructs, most of the protein was in full size form (Figure 4A). Plants analyzed 4 days post infiltration showed a higher accumulation of AnPGI fusion with ELP in both the ER and vacuole when compared with unfused AnPGI (Figure 4B). Although the ELP fusion enhanced AnPGI accumulation in both compartments, the effect of the fusion was more significant in the vacuole, where the ELP enhanced the accumulation of AnPGI by almost 2-fold from 1.9 to 3.6% of TSP (Figure 4B). The presence of HFBI on the other hand was deleterious to the accumulation of AnPGI in both compartments, with very low accumulation in the vacuole.
Figure 4

Accumulation and activity of An PGI and its fusions with ELP and HFBI targeted to the ER and vacuole. A) Western blot analysis of AnPGI and its fusions targeted to the ER or the vacuole. Each lane was loaded with 5 μg TSP from three replicates, and detected with anti c-myc antibody. B) The effect of fusion partner on the accumulation of AnPGI. C) A N. benthamiana leaf disc agroinfiltrated with AnPGI and its fusions was incubated in 50 mM of sodium acetate at 50°C for 24 h and used to analyze self hydrolysis and release of reducing sugars using the dinitro salicylic acid (DNS) method. D) The specific activity against polygalacturonic acid was used to analyse the effect of ELP and HFBI fusions on AnPGI activity. Accumulation results represent the average of AnPGI levels in five different plants, and the release of reducing sugars and protein activity were determined in triplicate. Reducing sugar concentration was normalized using the assay results for wild-type plants. Error bars represent ± standard error.

To further characterize the effects of the protein fusions, we assessed in planta self-hydrolysis and enzymatic activity for AnPGI::ELP and AnPGI::HFBI. We found that the presence of protein fusions impaired the activity of AnPGI resulting in a reduction of the amount of reducing sugars released in planta (Figure 4C). The same reduction was confirmed with the purified enzyme against its substrate, polygalacturonic acid (Figure 4D).

Biochemical characterization of recombinant AnPGI and its fusions

Temperature and pH optima of purified plant-produced AnPGI were determined and were compared with previously described results of Aspergillus niger-produced enzyme [25]. Recombinant AnPGI, independent of its subcellular localization, showed similar biochemical properties as the native Aspergillus enzyme with respect to its pH optimum (pH 5.0) (Figure 5). However, the temperature optimum was found to be at least 10°C lower than results previously reported for native AnPGI [25], presenting 80-100% activity at a broad temperature range, from 20-40°C (Figure 6A).
Figure 5

The pH profile of An PGI transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The purified polygalacturonase, AnPGI and its fusions with ELP or HFBI were assayed at pH ranging from 3.0 to 6.0, in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer and at pH 6.0 to 9.0, in 50 mM sodium-phosphate buffers at 40°C. Each point was determined in triplicate and shown as the average ± standard error.
Figure 6

Temperature profile of An PGI transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. A) Purified polygalacturonase I targeted to different subcellular compartments and B) AnPGI fusions with ELP or HFBI targeted to the ER and vacuole. The enzymes were assayed at pH 5.0 and determined as the release of reducing ends of the 0.5% polygalacturonan solution in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer. The highest polygalacturonase activity is set to 100%. Each point was determined in triplicate and shown as the average ± standard error.

Temperature and pH optima of the ELP and HFBI fusion proteins were compared with those of unfused AnPGI. No differences of activity at various pH values were observed, with all proteins showing a pH optimum at pH 5.0 (Figure 5). However, the fused AnPGI recovered its native temperature optimum of 50°C and displayed a narrower temperature range than the unfused enzyme (Figure 6B).


Because of the increased interest in the conversion of biomass to biofuels, several enzymes useful in the bioconversion of plant tissues to biofuels have already been expressed using plants as bioreactors. However, the main emphasis until now has been on the expression of cellulases and xylanases targeting cellulose and hemicellulose [26]. Pectins, especially in dicots, compose 35% of primary plant cell walls and up to 5% of walls in wood tissue [27] and are critical for tissue integrity and accessibility to cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs). Previous studies have focused on the heterologous expression of polygalacturonase as a bioregulator for pathogen defense or as a modifier of plant cell wall pectin structure [4, 28]. To test the potential of plants as bioreactors for the production of polygalacturonase, we produced Aspergillus niger polygalacturonase I (AnPGI) in Nicotiana benthamiana and characterized the produced enzyme.

The subcellular accumulation of AnPGI was higher in the ER, followed by the apoplast and vacuole while no detectable AnPGI was found when targeted to the chloroplasts or cytosol. These results confirm the impact of different subcellular compartments on the accumulation of cell wall degrading enzymes, especially in the case of a protein that requires post-translational modifications. Similar results have been previously described for another Aspergillus niger cell wall degrading enzyme, β-glucosidase I, produced in stably transformed tobacco plants [29]. β-glucosidase I accumulated to very low levels when targeted to the chloroplasts or cytosol, and was not functional possibly due to lack of glycosylation [29]. The glycosylation process is initiated during protein translocation into the ER and the addition of N-glycans to the protein has been linked to diverse roles, including stability against denaturation and proteolysis, fine-tuning the charge and isoelectric point, regulating protein turnover [30], and has also been linked to protein activity [31]. Although some glycoproteins may accumulate well in the cytosol [32] and chloroplasts [33], and perform the required biological functions, others such as AnPGI may require glycosylation for stability and will not accumulate in those compartments.

The subcellular location of AnPGI within the secretory pathway had a distinct effect on its specific activity. AnPGI targeted to the vacuole showed 30% higher specific activity than AnPGI targeted to the apoplast or ER. This result is consistent with at least two other CWDEs produced in sugar cane, where activities of cellobiohydrolase I (CBH I) and CBH II were, respectively, five and two times more active when targeted to the vacuole [34] when compared with ER-targeted proteins. As well, the effect of subcellular targeting on protein activity has been observed with human gastric lipase produced in tobacco; however, in this case, the vacuolar-targeted enzyme exhibited two-fold lower specific activity compared with the same protein targeted to the apoplast or ER, probably due to proteolytic-induced instability of this specific protein when targeted to the vacuole [35]. In the case of glycosyl hydrolases, higher specific activity was expected when targeted to the vacuole, as proteomic analysis of the vegetative vacuole of Arabidopsis thaliana uncovered several glycosyl hydrolases, including a polygalacturonase [36], which indicates that the vacuole is a natural compartment for these enzymes and may provide a chemical environment that favors appropriate protein folding and activity. Therefore, and although most of the attention when analyzing protein expression in plants has been directed towards protein accumulation, protein activity may play a bigger role in the final analysis, especially when compartmentalization results in protein with low or no activity, which in many cases is due to a lack of post-translational modifications or protein truncation [29]. When compared to the previously reported specific activity of native AnPGI [21], plant-produced AnPGI showed 75 times lower specific activity. However, direct comparison of specific activities of enzymes characterized in different studies is problematic due to experimental differences as was pointed out by Kester et al. [21] and a side-by-side comparison would need to be conducted.

Recently, diverse protein fusions have been explored to increase the level of heterologous protein production in plants using technologies such as Zera [37], ELPs [16, 38] and HBFI [15]. The advantage of using these protein fusions is that besides enhancing protein accumulation in plants, they also provide a means for their purification. In the study presented here, ELP and HFBI tags were fused to AnPGI and targeted to the ER and vacuole. AnPGI::ELP transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves led to an increase in accumulation in both compartments, while AnPGI::HFBI transient expression led to a small reduction in the ER and to a drastic reduction in the vacuole. This is the first report of ELP and HFBI fusions targeted to the vacuole and the observation that ELP increases accumulation while HFBI reduces accumulation is interesting and should be further investigated. One of the hypotheses for the lower accumulation of AnPGI::HFBI is that HFBI, which is a globular protein with four disulfide bonds [39], might be affecting AnPGI folding, leading the misfolded protein to ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). Specifically for this study, a flexible linker consisting of (GGGS)3 was used to separate HFBI from AnPGI and was probably not effective enough in separating the two protein domains. One of the possible solutions for this problem is the optimization of the linker used to separate the two proteins. Optimization of linkers has been shown to improve both protein expression yield and biological activity [40]. A recent study comparing several linkers demonstrated the need for empirical evaluation of different linkers, and the possible beneficial effect of twistable linkers on activity of the fusion partners, possibly by allowing a reorientation of the functional domains [32]. Moreover, the addition of ELP and HFBI fusions had adverse effects on enzyme activity. Although these results were not predicted, they were not completely unexpected. Previous studies using ELP tags have shown different outcomes on protein activity [38, 41] and impact of fusion tags on recombinant protein activity needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

More specifically in the case of AnPGI::ELP targeted to the vacuole, because the loss of activity was directly proportional to the increase in accumulation, the ELP fusion may still offer a viable option in the production of this enzyme for industrial purposes. ELPs are thermally responsive synthetic biopolymers [22] that are valuable for simple nonchromatographic bioseparation of recombinant proteins. Because of this property, and taking into consideration the amount of enzyme that will be necessary for the production of soluble sugars, the use of this technology could represent a potential solution to lower the enzyme cost in the process by recycling the enzyme of interest and should be further investigated.

As the HFBI fusion can also be used for bioseparation [24], the same mechanism could be used for recycling the enzyme; however in this case, as HFBI showed a detrimental effect on both protein accumulation and activity of AnPGI, improvements to the construct design for increasing accumulation of the protein fusion should be assessed prior to further developing this technology.

Although in the long term, AnPGI should be produced directly into energy crops to reduce the costs of production of second generation biofuels, the results achieved here represent a step forward towards the development of this technology. The selection of the best compartment to store and maintain bioactive enzymes was demonstrated, no necrosis was observed in plants producing AnPGI, indicating that this enzyme was not toxic at the accumulation levels obtained and can be potentially produced in stable transgenic plants. However, as the expression of pectic enzymes in the apoplast has been shown to affect plant growth and fitness [19, 42] , genetic engineering strategies like the use of inducible promoters should be explored in order to avoid negative effects on plant growth. Further, storing this enzyme in the ER or vacuole of stably transformed plants could prevent negative effects on growth and should be explored. Moreover, the combination of plant-produced cell wall degrading enzymes with an ELP fusion can be promising for reducing the costs associated with enzymatic deconstruction of plant cell walls.


In conclusion, this study demonstrated the feasibility of using plants as bioreactors for the production of active AnPGI at high levels. Both the accumulation and bioactivity of plant-produced AnPGI were affected by different sub-cellular targeting of the recombinant protein, as well as by fusion with ELP and HFBI. Such analyses allow us to select the best combination of a sub-cellular compartment and a fusion partner for production of enzymes in plants, thus maximizing their catalytic potential in downstream applications.


AnpgIplant expression vectors

The polygalacturanase I gene from A. niger (Accession # XP_001389562) was chemically synthesized (GenScript, Piscateway, NJ, USA) (AnpgI) and inserted into a series of pCaMGate plant binary expression vectors (Conley et al., in preparation) using the Gateway technology® to generate 9 expression constructs targeting 5 different compartments (apoplast, ER, vacuole, chloroplast and cytosol) and ELP and HFBI fusions targeting the ER and vacuole compartments. To produce these vectors, first AnpgI was cloned into the Gateway donor vector pDONR/Zeo™ (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) and the integrity of the construct was validated by sequence analysis. Using the Gateway cloning system, AnpgI was subsequently subcloned into the pCaMGate plant binary expression vectors (Conley et al., in preparation), derived from the pCaMterX [43] binary vector which placed the gene of interest under control of the double enhanced cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter [44] and the nopaline synthase (nos) terminator [45].

For constructs destined to the secretory pathway, downstream of the promoter, pCaMGate vectors harbor the tCUP translation enhancer [46], the Pr1b secretory signal peptide from tobacco [47] and the Xpress tag (for detection) followed by the AnPgI gene, a C-Myc detection/purification tag and a KDEL signal peptide, used for ER-retrieval. For the vacuole targeting construct, the C-terminal propeptide (CTPP) of tobacco chitinase vacuolar sorting signal [48] replaces the C-terminal KDEL; and no additonal sequence was used for secretion of AnPGI to the apoplast. For the chloroplast-targeted construct, the transit peptide from the tobacco RuBisCo small subunit replaces the secretory signal peptide and for the cytosol no extra sequence was present downstream of the translation enhancer (Figure 1A). For the fusion constructs, ELP and HFBI are placed in-frame upstream of the c-Myc tag in the pCaMGate vectors, with a (GSSS)3 linker separating AnPGI from either ELP or HFBI (Figure 1B). The final expression clones were used to transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 [49].

Transient expression in N. benthamianaand Western blot analysis

A suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 carrying the expression construct was mixed with an equal amount of Agrobacterium culture containing the suppressor of post-transcriptional gene silencing p19 from Cymbidium ringspot virus [18] and co-infiltrated into leaves of 5–6 week old N. benthamiana plants through the stomata of abaxial leaf epidermis using a syringe [16]. Infiltrated plants were maintained in a controlled growth chamber for 2 to 9 days at 22°C, with a 16 h photoperiod. For each experiment, three leaf disks (7 mm diameter) from infiltrated tissue were collected from five different plants and ground in liquid nitrogen using 2.3 mm ceramic beads (BioSpec Products, 11079125z, Bartlesville, USA) in a TissueLyser (Qiagen®). Total soluble protein was extracted from the ground tissue in ice-cold phosphate- buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 supplemented with 0.1% Tween-20, 2% PVPP (polyvinyl polypyrrolidone), 1 mM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), 100 mM sodium acorbate, 1 mM PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and 1 μg/ml leupeptin. Protein extraction from a control plant infiltrated with p19 as a negative control was also performed under similar conditions. Total soluble protein (TSP) concentration was spectrophotometrically determined using the Bradford assay [50] with bovine serum albumin as standard.

Equal volume of plant extract was separated by sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (10%) and transferred to PVDF membrane. To detect the recombinant protein the membrane was incubated with primary mouse anti-C-myc monoclonal antibody (Genscript, A00864, Piscataway, USA). The primary antibody was detected with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Bio-Rad, 170–6516, Hercules, USA) and visualized using the ECL detection kit (GE healthcare, Mississauga, Canada) and autoradiography as described by the manufacturer. Western blots were analysed using image densitometry with TotalLab TL100 software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Durhan, USA). Intensities were determined by comparison with known amounts of a synthetic positive control protein containing a cellulose-binding domain and a C-myc tag (synthesized by Genscript, Piscataway, USA).

Protein purification

For the protein activity assays, total soluble protein was extracted from plants producing AnPGI 4 days post infiltration (dpi) by grinding the agroinfiltrated samples in liquid nitrogen using ceramic beads in the TissueLyser (Qiagen®) as previously described. Samples were mixed with six volumes (w/v) of cold PBS buffer, and the homogenate was clarified twice by centrifugation (20,000 g, 10 min at 4°C) to obtain the total soluble protein (TSP). The c-Myc purification was performed by affinity chromatography using the c-Myc tagged Protein MILD PURIFICATION KIT (MBL, 3305, Woburn, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Deglycosylation analysis

Enzymatic deglycosylation of transiently produced AnPGI targeted to the apoplast, ER, and vacuole was carried out on purified protein using Endoglycosidase H (Sigma-Aldrich, A 0810, St. Louis, USA) accordingly to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Endo H specificity includes all high-mannose and hybrid type of glycans from N-linked glycoproteins. The digestion was carried out at 37°C for 3 h followed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and western-blot analysis with anti-C-myc antibody.

Enzyme assays

In planta polygalacturonase activity was assayed by estimating the amount of reducing sugar released from a 7 mm diameter leaf disk incubated in 100 μl of 50 mM of sodium acetate solution pH 5.0 at 50°C for 24 h. The amount of reducing sugar released was quantified by the DNS method [51] and the reducing sugar concentration was normalized using the assay results for control plants. Specific activity was quantitatively estimated by measuring the hydrolysis of polygalacturonic acid using an equimolar quantity of AnPGI. The reaction was carried out in 96 well flat bottom microplates using 0.5% polygalacturonic acid substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0 incubated at 50°C for 30 min. Galacturonic acid was used as the standard and the amount of galacturonic acid released was quantified by using the DNS method [51]. One unit of PGase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release one micromole of galacturonic acid per minute per mg of protein under standard assay conditions.

Effects of pH and temperature

The optimum enzyme pH was measured using polygalacturonic acid (0.5%) as the substrate in 50 mM acetate buffer, pH 3.0-6.0 and 50 mM sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0-9.0 incubated at 40°C for 30 min. The optimum temperature was determined in the range of 20°C to 90°C in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0 incubated for 30 min.

Plant cell wall saccharification

Four millimeter diameter leaf discs were collected at 4 dpi and sterilized in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min and washed twice with sterilized water. The plant material was incubated at 50°C for 24 hours in a filter-sterilized solution containing 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.0. Enzymatic saccharification efficiency was determined as the amount of reducing sugars released and compared with untreated plant material using the DNS assay.



Cell wall degrading enzyme








Gene encoding polygalacturonase I protein from Aspergillus niger


Hydrophobin I


Elastin-like polypeptide


Total soluble protein


Sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis


Endoplasmic reticulum


Polyvinyl polypyrrolidone


Phosphate-buffered saline


Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid


Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride


Horse radish peroxidase


Immunoglobulin G


Dinitro salicylic acid


Tobacco cryptic upstream promoter


Pathogenesis-related protein 1b of tobacco


C-terminal propeptide


Nopaline synthase

Endo H: 

Endoglycosidase H


Day post infiltration.



We thank Angelo Kaldis and Hong Zhu for technical support. We are grateful to Alex Molnar for help with preparing the figures. This study was supported by the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s A-base funding Program and the Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program through the Cellulosic Biofuels Network. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Affiliations

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Department of Biology, Western University
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba


  1. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD: Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007, 315: 804-807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P: Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009, 48: 3713-3729.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C: Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuel Bioprod Bior. 2007, 1: 119-134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lionetti V, Francocci F, Ferrari S, Volpi C, Bellincampi D, Galletti R, D’Ovidio R, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F: Engineering the cell wall by reducing de-methyl-esterified homogalacturonan improves saccharification of plant tissues for bioconversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 616-621.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ridley BL, O’Neill MA, Mohnen D: Pectins: structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signaling. Phytochemistry. 2001, 57: 929-967.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Abbott DW, Boraston AB: Structural biology of pectin degradation by Enterobacteriaceae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008, 72: 301-316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang M, Su R, Qi W, He Z: Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose by optimizing enzyme complexes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010, 160: 1407-1414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Andre-Leroux G, Tessier D, Bonnin E: Endopolygalacturonases reveal molecular features for processivity pattern and tolerance towards acetylated pectin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1794: 5-13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll A, Somerville C: Cellulosic biofuels. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009, 60: 165-182.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lai H, Chen Q: Bioprocessing of plant-derived virus-like particles of Norwalk virus capsid protein under current good manufacture practice regulations. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31: 573-584.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pogue GP, Vojdani F, Palmer KE, Hiatt E, Hume S, Phelps J, Long L, Bohorova N, Kim D, Pauly M, Velasco J, Whaley K, Zeitlin L, Garger SJ, White E, Bai Y, Haydon H, Bratcher B: Production of pharmaceutical-grade recombinant aprotinin and a monoclonal antibody product using plant-based transient expression systems. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010, 8: 638-654.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yu LX, Gray BN, Rutzke CJ, Walker LP, Wilson DB, Hanson MR: Expression of thermostable microbial cellulases in the chloroplasts of nicotine-free tobacco. J Biotechnol. 2007, 131: 362-369.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Richman A, Menassa R: Protein body-inducing fusions for high-level production and purification of recombinant proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011, 9: 419-433.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ahmad A, Pereira EO, Conley AJ, Richman AS, Menassa R: Green biofactories: recombinant protein production in plants. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2010, 4: 242-259.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Joensuu JJ, Conley AJ, Lienemann M, Brandle JE, Linder MB, Menassa R: Hydrophobin fusions for high-level transient protein expression and purification in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152: 622-633.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Jevnikar AM, Menassa R, Brandle JE: Optimization of elastin-like polypeptide fusions for expression and purification of recombinant proteins in plants. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009, 103: 562-573.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Patel J, Zhu H, Menassa R, Gyenis L, Richman A, Brandle J: Elastin-like polypeptide fusions enhance the accumulation of recombinant proteins in tobacco leaves. Transgenic Res. 2007, 16: 239-249.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Silhavy D, Molnar A, Lucioli A, Szittya G, Hornyik C, Tavazza M, Burgyan J: A viral protein suppresses RNA silencing and binds silencing-generated, 21- to 25-nucleotide double-stranded RNAs. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 3070-3080.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Capodicasa C, Vairo D, Zabotina O, McCartney L, Caprari C, Mattei B, Manfredini C, Aracri B, Benen J, Knox JP, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F: Targeted modification of homogalacturonan by transgenic expression of a fungal polygalacturonase alters plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 1294-1304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ziegelhoffer T, Raasch J, Austin-Phillips S: Dramatic effects of truncation and sub-cellular targeting on the accumulation of recombinant microbial cellulase in tobacco. Mol Breed. 2001, 8: 147-158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kester HCM, Visser J: Purification and characterization of polygalacturonases produced by the hyphal fungus aspergillus-niger. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 1990, 12: 150-160.Google Scholar
  22. Urry DW: Entropic elastic processes in protein mechanisms. I. Elastic structure due to an inverse temperature transition and elasticity due to internal chain dynamics. J Protein Chem. 1988, 7: 1-34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Linder MB, Szilvay GR, Nakari-Setala T, Penttila ME: Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005, 29: 877-896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Joensuu J, Conley A, Linder M, Menassa R: Bioseparation of recombinant proteins from plant extract with hydrophobin fusion technology. Methods Mol Biol. 2012, 824: 527-534.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang C, Looman AC: Efficient expression and secretion of Aspergillus niger RH5344 polygalacturonase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995, 44: 147-156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. McDonald KA: In planta production of cell wall degrading enzymes. Handbook of Bioenergy Crop Plants. Edited by: Shonnard DR. 2012, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 55-73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mohnen D: Pectin structure and biosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008, 11: 266-277.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrari S, Galletti R, Pontiggia D, Manfredini C, Lionetti V, Bellincampi D, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G: Transgenic expression of a fungal endo-polygalacturonase increases plant resistance to pathogens and reduces auxin sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 669-681.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei S, Marton I, Dekel M, Shalitin D, Lewinsohn E, Bravdo B-A, Shoseyov O: Manipulating volatile emission in tobacco leaves by expressing Aspergillus niger β-glucosidase in different subcellular compartments. Plant Biotechnol J. 2004, 2: 341-350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Helenius A, Aebi M: Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004, 73: 1019-1049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Jeoh T, Michener W, Himmel M, Decker S, Adney W: Implications of cellobiohydrolase glycosylation for use in biomass conversion. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2008, 1: 1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sainsbury F, Varennes-Jutras P, Goulet MC, D’Aoust MA, Michaud D: Tomato cystatin SlCYS8 as a stabilizing fusion partner for human serpin expression in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013, 11: 1058-1068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Tran M, Zhou B, Pettersson PL, Gonzalez MJ, Mayfield SP: Synthesis and assembly of a full-length human monoclonal antibody in algal chloroplasts. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009, 104: 663-673.Google Scholar
  34. Harrison MD, Geijskes J, Coleman HD, Shand K, Kinkema M, Palupe A, Hassall R, Sainz M, Lloyd R, Miles S, Dale JL: Accumulation of recombinant cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase in the leaves of mature transgenic sugar cane. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011, 9: 884-896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mokrzycki-Issartel N, Bouchon B, Farrer S, Berland P, Laparra H, Madelmont J-C, Theisen M: A transient tobacco expression system coupled to MALDI-TOF-MS allows validation of the impact of differential targeting on structure and activity of a recombinant therapeutic glycoprotein produced in plants. FEBS Lett. 2003, 552: 170-176.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Carter C, Pan S, Zouhar J, Avila EL, Girke T, Raikhel NV: The vegetative vacuole proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals predicted and unexpected proteins. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 3285-3303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Llop-Tous I, Ortiz M, Torrent M, Ludevid MD: The expression of a xylanase targeted to ER-protein bodies provides a simple strategy to produce active insoluble enzyme polymers in tobacco plants. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19474-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Floss DM, Sack M, Stadlmann J, Rademacher T, Scheller J, Stöger E, Fischer R, Conrad U: Biochemical and functional characterization of anti-HIV antibody–ELP fusion proteins from transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008, 6: 379-391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hakanpaa J, Paananen A, Askolin S, Nakari-Setala T, Parkkinen T, Penttila M, Linder MB, Rouvinen J: Atomic resolution structure of the HFBII hydrophobin, a self-assembling amphiphile. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 534-539.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Chen X, Zaro JL, Shen W-C: Fusion protein linkers: Property, design and functionality. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2012, 65: 1357-1369.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaldis A, Ahmad A, Reid A, McGarvey B, Brandle J, Ma S, Jevnikar A, Kohalmi SE, Menassa R: High-level production of human interleukin-10 fusions in tobacco cell suspension cultures. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013, 11: 535-545.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Biswal AK, Soeno K, Gandla ML, Immerzeel P, Pattathil S, Lucenius J, Serimaa R, Hahn MG, Moritz T, Jonsson LJ, Israelsson-Nordstrom M, Mellerowicz EJ: Aspen pectate lyase PtxtPL1-27 mobilizes matrix polysaccharides from woody tissues and improves saccharification yield. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014, 7: 11-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris LJ, Gleddie SC: A modified Rpl3 gene from rice confers tolerance of the Fusarium graminearum mycotoxin deoxynivalenol to transgenic tobacco. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2001, 58: 173-181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J: Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science. 1987, 236: 1299-1302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bevan M, Barnes WM, Chilton MD: Structure and transcription of the nopaline synthase gene region of T-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11: 369-385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu K, Malik K, Tian L, Hu M, Martin T, Foster E, Brown D, Miki B: Enhancers and core promoter elements are essential for the activity of a cryptic gene activation sequence from tobacco, tCUP. Mol Genet Genomics. 2001, 265: 763-770.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Cutt JR, Dixon DC, Carr JP, Klessig DF: Isolation and nucleotide sequence of cDNA clones for the pathogenesis-related proteins PR1a, PR1b and PR1c of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi nc induced by TMV infection. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 9861-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitale A, Raikhel NV: What do proteins need to reach different vacuoles?. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4: 149-155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A: New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res. 1993, 2: 208-218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller GL, Blum R, Glennon WE, Burton AL: Measurement of carboxymethylcellulase activity. Anal Biochem. 1960, 1: 127-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Pereira et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.