Open Access

CBD binding domain fused γ-lactamase from Sulfolobus solfataricusis an efficient catalyst for (-) γ-lactam production

BMC Biotechnology201414:40

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-40

Received: 22 November 2013

Accepted: 7 May 2014

Published: 13 May 2014

Abstract

Background

γ-lactamase is used for the resolution of γ-lactam which is utilized in the synthesizing of abacavir and peramivir. In some cases, enzymatic method is the most utilized method because of its high efficiency and productivity. The cellulose binding domain (CBD) of cellulose is often used as the bio-specific affinity matrix for enzyme immobilization. Cellulose is cheap and it has excellent chemical and physical properties. Meanwhile, binding between cellulose and CBD is tight and the desorption rarely happened.

Results

We prepared two fusion constructs of the γ-lactamase gene gla, which was from Sulfolobus solfataricus P2. These two constructs had Cbd (cellulose binding domain from Clostridium thermocellum) fused at amino or carboxyl terminus of the γ-lactamase. These two constructs were heterogeneously expressed in E. coli rosetta (DE3) as two fusion proteins. Both of them were immobilized well on Avicel (microcrystalline cellulose matrix). The apparent kinetic parameters revealed that carboxyl terminus fused protein (Gla-linker-Cbd) was a better catalyst. The Vmax and kcat value of Avicel immobilized Gla-linker-Cbd were 381 U mg-1 and 4.7 × 105 s-1 respectively. And the values of the free Gla-linker-Cbd were 151 U mg-1 and 1.8 × 105 s-1 respectively. These data indicated that the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme was upgraded after immobilization. The immobilized Gla-linker-Cbd had a 10-degree temperature optimum dropping from 80°C to 70°C but it was stable when incubated at 60°C for 48 h. It remained stable in catalyzing 20-batch reactions. After optimization, the immobilized enzyme concentration in transformation was set as 200 mg/mL. We found out that there was inhibition that occurred to the immobilized enzyme when substrate concentration exceeded 60 mM. Finally a 10 mL-volume transformation was conducted, in which 0.6 M substrate was hydrolyzed and the resolution was completed within 9 h with a 99.5% ee value.

Conclusions

Cellulose is the most abundant and renewable material on the Earth. The absorption between Cbd domain and cellulose is a bio-green process. The cellulose immobilized fusion Gla exhibited good catalytic characters, therefore we think the cellulose immobilized Gla is a promising catalyst for the industrial preparation of (-) - γ-lactam.

Keywords

Avicel Cellulose binding domain γ-lactamase (-) γ-lactam

Background

γ-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.-) is a small enzyme sub-classification in amidase [1], which could be used for the resolution of (rac)-2-azabicyclo [2.2.1] hept-5-en-3-one (γ-lactam) [2]. The well-known utilizations of (-) γ-lactam are in the synthesizing of abacavir [3] and peramivir [4]. These two drugs were applied in the treatment for HIV, hepatitis and influenza pandemic and have brought profits of several billions U.S dollars for the inventors and developers [5]. γ-Lactam could be applied in the syntheses of other leading compounds and drugs too, such as MK-0812 [6], piperidinium compound [7] and melogliptin [8]. In the three preparation methods for the optically pure enantiomers of γ-lactam [1, 911], the enzymatic method is the most often utilized method because of its high efficiency and productivity. The method was first reported by Taylor et al. [11]. In their work, microbial whole cells were used in bio-enzymatic resolution of racemic γ-lactam. Later, Littlechild and coworkers cloned and purified a (-)-γ-lactamase from Aurobacterium sp. and elucidated its catalytic mechanism by protein crystal structure resolution [12]. Up to now four (+) -γ-lactamases have been reported in the forms of E. coli recombinant proteins [1, 1214], and others are used in forms of whole cells [11, 15, 16].

In our previous research works, we immobilized a (+) γ-lactamase (Gla) from Sulfolobus solfataricus fused with a His-tags on nickel-chelating agarose and applied the immobilized enzyme in batch reactions. However, agarose is a fragile material and is much more expensive than other immobilizing matrices such as resins. These disadvantages of the agarose-immobilized enzyme confined its usage in scale application. Recently, the cellulose binding domain (CBD) of cellulose is often used as the bio-specific affinity matrix for enzyme immobilization. Compared with agarose, cellulose is much cheaper, and it has excellent chemical and physical properties. More importantly, binding between cellulose and CBD is tight and the desorption rarely happened [17]. Considering these merits of the cellulose immobilized enzyme, we wonder a cbd-fused-gla, immobilized to cellulose, represent a promising catalyst for the resolution of racemic gamma lactam?

In this paper, we developed a method in which the CBD fusion Gla was immobilized on the microcrystalline cellulose matrix (Avicel). We found that the fusion enzyme which had CBD fused at the C terminus was immobilized well on the cellulose matrix, and the immobilized enzyme was more stable than the free fusion enzyme in terms of thermo-stability. The immobilized enzyme retained most of its activity and had a relatively constant efficiency when used for batch transformations. In addition, γ-lactamase showed absolute enantioselectivity to (+)-γ-lactam. In conclusion, we believe that the fusion enzyme immobilized on cellulose, reported in this paper, is a promising catalyst for the industrial preparation of (-)- γ-lactam.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture media

Escherichia coli DH5α (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, PRC) cells were used for the cloning studies. E. coli rosetta (DE3) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) cells were used for protein expression. pET30a (+) (Invitrogen, California, USA) was used for standard cloning and expression in E. coli. The E. coli strains were routinely grown in LB medium or on LB agar plates at 37°C. To select bacterial strains carrying the appropriate recombinant plasmids, 35 μg chloramphenicol mL-1 or 50 μg kanamycin mL-1 was added to the medium. S. solfataricus P2 genomic DNA was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manasas, VA; catalog number 35092).

Extraction and purification of DNA

Plasmids were isolated using the TIANprep Mini Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, PR China) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. DNA was purified using the TIANgel Midi Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, PR China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Gene fusion of gla and cip

The cbd encoding gene encoding the partial Cbd domain (from 2113 bp to 2581 bp of gene HF912724.1, [18]) was amplified from genomic DNA of Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 (ATCC, Manasas, VA) using primer p1 and p2 with NcoI and BamHI sites respectively (Table 1). A linker sequence GSAGSA was introduced at the C terminus of cbd. The PCR protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 53°C, 1 min at 72°C and ending with a final elongation step for 10 min at 72°C. PCR was performed with Red-Pfu DNA Polymerase (Biocolors, Beijing, China). The PCR product was inserted into the according sites of pET30a and the plasmid was named as pETcbd.
Table 1

Primers used in this study

Name

Sequence (5′ → 3′) a

Description

p1 forward

CGCCATGGATTTGAAGGTTGAATTCTAC

For construction of pETcbd

p2 reverse

CGGGATCCAGCGGAGCCAGCGGAGCC CACCGGGTTCTTTACCC

p3 forward

GCGGATCCATGGGAATTAAGTTACCCACATTG

For construction of pETcbdgla

p4 reverse

CGCTCGAGTTTTTTGATTCTCTCAAATACAT

p5 forward

CGCATATGGGAATTAAGTTACCCACATTG

For construction of pETgla

p6 reverse

GCGGATCCAGCGGAGCCAGCGGAGCCTTTTTTGATTCTCTCAAATACAT

 

p7 forward

GCGGATCCAATTTGAAGGTTGAATTCTACAAC

For construction of pETglacbd

p8 forward

CGCTCGAG CACCGGGTTCTTTACCC

 

a Restriction sites are underlined, sequence encoding the linker peptide were in italics and in grey shade.

The gene encoding the γ-lactamase Gla (GenBank accession no AF290611) was amplified from genomic DNA of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 using primer p3 and p4 with BamHI and XhoI sites respectively. (Table 1). The PCR protocol was same as for cbd. The PCR product was inserted into the BamHI and XhoI sites of pETcbd and the final plasmid was named as pETcbdgla. This plasmid harbored a cbd-linker-gla fusion gene.

In a same way, gla was amplified with primer p5 and primer p6 and inserted into the NdeI and BamHI sites of pET30a (pETgla). The linker sequence was introduced at the C terminal of gla. Then cbd was amplified with primer p7 and p8 and introduced into downstream the linker sequence (BamHI and XhoI sites). The final plasmid was named as pETglacbd and it harbored a gla-linker-cbd fusion gene.

Expression of fusion gene in E. colirosetta (DE3) cells

E. coli rosetta (DE3) was chosen as the expression strain because in the strain Gla showed higher specific activity than in other strains such as E. coli (DE3) (data not shown). This is because there were many rare codons existed in gla gene. The constructs were transformed into E. coli rosetta (DE3) cells and has grown overnight at 37°C. Stock culture (5 mL) was transferred into fresh 500-mL culture medium and has grown up to an optical density of 0.8 (OD 580). Isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG) was then added to a final concentration of 1.0 mM, and after incubation for 2 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,000 × g for 10 min).

Purification of Gla fusion proteins on a nickel (Ni)-chelating column

Purification of the γ-lactamase fusion protein on the Ni-chelating column was carried out using the protocol and buffer supplied by Novagen (New Jersey, USA). Cells from the expression culture (500 mL) were suspended in 40 mL binding buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 300 mM NaCl, and 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and disrupted by ultrasonication. The crude samples were heated to 60°C for 10 min then centrifuged. The supernatant was applied to a 1-mL Novagen His•Band gravity flow column that had been equilibrated with 20 mL Ni-NTA binding buffer. The column was then washed with 20 mL wash buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 300 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The His-tagged proteins were eluted with 10 mL elution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 300 mM NaCl, and 200 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). To remove the imidazole present in the elution buffer, the eluate was applied to a 5-mL HiTrap desalting column (GE Healthcare, New Jersey, USA) connected to an ÄKTA FPLC system (GE Healthcare), and the column was eluted with 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl). The protein samples were collected and dialyzed against 5000 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0). The buffer was changed three times over a period of 24 h. The samples were then ready for use.

Immobilization of the crude or purified γ-lactamase fusion proteins on Avicel

For crude fusion proteins, cells from the expression culture (500 mL) were suspended in 40 mL ultrasonication buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0) and disrupted by ultrasonication. The ultrasonication sample was heated to 60°C for 10 min then centrifuged (13,000 × g, 10 min). 5 mL of supernatant was added with 1 g of Avicel and kept at 25°C for 120 min with stirring. For purified fusion proteins, 1 mL protein solutions (20 mg protein in 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0) were added with 100 mg Avicel and kept at 25°C for 120 min with stirring. Finally the immobilized fusion proteins were collected by centrifuge (3,000 × g, 10 min). From hereafter the mass of the immobilized enzyme was included in Avicel and the mass of the absorbed protein on Avicel. When protein concentration of immobilized enzyme was involved in calculations, only the mass of the absorbed protein was counted.

Adsorption Isotherm Measurements for crude fusion proteins

Adsorption isotherm measurements were conducted at room temperature (25°C) in 50 mL tubes. Samples containing 2,000 mg of crude fusion proteins (supernatant samples after treated at 60°C, total activity 5500 U) and 1 g of Avicel were mixed in a final aqueous volume of 5 mL. Suspensions were incubated for 120 min to allow the adsorption to saturate. The protein concentration of the supernatant was measured at regular intervals using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, USA), and this value was then subtracted from the initial amount of protein and the difference was considered to be amount of proteins adsorbed onto Avicel. Otherwise, the total activity of supernatant was measured and this value was then subtracted from the initial enzyme activity. All values were measured in triplicate.

Standard reaction conditions and γ-lactamase activity assay

γ-Lactamase activity was assayed by adding 1 mg of enzyme (or 25 mg immobilized enzyme) to 200 μL of the 4.6 mM substrate solution (pH 7.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer). If not specified, the reaction solution was incubated at 70°C for 30 min. After transformation the reaction solution was extracted with 100 μL ethyl acetate and analyzed by chiral HPLC. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the conversion of one micromole of substrate per minute. As to immobilized enzyme the absorbed protein was first calculated based on the binding capacity described above, then the activity was determined.

Temperature optimum and temperature stability determination

For temperatue optimum determination, the transformation solutions (free enzyme) or suspensions (immobilized enzyme) as described in standard reaction conditions were incubated and reacted at various temperature from 20°C to 90°C with a 10 degree interval. Then the samples were analyzed as described in standard reaction conditions and activity assay.

For temperature stability determination, 50 μL of enzyme solution (1 mg enzyme in pH 7.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer) or 100 μL of immobilized enzyme suspension (25 mg immobilized enzyme, pH 7.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer) were incubated at various temperature from 20°C to 90°C with a 10 degree interval for 30 min. Then the enzyme solution or suspension was added to the substrate solution as described in standard reaction conditions. The samples were allowed to react and later analyzed as described in standard reaction conditions and activity assay.

Analytical chiral HPLC

The reaction solution (200 μL) was extracted with 100 μL ethyl acetate, and benzamide was added to the extract as the internal standard. The ethyl acetate extract (10 μL) was applied to a Daicel Chiralpak AS-H column (Daicel, Tokyo, Japan) and eluted with a mobile phase consisting of 80% acetonitrile and 20% isopropanol (volume ratio). The UV absorbance of eluted γ-lactam was measured at 230 nm. Benzamide, (+) γ-lactam, and (-) γ-lactam had retention times of 8.7, 11.8, and 13.9 min, respectively, at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min.

Determination of the apparent kinetic parameters

The apparent kinetic parameters were determined by the Lineweaver-Burk plot. Enzymatic reactions were carried out with substrate solutions of different concentrations (ranging from 4.6 mM to 32.2 mM). To ensure accuracy, substrate conversion was controlled below 10%.

Protein assay and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

The protein concentration was determined by the BCA Protein Assay Kit from Pierce (Rockford, USA) using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. SDS-PAGE was performed as described earlier using a 6% stacking gel and 12% separating gel [19].

DNA sequencing

DNA sequencing reactions were performed on a plasmid template using the ABI Prism BigDye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kits (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) and an ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Software and online service

The BLAST × [20] program was used for protein homology search.

Results and discussion

Expression and purification of γ-lactamase fusion proteins

The γ-lactamase structural gene was a 1,515-bp fragment. The cbd encoding gene was a 469-bp fragment [18] and the linker sequence was an 18-bp fragment. The two fusion gene constructs were expressed as two separate proteins respectively. The cbd-linker-gla construct expressed a 78-kDa fusion enzyme that had a 4.7-kDa fusion peptide at its amino (N) terminus and a His-tag at its carboxyl (C) terminus (pET30a). The other construct (gla -linker-cbd) expressed a 74.2-kDa single fusion enzyme that only had a 0.9-kDa C terminal His-tag (Figure 1A). The recombinant enzymes were expressed in the soluble fraction of the bacterial lysate (Figure 1B lane 2 and 3). After single-step purification on Ni-chelating column, the purified proteins were applied for SDS-PAGE (Figure 1B lane 4 and 5). There was a low-molecular-weight protein contamination in the pure protein of gla -linker-cbd, therefore in this paper the enzyme activity of gla -linker-cbd was probably lower than the actual value.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6750-14-40/MediaObjects/12896_2013_Article_920_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Construction of cbd-linker-gla and gla-linker-cbd fusion genes (A) and expression of the two constructs (B) and adsorption isotherm measurements for crude fusion proteins (C). A. his6: his-tag encoding gene; thr and s tag: thrombin cleavage site and S peptide tag on pET30; B. 1.E. coli rosetta (DE3) harboring pET30; 2.E. coli rosetta (DE3) harboring pETcbdgla; 3.E. coli rosetta (DE3) harboring pETglacbd; 4.Purified Cbd-Linker-Gla; 5.Purified Gla-Linker-Cbd C. The total activity of Gla-Linker-Cbd supernatant at 0 h (5500 U) was set as 100% relative activity.

Comparison of the apparent kinetic parameters

Analysis of the apparent kinetic parameters revealed obvious differences in the Km, Vmax and k cat values of the two forms of free fusion γ-lactamase protein. The changes in these values indicated that the N-terminal Cbd fusion enzyme showed lower substrate affinity than the C-terminal Cbd fusion enzyme, and its Vmax and k cat values were also much lower than the C-terminal fusion enzyme (Table 2). After immobilization the Km and Vmax values of both fusion proteins were improved, and their k cat values were also upgrade significantly. However, there was no obvious difference on enzyme turnover number between the C-terminal Cbd fused enzyme and the N-terminal Cbd fused enzyme.
Table 2

Apparent kinetic parameters of the free fusion proteins and their immobilized counterparts

Fusion protein

Km(mmol l-1)

Vmax(U mg-1)

k cat (s-1)

Cbd-Linker-Gla

14.3 ± 1.6

71.6 ± 4.2

8.8 × 104

Immobilized Cbd-Linker-Gla

34.0 ± 1.6

344.9 ± 31.2

4.2 × 105

Gla -Linker- Cbd

5.7 ± 0.1

151.5 ± 30.3

1.8 × 105

Immobilized Gla -Linker- Cbd

25.0 ± 1.6

381.6 ± 44.2

4.7 × 105

Adsorption isotherm measurements for crude fusion proteins and purified Gla-Linker-Cbd

To make the method more feasible, first we tried to absorb the crude fusion proteins (supernatants after ultrasonication) on Avicel. The adsorption isotherms of the two crude fusion proteins were measured. However, the protein concentration changes were too small and the experiment errors were far beyond normal values. Therefore, the relative activities of the crude protein supernatants instead of the protein concentration were determined. After absorption the remaining supernatants and the enzyme absorbed Avicels were applied for (rac)-γ-lactam transformation at 60°C and then the transformations were analyzed by chiral HPLC respectively. The total activities of the supernatant and immobilized enzyme were calculated. According to Figure 1C, the binding between Gla-Linker-Cbdand Avicel was faster than the binding between Cbd-Linker-Gla and Avicel. The binding was in a stable state after 120 min absorption. The purified fusion proteins were also used in the absorption experiments. Both the adsorption ratios of the two purified proteins on Avicel were 40 ± 6 mg protein per g Avicel. The binding capacity was calculated to be 0.8 ± 0.1 μM/g, which was in the range for CBD-fusion proteins [2123]. The binding saturation time of the purified protein was same as the crude protein (data not shown). Based on the above experiment result, Gla-Linker-Cbd immobilized protein was chose for further experiments.

Comparison of the temperature property of free Gla-Linker-Cbd protein and its immobilized counterpart

The temperature optima and thermostability of Gla-Linker-Cbd and its immobilized counterpart were determined. The optimal temperature of Gla protein was at 80°C [2]. However, after fused with Cbd the optimal temperatures of the fusion protein and its immobilized counterpart dropped from 80°C to 70°C (Figure 2A). The immobilized enzyme exhibited higher specific activity than the free enzyme. Meanwhile, according to Figure 2B, after incubated at 80°C for 30 min, the fusion protein lost almost 80% of its original activities while its immobilized counterpart only lost 30% of its original activities.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6750-14-40/MediaObjects/12896_2013_Article_920_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Comparison of the optimal temperatures (A) and thermostabilities (B) between free Gla-Linker-Cbd protein and its immobilized counterpart, and thermostability of immobilized Gla-Linker-Cbd at 60°C and 70°C (C) and batch stability (D). A. Optimal temperature; B. Thermostability. The activity of immobilized Gla-Linker-Cbd at 70°C (A) or firstly incubated at 30°C for 30 min (B, 145 ± 12 U mg-1) was set as 100% relative activity. In B, firstly enzymes were incubated at designated temperature for 30 min then applied for catalysis. The activity of immobilized Gla-Linker-Cbd in cubated at 60°C (C) or the first batch (D, 116 ± 6 U mg-1) was set as 100% relative activity.

Protein thermostability was often related to protein rigidity [24]. In C. thermocellum most of the Cbd fusion enzymes showed maximum activity at 65°C or 75°C, and had weak thermostabilities at 80°C [2527]. Therefore, compared to Gla the rigidity of the fusion protein probably was reduced. In this balance process Cbd was the determinant part to affect the protein thermostability.

Stability of immobilized enzymes at 60°C and 70°C

All the other conditions were same as described in standard transformation conditions. The thermostability of the immobilized enzyme was tested at 60°C and 70°C respectively. The immobilized enzyme was stable at 60°C even incubated for 48 h. However, when incubated at 70°C for 1 h the enzyme lost their 20% of the initial activity. If the incubation time extended to 48 h, the immobilized enzyme lost their 40% initial activity (Figure 2C). The batch stability was tested at 60°C for 20 batches reactions. After each transformation, the immobilized enzyme was collected by centrifuge and applied for another transformation. According to Figure 2D, the immobilized enzyme maintained almost 100% of their initial activity after 20 batches reactions.

Optimization of the concentrations of immobilized enzymes and substrate in batch transformation

In term of cost saving, in a transformation the substrate concentration should be as high as possible, and the transformation time should be as short as possible. Taking into account of these two factors, we tested first the highest immobilized enzyme concentration employed in the system, and then the highest substrate concentration. In these optimizations, the initial velocity of transformation was used as the response factor. According to Figure 3A, the optimal enzyme amount in the transformation system was 200 mg/mL. Beyond or below this value, the initial velocity of reaction dropped dramatically. It was easy to understand that lower enzyme amount meant lower catalytic activity. On the other hand, 200 mg immobilized enzyme almost had an autogenous volume of 0.5 mL in transformation buffer, and it was impossible to stir the reaction suspension sufficiently in the situation. Therefore the mass transfer efficiency of the system was probably affected severely [28] and the initial velocity of the enzyme was reduced significantly.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6750-14-40/MediaObjects/12896_2013_Article_920_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Optimal concentration of immobilized enzyme (A) and substrate (B), and time course of the optimized transformation (C) and chiral HPLC analyses of the ( rac )-γ-lactam control (D) and sample after the 9 h transformation (E). The activity of 200 mg/ml immobilized Gla-Linker-Cbd at 60°C (A, 120.6 ± 5.2 μmol/min) and immobilized Gla-Linker-Cbd to 60 mM substrate (B, 338.6 ± 15.2 μmol/min) was set as 100% relative activity. The line in dot in B represents no substrate inhibition to enzyme. C: Substrate concentration 0.6 M, immobilized enzyme concentration 200 mg/ml, transformation temperature 60°C.

The enzyme initial velocity would be upgraded by increasing the substrate amount till it reached and maintained maximum activity if there was no substrate inhibition [29]. According to Figure 3B, when the substrate concentration exceeded 60 mM, the initial velocity of the enzyme dropped obviously, which indicated that substrate inhibition occurred.

Though there is substrate inhibition, it does not mean that higher concentration can’t be applied. We tested the maximum substrate concentration for 200 mg/mL immobilized enzyme in prolonged reaction time. When the substrate concentration was below 0.6 M, the reaction conversion reached 49.8% in various time. If the substrate concentration was beyond this value, the conversion hardly reached 40% even transformed for 96 h, which was very uneconomical (data not shown).

After optimization, we conducted a 10 mL-volume transformation in which 2 g immobilized enzyme was suspended in 0.6 M substrate buffer solution. The reaction was conducted at 60°C and at a certain time interval, 10 μL of sample aliquot was extracted with ethyl-acetate and then applied for chiral HPLC analysis. According to Figure 3C, the transformation was completed within 9 h (49.5% conversion). The ee value of the remaining substrate (-) γ-lactam was 99.5% (Figure 3E). The reaction solution was extracted with 30 mL dichloromethane each time for three times. The combined solvent was recovered by using rotary evaporator. At last, 0.30 g (-) γ-lactam in crystal was recovered from the transformation solution, and the recovery rate was 92%.

Conclusions

In our previous work, we employed a single purification and immobilization method to immobilize Sulfolobus solfataricus γ-lactamase on Ni-NTA agarose. The method is simple and easy to conduct. And as we reported previously [2]Vmax and kcat value of the agarose immobilized enzyme were around 450 U mg-1 and 4.2 × 105 s-1 respectively, which indicated it was also an efficient immobilized catalyst same as the cellulose immobilized enzyme. However because of the fragility of agarose, the activity of immobilized enzyme decreased sharply after multiple usages probably due to the structure crash of agarose. It was clear that the decrease did not come from protein inactivation, because under the same condition the enzyme was not deactivated even for a longer time. On the contrary cellulose is a strong material. Therefore it is a very good candidate as immobilizing material also because it is the most abundant and renewable material on the Earth. And most importantly, unlike glutaraldehyde cross-linked immobilization, the absorption between Cbd domain and cellulose is a bio-green process, in which no extra energy or expensive and harming catalyst is needed. Based on the data provided in this paper we think the cellulose immobilized Gla is a promising catalyst for the industrial preparation of (-)-γ-lactam, which is a very important drug intermediate.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by National Natural Science foundation of China no. 31070718.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Toogood HS, Brown RC, Line K, Keene PA, Taylor SJC, McCague R, Littlechild JA: The use of a thermostable signature amidase in the resolution of the bicyclic synthon (rac)-gamma-lactam. Tetrahedron. 2004, 60 (3): 711-716. 10.1016/j.tet.2003.11.064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang J, Zhang X, Min C, Wu S, Zheng G: Single-step purification and immobilization of γ-lactamase and on-column transformation of 2-azabicyclo [2.2.1] hept-5-en-3-one. Process Biochem. 2011, 46 (1): 81-87. 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.07.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Vince R, Hua M: Synthesis of Carbovir and Abacavir from a Carbocyclic Precursor. 2001, In: Current Protocols in Nucleic Acid Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Gubareva LV, Webster RG, Hayden FG: Comparison of the activities of zanamivir, oseltamivir, and RWJ-270201 against clinical isolates of influenza virus and neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant variants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001, 45 (12): 3403-3408. 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3403-3408.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Singh R, Vince R: 2-Azabicyclo [2.2.1] hept-5-en-3-one: Chemical Profile of a Versatile Synthetic Building Block and its Impact on the Development of Therapeutics. Chem Rev. 2012, 112 (8): 4642-4686. 10.1021/cr2004822.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wisniewski T, Bayne E, Flanagan J, Shao Q, Wnek R, Matheravidathu S, Fischer P, Forrest MJ, Peterson L, Song X, Yang L, Demartino JA, Struthers M: Assessment of chemokine receptor function on monocytes in whole blood: In vitro and ex vivo evaluations of a CCR2 antagonist. J Immunol Methods. 2010, 352 (1–2): 101-110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor JD: COPD and the response of the lung to tobacco smoke exposure. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2010, 23 (5): 376-383. 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.04.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Malhotra S, Man SF, Sin DD: Emerging drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2006, 11 (2): 275-291. 10.1517/14728214.11.2.275.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. King CH, Meckler H, Herr RJ, Trova MP, Glick SD, Maisonneuve IM: Synthesis of enantiomerically pure (+)- and (-)-18-methoxycoronaridine hydrochloride and their preliminary assessment as anti-addictive agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2000, 10 (5): 473-476. 10.1016/S0960-894X(00)00033-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Potter GA, Garcia C, McCague R, Adger B, Collet A: Oscillating Crystallization of (+) and (-) Enantiomers during Resolution by Entrainment of 2-Azabicyclo [2.2.1] hept-5-en-3-one. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1996, 35 (15): 1666-1668. 10.1002/anie.199616661.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor SJC, Mccague R, Wisdom R, Lee C, Dickson K, Ruecroft G, Obrien F, Littlechild J, Bevan J, Roberts SM, Evans CT: Development of the Biocatalytic Resolution of 2-Azabicyclo [2.2.1] Hept-5-En-3-One as an Entry to Single-Enantiomer Carbocyclic Nucleosides. Tetrahedron-Asymmetr. 1993, 4 (6): 1117-1128. 10.1016/S0957-4166(00)80218-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Line K, Isupov MN, Littlechild JA: The crystal structure of a (-) gamma-lactamase from an Aureobacterium species reveals a tetrahedral intermediate in the active site. J Mol Biol. 2004, 338 (3): 519-532. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Taylor SJC, Brown RC, Keene PA, Taylor IN: Novel screening methods - The key to cloning commercially successful biocatalysts. Bioorgan Med Chem. 1999, 7 (10): 2163-2168. 10.1016/S0968-0896(99)00146-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhu S, Gong C, Song D, Gao S, Zheng G: Discovery of a Novel (+)-gamma-Lactamase from Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6 by Rational Genome Mining. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78 (20): 7492-7495. 10.1128/AEM.01398-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li HQ, Su L, Yang L, Wang JJ, Zheng GJ: Study on the screening of lactamase and its fermentation conditions. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2006, 46 (4): 571-575.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor SJC, Sutherland AG, Lee C, Wisdom R, Thomas S, Roberts SM, Evans C: Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of (-)-Carbovir Utilizing a Whole Cell Catalyzed Resolution of 2-Azabicyclo [2.2.1] Hept-5-En-3-One. J Chem Soc Chem Comm. 1990, 1120-1121. 16
  17. Bayer EA, Morag E, Lamed R: The cellulosome–a treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1994, 12 (9): 379-386. 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yaron S, Morag E, Bayer EA, Lamed R, Shoham Y: Expression, purification and subunit-binding properties of cohesins 2 and 3 of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome. FEBS Lett. 1995, 360 (2): 121-124. 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00074-J.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227 (5259): 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mount DW: Database searching for similar sequences. Bioinformatics sequence and genome analysis. Chapter 7. Edited by: Cuddihy J. 2001, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 300-315.Google Scholar
  21. Medve J, Stahlberg J, Tjerneld F: Isotherms for adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I and II from Trichoderma reesei on microcrystalline cellulose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1997, 66 (1): 39-56. 10.1007/BF02788806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Santiago-Hernandez JA, Vasquez-Bahena JM, Calixto-Romo MA, Xoconostle-Cazares GB, Ortega-Lopez J, Ruiz-Medrano R, Montes-Horcasitas MC, Hidalgo-Lara ME: Direct immobilization of a recombinant invertase to Avicel by E-coli overexpression of a fusion protein containing the extracellular invertase from Zymomonas mobilis and the carbohydrate-binding domain CBDCex from Cellulomonas fimi. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2006, 40 (1): 172-176. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.052.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomme P, Heriban V, Claeyssens M: Adsorption of two cellobiohydrolases fromTrichoderma reesei to Avicel: Evidence for “exo-exo” synergism and possible “loose complex” formation. Biotechnol Lett. 1990, 12 (7): 525-530. 10.1007/BF01086347.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Radestock S, Gohlke H: Exploiting the Link between Protein Rigidity and Thermostability for Data-Driven Protein Engineering. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2008, 8 (5): 507-522. 10.1002/elsc.200800043.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernandes AC, Fontes CMGA, Gilbert HJ, Hazlewood GP, Fernandes TH, Ferreira LMA: Homologous xylanases from Clostridium thermocellum: evidence for bi-functional activity, synergism between xylanase catalytic modules and the presence of xylan-binding domains in enzyme complexes. Biochem J. 1999, 342: 105-110. 10.1042/0264-6021:3420105.Google Scholar
  26. Kataeva I, Li XL, Chen H, Choi SK, Ljungdahl LG: Cloning and sequence analysis of a new cellulase gene encoding CelK, a major cellulosome component of Clostridium thermocellum: evidence for gene duplication and recombination. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181 (17): 5288-5295.Google Scholar
  27. Kim H, Jung KH, Pack MY: Molecular characterization of xynX, a gene encoding a multidomain xylanase with a thermostabilizing domain from Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000, 54 (4): 521-527. 10.1007/s002530000412.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Fessner WD, Jones JB: Biocatalysis and biotransformation - From discovery to application - Editorial overview. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2001, 5 (2): 103-105. 10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00177-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Reed MC, Lieb A, Nijhout HF: The biological significance of substrate inhibition: a mechanism with diverse functions. Bioessays. 2010, 32 (5): 422-429. 10.1002/bies.200900167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement