Molecular cloning, characterization, genomic organization and promoter analysis of the α1,6-fucosyltransferase gene (fut8) expressed in the rat hybridoma cell line YB2/0
© Teylaert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 24 February 2010
Accepted: 5 January 2011
Published: 5 January 2011
The rat hybridoma cell line YB2/0 appears a good candidate for the large-scale production of low fucose recombinant mAbs due to its lower expression of fut8 gene than other commonly used rodent cell lines. However, important variations of the fucose content of recombinant mAbs are observed in production culture conditions. To improve our knowledge on the YB2/0 fucosylation capacity, we have cloned and characterized the rat fut8 gene.
The cDNAs encoding the rat α1,6-fucosyltransferase (FucT VIII) were cloned from YB2/0 cells by polymerase chain reaction-based and 5' RNA-Ligase-Mediated RACE methods. The cDNAs contain an open reading frame of 1728 bp encoding a 575 amino acid sequence showing 94% and 88% identity to human and pig orthologs, respectively. The recombinant protein expressed in COS-7 cells exhibits a α1,6-fucosyltransferase activity toward human asialo-agalacto-apotransferrin. The rat fut8 gene is located on chromosome 6 q and spans over 140 kbp. It contains 9 coding exons and four 5'-untranslated exons. FISH analysis shows a heterogeneous copy number of fut8 in YB2/0 nuclei with 2.8 ± 1.4 mean copy number. The YB2/0 fut8 gene is expressed as two main transcripts that differ in the first untranslated exon by the usage of distinct promoters and alternative splicing. Luciferase assays allow defining the minimal promoting regions governing the initiation of the two transcripts, which are differentially expressed in YB2/0 as shown by duplex Taqman QPCR analysis. Bioinformatics analysis of the minimal promoter regions upstream exons E-2 and E-3, governing the transcription of T1 and T2 transcripts, respectively, evidenced several consensus sequences for potential transcriptional repressors. Transient transfections of Rat2 cells with transcription factor expression vectors allowed identifying KLF15 as a putative repressor of T1 transcript in Rat2 cells.
Altogether, these data contribute to a better knowledge of fut8 expression in YB2/0 that will be useful to better control the fucosylation of recombinant mAbs produced in these cells.
Several independent studies have clearly shown that effector functions of recombinant therapeutic IgG are directly dependent on the glycosylation of the constant region (Fc) [1–3]. Each heavy chain of IgG1 Fc fragment contains a single N-glycosylation site substituted by a biantennary complex glycan. The minimal core structure is a heptasaccharide (GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2) potentially substituted by galactose (Gal), bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), sialic acid (Neu5Ac) and/or fucose (Fuc) residue α1,6-linked to the first GlcNAc attached to Asn297 of IgG heavy chains .
IgG Fc oligosaccharides determine the overall conformation of the Fc fragment  and modulate the capacity of IgG to interact with FcγR . Therefore, it is clearly established that the Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) is dependent on appropriate glycosylation of the Fc region of mAbs (for review ). The specific role in ADCC of each monosaccharide substituting the core structure has been studied in details, showing the key role of the core fucose in cellular toxicity [8–10]. Low fucose IgG1 (10-20%) exhibit a higher ADCC activity compared to highly fucosylated IgG (80-90%) either in vitro  or in vivo .
The most widely used recombinant antibodies are produced by rodent mammalian cell lines with intrinsic fucosyltransferase activity (e.g., Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), mouse myeloma and hybridoma cell lines). Therefore, almost all licensed therapeutic antibodies developed to date are heavily fucosylated [11, 12], which results in a non-optimized ADCC. Reducing the α1,6-fucose rate of IgG Fc has been a challenge over the last few years to provide maximum efficiency to recombinant mAbs.
In mammals, the GDP-L-Fuc: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide α1,6-fucosyltransferase (α1,6-FucT) is the only enzyme able to catalyze the transfer of a Fuc residue in α1,6-linkage to the first GlcNAc residue of N-glycan chains . GDP-fucose, the unique donor substrate of fucosyltransferases, is synthesized in the cytoplasm from GDP-mannose, via three enzymatic reactions carried out by two proteins: GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (GMD) and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose 3,5-epimerase, 4-reductase (FX) [14, 15]. The GDP-fucose is then transported into the lumen of the Golgi apparatus by a GDP-fucose transporter (GFT) located at the Golgi membrane , where it serves as a substrate in the synthesis of fucosylated glycoconjugates [15, 17, 18]. α1,6-FucT is encoded by the fut8 gene and different strategies targeting fut8 or other fucose-related genes have been developed to reduce the fucosylation capacity of recombinant mAb producing cells. The fut8 gene , the GMD gene , or both  have been knockdown in CHO cells, generating completely non-fucosylated recombinant mAbs. Fut8 siRNA was also used for engineering CHO cells to upgrade effector function of produced antibodies  and recently, short-hairpin-RNA has been developed for the silencing of fut8 in CHO, resulting in an enhanced antibody immune effector function . Glycosylation inhibitors were also proposed to enhance cellular toxicity of recombinant IgG  and lectin-affinity chromatography techniques have been applied to enrich in non-fucosylated species the produced recombinant mAbs .
Alternative cell lines have been tested for the reduction of core fucose on recombinant mAbs. The Lec13 mutant CHO cell line, partially deficient in GMD  was used to produce human IgG1 that were deficient in fucose . As an alternative, the rat hybridoma cell line YB2/0 was proposed as a good candidate for the large-scale production of low fucose IgG . Thus, this cell line has a very good capacity of IgG biosynthesis and its fucose transfer capacity is much lower than the other rodent cell lines commonly used . However, important variations of the fucose content has been observed for the producing clones in production culture conditions , indicating that a better knowledge of the capacity of the YB2/0 fucosylation machinery is required for optimizing the fucosylation of recombinant mAbs at the production level. Thus, we have analyzed the fucosylation capacity of YB2/0 and we report here the molecular cloning of the rat fut8 cDNA, the fut8 gene organization including 5'-untranslated exons and transcription start-sites, the number of fut8 copies in YB2/0 nuclear genome and the analysis of two promoter regions (P1 and P2) governing fut8 transcription in these cells. In particular, we identified several potential repressor binding sequences in both minimal promoters and showed that KLF15 can repress the activity of P1 promoter region.
The rat cell line YB2/0 was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, http://www.atcc.org; catalog n° CRL-1662) and grown in EMS™ medium (optimized and patented culture medium developed by the Laboratoire Français du Fractionnement et des Biotechnologies, Lille, France) supplemented with 5% heat inactivated FCS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37°C under 5% CO2. The rat Rat2 cell line (ATCC n° CRL-1764) and COS-7 (ATCC n° CRL-1651) were cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, DMEM, (BioWittaker, Lonza, Brussels, Belgium) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS and 2 mM of L-glutamine (Lonza, Brussels, Belgium) at 37°C in 5% CO2.
In silico analysis was performed with BLAST analysis of rat genomic and expressed sequence tags (EST) divisions of the NCBI databases http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez. Multiple sequence alignments were performed with the Clustal W program http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html. Expasy site http://www.expasy.ch was used for protein analysis. Analysis of minimal promoter regions was performed with Matinspector 2.2 http://www.genomatix.de using TRANSFAC matrices 4.0  with "core similarity: 0.9" and "matrices similarity: Optimized". Filters corresponding to myeloid and lymphoid cells were used to screen specific cells transcription factors.
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
YB2/0 cells were used as source of RNA. Total RNA was extracted using the Nucleospin RNA II (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Total RNA (2 μg) was reverse-transcribed using first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany).
Molecular cloning of rat α1,6 fucosyltransferase cDNA
The α1,6-fucosyltransferase open reading frame was amplified from 1 μL of YB2/0 cells cDNA with the primer pair 5F8r2: 5'-agtcgccacaggattacc-3'and 3F8r2: 5'-atctgcttagccgagatg-3' at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles (94°C, for 30 sec; 50°C for 45 sec; 68°C for 2 min 10 sec) and an extension step of 10 min at 68°C. The PCR product was cloned into the pCR II-Blunt TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The encoding sequence was isolated by digestion of the vector using HindIII and XbaI restriction sites. The purified fragment was subcloned into pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) digested by HindIII and XbaI. The resultant plasmid was designed pcDNA-Fut8. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA-Fut8 or the empty plasmid using lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection.
Preparation of the asialo-agalacto apotransferrin acceptor substrate
After dialysis against sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5), 5 mg of human apotransferrin (Sigma-Aldrich, Lyon, France) were incubated with 120 mU of Arthrobacter ureafasciens neuraminidase (Sigma-Aldrich, Lyon, France) and 50 mU of Escherichia Coli β-galactosidase (Sigma-Aldrich, Lyon, France) at 37°C for 24 h in a final volume of 10 mL. After 4 h of dialysis against water, asialo-agalacto-apotransferrin was freeze-dried. The absence of galactose and sialic acid residues was controlled by GC-MS.
COS-7 cells, transiently transfected with pcDNA-Fut8 or the empty plasmid, were harvested by scrapping in a 4 mM EDTA solution, pelleted by low-speed centrifugation and resuspended in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100), containing a cocktail of proteases and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The protein concentration of protein extracts was determined with the Micro BCA™Protein Assay Reagent kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Rockford, IL, USA).
Enzyme assays were performed with 20 μL of protein extract (140 μg/mL), 70 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) 10 mM L-fucose, 6 μM GDP-[14C]-L-fucose (299 mCi/mmol, Amersham Biosciences, Pantin, France), 10 mM GDP-fucose and 100 μg asialo-agalacto human apotransferrin as acceptor substrate, in a final volume of 50 μL, at 30°C for 4 h. The reaction was stopped with 150 μL of RT water, precipitated with 1 mL of 5% phosphotungstic acid and processed for scintillation counting. The transfer of [14C]-fucose is expressed in cpm.
Amplification of 5'cDNA ends by RNA-Ligase-Mediated RACE (RLM-RACE)
RLM-RACE  amplifications were performed using the GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Initial reverse transcription was performed with the oligo dT primer using 5 μg of total RNA. After synthesis of the first strand cDNA, PCR were performed with the GeneRacer5'Primer from the kit and a gene-specific primer 3F8Race3 5'-cttcccgtagccgtcccctggtcaa-3' at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 38 cycles (94°C, for 45 sec; 57°C for 45 sec; 68°C for 1 min 45 sec) and an extension step of 10 min at 68°C. Nested PCR were performed with the GeneRacer5'Primer Nested provided in the kit and a gene-specific primer 3F8Race4 5'-actcagccattcgcctcaagtcttc-3', using 2 μL of the first PCR amplification and the same conditions as the first PCR. PCR amplifications were performed with Taq AccuPrime (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the provider's instructions. Nested-PCR products were size separated by Agarose gel electrophoresis, subcloned into pCR4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and sequenced by Genoscreen (Lille, France).
Reverse transcription and quantitative PCR
The expression of the transcripts 1 and 2 was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. 2 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with poly-T oligonucleotide using Affinity script QPCR cDNA Synthesis kit (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Parallel reactions without SuperScript (RT controls) were performed to assess the degree of contaminating genomic DNA.
Probes and primer sequences used for TaqMan™ quantitative PCR experiments
FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization)
The YB2/0 cell line was grown in EMS™ medium supplemented with 5% heat inactivated FCS for 72 hours prior cell fixation and in situ hybridization. Primary rat lymphocytes were isolated from rat blood following standard procedures. The probes used for the FISH analysis were designed and prepared as follow: fut8 and a non relevant probe (NRP) for rat genome were designed by using respectively 3 and 2 BACs. Bacteria were amplified in LB Broth, and then BACs were purified on Anion Exchange columns (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) following the manufacturer's instructions. Probes labeling was then performed using the ARES Alexa Fluor 488 Labeling kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), while the purification was done with the PureLink PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To avoid probes unspecific binding to repetitive DNA sequences, samples were precipitated with 1 μg of Rat Hybloc competitor DNA (Insight Biotechnology Limited, Wembley, UK).
The FISH assays were carried out in standard conditions. Fluorescent DNA probes and samples were denatured for 10 min at 73°C. The hybridizations were performed overnight at 37°C in a humidified chamber. The coverslides were then washed 3 times at 45°C with 50% formamide in SSC2X, one time in SSC2X before a final wash in SSC2X, 0.1% NP-40. Finally, nuclei were counterstained for 30 min at 4°C in darkness, with DAPI III/mountain medium (Abbott-France, Rungis, France) before observation under an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, BX61) using appropriated fluorescent filters.
Raw data of the FISH analysis were compared with statistical methods by using SPSS 13.0 software. Data were analyzed under the normality test Kolmogorov-Smirnov, before applying non parametric Kruskal-Wallis and U-Mann Whitney tests. Statistical differences between samples were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Construction of reporter plasmids for luciferase assays
Reporter plasmids for T1 transcript luciferase assays.
Position of the fragment
Primers used for the construction of plasmids for T2 transcript luciferase assays.
Transient transfections and luciferase assay
Rat2 cells were transiently transfected using lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, using 1 μg/mL of pGL3b construction and 10 ng/mL of control Renilla plasmid in OptiMEM medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After 6 h, the medium was changed for fresh cell culture medium and incubated for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were then washed one time with PBS, lysed in 150 μL of Passive Lysis Buffer (PLB, Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System, Promega, Madison, USA) and 20 μL of lysate were used for luciferase Reporter Assay System. Luminescence was measured with the Centro luminometer (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany).
The YB2/0 cells were transiently transfected with Cell line Nucleofector® kitV (Amaxa Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) according to manufacturer's instructions. 2 × 106 cell pellets were resuspended in 100 μL of Nucleofector® kitV solution. The cell suspensions were mixed with 2 μg of pGL3b construction and 20 ng of control Renilla plasmid. The mixtures were transferred into an Amaxa cuvette and submitted to nucleofection using the T-020 program. Cells were plated on 6-well plates with 2 mL of culture medium and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were then centrifuged 5 min at 1,200 rpm, washed one time with PBS and processed for luciferase reporter assay as described for Rat2.
The pcDNA3.1 expression vector encoding the human KLF15 transcription factor (pcDNA-hKLF15) was kindly provided by Dr. Otteson, College of Optometry, University of Houston, USA. For transfection of Rat2 cells, 25 to 500 ng/mL of pcDNA-hKLF15 vector were added to the lipofection mix.
Nuclear and cytoplasm protein extraction, Western blotting analysis
48 hours after transfection with KLF15 vector, Rat2 cells were lysed on ice in a hypotonic buffer (Hepes 10 mM, MgCl2 1,5 mM, KCl 10 mM, pH 7.9) supplemented with 0.125% NP-40 and protease cocktail inhibitors (Roche, Meylan, France). The lysate was centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 g and the cytosolic fraction was obtained in the supernatant. The pellet corresponding to the nuclear fraction was lysed with hypertonic buffer (Hepes 20 mM, MgCl2 1.5 mM, EDTA 0.2 mM, NaCl 0.5 M, glycerol 25%, pH 7.9) supplemented with protease cocktail inhibitors on ice during two hours. The protein concentration of both fractions was determined with the Micro BCA™Protein Assay Reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). 20 μg of total proteins were boiled for 10 min in reducing Laemmli sample buffer and resolved by SDS-PAGE on 8% mini-gels (Bio-Rad, Richmond, USA). After transfer onto a nitrocellulose membrane (80 mA overnight), blocking was performed using TBS (Tris Buffer Saline) containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk for one hour at room temperature (RT). Incubations with 2.5 μg/mL anti-KLF15 mAb (AbCam, Cambridge, UK) or 0.04 μg/mL anti-actin mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Europe) were performed one hour at RT in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk. After washing, membranes were incubated for 1 h at RT with 1/15,000 dilution in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk of horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-goat IgG for KLF15 or anti-rabbit IgG for actin. Membranes were finally washed three times for 10 min in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20 and detection was achieved using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL+® advanceWestern blotting detection reagents, Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, Buks, U.K.).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA)
Biotin 5' end-labeled (-892/-451) promoter DNA probe was obtained by PCR from pGL3(-892/-451) plasmid using biotin 5' end-labeled primers (forward P1 min 5'-gctagcgccggcccgaggct-3', reverse P1 min 5'-cgatcggcgccgtcccccgt-3'). Rat2 cells nuclear extract was prepared as previously described. EMSA was performed with a Lightshift® Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA) as follows. Nuclear extract (3 μg protein) was incubated for 20 min at room temperature in 1 × binding buffer, 2.5% glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 ng/μL Poly(dI-dC), 0.05% NP-40 and 20 fmol of biotin-labeled probe, in a final volume of 20 μL. 4 pmol of unlabeled (-892/-451) promoter DNA were added to the binding reaction mixture for competition studies. For supershift analysis, 1 μg of anti-KLF15 mAb (AbCam, Cambridge, UK) was pre-incubated with nuclear extract for 1 h at 4°C prior to the binding reaction. Reaction products were separated by electrophoresis in a 4% polyacrylamide gel (29:1, acrylamide/N,N'-methylene bisacrylmamide) in 0.5 × TBE. The protein-DNA complexes were then transferred onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and detected by chemiluminescence.
Isolation and characterization of the rat α1,6 fucosyltransferase cDNA
In order to conclusively confirm that the YB2/0 cloned fut8 cDNA encodes an active α1,6-fucosyltransferase, the cDNA was inserted in pcDNA3.1 expression vector. The construction was transiently transfected into COS-7 cells. 72 h after transfection, the α1,6-fucosyltransferase activity was measured in cell extracts using asialo-agalacto apotransferrin as acceptor substrate for in vitro assays. The α1,6-fucosyltransferase activity was 4 times higher (2135 +/- 318 cpm) in pcDNA-Fut8 transfected COS-7 cell extracts than in the control cells (500 +/- 200 cpm), confirming that the cloned cDNA encodes an active enzyme.
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Number of copies of fut8 gene in YB2/0 interphase nuclei.
Number of copies (% of cells)
4 or more
Mean ± SD
2.8 ± 1.4
2.3 ± 0.8
Identification of rat fut8transcription start sites
Quantification of transcripts in cultured cells by duplex Taqman™ QPCR
The direct quantification of T3 transcript expression was not possible because the totality of the 5'-UTR sequence is common to the sequences of the T1 and T2 transcripts. Moreover, the quantification of the total transcripts of fut8 using primers designed in E-1 and E0 exons didn't allow determining the expression level of T3. Nevertheless, the T3 transcript appeared to be weakly expressed in both cell lines compared to T1 and T2.
Promoter activity of the 5'-upstream region of T1 and T2
Bioinformatics analysis of P1 and P2 minimal promoter regions
Effect of KLF15 over-expression on the P1 minimal promoter activity
Binding of nuclear proteins to P1 minimal promoter sequence
To investigate the association between nuclear proteins and the (-892/-451) P1 minimal promoter sequence, EMSA assay was performed to determine whether Rat2 cells nuclear proteins could bind this sequence. As shown in Figure 10C, a strong band was shifted (open arrow) when the nuclear extract was incubated with the biotinylated DNA fragment. The shifted band was significantly inhibited by a molar excess of unlabeled competitor. In order to further determine if KLF15 binds to the promoter sequence, super-shift assay was performed using anti-KLF15 mAb but no supplementary band was detected. This result indicates that KLF15 may not directly interact with the minimal promoter sequence.
The rat hybridoma cell line YB2/0 is considered as an alternative for the large-scale production of low fucose IgG . The fucose transfer capacity of YB2/0 is much lower than the other rodent cell lines commonly used . However, the amount of fucose-negative antibody produced by YB2/0 significantly decreased with the culture, due to the elevation of fut8 expression by the YB2/0 cells . Important variations of the fucose content are also observed in production culture conditions.
To improve our knowledge of YB2/0 fucosylation machinery, we have cloned rat fut8 cDNA. Fut8 gene coding region spans over 140 kb of rat chromosome 6 and splits into nine coding exons with an organization closely related to that of the human ortholog . The rat fut8 cDNA contains an ORF of 1725 bp, encoding a 575 amino acids polypeptide, showing 94% and 88% identity with the human and porcine enzymes, respectively. The amino acids sequence contains the three specific motifs of α1,6-fucosyltranferase in the catalytic domain (Figure 2). These motifs are shared by α2-fucosyltransferases, α6-fucosyltransferases, and protein-O-fucosyltransferases (POFUT), indicating that the corresponding genes have originated from a common ancestor by duplication and divergent evolution .
Interestingly, we identified 4 nucleotide changes in the coding sequence of rat fut8 cDNA when compared to the putative sequence (NM_001002289.1). Two of these SNP were also found in different EST sequences of the NCBI databases, showing the existence of a silent allelic polymorphism in rat gene, but without change in the amino-acid sequence of the polypeptide.
By FISH, we were able to determine the copy number of fut8 gene in YB2/0, showing a heterogeneous cell population, 60% of cells having three fut8 copies and 25.5% with 4 or more copies, the mean copy number being 2.8 ± 1.4 (Figure 3). Hybridoma cell lines such as YB2/0 are usually tetraploid but are also genetically instable. Depending on the culture medium, continuous cultivation induces chromosome rearrangements and loss of genetic material  that can explain fut8 heterogeneity. Even if other parameters dependent on the culture conditions may also influence fut8 expression during the cultivation, the heterogeneity of fut8 copy number should also have important consequences in fucosylation capacity of these cells.
RLM-RACE experiments with capped RNAs allowed to define for the first time the organization of the 5'-untranslated region of rat fut8 gene and to identify the different TSS. The rat fut8 gene 5'-untranslated region contains 4 exons spanning about 90 kb. Three mRNA isoforms were identified, arising from alternative splicing and alternative promoter usage, as shown in Figure 5. The quantification of T1 and T2 transcripts relative expression was performed by duplex Taqman™ QPCR, showing that T2 transcript was 1.6-fold higher expressed than the T1. This pattern of expression was similar in both YB2/0 and Rat2 cell lines. Several TSS were identified for each transcript, which is a common attribute for TATA-less promoter . Data concerning fut8 5'-untranslated region and transcripts expression are rather limited. It has been shown that in the human SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cells, FUT8 expression is controlled by the 5'-flanking region upstream exon 1. However, other 5'-untranslated sequences were found in ESTs, suggesting the presence of additional exons upstream exon 1, and that the transcription of the gene would be regulated by multiple promoters . Two additional 5'-untranslated exons were identified upstream human FUT8 exon 1, which are expressed during embryogenesis as three groups of transcripts, suggesting an expression of FUT8 regulated by three different promoters . From these data, it appears that rat and human FUT8 genes have a quite similar organization and pattern of expression, with at least three different transcripts encoding the same polypeptide.
The alternative first exons E-2 and E-3 are located about 90 kbp from the first coding exon E1 and separated by a 1 kbp intronic sequence. The 1 kbp rat genomic sequences upstream exons E-2 and E-3 were cloned in the pGL3b upstream the luciferase gene to determine the minimal promoter regions controlling the transcription of T1 and T2. These plasmids and 5'- or 3'-deleted constructions were transfected into YB2/0 and Rat2 cells for luciferase assays. However, the ratio of luminescence intensity for these different constructions compared to the control pGL3b was too low to allow determining the promoter activity in YB2/0. Nevertheless, we were able to delimitate the minimal promoter regions controlling the expression of both transcripts in Rat2 cells. We could show that the T1 transcript is controlled by a minimal promoter region within the sequence -892/-451 from ATG with two negative regulation regions within the -451/-411 and -1438/-1205 sequences. The binding of Rat2 cells nuclear proteins to the P1 minimal promoter region was confirmed by EMSA analysis. We also showed the existence of a minimal promoter region within the sequence -720/-537 upstream the ATG for transcript T2 and a strong positive regulation region in the exon E-3. Few are known about the promoters of fut8 in other species. Only one study has shown that in human ovarian cancer cells SK-OV-3, luciferase reporter assay indicated that the 1 kbp 5'-flanking region of exon E1 conferred the promoter activity. This region contains a TATA-box, but not a CCAAT motif, and potential binding sites for some transcription factors, such as bHLH, cMyb and GATA-1 .
Bioinformatics analysis of the promoter regions did not reveal any canonical TATA or CAAT boxes, but several putative binding sites for general transcription factors. Absence of TATA or CAAT boxes is a common feature of glycosyltransferase genes . It is also in agreement with the presence of several TSS for the three transcripts, which is usual for such promoter regions. We also identified in both minimal promoter sequences several binding sites for transcription factors with repressor activity, which could be interesting targets to regulate fut8 in YB2/0. MZF1 (Myeloid Zinc Finger 1), PAX5 (Paired Box 5), KLF15 (Krüppel-like Factor 15), IRF3 (Interferon Regulatory Factor 3) and PRDM1 (Positive Regulatory Domain containing 1) consensus sequences have been identified in P1 promoter. MZF1 is known to regulate transcription of genes involved in cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis of myeloid cells. It is described as a repressor in non-hematopoietic cells and activator in hematopoietic cells . PAX5 is known to down-regulate genes implicated in myeloid or T-lymphocyte differentiation in pro- B lymphocytes . Interestingly, it has been shown that fut8 is up-regulated in PAX5-/- cells . KLF15 has been demonstrated as a repressor of several important genes such the adrenomodullin gene in adipocytes  or the rhodopsin and the IRBP (Interphotoreceptor Retinoid Binding Protein) genes . IRF3 is described as a repressor of RXRα, which is a key partner for number of nuclear receptors . PRDM1 (alias Blimp1 or Prd1-Bf1) is known to repress several critical genes in B lymphocytes such as c-Myc . HELT (Hey like transcriptional repressor), CDP (CCAAT displacement protein), MEL1 (MDS1/EVI1-like gene 1), Nkx3.1 (androgen-regulated homeobox protein), IKRS (Ikaros) and the zinc-finger transcription factor Gfi-1 were also identified in minimal promoter P2. HELT was shown to act as a transcriptional repressor in the neuronal development . CDP is known to interact with regulatory element from a large number of genes involved in differentiation, cell growth and development. It is acting as a repressor by either a direct repressing effect when stably bound to the promoter, or by competing with activator factors for the occupancy of their binding sites . MEL1 is described to have an essential function in the proliferation and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells . MEL1 is also known as a transcription repressor factor in the regulation of calreticulin expression, acting as a competitor with GATA6 factor . Nkx3.1 is a homeodomain transcription factor, described as a transcriptional inhibitor of estrogen receptor activity, acting as a putative repressor in hormone-driven tumors . IKRS factors are zinc finger DNA binding proteins. Six isoforms of IKAROS are described that often act as repressors. They seem to have a regulation role in the lymphocyte ontogeny . Gfi-1 is described as a transcriptional repressor in lymphoid cell but its function can change with the cell context in hematopoietic development .
These transcriptional repressors can potentially bind to the fut8 minimal promoter regions and, in a first approach to control fut8 expression, the identified putative repressors of T1 transcript were co-transfected in Rat2 cells with reporter vector pGL3(-892/-451) containing the minimal promoter P1 sequence. No repressor activity was observed with MZF1, PAX5, IRF3 or PRDM1. In particular, we were not able to confirm the repressor activity of PAX5, as previously demonstrated in Pax5-/- cells . However, KLF15 expression induced a 50% decrease of luciferase activity, whatever the concentration of vector. Western blot analysis of transfected cell lysates using anti-KLF15 mAb revealed two bands around 55 kDa. Whereas the theoretical molecular weight of KLF15 is about 45 kDa, this is in agreement with the apparent molecular weight of KLF15 protein previously observed in SDS-PAGE . The 8 kDa difference between the two bands could be also explained by a post-translational modification such as SUMOylation, as it has been demonstrated for KLF5, another transcription factor of Krüppel Like Family . Western blot showed that KLF15 is constitutively expressed in Rat2 cells, mainly in the cytosolic fraction, and increased in both nucleus and cytoplasm fractions with the concentration of transfected KLF15 expression vector in a dose-dependent manner. At the lowest concentration of vector, KLF15 is mainly over-expressed in the nucleus fraction. This is enough to observe a maximal repressor effect. This result indicates that a low expression of KLF15 in the nucleus results in a repression of the P1 minimal promoter activity.
The rat hybridoma cell line YB2/0 is potentially an alternative for the large-scale production of low fucose IgG because of lower fucose transfer capacity compared to the other rodent cell lines commonly used. However, nothing was known about the rat α1,6-fucosyltransferase. Our results shed light on the fut8 gene organization and expression. Even if many other parameters such as GDP-Fuc concentration and transport or cell culture conditions can influence the fucosylation capacity of the cells, the heterogeneity of fut8 copy number in YB2/0 could explain at least in part the variation of fucose content in IgG producing cell populations and impedes efficient gene knockdown strategy. Alternatively, the presence of potential repressor binding sequences in the minimal promoter regions of fut8 could offer possible alternatives to control the fucosylation of IgG produced in these cells.
6-FucT: the GDP-L-Fuc: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide α1,6-fucosyltransferase
Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity
CCAAT displacement protein
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
electrophoretic mobility shift assays
expressed sequence tags
Fc fragment γ-receptor
fetal calf serum
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose 3,5-epimerase, 4-reductase
Hey like transcriptional repressor
Interferon Regulatory Factor 3
Krüppel-like Factor 15
MDS1/EVI1-like gene 1
Myeloid Zinc Finger 1
androgen-regulated homeobox protein
non relevant probe
Paired Box 5
Positive Regulatory Domain containing 1
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
RNA-Ligase-Mediated Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends
transcription start site.
We would like to thank Dr. Deborah Otteson (College of Optometry, University of Houston, TX, USA) and Dr. Cyril Broccardo (Centre de Physiopathologie INSERM U563, Toulouse, France) for providing KLF15 and PAX5 expression vectors, respectively.
- Nose M, Wigzell H: Biological significance of carbohydrate chains on monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983, 80: 6632-6636. 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6632.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tao MH, Morrison SL: Studies of aglycosylated chimeric mouse-human IgG. Role of carbohydrate in the structure and effector functions mediated by the human IgG constant region. J Immunol. 1989, 143: 2595-2601.Google Scholar
- Jefferis R, Lund J, Pound JD: IgG-Fc-mediated effector functions: molecular definition of interaction sites for effector ligands and the role of glycosylation. Immunol Rev. 1998, 163: 59-76. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1998.tb01188.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mizuochi T, Taniguchi T, Shimizu A, Kobata A: Structural and numerical variations of the carbohydrate moiety of immunoglobulin G. J Immunol. 1982, 129: 2016-2020.Google Scholar
- Krapp S, Mimura Y, Jefferis R, Huber R, Sondermann P: Structural analysis of human IgG-Fc glycoforms reveals a correlation between glycosylation and structural integrity. J Mol Biol. 2003, 325: 979-989. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01250-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattu TS, Pleass RJ, Willis AC, Kilian M, Wormald MR, Lellouch AC, Rudd PM, Woof JM, Dwek RA: The glycosylation and structure of human serum IgA1, Fab, and Fc regions and the role of N-glycosylation on Fc alpha receptor interactions. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 2260-2272. 10.1074/jbc.273.4.2260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jefferis R: Glycosylation as a strategy to improve antibody-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009, 8: 226-34. 10.1038/nrd2804.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shields RL, Lai J, Keck R, O'Connell LY, Hong K, Meng YG, Weikert SH, Presta LG: Lack of fucose on human IgG1 N-linked oligosaccharide improves binding to human Fcgamma RIII and antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 26733-26740. 10.1074/jbc.M202069200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shinkawa T, Nakamura K, Yamane N, Shoji-Hosaka E, Kanda Y, Sakurada M, Uchida K, Anazawa H, Satoh M, Yamasaki M, Hanai N, Shitara K: The absence of fucose but not the presence of galactose or bisecting N-acetylglucosamine of human IgG1 complex-type oligosaccharides shows the critical role of enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 3466-3473. 10.1074/jbc.M210665200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niwa R, Hatanaka S, Shoji-Hosaka E, Sakurada M, Kobayashi Y, Uehara A, Yokoi H, Nakamura K, Shitara K: Enhancement of the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of low-fucose IgG1 Is independent of Fcgam-maRIIIa functional polymorphism. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 6248-6255. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0850.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schenerman MA, Hope JN, Kletke C, Singh JK, Kimura R, Tsao EI, Folena-Wasserman G: Comparability testing of a humanized monoclonal antibody (SynagisR) to support cell line stability, process validation, and scale-up for manufacturing. Biologicals. 1999, 27: 203-215. 10.1006/biol.1999.0179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamoda S, Nomura C, Kinoshita M, Nishiura S, Ishikawa R, Kakehi K, Kawasaki N, Hayakawa T: Profiling analysis of oligosaccharides in antibody pharmaceuticals by capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A. 2004, 1050: 211-216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyoshi E, Noda K, Yamaguchi Y, Inoue S, Ikeda Y, Wang W, Ko JH, Uozumi N, Li W, Taniguchi N: The alpha1-6-fucosyltransferase gene and its biological significance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 1473: 9-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tonetti M, Sturla L, Bisso A, Benatti U, De FA: Synthesis of GDP-L-fucose by the human FX protein. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 27274-27279. 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27274.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Becker DJ, Lowe JB: Fucose: biosynthesis and biological function in mammals. Glycobiology. 2003, 13: 41R-53R. 10.1093/glycob/cwg054.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puglielli L, Hirschberg CB: Reconstitution, identification, and purification of the rat liver Golgi membrane GDP-fucose transporter. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 35596-35600. 10.1074/jbc.274.50.35596.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Vries T, Knegtel RM, Holmes EH, Macher BA: Fucosyltransferases: structure/function studies. Glycobiology. 2001, 11: 119R-128R. 10.1093/glycob/11.10.119R.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma B, Simala-Grant JL, Taylor DE: Fucosylation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Glycobiology. 2006, 16: 158R-184R. 10.1093/glycob/cwl040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamane-Ohnuki N, Kinoshita S, Inoue-Urakubo M, Kusunoki M, Iida S, Nakano R, Wakitani M, Niwa R, Sakurada M, Uchida K, Shitara K, Satoh M: Establishment of FUT8 knockout Chinese hamster ovary cells: an ideal host cell line for producing completely defucosylated antibodies with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004, 87: 614-622. 10.1002/bit.20151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanda Y, Imai-Nishiya H, Kuni-Kamochi R, Mori K, Inoue M, Kitajima-Miyama K, Okazaki A, Iida S, Shitara K, Satoh M: Establishment of a GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (GMD) knockout host cell line: a new strategy for generating completely non-fucosylated recombinant therapeutics. J Biotechnol. 2007, 130: 300-310. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.04.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Imai-Nishiya H, Mori K, Inoue M, Wakitani M, Iida S, Shitara K, Satoh M: Double knockdown of alpha1,6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8) and GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (GMD) in antibody-producing cells: a new strategy for generating fully non-fucosylated therapeutic antibodies with enhanced ADCC. BMC Biotechnol. 2007, 7: 84-10.1186/1472-6750-7-84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mori K, Kuni-Kamochi R, Yamane-Ohnuki N, Wakitani M, Yamano K, Imai H, Kanda Y, Niwa R, Iida S, Uchida K, Shitara K, Satoh M: Engineering Chinese hamster ovary cells to maximize effector function of produced antibodies using FUT8 siRNA. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004, 88: 901-908. 10.1002/bit.20326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beuger V, Künkele KP, Koll H, Gärtner A, Bähner M, Burtscher H, Klein C: Short-hairpin-RNA-mediated silencing of fucosyltransferase 8 in Chinese-hamster ovary cells for the production of antibodies with enhanced antibody immune effector function. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009, 53: 31-37. 10.1042/BA20080220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanda Y, Yamada T, Mori K, Okazaki A, Inoue M, Kitajima-Miyama K, Kuni-Kamochi R, Nakano R, Yano K, Kakita S, Shitara K, Satoh M: Comparison of biological activity among nonfucosylated therapeutic IgG1 antibodies with three different N-linked Fc oligosaccharides: the high-mannose, hybrid, and complex types. Glycobiology. 2007, 17: 104-118. 10.1093/glycob/cwl057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tojo S, Okazaki A, Wakitani M, Shinkawa T, Uchida K, Suzawa T: A chromatographic approach for elevating the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of antibody composites. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009, 32: 1604-1608. 10.1248/bpb.32.1604.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ripka J, Adamany A, Stanley P: Two Chinese hamster ovary glycosylation mutants affected in the conversion of GDP-mannose to GDP-fucose. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1986, 249: 533-545. 10.1016/0003-9861(86)90031-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanda Y, Yamane-Ohnuki N, Sakai N, Yamano K, Nakano R, Inoue M, Misaka H, Iida S, Wakitani M, Konno Y, Yano K, Shitara K, Hosoi S, Satoh M: Comparison of cell lines for stable production of fucose-negative antibodies with enhanced ADCC. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006, 94: 680-688. 10.1002/bit.20880.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sibéril S, de Romeuf C, Bihoreau N, Fernandez N, Meterreau JL, Regenman A, Nony E, Gaucher C, Glacet A, Jorieux S, Klein P, Hogarth MP, Fridman WH, Bourel D, Béliard R, Teillaud JL: Selection of a human anti-RhD monoclonal antibody for therapeutic use: impact of IgG glycosylation on activating and inhibitory Fc gamma R functions. Clin Immunol. 2006, 118: 170-179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quandt K, Frech K, Karas H, Wingender E, Werner T: MatInd and MatInspector: new fast and versatile tools for detection of consensus matches in nucleotide sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 4878-4884. 10.1093/nar/23.23.4878.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lui X, Gorovsky MA: Mapping the 5' and 3' ends of Tetrahymena thermophila mRNAs using RNA ligase mediated amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE). Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21: 4954-4960. 10.1093/nar/21.21.4954.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozak M: Regulation of translation in eukaryotic systems. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992, 8: 197-225. 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uchida S, Tanaka Y, Ito H, Saitoh-Ohara F, Inazawa J, Yokoyama KK, Sasaki S, Marumo F: Transcriptional regulation of the CLC-K1 promoter by myc-associated zinc finger protein and kidney-enriched Krüppel-like factor, a novel zinc finger repressor. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 7319-7131. 10.1128/MCB.20.19.7319-7331.2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Duncker I, Michalski JC, Bauvy C, Candelier JJ, Mennesson B, Codogno P, Oriol R, Mollicone R: Activity and tissue distribution of splice variants of alpha6-fucosyltransferase in human embryogenesis. Glycobiology. 2004, 14: 13-25. 10.1093/glycob/cwh006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Duncker I, Mollicone R, Candelier JJ, Breton C, Oriol R: A new superfamily of protein-O-fucosyltransferases, alpha2-fucosyltransferases, and alpha6-fucosyltransferases: phylogeny and identification of conserved peptide motifs. Glycobiology. 2003, 13: 1C-5C. 10.1093/glycob/cwg113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kessler N, Aymard M, Bertrand S: Stability of a murine hybridoma is dependent on the clonal line and culture media. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1993, 29: 203-207. 10.1007/BF02634184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki Y, Taira H, Tsunoda T, Mizushima-Sugano J, Sese J, Hata H, Ota T, Isogai T, Tanaka T, Morishita S, Okubo K, Sakaki Y, Nakamura Y, Suyama A, Sugano S: Diverse transcriptional initiation revealed by fine, large-scale mapping of mRNA start sites. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2: 388-393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi Y, Ikeda Y, Takahashi T, Ihara H, Tanaka T, Sasho C, Uozumi N, Yanagidani S, Inoue S, Fujii J, Taniguchi N: Genomic structure and promoter analysis of the human alpha1, 6-fucosyltransferase gene (FUT8). Glycobiology. 2000, 10: 637-643. 10.1093/glycob/10.6.637.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taniguchi A: Promoter structure and transcriptional regulation of human β-galactoside α2,3-sialyltransferase genes. Curr Drug Targets. 2008, 9: 310-316. 10.2174/138945008783954998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan QW, Reed E, Zhong XS, Thornton K, Guo Y, Yu JJ: MZF1 possesses a repressively regulatory function in ERCC1 expression. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006, 71: 761-771. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.12.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Delogu A, Schebesta A, Sun Q, Aschenbrenner K, Perlot T, Busslinger M: Gene repression by Pax5 in B cells is essential for blood cell homeostasis and is reversed in plasma cells. Immunity. 2006, 24: 269-281. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.01.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagare T, Sakaue H, Takashima M, Takahashi K, Gomi H, Matsuki Y, Watanabe E, Hiramatsu R, Ogawa W, Kasuga M: The Krüppel-like factor KLF15 inhibits transcription of the adrenomedullin gene in adipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009, 379: 98-103. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Otteson DC, Liu Y, Lai H, Wang C, Gray S, Jain MK, Zack DJ: Kruppel-like factor 15, a zinc-finger transcriptional regulator, represses the rhodopsin and interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein promoters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004, 45: 2522-2530. 10.1167/iovs.04-0072.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamura T, Yanai H, Savitsky D, Taniguchi T: The IRF Family Transcription Factors in Immunity and Oncogenesis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008, 26: 535-584. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lord CA, Savitsky D, Sitcheran R, Calame K, Wright JR, Ting JP, Williams KL: Blimp-1/PRDM1 mediates transcriptional suppression of the NLR gene NLRP12/Monarch-1. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 2948-2958. 10.4049/jimmunol.0801692.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakatani T, Mizuhara E, Minaki Y, Sakamoto Y, Ono Y: Helt, a novel Basic-Helix-Loop transcriptional repressor expressed in the developing Central Nervous System. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 16356-16367. 10.1074/jbc.M311740200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nepveu A: Role of the multifunctional CDP/Cut/Cux homeodomain transcription factor in regulating differentiation, cell growth and development. Gene. 2001, 270: 1-15. 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00485-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goyama S, Nitta E, Yoshino T, Kako S, Watanabe-Okochi N, Shimabe M, Imai Y, Takahashi K, Kurosawa M: EVI-1 interacts with histone methyltransferases SUVH and G9a for transcriptional repression and bone marrow immortalization. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 81-88. 10.1038/leu.2009.202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qiu Y, Lynch J, Guo L, Yatsula B, Perkins A, Michalak M: Regulation of calreticulin gene by GATA6 and EVI-1 transcription factors. Biochemistry. 2008, 47: 3697-3704. 10.1021/bi702524v.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holmes K, Song J, Liu X, Brown M, Carroll J: Nkx3-1 and LEF-1 function as transcriptional inhibitors of estrogen receptor activity. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 7380-7385. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Georgopoulos K, Winandy S, Avitahl N: The role of the Ikaros gene in lymphocyte development and homeostasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997, 15: 155-176. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hock H, Orkin S: Zinc finger transcription factor Gfi-1: versatile regulator of lymphocytes, neutrophils and hematopoietic stem cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006, 13: 1-6. 10.1097/01.moh.0000190111.85284.8f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Du JX, Bialkowska AB, McConnell BB, Yang VW: SUMOylation regulates nuclear localization of Krüppel-like factor 5. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 31991-32002. 10.1074/jbc.M803612200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.