High-level expression and purification of soluble recombinant FGF21 protein by SUMO fusion in Escherichia coli
- Huiyan Wang1, 2,
- Yechen Xiao†1Email author,
- Lianjun Fu3,
- Hongxin Zhao1,
- Yaofang Zhang1,
- Xiaoshan Wan1,
- Yuxia Qin1,
- Yadong Huang4,
- Hongchang Gao2 and
- Xiaokun Li1Email author
© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 13 August 2009
Accepted: 17 February 2010
Published: 17 February 2010
Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a promising drug candidate to combat metabolic diseases. However, high-level expression and purification of recombinant FGF21 (rFGF21) in Escherichia coli (E. coli) is difficult because rFGF21 forms inclusion bodies in the bacteria making it difficult to purify and obtain high concentrations of bioactive rFGF21. To overcome this problem, we fused the FGF21 with SUMO (Small ubiquitin-related modifier) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and expressed the fused gene in E. coli BL21(DE3).
By inducing with IPTG, SUMO-FGF21 was expressed at a high level. Its concentration reached 30% of total protein, and exceeded 95% of all soluble proteins. The fused protein was purified by DEAE sepharose FF and Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. Once cleaved by the SUMO protease, the purity of rFGF21 by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was shown to be higher than 96% with low endotoxin level (<1.0 EU/ml). The results of in vivo animal experiments showed that rFGF21 produced by using this method, could decrease the concentration of plasma glucose in diabetic rats by streptozotocin (STZ) injection.
This study demonstrated that SUMO, when fused with FGF21, was able to promote its soluble expression of the latter in E. coli, making it more convenient to purify rFGF21 than previously. This may be a better method to produce rFGF21 for pharmaceutical research and development.
FGF21 is a potent regulator of glucose homeostasis . It was originally identified as a hormone that stimulates glucose uptake in adipocytes . FGF21 is induced and secreted from the liver upon fasting and acts on adipose tissues to induce metabolic adaptation to fasting[3, 4]. Specifically, FGF21 stimulates lipolysis in adipocytes, a process which releases fatty acids into the bloodstream; when they reach the liver, these fatty acids are converted to ketones. FGF21 is free of the proliferative and tumorigenic effects [5–7] that are documented for other members of the FGF family [3, 8, 9]. Systemic administration of FGF21 reduced plasma glucose, fructosamine, triglycerides, insulin, and glucagon in diabetic rhesus monkeys. FGF21 administration led to significant improvements in lipoprotein profiles, by lowering low-density cholesterol and by raising high-density cholesterol, as well as causing weight loss in the animals .
In recent years, FGF21 has been described as potential new drug candidate to combat metabolic diseases [5, 6]. However, producing FGF21 by traditional techniques, such as plasmid recombination in E. coli, yields disappointing results. Kharitonenkov's experiment has shown that recombinant FGF21 (rFGF21) accumulated and formed inclusion bodies in transformed E. coli . Our previous experiments also showed that rFGF21 without fusion expression more easily formed inclusion bodies, and it was difficult to produce bioactive protein (data not shown), because the inclusion bodies need to be denatured, annealed, and purified through many chromatography columns.
SUMO (Small ubiquitin-related modifier) proteins are covalently attached to and removed from specific protein substrates in eukaryotic cells. Sumoylation as a reversible post-translational modification process has been shown to be involved in many cellular processes including nuclear-cytosolic transport, apoptosis, protein activation, protein stability, stress response, and cell cycle progression[11, 12]. In recent years, SUMO has become an effective biotechnological tool as a fusion system to enhance soluble expression of proteins and decrease proteolytic degradation, which could not be achieved by traditional expression systems[13, 14]. SUMO is then post-translationally enzymatically cleaved from the desired protein by SUMO C-terminal hydrolases-isopeptidases . Proteins such as, SARS virus protein, MMP13, EGF, metallothionein, and KGF2 have been successfully expressed and purified using this fusion strategy.
Recently, Ren  expressed FGF21 using a commercial vector containing a SUMO tag and showed that SUMO promotes the soluble expression of FGF21 in E. coli. However, no higher level of purity was attained using Ni-NTA affility purification alone. Thus, we cloned SUMO fragment and constructed an expression plasmid containing SUMO and human FGF21. The results show that this novel method of protein expression can promote significantly higher rFGF21 levels, making it easier to be dissolved in the soluble fraction for purification and producing native N-terminal recombinant protein with its bioactivity preserved.
Results and discussion
Synthesis of the fusion gene and construction of pET-SUMO-FGF21 expression vector
PCR primers for amplifying the SUMO-FGF21 fusion gene
Primer name (size)
Sequence (5'- 3)
Sumo linker(39 bp)
Expression and purification of SUMO-FGF21
According to the isoelectric point of fusion protein, DEAE Sepharose FF was chosen for the purification of SUMO-FGF21. SDS-PAGE results show that most of the host proteins are removed from SUMO-FGF21 after being purified with a DEAE Sepharose FF column. Furthermore, a Ni-NTA affinity column was chosen for further purification. Proteins without 6 × His tags were removed from the Ni-NTA resin using PBS containing 10 mM and 20 mM imidazole; SUMO-FGF21 was eluted using PBS containing 300 mM imidazole. SDS-PAGE analysis of samples taken from this step showed that the purity of SUMO-FGF21 reached 96.5% (Figure 3B).
In recent years, there have been many reports concerning SUMO as an expression fusion tag. The expression level of the fusion protein containing metallothionein, GST and SUMO was 38.4% of the total supernatant proteins from the organism . Our data show that SUMO-FGF21 concentration is over 25% of all soluble proteins. Expression efficiency may be affected by molecular weight, amino acid constitution, and the function of proteins, etc. As far as protein isolation, we performed two-step purifications, which resulted in the purity of SUMO-FGF21 reaching 96.5%. The results show that two-step purification is helpful for improving the purity of rFGF21, which was more successful than one step Ni-NTA purification , as well as inclusion body purification .
Cleavage of the SUMO domain from SUMO-FGF21 protein and further purification of rFGF21
Next, we tested endotoxin levels from three different batches of purified rFGF21, and the results were less than 1.0 EU/ml, which is considered acceptable compared to commercially available proteins. These levels were also in accordance with the standard of injection biologics listed in the Chinese Pharmacopeia of 2005. It also suggests that the purity of rFGF21 by this method can meet the requirements of pharmaceutical research in vivo.
Mass spectrometric and N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis
In order to confirm the authenticity of rFGF21, the target protein was subjected to MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy analysis and N-terminal amino acid sequencing analysis. The molecular weight of rFGF21 analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy was 19.424 kDa, which was very close to 19.411 kDa, theoretical molecular weight of FGF21. Moreover, according to the sequencing result, the first five amino acids of our rFGF21 N-terminus were H-P-I-P-D, which was in conformity with native FGF21.
In vivobioactivity of rFGF21
Many other experiments have also documented that FGF21 could promote the glucose uptake in adipocytes  and 3T3-L1 cells , as well as reduce plasma glucose and triglyceride in animal models of type 2 diabetes, such as mouse and monkey [20, 24]. However, there were some differences in rFGF21-mediated reductions in blood glucose levels attributable to different animal genotypes and treatment. In ob/ob mice, doses of 125 and 750 μg/kg/d of FGF-21 significantly lowered blood glucose compared with vehicle treatment after 3 days of administration. After 8 days of drug administration, FGF21 treatment not only reduces fasting blood glucose, but also improves insulin sensitivity in ob/ob mice . Notably, 100 μg/kg dose of rFGF-21 lowered mean fasting plasma glucose from the overtly diabetic level to near normal when administered for 6 weeks . In our studies, rFGF21 at doses of 150, 300 or 600 μg/kg/d all decreased glucose levels in diabetic mice. Administration of FGF21 resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in circulating levels of glucose.
This study demonstrates that, when fused with SUMO, soluble expression of rFGF21 increased in E. coli; this form is also conveniently isolated rFGF21 than previously described forms. As a novel molecular chaperon domain, SUMO increases the yield of recombinant protein and makes it easier to dissolve in the soluble fraction for protein purification. This strategy can be used as a source of reference for the expression and purification of other proteins.
Pyrobest® DNA Polymerase and restriction enzymes NdeI and XhoI were purchased from TaKaRa Company (Japan). PCR purification kit, gel extraction kit, and plasmid miniprep kit were obtained from the Omega Company (USA). The expression vector pET-3c-SUMO was produced by Engineering Research Center of Bioreactor and Pharmaceutical Development, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University (China). DEAE Sepharose FF column and Sepharose G50 column were purchased from GE healthcare (Sweden). Ni-NTA agarose was obtained from Invitrogen (USA). Human FGF21 protein was purchased from the PeproTech Company (Korea), and anti-hFGF21 antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Company (USA); Dr. Yadong Huang from Ji Nan University graciously supplied us with the SUMO protease.
Construction of pET- SUMO-FGF21 recombinant plasmid
The strategy for synthesizing the fusion gene is illustrated in Figure 1. The core fragment of SUMO was first obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which was performed as follows: reaction mixture containing P1, P2, P3, P4, dNTP and 10 × PCR buffer were incubated at 94°C for 4 min. Pyrobest® DNA polymerase was added to the reaction when the temperature decreased to 55°C. The annealing step was conducted at 55°C for 5 min and elongation was done at 72°C for 60 sec to get fragment A. Likewise, P5, P6, P7, and P8, were reacted to form fragment B; primers P9, P10, P11, and P12 formed fragment C, primers P11, P12, P13, and P14 formed fragment D. Using A and B as the common template, and P1 and P8 as the forward and reverse primers, the reaction was denatured at 94°C for 5 min. This was followed by 30 consecutive cycles of denaturation: 95°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and then a final single extension at 72°C for 7 min to get the fragment M. Fragments C and D were used to create fragment N. Finally, Fragments M and N were used to form the FGF21 fragment, according to the previously described procedure.
Using pET3c-SUMO (plasmid containing SUMO fragment) as template, Pa and the SUMO linker as the forward and reverse primers, the SUMO-linker was generated. Then, using the SUMO-linker and the FGF21 fragment as the common template, Pa and P14 as the forward and reverse primers, the SUMO-FGF21 full-length constructed was created using the same PCR reaction procedure described above.
The fusion gene was digested with NdeI and XhoI, and then ligated into previously digested pET-20b(+) to create the new expression vector, pET-SUMO-FGF21. Authenticity of the inserted fragment was confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and automated DNA sequencing.
Expression and soluble detection of SUMO-FGF21
The recombinant plasmid, pET-SUMO-FGF21 was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells. SUMO-FGF21 was expressed as follows: a single transformed colony was grown in 5 ml of LB medium (1% peptone, 1% yeast extract, and 0.5% sodium chloride, pH 7.0) containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm. After overnight growth, 500 μl of culture was transferred into 50 ml of fresh LB medium for exponential growth. When the OD600 value reached 0.6, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to the culture at a final concentration of 1 mmol/L. The culture was then incubated for another 4 hours at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm. SUMO-FGF21 was separated by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the amount of fusion protein yield was measured by densitometer scanning.
Cell medium induced under different conditions was harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 min. Cell pellets were suspended into 20 mmol/L PBS buffer and dissolved by sonication. The suspensions were centrifuged at 18,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The clear supernatant was collected (soluble fraction) and the remaining pellets (insoluble fraction) containing inclusion bodies were resuspended into an equal volume of lysis buffer. Both soluble and insoluble fractions were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE.
Purification of SUMO-FGF21
The cell lysate was purified by DEAE-Sepharose FF column chromatography. SUMO-FGF21 was eluated with buffer containing different concentrations of NaCl (100-300 mmol/L, pH 9.0), followed by further purification with Ni-NTA resin (Invitrogen). The Ni-NTA resin was washed with wash buffer I (20 mmol/L PBS containing 10 mM imidazole and 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) until OD280 of effluent reached base line. Contaminating proteins were eluted from the column with wash buffer II (20 mmol/L PBS containing 20 mM imidazole and 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). Finally, 6 × His-tagged SUMO-FGF21 protein was collected from the column with elution buffer (20 mmol/L PBS containing 300 mM imidazole and 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). Samples taken at the elution peak were pooled. The purity of SUMO-FGF21 was assessed using SDS-PAGE and the concentration was evaluated by the Bradford method.
Cleavage of SUMO from SUMO-FGF21 and purification of rFGF21
The eluted fusion protein was diluted to a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Ten unit of SUMO protease were added to the dilution and the mixture was incubated in high salt buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM DTT) for 1 hr at 4°C. Following incubation, the mixture was loaded onto an Ni-NTA resin column to obtain the rFGF21, which was further concentrated by ultrafiltration at 4°C. The SUMO, SUMO-FGF21 and SUMO protease stayed bound to the Ni-NTA resin and only rFGF21 was eluted from the column when washed off the resin with elution buffer. rFGF21 was then desalted with Sepharose G50 column.
The authenticity assay for rFGF21
The immunogenic activity of purified rFGF21 was assayed by Western blotting. Total cellular protein was boiled in an equal volume of sample loading buffer, a Tris-HCl buffer (pH 6.8) containing 20% glycerol, 2.5% SDS, 10% β-Mercaptoethanol and 0.005% bromophenol blue. Protein samples were electrophoresed on 12% polyacrylamide gels containing SDS. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto PVDF membranes, and after overnight exposure to 3% BSA to block nonspecific binding, the membranes were incubated with a polyclonal FGF21 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, 1:1000). The membranes were washed and incubated with a 1:5000 dilution of secondary HRP-conjugated antibody (rabbit anti-goat IgG, Amersham Biosciences Corp.). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using a DAB kit (Boshide Inc, Wuhan, China).
For high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, purified rFGF21 was desalted and then loaded onto a C18 column. The elution was carried out using a linear gradient of 30-70% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min in the presence of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The fractions containing rFGF21 were pooled and subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequencing, amino acid composition analysis and MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy analysis. The concentration of rFGF21 was evaluated by the Bradford method.
The endotoxin concentration of rFGF21 was estimated quantitatively using the Chromogenic Tachypleus Amebocyte Lysate (TAL) endpoint assay kit as described by the manufacturer (Zhanjiang A&C Biological Ltd, China). The assay was performed according to the kit protocol.
In vivoactivity assay of rFGF21
All procedures involving animals and their care described here were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jilin Agricultural University and were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines for animal experiments. Male Wistar adult rats (weighting at 180-220 g) were randomly divided into the high fat diet group (HFD, n = 40) and the common diet group (NC, n = 8) after being fed a high fat diet for two months. HFD group animals were given peritoneal injections of 35 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ, Sigma, USA), while the NC group was given an equivalent volume of citric acid buffer. One week later, blood was collected and the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was assayed. STZ treated rats with FPG = 11.1 mmol/L were chosen as type 2 diabetes models (n = 40). Subsequently, 32 diabetic rats were divided into five groups (n = 8/group): 1) the diabetic rats treated with a 0.6 mg/kg of rFGF21 group (high dose); 2) diabetic rats treated with a 0.3 mg/kg of rFGF21 group (medium dose); 3) diabetic rats treated with a 0.15 mg/kg of rFGF21 group (low dose); 4) diabetic rats treated with insulin (5 U/day) group (positive control) and 5) diabetic rats treated with 0.9% NaCl group (negative control). In addition, the 8 NC rats constituted the blank control group. Drugs were given by subcutaneous injection once daily for two weeks.
Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Mean Value Comparisons between two groups were performed using the Student t test. Significant differences were considered at P < 0.05.
We appreciate the support of Jilin Agricultural University's doctoral fund (2007013), the scientific fund of Jilin province (2008712) and the scientific fund of Wenzhou (Y20090015).
- Muise ES, Azzolina B, Kuo DW, El-Sherbeini M, Tan Y, Yuan X, Mu J, Thompson JR, Berger JP, Wong KK: Adipose fibroblast growth factor 21 is up-regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and altered metabolic states. Mol Pharmacol. 2008, 74 (2): 403-412. 10.1124/mol.108.044826.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishimura T, Nakatake Y, Konishi M, Itoh N: Identification of a novel FGF, FGF-21, preferentially expressed in the liver. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000, 1492 (1): 203-206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inagaki T, Dutchak P, Zhao G, Ding X, Gautron L, Parameswara V, Li Y, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Esser V, et al: Endocrine regulation of the fasting response by PPARalpha-mediated induction of fibroblast growth factor 21. Cell Metab. 2007, 5 (6): 415-425. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kurosu H, Choi M, Ogawa Y, Dickson AS, Goetz R, Eliseenkova AV, Mohammadi M, Rosenblatt KP, Kliewer SA, Kuro-o M: Tissue-specific expression of betaKlotho and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor isoforms determines metabolic activity of FGF19 and FGF21. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (37): 26687-26695. 10.1074/jbc.M704165200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kharitonenkov A, Shiyanova TL, Koester A, Ford AM, Micanovic R, Galbreath EJ, Sandusky GE, Hammond LJ, Moyers JS, Owens RA, et al: FGF-21 as a novel metabolic regulator. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115 (6): 1627-1635. 10.1172/JCI23606.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wente W, Efanov AM, Brenner M, Kharitonenkov A, Koster A, Sandusky GE, Sewing S, Treinies I, Zitzer H, Gromada J: Fibroblast growth factor-21 improves pancreatic beta-cell function and survival by activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and Akt signaling pathways. Diabetes. 2006, 55 (9): 2470-2478. 10.2337/db05-1435.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Yu C, Jin C, Yang C, Xie R, Cao D, Wang F, McKeehan WL: Forced expression of hepatocyte-specific fibroblast growth factor 21 delays initiation of chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Mol Carcinog. 2006, 45 (12): 934-942. 10.1002/mc.20241.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ornitz DM, Itoh N: Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol. 2001, 2 (3): REVIEWS3005-10.1186/gb-2001-2-3-reviews3005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nicholes K, Guillet S, Tomlinson E, Hillan K, Wright B, Frantz GD, Pham TA, Dillard-Telm L, Tsai SP, Stephan JP, et al: A mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma: ectopic expression of fibroblast growth factor 19 in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160 (6): 2295-2307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kharitonenkov A, Wroblewski VJ, Koester A, Chen YF, Clutinger CK, Tigno XT, Hansen BC, Shanafelt AB, Etgen GJ: The metabolic state of diabetic monkeys is regulated by fibroblast growth factor-21. Endocrinology. 2007, 148 (2): 774-781. 10.1210/en.2006-1168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson ES: Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004, 73: 355-382. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou F, Xue Y, Lu H, Chen G, Yao X: A genome-wide analysis of sumoylation-related biological processes and functions in human nucleus. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579 (16): 3369-3375. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.076.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butt TR, Edavettal SC, Hall JP, Mattern MR: SUMO fusion technology for difficult-to-express proteins. Protein Expr Purif. 2005, 43 (1): 1-9. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.03.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun Z, Xia Z, Bi F, Liu JN: Expression and purification of human urodilatin by small ubiquitin-related modifier fusion in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 78 (3): 495-502. 10.1007/s00253-007-1330-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zuo X, Mattern MR, Tan R, Li S, Hall J, Sterner DE, Shoo J, Tran H, Lim P, Sarafianos SG, et al: Expression and purification of SARS coronavirus proteins using SUMO-fusions. Protein Expr Purif. 2005, 42 (1): 100-110. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.02.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marblestone JG, Edavettal SC, Lim Y, Lim P, Zuo X, Butt TR: Comparison of SUMO fusion technology with traditional gene fusion systems: enhanced expression and solubility with SUMO. Protein Sci. 2006, 15 (1): 182-189. 10.1110/ps.051812706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su Z, Huang Y, Zhou Q, Wu Z, Wu X, Zheng Q, Ding C, Li X: High-level expression and purification of human epidermal growth factor with SUMO fusion in Escherichia coli. Protein Pept Lett. 2006, 13 (8): 785-792. 10.2174/092986606777841280.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang Y, Su Z, Li Y, Zhang Q, Cui L, Su Y, Ding C, Zhang M, Feng C, Tan Y, et al: Expression and Purification of glutathione transferase-small ubiquitin-related modifier-metallothionein fusion protein and its neuronal and hepatic protection against D-galactose-induced oxidative damage in mouse model. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009, 329 (2): 469-478. 10.1124/jpet.108.149401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu X, Nie C, Huang Z, Nie Y, Yan Q, Xiao Y, Su Z, Huang Y, Xiao J, Zeng Y, et al: Expression and purification of human keratinocyte growth factor 2 by fusion with SUMO. Mol Biotechnol. 2009, 42 (1): 68-74. 10.1007/s12033-008-9135-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ren GP, Hou YT, Jiang YY, Li JN, Zhang W, Di L, Li DS: [Efficient expression of soluble human FGF-21 and its glucose regulation activity]. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2009, 44 (5): 548-552.Google Scholar
- Xu J, Lloyd DJ, Hale C, Stanislaus S, Chen M, Sivits G, Vonderfecht S, Hecht R, Li YS, Lindberg RA, et al: Fibroblast growth factor 21 reverses hepatic steatosis, increases energy expenditure, and improves insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obese mice. Diabetes. 2009, 58 (1): 250-259. 10.2337/db08-0392.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malakhov MP, Mattern MR, Malakhova OA, Drinker M, Weeks SD, Butt TR: SUMO fusions and SUMO-specific protease for efficient expression and purification of proteins. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2004, 5 (1-2): 75-86. 10.1023/B:JSFG.0000029237.70316.52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elghazi L, Cras-Meneur C, Czernichow P, Scharfmann R: Role for FGFR2IIIb-mediated signals in controlling pancreatic endocrine progenitor cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (6): 3884-3889. 10.1073/pnas.062321799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berglund ED, Li CY, Bina HA, Lynes SE, Michael MD, Shanafelt AB, Kharitonenkov A, Wasserman DH: Fibroblast growth factor 21 controls glycemia via regulation of hepatic glucose flux and insulin sensitivity. Endocrinology. 2009, 150 (9): 4084-4093. 10.1210/en.2009-0221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.